Abstract 13: Sex Differences in Mortality Among Patients With Covid-19 Related Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhaan S Vahidy ◽  
Jennifer Meeks ◽  
Alan Pan ◽  
Thomas Potter ◽  
Osman Khan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Overall poor COVID-19 outcomes have been reported among males. We evaluated sex differences in mortality among patients with stroke related to COVID-19. Methods: Utilizing pooled deidentified data from 30 healthcare organizations, we identified COVID-19 patients via ICD-10 diagnosis or documented laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antibodies. Patients with ICD-10 diagnoses of ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage within 30 days before or after the COVID-19 event were flagged. Male and female patients were propensity score (PS) matched on other demographic and comorbidity variables. Risk Ratio (RR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for association between sex and 90-day mortality is reported. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log rank test (LRT) were conducted for time-to-death. As a sensitivity analysis, we only included a smaller sub-set with first instance of IS or ICH ± 30-days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Results: Among 149,410 COVID-19 patients, 1,618 (1.1%) had a stroke diagnosis ± 30-days of confirmed COVID-19. Of whom, 1,609 patients (847 males and 762 females) were included in primary analyses. Females were older (67.7 vs. 65.7 years) and were more likely to be of black race (34.1% vs. 27.6%). Females had a significantly higher proportion of chronic pulmonary disease (38.8% vs. 28.8%) and obesity (34.2% vs. 24.8%); whereas males had higher proportion of alcohol abuse (8.5% vs. 3.8%). A 1:1 PS algorithm yielded an optimally matched sample of 634 males and females each, balanced on all covariates. In the matched sample, 11.7% of females and 15.8% of males experienced 90-day mortality; RR (CI): 1.35 (1.02 - 1.78), LRT p value 0.04. Higher risk of 90-day mortality among males with COVID-19 and stroke was maintained in the sensitivity analyses, RR (CI): 1.47 (1.06 - 2.00), LRT p value = 0.03 (graphic). Conclusion: Future studies examining the socio-demographic and biological mechanisms for poor stroke outcomes among males with COVID-19 are needed.

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhaan S Vahidy ◽  
Jennifer Meeks ◽  
Thomas Potter ◽  
Osman Khan ◽  
Alan Pan ◽  
...  

Introduction: Intraventricular thrombolysis (IVT) for hematoma evacuation among eligible intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients is a promising modality to improve outcomes. Methods: We analyzed deidentified pooled data from a network of 40 healthcare organizations (Aug 2010 - Jul 2020). Using ICD-10 diagnosis / procedure, current procedural terminology codes, and medications; we identified index ICH events for extra ventricular drain (EVD) placement with or without IVT. Non adult (< 18 years) patients with thrombolysis use or conditions requiring thrombolysis (cerebral / myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, hemodialysis) within 3-days prior to the index event were excluded. IVT and non-IVT patients were propensity score (PS) matched for demographic, comorbidity and clinical variables. Match adequacy was assessed by standardized mean difference (SMD). Risk Ratios (RR), 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated for mortality at 7,30, and 90-days. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis with log rank test (LRT) was performed. Results: Among 109,754 patients with an index ICH event 76,608 met the inclusion criteria. Of whom, 7,539 (9.8%) were coded for EVD presence, and 1,688 (22.4%) received IVT. Significant differences in demographic and clinical parameters were observed between IVT and non-IVT groups (graphic). At 90-days 28.4% of non-IVT and 23.2% of IVT ICH patients had died. PS algorithm yielded a 1:1 optimally matched sample (94% SMD reduction) of 1,163 IVT and non-IVT ICH patients each, without significant differences across any co-variates. In the matched sample, the mortality risk was significantly lower for the IVT group at all three timepoints. RR (CI) for 7-day: 0.62(0.50 - 0.77), for 30-day: 0.76(0.65 - 0.88), and for 90-day 0.85(0.74 - 0.97). LRT p < 0.001 for all timepoints, KM curve for 30-day outcome shown in the graphic. Conclusion: Real world utilization of IVT for eligible ICH patients demonstrates significant reduction in early mortality.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Moreno Roca ◽  
Luciana Armijos Acurio ◽  
Ruth Jimbo Sotomayor ◽  
Carlos Céspedes Rivadeneira ◽  
Carlos Rosero Reyes ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Pancreatic cancers in most patients in Ecuador are diagnosed at an advanced stage of the disease, which is associated with lower survival. To determine the characteristics and global survival of pancreatic cancer patients in a social security hospital in Ecuador between 2007 and 2017. Methods A retrospective cohort study and a survival analysis were performed using all the available data in the electronic clinical records of patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in a Hospital of Specialties of Quito-Ecuador between 2007 and 2017. The included patients were those coded according to the ICD 10 between C25.0 and C25.9. Our univariate analysis calculated frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion. Through the Kaplan-Meier method we estimated the median time of survival and analyzed the difference in survival time among the different categories of our included variables. These differences were shown through the log rank test. Results A total of 357 patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2007 and 2017 were included in the study. More than two-thirds (69.9%) of the patients were diagnosed in late stages of the disease. The median survival time for all patients was of 4 months (P25: 2, P75: 8). Conclusions The statistically significant difference of survival time between types of treatment is the most relevant finding in this study, when comparing to all other types of treatments.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4961-4961
Author(s):  
Pandora Ashley ◽  
Mark Holguin ◽  
Juhee Song

Abstract Abstract 4961 A retrospective study was conducted to ascertain if the use of thalidomide, revlimid and or velcade was associated with improved survival compared to melphalan and prednisone or vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD). To avoid possible confounding issues of treatment with high dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue, those patients were excluded from this analysis. From 1997 to 2003, 98 patients diagnosed with myeloma and treated at Scott & White Memorial Hospital using non-transplant containing regimens were identified through the Scott & White Tumor Registry. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment received. One group was treated with melphalan and prednisone or VAD chemotherapy (59 patients) and the second group was treated with regimens that included thalidomide, revlimid, or velcade (39 patients). Median survival times were estimated for the entire cohort and each treatment group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival by treatment received were estimated and log-rank test was performed to compare the survival distributions of the two treatment groups. Five year survivals of the 2 groups were compared using the Z test. Median follow-up time for the entire cohort is 32.6 months (95% CI: 24.4-37.6) Median survivals are 38.7 months (95% CI 32.7-58.5) for the thalidomide/revlimid/velcade group and 24.4 months (95% CI: 14.4-35.7) for the melphalan and prednisone or VAD group. Five year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates are 0.3452 (95% CI: 0.2007-0.4945) for the thalidomide/revlimid/velcade group and 0.1325 (95% CI: 0.0593-0.2354) for the melphalan and prednisone or VAD group. The difference in survival between the two groups is statistically significant with p value of 0.0179. In this retrospective analysis, treatment with newer agents such as thalidomide, revlimid or velcade is associated with a significant improvement in survival compared to melphalan and prednisone or VAD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7039-7039
Author(s):  
Andrew Johns ◽  
Lai Wei ◽  
Madison Grogan ◽  
Sandipkumar Patel ◽  
Mingjia Li ◽  
...  

7039 Background: Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (IO) is widely used to treat advanced cancer in pts. with medical comorbidities (MC), but the effect of MC on outcomes is poorly understood. Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective cohort study of pts. who received IO from 2011-2018. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were graded by Common Terminology for Adverse Events criteria, v4.0. MC were abstracted by query of ICD-10 codes corresponding to diagnoses in the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) at any time prior to IO start. Modified CCI scores excluding points for cancer were calculated for each pt. Bivariate analysis with chi-squared statistics was used to describe characteristics and MC of pts. with vs. without irAEs. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method (from start of first-line IO) and compared using the log-rank test. The association of CCI score and individual MC with irAEs and OS was tested with regression models adjusted for pt. characteristics. Results: Among 671 pts. with advanced cancer (39.6% melanoma; 21.8% non-small cell lung) treated with IO, median age 65 (IQR 55-74) years, the most common MC were COPD (24%) and diabetes (20%). 33.8% of pts. had CCI score ≥2. Neither CCI score nor any specific MC were associated with any grade or ≥G3 irAEs (P > 0.05). Increasing CCI score was significantly associated with decreased OS (P = 0.002). CHF (13.9 vs. 8.1 months, P = 0.008) and previous MI (14.2 vs. 10.1 months, P = 0.009) were associated with decreased median OS but did not remain significant in the regression model. Among pts. without cardiovascular disease (CVD), pts. with ≥G3 irAEs had longer OS than pts. with no ≥G3 irAEs (P < 0.001). This OS benefit for ≥G3 irAEs was not seen in pts. with CVD (P = 0.94). See table for adjusted HR. Conclusions: Risk for irAEs does not appear to be impacted by MC. Pts. with MC have shorter OS, but no specific MC are associated with OS after adjustment for pt. characteristics. OS is significantly increased among pts. without CVD who experience ≥G3 irAEs. CVD may be an important predictor of OS in pts. with irAEs and should be evaluated in patients receiving IO. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S378-S379
Author(s):  
Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava ◽  
Goar Egoryan ◽  
Daniela Patricia Trelles-Garcia ◽  
Maria Adriana Yanez-Bello ◽  
Qishuo Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Growing evidence supports the use of remdesivir and tocilizumab for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of remdesivir and tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in a community hospital setting. Methods We used a de-identified dataset of hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 according to the National Institutes of Health definition (SpO2 &lt; 94% on room air, a PaO2/FiO2 &lt; 300 mm Hg, respiratory frequency &gt; 30/min, or lung infiltrates &gt; 50%) admitted to our community hospital located in Evanston Illinois, between March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2021. We performed a Cox proportional hazards regression model to examine the relationship between the use of remdesivir and tocilizumab and inpatient mortality. To minimize confounders, we adjusted for age, qSOFA score, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, and steroids, forcing these variables into the model. We implemented a sensitivity analysis calculating the E-value (with the lower confidence limit) for the obtained point estimates to assess the potential effect of unmeasured confounding. Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for in-hospital death among patients treated with and without steroids The hazard ratio was derived from a bivariable Cox regression model. The survival curves were compared with a log-rank test, where a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for in-hospital death among patients treated with and without remdesivir The hazard ratio was derived from a bivariable Cox regression model. The survival curves were compared with a log-rank test, where a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 549 patients were included. The median age was 69 years (interquartile range, 59 – 80 years), 333 (59.6%) were male, 231 were White (41.3%), and 235 (42%) were admitted from long-term care facilities. 394 (70.5%) received steroids, 192 (34.3%) received remdesivir, and 49 (8.8%) received tocilizumab. By the cutoff date for data analysis, 389 (69.6%) patients survived, and 170 (30.4%) had died. The bivariable Cox regression models showed decreased hazard of in-hospital death associated with the administration of steroids (Figure 1), remdesivir (Figure 2), and tocilizumab (Figure 3). This association persisted in the multivariable Cox regression controlling for other predictors (Figure 4). The E value for the multivariable Cox regression point estimates and the lower confidence intervals are shown in Table 1. Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for in-hospital death among patients treated with and without tocilizumab The hazard ratio was derived from a bivariable Cox regression model. The survival curves were compared with a log-rank test, where a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Figure 4. Forest plot on effect estimates and confidence intervals for treatments The hazard ratios were derived from a multivariable Cox regression model adjusting for age as a continuous variable, qSOFA score, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, and invasive mechanical ventilation. Table 1. Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding using E-values CI, confidence interval. Point estimate from multivariable Cox regression model. The E value is defined as the minimum strength of association on the risk ratio scale that an unmeasured confounder would need to have with both the exposure and the outcome, conditional on the measured covariates, to explain away a specific exposure-outcome association fully: i.e., a confounder not included in the multivariable Cox regression model associated with remdesivir or tocilizumab use and in-hospital death in patients with severe COVID-19 by a hazard ratio of 1.64-fold or 1.54-fold each, respectively, could explain away the lower confidence limit, but weaker confounding could not. Conclusion For patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to our community hospital, the use of steroids, remdesivir, and tocilizumab were significantly associated with a slower progression to in-hospital death while controlling for other predictors included in the models. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Maria Fe Bautista ◽  
Romina Danguilan ◽  
Mel-Hatra Arakama ◽  
Roxan Perez

Background. There is very little published data on outcomes of COVID-19 among chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We compared the outcomes of COVID-19 in a tertiary care renal hospital among CKD V patients on hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and dialysis initiation, in terms of duration of hospitalization, in-patient mortality, and 30-day mortality. Methods. A total of 436 CKD V patients, on either HD, PD, or dialysis initiation, with COVID-19 who were admitted at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI) from March 13, 2020, to August 31, 2020, were included. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed. Comparison of probability of mortality by group was performed using Log-Rank test. p values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. Among 436 CKD V patients, 298 (68%) were on HD, 103 (24%) were on PD, and 35 (8%) required dialysis initiation. Overall in-hospital mortality was 34%; 38% were on HD, 20% on PD, and 37% on dialysis initiation. Total 30-day mortality was 27%; 32% were on HD, 26% on PD, and 16% on dialysis initiation. Median follow-up was 24 days. Among the 137 deaths recorded, total median time to death was 10 days; 8.5 days, 15.5 days, and 9 days for HD, PD, and dialysis initiation groups, respectively. Probability of mortality was significantly higher in HD patients versus PD patients ( p < 0.00001 ) and in the dialysis initiation group compared to PD patients ( p = 0.0234 ). Mortality probability, however, was not significantly different in HD patients versus the dialysis initiation group ( p = 0.63 ). Conclusion. Among CKD V patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at the NKTI, those on HD and on dialysis initiation had significantly higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality, compared to patients on PD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-248
Author(s):  
Fernando C SCHACHER ◽  
Angelo A MATTOS ◽  
Carolina M MULAZZANI ◽  
Rafaela B DETANICO ◽  
Bruna FAVERO ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and severe complication of cirrhosis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of AKI staging on 30-day mortality of patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was diagnosed according to the International Club of Ascites recommendations and staged according to the European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines. Comparisons between groups were made by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test. Chi-square was calculated for dichotomous variables. Comparisons of renal impairment status among patients were performed using Kaplan-Meier statistics and differences between groups were analyzed using the log-rank test. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-two patients were included in the study. The diagnosis of AKI was performed in 98 (42.2%) of them. The overall 30-day mortality was 19.8% (46/232). Mortality increased as the degree of AKI progressed. Among patients who did not have AKI, mortality was 5.2% (7/134). When compared to patients without AKI, patients diagnosed with AKI stage 1a had mortality of 12.1% (4/33, P=0.152); patients with AKI stage 1b had mortality of 45% (18/40, P<0.001); and patients with AKI stages 2 or 3 had mortality of 68% (17/25, P<0.001). Moreover, it is noteworthy that full response to treatment was associated to a decreased mortality when compared to patients who did not show complete recovery of renal function (14.3% vs 57.9%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: AKI stages 1b or greater, but not AKI stage 1a, are associated to higher 30-day mortality of patients with cirrhosis.


Vascular ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-269
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Galzerano ◽  
Michele Giubbolini ◽  
Francesco Setacci ◽  
Gianmarco de Donato ◽  
Pasqualino Sirignano ◽  
...  

Objectives Arterovenous grafts (AVGs) present a feasible solution for creating a vascular access in patients who are unsuitable for autogenous fistula (AVF). The aim of this study is to assess the prevention rate of vein stenosis, placing a graft on an arterialized vein (GAV) instead of an anastomized AVG in a native vein (GNV). Methods This was a cohort study conducted from January 2009 to November 2012. All consecutive patients who underwent AVG in our institution were included. All patients requiring a secondary intervention were also referred to our centre. Patients underwent ultrasound follow up at first and the every month. A Kaplan–Meier method was used; a Log-rank test was used to identify whether significant difference existed between GAV and GNV ( p < 0.05). Results Forty-six grafts were placed. Twenty patients had arterialized receiving veins (group A), while 26 patients received an AVG immediately because they lacked autogenous veins suitable for fistula (group B).The average follow-up period was 16.1 months (range 0–41). The group A 41 months-patency rate was 84.3%, while group B was 43.7% ( p = 0.06). Secondary patency was similar in the two groups. Conclusions Vein arterialization seems to prevent venous stenosis improving AVG-patency rate. More data are needed; however, the borderline p value encourages new studies.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Harrison ◽  
Elnara Fazio-Eynullayeva ◽  
Deirdre A. Lane ◽  
Paula Underhill ◽  
Gregory Y.H. Lip

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Increasing evidence suggests patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may develop thrombosis and thrombosis-related complications. Some previous evidence has suggested COVID-19-associated strokes are more severe with worse outcomes for patients, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings. The aim of this study was to determine the association between COVID-19 and mortality for patients with ischaemic stroke in a large multicentre study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted using electronic medical records of inpatients from 50 healthcare organizations, predominately from the USA. Patients with ischaemic stroke within 30 days of COVID-19 were identified. COVID-19 was determined from diagnosis codes or a positive test result identified with CO­VID-19-specific laboratory codes between January 20, 2020, and October 1, 2020. Historical controls with ischaemic stroke without COVID-19 were identified in the period January 20, 2019, to October 1, 2019. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to balance the cohorts with and without CO­VID-19 on characteristics including age, sex, race and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier survival curves for all-cause 60-day mortality by COVID-19 status were produced. <b><i>Results:</i></b> During the study period, there were 954 inpatients with ischaemic stroke and COVID-19. During the same time period in 2019, there were 48,363 inpatients with ischaemic stroke without COVID-19 (historical controls). Compared to patients with ischaemic stroke without COVID-19, patients with ischaemic stroke and COVID-19 had a lower mean age, had a lower prevalence of white patients, a higher prevalence of black or African American patients and a higher prevalence of hypertension, previous cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver disease, neoplasms, and mental disorders due to known physiological conditions. After propensity score matching, there were 952 cases and 952 historical controls; cases and historical controls were better balanced on all included characteristics (all <i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). After propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed the survival probability was significantly lower in ischaemic stroke patients with COVID-19 (78.3% vs. 91.0%, log-rank test <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). The odds of 60-day mortality were significantly higher for patients with ischaemic stroke and COVID-19 compared to the propensity score-matched historical controls (odds ratio: 2.51 [95% confidence interval 1.88–3.34]). <b><i>Discussion/Conclusions:</i></b> Ischaemic stroke patients with COVID-19 had significantly higher 60-day all-cause mortality compared to propensity score-matched historical controls (ischaemic stroke patients without COVID-19).


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1457.2-1458
Author(s):  
W. G. Rojas Zuleta ◽  
O. J. Felipe Díaz ◽  
A. E. Pantoja Marquez ◽  
R. Giraldo ◽  
J. G. López Velandia ◽  
...  

Background:The optimization of biological agents (bDMARD), is a strategy that has proven to be cost effective and its use can reduce the risk related to drug exposure (1–3). It is included in the EULAR management guidelines and in the consensus of the Colombian Rheumatology Association.Objectives:To analyze optimization success of bDMARD therapies in patients with RA.Methods:Cohort study of RA patients in a specialized multicenter institution in Colombia, followed from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients in remission or low activity for at least 6 months with bDMARD, and with at least two consecutive medical visits, were included. Optimization types were dose decrease, application interval increments, or both. Patients who had disease reactivation (DAS28- CPR >3.2) and returned to standard dose, were considered a failure. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the optimization failure was estimated according to bDMARD typeResults:92 patients were included, 78.26% were women, with a median age of 57 years (IQR 50-64), a disease evolution time of 15 years (IQR 10-21), a treatment of 5.6 years (IQR 2.7-8.0), and optimization of 7.75 months (IQR 3.25-15.75). The most commonly used bDMARD therapies were etanercept 36.96%, tocilizumab 30.43% and adalimumab 16.30%. 69.39% (34) were naive for biological treatment. The 53.26% (49) of patients had a follow-up time greater than 6 months.95.92% remained under optimization scheme without disease activity changes, and 4.08% of patients underwent definitive discontinuation of bDMARD, for sustained therapeutic objective. 8.16% (4) had relapses in the first 6 months after onset, of which 2 patients returned to standard doses. In survival analysis it was observed that patients who were optimized for antiTNF failed faster than the non-antiTNF, although this difference was not statistically significant (Log Rank test 0.003 p value = 0.959). Of the total patients, 28 have been optimized for 12 months or more, of these, 96.43% (27) continue in sustained remission, and 55.56% (15) received combined therapy with s synthetic DMARD (sDMARD).Figure 1.Kaplan MeierConclusion:During follow-up, most patients remain in optimization strategy. In those who continued in sustained remission, more than half received sDMARD, this suggests that their use may be a determining factor in preventing disease relapses. More studies are required to evaluate this hypothesis.References:[1]Niccoli L, Nannini C, Blandizzi C. Personalization of biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Less frequently accounted choice-driving variables. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:2097–111.[2]ASOREUMA. Asociación Colombiana de Reumatología. Consenso sobre recomendaciones para disminución y descontinuación de la terapia biológica en pacientes con artritis reumatoide, espondilitis anquilosante y artritis psoriásica. Rev Colomb Reumatol. 2019 Jan;26(1):11–23.[3]Cantini F, Niccoli L, Nannini C. Second-line biologic therapy optimization in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;47(2):183–92.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document