Survival among cancer patients undergoing opioid rotation to methadone as compared to other opioids.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 183-183
Author(s):  
Akhila Sunkepally Reddy ◽  
Sriram Yennu ◽  
Ulrich S. Schuler ◽  
Maxine Grace De la Cruz ◽  
Jimin Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
The Other ◽  
Pain Response ◽  
Opioid Rotation ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Methadone Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Strong Opioids

183 Background: Recent studies have reported that methadone has antineoplastic activity. Other studies have associated methadone with lower overall survival in patients with chronic pain. Methadone is the most frequent opioid chosen for purpose of opioid rotation (OR) in cancer patients experiencing refractory pain or opioid induced neurotoxicity. There is no data available on the association of methadone with overall survival in cancer patients. Our aim was to compare the characteristics and overall survival in cancer patients in methadone group with other strong opioid group. Methods: In this ad hoc analysis, we reviewed 2471 consecutive patient visits to the supportive care center of a tertiary cancer center in 2008 for ORs from strong opioids to methadone or other strong opioids with a follow-up visit within 6 weeks. Information regarding demographics, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), and morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) were collected. Successful pain response was defined as 2-point or 30% reduction in pain score. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate survival. Results: Of the 102 eligible patients, 54 underwent OR to methadone and 48 to other strong opioids. The median age was 56 years, 56% were male, and 81% had advanced cancer. There were no significant differences between the methadone group and the other opioid group in patient characteristics, performance status, MEDD, and ESAS scores. Although both the groups showed significant pain response, methadone group (72%) had a significantly higher pain response as compared to the other opioid group (65%; P = 0.04). The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the methadone group and the other opioid group [median OS: 5.2 months (95% CI 3.64-7.41) vs. 5.9 months (95% CI 2.6-9.2); P = 0.89]. Conclusions: We observed no significant difference in overall survival in cancer patients in methadone group as compared to other opioids. Further validation studies in a larger sample are warranted.

The conversion ratio for opioid rotation from hydrocodone to other strong opioids in cancer patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 164-164
Author(s):  
Akhila Sunkepally Reddy ◽  
Sriram Yennu ◽  
Jimin Wu ◽  
Diane Liu ◽  
Suresh K. Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Conversion Ratio ◽  
Opioid Rotation ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Strong Opioids

164 Background: Cancer pain is initially treated with intermediate strength analgesics such as hydrocodone and subsequently escalated to stronger opioids. There are no studies on the process of opioid rotation (OR) from hydrocodone to strong opioids in cancer patients. Our aim was to determine the conversion ratio (CR) for OR from hydrocodone to morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) in cancer outpatients. Methods: We reviewed records of 3,144 consecutive patient visits at our Supportive Care Center in 2011-12 for OR from hydrocodone to stronger opioids. Data regarding demographics, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), and MEDD were collected in patients who returned for follow up within 6 weeks. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the CR between hydrocodone and MEDD. Successful OR was defined as 2-point or 30% reduction in the pain score and continuation of the new opioid at follow up. Results: 170/3,144 patients underwent OR from hydrocodone to stronger opioid. 72% were white, 56% male, and 81% had advanced cancer. The median time between OR and follow up was 21 days. 53% had a successful OR with significant improvement in the ESAS pain and symptom distress scores. In 100 patients with complete OR and no worsening of pain at follow up, the median CR (Q1-Q3) from hydrocodone to MEDD was 1.5 (0.9-2) and hydrocodone dose to MEDD correlation was.52 (P<0.0001). The correlation of CR with hydrocodone dose was -0.52 (P<0.0001). The median CR of hydrocodone to MEDD was 2 in patients receiving < 40mg of hydrocodone/day and 1 in patients receiving ≥ 40mg of hydrocodone/day (P<0.0001). The median conversion ratio of hydrocodone to morphine was 1.5 (n=44) and hydrocodone to oxycodone was 0.9 (n=24). Conclusions: Hydrocodone is 1.5-fold stronger than Morphine. The median conversion ratio from hydrocodone to MEDD varied according to hydrocodone dose/day. [Table: see text]

The Opioid Rotation Ratio (ORR) from transdermal fentanyl (TDF) to strong opioids in cancer patients.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 182-182
Author(s):  
Akhila Sunkepally Reddy ◽  
Sriram Yennu ◽  
Suresh K. Reddy ◽  
Jimin Wu ◽  
Diane D Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Transdermal Fentanyl ◽  
Opioid Rotation ◽  
Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale ◽  
Strong Opioids

182 Background: Despite being the most frequently prescribed strong opioid by oncologists, there is a lack of knowledge of the accurate the opioid rotation ratio (ORR) from transdermal fentanyl (TDF) to other strong opioids in cancer patients. Opioid rotation (OR) from TDF to other strong opioids is performed very frequently in cancer patients for uncontrolled pain or opioid induced neurotoxicity (OIN). The aim of our study was to determine the ORR of TDF to other strong opioids, as measured by morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD). Methods: In this ad hoc analysis, we reviewed 2471 consecutive patient visits to the supportive care center of a tertiary cancer center in 2008 for an OR from TDF to other strong opioids by a palliative medicine specialist. Information regarding demographics, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), and MEDD were collected in patients who followed-up within 6 weeks. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the ORR between TDF dose and net MEDD (MEDD after OR minus MEDD of breakthrough opioid used along with TDF before OR). Successful OR was defined as 2-point or 30% reduction in pain score and continuation of the new opioid at follow up. Results: 47/2471 patients underwent OR from TDF to other opioids and followed-up within 6 weeks. The median age was 54 years, 53% were male, and 77% had advanced cancer. The median time between OR and follow up was 14 days. Uncontrolled pain (83%) followed by OIN (15%) were the most frequent reasons for OR and 77% had a successful OR with significant improvement in ESAS pain and symptom distress scores. In patients with OR and no worsening of pain at follow-up (n = 41), the median ORR (range) from TDF mg/day to net MEDD was 100 (12.5-217), TDF mcg/hour to net MEDD was 2.4 (0.3-5.2), and correlation of TDF dose to net MEDD was .60 (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: The median ORR from TDF mg/day to MEDD is 100 and from TDF mcg/hour to MEDD is 2.4. Further validation studies are needed.

scholarly journals Relationship Between Obesity and Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Among Women With Operable Breast Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (25) ◽  
pp. 4072-4077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Litton ◽  
Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
Carla L. Warneke ◽  
Aman U. Buzdar ◽  
Shu-Wan Kau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Operable Breast Cancer ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Response To Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Purpose To understand the mechanism through which obesity in breast cancer patients is associated with poorer outcome, we evaluated body mass index (BMI) and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) in women with operable breast cancer. Patients and Methods From May 1990 to July 2004, 1,169 patients were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center and received NC before surgery. Patients were categorized as obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), overweight (BMI of 25 to < 30 kg/m2), or normal/underweight (BMI < 25 kg/m2). Logistic regression was used to examine associations between BMI and pathologic complete response (pCR). Breast cancer–specific, progression-free, and overall survival times were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Median age was 50 years; 30% of patients were obese, 32% were overweight, and 38% were normal or underweight. In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in pCR for obese compared with normal weight patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.26). Overweight and the combination of overweight and obese patients were significantly less likely to have a pCR (OR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.95; and OR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.99, respectively). Obese patients were more likely to have hormone-negative tumors (P < .01), stage III tumors (P < .01), and worse overall survival (P = .006) at a median follow-up time of 4.1 years. Conclusion Higher BMI was associated with worse pCR to NC. In addition, its association with worse overall survival suggests that greater attention should be focused on this risk factor to optimize the care of breast cancer patients.

scholarly journals Impact of Treatment Facility Chracteristics on Patient (Pt) Outcomes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Using Data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Allison Taylor ◽  
Kimberley Doucette ◽  
Bryan Chan ◽  
Xiaoyang Ma ◽  
Jaeil Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Rural Residence ◽  
Integrated Network ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction The literature suggests a widespread reduction in the availability and accessibility of newer treatment options among marginalized groups in AML. Studies from large national databases point to lower socio-economic status, Hispanic and African American race, Medicare or no insurance, being unmarried, treatment at non-academic centers, and rural residence as negatively impacting overall survival (OS) and rates of chemotherapy utilization in AML patients (Patel et al. 2015, Jaco et al. 2017, Bhatt et al. 2018, Master et al. 2016). We hypothesized that facility affiliation and pt volume would also have important effects on time to treatment (TTT) and OS in AML, even when these socioeconomic disparities were accounted for. Methods For this retrospective analysis, we used NCDB data that included 124,988 pts over the age of 18 with AML between the years 2004-2016. Variables analyzed included facility types described as community cancer programs (CP), comprehensive community cancer programs (CCP), academic/research center cancer programs (AC) and integrated network cancer programs (IN), and volume of facilities defined as high volume (HV) and low volume (LV). HV facilities had case volumes of ≥ 99th percentile and all other facilities were classified as LV. Multivariate analyses (MVA) included demographic and socioeconomic covariables. We used Cox proportional hazard analysis for both TTT and OS MVA. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median TTT and OS, and the log rank test used to compare TTT and OS across predictor variables. Results The median age of AML patients was 63 yrs (range 18-90) with 54% males, and 86% Caucasian. Five percent of patients were treated at CP, 30% at CCP, 44% at AC, and 10% at IN. 21% at HV facilities and 79% at LV facilities. Median TTT in days at CP facilities was 7, compared to 5 days in CCP and AC facilities versus 4 days at IN (p&lt;0.0001). TTT was 5 days at HV facilities versus 4 days at LV facilities (p&lt;0.0001). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that TTT was similar between HV and LV facilities(figure 1). The median OS was 3.25 months in CP compared to 4.34 months at CCP, 5.06 months at IN and 9.53 months at AC (p&lt;0.0001). For facility volume, the median OS was 13.11 months in HV facilities compared to 6.93 months in LV facilities (p&lt;0.0001). When sex, race, age, Hispanic Origin, education, urban/rural residence, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity score and Great Circle Distance were adjusted for in MVA (table 1), the OS was higher in AC versus CP facilities (hazard ratio [HR] of 0.90 (0.87-0.93, p&lt;0.0001), and there was no statistically significant difference with comparison of other facility types to CP. Similarly, there was a lower OS at LV versus HV facilities with a HR of 1.14 (1.12-1.16, p&lt;0.0001). CCP facilities had a shorter TTT compared to CP with a HR of 1.21 (1.17-1.26, p&lt;0.0001). AC had a shorter TTT than CP with a HR of 1.17 (1.13-1.22, p&lt;0.0001), and IN had a shorter TTT compared to CP with a HR of 1.29 (1.24-1.34, p&lt;0.0001). Additionally, TTT in the MVA for facility volume was shorter in LV facilities compared to HV facilities with HR of 1.05 (1.04-1.07, p&lt;0.0001) [table 1]. Conclusion When adjusting for various socioeconomic factors, we found that TTT was longest in CP compared to CCP, AC, and IN. Treatment at a LV facility resulted in a decreased overall survival. LV facilities may be less familiar with treatment regimens for AML, less likely to use novel treatment options, and be less familiar with the disease. We showed that treatment at an AC compared to CP, CCP and IN facilities improved survival. Given poor outcomes for AML, these results show the importance of going to AC and HV facilities with more experience in treating AML for improved outcomes. Disclosures Lai: Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy.

scholarly journals P14.56 Recurrent Glioblastomas: Should we operate a second and even a third time

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii80-iii80
Author(s):  
M Yahia-Cherif ◽  
O De Witte ◽  
C Mélot ◽  
F Lefranc
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Second Surgery ◽  
Second Resection ◽  
Initial Resection

Abstract BACKGROUND The aim of this study was i) to analyse the effect of repeat surgeries on the survival of patients with focally recurrent glioblastoma who have benefited from temozolomide treatment and ii) to identify potential prognostic factors for survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS Cases from 2005 to 2014 in the glioblastoma database of our department were retrospectively reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) as a function of time after one, two and three surgical resections. All patients received the standard of care after the first surgery (temozolomide during and after radiotherapy) and adjuvant treatment after repeat surgeries. RESULTS One hundred-thirty-two glioblastoma patients (median age: 57 years) were included in the study. Among them, 68, 53 and 11 patients underwent one, two and three surgical resections, respectively. The median OS was 11, 16 and 18 months, respectively, for patients who underwent one, two and three surgical resections. Patients who underwent two (p<0.001) or three (p<0.01) surgeries survived significantly longer than patients who underwent only one. No significant difference was observed between patients who underwent two versus three surgeries (p=0.76). A second resection performed more than 6 months after the initial resection was the only factor associated with prolonged survival (p=0.008). CONCLUSION Glioblastoma patients who benefited from temozolomide treatment and underwent surgery for recurrent glioblastoma exhibited a significant increase in survival compared with patients who did not undergo a second surgery. By contrast, a third surgery for a second recurrence did not contribute to any significant survival benefit.

scholarly journals A descriptive report of outcomes of primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving either an adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 904-909
Author(s):  
Brooke A Schlappe ◽  
Qin C Zhou ◽  
Roisin O'Cearbhaill ◽  
Alexia Iasonos ◽  
Robert A Soslow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Kaplan Meier

ObjectiveWe described progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with primary mucinous ovarian cancer receiving adjuvant gynecologic versus gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens.MethodsWe identified all primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens at a single institution from 1994 to 2016. Gynecologic pathologists using strict pathologic/clinical criteria determined diagnosis. Adjuvant therapy was coded as gynecologic or gastrointestinal based on standard agents and schedules. Clinical/pathologic/treatment characteristics were recorded. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables, and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Progression-free and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, applying landmark analysis.ResultsOf 62 patients identified, 21 received adjuvant chemotherapy: 12 gynecologic, 9 gastrointestinal. Median age (in years) at diagnosis: 58 (range 25–68) gynecologic cohort, 38 (range 32–68) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.13). Median body mass index at first post-operative visit: 25 kg/m2(range 18–31) gynecologic cohort, 23 kg/m2(range 18–31) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.23). History of smoking: 6/12 (50%) gynecologic cohort, 3/9 (33%) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.66). Stage distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: stage I: 9/12 (75%) and 3/9 (33%); stage II: 2/12 (17%) and 1/9 (11%); stage III: 1/12 (8%) and 5/9 (56%) (p=0.06). Grade distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: grade 1: 8/12 (67%) and 1/9 (13%); grade 2/3: 4/12 (33%) and 7/9 (88%) (p=0.03). Three-year progression-free survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7 %) gynecologic, 53.3% (95% CI 17.7% to 79.6%) gastrointestinal. Three-year overall survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7%) gynecologic, 76.2% (95% CI 33.2% to 93.5%) gastrointestinal.ConclusionOngoing international collaborative research may further define associations between chemotherapy regimens and survival.

Dose Intensive Induction Chemotherapy Does Not Decrease Tumor Contamination of Autograft or Improve Survival for Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplant.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2932-2932
Author(s):  
Farzana A. Sayani ◽  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Peter Faris ◽  
Mary Lynn Savoie ◽  
Ahsan Chaudhry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Time To Relapse

Abstract Multiple dose intensive chemotherapy regimens have been used for induction/mobilization of stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma. However, the exact role and regimens of such dose intensive chemotherapy has not been clearly defined. We therefore did a retrospective study to determine if dose intensive cyclophosphamide (Cyclo) 5.25 g/m2, etoposide 1.05 g/m2 and cisplatin 105 mg/m2 (DICEP) results in improved relapse rate and survival compared to standard mobilization with only Cyclo 2 g/m2. Between January 1998 and March 2004, a consecutive series of 57 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving DICEP (38) or Cyclo (19) for in-vivo purging/mobilization were analyzed. Both groups were similar in regards to age and sex. There were no significant differences in IPI score, Durie-Salmon stage, B2 microglobulin, calcium, creatinine and albumin levels between treatment groups. Outcomes included time to relapse and time to death. Median follow up time was 799 days. Kaplan-Meier plots for time to relapse showed no significant difference (p=0.0992). Median relapse time in the DICEP group was 905 days (95% CI 580–1604) compared to 1112 days (95% CI 742-infinity) in the Cyclo group. Kaplan-Meier plots for overall survival showed no significant difference between both groups (p=0.8664). The median survival times have not yet been reached in either group and are not reported. Analysis revealed no discernable confounding risk factors. Effects of treatment on outcomes were not altered after adjusting for IPI score and Durie-Salmon staging using the stratified log-rank test. Small sample size and short duration of followup are potential limiting factors for this study, however, preliminary analysis of a larger sample of 91 multiple myeloma patients receiving either DICEP or a less intense induction/mobilization regimen, also revealed no significant difference in disease free or overall survival. Monoclonal plasma cell contamination of stem cell products was not significantly different between both groups (DICEP 42.9%, Cyclo 56.3%, p=0.5573). This study therefore suggests that the very intense DICEP induction/mobilization regimen results in no significant difference in survival outcomes. The more intense regimen does not significantly decrease tumor contamination of autograft stem cells. Overall, our experience suggests that novel induction therapies such as bortezomib, lenolidomide etc. should be pursued in preference to any further study of high dose cytotoxic chemotherapy induction. Figure Figure

Serum Profile Of Multiple Cytokines and Adhesion Molecules In Newly Diagnosed AML Patients Differs In Those Who Did Not Reach Complete Remission After Anthracycline/Cytarabine Induction Therapy

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4997-4997
Author(s):  
Tomas Kupsa ◽  
Jan M Horacek ◽  
Martina Vasatova ◽  
Ladislav Jebavy ◽  
Pavel Zak
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Adhesion Molecules ◽  
Adhesion Molecule ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
The Other ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Cytokines and adhesion molecules have been studied as markers of immune system activation in various diseases including AML/MDS. Cytokines are soluble molecules taking part in intercellular communication with a specific role in cell proliferation and differentiation control. Further knowledge gained from multiple cytokine and adhesion molecule analysis should allow better diagnosis and disease management. Aims The aim of our study was to evaluate baseline serum levels of multiple cytokines and adhesion molecules in Caucasian population AML patients and compare it with standard prognostic indicators in patients with AML. Methods A total of 28 consecutive newly diagnosed AML patients (11 males, 17 females, age 21 to 71 years, mean 52.3 ± 12.1, median 55.4 years, 8 with better risk, 13 with intermediate risk, 7 with high risk according to cytogenetics and molecular genetics) were administered 3+7 induction regimen with escalated dose of daunorubicin 90mg/m2. We evaluated serum levels of the following 22 cytokines and adhesion molecules: interleukins (IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-23), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), epidermal growth factor (EGF), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), E-selectin, L-selectin, P-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1). All biomarkers were measured by biochip array technology on Evidence Investigator analyzer (Randox) at the diagnosis of AML and compared with standard prognostic indicators in AML. Probability values (p) < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results As there was no significant difference between younger and elderly patients, we evaluated the cohort as a whole. Comparing serum cytokine and adhesion molecule levels in patients who did not achieve CR after induction therapy (n=6, 21.5%) to those who achieved CR (n=22, 78,5%) a statistically significant increase in serum IL-2 (5.42 ± 5.42 ng/L vs. 2.02 ± 1.84 ng/L; p < 0,05), IL-7 (11.71 ± 10.77 ng/L vs. 3.50 ± 1.51 ng/L; p < 0.05), IL-8 (241.9 ± 225.3 ng/L vs. 34.31 ± 25.47 ng/L; p < 0.005), IL-10 (7.74 ± 6.83 ng/L vs. 2.83± 2.68 ng/L; p < 0.05) was found. Both groups differed from healthy individuals in serum levels of IL-4, IL-6, IL-13, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin and L-selectin. We found moderate inverse correlation between overall survival and levels of VCAM-1 and E-selectin. There was no significant difference in cytokines and adhesion molecules levels among established prognostic subgroups in AML. Conclusions The results in general are in agreement with outcome of our pilot trial. Compared with the other studies of cytokine levels in newly diagnosed AML, our data indicate different conclusions. IL-2, IL-4 and IL-10 were more likely to be higher in those who attained remission (Kornblau et al., Blood 2010). We did not find association between IL-6 and IL-10 levels and survival in our studied group (Correa et al, Cytokine 2013). On the other hand we documented inverse correlation between levels of some adhesion molecules and overall survival. Whether these alterations depend on the studied population is not known definitely. To assess their predictive value for patient outcome, further studies in a larger number of patients is necessary. Acknowledgment The work was supported by Specific research project “Analysis of defined prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia” (FMHS) and by a long-term organisation development plan 1011 (FMHS). Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Difference of Treatment Outcomes in AL Amyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma with / without Translocation (11;14)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4224-4224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenshi Suzuki ◽  
Miho Kasuga ◽  
Kanji Miyazaki ◽  
Sohsuke Meshitsuka ◽  
Yu ABE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chromosome Aberration ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cardiac Response ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Positive Group ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Organ Response

Abstract Introduction AL amyloidosis (AL) is characterized by the deposition of immunoglobulin light chains as amyloid fibrils accumulated in different organs. Translocation (11;14) (t(11;14)) is seen in about half of AL patients, but the clinical significance is still unknown. So our study has focused on the chromosome aberration of t(11;14). We report the relationship between the chromosome aberration and the organ response, the organ involvement which greatly influence prognosis of AL patients. Furthermore, we examined the prognosis and treatment response to compare t(11;14) influences of AL with t(11;14) influences of multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods We analyzed in AL and symptomatic MM patients have t(11;14) using fluorescence in situ hybridization from January 2010 to December 2014 in Japanese Red Cross Medical Center. We examined the overall survival and the therapy response rate. In addition, we compared t(11;14)-positive and negative in AL and MM respectively. Besides, we investigated the involved organ parts and the organ response with melphalan and dexamethasone (MD) therapy in AL. Outcome was assessed based on remission after three months and one year. Remissions were determined according to consensus criteria in 2011 for AL and IMWG uniform criteria for MM. Survival distribution of OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Data between t(11;14)-positive and negative were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test or X2 test. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS statistics ver.23. Results Among 27 patients with AL, 9 cases were t(11;14)-positive patients (age median, 64yr; range, 37-80), and 13 out of 46 were positive in MM (age median, 64yr; range, 34-86). (excluded complication of both AL and MM cases) In AL cases, the t(11;14)-positive group tended to shorter overall survival (OS) than negative cases. On the other hand, in the patients with MM, positive group tended to superior OS to negative (AL: P=0.442(Fig.1A), MM: P=0.327(Fig.1B)). Compared with t(11;14)-negative AL group, t(11;14) positive group was tended to have much organ involved numbers of amyloid protein (67% v 34%; P=0.109) and much cardiac involvement patients (67% v 39%; P=0.171). On the other hand, there were little cardiac and renal response in both t(11;14)-positive and negative with MD therapy after 3 months (heartF17% v 0% P=0.462/renalF0% v 0%). In MM patients, ORR after 3 months were 67% and 79% in t(11;14)-positive and negative cases respectively (P=0.386). That after 1 year were 78% and 74% respectively (P=0.889). Conclusion t(11;14) is important prognostic factor and showed conflict prognosis between AL and MM. From this investigation, the importance of connecting the chromosome abnormality every disease was shown. In addition, our investigation recognized tendencies that the amyloid involvement rate to the heart was high, and the cardiac response with MD therapy were low in AL t(11;14)-positive group. As these results, we thought that t(11;14)-positive AL patients' OS were shortened. The significant difference did not appear in this examination while these tendencies were clearly accepted in little number of patient cases. Further investigation using rather number of patient samples is needed. In conclusion, the cardiac amyloid involvement is high in the AL t(11;14)-positive group, and the cardiac response by MD therapy is low. We should have doubt eyes of the amyloid involvement to the heart in AL t(11;14)-positive patients, and have the posture that can support cardiac amyloidosis immediately. In addition, breakthrough new treatments are expected urgently for AL patients. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Overall survival trends in pediatric osteosarcoma patients over the past three decades

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10041-10041
Author(s):  
R. van Schie ◽  
M. Hagleitner ◽  
P. Hoogerbrugge ◽  
U. Flucke ◽  
H. Schreuder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Histological Response ◽  
Treatment Protocols ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
The Past ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pediatric Osteosarcoma

10041 Background: In the late seventies, the combination of chemotherapy and surgery, significantly improved survival of osteosarcoma patients. However, the chemotherapeutic drugs used for treatment of osteosarcoma patients has not significantly changed since then although surgery clearly improved further and adjuvant chemotherapy have been added. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated, whether after the introduction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the late seventies, further improvement in outcome of pediatric osteosarcoma patients was achieved. Methods: Since 1978 and 2008, 54 previously untreated pediatric patients with osteosarcoma were enrolled in six consecutive regimens of different agents and intensity. The main difference between the treatment protocols is the addition of either methothrexate or ifosfamide. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) in relationship to the different treatment regimens was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Significance of difference in outcome were calculated using the log rank test. Results: The 5-year EFS and OS of the whole group was 54.7% and 61.1%, respectively. There was no significant difference in outcome in patients treated between 1978 and 1993 (n = 18), as compared to patients treated after 1993 (n = 36, OS 47.1% vs 69.4%, p = 0.34). Of all treatment regimens used, OS was the highest in patients treated with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and methotrexate (OS after 5 year 70%). Multivariate analysis showed that EFS and OS significantly correlated with the histological response but not with one of the treatment regimens used. Conclusions: No significant improvement in overall survival has been accomplished in pediatric osteosarcoma patients during the past thirty years. Histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was the most important prognostic factor. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document