Poly-Victimization Among Female College Students: Are the Risk Factors the Same as Those Who Experience One Type of Victimization?

2020 ◽  
pp. 107780122095217
Author(s):  
Jamie A. Snyder ◽  
Heidi L. Scherer ◽  
Bonnie S. Fisher

Past research has shown that a significant proportion of college students will experience a victimization during their college tenure. This body of research provides evidence that college students’ lifestyle characteristics and routine activities play a role in influencing their risk of victimization; yet, little is known about whether these same risk factors predict both single-type victimization and poly-victimization. Using a sample of more than 4,000 college women from across the United States, multivariate analyses were used to examine the risk factors for poly-victimization. Measures from both target congruence theory and lifestyles-routine activities theory were found to significantly differentiate single-type victims from poly-victims.

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 1308-1327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Elvey ◽  
Bradford W. Reyns ◽  
Susan McNeeley

This study examines target congruence and lifestyle-routine activity behaviors as explanations of stalking victimization among college students, while also considering gender as a moderator in these relationships. Analysis of a nationwide sample of more than 75,000 students from 129 universities across the United States suggests that indicators of target antagonism, target gratifiability, and target vulnerability significantly predict stalking victimization. Indicators of lifestyle-routine activities—in particular, proximity to motivated offenders, exposure to motivated offenders, and target attractiveness—are also significantly related to stalking victimization. In addition, the importance of specific risk factors vary by gender. The results highlight the importance of target congruence as an expansion of lifestyle-routine activities theory, which can help to direct policies and prevention measures in a meaningful and systematic way.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 1195-1200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa L. Lindley ◽  
Heather M. Brandt ◽  
Lucy Annang ◽  
Corrie L. Barnett ◽  
James W. Hardin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaili Calasso ◽  
Carly Thompson-Memmer ◽  
Aaron J Kruse-Diehr ◽  
Tavis Glassman

The purpose of this study was to assess the extant literature on the relationship between alcohol and sexual assault among college students. A literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), PsycINFO, JSTOR, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Key search terms included sexual assault, alcohol, and college students. A total of 23 articles met inclusion criteria, the plurality (47.8%) of which were cross-sectional and featured convenience samples (43.5%). All studies were conducted at public higher education institutions in the United States. The most salient crosscutting themes included perceived low risk for sexual assault among female college students, higher likelihood of severe sexual assault among women who consumed more alcohol, and general information about polysubstance use and sexual assault risk. Methodological shortcomings included an overreliance on convenience sampling, lack of reporting of where samples were obtained, and single-site data collection. Given the large number of studies that found women who consume alcohol are more likely than their nondrinking counterparts to experience sexual assault, public health educators must continue to prioritize female college students who drink. However, interventions should target potential perpetrators rather than focusing solely on how victims can avoid risky situations. Future research should include diverse, random samples across multiple institutions topromote greater generalizability of findings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S18-S19
Author(s):  
Kelly Zalocusky ◽  
Devika Chawla ◽  
Margaret Neighbors ◽  
Shemra Rizzo ◽  
Larry Tsai

Abstract Background While COVID-19 carries substantial morbidity and mortality, the extent of long-term complications remains unclear. Reports suggest that acute lung damage associated with severe COVID-19 can result in chronic respiratory dysfunction. This study: (1) estimated the incidence of dyspnea and ILD after COVID-19 hospitalization, and (2) assessed risk factors for developing dyspnea and ILD in a real-world cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 using US electronic health records (EHR). Methods Patients in the Optum de-identified COVID-19 EHR database who were hospitalized for COVID-19 (lab confirmed or diagnosis code) between February 20 and July 2020 and had at least 6 months of follow-up were eligible for analysis. Dyspnea and ILD were identified using diagnosis codes. The effects of baseline characteristics and hospitalization factors on the risk of incident dyspnea or ILD 3 to 6 months’ post discharge were evaluated. Results Among eligible patients (n=26,339), 1705 (6.5%) had dyspnea and 220 (0.8%) had ILD 3 to 6 months after discharge. Among patients without prior dyspnea or ILD (n=22,613), 110 (0.5%) had incident ILD (Table 1) and 1036 (4.6%) had incident dyspnea (Table 2) 3 to 6 months after discharge. In multivariate analyses, median (IQR) length of stay (LOS; 5.0 [3.0, 9.0] days in patients who did not develop ILD vs 14.5 [6.0, 26.0] days in patients who developed ILD; RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.15; P=4.34 x 10-10) and age (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03; P=4.63 x 10-3) were significantly associated with ILD. Median (IQR) LOS (5.0 [3.0, 9.0] days in patients who did not develop dyspnea vs 7 [4.0, 14.0] days in patients who developed dyspnea; RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.06; P=8.52 x 10-4), number of high-risk comorbidities (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.24; P=3.85 x 10-9), and obesity (RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.86; P=2.59 x 10-4) were significantly associated with dyspnea. Table 1. Selected Baseline Risk Factors for Incident ILD Table 2. Selected Baseline Risk Factors for Incident Dyspnea Conclusion In a real-world cohort, 4.6% and 0.5% of patients developed dyspnea and ILD, respectively, after COVID-19 hospitalization. Multivariate analyses suggested that LOS, age, obesity, and comorbidity burden may be risk factors for post-COVID-19 respiratory complications. Limitations included sensitivity of diagnosis codes, availability of labs, and care-seeking bias. Disclosures Kelly Zalocusky, PhD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee) Devika Chawla, PhD MSPH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee) Margaret Neighbors, PhD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee) Shemra Rizzo, PhD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee) Larry Tsai, MD, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (Shareholder)Genentech, Inc. (Employee)


1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia F. O'Sullivan ◽  
E. Sandra Byers ◽  
Larry Finkelman

Research comparing men's and women's experiences of sexual coercion has typically assessed differences in prevalence rates and risk. We extended this line of research by comparing the contexts of sexual coercion and reactions to sexually coercive experiences in an attempt to understand the meanings that men and women attribute to these events. Participants were 433 randomly selected college students who responded to an anonymous survey. In line with past research, more men than women reported being sexually coercive, and more women than men reported being sexually coerced in the preceding year. There was a great degree of correspondence between men's and women's reports of the contexts within which sexual coercion occurred. According to their reports, sexual coercion occurred primarily within the heterosexual dating context. Compared to men, however, women reported more negative reactions and stronger resistance to the use of sexual coercion. These findings emphasize how comparisons of prevalence rates alone may obscure important differences in the phenomenology of sexually coercive incidents for men and women. Findings are discussed in terms of implications for the development of education and prevention programs and the need to reevaluate current approaches to interpreting prevalence reports.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda Straka ◽  
Analia Albuja ◽  
Monica Desjardins ◽  
Scott Swartzwelder ◽  
Sarah Gaither

Native American/American Indian (NA/AI) and Multiracial (those who claim more than one racial group) people report notably high alcohol use compared to other racial groups in the United States. However, NA/AI and Multiracial college students also report differences in their motivations for drinking alcohol. Therefore, it remains unclear if Multiracial NA/AI individuals are at different risk for alcohol use and negative alcohol-related consequences, and if there are distinct patterns of risk factors for alcohol consumption in these understudied populations. Given that college-aged students are at particularly high risk for alcohol use, we used the AlcoholEdu for CollegeTM survey in an exploratory study to compare the association between initial drinking age, college location (urban versus rural), and alcohol use motivations and consequences between monoracial NA/AI (N = 2,359) and Multiracial NA/AI college-aged students (N = 6,263). Overall, monoracial NA/AI students reported higher incidences of alcohol use and alcohol-related problems such as blacking out and missing class, compared to Multiracial NA/AI students. Risk factors, including earlier drinking age, impacted monoracial NA/AI students more than Multiracial NA/AI students, leading to higher rates of missing class and impaired driving. Despite similar levels of Internal Coping motivations for drinking (e.g., to feel more confident or sure of yourself), monoracial NA/AI students reported drinking more than Multiracial students and experiencing higher rates negative drinking-related outcomes. These results suggest that Multiracial NA/AI students may draw on protective factors not accessible to monoracial NA/AI students, highlighting the need for tailored interventions for students at highest risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document