Inquests, inquiries and indictments: the official reception of death by disaster
In this essay I consider the reception, perception and construction of deaths by disaster. Catastrophies such as those at Aberfan, Zeebrugge and Hillsborough present a challenge to legal and political systems. They prompt immediate and long-term responses. Some of these are concerned with establishing the cause, some with preventing their recurrence and others with blame allocation. There have been public and not so public inquiries into them. In some cases there have been criminal prosecutions with suggestions of scapegoating, but all these disasters have one thing in common. They have been the subject of an inquest. To be more precise, each death has been the subject of an inquest, as are the 18,000 deaths from external causes, injuries or poisoning, which occur every year. Here I focus in particular on the role of the coroner's inquest and its relationship with other forms of public investigation in shaping public perceptions of disasters.