Universally Observed Loss of BCL7A Allows Activation of IRF4 and Its Transcriptional Activity in Multiple Myeloma Cells

Abstract Integrated genomic analysis including whole genome and RNA sequencing in primary multiple myeloma (MM) cells have reported a universal loss of BCL7A gene in MM patients compared to normal plasma cells (PC). Our Genetic modulation in in-vitro and in-vivo MM models have also validated the loss of BCL7A as an oncogenic event responsible for acquisition of a more proliferative phenotype in MM cells. We performed a comparative mass spectrometric analysis confirming BCL7A as a member of the canonical m-SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex. We therefore performed the Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) to assess genome-wide changes in DNA accessibility upon BCL7A gain or loss. We found that loss of BCL7A in wild-type KMS12BM and NCI-H929 cells resulted in enrichment of important transcription factor motifs in the transcriptionally active sites of chromatin. We identified 36 de novo accessible and 1079 de novo inaccessible regions across the genome after BCL7A shRNA KD (knock-down). These genomic regions with altered accessibility were associated with genes involved in protein binding (FDR < 0.001), GTPase activation (FDR = 0.016), and GTPase regulation (FDR = 0.030). Candidate transcription factors for the genomic regions with altered accessibility were identified by querying a database of human ChiP-seq experiments (ReMap 2020). IRF4 was identified to be enriched in regions of accessible chromatin upon BCL7A loss. IRF4 is an oncoprotein transcription factor and is a direct target of myc, generating a feedback loop in MM cells. IRF4 dependency is central to myeloma cell proliferation. Most importantly, we found that in addition to functions within the m-SWI/SNF complex, BCL7A forms a protein complex with IRF4. Altogether these data suggest a role for BCL7A in driving IRF4 oncogenic activities in MM. To understand how BCL7A-dependent changes may influence IRF4 activity, we performed CHiP assay using IRF4 antibody in BCL7A KO (knock-out) and AB (add-back) KMS12BM and NCI-H929 cells. We observed increased binding of IRF4 to the promoter of its target genes like PRDM1, CDK6, STAG2, PIM2, SQLE, Myc, CANX, IRF4, SCD, ELL2, CASP3 in BCL7A KO cells, while the binding of these target genes was significantly decreased in AB cells. While, CHiP assay using IRF4 antibody in control and ectopically expressed BCL7A in AMO1 and KMS11 cells showed significantly low binding of IRF4 to the promoter of most of its target genes in BCL7A overexpressed cells compared to control. Integrated transcriptomic analysis following BCL7A KD and overexpression revealed the existence of a set of genes transcriptionally regulated by IRF4 to be significantly upregulated following BCL7A depletion and downregulated following ectopic expression of BCL7A. To investigate whether these genes are involved in the phenotypic and functional effects observed in MM after BCL7A depletion, we performed LOF studies (si-RNA screen) in scrambled and BCL7A KD MM cells. Among others, we observed that MM cells are highly sensitive to the inhibition of EEF1B2, RPS3A, SOX2, DCC and NDUFA1 only in the context of BCL7A loss, implicating a role as critical effector molecules downstream of the IRF4-BCL7A transcriptional network. In conclusion, we observe that BCL7A binds to IRF4, functionally restricting its activity. The universally observed down regulation of BCL7A in MM provides the necessary molecular change to allow IRF4 to exert its required transcriptional activity to induce MM cell growth. Our results now provide the basis to understand the mechanism of development of IRF4 dependency in MM. Disclosures Anderson: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium-Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Scientific Founder of Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Mana Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Munshi: Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: scientific founder, Patents & Royalties; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Evolving Unmet Need in Patients Refractory to Lenalidomide: Overview of the Clinical Trials in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-142642 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 22-23

Author(s):

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Rohan Medhekar ◽

Istvan Majer ◽

Mehmet Turgut

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Literature Review ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Unmet Need ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Line Of Therapy

Introduction: The majority of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients are currently treated with lenalidomide-based regimens as their first line of therapy. This trend is likely to continue in the coming years. Typically, lenalidomide is administered until disease progression and has significantly contributed to better outcomes in these patients. However, most patients relapse, and prognosis worsens with each relapse. The choice of optimal treatment for patients who relapse while receiving lenalidomide as first line of therapy is unclear. Moreau et al (Blood Cancer J. 9, 38 [2019]) concluded that there is limited data on approved combinations for treating these patients and are restricted by the low number of lenalidomide-refractory patients enrolled in the pivotal trials. Results from the ongoing clinical trials of the combination of carfilzomib and anti-CD38 antibodies were not available at the time of the Moreau et al publication. The aim of this targeted literature review was to include this new data and to summarize currently available evidence on progression-free survival (PFS) for the treatment of RRMM patients who progressed on lenalidomide-based regimens. Methods: A targeted literature review was conducted to identify registrational clinical trials in patients with RRMM reporting PFS outcomes. PubMed, congress proceedings, and product labels were searched between Jan 2014 to July 2020. In addition to PFS, demographic, disease characteristics and treatment history were extracted for the trial populations to contextualize potential variations in study outcomes. The regimens studied in these trials were classified as lenalidomide-based, proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based and pomalidomide-based. Number of prior lines of therapy, prior exposure and refractoriness to lenalidomide and bortezomib were reported. Results: Twelve registrational trials were identified based on the search criteria (Table 1). Most pivotal trials assessing lenalidomide-based regimens (POLLUX, ELOQUENT-II, TOURMALINE-MM1) except the ASPIRE trial excluded patients who were refractory to lenalidomide. Trials evaluating PI-based regimens (e.g., CANDOR) or pomalidomide-based regimens (e.g., OPTIMISMM) included these patients, with more recent studies enrolling a larger proportion. Percentage of lenalidomide-exposed (and lenalidomide refractory) ranged from 40% (32%) in CANDOR to 98% (90%) in ELOQUENT III. These studies also enrolled a larger proportion of patients who were bortezomib-exposed, although most of these patients were at first relapse, with the exception of ELOQUENT III and ICARIA where most patients were at third relapse. Among lenalidomide-refractory patients, the median-PFS (mPFS) observed for the pomalidomide-based regimens ranged from 9.5 to 10.1 months and that observed for PI-based regimens ranged from 4.9 to 25.7 months. PFS in the lenalidomide-refractory subgroup was considerably shorter than in the ITT population. The mPFS for patients receiving carfilzomib/daratumumab/dexamethasone (KDd; CANDOR) and isatuximab/carfilzomib/dexamethasone (IsaKd; IKEMA) was not reached at median follow-up of 16.9 and 20.7 months respectively. While the mPFS for (KDd) for lenalidomide-refractory patients in CANDOR trial was not yet reached at median follow up of 16.9 months; the mPFS of 25.7 months for KDd in the MMY-1001 trial appears to be the longest among the assessed regimens. Conclusion: Patients refractory to lenalidomide have shorter PFS and represent a population with high unmet need. This targeted literature review suggests that the PI-based KDd regimen provides longer PFS compared to other lenalidomide-sparing regimens in lenalidomide-refractory populations. Heterogeneity across trial populations may limit the comparability of these treatments. Disclosures Mateos: Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaMar-Zeltia: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Medhekar:Amgen Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Majer:Amgen (Europe) GmbH: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Download Full-text

High Levels of APOBEC3B Gene Expression Contribute to Poor Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117067 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3897-3897

Author(s):

Valeriy V Lyzogubov ◽

Pingping Qu ◽

Cody Ashby ◽

Adam Rosenthal ◽

Antje Hoering ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gene Expression ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Poor Prognosis ◽

Target Genes ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Nuclear Fraction ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction: Poor prognosis and drug resistance in multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with increased mutational load. APOBEC3B is a major contributor to mutagenesis, especially in myeloma patients with t(14;16) MAF subgroup. It was shown recently that presence of the APOBEC signature at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We hypothesized that high levels of APOBEC3B gene expression at diagnosis may also have a prognostic impact in myeloma. To consider APOBEC3B as a potential target for therapy more studies are necessary to understand how APOBEC3B expression is regulated and how APOBEC3B generates mutations. Methods: Gene expression profiling (GEP, U133 Plus 2.0) of MM patients was performed. APOBEC3B gene expression levels were investigated in plasma cells of healthy donors (HD; n=34), MGUS (n=154), smoldering myeloma (SMM; n=219), MM low risk (LR; n=739), MM high risk (HR; n=129), relapsed MM (RMM; n=74), and primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL; n=19) samples. The samples from relapse were taken on or after the progression/relapse date but within 30 days after progression/relapse from Total Therapy trials 3, 4, 5 & 6. GEP70 score was used to separate samples into LR and HR groups. We also investigated APOBEC3B expression in different MM molecular subgroups and used logrank statistics with covariate frequency distribution to determine an optimal cut off APOBEC3B expression value. Gene expression was compared in cases with low expression of APOBEC3B (log2<7.5) and high expression of APOBEC3B (log2>10), and an optimal cut-point in APOBEC3B expression was identified with respect to PFS. To explore the role of MAF and the non-canonical NF-ĸB pathway we performed functional studies using a cellular model of MAF downregulation. TRIPZ lentiviral shRNA MAF knockdown in the RPMI8226 cell lines was used to explore MAF-dependent genes. NF-ĸB proteins, p52 and RelB, were investigated in the nuclear fraction by immunoblot analysis. Results: Expression of APOBEC3B in HD control samples (log2=10.9) was surprisingly higher than in MGUS (log2=9.51), SMM (log2=9.09), and LR (log2=9.40) and was comparable to HR (log2=10.4) and RMM (log2=10.6) groups. Expression levels of APOBEC3B were gradually increased as disease progressed from SMM to pPCL. The high expression of APOBEC3B in HD places plasma cells at risk of APOBEC induced mutagenesis where the regulation of APOBEC3B function is compromised. The correlation between APOBEC3B expression and GEP70 score in MM was 0.37, and there was a significant difference in APOBEC3B expression between GEP70 high and low risk groups (p=0.0003). An optimal cut-point in APOBEC3B expression of log2=10.2 resulted in a significant difference in PFS (median 5.7 yr vs.7.4 yr; p=0.0086) and OS (median 9.1 yr vs. not reached; p<0.0001), between high and low expression. The highest APOBEC3B expression was detected in cases with a t(14;16). We analyzed t(14;16) cases with the APOBEC mutational signature and compared them to t(14;16) cases without the APOBEC signature and found elevated MAF (2-fold) and APOBEC3B (2.7-fold) gene expression in samples with the APOBEC signature. No APOBEC signature was detected in SMM cases, including those with a t(14;16). High APOBEC3B levels in myeloma patients was associated with overexpression of genes related to response to DNA damage and cell cycle control. Significant (p<0.05) increases of NF-κB target genes was seen in high APOBEC3B cases: TNFAIP3 (4.4-fold), NFKB2 (1.7-fold), NFKBIE (1.9-fold), RELB (1.4-fold), NFKBIA (2.0-fold), PLEK (2.5-fold), MALT1 (2.5-fold), WNT10A (2.4-fold). However, in t(14;16) cases there was no significant increase of NF-κB target genes except BIRC3 (2.5-fold) and MALT1 (2.0-fold). MAF downregulation in RPMI8226 cells did not lead to changes in NF-κB target gene expression but MAF-dependent genes were identified, including ETS1, SPP1, RUNX2, HGF, IGFBP2 and IGFBP3. Analysis of nuclear fraction of NF-ĸB proteins did not show significant changes in expression of p52 and RelB in RPMI8226 cells after MAF downregulation. Conclusions: Increased expression of APOBEC3B is a negative prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. MAF is a major factor regulating expression of APOBEC3B in the t(14;16) subgroup. NF-ĸB pathway activation is most likely involved in upregulation of APOBEC3B in non-t(14;16) subgroups. Disclosures Davies: TRM Oncology: Honoraria; MMRF: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASH: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy. Morgan:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Universal: An Allogeneic First-in-Human Study of the Anti-Bcma ALLO-715 and the Anti-CD52 ALLO-647 in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140641 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 24-25 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sham Mailankody ◽

Jeffrey V. Matous ◽

Michaela Liedtke ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Shahbaz Malik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Oncology Research ◽

Car T ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels

Background Allogeneic (off the shelf) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy addresses the logistical challenges, availability and variable product quality of autologous CAR T therapy. ALLO-715 is a genetically modified anti-BCMA AlloCAR Ttm cell product in which the TCR alpha constant gene is disrupted to reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and the CD52 gene is disrupted with Talen® technology to permit the use of ALLO-647, an anti-CD52 mAb, for selective and prolonged host lymphodepletion (LD). Methods This is an open-label, Phase 1 trial (NCT04093596) in adults with R/R multiple myeloma who have received ≥3 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulator, and anti-CD38 mAb. Patients (pts) must be refractory to their last treatment line. Patients receive LD followed by ALLO-715 at 1 of 4 dose levels (DL) in a 3+3 dose escalation design: 40, 160, 320, and 480 x 106 CAR+ T cells. Several LD regimens are being evaluated. These include: FCA (fludarabine (F) 90 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide (C) 900 mg/m2, and ALLO-647 (A) 39 mg divided over 3 days), FCA+ (same F and C but ALLO-647 (A+) dose of 90 mg divided over 3 days); as well as CA (same C and A divided over 3 days, but no F given). Results As of 08 July 2020, 19 pts had enrolled and 15 had received ALLO-715 at 3 DLs: 3 pts at DL1 (3 FCA and 0 CA); 7 pts at DL2 (4 FCA and 3 CA); 5 pts at DL3 (3 FCA and 2 CA). As of the data cutoff, no pts had received FCA+ or ALLO-715 DL4. Patients were heavily pre-treated and in advanced stage of disease with a median of 5 (range 3-11) prior lines of therapy and 31.6% ISS Stage III at screening. All but 1 had a prior autologous stem cell transplant. 52.6% (10/19) of patients had high risk cytogenetics, and 26.3% (5/19) had extramedullary disease. The most common Grade ≥3 adverse events were anemia (41.2%), neutropenia (41.2%), lymphopenia (29.4%), and thrombocytopenia (29.4%). Four episodes of Grade ≥3 infections occurred in 4 pts. Three of these were Grade 3 and included parvovirus B19, staphylococcal bacteremia, and pneumonia, which resolved with treatment. The fourth was a Grade 5 episode that occurred on day 8 post-ALLO-715 infusion in a rapidly progressing, refractory myeloma pt who, on day 1, developed a non-neutropenic fever and multifocal pneumonia with negative blood and sputum cultures. The patient progressed to respiratory failure and only comfort care was pursued. This death was considered related to conditioning (CA). No DLTs to ALLO-715 had been reported as of the data cutoff. In addition, no neurotoxicity (ICANS) or GvHD had been reported as of the data cutoff. Cytokine release syndrome was reported in 4 pts (24%). Three episodes were Grade 1 and 1 was Grade 2 (Lee Grading); all resolved without tocilizumab or corticosteroids. Fifteen pts were efficacy evaluable (defined as receiving ALLO-715, and undergoing at least one response assessment or discontinuing prior to the first response assessment), with a median follow-up of 2 months (range 0, 10 months). A higher dose of ALLO-715 (DL3) was associated with greater anti-cancer activity with 3/5 pts responding per IMWG (60%, 95% CI 14.7, 94.7). In pts who received DL3 FCA, 2/3 responded (1 sCR and 1 VGPR, Table 1). All DL3 pts who responded experienced at least a VGPR and achieved MRD negative status by local MRD testing. All responses were initially observed at day 14. Four (80%) out of the 5 responders were still in response at the time of the data cutoff. ALLO-715 cell expansion by qPCR was observed at all dose levels. Conclusions These early data suggest that ALLO-715 and ALLO-647 have a manageable safety profile. ALLO-715 shows evidence of clinical activity in the allogeneic setting in pts with R/R multiple myeloma and suggests that higher cell doses are associated with greater anti-cancer activity. Enrollment is ongoing in cohorts with higher ALLO-715 (480M CAR+ T-cells) and ALLO-647 (90mg). Updated safety, efficacy, PK/PD data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04093596. Disclosures Mailankody: Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; PleXus Communications: Honoraria; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Research Funding. Matous:Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Liedtke:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria. Sidana:Janssen: Consultancy. Nath:Actinium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oluwole:Bayer: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Karski:Crisper Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Allogene Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Nektar Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Lovelace:Allogene Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zhou:Allogene Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Nandakumar:Allogene Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Balakumaran:Allogene Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Merck: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Hari:BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Denosumab Versus Intravenous (IV) Bisphosphonate Use for Hypercalcemia in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140702 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 14-16

Author(s):

Matthew M Lei ◽

Erica Tavares ◽

Uvette Lou ◽

Evan Buzgo ◽

Noopur S. Raje ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Dysfunction ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Additional Dose ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Median Dose ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

The Past

Background Hypercalcemia (HC) is a frequent complication of multiple myeloma (MM) occurring in 20-30% of patients. This is often associated with renal dysfunction and both features are important myeloma defining events resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANKL, has been evaluated in the prevention of skeletal related events in patients with newly diagnosed MM, as well as the treatment of bisphosphonate-refractory HC of malignancy (HCM). Cases of denosumab for HCM in MM patients with renal dysfunction have been described. Both denosumab and IV bisphosphonates (IVB) represent treatment options for HC in MM. We describe a comparison of patients with MM with HC who received denosumab vs IVBs. Methods We retrospectively identified patients age ≥18 with a diagnosis of MM with HC (corrected serum calcium level [CSC] >10.5 mg/dL). Patients were included if they received either denosumab or IVB (zoledronic acid [ZA] or pamidronate), between April 2016 and June 2020. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as normalization of CSC to less than 10.5 mg/dL. Secondary endpoints included HC relapse (CSC >10.5 mg/dL) and safety. Hypocalcemia was graded per CTCAE v5. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined using KGIDO criteria. Patients were followed-up for 56 days. Bivariate analyses were performed. Results A total of 40 patients were included with 18 in the denosumab group and 22 in the IVB group, of whom 15 (68%) received ZA and 7 (32%) received pamidronate. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1. Patients with newly diagnosed MM composed 33% and 55% of the denosumab and IVB groups, respectively. All patients in the denosumab group received 120 mg except one who received 60 mg, while in the IVB group, dose reductions occurred in 5/15 patients who received ZA (median dose, 4 mg; range, 3.3-4) and 4/7 patients who received pamidronate (median dose, 60 mg; range, 30-90). Most patients received HC treatment as an inpatient (58% inpatient vs. 42% outpatient). A minority of patients had received IVBs in the past 90 days. The mean CSC was 12.5 mg/dL (standard deviation [SD], 1.40) and 13.3 mg/dL (SD, 2.39) in the denosumab and IVB groups, respectively. Baseline serum creatinine (SCr) was higher and creatinine clearance (CrCl) was lower in the denosumab group (median SCr, 2.06 vs. 1.24 mg/dL, p=0.048; median CrCl, 33 vs. 48 mL/min, p=0.048). The CR rate by day 3-4 was 92% and 94% in the denosumab and IVB groups, respectively (p=NS). HC relapse occurred in 2 (12%) and 6 (29%) patients in the denosumab and IVB groups, respectively (p=0.257). Incidence of grade 1 hypocalcemia was similar between groups; however, incidence of grade ≥2 hypocalcemia was higher in the denosumab group. Incidence of new AKI was 28% (5/18) in the denosumab group 23% (5/22) in the IVB group (p=0.71). No patients in the denosumab group received an additional dose of denosumab within 14 days of initial dose. Three patients in the IVB group received an additional dose of an IVB within 14 days of initial dose. One patient, who was in the denosumab group, had refractory hypercalcemia and had not achieved CR at day 56. Conclusions We describe our experience with denosumab and IVB for the management of HC in patients with MM. The CR rate at 3-4 days was similar with either agent in our MM only population that was not bisphosphonate refractory. A higher incidence of grade 2 hypocalcemia was noted in the denosumab group. Conclusions on renal safety are limited by the small sample size and that patients in the denosumab group had a higher SCr on presentation. Denosumab and IVB represent acceptable agents for the management of HC in MM patients with further investigation necessary in those with renal dysfunction. Disclosures Lei: Fresenius Kabi USA: Consultancy; Trapelo Health: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bristol Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Clovis Oncology: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Blueprint Medicines: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Lou:Fresenius Kabi USA: Consultancy. Raje:Bluebird, Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Immuneel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caribou: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Astrazeneca: Consultancy. Yee:Karyopharm: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Denosumab is indicated for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy refractory to bisphosphonate therapy. We describe the use of denosumab for hypercalcemia of malignancy in a multiple myeloma only patient population that is not bisphosphonate refractory. The use of denosumab for these patients was part of normal clinical practice in adherence to institutional policies and guidelines.

Download Full-text

FLT3 and LSD1 Inhibitor Combinations Synergistically Repress Growth of FLT3-Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia Via Blockage of MYC Function

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-143029 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 31-32

Author(s):

Daniel J. Coleman ◽

Brittany M. Smith ◽

Cody Coblentz ◽

Rowan L. Callahan ◽

Jake VanCampen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Transcription Factor ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Transcriptional Activation ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Target Genes ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Private Company ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Flt3 Inhibitor

Internal Tandem Duplication mutations of Fms Related Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3), known as FLT3-ITD mutations, are associated with poor prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). The clinical efficacy of inhibiting FLT3 in AML is limited by the rapid development of drug resistance and relapse, underscoring a need for more potent and durable treatment strategies. The early persistence of leukemic blasts during FLT3 inhibition is a key driver of resistance. We find that in combination, inhibitors of Lysine Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) potentiate the activity of FLT3 inhibitors, driving synergistic cell death. This novel therapeutic approach has the potential to drive deeper therapeutic responses in FLT3-Mutant AML, delaying or preventing the development of resistance. LSD1 is a dynamic DNA-associated protein that functions as a chromatin modifier and transcription factor. LSD1 removes methylation on both lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4), associated with transcriptional activation, and lysine 9 (H3K9), associated with transcriptional repression. Additionally, LSD1 has been reported to function as a transcription factor independent of its catalytic demethylase function. LSD1 inhibition reduces cell proliferation in several cancer types. In AML specifically, inhibition of LSD1 has been reported to activate enhancers associated with genes that promote differentiation. We hypothesized that combining LSD1 inhibition with FLT3 inhibition in FLT3-ITD AML would result in synergistic effects on cell viability through reactivating differentiation pathways and more strongly blocking proliferation. In this study, we aimed to examine the efficacy, transcriptional effects, and changes in chromatin dynamics when combining LSD1 inhibition with FLT3 inhibition in a FLT3-ITD mutant cell line and patient samples. We used matrix combination screening to determine that combining the FLT3 inhibitor Quizartinib with LSD1 inhibitors (GSK-2879552 or ORY-1001) synergistically represses cell viability in the FLT3-ITD mutant MOLM-13 cell line and in multiple primary AML samples. RNA-seq followed by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis revealed that combining LSD1 and FLT3 inhibition synergistically represses target genes of the oncogenic transcription factor MYC. This finding was corroborated through high-throughput genome-wide profiling of histone marks, using the recently developed technique Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag). Specifically, we discovered several promoter regions in which acetylation of lysine 27 of Histone H3 (H3K27Ac), associated with transcriptional activation, was repressed by combining LSD1 and FLT3 inhibition. The genes associated with these regions were strongly enriched for known MYC target genes. Through additional genomic profiling methods including ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq, we have established potential roles for several DNA-binding transcription factors including CEBPA, RUNX1, STAT5, and LSD1 itself, that may mediate repression of MYC function resulting from combining LSD1 and FLT3 inhibition. Together, our work establishes LSD1 and FLT3 inhibitor combinations as a promising treatment strategy in FLT3-ITD AML. Importantly, this study identifies combined FLT3 and LSD1 inhibition as an effective strategy to indirectly target MYC function, as MYC is often referred to as an "undruggable" target. Furthermore, it has the potential to drive deeper molecular responses in FLT3-mutant AML, decreasing the likelihood of treatment resistance. Disclosures Druker: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ARIAD: Research Funding; Cepheid: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Third Coast Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; VB Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millipore (formerly Upstate Biotechnology): Patents & Royalties; Pfizer: Research Funding; The RUNX1 Research Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Vivid Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Patient True Talks: Consultancy; Oregon Health & Science University: Patents & Royalties; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; MolecularMD (acquired by ICON): Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Henry Stewart Talks: Patents & Royalties; Iterion Therapeutics (formerly Beta Cat Pharmaceuticals): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptose Therapeutics Inc. (formerly Lorus): Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck & Co: Patents & Royalties; GRAIL: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aileron Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; McGraw Hill: Patents & Royalties; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; ALLCRON: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Patents & Royalties; EnLiven: Consultancy, Research Funding. Maxson:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Joint oversight committee for a collaboration between OHSU and Ionis Pharmaceuticals.

Download Full-text

CD73 Inhibition Overcomes Immunosuppression and Triggers Autologous T-Cell Mediated Multiple Myeloma Cell Lysis in the Bone Marrow Milieu

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148174 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2675-2675

Author(s):

Arghya Ray ◽

Melissa R Junttila ◽

Ting DU ◽

Dena Sutimantanapi ◽

Xi Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Surface ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cell Types ◽

Cytolytic Activity ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Adenosine is an anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive metabolite, that signals to diminish activation and proliferation of cytotoxic T-cells, impair activity of natural killer cells and CD4 + effector T-cells, and promote the expansion of immunosuppressive cell types. CD73, a cell surface ecto-5'-nucleotidase, is required to convert AMP to adenosine and is a major catalyst of adenosine generation in the tumor microenvironment. Overexpression of CD73 is observed in many tumors and correlates with unfavorable clinical outcome. Bone marrow (BM) aspirates from multiple myeloma (MM) patients have shown increased adenosine levels correspond with disease progression [Horenstein et al. Mol Med. 2016,22:694-704] In addition to the adenosine rich feature of MM, multiple cell types within the MM BM niche express the enzymes required for adenosine production from both NAD and ATP precursors, including CD38, CD203a, CD39 and CD73. Previously, we demonstrated that dysfunctional plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) predominantly found in the BM of MM patients contribute to MM cell growth, survival, and suppression of antitumor immunity [Chauhan et al, Cancer Cell 2009, 16:309-323; Ray et al, Leukemia 2015, 29:1441-1444]. We recently discovered that the interaction between pDCs and MM cells increased CD73 transcript and protein levels in both cell types, implicating a role for adenosine signaling via CD73 signaling axis in MM. Together, these MM disease features indicate that reducing the level of adenosine via inhibition of CD73 may represent a unique vulnerability and treatment strategy for MM. Methods: To understand the functional consequence of CD73 inhibition in MM, autologous ex vivo cell assays using freshly isolated BM aspirates from MM patients were used to detect changes in immune cell function and MM cell viability upon treatment with OP-5558, a potent and selective CD73 small molecule inhibitor which is an analog of the clinical candidate, ORIC-533. The majority of BM samples utilized were from patients with relapsed or refractory MM after at least three lines of therapy including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, as well as a patient with relapsed MM post BCMA-CAR-T therapy. Results: In BM aspirates from MM patients with relapsed refractory MM, CD73 inhibition by OP-5558 triggered activation of MM pDCs, evidenced by increased expression of CD40/CD83/CD86 (1.2-1.5-fold, OP-5558-treated versus untreated; p < 0.05; n=3). This inhibition of CD73 reversed immunosuppression in MM BM. Specifically, CD73 inhibitor OP-5558 stimulated T-cell activation, associated with increased CD69 cell surface expression on CD3 + T-cells (CD69 MFI:20% increase, treated versus control; p = 0.0031; n = 3). Moreover, CD8 + T-cells from these co-cultures enhanced cytolytic activity against patient MM cells, significantly decreasing autologous MM cell viability (mean 42% decrease in viability; treated versus control; p=0.014; n=5). Of note, OP-5558 treatment did not directly affect viability of MM cells when treated in isolation, indicating that the observed decreased viability occurs via enhanced cytotoxic T-cell activity. Importantly, we show that OP-5558 triggered significant MM cell lysis even within autologous MM bone marrow mononuclear cell (BMNC) cultures, confirming that CD73 inhibition restores MM-specific cytolytic activity of autologous patient T-cells in the MM BM microenvironment. (mean 37% decrease in viability; treated versus control; p=0.009; n=3). Conclusions: This study therefore demonstrates that: 1. CD73-mediated adenosine activity suppresses the cytolytic activity of T-cells against tumor cells in the MM BM milieu; and 2. CD73 inhibition can overcome immune suppression and restore lysis of MM cells by autologous T-cells. A clinical trial of potent, selective, orally bioavailable CD73 inhibitor ORIC-533 will examine the utility of CD73 inhibition to improve outcome in patients with relapsed refractory MM. Disclosures Junttila: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Sutimantanapi: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Chen: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Warne: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Chang: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Blank: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Wu: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Moore: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Ndubaku: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Zavorotinskaya: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Nadeem: GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Friedman: ORIC Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Chauhan: C4 Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Stemline Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy. Anderson: Millenium-Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Scientific Founder of Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mana Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Response Adaptive Salvage Treatment with Carfilzomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone for Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients Failing Front-Line Bortezomib-Based Induction Therapy - Final Analysis from the Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM17 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152034 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1663-1663

Author(s):

Rose Turner ◽

Hang Quach ◽

Noemi Horvath ◽

Ian H Kerridge ◽

Flora Yuen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Depth Of Response

Abstract BACKGROUND Survival rates in multiple myeloma (MM) have significantly improved in recent decades with the advent of high-dose chemotherapy conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and the availability of novel agents for induction therapy (Kumar SK et al. Blood 2008). Failure to respond to front-line bortezomib-based induction therapy remains a significant clinical challenge in transplant eligible (TE) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), and is associated with poor outcomes with shortened progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (Lee SE et al. Ann Hematol. 2014). In combination with immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), carfilzomib, a second generation proteosome inhibitor, has been shown to be highly effective in the context of MM induction with high rates of negativity for minimal residual disease (MRD) and few dose limiting toxicities (Langren O et al. Leukemia 2019). The ALLG MM17 trial is a multicentre single arm study of carfilzomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (KTd) in TE NDMM patients refractory or with suboptimal response to bortezomib-based induction therapy, designed to evaluate the efficacy of early response adaption with a switch to an intensive salvage strategy. METHOD Eligible patients included those with TE NDMM, aged 18 years and older, demonstrating sub-optimal response to bortezomib-based induction therapy (failure to achieve a minimal response after 2 cycles, partial response [PR] after 4 cycles, or disease progression within 60 days of completing induction). Salvage therapy consisted of 100mg daily oral thalidomide, with 20 mg of oral dexamethasone and 20mg/56mg of IV carfilzomib on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16, with of each 28-day cycle. Following 4 cycles, patients in stringent complete response (sCR) proceeded to melphalan conditioned ASCT whereas those in less than sCR received a further 2 cycles of KTd prior to ASCT. Consolidation therapy consisted of a further 2 cycles of KTd, followed by maintenance 100mg daily thalidomide and 40mg weekly dexamethasone (Td) continuing until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or 12 months of therapy. Primary objectives were to determine the overall response rate (ORR) and safety profile of treatment with KTd salvage therapy, with secondary objectives to determine the maximal depth of response, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) achieved with sequential treatment with KTd salvage, ASCT, post-ASCT consolidation, and maintenance Td therapy. Efficacy assessments were performed via serum protein electrophoresis, serum free light chain and bone marrow evaluation. Next generation flow (NGF) cytometry MRD evaluation of bone marrow aspirate was undertaken pre-ASCT, at day 100 post-ASCT, after 2 cycles of consolidation KTd, and following completion of Td using standardized 8-colour EuroFlow platform. RESULTS 50 patients were recruited across 6 Australian sites between September 2016 and April 2018. Overall response rate to KTd salvage was 78% (Credible Interval 95%: 64.4-87.1%), with dual proof of concept criteria met (observed ORR ≥ 50% and posterior probability that the true ORR exceeds 30% is ≥ 0.90). Response rates included 12% sCR, 6% CR, 38% VGPR, and 22% PR. Sixteen patients discontinued treatment (32%) including 10 cases (20%) of progressive disease, and 2 patient deaths without progression. NGF MRD negativity was found to be 32%, 36% and 55% at the pre-ASCT, post-ASCT and post-consolidation time-points. At the cut-off date, estimated median follow-up for disease status was 38.6 months and median PFS and OS had not been reached. At 36 months PFS and OS were 63.9% (95%CI: 49.0 - 75.5%) and 79.9% (95%CI: 65.8 - 88.6%) respectively (Figure 1). KTd was found to be well tolerated with 44% of patients experiencing a grade 3 of higher adverse event (AE). Most common AEs included upper respiratory infection (48%), peripheral neuropathy (36%), musculoskeletal pain (32%), dyspnoea (28%), fatigue or lethargy (28%), and constipation (28%). Significant cardiac toxicity was not observed at this higher dose level of carfilzomib. CONCLUSION Results demonstrate that response-adaptive utilisation of KTd salvage, ASCT, and consolidation therapy induces high response rates, improving depth of response with high levels of sequential MRD negativity, and durable responses with an acceptable toxicity profile in TE NDMM patients failing bortezomib-based induction therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Quach: Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen/Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kalff: Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; CSL: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria. Bergin: Amgen: Other: Travel to workshop; Celgene: Consultancy. Reynolds: Novartis AG: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Alcon: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Research Funding. Spencer: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; STA: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Presence of Extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) Impacts Both Progression Free and Overall Survival and Is an Independent Poor Prognostic Marker in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151647 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 461-461

Author(s):

Parth Shah ◽

Anil Aktas-Samur ◽

Mariateresa Fulciniti ◽

Raphael Szalat ◽

Masood A. Shammas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Copy Number ◽

Research Funding ◽

P Value ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Extrachromosomal Dna ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background Focal amplifications and rearrangements drive tumor growth and evolution in cancer. Focally amplified regions often involve the juxtaposition of rearranged segments of DNA from distinct chromosomal loci into a single amplified region and nearly half of these regions can be explained by circular, extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) formation. Cancer-associated ecDNA shows a unique circular placing ecDNA at the interface of cancer genomics and epigenetics. As formation of ecDNA represents a manifestation of genomic instability, we have investigated presence and prognostic impact of ecDNA in multiple myeloma (MM). Methods Whole genome (WGS) and transcriptome (RNAseq) sequencing data from CD138 purified MM cells from 191 uniformly-treated newly diagnosed MM patients were used for this analysis. Copy number variants (CNV), single nucleotide variants (SNV) and structural variants (SV) were identified on all WGS samples using Facets, Mutect2 and Manta. Seed data from these CNV results was passed to the AmpliconArchitect tool to determine presence of focally amplified and rearranged segments of DNA. Seed CNV thresholds were set for a minimum CNV size of 100kb and a copy number of equal or greater to 5. Extrachromosomal calls were then annotated using the Amplicon Classifier to determine the presence of ecDNA. Multivariate survival analysis was performed after segregating samples into the conventional myeloma risk classifications including translocations, copy number alterations, ISS, age and mutations associated with risk. Differential expression analysis was performed on transcriptomic data using DEseq2. Results We identified 6.8% of the newly diagnosed patients with ecDNA, 12.5% with complex non-cyclic DNA amplifications and 10.1% with linear amplifications. ecDNA and complex events were targeting MM dependent genes, including MYC/PVT1, IRF4 as well as known driver genes such as CDYL and TRAF2. We further evaluated association between ecDNA, complex rearrangements, linear amplification and patients with none of these amplification types and found that patients with ecDNA had significantly poor PFS (median PFS 22 months vs. 41 months) and OS (median OS 41 months vs. 105 months). Patients having ecDNA in their MM cells did not show any significant enrichment for known translocations, double hit or TP53 mutations. In a multivariate model including ecDNA and all other known MM risk features, ecDNA was found to be an independent predictor of progression free survival.(HR 2.6, CI: 1.26 -5.6, p=0.0082) and overall survival (HR 7.94 CI:3.5-17.9 p < 0.0001). Patients with ecDNA have higher mutational load probability(8798 vs 6982, effect size = 0.64 , probability is 91.1). However, this was not reflected in heterogeneity by using MATH score. We found that patients with ecDNA are likely to have BRAF mutations (OR= 25.07 [2.57 - 330 95% CI], p value = 0.002), however overall RAS/RAF pathway mutations were similar to other patients. Patients with ecDNA showed fragile DNA with more breaks (median segments 197 vs. 125.5, p value = 0.001). Although ecDNA is defined as copy number gain with fragments having 5 or more copies, overall genomic gain between ecDNA and other patients were similar. However, overall genomic loss in patients with ecDNA were higher than others (7% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.06). By differential gene expression analysis we noted 98 differentially expressed genes in MM cells with ecDNA. The downregulated geneset involved pathways responsible for cell death as well as the RAS pathway. Interestingly, CD38 was upregulated in the ecDNA dataset suggesting greater potential for CD38 targeting therapies in these patients. Conclusions ecDNA, as an unique marker of perturbed genomic integrity, is observed in a subset of patients and is an independent prognostic marker in newly diagnosed MM patients. As patients with ecDNA are not fully captured by other risk features its incorporation in an expanded definition of a high risk group of multiple myeloma should be investigated. Future studies will endeavor to explore the biological mechanism through which ecDNA are formed and influences outcomes in myeloma. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Richardson: Sanofi: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Secura Bio: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Perrot: Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Moreau: Abbvie: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene BMS: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Honoraria. Thakurta: Oxford University: Other: Visiting Professor; BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Anderson: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium-Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Scientific Founder of Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Mana Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Munshi: Legend: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: scientific founder, Patents & Royalties; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Genomic and Transcriptomic Characterization of IgM Multiple Myeloma Identifies a Pre-Germinal Center Plasma Cell Disorder with Immature B-Cell Transcription-Factor Signature

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138951 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 7-8

Author(s):

Abdul Hamid Bazarbachi ◽

Herve Avet-Loiseau ◽

Zachary R Hunter ◽

Raphael Szalat ◽

Anil Aktas-Samur ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Switch Region ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Private Company ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Transcript Levels ◽

Unique Signature

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a proliferation of terminally differentiated plasma cells (PC) producing monoclonal immunoglobulins (Ig), most commonly IgG and IgA (50% and 25% respectively), and less frequently, light-chain only disease, non-secretory, and IgD. IgM-MM is a rare entity (<0.5%), and its differentiation from common IgM producing PC disorders like Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) is essential considering their distinct treatments and prognoses. Recent advancements in molecular techniques have shed light on the genomic characteristics and unique alterations in MM and WM, however, comprehensive profiling is still lacking for IgM-MM. We performed deep whole-genome sequencing on five IgM samples as well as 211 MM and 34 WM samples, and transcriptome sequencing on the IgM samples as well as 30 MM, 35 WM, and 3 PC. All IgM-MM samples harbored t(11;14) which combines super enhancers in Ig genes with CCND1. All translocations involved VHDHJH regions (Figure 1A) at the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) locus, compared to IgG/IgA MM samples that had predominantly switch-region translocations (Figure 1B/C). Switch-region translocations are generated through class-switch recombination (CSR) in mature B-cells in germinal centers (GC), and VHDHJH translocations occur during recombination at the early pro-B-cell stage in the bone marrow (BM). While IgG/IgA-MM displayed evidence of CSR with deletions between IGHM switch-region and IGHG/IGHA switch regions, IgM-MM had no such events. IgM-MM therefore appears to undergo malignant transformation prior to late-stage B-cell maturation, after which CSR is unlikely, which is supported by a lack of progression of IgM-monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to non-IgM-MM. IgM-MM also displayed similar copy number variation (CNV) patterns and driver mutations compared to non-IgM-MM suggesting similar progression events. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering using differentially expressed genes between non-IgM-MM and WM separated the IgM-MM samples within non-IgM-MM. This indicates a closer molecular homology to MM compared to WM with a unique signature for this group not accounted for by the t(11;14) translocation. Running the same analysis using only B-cell specific transcription factors (TFs) yielded similar results, with separation of WM and MM and preferential clustering of IgM-MM within the latter while also exhibiting a unique signature (Figure 1D). Some noteworthy examples were the upregulation of PBX3, PAX5, BCL11A, and ATF2, and the downregulation of PRDM1 and BCL3 compared to non-IgM-MM. The loss of PAX5 and upregulation of PRDM1 in B-cells has been implicated in promoting commitment to PC differentiation, while BCL11A was found essential for early B-cell progenitor development through the GC but extinguished in terminally differentiated PC. It appears that IgM-MM has therefore a more immature phenotype compared with non-IgM-MM, which further supports the previously discussed findings of its pre-GC origin and lack of terminal development. Three clinically relevant targets were noted to be upregulated in IgM-MM, Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), CD20 and BCL-2. BTK was significantly higher in IgM-MM compared to non-IgM-MM (log2fold=1.3; FDR<10-3) with no difference between IgM-MM and WM (log2fold =-0.4; FDR>0.2). This could elucidate a more prominent role for BTK-inhibition in the IgM-MM subgroup. Furthermore, as documented in t(11;14)-MM, IgM-MM had elevated transcript levels of CD20 with possible targeting using anti-CD20 antibodies. Finally, elevated levels of BCL-2 in both IgM and non-IgM-t(11;14)-MM were observed, an established target for both single-agent and combination therapy. Interestingly, although not significant, IgM-MM had lower transcript levels of BCL-XL and MCL-1 compared to non-IgM-t(11;14)-MM, believed to be a predictor of higher sensitivity to venetoclax, and therefore an important guide for treatment choice. Clinical data however is lacking, and further investigations are needed to fully understand the potential role of these drugs in treating IgM-MM. In summary we describe a unique genomic and transcriptomic profile of IgM-MM, compared to both non-IgM-MM and WM, that describes its cellular origin and provides the rationale for potential therapeutic intervention. Disclosures Fulciniti: NIH: Research Funding. Anderson:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium-Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.: Other: Scientific Founder of Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics.. Parmigiani:Phaeno Biotehnologies: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; CRA Health: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Foundation Medicine Institute: Consultancy; Delphi Diagnostics: Consultancy; BayesMendel Laboratory: Other: Co-lead. Treon:Bristol-Meyer-Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mohty:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Munshi:Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; C4: Current equity holder in private company; Janssen: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Characteristics of a Comprehensive, Continuously Updated Longitudinal Database for Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148399 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4969-4969

Author(s):

C. Anthony Blau ◽

Grace Nam ◽

Leena Chhun ◽

Cheng Zheng ◽

Jayne Piboonvaranggoon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Disease Control ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Real World ◽

Research Funding ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Multi Agent

Abstract Introduction: Despite the availability of many effective agents, multiple myeloma is characterized by repeated cycles of treatment response and relapse, and remains incurable in almost all patients. Efforts to optimize treatment are complicated by variation in disease biology and by the combinatorial complexity inherent in assembling, sequencing and administering multi-agent regimens. Determining which strategies provide maximal therapeutic benefit requires deploying a variety of multi-agent regimens in a range of settings and assessing long-term outcomes; information that cannot be readily discerned from clinical trials. Here we present results from a real-world database that comprehensively tracks all treatments and responses in patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: Since March 2017, All4Cure has hosted an online platform for patients with multiple myeloma, clinicians and researchers that has been initially focused in the Pacific Northwest. Medical records from consenting patients are collected and information regarding all treatments and responses graphically displayed on their de-identified dashboards. A discussion panel allows for asynchronous communication between members of All4Cure's community of patients, clinicians and researchers (currently numbering over 1600 participants). There is no charge to patients who participate in All4Cure, and clinicians and researchers are neither charged nor paid for their participation. A summarized real-world database describes the lines of therapy that each patient has received, treatment start and stop dates, and responses in accordance with International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Results: The overall profile of patients with multiple myeloma enrolled in All4Cure (N=555) was benchmarked against myeloma patients from the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) (diagnosis year 2017; N=25,895). Patients in all 50 States and D.C. were included in the comparison, and those with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) were not considered. Myeloma patients enrolled in All4Cure are younger at diagnosis or start of treatment (median 61 versus between 65 and 69), more likely to be white (90.3% versus 73.5%), and more likely to reside in Washington State (41.2% versus 2%) compared to the NPCR cohort, reflecting participation influenced by geographic location as described above. After enrollment, All4Cure patients are followed longitudinally throughout the entirety of their disease course, with fewer than 2% having been lost to follow up. To gain insights uniquely available from the All4Cure database and to inform the future direction for our research, we focus our exploratory data analysis on the All4Cure cohort of patients who started treatment in June 2015 or later (N=299). Despite the relatively recent start of the All4Cure database, this timeframe allows up to 6 years of observation following the start of treatment, since the survival rates for the first 1-2 years of treatment are generally very high. Consistent with prior knowledge, increasing age and disease stage are associated with increased morality, as are high-risk cytogenetics such as 17p-, t(4:14) and t(14;16). We further explored the potential impact of early lines of therapy on long-term disease control. While the current literature is mixed on the merits of aggressive treatments in early lines of therapy in terms of overall survival, insights from our data suggest that more aggressive front-line therapies (such as SCT) are associated with improved disease control over time, although this is evolving with the impact of novel therapies and in particular the use of triplet and now quadruplet induction regimens and adapting treatment to achieve measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity. Conclusions: Even with the current limitations regarding the size and representativeness of All4Cure's database, these preliminary results support the validity of this approach for gaining insight into the treatments and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma in real-world settings. Disclosures Blau: Oncopeptides: Other: Oncopeptides is an All4Cure customer. Blau: All4Cure: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Richter: Tisch Cancer Institute: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: Current Employment; Janssen, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive biotechnologies: Speakers Bureau; BMS, Karyopharm, Antengene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bensinger: BMS, Janssen, Poseida, Regeneron, Trillium: Research Funding; Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Richardson: Secura Bio: Consultancy; Protocol Intelligence: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Anderson: Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium-Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Scientific Founder of Oncopep and C4 Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mana Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text