scholarly journals SAMe-TT2R2 predicts quality of anticoagulation in patients with acute venous thromboembolism: The MAQI2 experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akash Kataruka ◽  
Xiaowen Kong ◽  
Brian Haymart ◽  
Eva Kline-Rogers ◽  
Steve Almany ◽  
...  

A high SAMe-TT2R2 score predicted poor warfarin control and adverse events among atrial fibrillation patients. However, the SAMe-TT2R2 score has not been well validated in venous thromboembolism (VTE) patients. A cohort of 1943 warfarin-treated patients with acute VTE was analyzed to correlate the SAMe-TT2R2 score with time in therapeutic range (TTR) and clinical adverse events. A TTR <60% was more frequent among patients with a high (>2) versus low (0–1) SAMe-TT2R2 score (63.4% vs 52.3%, p<0.0001). A high SAMe-TT2R2 score (>2) correlated with increased overall adverse events (7.9 vs 4.5 overall adverse events/100 patient years, p=0.002), driven primarily by increased recurrent VTE rates (4.2 vs 1.5 recurrent VTE/100 patient years, p=0.0003). The SAMe-TT2R2 score had a modest predictive ability for international normalized ratio (INR) quality and adverse clinical events among warfarin-treated VTE patients. The utility of the SAMe-TT2R2 score to guide clinical decision-making remains to be investigated.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 205-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Schulman ◽  
Ajay K Kakkar ◽  
Sebastian M Schellong ◽  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber ◽  
Eriksson Henry ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 205 Background: Dabigatran has been compared with warfarin for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in one previous trial (RE-COVER). Based on the low rate of the primary outcome as the RE-COVER study was running, we undertook this replica study to confirm the results of RE-COVER, and to allow for more rigorous sub-group analyses. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial of 2568 patients with acute VTE, treated with low molecular weight or unfractionated heparin for 5 to 11 days, we compared dabigatran, 150 mg twice daily, with warfarin, dose-adjusted to an International Normalized Ratio of 2.0 and 3.0, each given for 6 months. Primary outcome was recurrent symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism and deaths related to venous thromboembolism during 6 months. Safety endpoints included bleeding events, acute coronary syndrome, elevated liver function tests, and adverse events. Results: Of 1279 patients randomized to dabigatran, 30 (2.4%) had recurrent VTE compared with 28 (2.2%) of 1289 patients randomized to warfarin; risk difference 0.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.0 to 1.5); p<0.0001 for the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. The hazard ratio for dabigatran was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.80). Major bleeding occurred in 15 patients treated with dabigatran and 22 patients treated with warfarin (hazard ratio 0.69; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.32) and any bleeding occurred in 200 versus 285 patients, respectively (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). The frequency of reported ACS events was less than 1% in the trial, with more cases in the dabigatran treatment group than those treated with warfarin. There were 25 deaths during each treatment, and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. Analysis of outcomes based on demographic characteristics showed consistency of effects for both safety and efficacy. This included the analysis based on Asian race, which had been limited in RE-COVER. There were 537 Asian patients in RE-COVER II compared to only 65 in RE-COVER. The event rates of recurrent VTE and of any bleeding were similar in Asians and non-Asians. Conclusion: The study confirms that the efficacy of dabigatran is non-inferior to warfarin in the treatment of acute VTE and with a lower risk for bleeding. The safety of dabigatran is similar in the Asian population compared with non-Asians. Disclosures: Off Label Use: dabigatran for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Christiansen:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment. Schnee:Boehringer Ingelheim: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4758-4758
Author(s):  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Maryam Navaie ◽  
Jessica C. Smith ◽  
Anne C. Beaubrun ◽  
Lauren E. McCullough ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4758 Introduction: Among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the success of clinical care has traditionally been evaluated in terms of survival, defined clinical events (e.g., transfusions, hospital days), and test results (e.g., major molecular or cytogenetic response). However, some of these measures may not adequately describe whether patients actually show improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Conceptually, increases in HRQoL are derived from two possible effects of pharmacotherapies: (a) comparative improvement of disease symptoms, and (b) reduction of therapy-related adverse events (AEs). With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the leading agents in CML treatment, improved morbidity and delayed mortality have been achieved with astonishing success. Moreover, through rigorously conducted research, much has been learned about the tolerability profiles to these agents with careful delineation of AEs. Recently, there has been a growing recognition by the clinical community about the need to examine the impact of TKI-related AEs on HRQoL from the patient's perspective as well as the perspectives of their health care proxies including physicians and family caregivers. As summarized in Figure 1, the triangulation of these three perspectives in cancer care has been shown to provide valuable information that informs clinical decision-making, improves adherence to prescribed treatment regimens, and optimizes care management. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the CML literature to determine the extent to which the consequences of TKI-related AEs on HRQoL has been explored from the comparative perspectives of physicians, patients and family caregivers. Methods: A systematic literature review of PubMed conducted by three independent reviewers identified 44 articles using combinations of the following broad key words: CML, HRQoL, imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, adverse events, side effects and toxicity. Articles that were economic focused (n=11), commentaries (n=9), systematic reviews without HRQoL as an endpoint measure (n=7), non-English publications (n=4), studies on pediatric patients or those without CML as a primary diagnosis (n=5), non-TKI specific (n=4) or multiple publications on the same patient population (n=1) were excluded from review. The remaining 3 articles employed different study designs including cross-sectional, longitudinal and randomized clinical trial approaches with HRQoL as a primary endpoint. Collectively, they involved 1,587 CML patients treated with TKIs. Results: The studies were limited to patients in the chronic phase of CML when HRQoL was likely to be at its highest. The average follow-up time was short, ranging between 6 to 18 months with no long-term follow-up. None of the studies provided the comparative perspective of the physician or the primary family caregiver in relation to the patient with regards to either short-term or long-term impact of AEs on HRQoL. Rather, the studies were centered solely on the patient's reported HRQoL secondary to their experience with TKI therapy but none actually linked the type, frequency or severity of AEs to the various dimensions of HRQoL. Therefore, no information was available on which AEs have the greatest effect on what dimension of HRQoL. The most commonly reported AEs that adversely impacted HRQoL included (a) non-hematologic events related to gastroenterology, dermatology, musculoskeletal system and other (e.g., edema); and (b) hematologic events such as neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Across the studies, the most consistently distressing AE experienced by >80% of patients was “lack of energy”. Desired life activities, such as being able to return to work as well as the ability to participate in social and family engagements, were also rated highly in relation to better HRQoL. Conclusions: On the whole, little to no data are available on the temporal impact of TKI-related AEs on the multiple dimensions of HRQoL. This substantial dearth of information in the CML literature is a stark contrast to other types of cancers and therapeutic agents where the myriad of factors that affect the patient's HRQoL have been investigated from the perspectives of key stakeholders in the health care paradigm, resulting in optimal clinical decision-making and improved adherence to prescribed regimens. Disclosures: Pinilla-Ibarz: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. Navaie:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. Smith:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. Beaubrun:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. McCullough:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. Hickey:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy. Toseland:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (02) ◽  
pp. 187-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tishya Indran ◽  
Anita Cummins ◽  
Ashwini Bennett ◽  
Erica Wood ◽  
Susan Brown ◽  
...  

AbstractThe highest risk of adverse events for patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is during the early anticoagulation period. However, no established model exists for early clinical monitoring of patients treated with non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The authors' aim was to evaluate the utility of a nurse-led pathway to minimize adverse events in acute VTE patients starting on rivaroxaban. The rivaroxaban VTE treatment pathway is a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with objectively confirmed VTE between July 2015 and May 2017. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients identified at major risk of adverse events (bleeding or recurrent VTE). Secondary outcomes were rates of interventions, major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB), recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Among 304 participants, 5% (n = 15) were identified to be at major and 9% (n = 28) at possible risk for adverse events. Appropriate interventions to prevent harm were required in 40 patients. Rates of major bleeding, CRNMB, recurrence, and all-cause mortality were 0.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1–1.8), 7.2% (95% CI: 4.8–10.7), 1.0 (95% CI: 0.3–2.9), and 1.6% (95% CI: 0.7–3.8), respectively. In conclusion, following discharge of acute VTE patients, a nurse-led pathway identified one in seven (14%) patients at major or possible risk of adverse events. Preemptive interventions to reduce harm translated into the low rates of bleeding and recurrence. The authors' experience highlights the feasibility and importance of a structured clinical surveillance pathway for acute VTE patients initiating NOAC therapy.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (7) ◽  
pp. 733-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh Vedantham ◽  
Akhilesh K. Sista

Abstract Patients who present with severe manifestations of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at higher risk for premature death and long-term disability. In recent years, catheter-based interventional procedures have shown strong potential to improve clinical outcomes in selected VTE patients. However, physicians continue to be routinely faced with challenging decisions that pertain to the utilization of these risky and costly treatment strategies, and there is a relative paucity of published clinical trials with sufficient rigor and directness to inform clinical practice. In this article, using 3 distinct clinical scenario presentations, we draw from the available published literature describing the natural history, pathophysiology, treatments, and outcomes of VTE to illustrate the key factors that should influence clinical decision making for patients with severe manifestations of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The results of a recently completed pivotal multicenter randomized trial are also discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (7) ◽  
pp. 1100-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graziella Bonetti ◽  
Filippo Manelli ◽  
Andrea Patroni ◽  
Alessandra Bettinardi ◽  
Gianluca Borrelli ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundComprehensive information has been published on laboratory tests which may predict worse outcome in Asian populations with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study is to describe laboratory findings in a group of Italian COVID-19 patients in the area of Valcamonica, and correlate abnormalities with disease severity.MethodsThe final study population consisted of 144 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (70 who died during hospital stay and 74 who survived and could be discharged) between March 1 and 30, 2020, in Valcamonica Hospital. Demographical, clinical and laboratory data were collected upon hospital admission and were then correlated with outcome (i.e. in-hospital death vs. discharge).ResultsCompared to patients who could be finally discharged, those who died during hospital stay displayed significantly higher values of serum glucose, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), urea, creatinine, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hscTnI), prothrombin time/international normalized ratio (PT/INR), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimer, C reactive protein (CRP), ferritin and leukocytes (especially neutrophils), whilst values of albumin, hemoglobin and lymphocytes were significantly decreased. In multiple regression analysis, LDH, CRP, neutrophils, lymphocytes, albumin, APTT and age remained significant predictors of in-hospital death. A regression model incorporating these variables explained 80% of overall variance of in-hospital death.ConclusionsThe most important laboratory abnormalities described here in a subset of European COVID-19 patients residing in Valcamonica are highly predictive of in-hospital death and may be useful for guiding risk assessment and clinical decision-making.


2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Couto Carvalho Barra ◽  
Grace Teresinha Marcon Dal Sasso ◽  
Camila Rosália Antunes Baccin

A hybrid study combining technological production and methodological research aiming to establish associations between the data and information that are part of a Computerized Nursing Process according to the ICNP® Version 1.0, indicators of patient safety and quality of care. Based on the guidelines of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the American Association of Critical Care Nurses for the expansion of warning systems, five warning systems were developed: potential for iatrogenic pneumothorax, potential for care-related infections, potential for suture dehiscence in patients after abdominal or pelvic surgery, potential for loss of vascular access, and potential for endotracheal extubation. The warning systems are a continuous computerized resource of essential situations that promote patient safety and enable the construction of a way to stimulate clinical reasoning and support clinical decision making of nurses in intensive care.


2007 ◽  
Vol 3;10 (5;3) ◽  
pp. 479-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane C. Ballantyne

The ability of opioids to effectively and safely control acute and cancer pain has been one of several arguments used to support extending opioid treatment to patients with chronic pain, against a backdrop of considerable caution that has been based upon fears of addiction. Of course, opioids may cause addiction, but the “principle of balance” may justify that “…efforts to address abuse should not interfere with legitimate medical practice and patient care.” Yet, situations are increasingly encountered in which opioid-maintained patients are refractory to analgesia during periods of pain, or even during the course of chronic treatment. The real question is whether analgesic efficacy of opioids can be maintained over time. Overall, the evidence supporting long-term analgesic efficacy is weak. The putative mechanisms for failed opioid analgesia may be related to tolerance or opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Advances in basic sciences may help in understanding these phenomena, but the question of whether long-term opioid treatment can improve patients’ function or quality of life remains a broader issue. Opioid side effects are well known, but with chronic use, most (except constipation) subside. Still, side effects can negatively affect the outcomes and continuity of therapy. This paper addresses 1) what evidence supports the long-term utility of opioids for chronic pain; 2) how side effects may alter quality of life; 3) the nature of addiction and why it is different in pain patients, and 4) on what grounds could pain medication be denied? These questions are discussed in light of patients’ rights, and warrant balancing particular responsibilities with risks. These are framed within the Hippocratic tradition of “producing good for the patient and protecting from harm,” so as to enable 1) more informed clinical decision making, and 2) progress towards right use and utility of opioid treatment for chronic pain. Key Words: Opioids, chronic pain, addiction, side effects, utility, ethics


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (18) ◽  
pp. 3502-3511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Efficace ◽  
Andrew Bottomley ◽  
David Osoba ◽  
Carolyn Gotay ◽  
Henning Flechtner ◽  
...  

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the inclusion of health-related quality of life (HRQOL), as a part of the trial design in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) setting, has supported clinical decision making for the planning of future medical treatments in prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: A minimum standard checklist for evaluating HRQOL outcomes in cancer clinical trials was devised to assess the quality of the HRQOL reporting and to classify the studies on the grounds of their robustness. It comprises 11 key HRQOL issues grouped into four broader sections: conceptual, measurement, methodology, and interpretation. Relevant studies were identified in a number of databases, including MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Both their HRQOL and traditional clinical reported outcomes were systematically analyzed to evaluate their consistency and their relevance for supporting clinical decision making. Results: Although 54% of the identified studies did not show any differences in traditional clinical end points between treatment arms and 17% showed a difference in overall survival, 74% of the studies showed some difference in terms of HRQOL outcomes. One third of the RCTs provided a comprehensive picture of the whole treatment including HRQOL outcomes to support their conclusions. Conclusion: A minimum set of criteria for assessing the reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials is necessary to make informed decisions in clinical practice. Using a checklist developed for this study, it was found that HRQOL is a valuable source of information in RCTs of treatment in metastatic prostate cancer.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e018101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karis Kin-Fong Cheng ◽  
Ethel Yee-Ting Lim ◽  
Ravindran Kanesvaran

ObjectivesThe measurement of quality of life (QoL) in elderly cancer population is increasingly being recognised as an important element of clinical decision-making and the evaluation of treatment outcome. This systematic review aimed to summarise the evidence of QoL during and after adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with cancer.MethodsA systematic search was conducted of studies published in CINAHL plus, CENTRAL, PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science from the inception of these databases to December 2016. Eligible studies included RCTs and non-RCTs in which QoL was measured in elderly patients (aged 65 years or above) with stage I–III solid tumours who were undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Because of the heterogeneity and the insufficient data among the included studies, the results were synthesised narratively.ResultsWe included 4 RCTs and 14 non-RCTs on 1785 participants. In all four RCTs, the risk of bias was low or unclear for most items but high for detection. Of the 14 non-RCTs, 5 studies were judged to have a low or moderate risk of bias for all domains, and the other 9 studies had a serious risk of bias in at least one domain. The bias was observed mainly in the confounding and in the selection of participants for the study. For most elderly patients with breast cancer, the non-significant negative change in the QoL was transient. A significant increase in the QoL during the course of temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma but a decreasing trend in QoL after radiotherapy was shown. This review also shows a uniform trend of stable or improved QoL during adjuvant therapy and at follow-up evaluations across the studies with prostate, colon or cervical cancer population.ConclusionsThis review suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy may not have detrimental effects on QoL in most elderly patients with solid tumours.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document