scholarly journals Alterations in the antigen processing-presenting machinery of transformed plasma cells are associated with reduced recognition by CD8+ T cells and characterize the progression of MGUS to multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 115 (6) ◽  
pp. 1185-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vito Racanelli ◽  
Patrizia Leone ◽  
Maria Antonia Frassanito ◽  
Claudia Brunetti ◽  
Federico Perosa ◽  
...  

Abstract We hypothesized that progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to multiple myeloma (MM) reflects the escape of transformed plasma cells from T-cell recognition because of impaired antigen processing-presenting machinery (APM). We studied plasma cells and CD8+ T cells from bone marrow of 20 MGUS patients, 20 MM patients, and 10 control patients. Immunofluorescence and flow cytometry revealed significantly different patterns of APM component expression in plasma cells from the 3 groups. Compared with control patients, MM samples had lower expression of proteasome subunits and peptide transporters and greater expression of chaperones, considering both percentages of stained cells and molecular equivalents of soluble fluorochrome. MGUS samples had intermediate percentages of stained cells but molecular equivalents of soluble fluorochrome similar to control patients. Real-time polymerase chain reaction documented that APM changes occurred at the transcriptional level. Cytotoxicity assays demonstrated that MGUS CD8+ T cells lysed autologous transformed plasma cells more than MM CD8+ T cells did. MGUS progression correlated directly with calnexin, calreticulin, and tapasin and indirectly with δ, LMP2, and LMP10 expression levels; MM disease status did not correlate with APM levels. APM changes may allow transformed plasma cells to elude immunesurveillance in the MGUS-MM pathogenetic sequence.

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4717-4717
Author(s):  
Masha Frenkel ◽  
Zoya Alteber ◽  
Ning Xu ◽  
Mingjie Li ◽  
Haiming Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Blocking inhibitory immune checkpoints holds promise to treat multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, currently available checkpoint inhibitors have not shown significant clinical benefits for MM patients, warranting the need for alternative checkpoint blockers. The immune checkpoint TIGIT was recently shown to be the most upregulated immune inhibitory receptor on CD8+ T cells in MM patients' bone marrow (BM), compared to other checkpoints (Guillerey C., Blood. 2018). Preclinical models demonstrated the dominant effects of TIGIT blockade or depletion, by significantly improving mice survival, reducing myeloma cell numbers and exhausted T cell hallmarks (Minnie S., Blood. 2018). As a result, several clinical trials using anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibodies have been recently initiated in MM patients. The DNAM-1 family, in addition to TIGIT, also includes the inhibitory receptor PVRIG, that competes with the co-activating receptor DNAM-1 for the binding to the shared ligand PVRL2, similarly to the TIGIT/PVR/DNAM-1 interaction. Accordingly, TIGIT and PVRIG co-blockade were shown to synergize in enhancing T cell activity and anti-tumor activity in preclinical models (Whelan S., Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019). PVRL2 together with PVR (ligand of TIGIT) were shown to be highly expressed on plasma cells and on CD14+ cells in BM of MM patients (Lozano E., Clin. Cancer Res. 2020). This study aimed at evaluating DNAM-1 axis receptors expression in MM patients' BM. Methods Fresh BM aspirates were collected from 21 MM patients with progressive disease (PD) or in complete response (CR) after obtaining IRB approval. BM mononuclear cells were isolated and single cell suspensions were obtained followed by staining with anti-human antibodies to evaluate DNAM-1 axis members and PD-1 expression. BM biopsies from 6 MM patients (each patient had 4 core on the Tissue Micro-Array T291 USBiomax) were stained for PVRL2 expression by immuno-histochemistry (IHC). Results Flow cytometry analysis of PD-1 and DNAM-1 axis receptors revealed a significant lower fraction of PD1+ cells among cell populations examined compared with other receptors. TIGIT expression was the highest on NK, CD8+ and NKT cells compared to CD4+ T cells, which is in line with previous published data (Lozano E. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020). In contrast, DNAM-1 was expressed on CD8+ T, NK and NKT cells with prominent high expression on CD4+ T cells (Fig 1A). The highest expression among the receptors was of PVRIG on all lymphoid populations, except CD4+ where DNAM-1 was more highly expressed. Importantly, 50% of CD8+ T cells co-expressed TIGIT and PVRIG, supporting a combinatorial therapeutic approach (Fig. 1B). Additionally, the expression of the PVRL2 ligand on MM plasma and endothelial cells was demonstrated by IHC. FACS analysis further supported PVRL2 expression on plasma cells in MM BM (Fig 2). A higher expression of PVRIG, TIGIT and PD-1 was present on DNAM-1 negative CD8+ T cells (Fig 3A, B), suggesting accumulation of exhausted cells in MM tumor microenvironment (TME) as previously described (Minnie S., Blood. 2018). PVRIG had significantly higher expression on DNAM+ cells, compared to PD-1 and TIGIT (Fig 3C), suggesting the potential of its blockade to enhance DNAM-1 activation and subsequent proliferation of earlier differentiated memory cells in MM TME. Finally, CR patients had a trend for higher DNAM-1 expression on CD8+ T cells compared to those with PD (Fig 3D). This is consistent with other reports in mice showing that the expression of DNAM-1 negatively correlates with BM myeloma cell numbers (Minnie S., Blood. 2018). Conclusions DNAM-1 axis receptors are dominantly expressed on lymphocytes in BM of MM patients, with PVRIG exhibiting the most prominent expression. The reduced expression of DNAM-1 in PD patients' TME, compared to CR patients, suggests a link between DNAM-1 axis and clinical outcomes. Recent data suggest TIGIT is an attractive target for blockade in MM. Our new findings highlight for the first time the dominant expression of PVRIG, as well as TIGIT, and suggest that combined blockade of TIGIT with PVRIG may potentially benefit MM patients, placing the DNAM-1 axis as a dominant pathway in MM therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Frenkel: Compugen Ltd.: Current Employment, Other: in the event of frontal participation, I will be reimbursed for my travel expenses by Compugen Ltd.. Alteber: Compugen Ltd.: Current Employment. Cojocaru: Compugen Ltd.: Current Employment. Ophir: Compugen Ltd.: Current Employment.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3196-3196
Author(s):  
Jooeun Bae ◽  
Teru Hideshima ◽  
Nikhil Munshi ◽  
Kenneth C. Anderson

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy characterized by the clonal proliferation and accumulation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow and development of osteolytic bone lesions. Despite recent advances in treatment using novel therapeutics, MM remains incurable with high mortality rates. We have demonstrated in preclinical studies that CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) generated with immunogenic HLA-A2 or HLA-A24 peptides targeting XBP1(X-box binding protein 1), CD138 (Syndecan-1) and CS1 (SLAMF7) antigens induces robust cytotoxic activities against MM. The Phase 1/2a trials were completed or are in progress in the patients with smoldering multiple myeloma or triple negative breast cancer, respectively, using the HLA-A2 XBP1/CD138/CS1 multipeptide vaccine. The clinical data demonstrated that the multipeptide vaccine is safe and induces the XBP1/CD138/CS1-specific immune responses, evidenced by expansion of peptides-specific Tetramer+/CD45RO+memory CTL and Th-1 specific immune responses. Moreover, clinical trials combining with Lenalidomide or checkpoint inhibitor enhanced the CD8+ CTL activities induced by multipeptide vaccine, indicating the benefit of combination therapy. To expand the breadth and extent of the antigens-specific immunotherapy beyond XBP1/CD138/CS1, we have recently identified additional tumor-associated antigens (TAA) on tumor cells obtained from newly diagnosed MM patients (N=616). Here, we introduce a novel heteroclitic peptides specific to BCMA, the receptor forbinding of B cell activating factor (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL). Due to its restricted expression pattern on MM cells and plasma cells along with its critical role in promoting MM cell growth, survival and drug resistance, we are currently in development of novel immunotherapeutic to target BCMA on MM cells with different therapeutic approaches. Objective: The aims of current study were to target BCMA as a TAA by generating the antigen-specific memory CD8+ CTL to induce effective and long-lasting immune response against MM. Findings: We report on immunogenic HLA-A2-restricted peptides derived from BCMA, which are capable of evoking antigen-specific immune responses against MM. The heteroclitic BCMA peptides displayed improved binding affinity/stability to HLA-A2 molecules from their native BCMA peptides. To define immunogenicity of the selected peptides, we generated BCMA-specific CTL (BCMA-CTL) by repeated stimulationof CD3+ T cells with respective heteroclitic peptide. The BCMA-specific engineered peptides evoked the expansion of antigen-specific CD8+ CTL and generated BCMA-CTL displaying high T cell activation (CD38, CD69) and co-stimulatory (CD40L, OX40, GITR) molecules expression. Additionally, a gradual expansion was observed in BCMA-specific memory CD8+ T cells, with a corresponding decrease in naïve CD8+ T cells. The BCMA-CTL demonstrated robust poly-functional immune responses with Th1-specific anti-MM activities [high IFN-g/IL-2/TNF-aproduction, CD8+ T cells proliferation, cytotoxicity] in antigen-specific and HLA-A2-restricted manner. The functional activities were directly correlated with the expansion of central memory CD8+ CTL in the BCMA-CTL generated from different HLA-A2+ individuals (Donor 1 BCMA-CTL: 81.0%, Donor 2 BCMA-CTL: 82.6%, Donor 3 BCMA-CTL: 67.0%). Finally, the combination with checkpoint inhibitor (anti-LAG3) or immune agonist (anti-OX40) enhanced the anti-tumor activities of BCMA-CTL, along with the induction of cytotoxic activities by central memory CD8+ T cell subset. Therefore, these studies suggest that heteroclitic BCMA peptides offer a therapeutic potential to effectively generate BCMA-specific CD8+ CTL targeting MM. Significance: Here, we introduce novel immunogenic engineered heteroclitic BCMA peptides capable of inducing antigen-specific memory CD8+ CTL with robust poly-functional immune responses against MM. These results provide the framework for therapeutic application of heteroclitic BCMA peptides in MM patients. They further support combination treatment options incorporating BCMA peptides-specific vaccine or BCMA peptides-specific adoptive T cells immunotherapy with anti-LAG3 and/or anti-OX40for patients with myeloma or other diseases expressing BCMA. Disclosures Munshi: OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2102-2102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahesh Yadav ◽  
Cherie Green ◽  
Connie Ma ◽  
Alberto Robert ◽  
Andrew Glibicky ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction:TIGIT (T-cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif [ITIM] domain) is an inhibitory immunoreceptor expressed by T and natural killer (NK) cells that is an important regulator of anti-tumor and anti-viral immunity. TIGIT shares its high-affinity ligand PVR (CD155) with the activating receptor CD226 (DNAM-1). We have recently shown that TIGIT blockade, together with PD-L1/PD-1 blockade, provides robust efficacy in syngeneic tumor and chronic viral infection models. Importantly, CD226 blockade abrogates the benefit of TIGIT blockade, suggesting additional benefit of TIGIT blockade through elaboration of CD226-mediated anti-tumor immunity, analogous to CTLA-4/CD28 regulation of T-cell immunity. Whether TIGIT and CD226 are expressed in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and how TIGIT expression relates to PD-L1/PD-1 expression is unknown. Here we evaluate expression of TIGIT, CD226, PD-1 and PD-L1 in patients with MM to inform novel immunotherapy combinations. Methods:We performed multi-color flow cytometry (n = 25 patients), and multiplex qRT-PCR (n = 7) on bone marrow specimens from patients with MM to assess expression of TIGIT, CD226, PD-1, and PD-L1 on tumor and immune cells. Cells were stained with fluorescently conjugated monoclonal antibodies to label T cells (CD3, CD4, CD8), NK cells (CD56, CD3), plasma cells (CD38, CD45, CD319, CD56), inhibitory/activating receptors (PD-1, TIGIT, PD-L1, CD226), and an amine-reactive viability dye (7-AAD). Stained and fixed cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using BD FACSCanto™ and BD LSRFortessa™. Results:TIGIT, CD226 and PD-L1/PD-1 were detectable by flow cytometry in all patients with MM who were tested, with some overlapping and distinct expression patterns. TIGIT was commonly expressed by marrow-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (median, 65% of cells), CD4+ T cells (median, 12%) and NK cells. In contrast, CD226 was more commonly expressed by marrow-infiltrating CD4+ T cells (median, 74%) compared with CD8+ T cells (median, 38%). PD-1 was expressed by marrow-infiltrating CD8+ T cells (median 38%) and CD4+ T cells (median, 16%). TIGIT was co-expressed with PD-1 on CD8+ T cells (67%-97% TIGIT+ among PD-1+), although many PD-1-negative CD8+ T cells also expressed TIGIT (39%-78% of PD-1-negative). PD-L1 was also expressed by CD8+ (median, 23%) and CD4+ (median, 8%) T cells in addition to MM plasma cells (median, 95%), albeit with significantly lower intensity on T cells compared with plasma cells. The expression of TIGIT and PD-L1 mRNA was highly correlated (R2 = 0.80). Analysis of PVR expression will also be presented. Conclusions: TIGIT, CD226, PD-1, and PD-L1 were commonly expressed in MM bone marrow, but with different patterns. Among CD8+ T cells, the frequency of TIGIT+ T cells was almost twice that of PD-1+ T cells, whereas the majority of CD4+ T cells expressed CD226. TIGIT blockade may complement anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy by activating distinct T-cell/NK-cell subsets with synergistic clinical benefit. These results provide new insight into the immune microenvironment of MM and rationale for targeting both the PD-L1/PD-1 interaction and TIGIT in MM. Disclosures Yadav: Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Green:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Ma:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Robert:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Glibicky:Makro Technologies Inc.: Employment; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy. Nakamura:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Sumiyoshi:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Meng:Genentech, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chu:Genentech Inc.: Employment. Wu:Genentech: Employment. Byon:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Woodard:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Adamkewicz:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Grogan:Genentech, Inc.: Employment. Venstrom:Roche-Genentech: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3241-3241
Author(s):  
Minsuk Kwon ◽  
Eui-Cheol Shin ◽  
Yoon Seok Choi

Programmed cell death (PD)-1/PD-Ligand 1(PD-L1) blockade that reinvigorates exhausted T cells has been approved for the treatment of various solid tumors and hematological malignancies. However, in a clinical trial of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, anti-PD-1 monotherapy did not result in a clinical response. Furthermore, clinical trials of combining PD-1 blockade with immunomodulatory drugs or anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody failed to demonstrate clinical benefits in MM patients. To overcome the limitation of anti-PD-1 therapy in MM, the phenotype and differentiation of CD8+ T cells need to be characterized in the bone marrow (BM) of MM patients, particularly by analyzing myeloma antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. In addition, the role of immunosuppressive factors abundant in the MM microenvironment should be considered, including TGF-β. First, we confirmed the upregulation of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in CD8+ T cells and myeloma cells, respectively, from the BM of MM patients. PD-1-expressing CD8+ T cells from the BM of MM patients co-expressed other checkpoint inhibitory receptors including Tim-3, LAG-3, and TIGIT. We also investigated the expression of T-cell transcription factors, such as T-bet, and EOMES, which are related to T-cell differentiation. In BM from MM patients, PD-1+CD8+ T cells had a higher percentage of EomeshiT-betlo cells than PD-1-CD8+ T cells. These data demonstrate that PD-1-expressing CD8+ T cells from the BM of MM patients exhibit a terminally differentiated phenotype with co-expression of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitory receptors. These results were also observed in BM CD8+ T cells specific to myeloma antigens NY-ESO-1 and HM1.24. Next, we investigated proliferation and cytokine production of BM CD8+ T cells from MM patients. BM CD8+ T cells from MM patients exhibited reduced proliferation and cytokine production upon T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation, compared to BM CD8+ T cells from other control group such as of undetermined significance. However, both anti-PD-1 alone and combined blockade of PD-1 with other immune checkpoint receptors, such as Tim-3, Lag-3, or TIGIT, did not increase the proliferation of BM CD8+ T cells from MM patients. Likewise, anti-PD-1 treatment failed to induce reinvigoration of BM CD8+ T cells stimulated with HLA-A*0201-restricted myeloma antigen peptides, including NY-ESO-1157-165 and HM1.2422-30 peptides. These data demonstrate that blocking PD-1 is not sufficient to restore the function of BM CD8+ T cells from MM patients. It has been known that TGF-β, which is actively secreted by malignant plasma cells and BM stromal cells, can inhibit T-cell responses. We confirmed that the major source of TGF- β1 is plasma cells including myeloma cells among BMMCs from MM patients, and the number of TGF- β1-producing plasma cells, including myeloma cells, is increased in the BM of MM patients. We investigated whether blocking TGF-β signaling enhances reinvigoration of BM CD8+ T cells from MM patients. The combined blockade of PD-1 and TGF- β significantly increased the proliferation of BM CD8+ T cells from MM patients in the presence of TCR stimulation. The production of IFN-γ and TNF by BM CD8+ T cells was also rescued by combined blockade of PD-1 and TGF-β. Moreover, combination of anti-PD-1 antibody and TGF-β inhibitors increased proliferative responses of BM CD8+ T cells from HLA-A2+ MM patients stimulated with a mixture of HLA-A*0201-restricted myeloma antigen peptides (NY-ESO-1157-165 and HM1.2422-30 peptides). Thus, PD-1 blockade reinvigorates BM CD8+ T cells from MM patients in the presence of TGF-β inhibitors. Taken together, BM CD8+ T cells and myeloma antigen-specific CD8+ T cells express increased levels of PD-1 and have a terminally exhausted phenotype in MM patients. Under TGF-β inhibition, anti-PD-1 reinvigorates BM CD8+ T cells from MM patients, but PD-1 blockade alone does not restore the function of BM CD8+ T cells. Blocking both TGF-β and PD-1 can be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of MM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3198-3198
Author(s):  
Yoon Seok Choi ◽  
Minsuk Kwon ◽  
Ik-Chan Song ◽  
Deog-Yeon Jo ◽  
Eui-Cheol Shin

Abstract Immunosuppressive milieu of multiple myeloma is associated with various cellular and non-cellular factors that foster immune escape leading to tumor progression. While immune checkpoint inhibitors have achieved significant clinical success in many types of solid tumors, recent clinical trials of immune checkpoint blockade performed in patients with multiple myeloma failed to demonstrate significant anti-tumor efficacy. To enhance the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in multiple myeloma, elaborate characterization of tumor antigen-specific T cells is an essential prerequisite. In the present study, we investigated the immunophenotypic and functional characteristics of tumor antigen-specific T cells in patients with multiple myeloma. In addition, using direct ex vivo experimental techniques, we tried to examine how to manipulate the immunosuppressive microenvironment to maximize anti-myeloma responses of the tumor-specific T cells. We first tried to define and characterize CD8+ T cell population capable of specifically recognizing and reacting to myeloma cells in bone marrow of myeloma patients using MHC multimer technique. In selected patients, we could successfully define CD8+ T cell population specifically recognizing the HLA-A*0201-restricted epitopes (either "SLLMWITQC" or "LLLGIGILV"), included in myeloma tumor antigens NY-ESO-1 and HM1.24. The vast majority of myeloma-antigen specific CD8+ T cells expressed high level of PD-1 and also co-expressed other types T cell inhibitory receptors. More strikingly, PD-1+ myeloma-specific CD8+ T cells had a distinct pattern of transcriptional factor expression, high level of Eomes and low level of T-bet (EomeshiT-betlo), indicating that they were profoundly exhausted functionally and that a simple blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 binding might not be enough to reinvigorate their anti-myeloma activity. Consistent with the immunophenotypes of myeloma-specific CD8+ T cells, malignant plasma cells in bone marrow of myeloma patients, defined as CD14-CD19-CD138+CS1+CD56hi, also expressed PD-L1 abundantly, compared to normal plasma cells, suggesting that PD-1/PD-L1 axis plays a major role in making myeloma-recognizing T cells unresponsive to TCR stimulation. Interestingly, in addition to tumor cells, various types of immune cells comprising myeloma microenvironment also highly express PD-L1. Indeed, in response to ex vivo TCR stimulation with anti-CD3, CD8+ T cells from myeloma bone marrow showed lower proliferation and reduced production of anti-tumor effector cytokines (INF-γ and TNF-α), compared to marrow-infiltrating CD8+ T cells of diffuse large B cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma patients with extensive bone marrow involvement. However, even in the presence of anti-PD-1, myeloma-specific responses of marrow-infiltrating CD8+ T cells was only modestly improved in terms of proliferation and cytokine production. Next, we investigated whether blocking TGF-β signaling in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade could restore the function of marrow-infiltrating CD8+ T cells of myeloma patients, since TGF-β produced by clonal plasma cells and bone marrow stromal cells is critical in immunosuppressive microenvironment of multiple myeloma. To this end, we found that combination of TGF-β signaling blockade (either anti-TGF-β1 or Galunisertib, a small molecule inhibitor of TGF-β receptor I) with anti-PD-1 significantly increased the frequencies of IFN-γ- and/or TNF-α-producing CD8+ T cells in response to ex vivo TCR stimulation, compared to a single PD-1 or a single TGF-β blockade. Likewise, myeloma antigen-specific proliferation of CD8+ T cells was significantly enhanced with addition of TGF-β signaling blockade. Taken together, although PD-1/PD-L1 axis acts as a major component of immunosuppressive milieu in multiple myeloma, the efficacy of PD-1 blockades in multiple myeloma might be hampered by complicated microenvironment consisting of T cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors. Our results provide an ex vivo evidence of incorporating TGF- β signaling blockade to immune checkpoint inhibition to enhance anti-tumor T cell responses in multiple myeloma Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Author(s):  
Koen A. Marijt ◽  
Lisa Griffioen ◽  
Laura Blijleven ◽  
Sjoerd. H. van der Burg ◽  
Thorbald van Hall

AbstractCancer cells frequently display defects in their antigen-processing pathway and thereby evade CD8 T cell immunity. We described a novel category of cancer antigens, named TEIPP, that emerge on cancers with functional loss of the peptide pump TAP. TEIPPs are non-mutated neoantigens despite their ‘self’ origin by virtue of their absence on normal tissues. Here, we describe the development of a synthetic long peptide (SLP) vaccine for the most immunogenic TEIPP antigen identified thus far, derived from the TAP-independent LRPAP1 signal sequence. LRPAP121–30-specific CD8 T cells were present in blood of all tested healthy donors as well as patients with non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma. SLPs with natural flanking, however, failed to be cross-presented by monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Since the C-terminus of LRPAP121–30 is an unconventional and weakly binding serine (S), we investigated if replacement of this anchor would result in efficient cross-presentation. Exchange into a valine (V) resulted in higher HLA-A2 binding affinity and enhanced T cell stimulation. Importantly, CD8 T cells isolated using the V-variant were able to bind tetramers with the natural S-variant and respond to TAP-deficient cancer cells. A functional screen with an array of N-terminal and C-terminal extended SLPs pointed at the 24-mer V-SLP, elongated at the N-terminus, as most optimal vaccine candidate. This SLP was efficiently cross-presented and consistently induced a strong polyclonal LRPAP121–30-specific CD8 T cells from the endogenous T cell repertoire. Thus, we designed a TEIPP SLP vaccine from the LRPAP1 signal sequence ready for validation in clinical trials.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alissa Visram ◽  
Surendra Dasari ◽  
Emilie Anderson ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Taxiarchis V. Kourelis

AbstractImmunotherapy has shown efficacy in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). However, these therapies may depend on a functional tumor immune microenvironment (iTME) for their efficacy. Characterizing the evolution of the iTME over the disease course is necessary to optimize the timing of immunotherapies. We performed mass cytometry, cytokine analysis, and RNA sequencing on bone marrow samples from 39 (13 newly diagnosed [NDMM], 11 relapsed pre-daratumumab exposure [RMM], and 13 triple-refractory [TRMM]) MM patients. Three distinct cellular iTME clusters were identified; cluster 1 comprised mainly of NDMM and RMM patients; and clusters 2 and 3 comprised primarily of TRMM patients. We showed that naive T cells were decreased in clusters 2 and 3, cluster 2 was characterized by increased senescent T cells, and cluster 3 by decreased early memory T cells. Plasma cells in clusters 2 and 3 upregulated E2F transcription factors and MYC proliferation pathways, and downregulated interferon, TGF-beta, interleuking-6, and TNF-αlpha signaling pathways compared to cluster 1. This study suggests that the MM iTME becomes increasingly dysfunctional with therapy whereas the MM clone may be less dependent on inflammation-mediated growth pathways and less sensitive to IFN-mediated immunosurveillance. Our findings may explain the decreased sensitivity of TRMM patients to novel immunotherapies.


2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 2642-2651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Ayyoub ◽  
Marco Migliaccio ◽  
Philippe Guillaume ◽  
Danielle Liénard ◽  
Jean-Charles Cerottini ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 135 (15) ◽  
pp. 1232-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kodandaram Pillarisetti ◽  
Suzanne Edavettal ◽  
Mark Mendonça ◽  
Yingzhe Li ◽  
Mark Tornetta ◽  
...  

Abstract T-cell–mediated approaches have shown promise in myeloma treatment. However, there are currently a limited number of specific myeloma antigens that can be targeted, and multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease. G-protein–coupled receptor class 5 member D (GPRC5D) is expressed in MM and smoldering MM patient plasma cells. Here, we demonstrate that GPRC5D protein is present on the surface of MM cells and describe JNJ-64407564, a GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody that recruits CD3+ T cells to GPRC5D+ MM cells and induces killing of GPRC5D+ cells. In vitro, JNJ-64407564 induced specific cytotoxicity of GPRC5D+ cells with concomitant T-cell activation and also killed plasma cells in MM patient samples ex vivo. JNJ-64407564 can recruit T cells and induce tumor regression in GPRC5D+ MM murine models, which coincide with T-cell infiltration at the tumor site. This antibody is also able to induce cytotoxicity of patient primary MM cells from bone marrow, which is the natural site of this disease. GPRC5D is a promising surface antigen for MM immunotherapy, and JNJ-64407564 is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 clinical trial in patients with relapsed or refractory MM (NCT03399799).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document