Occurence of Malignancies in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiencies: An Analysis of the French Primary Immunodeficency Registry

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1057-1057
Author(s):  
Felipe Suarez ◽  
Hugo Chapdelaine ◽  
Laetitia Compain ◽  
Nizar Mahlaoui ◽  
Chantal Andriamanga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Primary Immunodeficiencies ◽  
Age At Diagnosis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Lymphoid Malignancies ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Abstract 1057 Background: Primary immunodeficiencies (PID) are rare congenital disorders involving defects of the immune system. Aside from infectious complications, patients are at increased risk of malignant complications, which represent a leading cause of mortality in this context. The pathophysiology underlying malignant complications, especially lymphoid malignancies, in PID is not fully understood. The molecular mechansims of PID, that often involve lymphoid developent pathways, may also play a role in oncogenesis. A better understanding of the epidemiology of malignancies in PID may provide important insights in oncogenesis, particularly in lympomagenesis. Material and methods: French National Reference Center for Primary Immune Deficiencies (CEREDIH) has registered 4632 patients with PID as of July 2012. T-cell immunoficiencies and B-cell immodificencies reprensent 35.8% and 46.1% respectively. Patients with Ataxia-Telangiectasia and Severe Congenital Neutropenia were excluded frome the present analysis as they represent a more homogeneous group in terms of molecular pathophysiology and have been described elsewhere. T-cell immunodeficiencies comprise Severe combined immudoficiencies, Combined immunodeficiencies, other well defined T-cell immunoficiencies (including Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome), and diseases of immune regulation (including X-linked lymphoproliferative disease and Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome). B-cell immunodeficiencies include Agammaglobulinemia, Common Variable Immunodeficiency, Unspecified primary hypogammaglobulinemia, Selective IgA deficiency, Hyper-IgM symdrome and IgG subclass deficiency. Diagnostic class of PID, Age at diagnosis of PID, age at diagnosis of neoplastic complication, type of neoplasia, and survival were retrospectively colloected from the medical files. Non-melanomatous skin cancers and lymphoproliferative disorders occuring after allogeneic stem cell tranplantation were excluded from the analysis. Results: 4632 patients with PID were analyzed. Two hundred and sixty seven patients developed 276 cancers (incidence 5.8%). One hundred and fifty seven patients developed lymphoid malignancies and 78 patients developed solid tumors (56.4% vs. 28.3% respectively). Compared to patients with B-cell PID, patients with T-cell PID had lower age at diagnosis of PID (5.5 [0–12.4] vs. 1.3–78]). Lymphoid malignancies, mainly high grade lymphomas were more prevalent in T-cell PID and PID diagnosed at a younger age (median age at diagnosis of PID for patients with lymphoid malignancies vs. solid tumors, 5.2 yr [0–85] and 37.5 [0–80] respectively, p<0,001). More than 75% of solid tumors occured in patients with B-cell PID with a median age of 45 yr. at diagnosis of cancer (p<0,001 compared to lymphoid malignancies for the entire cohort). Occurence of lymphoid malignancies had a major impact on mortality in patients with PID, with an overall survival (OS) of 24.7 yr [0.2–86] vs. 58.3 yr [0.2–90.8] for patients with solid tumors (p<0,001). The difference in OS between PID patients developing solid tumors was not statistically different than the whole cohort of PID patients. Both high and low-grade lymphomas were observed in patients with PID developing lymphoid malginancies. The majority of low grade-malignancies were oberserved in patients with B-cell PID. Discussion: PID bear a high risk of malignancies (5.8%). Solid tumors are observed mainly in B-cell PID and are diagnosed at an older age. Lymphoid malignancies are observed mainly in T-cell PID and B-cell PID diagnosed at a younger age, underlying a possible pathophysiological link between T-cell PID and a subset of B-cell PID. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals P54 Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis in patients on rituximab

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kishore Warrier1 ◽  
Catherine Salvesani ◽  
Samundeeswari Deepak
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Pneumocystis Jirovecii ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that depletes the B cell population by targeting cells bearing the CD20 surface marker and is used widely in the management of paediatric rheumatological conditions like juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a potentially fatal opportunistic infection associated with congenital and acquired defects in T cell–mediated immunity. Our guideline did not recommend prophylaxis against PCP for patients on rituximab, unlike patients on cyclophosphamide, who are on cotrimoxazole until three months after cessation of the treatment. Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent which affects both B and T lymphocytes. Following the death of 16 year-old girl with JSLE due to PCP, the team reviewed the possible contributing factors, undertook a review of literature and discussed this at multi-disciplinary meetings involving the microbiology and immunology teams. This patient was found to have other risk factors for PCP – low CD4 T cells, concomitant use of corticosteroids and hypogammaglobulinaemia (IgG 3.0g/L). Although there is limited evidence that rituximab on its own increases the risk of PCP, there is emerging data that B cells may have a role in the protection against pneumocystis. Following the review, it was concluded that children on rituximab and an additional immunosuppressant (including corticosteroids) should receive prophylactic cotrimoxazole to cover PCP. Methods Retrospective audit carried out by the team to look at adherence to the new guideline regarding the use of cotrimoxazole for PCP prophylaxis in patients who have had rituximab between August 2017 and May 2019. Results P54 Table 1 Total number of patients who had rituximab 10 Number of patients who had other immunosuppressants concomitantly / recently (within previous 3 months) 7 Number of patients on rituximab monotherapy 2 Number of patients who are 6 months post-treatment 1 Number of patients with other risk factors for PCP 1 (hypogammaglobulinaemia) Number of patients who are eligible for prophylaxis, as per the guideline 8 (7 for concomitant immunosuppression and 1 for hypogammaglobulinaemia) Number of patients on cotrimoxazole 7 (87.5%) - one of the patients is on methotrexate, which is advised not to combine with cotrimoxazole We achieved 87.5% compliance in prescribing cotrimoxazole for PCP prophylaxis to all rheumatology patients receiving rituximab alongside another immunosuppressant agent; the one patient who this was not adhered to was due to potential adverse drug pharmacodynamic interaction between cotrimoxazole and methotrexate. Conclusion Although the current evidence points to increased risk of PCP in patients with inherited and iatrogenic defect of T cell function, there is emerging evidence that B cells may have a role too. Hence more work is required to determine the risk of PCP in patients on B cell targeted therapy (BCTT) and the need for prophylaxis. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Pathological Confirmation Of Apparent Metastatic Disease Is Essential: Incidentally Diagnosed Low Grade B Cell Lymphomas In Patients With Solid Tumors

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5059-5059
Author(s):  
Sameh Gaballa ◽  
Cherif Abdelmalek ◽  
Onder Alpdogan ◽  
Rita S. Axelrod ◽  
Barbara Campling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
B Cell Lymphomas

Abstract Background The detection of skeletal metastasis, enlarged lymph nodes or parenchymal lesions in patients (pts) with established solid tumors most commonly denotes advanced stage disease. If not confirmed histologically, a subset of pts might be over staged and mismanaged palliatively. Methods We report 7 cases of low-grade B cell lymphomas diagnosed in a bone, lymph node or lung biopsy during staging workup in patients with suspected metastatic solid tumors. Results All pts were men aged 41 to 80 yo diagnosed with: non-small cell lung (NSCL), prostate, lip squamous cell, bladder, renal cell cancer (CA) and nasal adenoid cystic carcinoma. Imaging studies done during initial workup or follow up after resection of the primary tumor revealed bone metastasis, lymphadenopathy or lung nodules suggesting advanced stage of the primary CA. Invasive workup of the lesions in question revealed incidental low-grade B cell lymphomas (2 low grade lymphomas of bone, 2 CLL/SLL, 1 BALT, 1 marginal zone and 1 nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma). In all cases, this led to down staging and changed the management of the solid CA. Surgical resection of the tumor was done after it was down staged from non-resectable to resectable in 2 pts with head/neck CA; 1 pt with NSCL was down staged from stage IV to IIIA and received chemo/radiotherapy; 1 pt with prostate CA was down staged from stage IV to I; 3 pts were down staged from stage IV and were in remission from previously resected solid tumors. Only 2 pts required therapy for the newly diagnosed lymphoma. Avidity of the lesions revealed SUV ranging from 1.28 to 14.11 in the bone and from 2.17 to 6.98 in the lymph nodes. Conclusions Accurate staging of pts with solid tumors is critical in defining optimal goals of therapy. The growing use of PET/CT scans results in a higher rate of incidentally detected bone lesions or lymphadenopathy. Whereas a number of solid tumors readily spread to bone and lymph nodes, a spectrum of indolent lymphoid disorders may coexist in pts with established solid tumors. These lymphomas may remain asymptomatic for years. This might be misinterpreted as advanced stage solid tumor unless confirmed histologically. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Malignant Lymphoma and Breast Implants: a Case of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) with Implant-near Relapse Localization

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5103-5103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maja Ølholm Vase ◽  
Elisa Jacobsen Pulczynski ◽  
Knud Bendix ◽  
d'Amore Francesco
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Breast Implants ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Thoracic Wall ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Abstract 5103 An increased risk of alk-negative T-cell derived anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (T-ALCL) in patients with breast prostheses has been suggested, although unequivocal evidence of an association has not yet been provided. Several reports have also suggested that silicone, one of the major components of breast prostheses, activates the immune system, and induction of myeloma has been shown in a murine model. While association to breast prostheses has been described in as many as 48 patients with T-cell derived ALCL1, only one case of breast implant-associated B-cell derived lymphoma, displaying a follicular histology2, has been reported so far. We here present a case of DLBCL diagnosed in 2006 in a 66 year-old woman, who had undergone cosmetic implantation of bilateral breast prostheses 20 years previously. The disease initially involved right cervical and mediastinal nodes. She was treated with chemo-immunotherapy (rituximab + CHOP q 3 weeks for a total of 8 series) achieving a complete remission (CR) by summer 2006. Almost 1 year later, a nodal DLBCL relapse occurred at cervical level. The patient was again treated with chemoimmunotherapy (rituximab+ dexamethasone, high-dose cytosine arabinoside and cis-platin q 3 weeks for a total of 3 series). A new CR was obtained and consolidated with an autologous transplant with BEAM conditioning in March 2008. More than a year later, a new cervical node relapse occurred along with a small focus in the lung (not bioptically verified). From then on, the patient received multiple therapies, every time with initial chemosensitivity, but quickly followed by new progression as soon as therapy was discontinued. According to PET assessment, there has never been any tumour manifestation below the diaphragm, and no lymphoma infiltration was detected at any time in the bone marrow. As of June 2010, the patient developed multiple cutaneous and subcutaneous tumours corresponding to the anterior thoracic wall in close proximity to the upper quadrants of both breasts. These tumors were preceeded by an erythematous lesion clearly demarcating the cutaneous area of the anterior thoracic wall and breasts corresponding to the underlying implants. Cutaneous biopsies taken at this erythematous stage already revealed diffuse DLBCL infiltration of the skin and subcutis. Cutaneous and subcutaneous biopsies showed alk-negative, CD30-negative CD20-positive DLBCL. All previous lymph node biopsies are CD20 positive, bcl-2 and bcl-6 positive and negative for CD10. A fraction of tumour cells expressed MUM-1. By and large, no major changes in the immunohistochemical profile of the tumor have been observed since the original diagnosis in 2006. The striking anatomical localization of the latest relapse, but also the fact that the patient's disease over the years persistently manifested itself in lymph node drainage regions adjacent to or in the near proximity of the patient's breast implants, may be suggestive of a chronic antigenic stimulation eventually resulting in a malignant B-cell lymphoproliferation of DLBCL type. DLBCL histology has not previously been reported in possible association with breast implants. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Anti-Spike (S) Antibody Production Post Covid-19 Vaccination after B Cell Depleting Therapy (BCDT) for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2486-2486
Author(s):  
Josselyn Glamyr Molina
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Antibody Production ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Spike Protein ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Introduction: Patients with NHL have a longer duration of illness and higher mortality rate after infection with Covid-19 1-3. Vaccination is strongly recommended to mitigate these problems in the general population, however, patients with cancer were not eligible to enter the pivotal vaccine trials. Furthermore, patients with NHL as well as other hematologic malignancies are frequently treated with B cell depleting therapies (BCDT) such as Rituximab and other anti-CD20 antibodies which in theory affect antibody production after vaccination. There are no data in the literature regarding patients with NHL and scarce data on other tumors concerning the antibody response against the S protein of Sars-Cov-2. To investigate the production of antibodies against the spike protein following vaccination against Sars-Cov-2, we studied 180 patients with cancer. We also aimed to determine if factors such as timing of BCDT in relation to number of days elapsed between such treatment and vaccination, as well as other features such as peripheral blood absolute B cell count correlate with antibody production. Materials and Methods: Anti-spike protein antibody production was evaluated in 104 patients with NHL and 76 with other malignancies. Eligible participants were aged 21 years or older. Study inclusion criteria included diagnosis of lymphoma or other hematological malignancy as well as solid tumors. The Dimension Exel 200 method for qualitative detection of total antibodies was used to determine antibody production. The antibody test was performed &gt; 14 days after the second Moderna or Pfizer vaccine dose or after the Johnson & Johnson single dose. We prospectively evaluated antibody production following administration of BCDT as well as cytotoxic chemotherapy in 104 patients with NHL, 27 hematologic malignancies and in 49 solid tumors. In addition, we explored the timing of such treatments in relation to the vaccination date as well as the type of vaccine administered. Results: Median age was 61 and 59% were females. Of 180 entered, 104 had NHL. Of these, 95 (91.3%) were treated with BCDT, including rituximab (89), obinutuzumab (5) or anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy (1). BCDT was usually given together with induction chemotherapy and followed by maintenance. Histologic types of NHL treated with these therapies were: aggressive NHLs (N=35), follicular low grade (N=33), marginal zone NHL (14) and others (N=13). There were 49 patients with solid tumors. We also included 10 patients with other hematologic tumors who received BCDT and were analyzed together with the 95 NHLs to determine if this treatment interfered with anti-spike antibody production. Conclusions: These results imply a deleterious effect of BCDT on the humoral immune response to the SARS-Cov-2 vaccine. The correlation between the administration of BCDT and poor production of anti-spike antibodies is very robust, particularly in those cases who were vaccinated 9 months or less after BCDT. However, administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy without BCDT was not associated with reduced production of antibodies. In fact, almost all patients (94%) who received cytotoxic chemotherapy without BCDT, produced antibodies against spike protein (table 2). However, when chemotherapy was combined with BCDT there was a significant reduction of antibody production. These results strongly suggest that the major problem with poor antibody production following vaccination against Sars-Cov-2 relates to the use of BCDT and not so much to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The same findings apply to the 104 cases of NHL where half of patients treated with BCDT did not produce antibodies while 88% who did not receive BCDT produced antibodies (table 2). Almost all patients with solid tumors in our study (95.9%) were able to produce antibodies, irrespective of whether they received chemotherapy or not. These data raise the question whether vaccinated patients treated with BCDT who failed to make antibodies against the spike protein, could also benefit from a third dose. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Adoptive Immunotherapy beyond CAR T-Cells

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 743
Author(s):  
Aleksei Titov ◽  
Ekaterina Zmievskaya ◽  
Irina Ganeeva ◽  
Aygul Valiullina ◽  
Alexey Petukhov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Adoptive Immunotherapy ◽  
Γδ T Cells ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Cell Immunotherapy ◽  
Car T

Adoptive cell immunotherapy (ACT) is a vibrant field of cancer treatment that began progressive development in the 1980s. One of the most prominent and promising examples is chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy for the treatment of B-cell hematologic malignancies. Despite success in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas and leukemia, CAR T-cell therapy remains mostly ineffective for solid tumors. This is due to several reasons, such as the heterogeneity of the cellular composition in solid tumors, the need for directed migration and penetration of CAR T-cells against the pressure gradient in the tumor stroma, and the immunosuppressive microenvironment. To substantially improve the clinical efficacy of ACT against solid tumors, researchers might need to look closer into recent developments in the other branches of adoptive immunotherapy, both traditional and innovative. In this review, we describe the variety of adoptive cell therapies beyond CAR T-cell technology, i.e., exploitation of alternative cell sources with a high therapeutic potential against solid tumors (e.g., CAR M-cells) or aiming to be universal allogeneic (e.g., CAR NK-cells, γδ T-cells), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and transgenic T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cell immunotherapies. In addition, we discuss the strategies for selection and validation of neoantigens to achieve efficiency and safety. We provide an overview of non-conventional TCRs and CARs, and address the problem of mispairing between the cognate and transgenic TCRs. Finally, we summarize existing and emerging approaches for manufacturing of the therapeutic cell products in traditional, semi-automated and fully automated Point-of-Care (PoC) systems.

First-in-human dose escalation of ALPN-202, a conditional CD28 costimulator and dual checkpoint inhibitor, in advanced malignancies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2547-2547
Author(s):  
Justin C Moser ◽  
Mark Voskoboynik ◽  
Nehal J. Lakhani ◽  
Michael Millward ◽  
Diwakar Davar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Colorectal Carcinoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibition ◽  
Human Dose ◽  
Cd28 Costimulation ◽  
Advanced Malignancies ◽  
Dose Levels

2547 Background: Strong preclinical rationale has emerged for combining checkpoint inhibition (CPI) with T cell costimulatory agonists, particularly CD28, a critical T cell costimulatory molecule recently recognized as a key target of checkpoint inhibition. ALPN-202 is a variant CD80 vIgD-Fc fusion that mediates PD-L1-dependent CD28 costimulation and inhibits the PD-L1 and CTLA-4 checkpoints. It has demonstrated superiority to CPI-only therapies in tumor models, while demonstrating favorable safety in preclinical toxicology studies. Methods: This is a cohort-based, open-label dose escalation and expansion study of ALPN-202 in adults with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma (NCT04186637). Subjects with cancers refractory to standard therapies (including approved CPIs), or cancers without available standard or curative therapy are eligible. After two planned single-subject cohorts, a standard 3+3 dose escalation has been implemented with two dose schedules in parallel, Q1W and Q3W. Objectives include evaluation of safety and tolerability, PK, PD and preliminary anticancer activity of ALPN-202. Disease assessments are evaluated by RECIST v1.1 for solid tumors or by Lugano Classification for lymphoma. Results: As of January 2021, 20 subjects with advanced malignancies have received ALPN-202. Dose-dependent PK and target saturation have been preliminarily observed. So far, ALPN-202 has been well tolerated at dose levels ranging from 0.001 to 1 mg/kg weekly, with no DLTs. Low-grade skin toxicities (grade 1-2 rash) have been observed in 4 subjects (20%). Among 11 evaluable subjects, an unconfirmed partial response has been observed in one subject with colorectal carcinoma, while stable disease has been observed in 5 subjects with colorectal carcinoma, mesothelioma (2), cholangiocarcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma -- for a preliminary clinical benefit (PR+SD) rate of 100% (4/4) at dose levels of 0.3 mg/kg and higher, or 54% (5/11) overall (table). The meeting presentation will update this data, which is expected to include the conclusion of Q1W dose escalation, as well as immune correlates. Conclusions: First-in-human dose escalation with ALPN-202 has been well tolerated at doses capable of engaging CD28 costimulation in vivo in association with dual PD-L1/CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibition, with early signs of anti-tumor activity. These findings suggest that CD28 agonism can be safely achieved in humans, and further suggest that dose expansion with ALPN-202 is warranted to assess the relevance of controlled CD28 costimulation as a novel approach to cancer immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04186637. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Spectrum of lymphomas across different drug treatment groups in rheumatoid arthritis: a European registries collaborative project

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 2025-2030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise K Mercer ◽  
Anne C Regierer ◽  
Xavier Mariette ◽  
William G Dixon ◽  
Eva Baecklund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
T Cell ◽  
General Population ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Increased Risk

BackgroundLymphomas comprise a heterogeneous group of malignant diseases with highly variable prognosis. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with a twofold increased risk of both Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). It is unknown whether treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) affect the risk of specific lymphoma subtypes.MethodsPatients never exposed to (bionaïve) or ever treated with bDMARDs from 12 European biologic registers were followed prospectively for the occurrence of first ever histologically confirmed lymphoma. Patients were considered exposed to a bDMARD after having received the first dose. Lymphomas were attributed to the most recently received bDMARD.ResultsAmong 124 997 patients (mean age 59 years; 73.7% female), 533 lymphomas were reported. Of these, 9.5% were HL, 83.8% B-cell NHL and 6.8% T-cell NHL. No cases of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma were observed. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most frequent B-cell NHL subtype (55.8% of all B-cell NHLs). The subtype distributions were similar between bionaïve patients and those treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi). For other bDMARDs, the numbers of cases were too small to draw any conclusions. Patients with RA developed more DLBCLs and less chronic lymphocytic leukaemia compared with the general population.ConclusionThis large collaborative analysis of European registries has successfully collated subtype information on 533 lymphomas. While the subtype distribution differs between RA and the general population, there was no evidence of any modification of the distribution of lymphoma subtypes in patients with RA treated with TNFi compared with bionaïve patients.

scholarly journals 221 CRISPR screen identifies loss of IFNγR signaling and downstream adhesion as a resistance mechanism to CAR T-cell cytotoxicity in solid but not liquid tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A234-A234
Author(s):  
Rebecca Larson ◽  
Michael Kann ◽  
Stefanie Bailey ◽  
Nicholas Haradhvala ◽  
Kai Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T Cells ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Car T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

BackgroundChimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) therapy has had a transformative impact on the treatment of hematologic malignancies1–6 but success in solid tumors remains elusive. We hypothesized solid tumors have cell-intrinsic resistance mechanisms to CAR T-cell cytotoxicity.MethodsTo systematically identify resistance pathways, we conducted a genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen in glioblastoma cells, a disease where CAR T-cells have had limited efficacy.7 8 We utilized the glioblastoma cell line U87 and targeted endogenously expressed EGFR with CAR T-cells generated from 6 normal donors for the screen. We validated findings in vitro and in vivo across a variety of human tumors and CAR T-cell antigens.ResultsLoss of genes in the interferon gamma receptor (IFNγR) signaling pathway (IFNγR1, JAK1, JAK2) rendered U87 cells resistant to CAR T-cell killing in vitro. IFNγR1 knockout tumors also showed resistance to CAR T cell treatment in vivo in a second glioblastoma line U251 in an orthotopic model. This phenomenon was irrespective of CAR target as we also observed resistance with IL13Ralpha2 CAR T-cells. In addition, resistance to CAR T-cell cytotoxicity through loss of IFNγR1 applied more broadly to solid tumors as pancreatic cell lines targeted with either Mesothelin or EGFR CAR T-cells also showed resistance. However, loss of IFNγR signaling did not impact sensitivity of liquid tumor lines (leukemia, lymphoma or multiple myeloma) to CAR T-cells in vitro or in an orthotopic model of leukemia treated with CD19 CAR. We isolated the effects of decreased cytotoxicity of IFNγR1 knockout glioblastoma tumors to be cancer-cell intrinsic because CAR T-cells had no observable differences in proliferation, activation (CD69 and LFA-1), or degranulation (CD107a) when exposed to wildtype versus knockout tumors. Using transcriptional profiling, we determined that glioblastoma cells lacking IFNγR1 had lower upregulation of cell adhesion pathways compared to wildtype glioblastoma cells after exposure to CAR T-cells. We found that loss of IFNγR1 reduced CAR T-cell binding avidity to glioblastoma.ConclusionsThe critical role of IFNγR signaling for susceptibility of solid tumors to CAR T-cells is surprising given that CAR T-cells do not require traditional antigen-presentation pathways. Instead, in glioblastoma tumors, IFNγR signaling was required for sufficient adhesion of CAR T-cells to mediate productive cytotoxicity. Our work demonstrates that liquid and solid tumors differ in their interactions with CAR T-cells and suggests that enhancing T-cell/tumor interactions may yield improved responses in solid tumors.AcknowledgementsRCL was supported by T32 GM007306, T32 AI007529, and the Richard N. Cross Fund. ML was supported by T32 2T32CA071345-21A1. SRB was supported by T32CA009216-38. NJH was supported by the Landry Cancer Biology Fellowship. JJ is supported by a NIH F31 fellowship (1F31-MH117886). GG was partially funded by the Paul C. Zamecnik Chair in Oncology at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and NIH R01CA 252940. MVM and this work is supported by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, Stand Up to Cancer, NIH R01CA 252940, R01CA238268, and R01CA249062.ReferencesMaude SL, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018;378:439–448.Neelapu SS, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2531–2544.Locke FL, et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1–2 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2019;20:31–42.Schuster SJ, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells in refractory B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2545–2554.Wang M, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1331–1342.Cohen AD, et al. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest 2019;129:2210–2221.Bagley SJ, et al. CAR T-cell therapy for glioblastoma: recent clinical advances and future challenges. Neuro-oncology 2018;20:1429–1438.Choi BD, et al. Engineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells to treat glioblastoma. J Target Ther Cancer 2017;6:22–25.Ethics ApprovalAll human samples were obtained with informed consent and following institutional guidelines under protocols approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at the Massachusetts General Hospital (2016P001219). Animal work was performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (2015N000218 and 2020N000114).

scholarly journals Anlotinib Shows Potent Antileukemia Effects in B-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia through the Blockage of Angiogenic Related Pathways

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 49-49
Author(s):  
Qiuling Chen ◽  
Yuelong Jiang ◽  
Qinwei Chen ◽  
Long Liu ◽  
Bing Xu
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advanced Lung Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Effects

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) derives from the malignant transformation of lymphoid progenitor cells with ~85% being originated from B-cell progenitors (B-ALL). Despite fairly good prognoses for most pediatric B-ALL patients, the outcome is fatal in over 50% of adult patients who have a recurrent or progressive disease and lack of effective therapeutic approaches. Therefore, novel treatment strategies with high efficacy and low toxicity are an unmet need for B-ALL patients, especially those with relapsed or refractory status. Angiogenesis is a process of new vessel formation that requires the participation of multiple proangiogenic factors (e.g., VEGF, PDGF, and FGF) and their corresponding receptors (e.g., VEGFR, PDGFR, and FGFR). Angiogenesis, a well-established feature of solid tumors, also contributes to leukemia progression and correlates with the involvement of specific sanctuary sites in ALL, highlighting that the perturbation of angiogenesis would be an attractive approach for ALL treatment. Anlotinib is an oral tyrosine kinase (TKI) inhibitor with a broad range of antitumor effects via the suppression of VEGFR, PDGFR and FGFR. Of importance, anlotinib has been approved for the treatment of advanced lung cancer in China. Here, we evaluated the antileukemia activity of anlotinib in preclinical B-ALL models and its underlying molecular mechanisms. In this study, we observed that anlotinib significantly blunted the capability of cell proliferation and arrested cell cycle at G2 phase in B-ALL cell lines. Subsequently, we found that anlotinib resulted in remarkably enhanced apoptosis in B-ALL in vitro. To assess the in vivo antileukemia potential, we established a B-ALL patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model and then treated the B-ALL PDX model with anlotinib. As a result, oral administration of anlotinib pronouncedly delayed in vivo B-ALL cell growth and reduced leukemia burden with acceptable safety profiles in this model. As for the mechanism of action, the antileukemia effect of anlotinib was associated with the disruption of the role of VEGFR2, PDGFRb, and FGFR3. Moreover, we revealed that this drug blocked the PI3K/AKT/mTOR/ signaling, a pathway that is linked with angiogenesis and its proangiogenic regulators, including VEGFR2, PDGFRb, and FGFR3. In aggregate, these results indicate that anlotinib is a potent antitumor agent for the treatment of B-ALL via the inhibition of angiogenic relevant pathways, which provide a novel potential treatment intervention for patients with B-ALL who have little effective therapy options. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Anlotinib originally designed by China is a novel orally active multitarget inhibitor that is evaluating in clinical trials against multiple solid tumors.

scholarly journals Novel CD19/CD22 Bicistronic Chimeric Antigen Receptors Outperform Single or Bivalent Cars in Eradicating CD19+CD22+, CD19-, and CD22- Pre-B Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 810-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiying Qin ◽  
Sang M Nguyen ◽  
Sneha Ramakrishna ◽  
Samiksha Tarun ◽  
Lila Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Single Chain ◽  
Dual Targeting ◽  
Single Antigen ◽  
Therapeutic Function

Abstract Treatment of pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) using chimeric antigen receptor expressing T cells (CART) targeting CD19 have demonstrated impressive clinical results in children and young adults with up to 70-90% complete remission rate in multiple clinical trials. However, about 30% of patients relapse due to loss of the targeted epitope on CD19 or CART failure. Our CD22-targeted CAR trial has generated promising results in relapsed/refractory ALL, including CD19 antigen negative ALL, but relapse associated with decreased CD22 site density has occurred. Thus, developing strategies to prevent relapses due to changes in antigen expression have the potential to increase the likelihood of durable remissions. In addition, dual targeting of both CD19 and CD22 on pre-B ALL may be synergistic compared to targeting a single antigen, a potential approach to improve efficacy in patients with heterogeneous expression of CD19 and CD22 on leukemic blasts. We describe the systematic development and comparison of the structure and therapeutic function of three different types (over 15 different constructs) of novel CARs targeting both CD19 and CD22: (1) Bivalent Tandem CAR, (2) Bivalent Loop CAR, and (3) Bicistronic CAR. These dual CARs were assembled using CD19- and CD22-binding single chain fragment variable (scFv) regions derived from clinically validated single antigen targeted CARs. They are structurally different in design: both tandem and loop CARs have the CD19 and CD22 scFv covalently linked in the same CAR in different orders, whereas, bicistronic CARs have 2 complete CAR constructs connected with a cleavable linker. The surface expression on the transduced T cell of the CD19/CD22 dual CARs was detected with CD22 Fc and anti-idiotype of CD19 and compared to single CD19 or CD22 CARs. Activities of dual CARs to either CD19 or CD22 were evaluated in vitro with cytotoxicity assays or killing assays against K562 cells expressing either CD19 or CD22 or both antigens and also tested against a leukemia CD19+/CD22+ cell line, NALM6, and NALM6 with CRISPER/CAS9 knockout of CD19 or CD22 or both antigens. Therapeutic function of the top candidates of the dual CARs was then validated in vivo against these NALM6 leukemia lines. Some of these dual CARs were also further tested against patient-derived xenografts. Finally, we tested the dual targeting CARs in an artificial relapse model in which mice were co-injected with a mix of CD19 knockout and CD22 knockout NALM6 leukemia lines. From these studies, we established that the order of the scFv, size of the linker, type of leader sequence, and co-stimulatory domain in the CAR constructs all impact the efficacy of the dual targeting CARs. Tandem, Loop, and Bicistronic CARs all demonstrate some levels of in vitro and in vivo activities, but the bicistronic CAR was most effective at clearing leukemia and preventing relapse. In the CD19+/CD22+ NALM6 model, bicistronic CAR treated mice remain disease free while CD19 CAR or CD22 CAR treated mice already died or relapsed on day 27. In the relapse model, as expected, CD19 or CD22 single CAR T cell treatment resulted in progression of the corresponding antigen-negative NALM6. Treatment with dual targeted bicistronic CARs resulted in clearance of both CD19 and CD22 negative ALL with durable remission. In summary, we described novel CD19/CD22 dual targeting CARs with robust pre-clinical activity against pre-B cell ALL, and validated this approach in the prevention of resistance to single-antigen targeted CARs in preclinical models. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document