Clinical outcome for continuous versus intermittent chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: Comparative analysis after first-line therapy.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 825-825
Author(s):  
Nadine Abdallah ◽  
AMR Mohamed ◽  
Hibah Ismail ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Alaa Akhras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
P Value ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Interval ◽  
Significant Difference

825 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common and second most lethal cancer in the U.S, with almost 50% of patients developing metastatic disease. Although survival of metastatic CRC (mCRC) has improved significantly, current treatment strategies are associated with many adverse effects. With no prospect of cure, goals of treatment should consider both quantity and quality of life. Interruption of chemotherapy after induction can represent a means to achieve this balance. Methods: The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the effect of continuation vs interruption of systemic therapy in terms of survival in patients with unresectable mCRC after first line treatment. Among 15 prospective studies published from 2009-2017, 9 qualified for inclusion. Random-effect model was used for pooled effects within two main categories: continuous chemotherapy vs chemotherapy-free interval after first line induction. Studies with maintenance fluoropyrimidine and/or bevacizumab were excluded. Primary endpoint was median progression free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoint was median overall survival (OS). z statistics were used for comparing subgroups. All statistical tests were two-sided. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: 1366 patients (55% males) were included in the final analysis. Induction treatment was 5-FU or capecitabine-based chemotherapy with either oxaliplatin or irinotecan with or without bevacizumab. After stratifying for induction status, there was no statistically significant difference in median PFS between continuous vs chemotherapy free interval [Median PFS 4.74-month (95% CI 3.87-5.61) vs 3.52 month (95% CI 2.97-4.07), z-test adjusted p value 0.1383]. No significant difference in median OS between both groups [Median OS 16.95-month (95% CI 15.40-18.50) vs 18.35 month (95% CI 15.17-21.54)]. Conclusions: In mCRC patients, the superiority of continuous chemotherapy was not demonstrated. Further studies should shed light on patient and tumor characteristics most likely to benefit from continuous chemotherapy to limit delivery of cytotoxic therapy to this subset of patients.

Comparative analysis of different maintenance regimens after first-line induction in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 789-789
Author(s):  
AMR Mohamed ◽  
Nadine Abdallah ◽  
Hibah Ismail ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Hyejeong Jang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
P Value ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference

789 Background: Although, previous trials have demonstrated the benefits of maintenance chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC), the optimal maintenance regimen with acceptable safety profile is still undetermined. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of the most common clinically used maintenance regimens after first line therapy in MCRC. Methods: Among 52 prospective studies published 2009-2017, 14 were qualified for inclusion. Random-effect model was used for pooled effects within different categories include those with no maintenance treatment versus different maintenance regimens (Bevacizumab, capecitabine, bevacizumab plus capecitabine, bevacizumab plus erlotinib, and cetuximab). Primary endpoint was median progression free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoint was median overall survival (OS). All statistical tests were two-sided and p values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: 14 studies with 3553 patients (57% males) were included in final analysis. Induction treatment was 5-FU or capecitabine - based chemotherapy with either oxaliplatin or irinotecan with or without bevacizumab. After stratifying for induction status, patients who did not receive treatment had worse PFS compared to maintenance treatment [pooled median PFS 3.52 months, 95% CI (2.97- 4.07) Vs 5.08 months, 95% CI (4.59- 5.57), z-test adjusted p-value 0.0005]. Among different maintenance regimens, capecitabine /bevacizumab combination showed better PFS [pooled median PFS 6.87 month, 95% CI (5.17- 8.57)], however the results were not significant (z test adjusted p-value 0.1383). No statistical significant difference in median OS between maintenance regimens. Conclusions: MCRC patients who did not receive maintenance treatment had shorter PFS. Although the superiority of bevacizumab plus capecitabine maintenance cannot be confirmed, there was a trend towards better PFS. This study suggests that bevacizumab plus capecitabine may be an appropriate maintenance option after first induction therapy depending on the tolerability and compliance with oral capecitabine.

Comparative Evaluation Of Efficacy of Omeprazole versus Lansoprazole for Relief of Functional Dyspepsia: A Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (S1) ◽  
pp. e000155
Author(s):  
Shahnoor Gowani ◽  
Devang Rana
Keyword(s):  
Functional Dyspepsia ◽  
Epigastric Pain ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
P Value ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Presenting Symptoms ◽  
Mesh Terms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Difference

Introduction: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is defined as a condition chronically presenting symptoms centered in the upper abdomen, such as epigastric pain or discomfort, in the absence of any organic, systemic, or metabolic disease that is likely to explain the symptoms. Proton pump inhibitors are main line agents to treat functional Dyspepsia. Omeprazole is conventional PPI and Lansoprazole is a new PPI both are said to be effective option to treat functional dyspepsia in individual trials. Aim and Objective: To compare efficacy of Omeprazole versus Lansoprazole for Relief of Functional Dyspepsia. Methodology: All randomised control trials which follows PRISMA guidelines 2009 and in which Omeprazole and Lansoprazole were first compared with placebo for the treatment of functional dyspepsia. Clinical trial registries, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE database were searched for MeSH terms Omeprazole, Pantoprazole, Placebo which resulted in the treatment of Functional Dyspepsia. Observational studies, Unpublished studies, RCTs not following PRISMA guidelines were excluded. Data was analyzed using RevMan version 5.3 ® and Odd’s Ratio was calculated to determine the difference in Early and late phases. Both Fixed and Random effect model was utilized to calculate the difference. To compare the difference between Omeprazole and Lansoprazole Fischer’s exact test was used. P value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The I2 will be used to measure the heterogeneity between studies and a value >30.0 will be considered to reflect heterogeneity. Results: A total of 10 studies were included consisting of 3934 patients. Omeprazole was effective than placebo to treat functional dyspepsia(Odd’s ratio=1.603, CI=1.264 to 2.033, p value less than 0.01) Lansoprazole was also effective when compared to placebo to treat functional dyspepsia. (Odd’s ratio=0.748, CI=0.553 to 1.011, p=0.058). When Omeprazole was compared to lansoprazole indirectly statistically significant difference was seen (P=0.0001). Conclusion: Both Omeprazole and Lansoprazole are effective to treat functional dyspepsia when compared to placebo. Omeprazole is more effective than Lansoprazole to treat functional dyspepsia.

Treatments (tx) after progression to first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts): A pooled analysis of TRIBE and MOMA studies by GONO group.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3542-3542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Rossini ◽  
Roberto Moretto ◽  
Chiara Cremolini ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Giuseppe Tonini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
First Line ◽  
Aggressive Disease ◽  
Free Interval ◽  
Disease Biology ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

3542 Background: FOLFOXIRI plus bev is regarded by international guidelines as a valuable option in the first-line tx of mCRC pts. One of the major concerns for the adoption of this regimen is the potential limitation of subsequent therapeutic options. The aim of the present analysis was to focus on treatments received after progression in TRIBE (NCT00719797) and MOMA (NCTNCT02271464) studies. Methods: We collected data of tx received after progression and their outcome in terms of 2ndPFS (time from 2nd line tx start to disease progression or death) and OS II (time from 2nd line tx start to death). For pts in which the same drugs used in first-line were totally or partially reintroduced, the chemotherapy-free interval (CFI, time from the last administration of irinotecan or oxaliplatin during first-line to disease progression) was calculated. Results: Out of 482 pts treated with upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bev, 429 progressed. 303 (70.6%) pts received a 2nd line tx: 93 FOLFOXIRI +/- bev (Group A), 119 FOLFOX/XELOX or FOLFIRI +/- bev (Group B) and 91 other tx (Group C), including an anti-EGFR moAb in 60 cases. No difference was observed among the three groups in terms of 2ndPFS (median 2nd PFS Group A: 5.6 vs Group B: 4.4 vs Group C: 3.9 mos; p = 0.60) or OS II (median OS II Group A: 14.9 vs Group B: 13.8 vs Group C: 11.7 mos; p = 0.49). In the subgroup of pts with a CFI < 6 mos, Group A (n = 52) reported longer 2ndPFS compared to both Group B (n = 58) (median 2ndPFS 5.3 vs 3.0 mos; HR: 0.61,95%CI 0.41-0.89; p = 0.009) and Group C (n = 58) (5.3 vs 3.2 mos; HR: 0.71, 95%CI 0.48-1.05; p = 0.07). Consistent results were achieved in OS II (Group A vs Group B; median OS 13.6 vs 10.8 mos; HR: 0.65, 95%CI 0.42-1.00; p = 0.053; Group A vs Group C 13.6 vs 8.9 mos; HR: 0.60, 95%CI 0.39-0.93; p = 0.002). In the subgroup of pts with a CFI ≥ 6 mos, no significant difference was shown between Group A (n = 41) and Group B (n = 61) or C (n = 33). Conclusions: Tx after progression to first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bev are feasible and show expected efficacy results. The reintroduction of the triplet plus bev seems more effective than doublets plus bev or other tx when a more aggressive disease biology is suggested (CFI < 6 mos).

Efficacy and Toxicity of Addition of Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 718-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Cong Ruan ◽  
Yue-Ping Che ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Hai-Feng Li
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Clinical Prognosis ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Pre-treated patients with first-line treatment can be offered a second treatment with the aim of improving their poor clinical prognosis. The therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did not respond to first-line therapy has limited treatment options. Recently, many studies have paid much attention to the efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared with bevacizumab-naive based chemotherapy as second-line treatment in people with metastatic CRC. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies updated to March 2018. Randomized-controlled trials comparing addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy without bevacizumab in MCRC patients were included, of which, the main interesting results were the efficacy and safety profiles of the addition of bevacizumab in patients with MCRC as second-line therapy. Result: Five trials were eligible in the meta-analysis. Patients who received the combined bevacizumab and chemotherapy treatment in MCRC as second-line therapy showed a longer overall survival (OS) (OR=0.80,95%CI=0.72-0.89, P<0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (OR=0.69,95%CI=0.61-0.77, P<0.00001). In addition, there was no significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.36,95%CI=0.82-2.24, P=0.23) or severe adverse event (SAE) (RR=1.02,95%CI=0.88-1.19, P=0.78) between bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and bevacizumabnaive based chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the addition of bevacizumab to the chemotherapy therapy could be an efficient and safe treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as second-line therapy and without increasing the risk of an adverse event.

The JPJDF has Synergistic Effect with Fluoropyrimidine in the Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-269
Author(s):  
Xiaoling Fu ◽  
Yanbo Zhang ◽  
Lisheng Chang ◽  
Dengcheng Hui ◽  
Ru Jia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Synergistic Effect ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Regimen ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Maintenance chemotherapeutic regimen with low toxicity is needed for metastatic colorectal cancer. A recent patent has been issued on the spleen-strengthening and detoxification prescription (JPJDF), a traditional Chinese herbal medicinal formula with anti-angiogenesis effect. The clinical effect of JPJDF on the maintenance treatment of advanced colorectal cancer has not been evaluated. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of JPJDF in combination with fluoropyrimidine compared to fluoropyrimidine alone as maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: We applied a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, single center clinical study design. A total of 137 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were recruited. Patients received either Fluoropyrimidine (Flu-treated group, n = 68), or Fluoropyrimidine plus JPJDF (Flu-F-treated group, n = 69) as maintenance treatment after 6-cycle of FOLFOX4 or FOLFORI induction treatment. The primary endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were safety, Performance Status (PS) score and other symptoms. Results: The endpoint of disease progression was observed in 91.7% of patients. The PFS was 5.0 months and 3.0 months in the Flu-F-treated and Flu-treated groups, respectively. The OS was 15.0 months and 9.0 months in the Flu-F-treated and Flu-treated groups, respectively. Some common symptoms, such as hypodynamia, anepithymia, dizziness and tinnitus and shortness of breath, were improved in the Flu-F-treated group. There was no significant difference in the common adverse reactions between the two groups. Conclusion: JPJDF and fluoropyrimidine have synergistic effect in the maintenance treatment of mCRC.

scholarly journals Association of interleukin-17A rs2275913 polymorphism with rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility in Sudanese population

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 205031212110202
Author(s):  
Rgda Mohamed Osman ◽  
Mounkaila Noma ◽  
Abdallah Elssir Ahmed ◽  
Hanadi Abdelbagi ◽  
Rihab Ali Omer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Case Group ◽  
Molecular Technique ◽  
Interleukin 17A ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease. This study aimed to determine the association of interleukin-17A-197G/A polymorphism with rheumatoid arthritis in Sudanese patients. Methods: A case–control study was conducted between March and December 2018. Clinical and demographic data of the study participants were collected and analyzed. Polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism molecular technique was done to investigate interleukin-17A-197G/A polymorphisms. All statistical tests were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Results: The study population included 266 participants aged between 1 and 85 years, with an average of 40 years, classified into 85 (31.2%) cases (mean age 48.5 ± 11.3 years), and 181 (68.8%) controls (mean age 35.3 ± 15.9 years). The interleukin-17A homozygote AA genotype was more frequent among the control group compared to the case group; 95 (52.5%) and 7 (8.2%), respectively. The homozygote GG and the heterozygote AG genotypes were proportionally not different among the cases and control groups; 13 (54.2%) and 11 (45.8%), and 65 (46.4%) and 75 (53.6%), respectively. According to the distribution of interleukin-17A genotypes, a statistically significant difference was observed among cases with the interleukin-17A AA and AG genotypes, p values 0.001 and 0.004, respectively. For the association interleukin-17A genotypes and family history a negatively significant association was reported (95% confidence interval, –0.219, p value = 0.001). There was also a negatively significant association of interleukin-17A genotypes and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (95% confidence interval, −0.141, p value = 0.002). Conclusion: This study is the first study in Sudan established the association between interleukin-17A-197G/A (rs2275913) polymorphisms and susceptibly to rheumatoid arthritis. These findings appeal for further research in Sudan to investigate the exact role of IL-17A in immunopathology and disease severity among Sudanese rheumatoid arthritis

scholarly journals Comparison of irinotecan and oxaliplatin as the first-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadayuki Kawai ◽  
Nozomi Takeshima ◽  
Yu Hayasaka ◽  
Akifumi Notsu ◽  
Mutsumi Yamazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
First Line ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
High Incidence

Abstract Background Irinotecan (IRI) and oxaliplatin (Ox) are standard therapeutic agents of the first-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that treatment with Ox-based compared with IRI-based regimens was associated with better overall survival (OS). However, these reports did not include trials of molecular targeting agents and did not take methods for the administration of concomitant drugs, such as bolus or continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil, into account. A systematic literature review was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicity profiles between IRI- and Ox-based regimens as the first-line treatments for mCRC. Methods This meta-analysis used data from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and SCOPUS. The primary endpoint was OS, and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Results Nineteen trials involving 4571 patients were included in the analysis. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of OS, PFS, and ORR. There was no significant heterogeneity. Regarding ≥ grade 3 AEs, IRI-based regimens were associated with a high incidence of leukopenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea. Moreover, there was a high incidence of thrombocytopenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy in patients who received Ox-based regimens. In a subgroup analysis, IRI combined with bevacizumab was correlated with a better PFS (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.82–0.98, P = 0.02), but not with OS (pooled HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.80–1.03, P = 0.15). Conclusion Although the safety profiles of IRI- and Ox-based regimens varied, their efficacy did not significantly differ. The combination of anti-VEGF antibody and IRI was associated with better PFS compared with anti-VEGF antibody and Ox. Both regimens could be used as the first-line treatments for mCRC with consideration of the patients’ condition or toxicity profiles.

Efficacy and prognostic significance of triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin and irinotecan based chemotherapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: An observational multicenter study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15586-e15586
Author(s):  
Mohamed Alghamdi ◽  
Shouki Bazarbashi ◽  
Elsamany Shereef ◽  
Mervat Mahrous ◽  
Omar Al shaer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Neutrophil Count ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

e15586 Background: In Saudi Arabia, the incidence of colorectal cancer has been increased over the past few years. The optimal treatment beyond the second line is not fully understood. To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and disease outcomes of triflurodine/tipiracil in Saudi patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC) has not been studied yet. Our study is a real-life practice evaluation of the efficacy of triflurodine/tipiracil in patients with refractory mCRC. Moreover, the prognosis and the prognostic significance of the different clinical variables have been analyzed. Methods: A retrospective, multi-centers ( 5 centers representative of Saudi Arabia )observational study in patients with mCRC who have received triflurodine/tipiracil beyond oxaliplatin & Irinotecan-based chemotherapy between December 2018-December 2020.We aimed to assess the response to triflurodine/tipiracil, to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS ), the overall survival (OS), and the associated factors of prognostic significance. Results:The data of 100 patients with refractory mCRC who has received triflurodine/tipiracil have been analyzed. The mean age was 55.2 +11.8 years. Forty-two patients were (42%) females and 58 (58%) were male patients. Sigmoid was the most common primary site of cancer in 35 (35%) patients, followed by rectum 29 (29%). Peritoneal metastasis was present in 17 (23.3%) patients ,liver in 51(56.6%) and lung in 39 (50.7%). Metastatic sites were ≥ 2 in 45 (45%) patients. Metastatic lesions were ≥ 5 in 65 (65%) patients. Xelox chemotherapy regimen was the most commonly used first-line chemotherapy which represents 43%, while Folfiri or Xeliri combination was the most used second line in 57 (60%). For the third line, Folfox or Xelox was used in 81 (83.5%) patients. The fourth line was given to 49 (67.1%). For first-line biological agents, Cetuximab was used most frequently 31 (46.3%).Evaluation of the response to treatment with triflurodine/tipiracil revealed one patient (1%) with a complete response,3 patients (3%) with partial response, 28 (28%) patients with stable disease, and 66 (66%) showed progressive disease. The estimated median progression-free survival was 5 months ( 3.839 - 6.161) and the median overall survival was 12 months (9.732-14.268). The log-rank analysis showed that the baseline neutrophils ≤ 75 % ( P-value= 0.0092) and low hemoglobin level (P-value= 0.0245) were strongly associated with a higher survival. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, the neutrophil count ≤ 75 % was the only independent predictor for survival. Conclusions: Trifluridine/tipiracil is effective in patients with refractory mCRC. The low neutrophil count might predict a better overall survival.

scholarly journals MCKAT, a multi-dimensional copy number variant kernel association test

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nastaran Maus Esfahani ◽  
Daniel Catchpoole ◽  
Javed Khan ◽  
Paul J. Kennedy
Keyword(s):  
Copy Number ◽  
Kernel Method ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Score Test ◽  
Copy Number Variant ◽  
Association Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Single Pair ◽  
Related Trait

AbstractBackgroundCopy number variants (CNVs) are the gain or loss of DNA segments in the genome. Studies have shown that CNVs are linked to various disorders, including autism, intellectual disability, and schizophrenia.Consequently, the interest in studying a possible association of CNVs to specific disease traits is growing. However, due to the specific multi-dimensional characteristics of the CNVs, methods for testing the association between CNVs and the disease-related traits are still underdeveloped. We propose a novel multi-dimensional CNV kernel association test (MCKAT) in this paper. We aim to find significant associations between CNVs and disease-related traits using kernel-based methods.ResultsWe address the multi-dimensionality in CNV characteristics. We first design a single pair CNV kernel, which contains three sub-kernels to summarize the similarity between two CNVs considering all CNV characteristics. Then, aggregate single pair CNV kernel to the whole chromosome CNV kernel, which summarizes the similarity between CNVs in two or more chromosomes. Finally, the association between the CNVs and disease-related traits is evaluated by comparing the similarity in the trait with kernel-based similarity using a score test in a random effect model. We apply MCKAT on genome-wide CNV datasets to examine the association between CNVs and disease-related traits, which demonstrates the potential usefulness the proposed method has for the CNV association tests. We compare the performance of MCKAT with CKAT, a uni-dimensional kernel method. Based on the results, MCKAT indicates stronger evidence, smaller p-value, in detecting significant associations between CNVs and disease-related traits in both rare and common CNV datasets.ConclusionA multi-dimensional copy number variant kernel association test can detect significantly associated CNVs with any disease-related trait. MCKAT can help biologists detect significantly associated CNVs with any disease-related trait across a patient group instead of examining the CNVs case by case in each subject.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy between ketamine, memantine, riluzole and d-cycloserine in patients diagnosed with drug resistant depression: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1132
Author(s):  
Nishita H. Darji ◽  
Devang A. Rana ◽  
Supriya D. Malhotra
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Fixed Effect ◽  
P Value ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Effect Model ◽  
Resistant Depression ◽  
Glutamate Modulators

Background: Glutamate modulators are having immense potential and are newer entities for treating drug resistant depression. The objectives were to generate statistical evidence on basis of existing data of ketamine, memantine, riluzole and d-cycloserine in resistant depression.Methods: A total of 14 RCTs following PRISMA guidelines and matching inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected of ketamine (5), memantine (3), riluzole (2) and d-cycloserine (4) vs placebo in drug resistant depression. Only RCTs with primary diagnosis of drug resistant depression (Previously on two standard antidepressant therapy) were included. Studies with treatment response rate, 50% reduction in total score of the depression rating scale-Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale or the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale or Beck Depression Inventory was chosen as clinical outcome measure. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the analysis.Results: In ketamine group using random effect model SMD was 2.122 (95% CI 0.659-3.584). P-value was statistically significant (random effect p <0.005 and in fixed effect <0.001). In memantine group, using random effect model -0.963 was SMD and (95% CI -1.958-0.0324). P-value was <0.001, significant in fixed effect. In riluzole group, SMD was -0.564 with (95% CI -3.927-2.799) in random effect. P-value was 0.741. In d-cycloserine group SMD was 0.316 with (95% CI -1.252-1.885) in random effect. P-value was 0.690.Conclusions: Ketamine showed best efficacy followed by memantine. Riluzole and DCS as such have no efficacy although its acts by same glutamate pathway. More molecular based research is required in use of glutamate modulators in resistant depression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document