scholarly journals Phase 1 study of M2698, a p70S6K/AKT dual inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou ◽  
Jamie V. Shaw ◽  
Dejan Juric ◽  
Claire Verschraegen ◽  
Amy M. Weise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Therapy Resistance ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Dual Inhibitor

Abstract Background The PI3K/AKT/mTOR (PAM) pathway is a key regulator of tumor therapy resistance. We investigated M2698, an oral p70S6K/AKT dual inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer who failed standard therapies. Methods M2698 was administered as monotherapy (escalation, 15–380 mg daily; food effect cohort, 240–320 mg daily) and combined with trastuzumab or tamoxifen. Results Overall, 101 patients were treated (M2698, n = 62; M2698/trastuzumab, n = 13; M2698/tamoxifen, n = 26). Patients were predominantly aged < 65 years, were female, had performance status 1 and were heavily pretreated. There was a dose- and concentration-dependent inhibition of pS6 levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor tissue. M2698 was well tolerated; the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal, abnormal dreams and fatigue (serious, attributed to M2698: monotherapy, 8.1%; M2698/trastuzumab, 7.7%; M2698/tamoxifen, 11.5% of patients). The recommended phase 2 doses of M2698 were 240 mg QD (monotherapy), 160 mg QD (M2698/trastuzumab) and 160 mg QD/240 mg intermittent regimen (M2698/tamoxifen). In the monotherapy cohort, 27.4% of patients had stable disease at 12 weeks; no objective response was noted. The median progression-free survival (PFS) durations in patients with PAM pathway alterations with and without confounding markers (KRAS, EGFR, AKT2) were 1.4 months and 2.8 months, respectively. Two patients with breast cancer (M2698/trastuzumab, n = 1; M2698/tamoxifen, n = 1) had partial response; their PFS durations were 31 months and 2.7 months, respectively. Conclusions M2698 was well tolerated. Combined with trastuzumab or tamoxifen, M2698 demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer resistant to multiple standard therapies, suggesting that it could overcome treatment resistance. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01971515. Registered October 23, 2013.

Phase 1/2 study of eprenetapopt (APR-246) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3161-TPS3161
Author(s):  
Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava ◽  
Amit Mahipal ◽  
Xin Gao ◽  
Geoffrey Shapiro ◽  
Jason S. Starr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Growth Inhibition ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

TPS3161 Background: The p53 pathway has been implicated in antitumor immunity, including antigen presentation and T-cell proliferation. Loss of p53 function can increase resistance to immunotherapy across many tumor types. Eprenetapopt (eprenet) is a small molecule that stabilizes the folded structure of p53, resulting in activation of mutant p53 and stabilization of wild-type (WT) p53. It also targets the cellular redox homeostasis, resulting in induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. In vivo, mice carrying supernumerary copies of the TP53 gene harbor a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, an effect recapitulated in TP53 normal-copy mice treated with eprenetapopt. Combining eprenetapopt and anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 therapy resulted in enhanced tumor growth inhibition and improved survival in TP53 WT mice inoculated with B16 melanoma and MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells . Based on these results, we hypothesized that eprenet-induced p53 stabilization may augment response to immunotherapy. To test this hypothesis, we are conducting a phase 1b/2 study of eprenet in combination with pembrolizumab (eprenet+pembro) in pts with solid tumors. Methods: The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to assess the safety and tolerability of eprenet+pembro in pts with advanced solid tumors. The secondary objectives are to estimate the anti-tumor activity and to describe the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Exploratory objectives include assessing predictive and pharmacodynamic markers of response. The study includes a safety lead-in with a 3+3 dose de-escalation design for pts with advanced solid tumors with known tumor TP53 mutation status ( TP53 WT is acceptable) (max 18 pts), followed by expansion cohorts in pts with NSCLC, gastric/GEJ and urothelial cancer (max 100 pts). In expansion, pts with urothelial and gastric cancers must be naïve to anti-PD-1/ L1 therapy. Eprenet is given IV once daily on Days 1–4 while pembro is administered on Day 3 of each 21-day cycle. The RP2D of eprenet+pembro is considered the dose at which ≤ 1 of 6 pts in a cohort has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Primary endpoints are occurrence of DLTs, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs with eprenet+pembro. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response, progression free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include gene mutations by next generation sequencing (including TP53), mRNA expression, multiplex immunohistochemistry and transcriptomics, multiplex flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cytokines in serum. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. The trial opened in May 2020 and is actively enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04383938.

A phase I-II and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of the combination of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (B) and paclitaxel (P) in patients with taxane-sensitive solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13029-13029
Author(s):  
E. Gallerani ◽  
S. Cresta ◽  
D. Tosi ◽  
C. Sessa ◽  
G. Capri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

13029 Background: Proteasome inhibition blocks the chemotherapy-induced activation of NF-кB increasing chemosensitivity to anticancer agents due to increased apoptosis. NF-кB is frequently aberrantly activated in primary human carcinomas and over-expressed in aggressive breast cancer lines1 supporting the rationale for combining B with P. We designed a phase I-II and PD trial to determine the recommended dose (RD) of the B&P combination, to screen for antitumor activity in patients with potentially taxane-sensitive tumors, to search for drug-induced changes and to identify potential surrogate markers of drug activity and toxicity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Methods: Eligibility included ECOG performance status < 2, neurotoxicity < 2 and adequate organ functions. Treatment was given Q21 days: B on days 1,4, 8 and 11 and P on days 1 and 8. PBMC for gene expression profiling have been collected on day 1 and 4 before and after therapy. RECIST for response was applied. Results: Twenty-nine patients (20 female, median age 60 yrs) were accrued and 25 are evaluable (breast cancer: 13, ovarian cancer: 7, prostate cancer 1, other 4) ; 16 pts were treated in 4 escalation levels and the RD defined respectively at 1.3 mg/m2/dose & 100 mg/m2/dose for B&P. Neurotoxicity was the main toxicity (G1 36%, G2 20% and 1 case G3) requiring treatment discontinuation in 2 pts at cy 6 & 7. Other toxicities (all grades) were nausea and vomiting (68%), diarrhea (56%, G3 12%), alopecia (52%), asthenia (36%, G2 4%), and myalgia (32%, G2 8%). Antitumor activity consisted of 3 PR in pts with ovarian cancer lasting respectively 14, 8+ and 16 wks; 2 PRs in pts with breast cancer (12+ wks,14+ wks) and 1 PR in a pt with prostate cancer. Conclusions: Thus far the regimen has acceptable toxicity with evidence of antitumor activity. The trial will continue until accrual of four additional patients as planned. Footnotes 1 Adams J Current Opin Oncol 2002, 14:628–634. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phytochemicals from Ajwa dates pulp extract induce apoptosis in human triple-negative breast cancer by inhibiting AKT/mTOR pathway and modulating Bcl-2 family proteins

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsin Ali Khan ◽  
Sahabjada Siddiqui ◽  
Imran Ahmad ◽  
Romila Singh ◽  
Durga Prasad Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Apoptotic Cell ◽  
Human Peripheral Blood ◽  
Annexin V ◽  
Phoenix Dactylifera ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

AbstractAjwa dates (Phoenix dactylifera L.) have been described in traditional and alternative medicine to provide several health benefits, but their mechanism of apoptosis induction against human triple-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells remains to be investigated. In this study, we analyzed the phytoconstituents in ethanolic Ajwa Dates Pulp Extract (ADPE) by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and investigated anticancer effects against MDA-MB-231 cells. LC–MS analysis revealed that ADPE contained phytocomponents belonging to classes such as carbohydrates, phenolics, flavonoids and terpenoids. MTT assay demonstrated statistically significant dose- and time-dependent inhibition of MDA-MB-231 cells with IC50 values of 17.45 and 16.67 mg/mL at 24 and 48 h, respectively. Hoechst 33342 dye and DNA fragmentation data showed apoptotic cell death while AO/PI and Annexin V-FITC data revealed cells in late apoptosis at higher doses of ADPE. More importantly, ADPE prompted reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in ADPE treated MDA-MB-231 cells. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated that ADPE induced cell arrest in S and G2/M checkpoints. ADPE upregulated the p53, Bax and cleaved caspase-3, thereby leading to the downregulation of Bcl-2 and AKT/mTOR pathway. ADPE did not show any significant toxicity on normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells which suggests its safe application to biological systems under study. Thus, ADPE has the potential to be used as an adjunct to the mainline of treatment against breast cancer.

scholarly journals Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer: MONARCH 3 updated results in prognostic subgroups

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Johnston ◽  
Joyce O’Shaughnessy ◽  
Miguel Martin ◽  
Jens Huober ◽  
Masakazu Toi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Progesterone Receptor ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Significant Treatment

AbstractIn MONARCH 3, continuous dosing of abemaciclib with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) conferred significant clinical benefit to postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer. We report data for clinically prognostic subgroups: liver metastases, progesterone receptor status, tumor grade, bone-only disease, ECOG performance status, and treatment-free interval (TFI) from an additional 12-month follow-up (after final progression-free survival [PFS] readout). In the intent-to-treat population, after median follow-up of approximately 39 months, the updated PFS was 28.2 versus 14.8 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.525; 95% confidence interval, 0.415–0.665) in abemaciclib versus placebo arms, respectively. Time to chemotherapy (HR, 0.513), time to second disease progression (HR, 0.637), and duration of response (HR, 0.466) were also statistically significantly prolonged with the addition of abemaciclib to AI. Treatment benefit was observed across all subgroups, as evidenced by objective response rate change from the addition of abemaciclib to AI, with the largest effects observed in patients with liver metastases, progesterone receptor-negative tumors, high-grade tumors, or TFI < 36 months. Extended follow-up in the MONARCH 3 trial further confirmed that the addition of abemaciclib to AI conferred significant treatment benefit to all subgroups, including those with poorer prognosis.

scholarly journals Analysis of circulating breast cancer cell heterogeneity and interactions with peripheral blood mononuclear cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 1129-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Brechbuhl ◽  
Kiran Vinod‐Paul ◽  
Austin E. Gillen ◽  
Etana G. Kopin ◽  
Kari Gibney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Cell Heterogeneity ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Blood Mononuclear Cells

Activity and Pharmacodynamics of 21-Day Topotecan Infusion in Patients With Ovarian Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 2553-2553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Hochster ◽  
Scott Wadler ◽  
Carolyn Runowicz ◽  
Leonard Liebes ◽  
Henry Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Blood Levels ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Previously Treated

PURPOSE: Twenty-one–day topotecan infusion was administered as second-line therapy in patients with previously treated ovarian cancer (based on our prior favorable phase I experience) to determine its activity, time to progression, and pharmacodynamics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ovarian cancer patients with measurable lesions and one prior platinum-containing regimen were eligible. Topotecan 0.4 mg/m2/d 21-day continuous ambulatory intravenous infusion, with appropriate dose modifications for toxicity, was administered every 28 days. Weekly blood levels of topotecan and topoisomerase-1 (topo-1) levels in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were determined for pharmacodynamic correlation. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were entered onto the study (six cisplatin-refractory, five relapsing within < 6 months and 13 relapsing > 6 months after platinum-based therapy). A total of 128 cycles of topotecan (median, four cycles per patient; range, one to 12 cycles) were administered. The major toxicity was neutropenia (29% grade 3 in all cycles and 4% grade 4). One episode of grade 4 thrombocytopenia (4%) occurred. Fifty-two percent of the patients had anemia that required transfusions. Eight of 23 patients with measurable disease (35%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 54%) had partial responses (PRs) lasting longer than 1 month. Two of these patients had minor residual computed tomographic changes but had clinical complete remissions that lasted up to 53 weeks while they were not undergoing further therapy. One patient with nonmeasurable disease had a PR (by CA-125 criteria) that lasted 6 months, for an overall response rate of 38% in nine of 24 patients (95% CI, 18% to 57%). The median time to progression was 26 weeks. Pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in free PBMC topo-1 level at weeks 2 and 3 of drug administration. There was a strong statistical correlation between the decrease in free topo-1 levels and increasing area under the curve (AUC) for topotecan. This was confirmed in a pharmacodynamic model. CONCLUSION: Twenty-one–day infusion is a well-tolerated method of administering topotecan. Pharmacodynamic studies demonstrate correlations between (1) the week of infusion and the PBMC topo-1 level, (2) the AUC of topotecan and the decrease in topo-1 levels, and (3) the change in topo-1 level and the neutrophil nadir. The objective response rate of 35% to 38% (95% CI, 15% to 57%) in this small multicenter study is at the upper level for topotecan therapy in previously treated ovarian cancer. Prolonged topotecan administration therefore warrants further investigation in larger, randomized studies comparing this 21-day schedule with the once-daily-for-5-days schedule.

scholarly journals Genome-Wide Methylation Profiling in Canine Mammary Tumor Reveals miRNA Candidates Associated with Human Breast Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1466
Author(s):  
Su-Jin Jeong ◽  
Kang-Hoon Lee ◽  
A-Reum Nam ◽  
Je-Yoel Cho
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Mammary Tumor ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Aberrant Methylation ◽  
Canine Mammary Tumor ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Differentially Methylated Genes ◽  
Methylation Profiling

Genome-wide methylation profiling is used in breast cancer (BC) studies, because DNA methylation is a crucial epigenetic regulator of gene expression, involved in many diseases including BC. We investigated genome-wide methylation profiles in both canine mammary tumor (CMT) tissues and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and found unique CMT-enriched methylation signatures. A total of 2.2–4.2 million cytosine–phosphate–guanine (CpG) sites were analyzed in both CMT tissues and PBMCs, which included 40,000 and 28,000 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with 341 and 247 promoters of differentially methylated genes (DMGs) in CMT tissues and PBMCs, respectively. Genes related to apoptosis and ion transmembrane transport were hypermethylated, but cell proliferation and oncogene were hypomethylated in tumor tissues. Gene ontology analysis using DMGs in PBMCs revealed significant methylation changes in the subset of immune cells and host defense system-related genes, especially chemokine signaling pathway-related genes. Moreover, a number of CMT tissue-enriched DMRs were identified from the promoter regions of various microRNAs (miRNAs), including cfa-mir-96 and cfa-mir-149, which were reported as cancer-associated miRNAs in humans. We also identified novel miRNAs associated with CMT which can be candidates for new miRNAs associated with human BC. This study may provide new insight for a better understanding of aberrant methylation associated with both human BC and CMT, as well as possible targets for methylation-based BC diagnostic markers.

scholarly journals Dielectric Characterization and Separation Optimization of Infiltrating Ductal Adenocarcinoma via Insulator-Dielectrophoresis

Micromachines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ezekiel O. Adekanmbi ◽  
Anthony T. Giduthuri ◽  
Soumya K. Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Effective Potential ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Microfluidic Channel ◽  
Potential Difference ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Confirmatory Test ◽  
Fluidic Channel ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear ◽  
Dielectric Characterization

The dielectrophoretic separation of infiltrating ductal adenocarcinoma cells (ADCs) from isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in a ~1.4 mm long Y-shaped microfluidic channel with semi-circular insulating constrictions is numerically investigated. In this work, ADCs (breast cancer cells) and PBMCs’ electrophysiological properties were iteratively extracted through the fitting of a single-shell model with the frequency-conductivity data obtained from AC microwell experiments. In the numerical computation, the gradient of the electric field required to generate the necessary dielectrophoretic force within the constriction zone was provided through the application of electric potential across the whole fluidic channel. By adjusting the difference in potentials between the global inlet and outlet of the fluidic device, the minimum (effective) potential difference with the optimum particle transmission probability for ADCs was found. The radius of the semi-circular constrictions at which the effective potential difference was swept to obtain the optimum constriction size was also obtained. Independent particle discretization analysis was also conducted to underscore the accuracy of the numerical solution. The numerical results, which were obtained by the integration of fluid flow, electric current, and particle tracing module in COMSOL v5.3, reveal that PBMCs can be maximally separated from ADCs using a DC power source of 50 V. The article also discusses recirculation or wake formation behavior at high DC voltages (>100 V) even when sorting of cells are achieved. This result is the first step towards the production of a supplementary or confirmatory test device to detect early breast cancer non-invasively.

Combination chemotherapy versus single-agent therapy as first- and second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 3720-3730 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Joensuu ◽  
K Holli ◽  
M Heikkinen ◽  
E Suonio ◽  
A R Aro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
World Health ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Significant Difference

PURPOSE We report results of a randomized prospective study that compared single agents of low toxicity given both as the first-line and second-line chemotherapy with combination chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer with distant metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients in the single-agent arm (n = 153) received weekly epirubicin (E) 20 mg/m2 until progression or until the cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2, followed by mitomycin (M) 8 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, and those in the combination chemotherapy arm (n = 150) were first given cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, E 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 three times per week (CEF) followed by M 8 mg/m2 plus vinblastine (V) 6 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. Exclusion criteria included age greater than 70 years, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status greater than 2, prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and presence of liver metastases in patients younger than 50. RESULTS An objective response (complete [CR] or partial [PR]) was obtained in 55%, 48%, 16%, and 7% of patients treated with CEF, E, M, and MV, respectively. A response to CEF tended to last longer than a response to E (median, 12 v 10.5 months; P = .07). Treatment-related toxicity was less in the single-agent arm and quality-of-life (QOL) analysis favored the single-agent arm. No significant difference in time to progression or survival was found between the two arms. Similarly, no difference in survival was found when the patients who received both the planned first-and second-line treatments were compared or when survival was calculated from the beginning of the second-line therapy. CONCLUSION Patients treated with single-agent E followed by single-agent M had similar survival, but less treatment-related toxicity and better QOL as compared with those treated with CEF followed by MV.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document