scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy: Analysis of Complications From a Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregorio Scerrino ◽  
Giuseppina Melfa ◽  
Cristina Raspanti ◽  
Giulia Rotolo ◽  
Giuseppe Salamone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Conventional Technique ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Cervical Hematoma ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. Nowadays, minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is considered a safe and effective option. However, its complication rate has not been specifically discussed yet. The aim of this systematic review was enrolling a large number of studies to estimate early and late complications (transient and definitive, uni- and bilateral laryngeal nerve palsy; transient and definitive hypocalcemia; cervical hematoma; hypertrophic or keloid scar) of MIVAT compared with conventional technique. Methods. The review was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria in PubMed and Embase. Search terms were “minimally invasive,” “video-assisted,” and “thyroidectomy.” We enrolled randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized trials, and noncontrolled trials. Results. Thirty-two articles were considered suitable. Complication rate of MIVAT was quite similar to conventional technique: only one randomized trial found a significant difference concerning overall skin complication, and a single trial highlighted hypocalcemia significantly increased in MIVAT, concerning serologic value only. No difference concerning symptomatic nor definitive hypocalcemia was found. Conclusions. We can confirm that MIVAT is a safe technique. It should be adopted in mean-high-volume surgery centers for thyroidectomy, if a strict compliance with indication was applied.

scholarly journals Gabapentin as an adjuvant therapy to splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Ahmed ◽  
Osama G. Hassan ◽  
Ahmed A. Khalifa
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Symptom Severity Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common upper limb entrapment neuropathy; severe cases are treated surgically and mild to moderate can be managed conservatively. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to define the efficacy of gabapentin as an adjuvant to splinting in the treatment of mild to moderate CTS. Methods A systematic search through 13 databases, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting the use of gabapentin with splinting in CTS were included and analyzed. Results Three RCTs including 170 patients were eligible. There was no significant difference between gabapentin plus splinting and splinting alone in 5 measured parameters: (1) Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) [MD (95% CI) = − 0.76 (− 2.46–0.93), p = 0.378], (2) Functional Status Scale (FSS) [MD (95% CI) = − 0.23 (− 1.40–0.94), p = 0.701], (3) visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess pain [MD (95% CI) = − 0.6 (− 1.47–0.27), p = 0.174], (4) Grip strength [MD (95% CI) = − 0.11 (− 0.70–0.48), p = 0.718], and (5) pinch strength [MD (95% CI) = 0.72 (− 0.10–1.54), p = 0.083]. Conclusion This review provides low-quality evidence that gabapentin plus nocturnal splinting is not superior to splinting alone. More high-quality trials are needed to determine the role of this drug as an adjuvant in the management of CTS.

Risk of Damaging Anatomical Structures During Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus Correction (Bösch Technique): An Anatomical Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (11) ◽  
pp. 1355-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Kaipel ◽  
Lukas Reissig ◽  
Lukas Albrecht ◽  
Stefan Quadlbauer ◽  
Joachim Klikovics ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Metatarsal Osteotomy ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Intensive Training ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Percutaneous, transverse distal metatarsal osteotomy with K-wire fixation (the Bösch technique) is an established technique for hallux valgus correction. Nevertheless, the risk of damaging the anatomical structures during the operation is unknown. Methods: Forty fresh-frozen anatomical foot specimens with hallux valgus deformity underwent a percutaneous corrective procedure. Specimens of group A (n = 20) were operated by an experienced surgeon while specimens of group B (n = 20) were done by untrained residents. Results: The dorsal cutaneous nerve was injured in 1 of 20 cases in group A and 6 of 20 cases in group B ( P = .037). There was a significant difference in overall complication rate between specimens of group A and group B ( P = .043). Conclusions: The results show an increased risk of perioperative injury of the dorsal cutaneous branch of the deep peroneal nerve as well as a significant effect of the surgeon’s experience on the overall complication rate. Clinical Relevance: Results of this study are highly relevant for all surgeons who perform percutaneous, minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery to avoid damage to the peripheral nerves. In addition, the data suggest an intensive training for surgeons before minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery is performed without supervision.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Video-assisted Thyroidectomy vs Conventional Open Hemithyroidectomy in Asian Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-192
Author(s):  
Reyaz M Singaporewalla ◽  
Anil D Rao ◽  
Arunesh Majumder
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Incision Length ◽  
Video Assisted ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Conventional Open Surgery

ABSTRACT Introduction Although the technique of minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) is well established in continental Europe, data on it's role in Asian patients is limited. We compared the results of MIVAT with conventional open hemithyroidectomy in Asian patients. Materials and methods Over a 1-year period, patients undergoing hemithyroidectomy for benign symptomatic goiters were selected. Inclusion criteria for MIVAT were benign colloid goiters, recurrent cysts or follicular lesions and neoplasms with lobe volume of less than 40 cc or nodule diameter less than 35 mm. Larger goiters underwent conventional open surgery. Patients with previous neck surgery and proven malignancy were excluded. Operative time, complications, postoperative pain score, incision length and cosmetic satisfaction at 6 months were recorded. Results Thirty-six patients (MIVAT-21, Conventional-15) were included. Both groups were comparable in terms of demographic profile and co-morbidities. The mean operating time for both groups showed no significant difference (MIVAT = 111.67 ± 19.4 min, Conventional = 112.40 ± 25.06 min; p = 0.925). Minimally invasive video assisted thyroidectomy patients had significantly less pain in the immediate postoperative period (mean pain score 2.38 vs 4.8, p < 0.001). Mean incision length at end of surgery was significantly smaller in the MIVAT group (2.58 vs 6.3 cm; p < 0.001). Neck scar satisfaction at 6 months was excellent in 71.4% of MIVAT cases vs 26.6% of conventional hemithyroidectomy cases. There were no complications in any of the treatment groups. Conclusion In selected cases, MIVAT is as safe as conventional open surgery with distinct advantages of better postoperative pain control and cosmesis. How to cite this article Rao AD, Singaporewalla RM, Majumder A. Minimally Invasive Video-assisted Thyroidectomy vs Conventional Open Hemithyroidectomy in Asian Patients. World J Endoc Surg 2016;8(3):189-192.

Complementary therapies in controlling side-effects during cancer treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 238-265
Author(s):  
Vinicius Teixeira Botelho ◽  
MELINE ROSSETTO RODRIGUES ◽  
Guilherme Augusto Rago Ferraz ◽  
Cassiana Mendes Bertoncello Fontes ◽  
Maria Helena Borgato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Anxiety Control ◽  
Significant Difference

This systematic review evaluated whether reiki had an impact on patients undergoing chemo-therapy, with possible improvement of the following outcomes: fatigue, pain, anxiety and quality of life. Method: Systematic review study with meta-analysis conducted at a tertiary care center. The following databases were searched until July 2020: MEDLINE, LILACS and CENTRAL. Two re-viewers independently examined eligible articles, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. Results: The analyzes included eight studies and showed that there was a sta-tistically significant for anxiety control (MD = -2-09; 95% CI: -3.00 to -1.19; I2 = 51%) and Quality of life (MD = -5.97; 95% CI: -10.70 to -1.25; I2 = 97%) but no statistically significant difference was found for the other outcomes analyzed. An analysis of the risk of bias has uncertain methodological limitations in the studies. Conclusions: Although there is anxiety control and improved quality of life, there is a need for the elaboration of randomized clinical trials with larger populations to verify their real performance in controlling some side effects during chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Effect of Travel Time and Distance on Outcomes in Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011420S0015
Author(s):  
Kristin C. Caolo ◽  
Scott J. Ellis ◽  
Jonathan T. Deland ◽  
Constantine A. Demetracopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Travel Time ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Drive Time

Category: Ankle; Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: Surgeons who perform a higher volume of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) are known to have decreased complication rates; evidence shows that low volume centers performing TAA have decreased survivorship when compared with high volume centers. Understanding differences in outcomes for patients traveling different distances for their TAA is important for future patients deciding where to travel for their surgery. No study has previously examined differences in outcomes of patients traveling different distances to a high volume center for their TAA. This study compares preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores for patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty who traveled less than and more than 50 miles for their TAA. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcome scores based on distance traveled or estimated drive time. Methods: This study is a single center retrospective review of 162 patients undergoing primary total ankle arthroplasty between January 2016 and December 2018. We collected the primary address as listed in the patient’s medical record and used the directions feature on Google Maps to estimate driving mileage and estimated driving time from the patient’s address to the hospital. To analyze the distance patients traveled, patients were divided into two groups: <50 miles traveled (n=91) and >50 miles traveled (n=71). To analyze the estimated drive time, patients were divided into two groups: <90 minutes (n=77), >90 minutes (n=85). We collected preoperative and most recent postoperative PROMIS scores for all patients. Differences in most recent post-operative PROMIS scores between distance groups and travel time groups were assessed using multivariable linear regression models, adjusting for the pre-operative score and follow-up time. Results: We found no significant difference in post-operative PROMIS scores between the two groups when analyzed for distance traveled or for estimated travel time after adjustment for pre-operative PROMIS score and follow-up time (Table 1). The average follow-up for all 162 patients was 1.49 years. Power analysis showed that with a sample size of 110 (55 in each group), we had 81% power to detect an effect size of 4. Patients saw an increase in their Physical Function scores and a decrease in their Pain Interference and Pain Intensity scores with postoperative scores better than population means (Table 1). Overall complication rate for the <50 miles group was 17.6%, 7.7% required surgery. The >50 miles group had an overall complication rate of 24.0%, 9.9% required surgery. Conclusion: Patients traveling further distances to a high volume orthopedic specialty hospital for their total ankle arthroplasty do not have different clinical outcomes than patients traveling shorter distances. This is particularly important for patients deciding where to have their total ankle arthroplasty surgery. Patients who travel further have the opportunity to be treated at a local academic center; however our results show that outcomes do not change when traveling further for total ankle arthroplasty. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina L. Goldstein ◽  
Kevin Macwan ◽  
Kala Sundararajan ◽  
Y. Raja Rampersaud
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported

OBJECT The objective of this study was to determine the clinical comparative effectiveness and adverse event rates of posterior minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared with open transforaminal or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF/PLIF). METHODS A systematic review of the Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed. A hand search of reference lists was conducted. Studies were reviewed by 2 independent assessors to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or comparative cohort studies including at least 10 patients undergoing MIS or open TLIF/PLIF for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders and reporting at least 1 of the following: clinical outcome measure, perioperative clinical or process measure, radiographic outcome, or adverse events. Study quality was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) protocol. When appropriate, a meta-analysis of outcomes data was conducted. RESULTS The systematic review and reference list search identified 3301 articles, with 26 meeting study inclusion criteria. All studies, including 1 RCT, were of low or very low quality. No significant difference regarding age, sex, surgical levels, or diagnosis was identified between the 2 cohorts (856 patients in the MIS cohort, 806 patients in the open cohort). The meta-analysis revealed changes in the perioperative outcomes of mean estimated blood loss, time to ambulation, and length of stay favoring an MIS approach by 260 ml (p < 0.00001), 3.5 days (p = 0.0006), and 2.9 days (p < 0.00001), respectively. Operative time was not significantly different between the surgical techniques (p = 0.78). There was no significant difference in surgical adverse events (p = 0.97), but MIS cases were significantly less likely to experience medical adverse events (risk ratio [MIS vs open] = 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.23–0.69, p = 0.001). No difference in nonunion (p = 0.97) or reoperation rates (p = 0.97) was observed. Mean Oswestry Disability Index scores were slightly better in the patients undergoing MIS (n = 346) versus open TLIF/PLIF (n = 346) at a median follow-up time of 24 months (mean difference [MIS – open] = 3.32, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The result of this quantitative systematic review of clinical comparative effectiveness research examining MIS versus open TLIF/PLIF for degenerative lumbar pathology suggests equipoise in patient-reported clinical outcomes. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of adverse event data suggests equivalent rates of surgical complications with lower rates of medical complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive TLIF/PLIF compared with open surgery. The quality of the current comparative evidence is low to very low, with significant inherent bias.

scholarly journals OralPanax notoginsengPreparation for Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinghua Shang ◽  
Hao Xu ◽  
Zhaolan Liu ◽  
Keji Chen ◽  
Jianping Liu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Angina Pectoris ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Panax Notoginseng ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference

This systematic review aims to evaluate current evidence for the benefit and side effect of oralPanax notoginsengpreparation for coronary heart disease (CHD). We included 17 randomized clinical trials (17 papers and 1747 participants). Comparing with no intervention on the basis of conventional therapy, oralPanax notoginsengdid not show significant effect on reducing cardiovascular events, but it could alleviate angina pectoris (including improving the symptoms of angina pectoris [RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.28; 7 trials,n=791], improving electrocardiogram [RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.53; 8 trials,n=727], decreasing the recurrence of angina pectoris [RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.94; 1 trials,n=60], duration of angina pectoris [RR −1.88; 95% CI −2.08 to −1.69; 2 trials,n=292], and dosage of nitroglycerin [MD −1.13; 95% CI −1.70 to −0.56; 2 trials,n=212]); oralPanax notoginsenghad no significant difference compared with isosorbide dinitrate on immediate effect for angina pectoris [RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.15; 1 trial,n=80]. In conclusion, oralPanax notoginsengpreparation could relieve angina pectoris related symptoms. However, the small sample size and potential bias of most trials influence the convincingness of this conclusion. More rigorous trials with high quality are needed to give high level of evidence, especially for the potential benefit of cardiovascular events.

Surgical Volume Affects Outcomes in Laryngectomy Procedures

2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P84-84
Author(s):  
Brenda Mast ◽  
Guy J Petruzzelli ◽  
Tricia J Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Surgical Volume ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Dependent Variables ◽  
Kolmogorov Smirnov ◽  
The University ◽  
Smirnov Test

Objective To determine whether statistical differences occur in total cost, length of stay, ICU days, and surgical complications, depending on the volume of laryngectomy procedures performed. Methods Secondary laryngectomy data from 108 hospitals participating in the University Health System Consortium was examined. All laryngectomy surgical cases occurring from July 1, 2001, through June 30, 2005, with an ICD-9 code of 30.3 or 30.4 were analyzed (N=4,551). The cases were divided into 3 categories based on the number of surgical laryngectomy cases performed by hospital. Those volume categories were high, as defined by organizations with 100–233 cases (n=1712); medium, between 60–99 cases (n=1353); and low, between 4–59 cases (n=1458). 4 dependent variables were examined including total cost, length of stay, ICU days, and complications. Results The 4 dependent variables were analyzed for normality by performing a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. All 4 variables were non-normally distributed. A Kruskal-Wallis test was then performed on each variable to determine if a statistically significant difference appeared between the 3 volume categories. Each variable was found to have statistical significant differences between the groups, with the high volume hospitals having the lowest cost, shortest length of stay, shortest ICU days, and smallest complication rate. Conclusions This study showed that hospitals with higher surgeon volume for total laryngectomies had reduced total cost, length of stay, number of ICU days, and complication rate for their patients.

scholarly journals Intraoperative 5-ALA Fluorescence-Guided Resection of High-Grade Glioma Leads to Greater Extent of Resection with Better Outcomes: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Eatz ◽  
Daniel Eichberg ◽  
Victor Lu ◽  
Long Di ◽  
Ricardo Jorge Komotar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
White Light ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Aminolevulinic Acid ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Fluorescent Imaging ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract ImportanceHigh-grade gliomas (HGG) are the most aggressive and common malignant brain tumors in adults. They have a dismally fatal prognosis. Even if gross total resection of the enhancing tumor is achieved, inevitably, invading tumor cells that are indistinguishable to the un-aided eye are left behind, which eventually leads to tumor recurrence. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is an increasingly utilized intraoperative fluorescent imaging agent for patients with HGG. It enhances visualization of HGG tissue. Despite early promising randomized clinical trial data suggesting a survival benefit for 5-ALA-guided surgery, the growing body of literature must be analyzed to confirm efficacy on patient outcomes.Objective To perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate whether there is a beneficial effect upon survival and extent of resection due to the utilization of 5-ALA in HGG surgery. Evidence ReviewLiterature regarding 5-ALA usage in HGG surgery was reviewed according to the PRISMA guidelines. One database, PubMed, was searched for assorted combinations of the keywords “5-ALA,” “high-grade glioma,” “5-aminolevulinic acid,” and “resection” in July 2020 for case reports and retrospective, prospective, and randomized clinical trials assessing and analyzing 5-ALA intraoperative use in patients with HGG. Entailed studies on PubMed and SCOPUS were found for screening using a snowball search technique upon the initially searched PubMed papers. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were excluded from our PRISMA table. Findings1,951 previously published studies were screened, 536 of which were further evaluated, and ultimately 45 were included in our systematic review. There were no date restrictions on the screened publications. Our literature search was finalized on July 16, 2020. We found an observed increase in the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the 5-ALA group compared to the white light group, as well as an observed increase in the OS and PFS of complete resections compared to incomplete resections. Of the studies that directly compared the use of 5-ALA to white light (13 of the total analyzed 45, or 28.9%), 5-ALA lead to a better PFS and OS in 88.4% and 67.5% of patients, respectively. When the studies that reported postoperative neurologic outcomes of surgeries using 5-ALA vs. white light were analyzed, 42.2% of subjects demonstrated 5-ALA use was associated with less post-op neurological deficits, whereas 34.5% demonstrated no statistically significant difference between 5-ALA and without. 23.3% of studies showed that intraoperative 5-ALA guided surgeries lead to more post-op neurological deficits. Conclusions and RelevanceUtilization of 5-ALA was found to be associated with a greater extent of resection in HGG surgeries, as well as longer OS and PFS. Postop neurologic deficit rates were mixed and inconclusive when comparing 5-ALA groups to white light groups. 5-ALA is a useful surgical adjunct for resection of HGG when patient safety is preserved.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document