Hospitalized with stroke at the weekend: Higher cost and risk of early death?

2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302199259
Author(s):  
Marco Ghiani ◽  
Sabrina Mueller ◽  
Ulf Maywald ◽  
Thomas Wilke

Objectives Previous studies have shown that weekend hospitalizations are associated with poorer health outcomes and higher mortality (“weekend effect”). However, few of these studies have adjusted for disease severity and little is known about the effect on costs. This work investigates the weekend effect and its costs for patients with cerebral infarction in Germany, adjusting for patient characteristics and proxies of stroke severity. Methods Adult patients with a cerebral infarction hospitalization 10th revision of the International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD-10: I63) between 01 January 2014 and 30 June 2017 were included from German health claims (AOK PLUS dataset). Propensity score matching was used to match patients hospitalized on weekends or on public holidays (weekend group) with patients hospitalized during the working week (workday group), based on baseline characteristics and proxies for disease severity such as concomitant diagnoses of aphasia, ataxia, and coma, or peg tube at index hospitalization. Matched cohorts were compared in terms of in-hospital, 7-day, and 30-day mortality, as well as risk and costs of stroke and rehabilitation stays in the year after first stroke. Results Of 32,311 patients hospitalized with cerebral infarction between 01 January 2014 and 30 June 2017, 8409 were in the weekend group and 23,902 in the workday group. After propensity score matching, 16,730 patients were included in our study (8365 per group). Matched cohorts did not differ in baseline characteristics or stroke severity. In the weekend group, the risk of in-hospital death (11.2%) and the seven-day mortality rate (6.8%) were 13.1% and 17.2% higher than in the workday group, respectively (both p < 0.01). The hazard ratio for death in the weekend group was 1.1 ( p = 0.043). The risks of subsequent stroke hospitalization and rehabilitation stays for a stroke were 8.4% higher and 5.5% higher in the weekend group (both p = 0.02). As a result, the stroke-related hospitalization and rehabilitation costs per patient year were, respectively, 5.6% and 8.0% higher in the weekend group (both p = 0.01). Conclusions A significant weekend effect emerged after controlling for observable patient characteristics and proxies of stroke severity. This effect also resulted in higher costs for patients admitted on weekends.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willy Sutter ◽  
Baptiste Duceau ◽  
Aurélie Carlier ◽  
Antonin Trimaille ◽  
Thibaut Pommier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To compare the clinical outcomes between patients with and without diabetes admitted to hospital with COVID-19.Methods: Retrospective multicentre cohort study from 24 academic tertiary medical centres in France including 2851 patients (675 with diabetes) hospitalised for COVID-19 between February 26 and April 20, 2020. A propensity score matching method (1:1 matching including patient characteristics, medical history, vital signs, and laboratory results) was used to compare patients with and without diabetes (n=603 in each group). The primary outcome was admission to intensive care unit (ICU) or in-hospital death. Results: Patients with diabetes were older (71 ± 13 vs. 65 ± 18 years; p<0.001), were less often female (38% vs. 44%; p<0.001) and more likely to have comorbidities: hypertension (79% vs 42%; p<0.001), coronary heart disease (23% vs 9%; p<0.001), stroke (13% vs 8%; p<0.001), heart failure (17% vs 9%; p<0.001), chronic kidney disease (26% vs 10%; p<0.001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (7% vs 5%; p<0.05). The primary outcome occurred in 584 (36.4%) patients with diabetes compared to 246 (26.8%) in those without diabetes (p<0.001). After propensity score matching, the risk of primary outcome was similar in patients with and without diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95%CI 0.95-1.41, p=0.14) and was 1.29 (95%CI 0.97 – 1.69) for in-hospital mortality, 1.26 (95%CI 0.93 – 1.72) for mortality without transfer in ICU, and 1.14 (95%CI 0.88 – 1.47) for transfer to ICU.Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort of patients hospitalised for COVID-19, diabetes was not significantly associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 severe outcomes after propensity score matching.Trial registration NCT04344327


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Seguchi ◽  
K Sakakura ◽  
K Yamamoto ◽  
Y Taniguchi ◽  
H Wada ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the very elderly is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Because the majority of study population in clinical researches focusing on the very elderly with AMI were octogenarians, clinical evidences regarding AMI in nonagenarians are sparse. The aim of the present study was to compare in-hospital clinical outcomes of AMI between octogenarians and nonagenarians. Methods We included consecutive 415 very elderly (≥80 years) patients with AMI, and divided into the nonagenarian group (n=38) and the octogenarian group (n=377). Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. Furthermore, we used propensity-score matching to find the matched octogenarian group (n=38). Results Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) to the culprit of AMI were similarly performed between the nonagenarian (86.8%) and octogenarian (87.0%) groups The incidence of in-hospital death in the nonagenarian group (13.2%) was similar to that in the octogenarian group (14.6%) (P=0.811). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the nonagenarian group (7.4±4.2 days) than that in the octogenarian group (15.4±19.4 days) (P<0.001). After using the propensity-score matching, the incidence of in-hospital death was less in the nonagenarian group (13.2%) than in the matched octogenarian group (21.1%) without reaching statistical significance (P=0.361). The length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the nonagenarian group (7.4±4.2 days) than in the matched octogenarian group (17.8±37.0 days) (P=0.01). Clinical outcomes Nonagenarian group (n=38) Octogenarian group (n=377) P value In-hospital death, n (%) 5 (13.2) 55 (14.6) 0.811 Length of hospital stay (days) 7.4±4.2 15.4±19.4 <0.001 Length of CCU stay (days) 3.3±2.5 4.7±5.1 0.109 LVEF (%) 48.2±9.2 50.8±13.7 0.152 Peak CPK (U/L) 1424.8±1580.8 1640.1±2394.4 0.912 CCU indicates Coronary care unit; LVEF, Left ventricular ejection fraction; CPK, Creatine kinase. Flow-chart Conclusions The in-hospital mortality of nonagenarians with AMI was comparable to that of octogenarians with AMI. In-hospital outcomes in nonagenarians with AMI may be acceptable as long as acute medical management including PCI to the culprit of AMI is performed. Acknowledgement/Funding None


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (15) ◽  
pp. 1275-1284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Hasegawa ◽  
Atsushi Shiraishi ◽  
Makito Yaegashi ◽  
Naoto Hosokawa ◽  
Konosuke Morimoto ◽  
...  

Aim: To compare hospital mortality in patients with aspiration-associated pneumonia treated with ceftriaxone (CTRX) and in those treated with ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT). Methods: From a Japanese multicentre observational study cohort of patients with pneumonia, those diagnosed with pneumonia and having at least one aspiration-related risk factor were selected. Propensity score-matching analysis was used to balance baseline characteristics of the participants and compare hospital mortality of patients treated with CTRX and those treated with ABPC/SBT. Results: Hospital mortality did not significantly differ between patients treated with CTRX and those treated with ABPC/SBT (6.6 vs 10.7%, risk difference -4.0, 95% CI [-9.4, 1.3]; p = 0.143). Conclusion: Further studies are needed to compare CTRX and ABPC/SBT treatments in patients with aspiration-associated pneumonia.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 774-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuhiro Kuroi ◽  
Hidenori Ohbuchi ◽  
Naoyuki Arai ◽  
Yuichi Takahashi ◽  
Shinji Hagiwara ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo develop a nicardipine prolonged-release implant (NPRI) to prevent cerebral vasospasm in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in 1999, which may be used during craniotomy, and report the results of our recent 12-year single critical care center experience.MethodsOf 432 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated between 2007 and 2019, 291 were enrolled. 97 Patients were aged >70 years (33%), 194 were female (67%), 138 were World Federation of Neurological Societies grades 1, 2, and 3 (47%), 218 were Fisher group 3 (75%), and 243 had an anterior circulation aneurysm (84%). Using a propensity score matching method for these five factors, the severity of cerebral vasospasm, occurrence of delayed cerebral infarction, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge were analyzed.ResultsOne hundred patients each with or without NPRI were selected, and the ratios of coil/clip were 0/100 and 88/12, respectively. Cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral infarction were both significantly less common in the NPRI group (p=0.004, OR=0.412 (95% CI 0.223 to 0.760) and p=0.005, OR=0.272 (95% CI 0.103 to 0.714, respectively); a significant difference was seen in the mRS score at discharge by Fisher’s exact test (p=0.0025). A mRS score of 6 (dead) was less common in the group with NPRI, and mRS scores of 0 and 1 were also less common. No side effects were seen.ConclusionsNPRIs significantly reduced the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral infraction without any side effects. The NPRI and non-NPRI groups showed different patterns of short-term outcomes in the single critical care center, which might have been due to selection bias and patient characteristics. Differences in outcomes may become clear in comparisons with patients treated by craniotomy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuteru Monden ◽  
Hiroshi Sadamori ◽  
Masayoshi Hioki ◽  
Satoshi Ohno ◽  
Norihisa Takakura

Abstract The number of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring surgical treatment has been continuously increasing. This study aimed to examine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) for HCC in elderly patients at our institution in Japan.Between 2010 and 2018, LLR and OLR were performed in 80 and 138 elderly patients (>70 years) who were diagnosed with HCC, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis with covariates of baseline characteristics was applied. Intra- and postoperative data were evaluated in both groups.After PSM, 56 patients who underwent LLR and OLR, respectively, were compared. No significant differences in demographic, clinical data, and operative times were observed. Blood loss (OLR: 327 mL; LLR: 50 mL; P< 0.001), length of postoperative hospital stay (OLR: 12 days; LLR: 7 days; P< 0.001), and time to start oral intake (OLR: 2 days; LLR: 1 day; P< 0.001) were significantly lower and shorter in the LLR group than in the OLR group. The incidence of complications over Clavien-Dindo class IIIa was similar between both groups.Our results suggest that advanced age alone is not a contraindication, and LLR can be a treatment option for elderly patients with HCC.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuteru Monden ◽  
Hiroshi Sadamori ◽  
Masayoshi Hioki ◽  
Satoshi Ohno ◽  
Norihisa Takakura

Abstract BackgroundThe number of elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) requiring surgical treatment has been continuously increasing. This study aimed to examine the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) for HCC in elderly patients at our institution in Japan.MethodsBetween 2010 and 2018, LLR and OLR were performed in 80 and 138 elderly patients (aged > 70 years) who were diagnosed with HCC, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis with covariates of baseline characteristics was applied. Intra- and postoperative data were evaluated in both groups.ResultsAfter PSM, 56 patients who underwent LLR and OLR, respectively, were compared. No significant differences in demographic, clinical data, and operative times were observed. Blood loss (OLR: 327 mL, LLR: 50 mL [P < 0.001]), length of postoperative hospital stay (OLR: 12 days, LLR: 7 days [P < 0.001]), and time to start oral intake (OLR: 2 days, LLR: 1 day [P < 0.001]) were significantly lower and shorter in the LLR group than in the OLR group. The incidence of complications over Clavien-Dindo class IIIa was similar between both groups.ConclusionsOur results suggest that advanced age alone is not a contraindication, and LLR can be a treatment option for elderly patients with HCC.Trial registration: retrospectively registered


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rintaro Moroi ◽  
Kunio Tarasawa ◽  
Yusuke Shimoyama ◽  
Masatake Kuroha ◽  
Hisashi Shiga ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and aims: Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is widely used for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCC). Both SEMS and urgent surgery have several merits and demerits. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of SEMS by comparing the mortality rate after the hospitalization between SEMS and urgent surgery for OCC.Methods: We collected OCC patients’ data using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database system. We divided eligible patients into the SEMS and urgent surgery groups using propensity score matching, and compared in-hospital death rates, length of hospitalization, and medical costs. We also conducted logistic regression analysis to identify clinical factors affecting in-hospital deaths.Results: We enrolled 17,140 cases after propensity score matching. SEMS reduced the in-hospital death rate compared to urgent surgery (2.0% vs. 3.6%, P < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization was shorter in the SEMS group than in the urgent surgery group (16 vs. 25 days, P < 0.0001). Medical costs were lower in the SEMS group than in the urgent surgery group (1,663,550 vs. 2,424,082 JPY, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis also showed that SEMS reduced in-hospital death (odds ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.50‒0.70, P < 0.0001).Conclusion: SEMS placement for OCC could reduce the mortality rate and shorten the length of hospitalization. These results facilitate considering SEMS with careful judgement for its indication when treating OCC patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 410 ◽  
pp. 116685
Author(s):  
J. Rodríguez-Pardo ◽  
A. Plaza Herráiz ◽  
L. Lobato-Pérez ◽  
M. Ramírez-Torres ◽  
I. De Lorenzo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanfei Shen ◽  
Weizhe Ru ◽  
Xinmei Huang ◽  
Shangzhong Chen ◽  
Jing Yan ◽  
...  

AbstractChronic respiratory diseases’ (CRDs) impact on re-intubation rate remains unclear. We investigated the association between these factors in mechanically ventilated patients. Data were extracted from the freely available online Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database. CRDs were defined according to ICD-9 codes. Generalised linear regression and propensity score matching were performed. Of 13,132 patients, 7.9% required re-intubation. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) had higher re-intubation (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.83–3.33) and mortality rates (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.15–2.34) than those without. Patients with asthma had a lower mortality rate (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43–0.92) but a similar re-intubation rate to those of patients without. These findings remained stable after propensity score matching and bootstrapping analysis. The association of COPD with re-intubation was significantly stronger in patients with high oxygen-partial pressure (PaO2) or mild disease severity but was independent of carbon dioxide partial pressure. Corticosteroid use was associated with increased re-intubation rates in subgroups without CRDs (OR 1.77–1.99, p < 0.001) but not in subgroups with CRDs. COPD patients with high post-extubation PaO2 or mild disease severity should be carefully monitored as they have higher re-intubation and mortality rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document