Systemic therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after progression on immune-oncology plus VEGF targeted therapy combinations (IO-VEGF).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4576-4576
Author(s):  
Yasser Ged ◽  
Ruby Gupta ◽  
Cihan Duzgol ◽  
Natalie Shapnik ◽  
Almedina Redzematovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Line Of Therapy

4576 Background: IO-VEGF combinations are the backbone for current and future therapeutic developments in RCC with several IO-VEGF regimens reporting positive results in phase 3 trials. However, limited data exists on outcomes to subsequent therapy in patients progressing on IO-VEGF regimens. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with ccRCC at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute who initiated systemic therapy post IO-VEGF regimens including combinations with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (IO-TKI) and combinations with anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies (IO-mAB). Patients treated on unreported clinical trials were excluded from the outcomes analysis. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) post IO-VEGF. The secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to RECIST v1.1. Kaplan-Meier methods and the log-rank test were used to evaluate time from start of systemic therapy post IO-VEGF to the event of interest. Results: Fifty-nine patients were treated after discontinuation of IO-VEGF regimens. Prior IO-VEGF regimens included IO-mAB (n = 35, 59%) and IO-TKI (n = 24, 41%). IMDC scores at the start of next line of therapy were favorable in 20%, intermediate in 60% and poor in 20%. Next line of therapy included VEGFR-TKI monotherapy (n = 45, 76%), VEGFR-TKI based combinations (n = 6, 10%), mTOR inhibitors (n = 3, 5%), and unreported clinical trials (n = 5, 9%). VEGFR-TKI containing regimens (n = 51) included cabozantinib (n = 22), axitinib (n = 17), lenvatinib/everolimus (n = 4), pazopanib (n = 4), and others (n = 4). Median OS was 24.5 months (95% CI 12-NE) with a 12 months OS rate of 63%. The ORR was 27% (14/51) and the median PFS was 6.8 months (95% CI 4.8-11). No difference in post IO-VEGF OS was observed when comparing IO- TKI vs IO-mAB (log rank p = 0.7). Conclusions: Post combination IO-VEGF treatment, most patients received VEGFR-TKIs. In this setting, VEGFR-TKIs continue to show clinical activity similar to historic experiences of patients post VEGF monotherapy.

Phase (Ph) 1b/2 evaluation of olaratumab in combination with gemcitabine and docetaxel in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11517-11517
Author(s):  
Steven Attia ◽  
Victor Manuel Villalobos ◽  
Nadia Hindi ◽  
Brian Andrew Van Tine ◽  
Andrew J. Wagner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Parameter Estimates ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ecog Ps

11517 Background: Doxorubicin (doxo) remains standard first-line therapy for advanced STS. Doxo in combination with olaratumab (O) demonstrated superior clinical activity compared to doxo alone in a Ph 2 trial (NCT01185964), although this was not confirmed in the subsequent Ph 3 trial (NCT02451943). Gemcitabine (G) plus docetaxel (D) is a second line therapy for advanced STS. Here, we report a concurrent Ph 2 study that explored a second-line addition of O to G and D for advanced STS (ANNOUNCE 2 NCT02659020). Methods: Adult patients (pts) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic STS, ≤ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy, and ECOG PS 0-1 were eligible. Pts were enrolled from 2 cohorts: O-naïve and O-pretreated. In both cohorts, pts were randomized 1:1 to either O, G plus D or placebo (PBO), G plus D. Pts received 21-day cycles of O (20 mg/ kg cycle 1 and 15 mg/kg other cycles, day (d) 1 and d8), G (900 mg/m2, d1 and d8) and D (75 mg/m2, d8). Pts continued treatment until progression, toxicity, or withdrawal. Randomization was stratified by histology (leiomyosarcoma [LMS] vs non-LMS), prior systemic therapy, ECOG PS, and prior pelvic radiation. The primary objective was overall survival (OS) in the O-naïve population using an alpha level of 0.20. Secondary endpoints included OS (O-pretreated) and other efficacy parameters, as well as safety and pharmacokinetics (PK). Results: 167 pts were enrolled in the O-naïve cohort and 89 pts in the O-pretreated cohort. Baseline patient characteristics were well balanced. OS for O-naïve pts was 16.8 vs 18.0 months (m) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.64-1.40; p = 0.78) for the investigational vs control arm, respectively. Other efficacy outcomes are presented in the table. Safety was manageable across treatment arms. PK parameter estimates for O were consistent with previous studies. Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the two arms in the O-naïve population. However, while not statistically significant, the combination of O, G and D demonstrated favorable OS in the O-pretreated cohort, and PFS and objective response rate (ORR) in both cohorts. For O-naïve pts, a clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement was observed. Further investigations in specific histological subtypes are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02659020. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab in patients undergoing nephrectomy for locally-advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS686-TPS686
Author(s):  
Jose A. Karam
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

TPS686 Background: Sitravatinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (RTKI) that targets multiple closely related RTK pathways including VEGFR, PDGFR, KIT, MET and the TAM receptors (TYRO3, AXL and MERTK) Nivolumab is a monoclonal antibody against PD-1 and releases PD-1-mediated inhibition of T-cell proliferation and cytokine production. Together, sitravatinib and nivolumab may cooperate to elicit greater anti-tumor activity than either agent alone, as sitravatinib is predicted to enhance several steps in the cancer immunity cycle that may augment nivolumab’s efficacy. Mechanisms by which sitravatinib may augment an antitumor immune response include enhanced antigen presentation; depletion of immunosuppressive regulatory T-cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) via inhibition of split kinases VEGFR and KIT; and shifting tumor-associated macrophages from an immunosuppressive M2 to a pro-immunogenic M1 phenotype via inhibition of TAM RTKs. Each of these factors converge on promoting T effector cell expansion, tumor infiltration and an antigen-specific anti-tumor immune response. Methods: This open-label, non-randomized, preoperative window of opportunity Phase 2 study evaluates tolerability and clinical activity of sitravatinib in combination with nivolumab in pts with locally-advanced ccRCC undergoing nephrectomy. Study treatment consists of 2 weeks of sitravatinib monotherapy followed by 4 weeks of the combination. Sitravatinib is administered orally daily at 120 mg; nivolumab intravenously every 2 weeks at 240 mg. The primary objective is to evaluate clinical activity using percentage of pts achieving a presurgical point-in-time objective response. Secondary objectives include evaluation of safety and tolerability, and determination of the immune effects of sitravatinib monotherapy and the combination through serial tissue and blood collections (temporal changes in PD-L1 expression, selected cytokines and immune cell populations including MDSCs, Tregs and ratio of M1:M2 macrophages). The study is open for enrollment and recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03680521.

Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma(nccRCC): ORACLE study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4580-4580
Author(s):  
Deepak Kilari ◽  
Aniko Szabo ◽  
Pooja Ghatalia ◽  
Tracy L Rose ◽  
Nicole Weise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clear Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
New Combination ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clear Cell Rcc ◽  
Rhabdoid Differentiation

4580 Background: Despite advances in the treatment of clear cell RCC, there is a paucity of data to guide management of nccRCC due to the heterogeneity and rarity of these tumors. The clinical activity of new combination therapies (including immunotherapy (IO), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGF), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors) in metastatic nccRCC is not known. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, we explored the efficacy of combination systemic therapies in patients with nccRCC. Baseline and follow-up demographic, clinical, treatment, and radiographic data were collected. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by investigator review. Secondary endpoints include progression- free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), median duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and biomarker correlates. Results: Among 66 included patients, median age was 59 yr; 60% were male and 62% white. Histologies included papillary (38%), chromophobe (17%), unclassified (24%), translocation (12%), and other (9 %). Sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid differentiation was present in 18%, 70% had prior nephrectomy, 86% were IMDC intermediate/poor risk, 29% and 32% had liver and bone metastasis respectively. 67% received combination treatment in the first line. Comparison of outcomes based on treatment regimen is shown in the table. Conclusions: Antitumor activity was observed with novel combinations in nccRCC which warrants further prospective studies. Response rates and survival with combination therapy in this dataset remain inferior to rates seen in clear cell RCC.[Table: see text]

Safety and efficacy of the anti-CD73 monoclonal antibody (mAb) oleclumab ± durvalumab in patients (pts) with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), or EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRm NSCLC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9047-9047
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Patricia LoRusso ◽  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Anne M. Noonan ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Human Dose ◽  
Local Immunosuppression ◽  
Grade 3

9047 Background: Upregulation of CD73 in multiple cancers increases adenosine production, leading to local immunosuppression. Oleclumab, a human IgG1λ mAb, inhibits CD73 function and may increase antitumor immunity. Initial data from a Phase I, first-in-human, dose-escalation and expansion study showed that oleclumab ± durvalumab had manageable safety and encouraging clinical activity in pts with advanced CRC or PDAC. We report updated safety and activity in these cohorts and the first results in an expansion cohort of pts with advanced EGFRm NSCLC. Methods: Previously treated pts with histologically or cytologically confirmed microsatellite stable CRC, PDAC, or EGFRm NSCLC received oleclumab 5–40 mg/kg (escalation) and 40 mg/kg (expansion) IV Q2W, alone (escalation only) or with durvalumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W. The primary objective was safety; secondary efficacy objectives included objective response (OR) per RECIST v1.1 and duration of response (DoR). Results: 66 pts were enrolled in the escalation phase (35 CRC, 31 PDAC) and 126 in the expansion phase (42 CRC, 42 PDAC, 42 EGFRm NSCLC). At data cutoff (DCO; June 9, 2020), the median number of oleclumab doses was 4 in pts on monotherapy (range 1–26) and 4 in pts on combination therapy across both phases (range 1–76). In the escalation phase, there were no DLTs in pts on monotherapy or combination therapy; treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 54.8% of pts on monotherapy (Grade 3–4 in 7.1%) and 54.2% of pts on combination therapy (Grade 3–4 in 20.8%); fatigue was the most common TRAE with both regimens. No TRAEs resulted in death. In previous interim analyses before this DCO, no ORs were reported in the escalation phase. In the expansion phase, 5 pts were treated for ≥12 mos; 6 pts were ongoing at DCO. TRAEs occurred in 54.0% (Grade 3–5 in 15.1%); the most common TRAEs were fatigue (15.1%), diarrhea (9.5%), and rash (7.1%). One pt had a TRAE resulting in death (systemic inflammatory response syndrome). ORs were seen in 1 CRC pt (DoR 35.9+ mos [+ = ongoing response]), 2 PDAC pts (DoR 22.1+ and 28.6+ mos), and 4 EGFRm NSCLC pts (DoR range 5.6 to 15.7+ mos, median not reached; only 1 of the 4 pts had ≥25% programmed cell death ligand-1 [PD-L1]+ tumor cells). Nine CRC pts, 8 PDAC pts, and 9 EGFRm NSCLC pts had SD. Of 6 pts with matched biopsies who received combination therapy, 5 had increases in CD8+ T cells, PD-L1, and granzyme B. Baseline tumor CD73 expression and association with clinical response will be presented. Conclusions: Oleclumab ± durvalumab had a tolerable safety profile and combination therapy showed promising antitumor activity in EGFRm NSCLC. ORs and SD were durable, even in tumor types that are generally immunotherapy-resistant. Clinical trial information: NCT02503774.

Association of the neutrophil to eosinophil ratio with response to immunotherapy-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 341-341
Author(s):  
Matthew D Tucker ◽  
Katy Beckermann ◽  
Kristin Kathleen Ancell ◽  
Kerry Schaffer ◽  
Renee McAlister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Exact Test

341 Background: Neutrophilia is known to be associated with worse prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, less is known about the role of eosinophils in the response to immunotherapy (IO). We investigated the association of the baseline neutrophil to eosinophil ratio (NER) with outcomes to IO-based combination treatment in mRCC. Methods: Patients with mRCC treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, or avelumab plus axitinib at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center were retrospectively identified. Patients on >10mg prednisone and patients with prior IO were excluded. Baseline NER (at time of first IO) and association with progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were investigated. Data cutoff was 9/1/2020. Analysis for PFS and OS was performed using the log-rank test and Mantel-Haenszel method, and analysis of the odds ratio for ORR was performed using Fischer’s exact test. Results: Sixty-one patients were identified: 89% clear cell histology, 74% prior nephrectomy, 69% IMDC intermediate risk, and 72% treatment-naïve. Patients with baseline NER < median (N=31) had improved clinical outcomes compared to patients with baseline NER > median (N=30) (Table). Improvement in PFS by NER was maintained when stratified by anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 and anti-PD(L)-1/VEGF (p= 0.0062 and p= 0.049); however, differences in OS and ORR were no longer significant. The median baseline NER among patients with partial response (PR) was significantly lower at 22.7 (95% CI 18.9-31.1) vs. 51.6 (95% CI 39.5-93.1) among those with progressive disease (PD) (p= 0.0054). For comparison, the median neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was not significantly different between PR (2.60) and PD (3.84, p= 0.056). Conclusions: Patients with a low baseline NER treated with IO-based combinations had improved clinical outcomes compared to patients with a high baseline NER. Additional investigation of this parameter in larger cohorts is warranted. [Table: see text]

Retrospective analysis of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nabP) administered as a single agent in the treatment of recurrent stage IV (st4) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18029-e18029
Author(s):  
Ashish Saxena ◽  
Paul J. Christos ◽  
Jennifer M. Cagney ◽  
Ronald J. Scheff
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Early Stage Nsclc ◽  
Risk Of Progression ◽  
Line Of Therapy

e18029 Background: NabP is a formulation of P designed to reduce toxicity of therapy and increase drug delivery to tumor cells. An established therapy for st4 breast cancer, single-agent nabP has also been shown to produce responses in frontline therapy of st4 NSCLC. Its role in relapsed NSCLC has not been well reported. Methods: We analyzed the records of st4 NSCLC patients (pts) treated with single-agent nabP at our institution. Cases were assessed with regard to age, sex, KPS, histology, line of systemic therapy, prior taxane exposure, # of cycles administered, dose attenuation, and progression-free survival (PFS) estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Standard dosing of nabP was considered to be 260 mg/m2 IV Q 21 days. Disease was considered to have progressed on the date of any clinical assessment (typically CT scan) that led the treating oncologist to conclude that disease had progressed. All pts completed nabP therapy except 1, who was assessed at 427 days of follow up. Results: From Oct 2008 to Jan 2012, 15 st4 NSCLC pts (median age 67, range 48 to 82; 8 F, 7 M; KPS 60-80%; 12 adenocarcinoma, 2 squamous cell, 1 unspecified) received a median of 3 cycles (range 1-17) of single-agent nabP. All pts received at least 1 prior line of systemic therapy in the st4 setting: 6 received nabP as 2nd line therapy, 4 as 3rd line, and 5 as 4th line. 5 pts had also received prior chemotherapy for early stage NSCLC. 9 pts were taxane-naïve; 6 had received prior taxane therapy. 10 pts began nabP at standard dose; 5 began on an attenuated dose or schedule. Subsequent dose reduction occurred in 3 pts due to toxicity (fatigue, myelosuppression). Only 1 patient discontinued treatment due to toxicity (myalgias, arthralgias). Median PFS for all pts was 82 days (95% CI 35 to 205 days). Older age reduced risk of progression [hazard ratio 0.93 per 1-year age increase (95% CI 0.86 to 0.99), P=0.04]. Prior taxane exposure decreased PFS (median 39 vs. 113 days, P=0.07 by log-rank test). PFS did not vary by KPS, histology, or line of therapy. Conclusions: Single-agent nabP administered in relapsed St4 NSCLC is well tolerated and associated with extension of PFS, particularly in older and taxane-naïve pts.

STAT-3 and Β-catenin expression in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 583-583
Author(s):  
Aline Fusco Fares ◽  
Isabela Cunha ◽  
Daniel Vilarim Araujo ◽  
Leonardo de Azevedo Boente ◽  
Daniel Garcia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Criteria

583 Background: In mRCC, there are no prospectively validated biomarkers to guide the treatment and therapy decision is based on prognostic scores and histology. STAT-3 and Wnt/b-cateninare cell proliferation pathways and have already been related to prognostic in renal cell carcinoma. Objective: to evaluate the role of STAT-3 and b-catenin expression as prognostic biomarkers in clear cell mRCC. Methods: 684 medical records of renal cell carcinoma patients treated at AC Camargo Cancer Center from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed. 86 out of 684 patients fulfilled the study criteria: metastatic clear cell carcinoma, no sarcomatoid features, previous systemic therapy, previous nephrectomy and available tumor specimens from metastatic site. Pathological samples were arranged in a TMA. The number of positive stainings cells for each antibody in each core was categorized as low positive or negative versus highly positive expression. Results: We had available tissue blocks from 47 tumors. 32/45 patients (71,1%) had highly positive membrane b-catenin and none of the patients was positive for nuclear b-catenin. 27 /45 (60%) were categorized as low positive or negative STAT-3. There was no statistically significant association between STAT-3 and b-catenin expression with clinical prognostic criteria (MSKCC and Heng criteria). In the multivariate analysis, KPS < 80% (p = 0.02; HR: 2.7), time from nephrectomy to metastasis < 1 year (p = 0.04; HR: 2.1), no hypothyroidism (p = 0.05; HR: 2.4) and MSKCC criteria (p = 0.02; HR: 2.5) were confirmed as negative prognostic factors. Associative analysis showed that none of the patients with negative membrane b-catenin had response to systemic therapy (p=0.02). OS was 35.5 months (IC 22.2-48.8) and PFS was 12.5 months (IC 10.0-14.0). Conclusions: in our cohort, STAT-3 and B-catenin expression are not associated with the prognostic criteria (MSKCC and Heng). The loss of B-catenin expression is associated to a worse response rate to antiangiogenic therapy in metastatic clear cell renal cancer. [Table: see text]

Assessment of the Fanconi anemia repair pathway as a predictor of clinical activity of pembrolizumab (PEM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Villalona-Calero ◽  
John Paul Diaz ◽  
Zuanel Diaz ◽  
Wenrui Duan ◽  
Eric Douglas Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

2555 Background: Given the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in mismatch repair deficient tumors, we evaluated if homologous recombination repair deficiency associates with solid tumor response to ICI. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 trial (NCT03274661) of PEM in metastatic solid tumor patients progressing on standard of care and for whom PEM had no FDA approved indication. We evaluated a triple stain (FANCD2foci/DAPI/Ki67) immunofluorescence functional assay of the Fanconi Anemia pathway (FATSI) in treated patients’ archived tumors as a correlative biomarker. Patients with microsatellite unstable tumors were not eligible. The primary objective was objective response rate (iORR, CR+PR) by Immune Response Criteria, with the hypothesis that patients with FATSI negative tumors will have better clinical outcome. Secondary objectives were progression free survival (PFS), 6 months PFS and survival. PEM was given every 3 weeks and computed tomography scans were performed every 6 weeks. We utilized a two-stage phase II trial design to detect an iORR ≥ 20% in the whole population tested vs. the null hypothesis that the true iORR ≤5%. If ≥ 2 of the first 20 evaluable patients had an objective response the trial proceeded to full accrual of 39 evaluable patients. Outcomes were evaluated according to FATSI staining. Results: 42 patients (40 evaluable) (35F,7M; median age 62[36-83]) enrolled. Median # of prior regimens was 2[1-7]. Primary Dx included ovarian/fallopian (13), endometrial (10), colorectal (3), cervix (2), pancreatic(2), vaginal (2) and 1 each of various others. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Response evaluation showed 2 CR, 5 PR, 11 SD, 22 PD and 2 NE (iORR 18%). FATSI tumor analyses results are available in 34 patients; 25 FATSI positive, 9 negative. 2 PR, 8 SD, 14 PD, 1 NE occurred among the FATSI (+) (iORR 8%) and 2 CR, 2 PR, 2 SD, 3 PD among the FATSI (-) patients (iORR 44%). mPFS and 6m-PFS were 54 days and 12% (3/25) in FATSI (+), versus 248 days and 56% (5/9) in FATSI (-) patients; p = 0.017. Conclusions: PEM has meaningful antitumor activity in non MSI-high malignancies with no current FDA approved indications. Evaluation of FATSI as a biomarker supports a biomarker selected population approach. Clinical trial information: NCT03274661.

Analysis of real-world data (RWD) on treatment (tx) sequencing in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20642-e20642
Author(s):  
Meng Ma ◽  
Xiang Zhou ◽  
Howard Goldsweig ◽  
Nicholas Hahner ◽  
Dianwei Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Of Therapy ◽  
Line Setting

e20642 Background: While optimal sequencing of systemic therapy in aNSCLC is critical to achieve maximal clinical benefit, it is practically challenging to study tx sequencing through clinical trials. RWD allow retrospective, observational studies to examine tx patterns and associated clinical outcomes. Methods: 1,609 aNSCLC patients who received systemic therapies at Mount Sinai hospitals were analyzed for the number of line of therapy (LOT), therapeutic modalities (chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy), and the sequence in which treatments were given when LOT > 1. Time to tx discontinuation (TTD) was used as a surrogate clinical endpoint for outcomes. Results: 578 of the 1,609 (36%) patients received more than one LOT. 356 (22%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and 297 (16%) received immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that among 297 patients who received CPIs, median TTD was longer in the 1st line setting (295 days, 95% CI 169 to 523; n=132) than when LOT > 1 (169 days, 95% CI 113 to 269; n=165), although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.092, log-rank test). No difference of TTD on TKIs was observed between LOT = 1 and LOT > 1 (P=0.51). With respect to tx sequencing, when patients (n=94) received TKIs as the 1st LOT, 60%, 35%, and 5% of them received another TKI, chemotherapy, or a CPI-containing regimen, respectively, as the 2nd LOT. Among patients (n=370) who progressed on 1st line platinum-based chemotherapy, 52%, 32%, and 16% received another chemo regimen, a CPI-containing regimen, or a targeted therapy, respectively, as the 2nd LOT; these percentages shifted significantly toward more CPIs (24%, 66%, 10% for chemo, CPI, targeted, respectively) when only 2016-2018 data were examined. In the 2nd line setting after platinum therapy, TTD was significantly longer in the CPI group (332 days, 95% CI 169-484) compared to the chemo group (88 days, 95% CI 65-100; P<0.0001), consistent with results from pivotal clinical trials. Conclusions: As the tx algorithm of aNSCLC has been evolving rapidly, we observed diverse tx patterns in RWD. Various tx sequences may impact patient outcomes, and therefore warrant further investigation.

Clinical activity of ipilimumab plus nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo) in patients (pts) with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 659-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby Gupta ◽  
Moshe Chaim Ornstein ◽  
Anita Gul ◽  
Kimberly D Allman ◽  
Jessica Ball ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clear Cell ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Response ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Experienced Grade

659 Background: Ipi/Nivo is a standard of care for pts with metastatic clear cell RCC. The clinical activity of Ipi/Nivo in patients with metastatic nccRCC remains poorly defined. Methods: Metastatic nccRCC pts who were treated with Ipi/Nivo at Cleveland Clinic or UT Southwestern were retrospectively reviewed. Ipi/Nivo was administered as per CHECKMATE 214. Computed tomography imaging was obtained at baseline and every12 weeks to assess disease response per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Baseline pt characteristics, outcome to therapy and adverse effects as per CTCAE v5.0 were collected. Results: Thirteen pts with metastatic nccRCC histology who were treated with Ipi/Nivo were identified. The median age was 60 years (range, 32-81). Non clear cell histologies included adenocarcinoma of renal origin not otherwise specified (2), unclassified (3), papillary (3), chromophobe (3), translocation (1) and medullary histology (1). Nine pts had ECOG PS 0; four pts had ECOG PS 1. Eleven patients were male and two female. IMDC risk group at time of initiation of Ipi/Nivo was favorable (2 pt), intermediate (10 pts) and poor (1 pt). Nine pts received Ipi/ Nivo as first line treatment, three pts received Ipi/Nivo after prior TKI and one pt received Ipi/ Nivo as third line treatment after prior chemotherapy and nivolumab monotherapy. In total, eight pts have thus far undergone restaging scans with three pts demonstrating partial response (PR), one pt demonstrating stable disease (SD) and four pts demonstrating progressive disease (PD). Two pts experienced grade 2 diarrhea, one after 4 cycles and another after 3 cycles of Ipi/Nivo and required prednisone. One pt demonstrated grade 3 hepatotoxicity after 2 cycles of Ipi/Nivo and required prednisone and Mycophenolate Mofetil while another pt demonstrated grade 1 hepatotoxicity after 3 cycles of Ipi/ Nivo requiring prednisone. One pt experienced grade 2 pancreatitis requiring steroids after one dose of Ipi/Nivo. One pt experienced grade 2 fatigue after 1 cycle of Ipi/Nivo requiring prednisone. Conclusions: Ipi/Nivo is feasible and safe in patients with metastatic nccRCC with preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. Updated clinical data will be presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document