Patients with Multiple Myeloma on Anti-CD38 or Anti-BCMA Based Regimens and Patients with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia Under Rituximab or BTK Inhibitors Have a Poor Humoral Response Following COVID-19 Vaccination

Abstract Introduction: Recent data suggest a suboptimal antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with hematological malignancies. Herein, we evaluated the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with plasma cell neoplasms (PCNs) after vaccination with either the mRNA BNT162b2 or viral vector AZD1222 vaccine, up to 50 days post their first vaccine dose. Methods: This is an ongoing large prospective study (NCT04743388) evaluating the kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination in healthy subjects and in patients with hematological malignancies or solid tumors. Here we present the data on patients with PCNs in comparison to controls of similar age and gender, who were vaccinated during the same time period (January to March 2021) in Athens (Greece). Major exclusion criteria for both patients and controls included the presence of: (i) autoimmune disorder under immunosuppressive therapy or other active malignant disease; (ii) HIV or active hepatitis B and C infection, (iii) end-stage renal disease and (iv) prior diagnosis of COVID-19. Serum was collected on day 1 (D1; before the first vaccine dose), on day 22 (D22; before the second dose of the BNT162b2 or 3 weeks post the first AZD1222 dose) and on day 50 (D50; 4 weeks post second dose of the BNT162b2 or 7 weeks post the first AZD1222 dose). NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 were measured using an FDA approved-ELISA methodology (cPass™ SARS-CoV-2 NAbs Detection Kit, GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Results: We evaluated 382 patients with PCNs after vaccination with either the BNT162b2 or the AZD1222 vaccine. Patients with MM (n=213), WM (n=106), SMM (n=38) and MGUS (n=25) and 226 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Of MM/SMM/MGUS patients, 215 (77.9%) were vaccinated with the BNT162b2 and 61 (22.1%) with the AZD1222 vaccine, while out of 106 WM patients 90 (84.9%) were vaccinated with the BNT162b2 and 16 (15.1%) with the AZD1222 vaccine. Vaccination with either two doses of the BNT162b2 or one dose of the AZD1222 vaccine led to lower production of NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 in patients compared with controls both on day 22 and on day 50 (P<0.001 for all comparisons). After the first dose of the vaccine, on D22, the patient group had lower NAb titers compared with controls: the median NAb inhibition titer was 27% (IQR: 15.3-42%) for MM/SMM/MGUS versus 20.5% (IQR: 10-37%) for WM patients versus 38.7% (IQR: 22-54.3%) for controls (P<0.001 for all comparisons). On D50 the median NAb inhibition titer was 62.8% (IQR: 26-88.9%) for MM/SMM/MGUS versus 36% (IQR: 18-78%) for WM patients versus 90% (IQR: 58-96.4%) for controls (P<0.001 for all comparisons). 57.3% MM/SMM/MGUS, 42% WM patients and 81% controls developed NAb titers ≥50% (p<0.001 for patients versus controls). Furthermore, MM patients showed an inferior NAb response compared with MGUS on day 22 (p=0.009) and on day 50 (p=0.003). Importantly, active treatment with either anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies or belantamab mafodotin and lymphopenia at the time of vaccination were independent prognostic factors for suboptimal antibody response following vaccination in MM (p<0.05). Disease-related immune dysregulation and therapy-related immunosuppression were involved in the low humoral response in patients with WM. Importantly, active treatment with either rituximab or Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKIs) was proven as an independent prognostic factor for suboptimal antibody response following vaccination in WM (p<0.05). Regarding adverse events, 33% and 31.6% patients reported mild reactions after the first and second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, respectively; 32.8% patients vaccinated with the first dose of AZD1222 also presented with local reactions. Conclusion: Patients with MM and WM have a low humoral response following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially those who are under treatment with anti-CD38-, anti-BCMA-, anti-CD20- or BTKIs-based regimens. This result suggest that these patients have to continue the protective measures against SARS-CoV-2 as they are at high risk for COVID-19. Further studies on the kinetics of immune subpopulations following COVID-19 vaccination will elucidate the underlying immune landscape and determine the potential need for additional booster vaccine doses or protective administration of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in MM/WM patients with poor response after full vaccination. Disclosures Terpos: Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gavriatopoulou: Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Kastritis: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Dimopoulos: Janssen: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Poor Neutralizing Antibody Responses in Patients with CLL, NHL and HL after Vaccination Against Sars-Cov-2; A Prospective Study in 132 Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145110 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3752-3752

Author(s):

Evangelos Terpos ◽

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

Despina Fotiou ◽

Chara Giatra ◽

John V. Asimakopoulos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antibody Response ◽

Prospective Study ◽

Active Treatment ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematological Malignancies ◽

Viral Inhibition ◽

Age And Gender ◽

And Gender ◽

Humoral Responses ◽

Kinetics Of

Abstract Introduction: Recent data suggest a suboptimal antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with hematological malignancies, especially under therapy with monoclonal antibodies targeting B-cells. Herein, we evaluated the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL) after vaccination with the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine, up to 50 days post their first vaccine dose. Methods: This is a large prospective study (NCT04743388) evaluating the kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination in healthy subjects and patients with hematological malignancies. We report here the results in CLL, NHL and HL patients in comparison to age- and gender-matched controls who were vaccinated at the same time period (January to May 2021). After vein puncture, the serum of both patients and controls was collected on day 1 (D1; before the first BNT162b2 dose), on day 22 (D22; before the second dose of the BNT162b2) and on day 50 (D50; 3 weeks post second dose of the BNT162b2). Serum was separated within 4 hours from blood collection and stored at -80°C until the day of measurement. NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 were measured using FDA approved methodology (ELISA, cPass™ SARS-CoV-2 NAbs Detection Kit; GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA) on the abovementioned timepoints. A NAb titer of at least 30% is considered as positive, according to manufacturer, whereas a NAb titer of at least 50% has been associated with clinically relevant viral inhibition [Walsh et al. N Engl J Med 2020, 383, 2439-50]. Samples of the same individual were measured in the same ELISA plate. Results: We evaluated 132 patients with CLL/Lymphomas after vaccination with the BNT162b2. Patient population included 53 with CLL, 57 with NHL and 22 with HL, while 214 healthy controls, of similar age and gender, were also studied. At the time of vaccination, 30% (n=40) of patients had asymptomatic disease and out of 92 symptomatic patients, 49% (n=45) were on active treatment. Vaccination with two doses of the BNT162b2 led to lower production of NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 in patients compared with controls, both on day 22 and on day 50 (P<0.001 for all comparisons) for all subgroups. After the first dose of the vaccine, on D22, the patient group had lower NAb titers compared with controls: the median NAb inhibition titer was 18% (IQR: 8.5-29%) for patients versus 41.6% (IQR: 25.3-59%) for controls; p<0.001. On D50, the median NAb inhibition titer was 32.5% (IQR: 13.5-93%) for patients versus 94.7% (IQR: 89-97%) for controls; p<0.001. More specifically, only 50.8% (67/132) of the patients versus 98.1% (210/214) of the controls developed NAb titers ≥30% and 43.9% (58/132) of patients versus 95.3% (204/214) titers ≥50% (high protective titers) at day 50 (p<0.0001 for all comparisons; Figure-left part). Importantly, active treatment (which included anti-CD antibodies, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, a combination of the above, chemotherapy-only regimens or Bcl-2 inhibitors) was an independent prognostic factor for suboptimal antibody response at day 50 (<50%) in the patient subgroup (p<0.001). Rituximab administration in the last 12 months correlated with decreased antibody response at day 50 (p<0.01). Patients with HL were more likely to achieve humoral responses (>50% at day 50) compared to other disease types (p<0.05; Figure-right part). Disease-related immune dysregulation and therapy-related immunosuppression were therefore involved in the low humoral responses seen in patients. Regarding adverse events, 9% and 9.8% patients reported mild reactions after the first and second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with CLL/NHL/HL have a low humoral response following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, particularly patients who are on active treatment with rituximab or BTK inhibitors. These patient subgroups therefore should continue utilizing protective measures against SARS-CoV-2 (masks, social distancing, etc) as they are at high risk for COVID-19. Further studies on the kinetics of immune subpopulations following COVID-19 vaccination will elucidate the underlying immune landscape and determine the potential need for additional booster vaccine doses or protective administration of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in CLL/NHL/HL patients with poor response after full vaccination. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Terpos: Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gavriatopoulou: Janssen: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria. Baltadakis: Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Alexion: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel Grants; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Genesis Pharma: Other: Travel Grants; Gilead: Other: Travel Grants; WinMedica: Other: Travel Grants; Baxalta Hellas: Other: Travel Grants. Dimopoulos: BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of a Third BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Dose in Patients with CLL who Failed Standard Two-dose Vaccination

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.2021014085 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yair Herishanu ◽

Galia Rahav ◽

Shai Levi ◽

Andrei Braester ◽

Gilad Itchaki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antibody Response ◽

Neutralizing Antibodies ◽

Response Rate ◽

Vaccine Dose ◽

Humoral Response ◽

Response Rates ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Vaccination Regimen ◽

The Third ◽

Anti Cd20

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have an impaired antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. Here, we evaluated the antibody response to a third BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in patients with CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who failed to achieve a humoral response after standard two-dose vaccination regimen. Anti-SARS-CoV-2S and neutralizing antibodies were measured 3 weeks after administration of the third dose. In 172 patients with CLL the antibody response rate was 23.8%. Response rate among actively treated patients (12.0%, n=12/100) was lower compared to treatment-naïve patients (40.0%, n=16/40; OR=4.9, 95% CI 1.9-12.9; p<0.001) and patients off-therapy (40.6%, n=13/32; OR=5.0, 95% CI 1.8-14.1; p<0.001), (p<0.001). In those actively treated with BTK inhibitors or venetoclax ± anti-CD20 antibody, response rates were extremely low (15.3%, n=9/59 and 7.7%, n=3/39, respectively). Only one of the 28 patients (3.6%) treated with anti-CD20 antibodies <12 months prior to vaccination responded. The anti-SARS-CoV-2S antibody levels correlated linearly with neutralizing antibody titers (r=0.732, p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the independent variables that were associated with response included lack of active therapy (OR=5.6, 95% CI 2.3-13.8; p<0.001) and serum IgA levels ≥80 mg/dL (OR=5.8, 95% CI 2.1-15.9; p<0.001) In conclusion, in patients with CLL/SLL who failed to achieve a humoral response after standard two-dose BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination regimen, close to a quarter responded to the third dose of vaccine. The antibody response rates were lower during active treatment and in patients with a recent exposure (<12 months prior to vaccination) to anti-CD20 therapy.

Download Full-text

Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Prior COVID-19 Have Superior Antibody Responses Against Sars-Cov-2 Compared with Fully Vaccinated Myeloma Patients with the BNT162b2 Vaccine

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145487 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3802-3802

Author(s):

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

Evangelos Terpos ◽

Panagiotis Malandrakis ◽

Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos ◽

Alexandros Briasoulis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Active Treatment ◽

Neutralizing Antibodies ◽

Research Funding ◽

Severe Disease ◽

Humoral Response ◽

Autoimmune Disorder ◽

P Value ◽

Treatment Type ◽

Stage Renal Disease

Abstract Introduction: Recent data suggest a suboptimal antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), especially under treatment. Herein, we evaluated the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 in non-vaccinated MM patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 compared to MM patients after full vaccination with the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine. Methods: The analysis was performed in the context of an ongoing large prospective study (NCT04743388) evaluating the kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination. We evaluated MM patients diagnosed with COVID-19, confirmed by PCR, matched for age, gender, line of treatment, type of myeloma, type of treatment and response with vaccinated MM patients during the same time period (January - May 2021). Major exclusion criteria for both COVID-19 and vaccine MM groups included the presence of: (i) autoimmune disorder under immunosuppressive therapy or other active cancer; (ii) active HIV, hepatitis B and C infection, and (iii) end-stage renal disease . Serum was collected at 4 th week post confirmed diagnosis for the COVID-19 MM group and at 4 th week post the second BNT162b2 dose for the vaccine MM group. NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 were measured using an FDA approved methodology (cPass™ SARS-CoV-2 NAbs Detection Kit, GenScript, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Results: We evaluated 35 patients with MM and COVID-19 (6 had smoldering MM and 29 symptomatic MM), along with 35 matched MM patients who received the BNT162b2 vaccine. Among COVID-19 MM patients, 13 were diagnosed with mild, 12 with moderate and 10 with severe disease; 22/35 patients were hospitalized and 10/35 were intubated. Seven (20%) patients died due to COVID-19. During the disease course 21 patients (60%) were treated with dexamethasone. Type of treatment was not different between COVID-19 positive and vaccinated MM patients. Between the two patient groups, there was no difference in terms of age [median (IQR) 65 (59) for COVID-19 positive versus 66 (74) for COVID-19 vaccinated, respectively, p=0.76], gender [males: 19/35 (54.3%) versus 16/35 (45.7%), respectively, p=0.47), BMI (median 27 versus 26kg/m 2, respectively, p=0.56), asymptomatic disease [6/35 (18.2%) in both groups, p=1], prior lines of treatment [range: 1 to 7 versus 1 to 6, respectively, p=0.99], and type of treatment (p=0.87). Among the COVID-19 MM patients, 6 (20.7%) were in sCR/CR, 6 (20.7%) in VGPR, 12 (41.4%) patients in PR, 2 (6.9%) in MR/SD and one (3.5%) in PD at the time of confirmed infection. Among the vaccinated MM group, 10 (34.5%) patientswere in sCR/CR, 4 (13.8%) in VGPR, 11 (37.9%) in PR, one (3.5%) in MR/SD and one (3.5%) in PD at the time of vaccination (p-value=0.93 for the comparison between COVID-19 and vaccinated MM groups). No differences between COVID-19 and vaccinated MM patients were also noted regarding the median lymphocyte count (1200/μl versus 1400/μl, respectively, p=0.08) and the median immunoglobulin values (IgG 732 mg/dl versus 747 mg/dl, respectively, p=0.29; IgA 9 mg/dl versus 61 mg/dl, respectively, p=0.7; IgM 26 mg/dl versus 25 mg/dl, p=0.97). The incidence of comorbidities was also similar between the two groups (cardiovascular diseases 55.2% versus 44.8%, respectively, p=0.47; diabetes mellitus 66.7% versus 33.3%, p=0.28; chronic pulmonary disease 50% each, p=1.0). Interestingly, patients with MM and COVID-19 showed a superior humoral response compared with vaccinated MM patients. The median (IQR) NAb titers were 87.6% (IQR: 71.6-94) and 58.7% (21.4-91.8) for COVID-19 and for vaccinated MM patients, respectively (p=0.01). In both groups, 27 out of 35 patients were receiving active treatment for MM at the time of NAb evaluation. The median NAb titer was 88% (IQR 71.6%-96.3%) for COVID-19 MM patients and 35.4% (IQR 17.5%-85.5%) for vaccinated MM patients who received anti-myeloma therapy (p=0.001). Importantly, there was no difference in NAb production between COVID-19 and vaccinated MM patients who did not receive any treatment (median NAb titers, 85.1% versus 91.7%, p=0.14). Conclusion: Patients with MM and COVID-19 present a superior NAb response against SARS-CoV-2 compared with fully vaccinated patients with the BNT162b2 vaccine. This finding was more pronounced among patients receiving active treatment for MM. In this context, additional booster doses may be considered for MM patients with poor humoral response after the BNT162b2 vaccine. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gavriatopoulou: Genesis: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Terpos: BMS: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kastritis: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria. Dimopoulos: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The neutralizing antibody response post COVID-19 vaccination in patients with myeloma is highly dependent on the type of anti-myeloma treatment

Blood Cancer Journal ◽

10.1038/s41408-021-00530-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (8) ◽

Author(s):

Evangelos Terpos ◽

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos ◽

Alexandros Briasoulis ◽

Sentiljana Gumeni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antibody Response ◽

Neutralizing Antibodies ◽

Hematological Malignancies ◽

Humoral Response ◽

Neutralizing Antibody ◽

Control Measures ◽

Infection Control Measures ◽

Plasma Cell Neoplasms ◽

Lower Production ◽

Response Post

AbstractRecent data suggest a suboptimal antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with hematological malignancies. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 were evaluated in 276 patients with plasma cell neoplasms after vaccination with either the BNT162b2 or the AZD1222 vaccine, on days 1 (before the first vaccine shot), 22, and 50. Patients with MM (n = 213), SMM (n = 38), and MGUS (n = 25) and 226 healthy controls were enrolled in the study (NCT04743388). Vaccination with either two doses of the BNT162b2 or one dose of the AZD1222 vaccine leads to lower production of NAbs in patients with MM compared with controls both on day 22 and on day 50 (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Furthermore, MM patients showed an inferior NAb response compared with MGUS on day 22 (p = 0.009) and on day 50 (p = 0.003). Importantly, active treatment with either anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) or belantamab mafodotin and lymphopenia at the time of vaccination were independent prognostic factors for suboptimal antibody response following vaccination. In conclusion, MM patients have low humoral response following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially under treatment with anti-CD38 or belamaf. This underlines the need for timely vaccination, possibly during a treatment-free period, and for continuous vigilance on infection control measures in non-responders.

Download Full-text

Poor neutralizing antibody responses in 106 patients with WM after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2; a prospective study

Blood Advances ◽

10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005444 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Maria Gavriatopoulou ◽

Evangelos Terpos ◽

Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos ◽

Alexandros Briasoulis ◽

Sentiljana Gumeni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Neutralizing Antibodies ◽

Hematological Malignancies ◽

Kinase Inhibitors ◽

Vaccine Development ◽

Humoral Response ◽

Neutralizing Antibody ◽

Control Measures ◽

Infection Control Measures ◽

A Prospective Study ◽

Lower Production

The urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to accelerated vaccine development within less than a year. Immunocompromised patients with hematological malignancies are more susceptible to COVID-19 and at higher risk of severe complications and worse outcomes compared with general population. In this context, we evaluated the humoral response by determining the titers of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) after vaccination with the BNT162b2 or AZD1222 vaccine. An FDA-approved, ELISA-based methodology was implemented to evaluate NAbs on the day of the first vaccine shot, as well as on day 22 and 50 afterwards. 106 patients with WM (43% males, median age 73 years) and 212 healthy controls (46% males, median age 66 years) who were vaccinated during the same period, at the same center were enrolled in the study (which is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04743388). Our data indicate that vaccination with either 2 doses of the BNT162b2 or 1 dose of the AZD1222 vaccine leads to lower production of NAbs against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with WM compared with controls both on day 22 and on day 50 (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Disease-related immune dysregulation and therapy-related immunosuppression are involved in the low humoral response. Importantly, active treatment with either Rituximab or Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors was proven as an independent prognostic factor for suboptimal antibody response following vaccination. In conclusion, patients with WM have low humoral response following COVID-19 vaccination, which underlines the need for timely vaccination ideally during a treatment-free period and for continuous vigilance on infection control measures.

Download Full-text

More rapid, robust and sustainable antibody responses to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in convalescent COVID-19 individuals

10.1101/2021.08.04.21261561 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Sabrina E Racine-Brzostek ◽

Jim Yee ◽

Ashley Sukhu ◽

Yuqing Qiu ◽

Sophie Rand ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Longitudinal Study ◽

Antibody Response ◽

Real World ◽

Neutralizing Antibodies ◽

Vaccine Dose ◽

Antibody Responses ◽

Antibody Levels

Longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine antibody response under real-world conditions. This longitudinal study investigated the quantity and quality of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in 846 specimens from 350 subjects: comparing BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals (19 previously diagnosed with COVID-19 [RecoVax]; 49 never been diagnosed [NaiveVax]) to 122 hospitalized unvaccinated (HospNoVax) and 160 outpatient unvaccinated (OutPtNoVax) COVID-19 patients. NaiveVax experienced a delay in generating SARS-CoV-2 total antibody levels (TAb) and neutralizing antibodies (SNAb) after the 1st vaccine dose (D1), but a rapid increase in antibody levels was observed after the 2nd dose (D2). However, these never reached the robust levels observed in RecoVax. In fact, NaiveVax TAb and SNAb levels decreased 4-weeks post-D2 (p=0.003;p<0.001). For the most part, RecoVax TAb persisted throughout this study, after reaching maximal levels 2-weeks post-D2; but SNAb decreased significantly ~6-months post-D1 (p=0.002). Although NaiveVax avidity lagged behind that of RecoVax for most of the follow-up periods, NaiveVax did reach similar avidity by ~6-months post-D1. These data suggest that one vaccine dose elicits maximal antibody response in RecoVax and may be sufficient. Also, despite decreasing levels in TAb and SNAb overtime, long-term avidity maybe a measure worth evaluating and possibly correlating to vaccine efficacy.

Download Full-text

Function is more reliable than quantity to follow up the humoral response to the Receptor Binding Domain of SARS- CoV-2 Spike Protein after Natural Infection or COVID-19 vaccination

10.1101/2021.06.02.21257975 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Carlos A Sariol ◽

Petraleigh Pantoja ◽

Crisanta Serrano-Collazo ◽

Tiffant Rosa-Arocho ◽

Albersy Armina ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Response ◽

Neutralizing Antibodies ◽

Natural Infection ◽

Vaccine Dose ◽

Humoral Response ◽

Neutralizing Antibody ◽

Viral Neutralization ◽

Neutralizing Activity ◽

Robust Immune Response

On this work we report that despite of a decline in the total anti-Spike antibodies the neutralizing antibodies remains at a similar level for an average of 98 days in a longitudinal cohort of 59 Hispanic/Latino exposed to SARS-CoV-2. We are also reporting that the percentage of neutralization correlates with the IgG titers and that in the first collected samples, IgG1 was the predominant isotype (62.71%), followed by IgG4 (15.25%), IgG3 (13.56%), and IgG2 (8.47%) during the tested period. The IgA was detectable in 28.81% of subjects. Only 62.71% of all subjects have detectable IgM in the first sample despite of confirmed infection by a molecular method. Our data suggests that 100% that seroconvert make detectable neutralizing antibody responses measured by a surrogate viral neutralization test. We also found that the IgG titers and neutralizing activity were higher after the first dose in 10 vaccinated subjects out of the 59 with prior infection compare to a subgroup of 21 subjects naive to SARS-CoV-2. One dose was enough but two were necessary to reach the maximum percentage of neutralization in subjects with previous natural infection or naive to SARS-CoV-2 respectively. Like the pattern seen after the natural infection, after the second vaccine dose, the total anti-S antibodies and titers declined but not the neutralizing activity which remains at same levels for more than 80 days after the first vaccine dose. That decline, however, was significantly lower in pre-exposed individuals which denotes the contribution of the natural infection priming a more robust immune response to the vaccine. Also, our data indicates that the natural infection induces a more robust humoral immune response than the first vaccine dose in unexposed subjects. However, the difference was significant only when the neutralization was measured but not by assessing the total anti-S antibodies or the IgG titers. This work is an important contribution to understand the natural immune response to the novel coronavirus in a population severely hit by the virus. Also provide an invaluable data by comparing the dynamic of the immune response after the natural infection vs. the vaccination and suggesting that a functional test is a better marker than the presence or not of antibodies. On this context our results are also highly relevant to consider standardizing methods that in addition to serve as a tool to follow up the immune response to the vaccines may also provide a correlate of protection.

Download Full-text

Kinetics of epsilon antitoxin antibodies in different strategies for active immunization of lambs against enterotoxaemia

Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira ◽

10.1590/s0100-736x2013000800005 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 33 (8) ◽

pp. 979-982

Author(s):

Heni F. Costa ◽

Selene D. Babboni ◽

Carlos F.C. Rodrigues ◽

Carlos R. Padovani ◽

Iveraldo S. Dutra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Indirect Elisa ◽

Small Ruminants ◽

Vaccine Dose ◽

Humoral Response ◽

Active Immunization ◽

Common Disease ◽

Post Vaccination ◽

Type D ◽

Epsilon Toxin ◽

Kinetics Of

Enterotoxaemia, a common disease that affects domestic small ruminants, is mainly caused by the epsilon toxin of Clostridium perfringens type D. The present study tested four distinct immunization protocols to evaluate humoral response in lambs, a progeny of non-vaccinated sheep during gestation. Twenty-four lambs were randomly allocated into four groups according to age (7, 15, 30 and 45 days), receiving the first dose of epsilon toxoid commercial vaccine against clostridiosis with booster after 30 days post vaccination. Indirect ELISA was performed after the first vaccine dose and booster to evaluate the immune response of the lambs. Results showed that for the four protocols tested all lambs presented serum title considered protective (≥0.2UI/ml epsilon antitoxin antibodies) and also showed that the anticipation of primovaccination of lambs against enterotoxaemia conferred serum title considered protective allowing the optimization of mass vaccination of lambs.

Download Full-text

583. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein S1/S2 Antibodies after Vaccination with Sinopharm in Peruvian Physicians

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofab466.781 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S394-S394

Author(s):

Maria Lopera ◽

Romina Vera ◽

Carlos Tapia ◽

Carlos Cabrera ◽

Jose Gonzales-Zamora ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Negative Correlation ◽

Neutralizing Antibodies ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Vaccine Dose ◽

Humoral Response ◽

Spike Protein ◽

Healthcare Personnel ◽

Study Cohort ◽

Antibody Titers ◽

Response Post

Abstract Background Peru started its national vaccination campaign in February 2021 using Sinopharm vaccine, targeting healthcare personnel on its initial phase. Although the immunogenicity of this vaccine was tested in clinical trials, there are no studies that evaluated the humoral response post vaccination in Peru. Methods We conducted a cross sectional study, which objective was to evaluate the humoral immunogenicity triggered by the Sinopharm vaccine in Peruvian physicians. We collected demographic and epidemiologic data via an electronic. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1/S2 antibodies were measured by chemiluminescense (Liaison®). A positive test was defined as >15 U/ml, which has correlation of 95% with neutralizing antibodies measured by plaque reduction neutralizing test. Results 92 participants were enrolled in the study. The epidemiologic characteristics are described in table 1. The mean level of antibodies measured at least 2 weeks from the second vaccine dose was 67.5 ± 70.5 U/ml. 85.7% of the study cohort had positive S1/S2 antibodies. In the univariate analysis, an imperfect negative correlation was found between the level of antibodies and participants’ age (r= -0.24; regression F test 5.25; p = 0.0242). A weak negative correlation was observed between the antibody titer and the time elapsed from the second vaccine dose and the day of antibody measurement (r= -0.17). A higher antibody level post vaccine was found in individuals who worked in COVID units (105.5 U / mL vs 58.2 U / mL; p = 0.0125), and in participants with history of COVID (216.5 U / mL vs 81.2 U / mL; p = < 0.0000). Hypertension was associated with lower antibody titers (36.9 U / mL vs. 74.6; p = 0.0464). In the multivariate analysis, working in COVID units, having previous COVID infection and shorter time from second vaccine dose and day of antibody measurement were associated with higher antibody levels post vaccine (table 2). Conclusion Our study showed that the time elapsed from the second vaccine dose and the day of antibody measurement, having previous COVID-19 infection and working in COVID -19 units may help to predict higher antibody titers post vaccine. Larger studies to evaluate the humoral response post Sinopharm vaccine and its clinical implications are still needed in Peru. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

Quality and Kinetics of the Antibody Response in Mice after Three Different Low-Dose Influenza Virus Vaccination Strategies

Clinical and Vaccine Immunology ◽

10.1128/cvi.00033-07 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 14 (8) ◽

pp. 978-983 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Solveig Hauge ◽

Abdullah Madhun ◽

Rebecca Jane Cox ◽

Lars Reinhardt Haaheim

Keyword(s):

Antibody Response ◽

Low Dose ◽

Serum Antibody ◽

Vaccine Dose ◽

Serum Antibody Response ◽

Vaccination Strategies ◽

Human Dose ◽

Normal Human ◽

Kinetics Of ◽

Human Vaccine

ABSTRACT The threat of a new influenza pandemic has led to renewed interest in dose-sparing vaccination strategies such as intradermal immunization and the use of adjuvanted vaccines. In this study we compared the quality and kinetics of the serum antibody response elicited in mice after one or two immunizations with a split influenza A (H3N2) virus, using three different low-dose vaccination strategies. The mice were divided into four groups, receiving either a low-dose vaccine (3 μg hemagglutinin [HA]) intradermally or intramuscularly with or without aluminum adjuvant or the normal human vaccine dose (15 μg HA) intramuscularly. Sera were collected weekly after vaccination and tested in the hemagglutination inhibition, virus neutralization, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The antibody responses induced after intradermal or intramuscular low-dose vaccinations were similar and lower than those observed after the human vaccine dose. However, low-dose adjuvanted vaccine elicited a serum antibody response comparable to that elicited by the human dose, although the second immunization did not result in any increase in cross-reactive hemagglutination inhibition antibodies, and the peak serum antibody response was observed 1 week later than in the other vaccination groups. Our murine data suggest that the low-dose intradermal route does not show any obvious advantage over the low-dose intramuscular route in inducing a serum antibody response and that none of the low-dose vaccination strategies is as effective as intramuscular vaccination with the normal human dose. However, the low-dose aluminum-adjuvanted vaccine could present a feasible alternative in case of limited vaccine supply.

Download Full-text