Treatment and outcome of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: Data from developing world.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18102-e18102
Author(s):  
Seema Gulia ◽  
Anne Srikanth ◽  
Dr Ketaki Adsul ◽  
Umesh Mahantshetty ◽  
Jaya Ghosh ◽  
...  

e18102 Background: To evaluate the clinicopathological factors, outcome and prognostics factors of uterine carcinosarcoma. Methods: All patients of uterine carcinosarcoma treated between January 2013 and December 2018 were identified and their clinical, laboratory and imaging details were retrieved from electronic medical record. Details of the treatment received, toxicity profile and outcome were recorded and analyzed. Patients (including stage I) were considered for four cycles of chemotherapy (Paclitaxel +Carboplatin) followed by radiation (EBRT to pelvis with vaginal brachytherapy). Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between treatment groups using the Log-rank test. Results: Of 81 cases, 48 % presented with early stage disease (FIGOI-II) and 52 % with late stage (FIGO III-IV) disease. Median age was 58 years (30-80 years). Most women (83%) were postmenopausal and 80% of them presented with postmenopausal bleeding. Six patients developed carcinosarcoma on adjuvant tamoxifen (given for breast cancer) after a median drug intake of 8 years. In early stage, 10% patients received only surgical treatment; 46% received both chemotherapy (CT) and radiation therapy (RT) while 33 % received RT alone. In advanced stage, 31% received only CT, 14 % received only RT and 33% received both CT and RT after surgery. About 8% of patients had myelosuppression(grade I/II), 10 % had peripheral neuropathy (grade I/II) and 11% had electrolyte imbalance. At a median follow up of 2 years (1- 80 months), median DFS and OS in early stage group was 28.5 months and 31.0 months while in advanced stage group it was 13.0 months and 15.0 months respectively. Distant metastasis (omentum, peritoneum and lung being the common site) were seen in 30% of patients while local relapse was seen in 5 % cases. On univariate analysis stage of disease and receipt of adjuvant therapy were the factors found to be significantly associated with improved OS (p < 0.001) and adjuvant RT alone was associated with improved DFS (p < 0.023). Conclusions: Adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy and or radiation therapy) is associated with improved overall survival in uterine carcinosarcoma, irrespective of stage at presentation.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (25) ◽  
pp. 6005-6015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Proctor ◽  
Jennifer Wilkinson ◽  
Gail Jones ◽  
Gillian C. Watson ◽  
Helen H. Lucraft ◽  
...  

Abstract The SHIELD program for Hodgkin lymphoma in patients 60 years of age or older, prospectively evaluated clinical features and outcome in a large patient cohort (n = 175). The central element was a phase 2 study of VEPEMB chemotherapy (n = 103, median age 73 years) incorporating comorbidity assessment. A total of 72 other patients were treated off-study but registered prospectively and treated concurrently with: ABVD (n = 35); CLVPP (n = 19), or other (n = 18). Of VEPEMB patients, 31 had early-stage disease (stage 1A/2A) and received VEPEMB 3 times plus radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 36 months. Complete remission (CR) rate (intention-to-treat) was 74% and 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 81% and 74%, respectively. A total of 72 patients had advanced-stage disease (stage 1B/2B/3 or 4) and received VEPEMB 6 times. CR rate was 61% with 3-year OS and PFS of 66% and 58%, respectively. Of patients achieving CR, 13% with early-stage and 5% with advanced-stage disease progressed. Overall treatment-related mortality was 7%. In patients treated with curative intent with VEPEMB, ABVD, and CLVPP (n = 157), CR linked to several factors in univariate analysis. In a Cox regression model only, obtaining CR remained significant for OS and CR plus comorbidity and age for PFS. RS-EBV status had no significant effect on outcome.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hutchinson ◽  
P. Bridge

AbstractPurposeTo establish whether the use of a passive or active technique of planning target volume (PTV) definition and treatment methods for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) deliver the most effective results. This literature review assesses the advantages and disadvantages in recent studies of each, while assessing the validity of the two approaches for planning and treatment.MethodsA systematic review of literature focusing on the planning and treatment of radiation therapy to NSCLC tumours. Different approaches which have been published in recent articles are subjected to critical appraisal in order to determine their relative efficacy.ResultsFree-breathing (FB) is the optimal method to perform planning scans for patients and departments, as it involves no significant increase in cost, workload or education. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) is the fastest form of delineation, however it is noted to be less accurate than the ten-phase overlap approach for computed tomography (CT). Although gating has proven to reduce margins and facilitate sparing of organs at risk, treatment times can be longer and planning time can be as much as 15 times higher for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This raises issues with patient comfort and stabilisation, impacting on the chance of geometric miss. Stereotactic treatments can take up to 3 hours to treat, along with increases in planning and treatment, as well as the additional hardware, software and training required.ConclusionFour-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) is superior to 3DCT, with the passive FB approach for PTV delineation and treatment optimal. Departments should use a combination of MIP with visual confirmation ensuring coverage for stage 1 disease. Stages 2–3 should be delineated using ten-phases overlaid. Stereotactic and gated treatments for early stage disease should be used accordingly; FB-IMRT is optimal for latter stage disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16209-e16209
Author(s):  
Fan Zhu ◽  
Haoyu Wang ◽  
Hani Ashamalla

e16209 Background: Hypothesis: Neoadjuvant SBRT can improve survival when compared to CFRT in PDAC patients who received chemotherapy. Past retrospective studies have shown improved outcomes of definitive SBRT when compared to CFRT without accounting for chemotherapy.1 We aim to study the outcomes of neoadjuvant SBRT vs CFRT accounting for chemotherapy. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for cases of PDAC from 2004-2015. Patients who received surgery and chemotherapy were included. Exclusion criteria were prior hormonal therapy or immunotherapy, lack of pathological confirmation or lack of information about chemotherapy. Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare survival by radiation modalities. Predictors for overall survival (OS) were identified. Propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis balancing for different variables including type of chemotherapy was conducted. Results: Among 1604 patients, 223 (13.9%) had SBRT, and 1381 (86.1%) had CFRT. The median survivals were 30.0 and 26.0 months ( P = 0.010), while the 2-year survival rates were 63.4% and 53.7% for SBRT and CFRT patients, respectively. SBRT tended to be offered to older patients (age≥65: 56.1% vs 47.3%, P = 0.018), healthier patients (CCI=0: 72.2% vs 63.6%, P = 0.016), patients with worse cT staging (cT3 and cT4: 80.7% vs 69.7%, P = 0.008) and patients who got more multi-agent chemotherapy (89.2% vs 50.5%, P < 0.001). In the cohort with positive clinical lymph nodes (cN+), CFRT tended to decrease the pN staging more when compared to SBRT ( P = 0.032) (Table). In multivariate analysis, multi-agent chemotherapy (HR, 0.72; P < 0.001) was associated with better OS. SBRT did not show significantly better OS when compared to CFRT (HR, 0.81; P = 0.13) after accounting for other covariates including chemotherapy. PSM (1:1 match) analysis matched 223 pairs. SBRT did not show significant OS benefit (HR, 0.80; P = 0.17) when compared to CFRT. Conclusions: SBRT may be superior to CFRT in univariate analysis. However, after accounting for multi-agent chemotherapy, there is no significant survival difference between neoadjuvant SBRT and CFRT. Studies with larger sample size are desired. Neoadjuvant CFRT offers more significant nodal down-staging in patients with clinically positive lymph nodes (cN+) when compared to SBRT. Reference: Zhong J, Patel K, Switchenko J, et al. Outcomes for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with stereotacticbody radiation therapy versus conventionally fractionated radiation. Cancer2017 Sep 15;123(18):3486-3493. pN staging of cN+ cohort[Table: see text]


2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 524-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Falcone ◽  
Adriana Romiti ◽  
Marco Filetti ◽  
Michela Roberto ◽  
Riccardo Righini ◽  
...  

Background: Because of a lack of large-scale prospective studies there is no clear indication about the management of patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA). This study evaluated clinical outcome of patients diagnosed with SBA at our institution. Methods: Clinicopathologic features, treatments, and clinical outcome of patients diagnosed with SBA between 2006 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Median time of survival was calculated and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression was used to test independence of significant factors in univariate analysis. Results: Forty patients were included in the study; the majority (82.5%) had a tumor in the duodenum (including ampulla of Vater) and an early stage disease at the diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) in the whole study population was 26.5 months. Patients with a tumor of the lower part of the small intestine (jejunum, ileum, and appendix) showed a better OS compared with that of patients with upper SBA (40 months vs 26 months, respectively; P=0.09). Primary tumor site and stage were independent predictors of OS. Conclusions: Our results suggest a prognostic role for the primary tumor site. This finding deserves to be further investigated to ensure better classification as well as more effective management strategies for SBA.


2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Oblak ◽  
Vaneja Velenik ◽  
Franc Anderluh ◽  
Barbara Mozina ◽  
Janja Ocvirk

Background. The aim of this study was to analyse whether the level of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP) 1 is associated with the tumour response and survival to preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer patients. Patients and methods. Ninety-two patients with histologically confirmed non-metastatic rectal cancer of clinical stage I- III were treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy, surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Plasma TIMP-1 concentrations were measured prior to the start of the treatment with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results. Median follow-up time was 68 months (range: 3-93 months) while in survivors it was 80 months (range: 68-93 months). The 5-year locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients were 80.2%, 56.4%, 63.7% and 52.2%, respectively. The median TIMP-1 level was 185 ng/mL (range: 22-523 ng/mL) and the mean level (±standard deviation) was 192 (±87) ng/mL. Serum TIMP-1 levels were found to be significantly increased in patients with preoperative CRP>12 mg/L and in those who died from rectal cancer or had cT4 tumours. No correlation was established for age, gender, carcinoembriogenic antigene (CEA) level, platelets count, histopathological grade, response to preoperative therapy, resectability and disease reappearance. On univariate analysis, various parameters favourably influenced one or more survival endpoints: TIMP-1 <170 ng/mL, CRP <12 mg/L, platelets count <290 10E9/L, CEA <3.4mg/L, age <69 years, male gender, early stage disease (cN0 and/or cT2-3), radical surgery (R0) and response to preoperative radiochemotherapy. In multivariate model, LRC was favourably influenced by N-downstage, DFS by lower CRP and N-downstage, DSS by lower CRP and N-downstage and OS by lower TIMP-1 level, lower CRP and N-downstage. Conclusions. Although we did not find any association between pretreatment serum TIMP-1 levels and primary tumour response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in our cohort of patients with rectal cancer, TIMP-1 levels were recognized as an independent prognostic factor for OS in these patients.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4447-4447
Author(s):  
Edilson D. Pinheiro-júnior ◽  
Elvira R.P. Velloso ◽  
Beatriz Beitler ◽  
Gracia A. Martinez ◽  
Monika Conchon ◽  
...  

Abstract ALL is an aggressive bone marrow neoplasm, mainly associated with a poor outcome in adult patients. The aim of this study is to describe clinical, laboratory and prognostic factors in 102 patients treated in one institutional department from 1990 to 2005, retrospectively. Adult ALL subtype L3 (FAB) or B-IV (EGIL) was excluded. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS 10.0.The association of features and prognosis was assessed by Pearson’s chi-square. OS and DFS curves were constructed by Kaplan-Meier method and the differences were analyzed by the log-rank test. Mean age was 30,6 (12 to 82) years and 55,9% was male. Clinical findings, at diagnosis, were fatigue (55,9%), splenomegaly (56,9%), hepatomegaly (54,6%), lymphadenopathy (52,6%), fever (38,8%), bone pain (28,6%), bleeding (27,5%) and headache (15,3%). Involvement of CNS was detected in 11(10,8%) patients and testicular involvement was observed in one patient. Cutaneous infiltration occurred in one patient immunophenotyping T-IV(group b). Kidney and pulmonary infiltration, documented by biopsy, was found in 2 and 1 patients respectively. At diagnosis; mean blood values were 8,5g/dl, 84.341/mm3 and 76.275/mm3 for hemoglobin, leukocytes and platelets respectively. 98,7% of the patients presented with lymphoblasts in peripheral blood. FAB classification was L1 and L2, 50% each. B and T-ALL was observed in 69,7% and 30,2% respectively. One case was identified as biphenotypic B and T leukemia. Karyotype analysis was performed in 40 cases, Ph chromosome was identified in 20% (8/40) of the cases. Others abnormalities were hyperdiploid karyotype (6/40); t(4;11) in 2 cases; t (1;19) and t(10;11) each one with 1 case. Patients were treated with different protocols: BFM 86 modified (BFM 86M) in 47,1% (48/102) of the patients, OPAL86 and OPAL87 protocols (Linker e cols) in 45,1% (46/102) and CHOP in 7,8% (8/102). Ten patients died in early induction phase and 70,6% (65/92) were in complete remission after induction treatment. Age less than 35 years (p=0.021), CNS not infiltrated (p= 0.022) and immunophenotyping B1 and B3 (p=0.018) were associated with a better induction response in a univariated analysis. The first two parameters were associated with a high probability of complete response (p=0.041 and 0.034, respectively) in a multivariate analysis. In a median follow up of 49 months, we have observed a four-years OS of 30,4% (median 19 months). Univariate analysis of OS showed that age less than 35 and mainly less than 18 years (p=0.01), absent bleeding and hepatomegaly at diagnosis (p=0.0022; p=0.029), early time to complete remission (p=0.0001) and treatment protocol BFM 86M (p=0.0034) were associated with better survival. In a multivariate analysis age >35y, presence of hepatomegaly or bleeding at diagnosis were associated with poor OS, and were used to created a prognosis score. Patients with none to one adverse factor have a significantly better survival than patients with more than one (p=0.0001). We have observed in our population a DFS of 27% in 4 years with a median DFS of 18,9 months. Only fever, at diagnosis, was an adverse factor related to DFS in univariate analysis (p=0.0057).


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8075-8075
Author(s):  
H. Yiu ◽  
R. K. Ngan ◽  
H. Cheng ◽  
K. Wong ◽  
M. Cheung ◽  
...  

8075 Background: Nasal NK/T lymphoma is uncommon but prognosis is universally poor even in early stage disease. Chemotherapy is often added to radiation for improving outcome although its role has not been well defined. Methods: Since 1998, an intensive protocol has been introduced for pts with stage I or II disease, which consists of 3 cycles of anthracycline-based (CHOP or ProMACE-CytaBOM) chemotherapy to be followed by cCRT (50–54Gy radiotherapy with weekly cisplatin at 40mg/m2) for pts with adequate renal function, and then consolidation HDCT. Cyclophosphamide, BCNU & Etoposide HDCT was offered to pts <60 years with adequate organ functions. Otherwise, 3 more cycles of conventional chemotherapy were given. Results: Out of the 27 pts recruited into the intensive protocol up till 2005, 23 completed cCRT & 14 received HDCT. Six pts had failed either locally or systemically, among whom 2 local failures were salvaged by further local radiotherapy. Eight patients had died with 4 related to lymphoma progression, 3 due to treatment complications and 1 died of prevailing medical illness. A preceding cohort of 35 pts intended to be treated with combined sequential conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy only (sCRT: n=35) from 1986 to 1997 was also analyzed and compared with the current cohort (cCRT: n=27). Pts in both groups had similar characteristics. The type of intended treatment was a statistically significant factor for 6-year failure-free survival (sCRT 22.9%, cCRT 65.9%; p=0.0049, log-rank test) and overall survival (sCRT 36.4%, cCRT 69.8%; p=0.05, log-rank test), so are B symptoms (present Vs absent) and stage (I Vs II). Conclusions: The intensive protocol with sequential brief induction conventional chemotherapy, cCRT, and consolidation HDCT / conventional chemotherapy in appropriate pts was feasible, leading to better outcome than the combination of sequential conventional chemotherapy and radiation alone. The relative contributions of cCRT and HDCT to the improved outcome should be further explored. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15585-e15585
Author(s):  
Megan Preston ◽  
Georgia Anne-Lee McCann ◽  
David M. O'Malley ◽  
Christina Boutsicaris ◽  
Larry J. Copeland ◽  
...  

e15585 Background: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) of the cervix comprise only 2% of all cervical cancers. As a result, prospective data is limited and treatment guidelines rely on literature from lung NEC. The objective of this study was to examine and report on our experience in the management of this rare, aggressive disease. Methods: This was an IRB-approved, single-institution, retrospective review. Study criteria included patients with cervical NEC diagnosed between 1990-2011. Demographic, treatment and survival data was collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of initial treatment until progression or death respectively, or date of last contact. Results: A total of 24 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age at diagnosis was 43. Median PFS was 13.6 months and median OS was 16.4 months. The majority of patients had advanced-stage disease (61% stage II-IV, 39% stage I). Of the 9 patients with stage I disease, 4 were treated with platinum + etoposide-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 5 were treated with initial radical surgery. Seven of the 9 patients had post-operative adjuvant therapy consisting of chemotherapy, chemo-radiation or radiation only. Seven of the 9 patients (78%) were alive at last follow-up. Of the two patients who were deceased, one had metastatic disease found at surgery and the other declined adjuvant therapy and died of recurrence. Patients with stage II-IV disease (n=15) had a median PFS and OS of 11.5 and 12.1 months, respectively. Only 2 had no evidence of disease at last encounter. The remainder died without achieving remission. Patients with metastatic disease had significantly worse survival when compared to those with loco-regional disease with a median OS of 8 vs. 28 months (p = .03), respectively. Conclusions: We report one of the largest single-institution experiences of neuroendocrine cervical cancer. Advanced-stage patients had a poor prognosis regardless of therapy. However, multi-modality therapy in early-stage disease resulted in an excellent prognosis (78% survival) for these rare, highly aggressive tumors. These findings support the goal of curative intent for early-stage disease using multi-modality therapy.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 345-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesna Mathew ◽  
Sasha Slipak ◽  
Anil Kotru ◽  
Joseph Blansfield ◽  
Nicole Woll ◽  
...  

345 Background: Multiple studies exist that validate the prognostic value of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging. However, none have established a survival benefit to the treatment recommendations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adherence to the BCLC guidelines at a rural tertiary care center, and to determine the effect of following the treatment recommendations on overall survival. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 97 patients newly diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from 2000 to 2012. The treatment choice was compared with the BCLC guidelines and percentage adherence calculated. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank test was used to test the difference between the two groups. Cox regression tests were used to determine independent effects of stage, treatment aggressiveness, and guideline adherence on survival. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of 97 patients, 75% (n=73) were male. Median overall survival was 12.9 months. In 59.8% (n=58) of the patients, treatment was adherent to stage specific guidelines proposed by the BCLC classification. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the adherent and non-adherent groups (11.2 vs 14.1 months, p<0.98). However on stage specific survival analysis, we noted a significant survival benefit for adherence to the guidelines for early stage HCC (27.9 vs 14.1 months, p<0.05), but a decrease in survival for adherence in the end stage (20 days vs 9.3 months, p<0.01). On univariate analysis, more aggressive treatment was associated with increased survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22 to 0.87; p = 0.018). Multivariate analysis revealed that adherence did not independently affect survival when stage and aggressiveness of treatment were included in the model (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.2, p = 0.34). Conclusions: Although the BCLC guidelines serve as a practical guide to the management of patients with HCC, they are not universally practiced. These results indicate that survival of patients with hepatocellular cancer is determined by stage and aggressiveness of treatment, not adherence to BCLC guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document