Fractionated ICE with Rituximab Is Safe and Effective for Relapse/Refractory DLBCL Patients with Severe Comorbidities

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2713-2713
Author(s):  
Norina Tanaka ◽  
Yoichi Imai ◽  
Aya Watanabe ◽  
Kenjiro Mitsuhashi ◽  
Kentaro Yoshinaga ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although many salvage regimens have been used in patients with relapse or refractory lymphoma, these have limitations in elderly or patients with complications due to toxicity and restricted tolerability. In particular, the treatment strategy for patients with severe comorbidity remains to be determined. The combination of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) has been used for relapse and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma since the 1990s. Ifosfamide, an alkylating agent, is a key drug in the ICE regimen, which is non-cross resistant with cyclophosphamide. In practice, there are various regimens of ICE treatment. The outpatient-based fractionated regimen of ICE (fractionated ICE) described in 2003 by Herzberg et al involves a different method of ifosfamide-administration from that originally described. Although ifosfamide 5000 mg/m2 is continuously infused for 24 h according to the original ICE regimen, it is infused in three equally divided doses over 2 h on days 1-3 of each cycle in the fractionated ICE regimen. Unlike the original ICE regimen, the modified regimen can be performed in outpatient clinics. The efficacy and tolerability of fractionated ICE as both a salvage and stem cell mobilization regimen have been confirmed in relapse/refractory patients. Many studies have reported the efficacy of the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients (DLBCL). However, no study has reported the efficacy of rituximab addition to the fractionated ICE regimen. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and toxicity of fractionated ICE with rituximab (fractionated R-ICE) as a salvage regimen in relapse/refractory DLBCL patients (Table 1). Further, we compared the response and survival rate after fractionated R-ICE between patients with severe comorbidity and other patients. Method: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 66 patients with relapse or refractory DLBCL diagnosed between 2000 and 2014. Comorbidities were evaluated using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria were used to define toxicities. Result: Among the 66 patients, 55 received salvage therapies, 30 received fractionated R-ICE, and 25 received it as a second-line salvage therapy. Efficacy and toxicity is demonstrated in Table 2. The overall response rate (ORR) to fractionated R-ICE was 46.7% (n=14) (complete response [CR], 26.7% [n=8], partial response, 20% [n=6]); 1 year survival rate after relapse was 56.7%, and the duration of 50% survival after relapse was 2.4 years. During the cycles, myelosuppression was the most serious toxicity, followed by grade 4 hematological adverse events were 18 (60%) patients, respectively. A previous study showed poor prognosis in patients with high CCIs before the first R-CHOP treatment. In our study, the ratio of patients with chemotherapy dose reduction less than 30% was comparable between low (0 or 1) and high (≥2) CCIs estimated before the fractionated R-ICE therapy. There was no significant difference of survival duration after relapse between low and high CCI (Figure 1). The items used for estimating CCI such as diabetes (n=5), heart disease (n=4), tumor (n=4), and collagen disease (n=3) did not affect survival. Conclusion: Although patients in our study were old (median: 71 y, range 50-85 y), the CR rate was similar to that of previous studies involving ICE therapy (CR rate 12.5-37%) or R-ICE therapy (CR rate 25-53%). Our results suggest that comorbidities do not have significant impact on the outcome of patients with relapse or refractory DLBCL treated with fractionated R-ICE. Although myelosuppression was severe in patients with high CCI scores, there was no increased incidence of infection or other adverse events. Fractionated R-ICE is supposed to be useful as a salvage therapy, which can be performed in outpatient clinics for relapse/refractory DLBCL patients including those who were older or having high CCI scores. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 95-95
Author(s):  
Benjamin Babic ◽  
Florian Matthias Corvinus ◽  
Edin Hadjijusufovic ◽  
Evangelos Tagkalos ◽  
Hauke Lang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The incidence of gastric cancer decreases in the western world, however, it remains one of the most common diseases (1). There is just little data from Europe comparing the outcome of young and elderly gastric cancer patients. This study compares, depending on the age of 266 patients, the outcome of 266 consecutive gastrectomy cases due to gastric cancer Methods 266 consecutive patients with gastric cancer received a gastrectomy between 2008–2016 at our comprehensive cancer centre. The mean age of the patients in this study was 64 years old (21- 93 years). All patients were followed up regarding survival. The patients were separated in 6 different groups, depending on the age at the time of operation. The different groups were re-analysed and compared to each other regarding median and 5-year survival. Results In this collective the 5-year survival rate for all patients was 43%. There were more diffuse type adenocarcinomas in Patients < 40 years. In younger patients the tumour was staged in an advanced stadium compared to the elderly patients group. There is a significantly higher 5-year survival rate for younger patients after gastrectomy. There is no significant difference, when separating patient groups in to decades of age. Conclusion Young patients have a higher 5-year survival rate after gastrectomy compared to old patients. However, comparing patients from chronologic age in decades, the significance is not reproducible. Therefore gastrectomy or subtotal gastrectomy is the determining therapeutic approach for gastric cancer with an acceptable outcome in both young and elderly patients. Older patients might have an lower 5 year survival rate not only due to the cancer or the surgical therapy itself, it is related to comorbidities and a lower rate in neoadjuvant therapy as well Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4891-4891
Author(s):  
Jungmin Jo ◽  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Yongchel Ahn ◽  
Seong Joon Park ◽  
Shin Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4891 Background CD20 is a non-glycosylated phosphoprotein expressed on the surface of all mature B-cells. CD20 is expressed on all stages of B cell development except the first and last. However, complete lack of CD20 expression occurred in a few cases without previous rituximab (R-) treatment. The immunohistochemostry (IHC) studies which we used were not perfect for confirmation of expression. However, we intended to investigate characteristics and clinical outcome of CD20-negative diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not detected with usual method, and to compare with CD20-positive. Methods The records of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma patient registry were reviewed in Asan Medical Center. Between September 2003 and February 2009, a total of 407 patients were diagnosed DLBCL and 16 patients (3.9%) out of 407 confirmed CD20-negative DLBCL by IHC. The rest of patients (n=391) were CD20-positive and unconfirmed cases were excluded. Retrospective analysis of complete response (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) was performed. Results The median age was 60.5 years old (range 31–81) in CD20-negative patients. Ten patients were males. The Ann Arbor stage was I in 3 patients, II in 3 patients, and III or IV in 10. Six patients were low risk group, 7 patients in intermediate, and 3 in high risk group according to international prognostic index (IPI). Most of patients (62.5%) received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristin, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy in CD20-negative and 295 patients (75.4%) with R-CHOP in CD20-positive DLBCL. The Baseline characteristics was not different in both groups except Hans classifier (p=0.02). With a median follow-up time of 32.3 months (range 0.5–83.4), the CR rate was 73.5%, the 3-year OS was 69.5%, and 3-year DFS 74.2% in all patients. CD20-positive and CD20 negative groups had a CR rate of 73.7%, 68.8% (p=0.146), respectively, a 3-year OS of 70.7%, 40.0% (p=0.003), a 3-year DFS of 75.4%, 44.6% (p< 0.001), respectively. The 3-year OS and DFS also had significant difference with adjusted IPI (p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions CD20-negaive DLBLC was not infrequently with usual IHC method (around 4%). The survival outcome was poor compared with CD20-positive DLBLC because of high relapse rate. It was caused without rituximab treatment in CD20-negative. Development of novel target agents like rituximab should be explored to improve outcome and maintain the CR status of CD20-negative DLBCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5369-5369
Author(s):  
Khalid Nasser Al Hashmi ◽  
Kamla Alwahaibi ◽  
Murtadha K. Al-Khabori

Abstract Background and Objectives Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is a B cell lymphoma characterized by the presence of Reed-Sternberg cells. HL comprises 1% of all cancer cases and 14% of all lymphoma cases. The clinical presentation and survival rate of these patients have not been described in Oman. We, therefore, aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and survival rate of patients with classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. Methods This is a retrospective study that was conducted in a tertiary care centers in the Sultanate of Oman. All Omani adults with histopathological confirmed diagnosis of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma from 2000 to 2016 were included in this study. The demographic, clinical, and survival rate were recorded and analyzed. Results A total of 273 patients (45 % females and 55% males, mean age 32) fulfilled the inclusion criteria with histopathological confirmed diagnosis of classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. The commonest presenting feature was lymph node enlargement (83%); followed by fever (48%). The most common classical HL histological subtype was nodular sclerosing HL (NSHL) (71%). The most common stage was II 34%. The most common chemotherapy regimen used as the first line was doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) (89%). Five and 10-year survival rates were 93.8 % and 99.2%, respectively. Conclusions This is the first study that demonstrates the demographic, clinical and survival rate of HL patients in Oman, and provides a general picture of the HL patients in our country. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5078-5078
Author(s):  
Tomoo Osumi ◽  
Tetsuya Mori ◽  
Naoto Fujita ◽  
Akiko M. Saito ◽  
Atsuko Nakazawa ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Relapsed or refractory pediatric B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) has been reported to be extremely difficult to cure. We previously conducted a retrospective study of pediatric relapsed or refractory B-NHL in Japan between 1996 and 2004 and found that the four-year overall survival rate was only 20.5% (Fujita N. e al. PBC. 2008). Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is expected to be effective in improving the prognosis of pediatric relapsed or refractory B-NHL and was approved for use in 2003 in Japan. Here, we retrospectively assessed the treatment and prognosis of pediatric relapsed or refractory pediatric B-NHL in the rituximab era in Japan. Methods We collected relapsed pediatric B-NHL cases from patients enrolled in our current study, JPLSG B-NHL03 study, which was the first nationwide multicenter trial for newly diagnosed pediatric B-NHL. We collected information on treatment and outcome after induction failure or relapse. Results In 33 patients enrolled this study, the median age at diagnosis was 9.7 years and male predominance was observed. Nine cases were pathologically subclassified initially as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 11 as Burkitt lymphoma, 11 as Burkitt Leukemia and two as others. According to initial Murphy staging, most cases were in the advanced stage. The most common site of relapse was abdomen (8 cases), followed by bone marrow (8 cases) and central nervous system (7 cases). Twenty-three cases relapsed in one site while 10 did so in multiple sites. Among them, 20 relapsed within six months after initial diagnosis. Among them, 28 patients received some rituximab combined treatment as salvage therapy. R-ICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide) regimen was the most popular and used in 22 patients as first-line salvage therapy. As a result, 22 patients (66.7%) achieved complete remission (CR) by some salvage therapy. 23 received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Their 5-year overall survival rate was 48.5%, which was far more superior to both our previous study (Figure 1) and another on relapsed or refractory B-NHL in childhood. In risk factor analysis for survival, rituximab combined treatment and HSCT did not influence the outcome, but achievement of CR after salvage treatment resulted in significantly better survival (68.2% vs 9.1%, p=0.001). These results suggest that the advent of rituximab induced an improvement of CR rate for relapsed paediatric B-NHL, which resulted in an improvement of the survival rate. Conclusion In conclusion, the prognosis of the pediatric relapsed or refractory B-NHL in a Japanese cohort remained poor but is showing improvement in the rituximab era. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1169-1176 ◽  
Author(s):  
W S Velasquez ◽  
P McLaughlin ◽  
S Tucker ◽  
F B Hagemeister ◽  
F Swan ◽  
...  

PURPOSE This study attempted to determine the efficacy of the combination of etoposide (VP-16), methyl-prednisolone, and cytarabine (Ara-C) with or without cisplatin in relapsing and refractory adult lymphoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The first 63 patients were randomized to receive VP-16 40 mg/m2/d for 4 days, methylprednisolone 500 mg intravenously daily for 5 days, and Ara-C 2 g/m2 intravenously over 2 to 3 hours on day 5 with or without cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV administered by 24-hour infusion for 4 days (ESHA +/- P). Markedly different responses between ESHA (33%) and ESHAP (75%) led to deletion of the ESHA arm. A total of 122 patients on the ESHAP regimen were studied. RESULTS Forty-five patients (37%) attained a complete remission (CR) and 33 (27%) attained a partial remission (PR), for a total response rate of 64%. The median duration of CR was 20 months, with 28% of remitters still in CR at 3 years. The overall median survival duration was 14 months; the survival rate at 3 years was 31%. Overall time to treatment failure (TTF) showed 10% of all patients to be alive and disease-free at 40 months. Response and survival rates were similar in patients with low-grade (n = 34), intermediate-grade (n = 67), transformed (n = 18), and high-grade (n = 3) lymphoma. The most significant factors for response and survival by multivariate analysis were the serum lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) level, tumor burden, and age (when analyzed as a continuous variable), while prior CR was highly significant by univariate analysis. A significant difference in survival was noted for patients with normal LDH levels and low- or intermediate-tumor burden or patients with low tumor burden and elevated LDH levels (55% 3-year survival rate) versus patients with elevated LDH levels and intermediate or high tumor burden (< 20%). Major toxicities included myelosuppression, with a median granulocyte count of 500/microL and platelet count of 70,000/microL. CONCLUSION ESHAP was found to be an active, tolerable chemotherapy regimen for relapsing and refractory lymphoma. Applying a prognostic model based on tumor burden and serum LDH level shows significant differences in survival in this patient population.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3110-3110
Author(s):  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Thomas Prebet ◽  
Arnaud Pigneux ◽  
Mathilde Hunault ◽  
Jacques Delaunay ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3110 Poster Board III-47 The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the NPM1/FLT3-ITD status on outcome in relapsed/refractory AML patients with normal karyotype who received a salvage regimen using GO as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. For this purpose, we analyzed the outcome of 57 AML patients with normal karyotype treated between 2001 and 2009. Patients received GO as monotherapy or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents at time of relapse (n=36) or in the setting of refractory disease (n=21). There were 26 males and 31 females with a median age of 52 (range, 20-70) years at time of leukemia diagnosis. The FAB distribution included 2, 13, 15, 11, 12 and 1 AML cases from the M0, M1, M2, M4, M5 and M6 subgroups, respectively. Three cases were considered as unclassified. In addition, 5 patients had secondary AML. All patients were CD33 positive with a median CD33 expression level of 98%. As salvage treatment, 46 patients received the MIDAM regimen (GO: 9 mg/m2 at day 4 + Cytarabine 1g/m2/12 hours day 1-5 + Mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2/day day 1-3).3 In 2 patients receiving the MIDAM regimen, Mitoxantrone was omitted to avoid cardiac toxicity. Four patients received GO as monotherapy at 9 mg/m2 (n=3) or at 6 mg/m2 (n=1). The 5 remaining patients received GO 3 to 9 mg/m2 combined with other chemotherapeutic agents (Cytarabine + VP16 + GO, n=2; Cytarabine + Idarubicine + GO, n=2; Cytarabine + Amsacrine + GO, n=1). After salvage therapy, 25 patients could proceed and receive consolidation with an allogeneic stem cell transplant. In this series, all patients could be screened in the blood or bone marrow for mutations in the NPM1 and in the FLT3 gene (ITD mutations) at diagnosis. Numbers of patients according to NPM1/FLT3-ITD status were as follow: (+/−): n=14, (+/+): n=9, (−/−): n=19, (−/+): n=15. The same proportion of refractory patients was observed in the favourable NPM1+/FLT3-ITD- sub-group as compared to the other sub-groups (36%, n=5/14 vs 37%, n=16/43). With a median follow-up of 23.3 (range, 2.3-94.5) months for surviving patients, OS was 46.5% (95%CI, 33.6-59.9%) at 2 years. CR, relapse and death rates according to NPM1/FLT3-ITD status were as follow: CR: (+/−): 85%, (+/+): 66%, (−/−): 47%, (−/+): 73%, P=NS; Relapses: (+/−): 33%, (+/+): 33%, (−/−): 33%, (−/+): 54%, P=NS; Deaths: (+/−): 28%, (+/+): 78%, (−/−): 58%, (−/+): 66%, P=0.02 Also, the death rate was significantly lower in FLT3-ITD- patients as compared to FLT3-ITD+ cases (45% vs. 71%, P=0.05). OS was significantly higher in the NPM1+/FLT3-ITD- sub-group as compared to other patients (78% vs. 36% at 2 years, P=0.026). In conclusion, and although this needs to be confirmed in a prospective setting, refractory/relapsed AML patients combining a normal karyotype and a NPM1+/FLT3-ITD- molecular status are likely to remain in a “favorable prognosis” category when receiving salvage therapy. Such information is of major interest for patients counselling and for the design of salvage therapy approaches. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2722-2722
Author(s):  
Fabienne McClanahan ◽  
Thomas Hielscher ◽  
Michael Rieger ◽  
Manfred Hensel ◽  
Kai Neben ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2722 Poster Board II-698 Background: As the clinical management of patients with bulky disease remains challenging, many centres apply involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) after completion of immunochemotherapy. This strategy remains controversial. Patients and Methods: To evaluate the benefit of consolidating IF-RT in addition to immunochemotherapy, we retrospectively analyzed relapse patterns and survival of patients presenting with bulky follicular lymphoma (FL). Bulky disease was defined as abdominal/ mediastinal lymphoma mass >7.5 cm and/ or peripheral lymphoma mass >5 cm. All patients were treated within a prospective randomized trial on 126 patients with FL with six cycles of standard CHOP-chemotherapy in combination with 1, 3 or 6 cycles of Rituximab, followed by consolidating IF-RT in patients with bulky disease. 42 eligible patients with bulky disease were identified and form the foundation of this analysis, of which 26 were irradiated and 16 were not, violating the protocol. Results: With the exception of number of affected nodal regions, there was no significant difference between the irradiated and the non-irradiated group with regards to presenting characteristics (p > .05). Among all patients, bulks were located below the diaphragm in 91%. A second tumour bulk was present in 9 patients (22%). Female to male ratio was 1.3:1, and the median age at diagnosis was 54 years (range 23–73). According to FLIPI, 10% were classified as low risk (0–1), 45% as intermediate risk (2), and 45% as high risk (3–5). B symptoms were absent in 69%. Eleven patients (26 %) had received one course of Rituximab, 17 (41%) three courses and 14 (33%) six courses. There was no significant difference between the irradiated and the non-irradiated group with regards to previous exposure to immunochemotherapy (p = .628). After a median follow-up of 60 months, a total of 21 patients (50%) had progressed or relapsed and 9 patients (21%) had died. With the exception of one patient who died from congestive heart failure following chemotherapy-related cardiomyopathy, the main cause of death was disease progression or relapse. Highly malignant transformation into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was observed in 5 cases. In the irradiated group, relapse occurred in 12 of 26 patients. Half of these relapses were located within the original bulk or within the bulk plus a new location, and 50% at a new location altogether; 42% occurred within the previously irradiated area. In the non-irradiated group, 9 of 16 patients relapsed. The corresponding rates regarding relapse location were 67% for original plus new location and 33% for new location only. There was no statistically significant difference between exposure to radiotherapy after immunochemotherapy and the likelihood of a relapse per se (p = .751) or at a specific location (p = .66). At the last follow-up, 31% of irradiated patients had achieved CR and 23% PR. Among the non-irradiated group, the corresponding rates were 25% and 19%. There was no significant difference in remission rates at any staging examination throughout the clinical trial between the two treatment groups (p > .05). 6-year progression-free- and overall survival rates were 52% and 80% after IF-RT and 48% and 73% without IF-RT (p = 1.00, p = .68 respectively). Conclusion: In this analysis, there was no difference in relapse rate, relapse location, PFS and OS between patients with bulky FL treated with and without consolidating IF-RT. Although patient numbers are limited, this is the first analysis of its kind conducted in the Rituximab era. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1759-1759
Author(s):  
Katsuhiro Miura ◽  
Kazuhiro Takei ◽  
Sumiko Kobayashi ◽  
Yujin Kobayashi ◽  
Toshitake Tanaka ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1759 Background The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma after the conventional first line chemotherapy is still disappointing. Although several rituximab combined salvage regimens were reported, the optimal treatment has not yet been established. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a non-anthracycline based salvage regimen, consisting of rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide, cytarabine and dexamethasone (R-IVAD) in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Patients and methods Patients with relapsed or refractory CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL G3) were consecutively enrolled in this treatment. R-IVAD consisted of rituximab (375 mg/m2 on day -2), ifosfamide (1500 mg/m2 on day 1–5), etoposide (150 mg/m2 on day 1–3), cytarabine (100 mg/m2 on day 1–3) and dexamethasone (40 mg/body on day 1–3). Treatment was given every 3 weeks up to a total of 3 courses with support of granulocyte colony stimulating factor. For responders under 65 years old with good performance status (PS), we planed peripheral stem cell collection after the third cycle of R-IVAD and consolidating high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with cycrophosphamide (60 mg/kg on day -7,-6), etoposide (500 mg/m2 on day -6, -5, -4) and ranimustine (250 mg/m2 on day -3, -2) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Results Thirty-two patients (25 DLBCL and 7 FL G3) with a median age of 64 years old (range 38–79) participated in this study and received an average of 2.6 cycles of R-IVAD. There were 21 relapsed and 11 primary refractory patients. The overall response (OR) and the complete response (CR) rate were 72% and 56% respectively. The OR rate of relapsed patients was significantly higher than that of primary refractory patients (86% vs. 45%, p=0.035). With a median 16 months (range 2–99) of follow up, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and the event-free survival (EFS) for all patients were 55% and 36% respectively. Of the 11 eligible patients, 10 successfully proceeded to HDC/ASCT with an average of 5.5 × 106/kg of harvested CD34-positive cells, resulting in the 2-year OS of 90%. No treatment related death was observed during the investigation. Multivariate analysis revealed that the age > 60 years, PS ≥ 2, extranodal sites ≥ 2, and primary refractory disease were independently associated with worse survival. Conclusion R-IVAD regimen, which efficiently mobilizes peripheral stem cells, is a safe and efficacious alternative for patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1627-1627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho Sup Lee ◽  
Lee Chun Park ◽  
Eun Mi Lee ◽  
Seong Hoon Shin ◽  
Byeong Jin Ye ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1627 Abstract Background: Gastrointestinal tract is the most commonly involved extranodal site and is represented 10–15% of all non-Hodgkin¡&hibar;s lymphoma (NHL) cases and 30–40% of all extranodal sites. In this retrospective studies, the purpose is finding appropriate treatment strategy according to comparing the efficacy of treatment in patients with primary intestinal diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBL) undergoing surgery followed chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Method: Seventy six patients were newly diagnosed with DLBL and received chemotherapy between March 2004 and June 2011. Primary intestinal lymphoma which had predominant intestinal lesions was diagnosed by specialized hemato-oncologist. All patients were treated with rituximab combined cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP). Patients were divided into two groups. One included patients who were undertaken surgery followed by R-CHOP (surgery group). The other included patients who were undertaken R-CHOP alone (CT group). Results: The characteristics of the patients were as follows: the median age was 56.5 years (range 15–85 years) with a female-to-male ratio of 45: 31. Patients characteristics had no significant difference between two groups. The estimated 3 years progrression free survival rates (PFS) and overall survival rates (OS) of surgery and CT group were 92.2% and 74.8%, (p=0.009) and 94.2% and 80.7%, (p=0.049) respectively. In univariate analysis, PFS and OS were estimated in Lugano stage I, II1 and II2, IIE (p=0.006 and p=0.036), Low, Low-intermediate, and high-intermediate risk (p=0.004 and p=0.000), and surgery and CT alone, (p=0.009 and p=0.049), respectively. In multivariate analysis, there was no independent predictive factors for survival. Conclusion: Patients treated with surgery followed by R-CHOP were seemed to have higher survival rate than R-CHOP alone although there was no significant differences for survival rate. There was no significant prognostic factors for survival but there were possible prognostic factors such as Lugano stage, IPI risk, and treatment modality for PFS and OS. Figure. The superior survival rates were shown in surgery group than those in R-CHOP chemotherapy group. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4241-4241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiko Ono ◽  
Hideki Tsujimura ◽  
Satoshi Maruyama ◽  
Akiyasu Satou ◽  
Takeaki Sugawara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of lymphoma, mainly affecting elderly population. Treatment of elderly patients is challenging, and many clinical trials have been conducted to identify the optimal strategy. While rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) therapy is considered as the standard, elderly patients are often frail and sometimes unable to tolerate the standard dose of CHOP therapy. In our institution, 5/6 (83%) and 7/12 (58%) doses of standard CHOP have been administered for patients aged 65-79 years and aged 80 or older, respectively. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of our reduced-dose R-CHOP therapy, we conducted a retrospective analysis of 100 patients with median age of 74 (65-86) years and presented the results in ASH 2016 meeting (Ono et al., abstract #4211). The outcome was quite satisfactory. In summary, the overall response rate (ORR) was 93%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 81%. Three-year overall survival (3-yr OS) was 78%. These results seem to be better than the outcome of LNH-98.5 trial (median age 69 years, ORR 83%, CR 75%, 2-yr OS 70%, Coiffier et al., NEJM 2002) and LNH03-6B trial (median age 70 years, ORR 86%, CR 74%, 3-yr OS 72%, Delarue et al., Lancet Oncol 2013), in which 8 cycles of standard-dose R-CHOP were scheduled for patients older than 60 years. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between our data and those big trials. To find out factors that could play an important role in achieving this favorable outcome, we performed an additional analysis of our data. Methods: We applied the same database that we previously analyzed for ASH 2016. This database included clinical information of 100 patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed DLBCL, who underwent R-CHOP therapy from August 2010 to December 2013 in our institution. We calculated relative dose intensity (RDI) from the doses of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin and the intervals between each course compared with the standard dose (750 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide and 50 mg/m2 doxorubicin every 21 days). Comorbid conditions were classified by Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). We also analyzed time from diagnosis to initiation of chemotherapy (diagnosis to treatment interval; DTI) in 81 patients. Results: As previously reported, 14 patients were very elderly (≥80 years old) and 57 and 5 patients had an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score of at least 3 and CCI score of at least 3, respectively. Scheduled cycles of R-CHOP were completed in 87 patients and the median RDI was 0.81 in patients aged 65-79 years and 0.58 in patients aged 80 or older. Reduced-dose R-CHOP described above was completed as planned in most of patients. Survival predictors were analyzed using univariate analysis followed by Cox regression model. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age and RDI had no significant impact on OS. Instead, the independent factors negatively impacting on OS were IPI score ≥3 (p &lt; 0.001), CCI score ≥3 (p = 0.03), incidence of febrile neutropenia (p = 0.04) and not completing the scheduled cycles of R-CHOP (p = 0.001). The median DTI was 17 days. Patients with higher IPI score tended to receive chemotherapy immediately after diagnosis (p = 0.002). Patients with delay in therapy (DTI ≥17 days) had a better outcome (2-year OS was 97% vs. 72%, p = 0.02). Conclusion: In general, older age and low RDI are accepted as the negative prognostic factors. However, they had no impact on OS in this study. The current findings suggest that the completion of 6 or more cycles of R-CHOP plays an important role in achieving a better outcome even when the dose of CHOP is reduced. Although full-dose R-CHOP is still golden standard in the treatment of DLBCL, the appropriate dose reduction can be considered for older and frail patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document