Can Quantum Computers Solve Linear Algebra Problems to Advance Engineering Applications?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guanglei Xu ◽  
William S. Oates
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Computing ◽  
Linear Algebra ◽  
Quantum Algorithms ◽  
Finite Difference Methods ◽  
Engineering Application ◽  
Quantum Circuit ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Measurement Methodology ◽  
Classical Computing ◽  
Richard Feynman

Since its inception by Richard Feynman in 1982, quantum computing has provided an intriguing opportunity to advance computational capabilities over classical computing. Classical computers use bits to process information in terms of zeros and ones. Quantum computers use the complex world of quantum mechanics to carry out calculations using qubits (the quantum analog of a classical bit). The qubit can be in a superposition of the zero and one state simultaneously unlike a classical bit. The true power of quantum computing comes from the complexity of entanglement between many qubits. When entanglement is realized, quantum algorithms for problems such as factoring numbers and solving linear algebra problems show exponential speed-up relative to any known classical algorithm. Linear algebra problems are of particular interest in engineering application for solving problems that use finite element and finite difference methods. Here, we explore quantum linear algebra problems where we design and implement a quantum circuit that can be tested on IBM’s quantum computing hardware. A set of quantum gates are assimilated into a circuit and implemented on the IBM Q system to demonstrate its algorithm capabilities and its measurement methodology.

The Essence of Quantum Computing

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajendra K. Bera
Keyword(s):  
Hilbert Space ◽  
Quantum Computing ◽  
Quantum Physics ◽  
Quantum Algorithms ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Turing Machines ◽  
Classical Physics ◽  
Core Set ◽  
The World ◽  
Subordinate Role

It now appears that quantum computers are poised to enter the world of computing and establish its dominance, especially, in the cloud. Turing machines (classical computers) tied to the laws of classical physics will not vanish from our lives but begin to play a subordinate role to quantum computers tied to the enigmatic laws of quantum physics that deal with such non-intuitive phenomena as superposition, entanglement, collapse of the wave function, and teleportation, all occurring in Hilbert space. The aim of this 3-part paper is to introduce the readers to a core set of quantum algorithms based on the postulates of quantum mechanics, and reveal the amazing power of quantum computing.

scholarly journals Practical Security of RSA Against NTC-Architecture Quantum Computing Attacks

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Li ◽  
Qing-yu Cai
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Computing ◽  
Ion Trap ◽  
Quantum Algorithms ◽  
Coherence Time ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Quantum Time ◽  
Speed Up ◽  
Key Length ◽  
Concurrent Architecture ◽  
Qubit Gate

AbstractQuantum algorithms can greatly speed up computation in solving some classical problems, while the computational power of quantum computers should also be restricted by laws of physics. Due to quantum time-energy uncertainty relation, there is a lower limit of the evolution time for a given quantum operation, and therefore the time complexity must be considered when the number of serial quantum operations is particularly large. When the key length is about at the level of KB (encryption and decryption can be completed in a few minutes by using standard programs), it will take at least 50-100 years for NTC (Neighbor-only, Two-qubit gate, Concurrent) architecture ion-trap quantum computers to execute Shor’s algorithm. For NTC architecture superconducting quantum computers with a code distance 27 for error-correcting, when the key length increased to 16 KB, the cracking time will also increase to 100 years that far exceeds the coherence time. This shows the robustness of the updated RSA against practical quantum computing attacks.

scholarly journals Deep neural networks for quantum circuit mapping

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Acampora ◽  
Roberto Schiattarella
Keyword(s):  
Neural Networks ◽  
Deep Neural Networks ◽  
Quantum Algorithms ◽  
Quantum Algorithm ◽  
Quantum Circuit ◽  
Machine Learning Techniques ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Physical Constraints ◽  
Proper Mapping ◽  
Correct Execution

AbstractQuantum computers have become reality thanks to the effort of some majors in developing innovative technologies that enable the usage of quantum effects in computation, so as to pave the way towards the design of efficient quantum algorithms to use in different applications domains, from finance and chemistry to artificial and computational intelligence. However, there are still some technological limitations that do not allow a correct design of quantum algorithms, compromising the achievement of the so-called quantum advantage. Specifically, a major limitation in the design of a quantum algorithm is related to its proper mapping to a specific quantum processor so that the underlying physical constraints are satisfied. This hard problem, known as circuit mapping, is a critical task to face in quantum world, and it needs to be efficiently addressed to allow quantum computers to work correctly and productively. In order to bridge above gap, this paper introduces a very first circuit mapping approach based on deep neural networks, which opens a completely new scenario in which the correct execution of quantum algorithms is supported by classical machine learning techniques. As shown in experimental section, the proposed approach speeds up current state-of-the-art mapping algorithms when used on 5-qubits IBM Q processors, maintaining suitable mapping accuracy.

scholarly journals Coreset Clustering on Small Quantum Computers

Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 1690
Author(s):  
Teague Tomesh ◽  
Pranav Gokhale ◽  
Eric R. Anschuetz ◽  
Frederic T. Chong
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Algorithms ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Small Quantum ◽  
Natural Data ◽  
Near Term ◽  
Classical Computing ◽  
Quantum Speedup

Many quantum algorithms for machine learning require access to classical data in superposition. However, for many natural data sets and algorithms, the overhead required to load the data set in superposition can erase any potential quantum speedup over classical algorithms. Recent work by Harrow introduces a new paradigm in hybrid quantum-classical computing to address this issue, relying on coresets to minimize the data loading overhead of quantum algorithms. We investigated using this paradigm to perform k-means clustering on near-term quantum computers, by casting it as a QAOA optimization instance over a small coreset. We used numerical simulations to compare the performance of this approach to classical k-means clustering. We were able to find data sets with which coresets work well relative to random sampling and where QAOA could potentially outperform standard k-means on a coreset. However, finding data sets where both coresets and QAOA work well—which is necessary for a quantum advantage over k-means on the entire data set—appears to be challenging.

scholarly journals Application of Quantum Computing to Biochemical Systems: A Look to the Future

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Ping Cheng ◽  
Erik Deumens ◽  
James K. Freericks ◽  
Chenglong Li ◽  
Beverly A. Sanders
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Computing ◽  
Physical System ◽  
Quantum Computer ◽  
Quantum Algorithms ◽  
Active Regions ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
The Future ◽  
Biochemical Systems ◽  
Near Term ◽  
Different Levels

Chemistry is considered as one of the more promising applications to science of near-term quantum computing. Recent work in transitioning classical algorithms to a quantum computer has led to great strides in improving quantum algorithms and illustrating their quantum advantage. Because of the limitations of near-term quantum computers, the most effective strategies split the work over classical and quantum computers. There is a proven set of methods in computational chemistry and materials physics that has used this same idea of splitting a complex physical system into parts that are treated at different levels of theory to obtain solutions for the complete physical system for which a brute force solution with a single method is not feasible. These methods are variously known as embedding, multi-scale, and fragment techniques and methods. We review these methods and then propose the embedding approach as a method for describing complex biochemical systems, with the parts not only treated with different levels of theory, but computed with hybrid classical and quantum algorithms. Such strategies are critical if one wants to expand the focus to biochemical molecules that contain active regions that cannot be properly explained with traditional algorithms on classical computers. While we do not solve this problem here, we provide an overview of where the field is going to enable such problems to be tackled in the future.

scholarly journals Machine Learning: A Quantum Perspective

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aishwarya Jhanwar ◽  
Manisha J. Nene
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Computing ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Learning Tasks ◽  
Current Scenario ◽  
Chip Fabrication ◽  
Classical Computing

Recently, increased availability of the data has led to advances in the field of machine learning. Despite of the growth in the domain of machine learning, the proximity to the physical limits of chip fabrication in classical computing is motivating researchers to explore the properties of quantum computing. Since quantum computers leverages the properties of quantum mechanics, it carries the ability to surpass classical computers in machine learning tasks. The study in this paper contributes in enabling researchers to understand how quantum computers can bring a paradigm shift in the field of machine learning. This paper addresses the concepts of quantum computing which influences machine learning in a quantum world. It also states the speedup observed in different machine learning algorithms when executed on quantum computers. The paper towards the end advocates the use of quantum application software and throw light on the existing challenges faced by quantum computers in the current scenario.

The Essence of Quantum Computing

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajendra K. Bera
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Computing ◽  
Fourier Series ◽  
Linear Algebra ◽  
Quantum Algorithms ◽  
Quantum States ◽  
Efficient Computation

In Part I we laid the foundation on which quantum algorithms are built. In this part we harness such exotic aspects as superposition, entanglement and collapse of quantum states of that foundation to show how powerful quantum algorithms can be constructed for efficient computation. Appendixes A and B are provided to jog the memory of those who are recently out of touch with linear algebra and Fourier series.

Quantum

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lance Fortnow
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Mechanics ◽  
Quantum Computing ◽  
Quantum Cryptography ◽  
Nobel Prize ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Physical Systems ◽  
Medium Scale ◽  
Computer Scientists ◽  
Working Together ◽  
Richard Feynman

This chapter examines the power of quantum computing, as well as the related concepts of quantum cryptography and teleportation. In 1982, the Nobel prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman noticed there was no simple way of simulating quantum physical systems using digital computers. He turned this problem into an opportunity—perhaps a computational device based on quantum mechanics could solve problems more efficiently than more traditional computers. In the decades that followed, computer scientists and physicists, often working together, showed in theory that quantum computers can solve certain problems, such as factoring numbers, much faster. Whether one can actually build large or even medium-scale working quantum computers and determine exactly what these computers can or cannot do still remain significant challenges.

scholarly journals A co-design framework of neural networks and quantum circuits towards quantum advantage

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiwen Jiang ◽  
Jinjun Xiong ◽  
Yiyu Shi
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Cost Reduction ◽  
Quantum Circuit ◽  
Quantum Circuits ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Design Framework ◽  
Unitary Matrices ◽  
Classical Computing ◽  
Classical Computer ◽  
The Cost

AbstractDespite the pursuit of quantum advantages in various applications, the power of quantum computers in executing neural network has mostly remained unknown, primarily due to a missing tool that effectively designs a neural network suitable for quantum circuit. Here, we present a neural network and quantum circuit co-design framework, namely QuantumFlow, to address the issue. In QuantumFlow, we represent data as unitary matrices to exploit quantum power by encoding n = 2k inputs into k qubits and representing data as random variables to seamlessly connect layers without measurement. Coupled with a novel algorithm, the cost complexity of the unitary matrices-based neural computation can be reduced from O(n) in classical computing to O(polylog(n)) in quantum computing. Results show that on MNIST dataset, QuantumFlow can achieve an accuracy of 94.09% with a cost reduction of 10.85 × against the classical computer. All these results demonstrate the potential for QuantumFlow to achieve the quantum advantage.

scholarly journals Efficient Decomposition of Unitary Matrices in Quantum Circuit Compilers

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 759
Author(s):  
Anna M. Krol ◽  
Aritra Sarkar ◽  
Imran Ashraf ◽  
Zaid Al-Ars ◽  
Koen Bertels
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Algorithms ◽  
Optimization Method ◽  
Quantum Circuit ◽  
Quantum Gates ◽  
Underlying Structure ◽  
Quantum Computers ◽  
Unitary Matrices ◽  
Quantum Operations ◽  
Test Part ◽  
Input Gate

Unitary decomposition is a widely used method to map quantum algorithms to an arbitrary set of quantum gates. Efficient implementation of this decomposition allows for the translation of bigger unitary gates into elementary quantum operations, which is key to executing these algorithms on existing quantum computers. The decomposition can be used as an aggressive optimization method for the whole circuit, as well as to test part of an algorithm on a quantum accelerator. For the selection and implementation of the decomposition algorithm, perfect qubits are assumed. We base our decomposition technique on Quantum Shannon Decomposition, which generates O(344n) controlled-not gates for an n-qubit input gate. In addition, we implement optimizations to take advantage of the potential underlying structure in the input or intermediate matrices, as well as to minimize the execution time of the decomposition. Comparing our implementation to Qubiter and the UniversalQCompiler (UQC), we show that our implementation generates circuits that are much shorter than those of Qubiter and not much longer than the UQC. At the same time, it is also up to 10 times as fast as Qubiter and about 500 times as fast as the UQC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document