scholarly journals Risk of cardiac and non-cardiac adverse events in community-dwelling older patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. e021681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander van Doorn ◽  
Annerien Tavenier ◽  
Frans H Rutten ◽  
Arno W Hoes ◽  
Karel G M Moons ◽  
...  

ObjectivesPatients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of many adverse events, notably stroke. To prevent all adverse outcomes, integrated AF care is advocated though the potential domain for such multidisciplinary management is still unclear. Therefore, insight in the systemic nature of AF and identifying patients at risk of adverse events after oral anticoagulation is needed. The aim of this study is to first describe the risk of hospitalisation and mortality in community-dwelling older patients with AF using anticoagulants, and second to assess the association between traditional cardiac risk factors and these outcomes.DesignA prospective cohort.SettingGeneral practice.Participants2068 patients with AF using oral anticoagulants.Outcome measuresWe calculated incidence rates (IRs) of ischaemic stroke, bleeding, hospitalisations and mortality, and compared risk factors using Cox regression between those with and without an adverse event, both for cardiac and non-cardiac causes.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 2.7 (IQR 2.2–3.0) years, the IR per 100 person-years was 22.1 for hospitalisations and 6.7 for mortality. Non-cardiac events outnumbered cardiac events (IRs 15.7 vs 7.6 per 100 person-years for hospitalisation, p<0.001 and 5.0 vs 1.7, p<0.001 for mortality). As a comparison, the IRs for stroke and major bleeding were 1.7 and 0.8 per 100 person years, respectively. In multivariate models, high age, heart failure and vascular disease were independently associated with all-cause hospitalisation and— in addition to diabetes, previous stroke and renal disease—for all-cause mortality.ConclusionsIn anticoagulated community-dwelling patients with AF, stroke risk is effectively reduced and thus fairly low, whereas risks of hospitalisation and mortality remain high, importantly mainly for non-cardiac causes. Notably high age, heart failure and vascular disease are predictive for such outcomes and may be of value in identifying high-risk patients in the future.Trial registration numberNTR3741.

Circulation ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (suppl_10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amitava Banerjee ◽  
Sophie Taillandier ◽  
Jonas B Olesen ◽  
Deirdre A Lane ◽  
Benedicte Lallemand ◽  
...  

Background: The risk of stroke and thromboembolism (TE) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) can be classified in commonly-used stroke risk stratification scores. The role of the pattern of atrial fibrillation in risk prediction is unclear in contemporary ‘real world’ cohorts. Methods: Patients diagnosed with NVAF in a four-hospital-institution between 2000 and 2010 were identified and included. Event rates of stroke/TE were calculated according to pattern of AF, i.e. paroxysmal, persistent and permanent, defined by consensus guidelines. Independent risk factors of stroke/TE were investigated by Cox regression. Results: Among 7156 patients with NVAF, 4176 (58.4%) patients with paroxysmal, 376 (5.3%) with persistent and 2604 (36.3%) with permanent NVAF patterns were included. In non-anticoagulated patients, the overall stroke/TE event rate per 100 person-years was 1.29 (95% CI 1.13–1.47). Paroxysmal NVAF patients were more likely to be female (p<0.001). Persistent NVAF patients were less likely to have prior history of stroke (p–0.002) and vascular disease (p<0.001), and more likely to have hypertension (p<0.001) and vitamin K antagonist therapy (p<0.001). Permanent NVAF patients were more likely to have diabetes (p<0.001), heart failure therapy (p<0.001) and less likely to have dyslipidaemia (p<0.001). Compared with paroxysmal NVAF, rates of stroke/TE (p=0.001), bleeding (p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (p<0.001) were significantly higher in permanent NVAF patients but not in persistent NVAF patients. In multivariate analyses, only previous stroke (hazard ratio, HR 2.58, 95% CI 2.08–3.21), vascular disease (HR 1.34,1.12–1.61), heart failure (HR 1.20,1.00–1.44), age≥75 years (HR 2.75, 2.16–3.50) and age 65–74 years (HR 1.60,1.22–2.09) increased stroke/TE risk, but persistent (HR1.13, 0.76–1.70) and permanent (HR 1.44,0.96–2.16) patterns of NVAF did not. Conclusion: In this large ‘real world’ cohort of NVAF patients, there were significant differences in rates of stroke, TE, death and bleeding between patterns of NVAF, however only previous stroke, age, heart failure and vascular disease (not pattern of NVAF) independently increased the risk of stroke/TE, death and bleeding in multivariate analyses. Therefore, the risk of stroke is similar across all patterns of NVAF and antithrombotic therapy should be based on clinical risk factors not NVAF pattern.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5363-5363
Author(s):  
John H. Chen ◽  
Daniel J. Lenihan ◽  
Sharon E. Phillips ◽  
Madan H. Jagasia ◽  
Stacey A. Goodman ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Proteasome inhibitors (PI) bortezomib (B) and carfilzomib (C) are cornerstone therapies for multiple myeloma (MM). An increased incidence of PI-induced cardiac adverse events (CAEs) has been reported in patients receiving C. However, risk factors for cardiac toxicity in this population remain unclear. Our objective is to evaluate the incidence of CAEs associated with C compared with B and identify risk factors for developing events. Patients and Method This was a retrospective analysis of 96 consecutive patients treated for MM at Vanderbilt University from 2011 to 2014 who received B (n=44) and/or C (n=52). Patients in the C group had been previously treated with B, whereas patients in the B group did not have exposure to C. No patients studied were included in both cohorts. We evaluated the clinical features and frequency of CAEs (grade II-IV heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, left ventricular dysfunction, atrial fibrillation/flutter, thromboembolism, systemic hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, or sudden cardiac death). To identify factors that predisposed patients to CAEs, we analyzed duration of PI therapy, 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk (calculated risk of myocardial infarction or stroke), gender, use of antithrombotic (antiplatelet/anticoagulant) and antihypertensive medications, prior history of cardiac events, and disease cytogenetic profile. Patients with a prior history of cardiac events were followed by a cardio-oncologist during the course of treatment. Results Table 1 shows patient characteristics. Twenty-five patients experienced CAEs (B, 13% (n=12); C, 25% (n=13)). Cumulative incidence (CI) of CAEs was not significantly different in patients on C compared with B (log-rank test P = 0.41) (Figure 1). Heart failure was the most common type of CAE (Table 2). CAEs occurred after a median of 90 days (range, 4-456) with C and 63.5 days (range, 5-336) with B. By univariate analysis, more patients in the C group were prior smokers, underwent stem cell transplantation and had more prior lines of therapy. More patients in the B group used antithrombotic and ACE inhibitor agents. There were no other significant differences in the use of antihypertensive, antiarrhythmic, and lipid-lowering medications between cohorts. Multivariate analysis showed that male gender (HR 5.3, 95% CI 1.5-18.0, P = 0.007) was an independent risk factor for developing CAEs. Patients taking antithrombotic agents had a lower risk of CAE compared with those not on these therapies (HR 0.1, 95% CI 0.04-0.54, P = 0.004). While ASCVD risk was not predictive of CAEs, patients with a prior history of cardiac events who were followed by a cardio-oncologist experienced fewer CAEs (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.05-0.72, P = 0.014). Longer duration of PI use resulted in decreasing risk of CAE (HR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-0.9, P = 0.010). There were no interactions between these outcomes. Conclusions In this series, the incidence of CAEs associated with C did not differ significantly from that of B. We found that events occurred early in therapy. Male gender was an independent risk factor for CAEs. Use of antithrombotic therapy was associated with significantly reduced risk of CAEs. These data suggest that patients may benefit from antithrombotic therapy and follow-up by a cardio-oncologist while on PI therapy, particularly if there is a prior history of cardiac events. Table 1. Bortezomib % (n=44) Carfilzomib % (n=52) P-value ASCVD Risk 0.43 0-10% 46 50 10-20% 29 36 >20% 26 14 Male Gender 57 71 0.82 Median Age, y 61 (38-91) 60 (36-86) 0.20 Past Smoker 26 51 0.02 Type II Diabetes 11 17 0.41 Hyperlipidemia 27 27 0.97 Kidney Disease 9 12 0.70 Prior History of Cardiac Event 59 60 0.96 Median Duration on Bortezomib, d 229 203 0.67 Median Duration on Carfilzomib, d 87.5 ACE Inhibitor Use 32 13 0.03 Antithrombotic Use 48 23 0.01 ISS Stage 0.72 III 34 25 FISH Risk 0.13 Standard/Intermediate 93 85 High 7 15 Median Prior Lines of Therapy 0 (0-4) 2 (0-8) <0.001 Stem Cell Transplant 45 65 0.05 Table 2. Cardiac adverse events Bortezomib Carfilzomib P-value Total Cardiac Adverse Events* 19 17 0.08 Heart Failure 9 6 Acute Coronary Syndrome 1 2 Left Ventricular Dysfunction 0 1 Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter 2 2 Thromboembolism 2 2 Systemic Hypertension 3 3 Pulmonary Hypertension 0 1 Orthostatic Hypotension 2 0 Sudden Cardiac Death 0 0 *Some patients had multiple events Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of cardiac adverse events Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of cardiac adverse events Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Youn-Jung Son ◽  
Da-Young Kim ◽  
Mi Hwa Won

Sex differences in the prognostic impact of coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) in older patients with heart failure (HF) have not been well-studied. This study, therefore, compared sex differences in the association between AF and its 90-day adverse outcomes (hospital readmissions and emergency room (ER) visits) among older adults with HF. Of the 250 older adult patients, the prevalence rates of coexisting AF between male and female HF patients were 46.0% and 31.0%, respectively. In both male and female older patients, patients with AF have a significantly higher readmission rate (male 46.0%, and female 34.3%) than those without AF (male 6.8%, and female 12.8%). However, there are no significant differences in the association between AF and ER visits in both male and female older HF patients. The multivariate logistic analysis showed that coexisting AF significantly increased the risk of 90-day hospital readmission in both male and female older patients. In addition, older age in males and longer periods of time after an HF diagnosis in females were associated with an increased risk of hospital readmission. Consequently, prospective cohort studies are needed to identify the impact of coexisting AF on short- and long-term outcomes in older adult HF patients by sex.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (55) ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Wojdyła-Hordyńska ◽  
Grzegorz Hordyński

Atrial fibrillation is one of the most common arrhythmias, with a significant increase in incidence in recent years. AF is a major cause of stroke, heart failure, sudden cardiac death, and cardiovascular disease. Timely intervention and modification of risk factors increase chance to stop the disease. Aggressive, multilevel prevention tactics are a component of combined treatment, including – in addition to lifestyle changes, anticoagulant therapy, pharmacotherapy and invasive anti-arrhythmic treatment – prevention of cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, ischemia, valvular disease and heart failure.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bishesh Shrestha ◽  
Sugam Gouli ◽  
Asis Shrestha

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in males. Its risk increases with age. So does the risk for cardiovascular disease. Androgen receptor-targeted therapy is now recommended to be added to androgen-deprivation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. We present common cardiovascular adverse events seen with the use of anti-androgens medication: abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of 13 multinational randomized phase III clinical trials looking for cardiovascular adverse events in groups that received abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide and darolutamide for treatment of prostate cancer. We analyzed a cohort of 9867 patients in these trials. Results: In the abiraterone usage group (n= 3492), most common cardiovascular adverse event was hypertension reported in 16.03%. Atrial fibrillation was reported in 0.97% and other cardiovascular events (IHD, MI, SVT, VT, and heart failure) were seen in 9.56%. In the enzalutamide usage group (n=4094) hypertension was seen in 10.6%, IHD in 1.88%, and atrial fibrillation was seen in 0.39%. Other unspecified cardiovascular adverse events were reported in 5.98%. In the apalutamide usage group (n=1327) hypertension was seen in 22%. Other cardiovascular adverse events (atrial fibrillation, MI, cardiogenic shock) were seen in 0.96%. In the darolutamide usage group (n=954) hypertension was seen in 6.6%, coronary artery disorders (coronary artery disease, coronary artery occlusion and stenosis) in 3.24%, and heart failure in 1.88%. Conclusions: The most common cardiovascular adverse event with use of anti-androgen medication seen in this large cohort analysis was hypertension with highest incidence seen in apalutamide group. Other cardiovascular side-effects noted were atrial fibrillation, SVT, VT, ischemic heart disease, MI, heart failure, and cardiogenic shock. Abiraterone and enzalutamide are the drugs that have been used in most trials. FDA adverse reaction reporting system (FAERS) shows hypertension as the most commonly reported cardiovascular adverse event with abiraterone and enzalutamide use. More prospective studies are needed to further access cardiovascular risk with use of anti-androgen therapy.


Author(s):  
Jessica G Abell ◽  
Camille Lassale ◽  
G David Batty ◽  
Paola Zaninotto

Abstract Background Falls in later life that require admission to hospital have well-established consequences for future disability and health. The likelihood and severity of a fall will result from the presence of one or more risk factors. The aim of this study is to examine risk factors identified for their ability to prevent falls and to assess whether they are associated with hospital admission after a fall. Methods Analyses of data from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA), a prospective cohort study. In a sample of 3783 men and women older than 60 years old, a range of potential risk factors measured at Wave 4 (demographic, social environment, physical, and mental functioning) were examined as predictors of fall-related hospitalizations, identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code from linked hospital records in the United Kingdom. Subdistribution hazard models were used to account for competing risk of death. Results Several risk factors identified by previous work were confirmed. Suffering from urinary incontinence (subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.95) and osteoporosis (subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.07), which are not commonly considered at an early stage of screening, were found to be associated with hospital admission after a fall. Both low and moderate levels of physical activity were also found to somewhat increase the risk of hospital admission after a fall. Conclusions Several predictors of having a fall, severe enough to require hospital admission, have been confirmed. In particular, urinary incontinence should be considered at an earlier point in the assessment of risk.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S R Lee ◽  
E K Choi ◽  
K D Han ◽  
S Oh ◽  
G Y H Lip

Abstract Background Although unhealthy or healthy lifestyle behaviors tend to be clustered, studies on the risk of clinical outcomes depending on how the lifestyle behaviors are managed after atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis remain limited. Purpose We aimed to evaluate the association between a cluster of healthy lifestyle behaviors and the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with AF. Methods Using the Korean National Insurance Service database, patients who were newly diagnosed as nonvalvular AF between 2009 and 2016 and received national health screening examination within 2-year after AF diagnosis were included. A healthy lifestyle behavior score (HLS) was calculated by assigning 1 point each for “non-current” smoking, for non-drinking, and for performing regular exercise from the self-reported questionnaire in health screening examinations. The primary outcome was defined as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for heart failure. The secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary composite outcome and all-cause death. Results A total of 208,662 patients were included and 7.1%, 22.7%, 58.6%, and 11.6% were HLS 0, 1, 2, and 3 group, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, patients with HLS 1, 2, and 3 were associated with lower risks of MACE compared to those with HLS 0 (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.788 [0.762–0.855], 0.654 [0.604–0.708], and 0.579 [0.527–0.636], respectively) (Figure). Increased number of healthy lifestyle behaviors were associated with lower risks of ischemic stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, and all-cause death. The risk reduction of healthy lifestyle combinations was consistently observed in various subgroups, regardless of CHA2DS2-VASc score and oral anticoagulant use. Conclusion Increased number of healthy lifestyle behaviors were significantly associated with lower MACE and all-cause death risks in patients with new-onset AF. These findings support the promotion of a healthy lifestyle to reduce the risk of adverse events in AF patients. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document