scholarly journals Novel Diagnostic Assays for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 267-267
Author(s):  
Adam Cuker ◽  
Ann H Rux ◽  
Jillian L Hinds ◽  
May Dela Cruz ◽  
Serge Yarovoi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
B Lymphocyte ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

Abstract Abstract 267 Introduction Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic disorder mediated by platelet, monocyte, and endothelial cell-activating antibodies (Abs) against ultralarge complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Laboratory testing plays a key role in the diagnosis of HIT, but is associated with important shortcomings. Immunoassays such as the PF4/heparin ELISA frequently yield false-positive results due to their inability to discriminate cellular activating-Abs from their non-pathogenic counterparts. Functional assays such as the 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA) are more specific, but are unfeasible for most clinical laboratories due to the requirement for radioisotope and fresh platelets from reactive donors. KKO is a monoclonal Ab that causes a HIT-like thrombocytopenic disorder in a mouse model. Binding of KKO to immobilized PF4/heparin is inhibited by human HIT plasma, but not by plasma from patients with non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin Abs.1 We exploited this property of KKO to develop a KKO-inhibition (KKO-I) ELISA to detect platelet-activating Abs. We recently described a system to measure cell activation by HIT Abs: DT40 (chicken B lymphocyte) cells transfected with human FcgRIIa coupled to a luciferase reporter.2 We hypothesized that this system (DT40-luc) could be used to identify cell-activating anti-PF4/heparin Abs without need for donor platelets or radioactivity. Here we describe the KKO-I and DT40-luc assays and compare their performance to two commercially available immunoassays and the SRA in samples from 58 patients with suspected HIT and circulating anti-PF4/heparin Abs. Methods Patient samples consecutively referred to a clinical coagulation laboratory for HIT laboratory testing that tested positive by polyspecific anti-PF4/heparin ELISA were included. In addition to the polyspecific ELISA, citrated plasma samples from all patients were tested by an IgG-specific PF4/heparin ELISA, an in-house SRA, and the investigational KKO-I and DT40-luc assays. A 4Ts score to estimate the clinical likelihood of HIT was determined for each subject. The investigator performing 4Ts scoring was blinded to the results of HIT laboratory assays. Investigators performing the KKO-I and DT40-luc assays were blinded to the 4Ts score and the results of the SRA and anti-PF4/heparin ELISA. The KKO-I and DT40-luc assays were performed as previously described.1,2 HIT was defined as the combination of an intermediate or high probability 4Ts score (≥4) and a positive SRA. The performance of each assay with respect to this reference standard was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were calculated and compared using the Delong method for correlated samples. Results Fifty-eight subjects were enrolled, 21 of whom met prespecified criteria for HIT. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the 21 HIT-positive and 37 HIT-negative subjects. The ability of the polyspecific ELISA, IgG-specific ELISA, KKO-I, and DT40-luc assay to discriminate HIT-positive from HIT-negative subjects is shown in Figure 1. HIT-positive plasma showed significantly greater mean inhibition of KKO binding than HIT-negative plasma (70.1%, 95% CI 64.8–75.4 vs. 40.4%, 33.5–47.4, p<0.0001) (Figure 1C). Plasma from HIT-positive subjects also induced significantly greater luciferase activity (3.14, 2.25–4.03 vs. 0.96, 0.85–1.07, p<0.0001) in the DT40-luc assay (Figure 1D). ROC curves for each assay are shown in Figure 2. The AUC for KKO-I (0.92, 0.85–1.00) was significantly greater than the AUC for the polyspecific (0.82, 0.70–0.95) and IgG-specific (0.76, 0.62–0.90) ELISAs (p<0.05 for both comparisons). The AUC for DT40-luc (0.89, 0.79–0.99) was significantly greater than the AUC for the IgG-specific (p=0.046), but not the polyspecific ELISA (p=0.28). Conclusion KKO-I and DT40-luc showed better discrimination than commercially available ELISAs in a small cohort of patients with suspected HIT and anti-PF4/heparin Abs. These assays are simple to perform, do not require donor platelets or radioactivity, and hold promise for improving the specificity and feasibility of HIT laboratory testing. Further evaluation in a larger cohort of patients is required. Disclosures: Cuker: Baxter: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Canyon: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stago: Research Funding. Arepally:Teva Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Cines:Amgen: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; T2 Biosystems: Research Funding.

Comparison of Antigen and Activation Assays with a Probability Scoring Model for the Diagnosis of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3215-3215
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Scarvelis ◽  
Gail Rock
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Platelet Response ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
Heparin Anticoagulation

Background: Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a syndrome characterized by thrombocytopenia and an elevated risk of thrombosis. In the evaluation of patients with suspected HIT, laboratory testing is used to help differentiate between those patients who have HIT and those who do not and therefore do not require non-heparin anticoagulation. Laboratory tests include activation (serotonin release, heparin-induced platelet aggregation, ATP luminescence) and antigen (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbant assay (ELISA)) assays directed against the platelet factor 4-heparin or PF4/PVS complex. A pre-test scoring system (Warkentin 4T’s) has been derived to assess the probability of HIT which can be used in conjunction with laboratory testing in the evaluation for HIT. Objectives: To compare the activation assay used at The Ottawa Hospital (ATP luminescence) with the PF4 enhanced® ELISA and correlate results with clinical data. Methods: Patients undergoing HIT testing were identified. ELISA and activation assays were performed. Charts were reviewed in order to derive a 4T’s score and to assess response to therapeutic non-heparin anticoagulation (when administered). Correlation between ELISA, activation assay, 4T’s score and platelet response to alternative anticoagulation was determined. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of laboratory tests or 4T’s scores were calculated depending on the measure chosen as the reference standard to diagnose HIT. Results: 111 patients undergoing HIT testing were evaluated. 41 and 43 were positive by ELISA (OD > 0.4) or activation assay respectively. 12 were positive only by ELISA (mean optical density (OD): 1.27) and 10 were positive by both activation assay and ELISA (mean OD: 2.28). Clinical information was available for 70 patients. 26 of these received therapeutic non-heparin anticoagulation as treatment for suspected HIT. Reference standard= activation assay: ELISA: Sens 95% (95% CI 73–99%), Spec 80% (66–89%), PPV 66% (46–81%), NPV 98% (86–100%). 4T’s (low vs. high score): Sens 85% (54–97%), Spec 95% (83–99%), PPV 85% (54–97%), NPV 95% (83–99%). ELISA OD > 1.5 + high 4T’s score: Sens 61% (36–82%), Spec 100% (56–100%), PPV 100% (68–100%), NPV 50% (24–76%). Reference standard= 4T’s score (high and low score only, excludes intermediate category): ELISA: Sens 85% (53–97%), Spec 77% (61–88%), PPV 52% (30–74%), NPV 94% (79–99%). Activation: Sens 85% (54–97%), Spec 95% (83–99%), PPV 85% (54–97%), NPV 95% (83–99%). Reference standard= “clear response to non-heparin anticoagulation” defined as significant platelet increase within 48 hours of start of therapy and no other explanation for platelet recovery: ELISA: Sens 100% (72–100%), Spec 54% (26–80%), PPV 68% (43–86%), NPV 100% (56–100%). Activation: Sens 85% (54–97%), Spec 69% (39–90%), PPV 73% (45–91%), NPV 82% (48–97%). 4T’s (low vs. high score): Sens 90% (54–99%), Spec 100% (60–100%), PPV 100% (63–100%), NPV 89% (51–99%). ELISA OD > 1.5 + 4T’s (low vs. high score): Sens 89% (51–99%), Spec 100% (56–100%), PPV 100% (60–100%), NPV 88% (47–99%). Conclusions: A high 4T’s score best predicts a clinical response to non-heparin therapeutic anticoagulation when HIT is suspected. ELISA OD > 1.5 does not add additional information in this respect. A negative ELISA and a low 4T’s score have comparable NPVs when an activation assay is the reference standard. Future trials should employ a clinical reference standard such as “clear response to non-heparin anticoagulation” when evaluating the operator characteristics of HIT assays.

scholarly journals Predictors of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Adult Cardiac Surgery Patients

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4705-4705
Author(s):  
Kari Allan ◽  
Jessica Crow ◽  
Jessica Chasler ◽  
Janhavi Athale ◽  
John Lindsley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Post Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Background: The 4Ts, HIT-Expert Probability (HEP), and Post-Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) screening tools for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) have not been validated in cardiac surgery patients. Evidence remains unclear regarding which screening tool most accurately predicts HIT in this population. Methods: HIT-positive and HIT-negative patients who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery within a six-year period were matched 1:2 in a case-control design. Each patient was scored with the 4Ts, HEP, and CPB tools. Sensitivities and specificities of each tool were calculated using standard cut-offs. The Youden method was utilized to determine optimal cut-offs in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of each score, then sensitivities and specificities were recalculated. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the association of scoring tool components and relevant clinical characteristics with HIT. Results: Using standard cut-offs for the scoring tools, sensitivities for the CPB, HEP, and 4Ts tools were 100%, 93.9%, and 69.4%, respectively. Specificities were 51%, 49%, and 71.4%, respectively. Using the Youden method-derived optimal cut-offs, sensitivity of the CPB score remained 100% with improved specificity to 88.9%. Sensitivity of the 4Ts score declined to 51% and specificity improved to 93.9%. Pattern of platelet decline, absence of clinically significant bleed, body mass index, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and postoperative heparin duration were significantly associated with HIT. Conclusions: The 4Ts score has limited utility in cardiac surgery patients, whereas the CPB and HEP scores with standard cut-offs demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity. A cut-off of 3 points or higher on the CPB score could increase specificity while preserving high sensitivity. Disclosures Crow: Research Point Global: Other: Clinical and coding data review services. Streiff:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Low Level Platelet-Activating Antibodies in Patients Suspected of Having Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia but Testing Negative in the ”Gold Standard” Functional Test

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2757-2757
Author(s):  
Ishac Nazi ◽  
Donald M Arnold ◽  
James W Smith ◽  
Theodore E. Warkentin ◽  
Jane C Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Heparin Therapy ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Increased Sensitivity ◽  
Clinical Conditions

Abstract Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common drug reaction that causes arterial or venous thrombosis as a result of heparin therapy. Platelet-activating antibodies, against complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, cause intense platelet activation, ultimately leading to an increased risk of thrombosis, limb-loss and even death. Most patients exposed to heparin will produce non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies while only a small number will produce platelet-activating and HIT-causing antibodies (pathogenic HIT antibodies). Among HIT tests, the functional assays, such as the serotonin release assay (SRA), correlate best with the disease because they can specifically identify the pathogenic HIT antibodies whereas the enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) cannot. We have previously shown that anti-PF4/heparin antibody production precedes thrombocytopenia in HIT patients (Warkentin et al., Blood 2009 113: 4963-4969) possibly indicating the need for a threshold plasma level of pathogenic HIT antibody, among other factors, to cause the disease. The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of low levels of pathogenic HIT antibodies in samples from patients suspected of HIT who had detectable anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in the EIA (EIA-positive), but who did not have platelet-activating antibodies in the standard SRA (SRA-negative). Methods: We used an in-house IgG-specific EIA to detect the presence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (EIA-positive: OD405nm> 0.45) and the standard SRA to detect the presence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies (SRA-positive: release >20% with 0.1-0.3 IU/mL of unfractionated heparin). We developed an enhanced SRA (eSRA) by adding increasing concentrations of exogenous PF4 (0-100 μg/mL) to detect sub-threshold levels of platelet activating antibodies undetectable in the standard SRA (eSRA-positive: release >20%). Samples tested were referred for HIT testing by the McMaster Platelet Immunology Laboratory (Hamilton, Canada). Results: Sera from healthy individuals (n=10) and from suspected HIT patients with a negative anti-PF4/heparin EIA (n=15) did not demonstrate platelet activation in the eSRA at any dose of exogenous PF4 added. SRA-positive sera (n = 7), diluted sufficiently that they were non-reactive in the standard SRA, demonstrated PF4 dose-dependent platelet activation in the eSRA. This confirmed the increased sensitivity of the eSRA in detecting low-titre platelet-activating antibodies. Reactivity in the eSRA was inhibited by high heparin (100 U/mL) and by blocking the platelet FcgRIIa receptor with the monoclonal antibody IV.3. We then tested samples (n=24) referred for HIT testing that were positive in the anti-PF4/heparin EIA (optical densities OD405nm 0.7 to 2.4) but negative in the standard SRA. Heparin-dependent platelet activation (20-99% release) was demonstrated in 11 of 24 (46%) in the eSRA. This reactivity directly correlated with the amount of PF4 added to the platelets (optimal concentration of PF4 12.5 - 100 μg/mL) but not with the strength (OD405nm) of the anti-PF4/heparin EIA. In further investigations, we concentrated (4-fold) 7 of the 11 eSRA-positive samples in an attempt to increase the concentration of the antibodies. Of those 7 samples, 5 (71%) became positive in the standard SRA upon testing of the concentrated sample. Conclusions: These data indicate that low-titre platelet-activating antibodies may be found in some patients suspected of having HIT that test negative in the standard SRA irrespective of the strength (OD405nm) of the anti-PF4/heparin EIA. The immune response during heparin therapy can produce both families of pathogenic and non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies but it is the titre of the pathogenic antibody that may be necessary for platelet activation. Perhaps under permissive clinical conditions and with patient-specific factors, the titre of the pathogenic HIT antibodies may increase and lead to HIT. Disclosures Warkentin: Pfizer Canada: Honoraria; Instrumentation Laboratory: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; W.L. Gore: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Fluid-Phase Immune Complexes Can Assemble and Activate Platelets in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3746-3746
Author(s):  
Angela Huynh ◽  
Donald M. Arnold ◽  
James W. Smith ◽  
Taylor D. Elliott ◽  
Hina Bhakta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Immune Complexes ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Fluid Phase ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Antibody Binding ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Platelet Surface ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

Abstract Introduction: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a complication of heparin therapy that is caused by antibodies to complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Several studies have reported that in order for these immune complexes to be pathogenic, they must assemble on the platelet surface. When bound to the platelet surface, the conformation of PF4 allows for optimal presentation of the epitope for antibody binding and subsequent activation of Fc-receptors on platelets and monocytes. To what degree pathogenic HIT immune complexes can form and activate platelets in fluid-phase as with other immune complex diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, glomerulonephritis, and rheumatoid arthritis) is not known. We used mutated PF4 proteins that can no longer bind the platelet surface to evaluate anti-PF4/heparin antibody induced platelet activation. We hypothesized that the epitopes required for PF4 binding of HIT antibodies and subsequent platelet activation can be formed in fluid-phase. Methods: Each of the 70 amino acids of PF4 were mutated previously by alanine scanning mutagenesis where non-alanine residues were mutated to alanine or alanine residues to valine. We selected 14 PF4 mutants that affected KKO (a platelet-activating murine monoclonal HIT-like antibody) binding in a heparin-capture assay for this study. Mutant and wild-type PF4 were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and affinity purified. To confirm binding to platelets, biotin-conjugated PF4 mutants were incubated with donor platelets and PF4 platelet binding was measured using streptavidin-FITC by flow cytometry. Platelet activation was measured using a modified 14C-serotonin-release assay, where excess wild-type or mutant PF4 (0, 50 and 100 μg/mL) was added to 14C-serotonin-labelled donor platelets and activation was measured after incubation with KKO. ≥20% 14C-serotonin release was considered positive for platelet activation. Platelet activation was correlated with platelet surface binding to identify mutants that could form surface-bound or fluid-phase antigenic complexes. Results: Of the 14 PF4 mutants tested, 7 bound to platelet surfaces and 11 supported platelet activation by KKO. These PF4 mutants were further characterized into 3 categories: PF4 mutants that bound to the platelet surface and induced platelet activation (n=6); PF4 mutants that did not bind to the platelet surface but induced platelet activation (n=5); and PF4 mutants that bound to the platelet surface but did not induce platelet activation (n=1). These results indicate that certain PF4 mutants were able to bind KKO and induce platelet activation in fluid-phase. These data suggest that specific epitopes in fluid-phase PF4/heparin immune complexes can mediate platelet activation in HIT, without the need for surface assembly on the platelet. Conclusions: Using point mutations of PF4, we have identified that the HIT antigenic complexes can be formed in fluid-phase and induce platelet activation. Further studies are required to investigate the role of a fluid-phase HIT antigen complex in the development of thrombocytopenia, inflammation and thrombosis of HIT. This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Disclosures Arnold: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; UCB: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Rivaroxaban for Treatment of Suspected or Confirmed Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3468-3468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Ann Linkins ◽  
Theodore E. Warkentin ◽  
Menaka Pai ◽  
Sudeep Shivakumar ◽  
Rizwan Manji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Arterial Thromboembolism ◽  
Routine Coagulation

Abstract Rivaroxaban is an ideal potential alternative for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia because it is administered orally by fixed dosing, requires no routine coagulation monitoring and has been proven effective in the treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism in other settings. The Rivaroxaban for HIT Study prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of patients with suspected or confirmed HIT who were treated with rivaroxaban [NCT01598168 - investigator sponsored study funded by Bayer] Methods: Canadian multicenter, single-arm, prospective cohort study of patients with confirmed or suspected HIT (4Ts score ≥4) treated with rivaroxaban 15 mg bid until the diagnosis was supported or refuted using the local HIT assay. Participants with HIT (positive local assay result) received rivaroxaban 15 mg bid until platelet recovery (or until Day 21 if the patient had acute thrombosis; HITT) then stepped down to rivaroxaban 20 mg daily until Day 30. Central testing with the serotonin-release assay (SRA) was performed (not in real-time at all centres). HIT positive was defined as a 4Ts score ≥4 plus serotonin release ≥50%. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of new symptomatic, objectively-confirmed venous and arterial thromboembolism in the combined cohort of patients with suspected and confirmed HIT at 30 days. Secondary objectives included incidence of symptomatic thromboembolism while on treatment with rivaroxaban (combined cohort) and the following outcomes among SRA-positive participants while on treatment with rivaroxaban: incidence of venous and arterial thromboembolism, incidence of major bleeding, and time to platelet recovery. Sample size of 200 participants (10 to 30 with SRA-confirmed HIT) was based on feasibility and an anticipated thrombotic event rate in the study population (combined cohort) of 6.5% at 30 days (5% in HIT negative; 11% in HIT positive while on rivaroxaban). Results: 22 participants (12 HIT positive) were enrolled between January 2013 and July 2015. The study was terminated early due to poor recruitment, but after enrolling the minimum expected number of HIT positive participants. Of the 12 HIT positive participants (SRA, mean release 95%), 3(25%) had HITT at time of study entry and 6 had received at least one dose of fondaparinux prior to study enrolment. Half of the HIT positive participants were enrolled in study after the SRA result had already been reported as positive. After 371 days of exposure to rivaroxaban (combined cohort), 1 HIT positive participant had possible symptomatic recurrent VTE (4.5%, 95% CI: 0 to 23.5%), 1 HIT positive participant had major bleeding (9 days after rivaroxaban was held) and there were 4 deaths (cancer 2, sepsis 1, end-stage COPD 1). The single episode of possible recurrent VTE was extension of previously documented apheresis catheter-related arm DVT in a HIT positive participant who presented on Day 7 with worsening arm pain. A repeat ultrasound showed extension of DVT; however a baseline scan had not been performed at time of study entry. Interestingly, the same participant failed treatment with fondaparinux prior to study enrolment (development of erythematous plaques at injection sites and failure of platelets to rise). His apheresis catheter was removed on Day 8, rivaroxaban was continued and complete resolution of his symptoms as well as platelet recovery was achieved. One HIT positive participant presented with evidence of bilateral lower limb arterial ischemia (HIT-related acute arterial thrombosis on documented chronic peripheral vascular disease) at the time of study enrolment. Despite achieving platelet recovery, he underwent bilateral below knee amputation on Day 16. Out of the 12 HIT positive participants, 11 achieved platelet recovery with mean time to recovery 9 days. The single participant who did not achieve platelet recovery received only 2 doses of rivaroxaban before it was held due to a transient rise in liver enzymes. Rivaroxaban was never restarted because he bled while receiving fondaparinux as an alternative. Conclusions: Rivaroxaban appears to be effective for treating patients with confirmed HIT, although lack of a comparator and a small sample size are limitations of our findings. The advantages of rivaroxaban over other agents currently used to treat HIT such as ease of administration, lack of routine coagulation monitoring and low cost make it an attractive option. Disclosures Linkins: Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: rivaroxaban has not been approved for treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Warkentin:W.L. Gore: Consultancy, Research Funding; Instrumentation Laboratory: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Pai:Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS-Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shivakumar:Bayer: Honoraria. Wells:Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS-Pfizer: Research Funding. Wu:Pfizer Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Distinct Gene Expression Signatures in Patients with Richter's Syndrome and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Prior Exposure to Ibrutinib

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Hanyin Wang ◽  
Shulan Tian ◽  
Qing Zhao ◽  
Wendy Blumenschein ◽  
Jennifer H. Yearley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell Activation ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Upregulated Genes

Introduction: Richter's syndrome (RS) represents transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) into a highly aggressive lymphoma with dismal prognosis. Transcriptomic alterations have been described in CLL but most studies focused on peripheral blood samples with minimal data on RS-involved tissue. Moreover, transcriptomic features of RS have not been well defined in the era of CLL novel therapies. In this study we investigated transcriptomic profiles of CLL/RS-involved nodal tissue using samples from a clinical trial cohort of refractory CLL and RS patients treated with Pembrolizumab (NCT02332980). Methods: Nodal samples from 9 RS and 4 CLL patients in MC1485 trial cohort were reviewed and classified as previously published (Ding et al, Blood 2017). All samples were collected prior to Pembrolizumab treatment. Targeted gene expression profiling of 789 immune-related genes were performed on FFPE nodal samples using Nanostring nCounter® Analysis System (NanoString Technologies, Seattle, WA). Differential expression analysis was performed using NanoStringDiff. Genes with 2 fold-change in expression with a false-discovery rate less than 5% were considered differentially expressed. Results: The details for the therapy history of this cohort were illustrated in Figure 1a. All patients exposed to prior ibrutinib before the tissue biopsy had developed clinical progression while receiving ibrutinib. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering using the 300 most variable genes in expression revealed two clusters: C1 and C2 (Figure 1b). C1 included 4 RS and 3 CLL treated with prior chemotherapy without prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with prior ibrutinib. C2 included 1 CLL and 3 RS received prior ibrutinib, and 1 RS treated with chemotherapy. The segregation of gene expression profiles in samples was largely driven by recent exposure to ibrutinib. In C1 cluster (majority had no prior ibrutinb), RS and CLL samples were clearly separated into two subgroups (Figure 1b). In C2 cluster, CLL 8 treated with ibrutinib showed more similarity in gene expression to RS, than to other CLL samples treated with chemotherapy. In comparison of C2 to C1, we identified 71 differentially expressed genes, of which 34 genes were downregulated and 37 were upregulated in C2. Among the upregulated genes in C2 (majority had prior ibrutinib) are known immune modulating genes including LILRA6, FCGR3A, IL-10, CD163, CD14, IL-2RB (figure 1c). Downregulated genes in C2 are involved in B cell activation including CD40LG, CD22, CD79A, MS4A1 (CD20), and LTB, reflecting the expected biological effect of ibrutinib in reducing B cell activation. Among the 9 RS samples, we compared gene profiles between the two groups of RS with or without prior ibrutinib therapy. 38 downregulated genes and 10 upregulated genes were found in the 4 RS treated with ibrutinib in comparison with 5 RS treated with chemotherapy. The top upregulated genes in the ibrutinib-exposed group included PTHLH, S100A8, IGSF3, TERT, and PRKCB, while the downregulated genes in these samples included MS4A1, LTB and CD38 (figure 1d). In order to delineate the differences of RS vs CLL, we compared gene expression profiles between 5 RS samples and 3 CLL samples that were treated with only chemotherapy. RS samples showed significant upregulation of 129 genes and downregulation of 7 genes. Among the most significantly upregulated genes are multiple genes involved in monocyte and myeloid lineage regulation including TNFSF13, S100A9, FCN1, LGALS2, CD14, FCGR2A, SERPINA1, and LILRB3. Conclusion: Our study indicates that ibrutinib-resistant, RS-involved tissues are characterized by downregulation of genes in B cell activation, but with PRKCB and TERT upregulation. Furthermore, RS-involved nodal tissues display the increased expression of genes involved in myeloid/monocytic regulation in comparison with CLL-involved nodal tissues. These findings implicate that differential therapies for RS and CLL patients need to be adopted based on their prior therapy and gene expression signatures. Studies using large sample size will be needed to verify this hypothesis. Figure Disclosures Zhao: Merck: Current Employment. Blumenschein:Merck: Current Employment. Yearley:Merck: Current Employment. Wang:Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding. Parikh:Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kenderian:Sunesis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Torque: Consultancy; Kite: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kay:Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Ding:DTRM: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Perfusion ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J DeBois ◽  
Junli Liu ◽  
Leonard Y Lee ◽  
Leonard N Girardi ◽  
Charles Mack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Platelet Inhibition ◽  
Heparin Therapy ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitor ◽  
Heparin Infusion ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Life Threatening

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major side effect secondary to the administration of heparin. This syndrome is serious and potentially life threatening. This response is the result of antibodies formed against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. The incidence of this immune-mediated syndrome has been estimated to be 1-3% of all patients receiving heparin therapy. The occurrence of HIT in patients requiring full anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), therefore, presents a serious challenge to the cardiac surgery team. The diagnosis of HIT should be based on both clinical and laboratory evidence. While functional assays, platelet aggregation tests, and the serotonin release assay can be used to support the diagnosis, the negative predictive value of these tests is generally less than 50%. In contrast, although non-functional antibody detection assays are more sensitive, they have a low specificity. HIT can be treated in several ways, including cessation of all heparin and giving an alternative thrombin inhibitor, platelet inhibition followed by heparin infusion, and the use of low molecular weight heparins. In this presentation, the pathology and current diagnostic tests, as well as the successful management of patients with HIT undergoing CPB at New York Presbyterian Hospital, are reviewed.

Pathophysiology of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1657-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Fabris ◽  
Sarfraz Ahmad ◽  
Giuseppe Cella ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Cellular Activation ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
New Information ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Release Assay

Abstract Objective.—This review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the most frequent and dangerous side effect of heparin exposure, covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease syndrome. Data Sources and Study Selection.—Current consensus of opinion is given based on literature reports, as well as new information where available. A comprehensive analysis of the reasons for discrepancies in incidence numbers is given. The currently known mechanism is that HIT is mediated by an antibody to the complex of heparin–platelet factor 4, which binds to the Fc receptor on platelets. New evidence suggests a functional heterogeneity in the anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies generated to heparin, and a “superactive” heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody that does not require the presence of heparin to promote platelet activation or aggregation has been identified. Up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory markers, as well as preactivation of platelets/endothelial cells/leukocytes, are also considered to be related to the pathophysiology of HIT. Issues related to the specificity of currently available and new laboratory assays that support a clinical diagnosis are addressed in relation to the serotonin-release assay. Past experience with various anticoagulant treatments is reviewed with a focus on the recent successes of thrombin inhibitors and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to combat the platelet activation and severe thrombotic episodes associated with HIT. Conclusions.—The pathophysiology of HIT is multifactorial. However, the primary factor in the mediation of the cellular activation is due to the generation of an antibody to the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. This review is written as a reference for HIT research.

Serologic Results in >1000 Patients With Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh G. Shelat ◽  
Anne Tomaski ◽  
Eleanor S. Pollak
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Pathogenic Antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis. HIT is thought to be initiated by the interaction of pathogenic antibodies toward a complex platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (PF4:H), which can activate platelets and predispose to thrombosis. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT includes antigenic and functional assays to detect antibodies directed at PF4:H complexes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 consecutive samples tested by serotonin-release assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most samples showed no serologic evidence of HIT, whereas 4% to 5% of samples demonstrated both antigenic and functional serological evidence for HIT. Approximately 12% to 18% of samples showed immunologic evidence of anti-PF4:H antibodies but without functional evidence of serotonin release in vitro. Interestingly, a small minority of samples (0.7%) caused serotonin release but were negative in the ELISA. The results are presented using cutoff values established at our hospital and for the ELISA manufacturer. This study provides a pretest probability of the serologic results from an antigenic assay (ELISA) and a functional assay (serotonin-release assay) in patients clinically suspected of having HIT.

Polymorphisms in TNFA and CTLA-4 Genes and the Risk of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3414-3414
Author(s):  
Dorothee Leroux ◽  
Claire Pouplard ◽  
Benoit Guillet ◽  
Beatrice Cosne ◽  
Marc Antoine May ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Rflp Analysis ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
High Doses

Abstract Backgroud and objectives: The formation of antibodies (Abs) to heparin platelet factor 4 complexes (H/PF4) associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a T-helper cell dependent event that involves antigen presenting cells (APC) and B-lymphocytes. Polymorphisms of the CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4) gene have been described as a risk factor in several autoimmune diseases. In addition, TNFα is a major inflammatory cytokine with potent regulatory functions and polymorphisms in TNFA have also been associated with autoimmune antibody-mediated diseases. We therefore evaluated the possibility that an association between polymorphisms in CTLA-4 (−318 C/T and +49 A/G) or TNFA (−308 G/A) and the development of Abs to H/PF4 and HIT might exist. Methods: Eighty-three patients identified as having developed definite HIT with significant levels of Abs to PVS/PF4 in ELISA (HAT 45, GTI, Brookfield, WI, USA) and positive serotonin release assay were studied (HIT group). Two control groups were studied: the Abneg group consisted of 83 patients who had undergone heart surgery with high doses of unfractionated heparin administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and who were tested negative for Abs to PVS/PF4 at the 8th post operative day. The Abpos group consisted of 58 patients who had also undergone CPB but had developed high levels of Abs to PVS/PF4 without significant change in the platelet count post-operatively. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), one in TNFA (−308G/A) and two in CTLA-4 (−318 C/T and +49A/G) were studied by conventional RFLP analysis as described (Astermark et al, Blood 2006 and Astermark et al, Thromb Haemost 2007). Results: The CTLA-4 +49 A/G and −318 C/T genotypes and allele distributions were similar in the 3 groups of patients (Table). In contrast, the frequency of TNFA –308 G/G homozygotes was higher in the HIT group compared to patients without HIT whether they had developed PF4-specific Abs or not (p=0.035). Therefore, the A allele was less frequent in HIT patients (p=0.026, OR 0.49; CI95% 0.26–0.93) but there was no significant difference when comparing patients with and without PF4-dependent antibodies. Genotype Allele frequency Ab neg (n = 82) Ab pos (n = 58) HIT (n = 82) CTLA-4(+49) A/A 31 (38%) 24 (41%) 35 (43%) A/G 40 (49%) 26 (45%) 41 (50%) G/G 11 (13%) 8 (14%) 6 (7%) CTLA-4(−318) C/C 63 (77%) 49 (84%) 67 (82%) C/T 19 (23%) 9 (16%) 17 (21%) T/T 0 0 0 (0%) TNFα(−308) G/G 59 (72%) 41 (71%) 68 (84%) G/A 20 (24%) 15 (26%) 12 (15%) A/A 3 (4%) 2 (3%) 1 (1%) A Allele 0.160 0.160 0.09 G Allele 0.840 0.840 0.910 Conclusion: The TNFA –308 A allele appears to be protective regarding the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients having developed PF4-specific antibodies. A similar effect has been suggested in immune thrombocytopenic purpura (Foster et al, Brit J Haematol 2001) despite individuals with this allele have been identified as high TNFα producers. Therefore, the mechanisms involved for explaining this apparent protective effect of the TNFA −308A allele in patients at risk for HIT have to be identified.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document