Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors in mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) cancers: Looking for a needle in a haystack— But, joy on finding one.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14073-e14073
Author(s):  
Amit Rauthan ◽  
Poonam Patil ◽  
Tanvi Sood ◽  
Shriniwas Subhash Kulkarni ◽  
Nitin Yashas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair

e14073 Background: Pembrolizumab is approved for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) metastatic solid tumors with objective response rate (ORR) of 39.6% and response lasting for more than 6 months in 78% patients. Nivolumab is also approved in dMMR metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) with ORR of 28% and response lasting greater than 6 months in 67% patients. But finding these patients is difficult as only about 5% of metastatic cancers have dMMR. There is limited data from India in this population. We report our experience with testing and treatment in these patients. Methods: This is a single centre, retrospective study of metastatic solid tumors which had progressed on standard treatment. 137 patients were tested between May 2017 and Dec 2018. MMR testing was done by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The aim was to identify patients with dMMR; and to see their ORR, progression free survival (PFS) at 1 year, and adverse events on treatment with Nivolumab. Results: 137 metastatic cancer patients were tested. 75 had colorectal cancer (mCRC), 30 gastric, 10 hepatobiliary, 10 pancreatic, 8 endometrial, 2 small bowel cancer and 2 had breast cancer. 15 (11%) patients had dMMR. 3 (37%) of endometrium, 5 (16.6%) of stomach, 6 (8%) of mCRC and 1(10%) of hepatobiliary tree cancer had dMMR. 5 of the 15 dMMR patients received immunotherapy with Nivolumab - 2 in mCRC, 2 in stomach and 1 in endometrium. ORR was 60% with 3 partial responses, stable disease was seen in 1 (20%) and progression in 1 (20%). PFS at 1 year was 80%. Treatment was well tolerated.1 patient had hypothyroidism and 1 patient had grade 1 skin toxicity. Conclusions: Testing for dMMR is important in metastatic solid tumors as these patients are ideal for treatment with immunotherapy. But finding dMMR is difficult due to its infrequent presentation, and has been seen in 11% of our unselected patients. We recommend testing for dMMR by IHC in our Indian patients, as this is fast and cost effective. Finding dMMR cancers, and then treating with immunotherapy is rewarding irrespective of the site of origin. High ORR of 60% and 1 year PFS of 80% is very heartening to see in this relapsed metastatic patient group. Treating more dMMR patients and longer followup, will further elucidate the benefit of immunotherapy in our patients.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhui Jin ◽  
Xiaodan Zhu ◽  
Xiaona Huang ◽  
Tingjie Gong ◽  
Zhipeng Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 and/or CTLA-4 inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) by meta-analysis. Methods: Electronic databases were searched. Eligible studies included investigations of efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 agents in patients with CRC. Corresponding indicators were calculated. Results: A total of 15 articles were included. The pooled objective response rate, overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate and adverse event rate were 33, 56, 46 and 59%, respectively. The objective response rates for CRC with deficient mismatch repair and CRC with proficient mismatch repair were 43 and 3%, respectively, in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusion: The authors' study indicates that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors manifest promising clinical responses in the treatment of CRC with deficient mismatch repair with acceptable treatment-related adverse events.

scholarly journals KMT2A/C mutations function as a potential predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Hao-Xiang Wu ◽  
Ming Xu ◽  
Xiaoyan Xie
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Histone H3 Methylation

AbstractEpigenetic factors play important roles in tumor immunology. Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2 (KMT2) family genes exert histone H3 methylation, but its role in immunotherapy remains unclear. Our study is the first to investigate the correlation between KMT2 gene mutations and the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) treatment. We firstly collected a primary ICI-treated cohort (n = 546) and found that patients with KMT2A/C mutations yielded better prognosis in terms of progression-free survival (PFS, Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66, P = 0.002), objective response rate (ORR, 40.9% vs 20.3%, P < 0.001), durable clinical benefit (DCB, 48.3% vs 29.8%, P = 0.001) and overall survival (OS, HR = 0.70, P = 0.033). Furthermore, we validated the predictive potential of KMT2A/C mutations in an expanded ICI-treated cohort (n = 1395). KMT2A/C-mutant patients achieved better OS compared with KMT2A/C-wildtype patients (HR = 0.68, P = 0.003); and the survival advantages appeared in the majority of cancer subtypes. Our study suggests that KMT2A/C mutations function as a novel and potential predictive biomarker for ICI treatment in multiple solid tumors and the underlying mechanism is worth investigating.

scholarly journals The Lung Immune Prognostic Index Discriminates Survival Outcomes in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meyers ◽  
Stukalin ◽  
Vallerand ◽  
Lewinson ◽  
Suo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Tools ◽  
Tumor Types

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment landscape of several solid tumor types. However, as patient outcomes are heterogeneous, clinical tools to aid in prognostication are needed. The Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) correlates with outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICI, but its applicability beyond NSCLC is poorly defined. We sought to determine whether LIPI is associated with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in a pooled, real-world, retrospective cohort of patients with solid tumors treated with ICI. Of the total pooled cohort (N = 578), 47.2%, 38.2% and 14.5% of patients were stratified into good, intermediate and poor LIPI group, respectively. Median OS were 22.8 (95% CI 17.4–29.5), 7.8 (95% CI 6.6–9.6), and 2.5 months (95% CI 1.4–3.4) (p < 0.0001). Median PFS were 9.9 (95% CI 7.2–11.5), 3.6 (95% CI 2.7–4.3), and 1.4 months (95% CI 1.2–2.2) (p < 0.0001). ORR was also associated with LIPI group (p < 0.001). Intermediate and poor LIPI were independently prognostic of OS compared to good LIPI, with hazard ratios (HR) of 1.8 (95% CI 1.4–2.3, p < 0.001) and 3.6 (95% CI 2.5–5.1, p < 0.001), respectively. These data are the first to suggest that in a real-world setting, the prognostic value of LIPI may be tumor agnostic.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab for soft tissue sarcoma: a single institution retrospective review

Immunotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 1303-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie Zhou ◽  
Nam Bui ◽  
Shreyana Bolleddu ◽  
Marta Lohman ◽  
Hans-Christoph Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Response Evaluation Criteria

Aim: To analyze the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in soft tissue sarcoma. Materials & methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab. All patients who received at least one cycle were included. Results: One patient had a complete response and five had a partial response, for an objective response rate of 15%. Clinical benefit rate was 34% with a median duration of 12.0 months (range: 4.5 to 28.9+ months [mo]). Median overall survival was 12.0 months (95% CI: 4.5–23.7+ mo). Median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI: 2.3–4.5+ mo) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 and 2.9 months (2.5–6.0+ mo) by immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events of any grade were seen in 58% of patients, the most common being fatigue (21%) and cough (10%), 5% of patients experienced a grade 3 adverse event (AE) (hyperglycemia) or grade 4 AE (myocarditis). Conclusion: Ipilimumab/nivolumab combination showed efficacy and was well tolerated in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

scholarly journals Treatment with therapeutic anticoagulation is not associated with immunotherapy response in advanced cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Johannet ◽  
Amelia Sawyers ◽  
Nicholas Gulati ◽  
Douglas Donnelly ◽  
Samuel Kozloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Coagulation Cascade ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Endpoints

Abstract Background Recent preclinical data suggest that there may be therapeutic synergy between immune checkpoint blockade and inhibition of the coagulation cascade. Here, we investigate whether patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and were on concomitant anticoagulation (AC) experienced better treatment outcomes than individuals not on AC.Affiliation: Kindly confirm if corresponding authors affiliation is identified correctly.The corresponding author's affiliation is correct. Methods We studied a cohort of 728 advanced cancer patients who received 948 lines of ICI at NYU (2010–2020). Patients were classified based on whether they did (n = 120) or did not (n = 828) receive therapeutic AC at any point during their treatment with ICI. We investigated the relationship between AC status and multiple clinical endpoints including best overall response (BOR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of bleeding complications.Affiliations: Journal instruction requires a country for affiliations; however, this is missing in affiliations 1 to 5. Please verify if the provided country is correct and amend if necessary.The country is correct for all affiliations (1 - 5). Results Treatment with AC was not associated with significantly different BOR (P = 0.80), ORR (P =0.60), DCR (P =0.77), PFS (P = 0.59), or OS (P =0.64). Patients who received AC were significantly more likely to suffer a major or clinically relevant minor bleed (P = 0.05). Conclusion AC does not appear to impact the activity or efficacy of ICI in advanced cancer patients. On the basis of our findings, we caution that there is insufficient evidence to support prospectively evaluating the combination of AC and immunotherapy.

scholarly journals Letter to the Editor from Colle et al

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e002997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael Colle ◽  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Yves Menu
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Radiological Progression ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Early Tumor Shrinkage ◽  
Stopping Treatment ◽  
Early Tumor ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair

In their article, Fucà et al highlight that early tumor shrinkage and depth of response predict the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We are surprised that no cases of pseudoprogression (PSPD) were reported in their study. PSPDs were described under ICI in patients treated for MSI/dMMR mCRC. In a cohort of 123 patients treated with anti-PD1±antiCTL-4 for MSI/dMMR mCRC, we reported 12 patients with PSPD, representing 10% of the cohort. Of 12 patients with PSPD, 8 secondary achieved an objective response and were alive and free of progression at the data lock. Conversely, in Fucà’s article, no PSDP was observed and the patients with primary radiological progression (21.7%) had a poor overall survival. These differences between the two series could be probably explained by the following points. First, Fucà et al use RECIST 1.1 criteria for radiological evaluation. Second, the first imaging was done after 8–9 weeks of treatment in Fucà’s article, which may be late to detect PSPD. In conclusion, if the first evaluation is made during the first 3 months of treatment, using iRECIST criteria seems mandatory to avoid stopping treatment prematurely, especially in patients receiving anti-PD1 alone.

A phase 2 study of defactinib (VS-6063) in patients with NF2 altered tumors: Results from NCI-match (EAY131) subprotocol U.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3087-3087
Author(s):  
David Michael Jackman ◽  
Opeyemi Jegede ◽  
Marjorie Glass Zauderer ◽  
Edith P. Mitchell ◽  
James Zwiebel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Match Trial ◽  
Best Response

3087 Background: The NCI-MATCH trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on genetic alterations identified in tumor biopsies. Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)-inactivated tumors demonstrate increased sensitivity to FAK inhibition in preclinical models. Arm U evaluated the FAK inhibitor defactinib in pts with NF2 altered tumors. Methods: Patients found to harbor an inactivating NF2 mutation on NGS were assigned to the ARM U substudy MATCH. Defactinib 400 mg was given by mouth twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and 6-month PFS. Results: Of 5,548 cases with sufficient tissue for genomic analysis, 51 pts were found to have NF2 alterations (< 1% of the total analyzed). While NF2 alterations are known to occur more commonly in meningiomas and mesotheliomas, alterations were also detected in an array of other tumor types, including renal cell carcinomas and ovarian cancers. Thirty-five pts were ultimately enrolled; 33 patients were started on therapy, with 2 of those determined to be ineligible for outcome analysis. All pts had received at least one prior therapy, with 52% (16/31) having received 3 or more prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up was 35.9 months. ORR [90% CI] was 3% (1/31, [0.16, 14.86]), with the one partial response in a pt with choroid meningioma. Of the twelve pts whose best response was stable disease (39%, 12/31), 8 demonstrated some degree of tumor shrinkage (Table) with a disease control rate of 42% (13/31). Median PFS was 1.9 months for the 31 eligible pts who received study treatment, with median PFS of 9.3 months for the 9 patients who had a best response of stable disease or better. Six pts achieved a PFS of greater than 5.5 months. Among all treated pts (n=33), the most common treatment-related toxicities were fatigue (36%), nausea (33%), and hyperbilirubinemia (27%). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities; 27% of pts had grade 3 toxicities. No correlation could be made between clinical outcomes and tumor histology or specific NF2 genotype. Conclusions: Defactinib monotherapy had limited clinical activity in this cohort of previously treated patients with solid tumors exhibiting NF2 loss. Clinical trial information: NCT04439331. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Promising Immunotherapy in Metastatic Testicular Sex Cord Stromal Tumours After First-Line Chemotherapy

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingqing Shang ◽  
Chuanzhen Cao ◽  
Weixing Jiang ◽  
Hongzhe Shi ◽  
Xingang Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection ◽  
First Line ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

BackgroundTesticular sex cord stromal tumours (TSCSTs) are rare, with few studies focusing on the metastatic TSCST prognosis. The value of treatments, including radical orchiectomy (RO) and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), in preventing metastasis is controversial. Additionally, metastatic TSCSTs are resistant to chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in metastatic TSCSTs after first-line chemotherapy.MethodsWe retrospectively screened patients with testicular tumours undergoing testis surgery between January 2005 and January 2019. Patients with TSCSTs who had undergone testis-sparing surgery (TSS) or RO were identified. The malignant type was defined as metastasis confirmed by pathology. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety were analysed.ResultsAmong the 494 testicular tumour patients who received TSS or RO, 11 (2.2%) patients with histologically proven TSCSTs were identified. At the last follow-up, 7 patients survived without tumours, and 4 patients developed metastasis and received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, with 1 of them achieving an objective response. Their PFS times were 1.5, 2.2, 9.0, and 17.0 months, respectively. Two patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after developing chemotherapy resistance and achieved a partial response up to the last follow-up; one of them experienced Grade 1 adverse events, and the other experienced Grade 2 adverse events during immunotherapy. The median OS time of the 4 patients with metastatic TSCSTs was 32 months.ConclusionsTSCSTs are rare, and most are benign with a good prognosis. ICIs represent a promising option for improving clinical outcomes in metastatic TSCSTs.

Multidisciplinary approach for improvement of immunotherapy utilization in solid tumors with H MSI /dMMR –An action plan from a single oncology center

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Nagwa Ibrahim ◽  
Muneerah Alzouman ◽  
Abdulaziz Alhamad ◽  
Muneera AlMajed ◽  
Mohamed Almeziny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Oncology Center ◽  
Practice Patient

Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab are approved by Food and Drug Administration for patients diagnosed with metastatic solid tumors with high microsatellite instability (MSI) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR). The prognosis of these patients is generally poor, that is why it is very essential to identify the targeted patients who can benefit from immunotherapy. Pembrolizumab is approved in our institution for this indication. In order to ensure proper utilization of available resources, we decided to make a pilot retrospective review to evaluate pembrolizumab utilization, to identify the problems we are facing then to set an action plan through multidisciplinary approach. Based on the results we set recommendations. This paper is innovative and the first in kind. It could be used as guidance for other centers using immunotherapy and could be applied for other drugs as well to ensure best practice, patient safety and maximize utilization of resources.

Phase 1/2 study of eprenetapopt (APR-246) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumor malignancies.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3161-TPS3161
Author(s):  
Ecaterina Elena Dumbrava ◽  
Amit Mahipal ◽  
Xin Gao ◽  
Geoffrey Shapiro ◽  
Jason S. Starr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mononuclear Cells ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Growth Inhibition ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Peripheral Blood Mononuclear

TPS3161 Background: The p53 pathway has been implicated in antitumor immunity, including antigen presentation and T-cell proliferation. Loss of p53 function can increase resistance to immunotherapy across many tumor types. Eprenetapopt (eprenet) is a small molecule that stabilizes the folded structure of p53, resulting in activation of mutant p53 and stabilization of wild-type (WT) p53. It also targets the cellular redox homeostasis, resulting in induction of apoptosis in tumor cells. In vivo, mice carrying supernumerary copies of the TP53 gene harbor a pro-inflammatory tumor microenvironment, an effect recapitulated in TP53 normal-copy mice treated with eprenetapopt. Combining eprenetapopt and anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4 therapy resulted in enhanced tumor growth inhibition and improved survival in TP53 WT mice inoculated with B16 melanoma and MC38 colon adenocarcinoma cells . Based on these results, we hypothesized that eprenet-induced p53 stabilization may augment response to immunotherapy. To test this hypothesis, we are conducting a phase 1b/2 study of eprenet in combination with pembrolizumab (eprenet+pembro) in pts with solid tumors. Methods: The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to assess the safety and tolerability of eprenet+pembro in pts with advanced solid tumors. The secondary objectives are to estimate the anti-tumor activity and to describe the pharmacokinetics of the combination. Exploratory objectives include assessing predictive and pharmacodynamic markers of response. The study includes a safety lead-in with a 3+3 dose de-escalation design for pts with advanced solid tumors with known tumor TP53 mutation status ( TP53 WT is acceptable) (max 18 pts), followed by expansion cohorts in pts with NSCLC, gastric/GEJ and urothelial cancer (max 100 pts). In expansion, pts with urothelial and gastric cancers must be naïve to anti-PD-1/ L1 therapy. Eprenet is given IV once daily on Days 1–4 while pembro is administered on Day 3 of each 21-day cycle. The RP2D of eprenet+pembro is considered the dose at which ≤ 1 of 6 pts in a cohort has a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Primary endpoints are occurrence of DLTs, adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs with eprenet+pembro. Key secondary endpoints are best objective response, progression free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include gene mutations by next generation sequencing (including TP53), mRNA expression, multiplex immunohistochemistry and transcriptomics, multiplex flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cytokines in serum. Continuous monitoring of toxicity will be conducted. The trial opened in May 2020 and is actively enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04383938.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document