scholarly journals Updated Clinical Activity of Graspa Versus Native l-Asparaginase in Combination with Cooprall Regimen in Phase 3 Randomized Trial in Patients with Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (NCT01518517)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3723-3723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Baruchel ◽  
Yves Bertrand ◽  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Nicolas Blin ◽  
Emmanuelle Tavernier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Asparaginase is a cornerstone in the treatment of ALL, but its utility is limited by toxicities including hypersensitivity. Clinical allergy is associated with inactivation of asparaginase by antibodies, which can also neutralize asparaginase without any clinical signs of hypersensitivity (silent inactivation). GRASPA (proposed eryaspase, E-Coli L-Asparaginase encapsulated into red blood cells) improves pharmacokinetics, tolerability and maintain circulating asparaginase (ASPA) activity due to the protective barrier of the erythrocyte membrane. In a recent Phase III trial, it has shown to prolong the asparaginase activity and significantly reduce the incidence of allergic reactions in pts with relapsed ALL. In the non-allergic pts, GRASPA significantly reduced the incidence of hypersensitivity (0% vs 46%; p<0.001). ASPA activity >100 IU/l was 21 ± 5 vs 9 ± 7 days in GRASPA and L-ASP, respectively (p<0.001). Methods This open, randomized international Phase 3 study enrolled pts with relapsed ALL. The co-primary endpoints were the duration of ASPA activity > 100IU/L and the incidence of hypersensitivity during induction. Key secondary endpoints were complete remission, minimal residual disease, relapse rate, event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Pts (n=80), aged 1-55 years without prior hypersensitivity were randomized to GRASPA (150 IU/kg, n=26, Arm A) or native L-asparaginase (L-ASP, 10,000 IU/m², n= 28, Arm B). Additionally, 26 pts with prior hypersensitivity were treated with GRASPA in a single stratum (Arm C). All pts received COOPRALL protocol as a backbone chemotherapy. Results A total of 80 pts with relapsed and or refractory ALL were enrolled into the trial. There were a greater proportion of pts who completed the induction treatment in GRASPA arm (65%) than in the L-ASP arm (46%). The main reasons for treatment discontinuation were: target levels of asparagine depletion not reached (64%) in GRASPA arm, and adverse events (58%) in the L-ASP arm. In addition, in the L-ASP arm, 5 (19%) pts prematurely discontinued treatment due to disease progression. As of the cut-off date (28th August 2014), the majority of pts (63%) still continued in the study and followed-up for survival. The relapse rate at 6 and 12 mo was low, and accounted for 3 (13%; 95% CI: 2.6; 32.4) and 5 (26%; 95% CI: 9.1; 51.2) in the GRASPA arm, compared to 1 pt (5%) and 3 (17%; 95% CI: 3.6; 41.4) in the L-ASP arm, respectively. Except for L-ASP, and adult patients, the median EFS and OS were not reached for GRASPA in the entire set or in children, either at 12 months. Overall, there was a trend across all groups with lower EFS and OS event rates with GRASPA compared to L-ASP, as presented in table below. The 2-year follow up will be additionally provided at the meeting Table 1. GRASPA vs L-ASP All patients GRASPA = 26 L-ASP = 28 Children GRASPA = 21 L-ASP = 21 Adults GRASPA = 5 L-ASP = 7 12 mo EFS Median (mo) NR vs 11.6 NR 4.6 vs 1.6 Events 30.8% vs 50.0% 19.1% vs 38.1% 80% vs 85.7% HR 0.54 0.47 0.69 95% CI 0.23; 1.26 0.15; 1.47 0.20; 2.44 P Value* 0.153 0.196 0.569 12 mo OS Median (mo) NR NR 10 vs 8.2 Events 23.1% vs 32.1% 4.8% vs 14.3% 20% vs 42.8% HR 0.63 0.34 0.39 95% CI 023; 1.74 0.05; 2.42 0.05; 2.81 P Value* 0.377 0.424 0.705 *P value in all subsets is not statistically significant Conclusion GRASPA has demonstrated both safety and activity in pts with relapsed ALL, and provides an alternative treatment option for those patients. Disclosures Bertrand: ERYTECH Pharma: Consultancy. Thomas:ERYTECH Pharma: Consultancy. Vey:Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Bonin:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment. El Hariry:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2492-2492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Yves Bertrand ◽  
Andre Baruchel ◽  
Nicolas Blin ◽  
Emmanuelle Tavernier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Asparaginase is a cornerstone in the treatment of ALL, but its utility is limited by toxicities including hypersensitivity. Clinical allergy is associated with inactivation of asparaginase by antibodies, which can also neutralize asparaginase without any clinical signs of hypersensitivity (silent inactivation). GRASPA (eryaspase - proposed INN) is an L-asparaginase encapsulated into the red blood cells. In a recent Phase III trial, it has shown to prolong the asparaginase activity and significantly reduce the incidence of allergic reactions in pts with relapsed ALL. Methods This open, randomized international Phase 3 study enrolled pts with relapsed ALL. The co-primary endpoints were the mean duration of asparaginase (ASPA) activity > 100 IU/L and incidence of hypersensitivity reactions during induction phase. Key secondary endpoints were safety, tolerability, complete remission and minimal residual disease rate, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and anti-ASPA antibodies at baseline. Pts (n=80), aged 1-55 years without prior hypersensitivity were randomized to GRASPA (150 IU/kg, n=26, Arm A) or native L-asparaginase (L-ASP, 10,000 IU/m², n= 28, Arm B). Additionally, 26 pts with prior hypersensitivity were treated with GRASPA in a single stratum (Arm C, GRASPA-s). All pts received COOPRALL protocol as a backbone chemotherapy. Here we report the report the PK of asparaginase activity, and PD effects. Results A total of 80 pts enrolled into the trial. A total 100% and 96% of patients had at least one day with asparaginase level >100 IU/L during induction, with GRASPA and L-ASP, respectively. Only one patient in L-Asp group did not reach this threshold. All patients in Arm C have also achieved total blood asparaginase level > 100 IU/L during induction. Prolonged ASPA activity was maintained across several key subpopulations as follows: Table 1. GRASPA L-ASP GRASPA L-ASP Age group Children Adults  N 21 21 5 7  Mean (SD) 20.8 (5.3) 11.4 (7.3) 19.3 (5.5) 3.2 (2.8)  Median 22.0 8.3 22.1 2.3 Risk Score S1/S2 S3/S4  N 16 15 10 13  Mean (SD) 20.2 (6.0) 12.0 (8.6) 20.9 (3.9) 6.3 (4.4)  Median 22.4 9.0 22.0 6.2 F1-F2/VANDA F1-F2 VANDA  N 16 15 10 13  Mean (SD) 19.5 ± 6.5 11.5 (9.0) 22.0 (0.2) 6.9 (4.2)  Median 22.9 8.8 22.0 6.9 The total ASPA activity >100 IU/L until the loss of that activity demonstrated that the activity was retained in the majority of pts in the GRASPA arm (89%) compared to only 26% in the L-ASP arm. The median times from first assessment of activity > 100 IU/L to loss of activity was not reached in the GRASPA arm by Day 28, but was 15 days in the L-ASP arm. The difference was statistically significant (table below). Similar trend was also observed with GRASPA-s. Table 2. Time from first assessment showing ASPA activity > 100 IU/L until loss of ASPA activity > 100 IU/L Number (%) of events Median [95% CI] Hazard ratio 95% CI Logrank test: p-value for superiority L-ASPN= 28 27 (96.4) 15[11; 21] 0.14 0.07, 0.28 <0.001 GRASPAN= 26 26 (100) NR* NR: not reached Additional information correlating ASPA with asparagine depletion and other amino acid changes (aspartate, glutamic acid, and glutamate) will be provided at the meeting. Conclusion GRASPA consistently demonstrated activity compared to L-ASP for the treatment of pts with relapsed ALL, and is therefore a suitable option for patients with relapsed ALL. Disclosures Thomas: ERYTECH Pharma: Consultancy. Bertrand:ERYTECH Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vey:Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Bonin:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment. Godfrin:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment. El Hariry:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3734-3734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Bertrand ◽  
Andre Baruchel ◽  
Xavier Thomas ◽  
Nicolas Blin ◽  
Emmanuelle Tavernier ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Asparaginase is a cornerstone in the treatment of ALL, but its utility is limited by toxicities including hypersensitivity. Clinical allergy is associated with inactivation of asparaginase by antibodies, which can also neutralize asparaginase without any clinical signs of hypersensitivity (silent inactivation). GRASPA (eryaspase - proposed INN) is an L-asparaginase encapsulated into the red blood cells. In a recent Phase III trial, it has shown to prolong the asparaginase activity and significantly reduce the incidence of allergic reactions in pts with relapsed ALL. Methods This open, randomized international Phase 3 study enrolled pts with relapsed ALL. The co-primary endpoints were the mean duration of asparaginase (ASPA) activity > 100 IU/L and incidence of hypersensitivity reactions during induction phase. Key secondary endpoints were safety, tolerability, complete remission and minimal residual disease rate, PK, and anti-ASPA antibodies (A-Abs) at baseline. Pts (n=80), aged 1-55 years without prior hypersensitivity were randomized to GRASPA (150 IU/kg, n=26, Arm A) or native L-asparaginase (L-ASP, 10,000 IU/m², n=28, Arm B). Additionally, 26 pts with prior hypersensitivity were treated with GRASPA in a single stratum (Arm C). All pts received COOPRALL protocol as a backbone chemotherapy. Here we report the impact of A-Abs on safety and efficacy of GRASPA. Assessments were performed at Day 4, 13, 18, and 27 (F1/F2 block), Day 6, 15, and 27 (VANDA block), and Day 6, 12 (R2/R1 block). Results At baseline, 23%, 25%, and 58% of pts had +ve A-Abs status in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. The mean duration of total ASPA activity (Days) adjusted for baseline antibody status is presented below, and shows that activity slightly differed with positive status; however, GRASPA maintained higher activity compared to L-ASP: Table 1. GRASPA L-ASP GRASPA L-ASP GRASPA (Arm C) Antibody status Negative Positive Negative Positive N 20 21 6 7 11 15 Mean (SD) 22.4 (3.6) 10.31 (8.1) 14.17 (5.1) 6.5 (4.0) 18.9 (6.8) 18.4 (6.2) Median 22.4 8.3 12.2 7.0 21.8 21.7 Min; Max 10.2; 30.7 0.0; 25.0 9.8; 21.8 1.9; 14.0 9.1; 27.9 6.9; 25.0 The incidence of hypersensitivity reactions were 0%, 7/21 (33%), and 2/11 (18%) in pts with negative A-Abs, compared to 0%, 6/7 (85.7%), and 1/15 (7%) in pts with positive A-Abs, in arms A, B and C, respectively. The CR rate during induction was 75%, 48%, and 64% in pts with negative A-Abs, compared to 33%, 14% and 48% in pts with positive A-Abs, in arms A, B and C, respectively. Conclusion These results show that about one third of pts without evidence of prior hypersensitivity have silent A-Abs activation. Positive A-Abs appeared to attenuate the clinical activity in all treatments arms. GRASPA consistently demonstrated activity and improved hypersensitivity regardless of A-Abs status, and therefore, GRASPA is a suitable option for patients with relapsed ALL. Disclosures Bertrand: ERYTECH Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Thomas:ERYTECH Pharma: Consultancy. Vey:Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Bonin:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment. Godfrin:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment. El Hariry:ERYTECH Pharma: Employment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 726.2-727
Author(s):  
S. Erdes ◽  
V. Mazurov ◽  
T. Dubinina ◽  
I. Gaydukova ◽  
A. Kundzer ◽  
...  

Background:According to previous studies, the effectiveness of interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors was higher in anti-TNF-naïve patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [1,2]. Netakimab (NTK) is a humanized anti-IL-17A antibody approved for the treatment of AS, psoriatic arthritis, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Russia and Belarus.Objectives:To compare the efficacy of NTK in anti-TNF-naïve patients with anti-TNF-experienced patients with active AS at week 16 of therapy.Methods:ASTERA (NCT03447704) is an ongoing phase 3 placebo (PBO)-controlled clinical study, aimed at evaluating NTK efficacy in AS [3]. 228 adult patients with active AS (BASDAI ≥ 4) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 120 mg NTK or PBO subcutaneously at week 0,1,2 and then q2w. This analysis includes 112 patients in NTK group. Efficacy endpoints included ASAS20/40, ASAS5/6 and ASAS partial remission (PR) at week 16 of therapy.Results:28 (25.0%) of 112 patients in NTK group had previous inadequate response/intolerance to anti-TNF (anti-TNF-IR): 24 (21.4%) – one anti-TNF, and 4 (3.6%) – two anti-TNF. 84 (75.0%) patients were TNF-naive. Achievement of ASAS criteria response at week 16 was similar in both groups (Table 1).Table 1.Efficacy of NTK at week 16ParameterTNF-naïve (n = 84)anti-TNF-IR (n = 28)p-value*ASAS20, n (%)52 (61.9%)17 (60.7%)0.91ASAS40, n (%)35 (41.7%)11 (39.3%)0.82ASAS5/6, n (%)39 (46.4%)11 (39.3%)0.51ASAS(PR), n (%)15 (17.9%) 4 (14.3%)0.78*- Fisher’s exact testConclusion:NTK 120 mg provided sustained improvements in signs and symptoms of AS in anti-TNF-naive and anti-TNF-IR patients at 16 weeks of therapy.References:[1]Blair HA, Dhillon S. Secukinumab: A Review in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Drugs. 2016;76(10):1023-30.[2]Dougados M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab through 52 weeks in two phase 3, randomised, controlled clinical trials in patients with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (COAST-V and COAST-W). Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(2):176-185.[3]Mazurov VI, et al. Efficacy and safety of Netakimab, anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Results of phase III international, multicenter, randomized double-blind clinical trial BCD-085-5/ASTERA. Nauchno-Practicheskaya Revmatologia=Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020;58 (4):376–386 (In Russ).Acknowledgements:This study was sponsored by JSC BIOCAD.Disclosure of Interests:Shandor Erdes: None declared, V Mazurov: None declared, Tatiana Dubinina: None declared, Inna Gaydukova Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Biocad, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Alena Kundzer: None declared, Nikolaj Soroka: None declared, Anna Eremeeva Employee of: Biocad


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2440
Author(s):  
Francesco Spagnolo ◽  
Bruna Dalmasso ◽  
Enrica Tanda ◽  
Miriam Potrony ◽  
Susana Puig ◽  
...  

Inherited pathogenic variants (PVs) in the CDKN2A tumor suppressor gene are among the strongest risk factors for cutaneous melanoma. Dysregulation of the p16/RB1 pathway may intrinsically limit the activity of MAPK-directed therapy due to the interplay between the two pathways. In our study, we assessed, for the first time, whether patients with germline CDKN2A PVs achieve suboptimal results with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi)+/−MEK inhibitors (MEKi). We compared the response rate of nineteen CDKN2A PVs carriers who received first-line treatment with BRAFi+/−MEKi with an expected rate derived from phase III trials and “real-world” studies. We observed partial response in 16/19 patients (84%), and no complete responses. The overall response rate was higher than that expected from phase III trials (66%), although not statistically significant (p-value = 0.143; 95% CI = 0.60–0.97); the difference was statistically significant (p-value = 0.019; 95% CI = 0.62–0.97) in the comparison with real-world studies (57%). The clinical activity of BRAFi+/−MEKi in patients with germline CDKN2A PV was not inferior to that of clinical trials and real-world studies, which is of primary importance for clinical management and genetic counseling of this subgroup of patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802098841
Author(s):  
Zachery Halford ◽  
Carli Coalter ◽  
Vanessa Gresham ◽  
Tabitha Brown

Objective: To assess the current literature for blinatumomab in the treatment of adult and pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Data Sources: We conducted a PubMed (inception to December 11, 2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov systematic literature search using the following terms: blinatumomab, Blincyto, lymphoblastic leukemia, and bispecific T-cell engager. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All relevant published articles, package inserts, and meeting abstracts evaluating the use of blinatumomab in ALL were considered for inclusion. Data Synthesis: Blinatumomab, a first-in-class bispecific T-cell engager monoclonal antibody, facilitates cytotoxic T-cell activation and subsequent eradication of CD19-positive B cells. The confirmatory phase III TOWER trial demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) with blinatumomab compared with standard chemotherapy (7.7 months vs 4.0 months) in relapsed and refractory (R/R) B-cell ALL. In the phase II BLAST trial, blinatumomab achieved a complete measurable residual disease (MRD) response in 78% of evaluable patients, with a median OS of 36.5 months. Potentially life-threatening cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in approximately 15% and 65% of patients, respectively. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Following initial Food and Drug Administration approval in 2014, blinatumomab gained expanded approval in pediatric patients and in Philadelphia chromosome-positive R/R ALL. In 2018, blinatumomab became the first and only drug approved for the treatment of persistent MRD in any hematologic malignancy. Emerging data demonstrate promising efficacy with blinatumomab in specific ALL settings, including frontline therapy, as a bridge to transplantation, and in “chemotherapy-free” combination regimens. Conclusions: Blinatumomab provides a paradigm-shifting treatment option; however, many questions surrounding optimal patient selection, sequencing, and cost-effectiveness remain.


Haematologica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen Lew ◽  
Yichen Chen ◽  
Xiaomin Lu ◽  
Susan R. Rheingold ◽  
James A. Whitlock ◽  
...  

Outcomes after relapse of childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) are poor, and optimal therapy is unclear. Children’s Oncology Group study AALL0433 evaluated a new platform for relapsed ALL. Between March 2007 and October 2013 AALL0433 enrolled 275 participants with late bone marrow or very early isolated central nervous system (iCNS) relapse of childhood B-ALL. Patients were randomized to receive standard versus intensive vincristine dosing; this randomization closed due to excess peripheral neuropathy in 2010. Patients with matched sibling donors received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) after the first three blocks of therapy. The prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) was also evaluated in this study. The 3-year event free and overall survival (EFS/OS) for the 271 eligible patients were 63.6% +/- 3.0% and 72.3% +/- 2.8% respectively. MRD at the end of Induction-1 was highly predictive of outcome, with 3-year EFS/OS of 84.9 +/- 4.0% and 93.8 +/- 2.7% for patients with MRD <0.1%, vs. 53.7 +/- 7.8% and 60.6 +/- 7.8% for patients with MRD ≥0.1% (p<0.0001). Patients who received HCT vs. chemotherapy alone had an improved 3-year disease-free survival (77.5 +/- 6.2% vs. 66.9 +/- 4.5%, p=0.03) but not OS (81.5 +/- 5.8% for HCT vs. 85.8 +/- 3.4% for chemotherapy, p=0.46). Patients with early iCNS relapse fared poorly, with a 3-year EFS/OS of 41.4% +/- 9.2% and 51.7% +/- 9.3%, respectively. Infectious toxicities of the chemotherapy platform were significant. The AALL0433 chemotherapy platform is efficacious for late bone marrow relapse of B-ALL, but with significant toxicities. The MRD threshold of 0.1% at the end of Induction-1 was highly predictive of outcome. The optimal role for HCT for this patient population remains uncertain. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT# 00381680).


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 322-322
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Cayuela ◽  
Paola Ballerini ◽  
Marina Romeo ◽  
Vahid Asnafi ◽  
Marie-Francoise Auclerc ◽  
...  

Abstract TEL-AML1 fusion transcripts are found in 25% of children with B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL). From June 1993 to December 1999, 1195 children with BCP-ALL were included in the FRALLE 93 protocol. Out of these, 792 were evaluated for TEL-AML1 transcript expression. There is no difference in terms of initial features, DFS, EFS, survival between evaluated (792) and non evaluated (403) patients. Out of the 792 pts, 191 (24%) expressed TEL-AML1 transcripts at diagnosis. To assess the potential prognostic value of TEL-AML1 transcripts quantification, we have retrospectively analysed follow up marrow samples using Europe Against Cancer procedures for real time quantitative RT-PCR assay, on ABI PRISM 7700 (2 reference labs) and Light Cycler apparatus (1 reference lab). Out of the 191 TEL-AML1+ve pts, 83 were evaluated for MRD at different time points after induction therapy (median = D41 (34–55) (53 evaluable pts), at D111 (62–158) (62 pts), at D216 (159–325) (33 pts) and at D838 (365–1287) (49 pts). According to normalized Ct values, samples were attributed to 4 MRD level ranging from 0 to 3 and defined as follows: 0: Ct>40 ; 1 : 36<Ct≤40 ; 2 : 33<Ct≤36 ; 3 : Ct≤33, corresponding respectively to undetectable MRD ; MRD<10-4 ; 10-4≤MRD<10-3 ; MRD≥ 10-3, with respect to dilution of REH cDNA. Distribution of pts according to MRD level at different time points after induction treatment are summarized in the following table. Seventeen relapses have occurred at a median time of 41 months (17–73)(bone marrow: 7, BM + other: 5, testis: 3, CNS: 2). A level 2 positivity at the end of induction was associated with an increased risk of relapse of 3.31(95%CI:1.02 – 10.76, p =.047) while level 3 positivity was associated with a relative risk of 9.52 (95%CI: 2.91 – 31.08, p =.0002). Positivity at D111 was associated with an increased risk of relapse of 8.6 (2.0 – 38.5, p = 0.0042), whatever the level. Combination of data obtained at D41 and D111 allows to distinguish 3 subsets of pts with decreasing relapse-free survival: from 97.5% (95%CI: 85–100%) in pts with no positivity at D111 whatever the D41 result, to 75% (95%CI: 58–92%) in pts with MRD +ve at D111 with low level at D41 and 42% (95%CI: 14–69%) in pts with MRD +ve at D111 with level 2 or 3 at D41 (p<.0001). No other prognostic factor was found (age, sex, WBC, D8 steroid response, D21 bone marrow response) which renders the MRD profile unique in this matter. Conclusion: RQ-PCR-based MRD detection is a powerful prognostic tool in TEL-AML1+ve leukemia. Combination of two time points allows a relevant stratification of pts according to the risk of relapse, compatible with clinical decision making towards intensification or deescalation in the setting of controlled trials FU time point Number of pts in MRD classes (number of relapses) 0 1 2 3 Not evaluated D41 27 (3) 11 (2) 10 (4) 5 (4) 30 (4) D111 40 (2) 14 (6) 7 (2) 1 (1) 21 (6) D216 29 (2) 2 (1) 1 (0) 1 (1) 50 (13) D838 47 (8) 1 (0) 1 (1) 0 34 (8)


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2814-2814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Deborah Thomas ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Charles Koller ◽  
...  

Abstract Combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with imatinib has improved the outcome for patients with Ph+ ALL and resulted in eradication of minimal residual disease and durable remissions without allogeneic stem cell transplant in some patients (Thomas D, Blood, 2004; Yanada M, JCO, 2006; Wassmann B, Blood, 2006; de Labarthe A, Blood, 2007). The dual Src and Abl inhibitor dasatinib has a significantly higher in vitro kinase inhibition against BCR-ABL and has demonstrated potent clinical activity in patients with imatinib-resistant lymphoid blast phase CML (CML-LB) and Ph+ ALL with over 50% complete cytogenetic responses (CG CR) in phase I and II trials but with median progression free survival of only 3 to 4 months. We are conducting a phase II trial in which patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed Ph+ ALL or CML-LB receive dasatinib 50 mg po bid for the first 14 days of each of 8 cycles of alternating hyperCVAD and high dose cytarabine and methotrexate. Patients in complete remission (CR) continue to receive maintenance dasatinib 50 mg po bid daily and vincristine and prednisone monthly for 2 years followed by dasatinib indefinitely. To date 15 newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ ALL (cohort I) and 4 patients with relapsed Ph+ ALL or CML-LB (cohort II) have received a median of 4 cycles (range 1 – 8); 4 patients are receiving maintenance in CR. Median age for cohort I is 55 years (range 23 – 79) and for cohort II, 43 years (range 26 – 69); 13 and 3 patients were older than 50 years, respectively. Median WBC at diagnosis for cohort I was 4.3 × 109/L (range, 0.8 – 203.4 x 109/L). Three patients had CNS involvement. Fourteen and 3 patients in the 2 cohorts are evaluable for response to induction; 2 are too early. Thirteen patients (93%) in cohort I and all evaluable patients in cohort II have achieved CR after the first cycle; 1 patient in cohort I died on day 20 from infections before response assessment; her bone marrow exam on day 14 showed no detectable disease. Ten of 11 (91%) patients in cohort I have achieved CG CR after 1 cycle; 3 are too early. Three of 4 patients in cohort II have achieved CG CR after 1 cycle; 1 had a new CG abnormality and 1 is too early. Six patients have achieved complete molecular remission after the first cycle with the lowest BCR-ABL/ABL in the other patients ranging from 0.01 to 1.91. Median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery for cohort I is 18 and 25 days and for cohort II 18.5 and 30.5 days. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity has included 7 episodes of GI bleeding as well as infections, diarrhea, hypophosphatemia, hypocalcemia, elevated transaminases, and acute renal failure unrelated to treatment. With a median follow up of 4 months (range, 0 – 10), 15 patients are alive and in CR; 1 died at induction, 1 died in CR from an unrelated cardiac event, and 2 are too early. No patient has relapsed and no patient has received an allogeneic transplant. We conclude that the combination of the hyperCVAD regimen with dasatinib is feasible and can achieve early molecular remissions in patients with Ph+ ALL and CML-LB.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 305-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Foà ◽  
Antonella Vitale ◽  
Anna Guarini ◽  
Maria Sefania De Propris ◽  
Loredana Elia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Dasatinib is a potent, oral inhibitor of the BCR-ABL, c-KIT and SRC kinase family, which has proven to be a more active inhibitor of BCR-ABL and c-KIT than imatinib in preclinical studies. Clinically, it has been shown to be effective in chronic myeloid leukemia and in Ph+ ALL patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib. Aims: The primary objective of the study was to assess the activity of dasatinib in de novo adult Ph+ ALL patients in terms of complete hematological remission (CHR); the secondary objectives were treatment toxicity, rate of immunophenotypic and molecular responses, disease-free survival (DFS), relapse rate and overall survival (OS). Methods: The GIMEMA LAL 1205 protocol was designed for patients ≥18 years (no upper age limit) who receive dasatinib po, 70 mg BID. A steroid pre-phase is started 7 days prior to dasatinib administration and continued up to day 31, and then tapered. The pre-phase allows identification of the BCR/ABL transcript. Dasatinib is given for 12 weeks. Two intrathecal methotrexates are administered at days +22 and +43. All cases are analyzed through a central handling of samples at presentation for morphology, immunophenotype, cytogenetics and molecular biology at the coordinating center in Rome. Minimal residual disease (MRD) is also centrally investigated by flow-cytometry and Q-RT-PCR at days +22, +43, +57 and +84. The protocol was designed for 48 patients. Results: Recruitment started in November 2006 and was completed in August 2008. The median age of the 48 enrolled BCR/ABL+ ALL patients was 54 years (range 24-76), 26 were females and 22 males. The median WBC count was 20.1 (range 2.2–133). The last analysis has been conducted on 36 patients. One patient stopped treatment after 14 days due to intestinal toxicity and 1 patient refused treatment. Thus, to date 34 patients are evaluable for response. Nineteen cases were p190+ and 15 p210+ (5 were p190/p210+). A &gt;75% response to the steroid pre-phase was recorded in 82.7% of patients. All 34 patients (100%) have witnessed a CHR: 32 (94.12%) at the 1st determination at day +22, 1 at the 2nd at day +43 and 1 at the 3rd at day +57. No fatalities have been observed. In 13 patients, at least 1 severe adverse event (SAE) has been recorded, for a total of 26 SAEs. Overall, the compliance has been good; only 1 patient stopped treatment at day 67 due to toxicity while in CHR. The median follow-up is so far 11.2 months. The OS at 10 months is 80.7%. Immunophenotypic and BCR/ABL Q-RT-PCR monitoring of MRD has shown a very marked clearance of leukemic cells by day +22, progressively strengthened at the subsequent timepoints. In p190+ cases the minimal MRD value was reached at day +43, while in p210+ cases this was observed at day +84, documenting a lower susceptibility to dasatinib by this molecular subgroup. So far, 9 patients have relapsed, at a median of 72 days from the end of induction; in agreement with the MRD data, 7/9 relapses occurred within the p210+ cases and 2/9 within the p190+ cases. The presence of mutations has been investigated in 8/9 relapsed samples: 5 showed a T315I mutation, 1 an E255K mutation and 2 were wt. Cloning experiments allowed to detect in 2 cases low levels of T315I mutations already at presentation and on MRD cells at the end of the induction treatment. The first multivariate analysis has been conducted for DFS and the degree of PCR reduction − ≤10−3 vs ≥10−3 - has so far emerged as the only significant prognostic factor. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that in adult Ph+ ALL dasatinib monotherapy is capable of inducing a CHR in virtually all patients, irrespective of age, without important toxicities and with no fatalities. The hematological response is associated with a very marked and rapid debulking of the neoplastic clone documented at the MRD level, particularly for p190+ cases. The degree of PCR response is of prognostic relevance. No relapses have been observed during the induction phase. The optimal post-induction treatment strategy, which was not part of the study, remains to be defined, particularly in light of the genetic instability of Ph+ ALL and of the selection/induction of mutations. These results, together with those previously reported by our group with imatinib alone for elderly patients, question the use of chemotherapy, with or without a TK inhibitor, for the remission induction of Ph+ ALL.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2510-2510
Author(s):  
Manuela Tumino ◽  
Benedetta Accordi ◽  
Manuela Sciro ◽  
Marco Giordan ◽  
Geertruy te Kronnie ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. ALL is the most frequent cancer in childhood. Although current chemotherapy protocols reach an event free survival (EFS) greater than 70%, the remaining cases relapse and ALL is still the first cause of death in children with cancer. Several efforts have been made to better understand the underlying mechanism involved in ALL. Current chemotherapy protocols have reached a plateau of effectiveness. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) during the course of treatment will definitively allows us to stratify children with ALL in standard (SR), intermediate (MR) and high (HR) risk, respectively. In the latter group we included patients with a prednisone poor response, with t(9;22) and t(4;11) (HR by default). Despite of this better definition of therapeutic response, the majority of relapses are included in the MR group, suggesting that we are treating different forms of ALL in this subset. For this reason new biomarkers and molecular targets are highly mandatory. The objective of functional proteome analyses of ALL is to bridge clinical applications with new biomarker discoveries that will be useful for determining prognosis and response to therapy and to identify potential new more selective treatments. Materials and Methods. We analyzed 81 diagnostic samples (peripheral blood and/or bone marrow) with B precursor ALL, that were diagnosed and treated at our centers (Catania and Padova) and enrolled in the AIEOP-LLA 2000 protocol. Reverse phase proteomic assay (RPPA) was used to interrogate the expression of 81 phosphorylated or native protein endpoints in our patients’ samples. We evaluated Pro- and Anti-Apoptotic, Protein Kinase, and Growth factor receptor cell signaling pathways. For statistical purposes, we considered the following characteristics: age at diagnosis, gender, immunophenotype, karyotype, white blood cell count and percentage of blast at diagnosis, response to prednisone, level of MRD at day 33 (TP1) and day 78 (TP2) during the induction phase. We distributed patients in 4 groups, based on risk (SR 21, MR 31, HR 10) and occurrence of relapse (19). We also studied patient specimens both at diagnosis and relapse only in those samples with a blast rate greater than 50% (10 cases out of 19). All findings obtained with RPPA were confirmed by Western blot analyses. We applied the Wilcoxon Test and the t-Test, using the ‘R’ software. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results. Comparing subgroups for gender, WBC count (higher vs less than 50.000/ml), immunophenotype (Common vs others), karyotype (t(12;21) positive vs negative), prednisone good (PGR) vs poor (PPR) responders, analysis of MRD (SR vs MR, MR vs HR, SR vs HR, MR vs MR relapsed) and diagnoses vs relapses, we did not find any statistically significant data. Conversely, we found a statistically significant higher expression of FosB and Annexin II in the group of children with WBC &gt;50.000/ml (p value &lt;0,05); and of Zap70 (Y319)/Syk (Y352) in the subgroup of MR cases who did not suffer from relapse (p value &lt;0,05). Our study showed that in the apoptotic pathway, we detected a higher expression of all the pro-apoptotic proteins [Bax, SMAC/DIABLO, Caspase 7 total and cleaved (D198)], a low expression of anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-xL, XIAP) associated with a reduction or a lack of PARP total or cleaved (D214). We also found that a specific pattern of expression (higher PTEN (S380), PARP cleaved, Caspase 7 cleaved, PDK (S241), PKAc (T197), p90RSK (S380), MEK ½ (S217–221), IKBA (S32), GRB2; lower Beta Catenine) selected a subgroup of children (n°9) with a better survival when compared with other cases (p value &lt;0,05). Conclusions. Our preliminary data showed that RPPA in association with Western blot analysis, is a reliable strategy for the identification of biomarkers and/or molecules for targeted therapy. Application of this methodology on specific subgroups of children with ALL will allow us to identify new therapeutic strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document