Efficacy of dose intensification in induction therapy for localized Ewing sarcoma: Italian Sarcoma Group (ISG) and Associazione Italiana Ematologia ed Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP) ISG/AIEOP EW-1 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11501-11501
Author(s):  
Roberto Luksch ◽  
Giuseppe Maria Milano ◽  
Francesco Barretta ◽  
Alessandra Longhi ◽  
Emanuela Palmerini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Poor Responders ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Type I ◽  
Tumour Site ◽  
Dose Intensification ◽  
The Impact

11501 Background: The role of dose intensification of chemotherapy in Ewing sarcoma (ES) is under evaluation in prospective trials. This is a controlled, randomized phase III study evaluating the impact on event-free survival (EFS) of two arms at different intensity of induction therapy in localized ES at onset. Methods: Newly diagnosed localized ES patients aged 2-40 were eligible. They were randomized to receive 4-courses induction therapy - 1 every 21 days - either with a standard arm (arm A) as per ISG/SSGIII protocol (Ferrari S, et at, Ann Oncol. 2011;22(5):1221) or with an intense arm B, consisting of vincristine 1,5mg/sqm+ doxorubicin 80mg/sqm+ifosfamide 9g/sqm for each course. After induction, patients underwent surgery and/or radiotherapy,followed by an adaptive treatment. Good responders received standard courses chemotherapy: arm A pts received 9 courses, while arm B pts received 5 courses. Poor responders in both arms received 4 courses followed by high-dose busulfan/melphalan+autologous stem cell rescue. The primary outcome measure was EFS for the 2 arms in the intention-to-treat population. Kaplan-Meier curves compared with log-rank test and Cox model were performed to assess differences between study arms. A secondary outcome was toxicity differences, assessed by means of the Fisher’s exact test. Initial sample size was 230 pts, type I error rate 5%, power 80%. Results: Between 2009 and 2019, 234 patients were randomized (arm A-115; arm B-119). M:F ratio was 1.8; median age 14 years (range 2-40); tumour site extremity in 55%, axial/pelvis in 45%; tumour volume < 200ml in 31% and ≥200ml in 69%. A good response was obtained in 56% in arm A and 60% in arm B. Median follow-up was 68 months. EFS was not significantly different between arms; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0,51-1,41, 5-year EFS (95% CI) was 73% (64-82%) in arm A and 75% (67-83%) in arm B ( p = 0.526). Good responders in arm A and in arm B and poor responders in arm B had comparable results: 5-year EFS (95% CI) was 80% (71-91%), 77% (67-88%), and 72% (59-86%), respectively, while poor responders in arm A showed a worse, not statistically significant (p = 0.164) performance (63%; 50-78%). Subgroup analyses showed similar outcome for age, tumour site and volume in both arms. Hematological, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular grade ≥3 toxicities were more pronounced in arm B (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Intense induction therapy with arm B did not improve 5-year EFS when compared with the standard arm A. The higher toxicity observed in arm B than in arm A was counterbalanced, in good responders, by a similar outcome with a shorter treatment plan. For poor responders, with almost 30 patients per arm event-free and with < 48-month FUP, better 5-year EFS in arm B than in arm A was observed but needs further observation. Clinical trial information: NCT02063022.

Preliminary Results of a Prospective Multicenter Phase III Trial Comparing High-Dose and Standard-Dose Daunorubicin for Induction of Complete Remission (CR) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1833-1833
Author(s):  
Je-Hwan Lee ◽  
Young-Don Joo ◽  
Jae-Hoo Park ◽  
Hun Mo Ryoo ◽  
Myung Soo Hyun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Group ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Dose Intensification ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Different Doses

Abstract The effectiveness of anthracycline dose intensification for induction of CR in AML has not been studied in a randomized fashion. We conducted a prospective randomized trial to compare the therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of two different doses of daunorubicin in combination with cytarabine in AML. This study began on August 2001 and 293 adult patients (younger than 60 years) with newly diagnosed AML except M3 have been enrolled. Fourteen patients were removed from the study and the remaining 279 patients were analyzed. After random assignments, 135 patients received standard-dose daunorubicin (SD-DN, 45 mg/m2/d × 3 d) and 144 patients received high-dose daunorubicin (HD-DN, 90 mg/m2/d × 3 d) in addition to cytarabine (200 mg/m2/d × 7 d) for induction of CR. Patients with persistent leukemia received the second attempt of induction chemotherapy, consisting of standard-dose daunorubicin (2 d) plus cytarabine (5 d). Patients who attained CR received 4 cycles of high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 × 6 doses) and 2 cycles of daunorubicin (1 d) plus cytarabine (5 d). For patients in intermediate- or high-risk cytogenetic groups, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation was performed if there was a suitable donor. CR was induced in 98 of 135 patients (72.6%) in SD-DN arm and 119 of 144 (82.6%) in HD-DN arm (P = 0.044). The impact of daunorubicin dose intensification on the CR rates were different by cytogenetic risk group: the CR rates for SD-DN vs. HD-DN arm were 24/25 (96.0%) vs. 35/36 (97.2%) for good-risk group, 63/88 (71.6%) vs. 64/83 (77.1%) for intermediate-risk group, and 10/20 (50.0%) vs. 19/24 (79.2%) for poor-risk group. With a median follow-up of 596 days for surviving patients, the 4-year probabilities of overall survival, disease-free survival, and relapse-free survival were similar between SD-DN and HD-DN arm. Two different doses of daunorubicin (SD-DN vs. HD-DN) showed similar toxicity profiles regarding recovery times from myelosuppression, transfusion requirements, severe toxicities (grades III to IV) classified by NCI-CTC ver 2.0 including cardiac toxicities, and duration of antibiotics administration. In conclusion, high-dose daunorubicin showed higher CR rates in AML patients of intermediate- and poor- cytogenetic risk groups without increase of toxicities compared to standard-dose daunorubicin.

Efficacy of add-on treosulfan and melphalan high-dose therapy in patients with high-risk metastatic Ewing sarcoma: Report from the International Ewing 2008R3 trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11501-11501
Author(s):  
Uta Dirksen ◽  
Vivek Bhadri ◽  
Bénédicte Brichard ◽  
Trude Butterfass-Bahloul ◽  
Sona Cyprova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Ewing Sarcoma ◽  
Adaptive Design ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Type I ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

11501 Background: Ewing 2008R3 (EudraCT2008-003658-13) was conducted in 12 countries. It evaluated the effect of treosulfan and melphalan high dose chemotherapy followed by re-infusion of autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HDTreoMel) on event-free (EFS, primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk Ewing Sarcoma (EwS). Methods: Phase III, open label, prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. Eligible patients (pts) had disseminated EwS with metastases to bone and/or other sites, excluding pts with only pleuropulmonary metastases. Pts received 6 cycles of VIDE induction and 8 cycles of VAC consolidation therapy. Patients were randomized to receive additional HDTreoMel chemotherapy or no further treatment (control), They were further stratified by number of bone metastases (1, 2-5, > 5). One-sided adaptive inverse-normal 4-stage design, changed after the 1st interim analysis via Müller-Schäfer method. Initial sample size 185 pts, type I error rate 2.5%, power 80%. Results: 109 pts were randomized between 2009 and 2018: 55 were randomized to HDTreoMel. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the primary endpoint EFS was not significantly different between HDTreoMel and control in the adaptive design (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.55-1.32, intention-to-treat). 3-year (3y) EFS was 20.9 % (95% CI 11.5-37.9%) in HDTreoMel and 19.2 % (95% CI 10.8-34.4%) in control pts. Results were similar in the per protocol collective. Subgroup analyses showed that independent of treatment, male patients had a worse outcome than female patients: 3y EFS 13.3% (95% CI 5.7-31.1%) vs 25.2% (95% CI 15.5-40.8%); p = 0.07. Patients aged < 14 had a better outcome when treated in the HDTreoMel group: 3y EFS 39.3% (95% CI 20.4-75.8%) vs 9% (95% CI 2.4-34%); p = 0.016; HR 0.40 (0.19-0.87). These effects were similar in the per protocol collective. Severe toxicities of hematology, gut, general condition and infection were more pronounced in the HDTreoMel group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In patients with very high risk EwS, additional HDTreoMel was of no benefit for the entire cohort of patients. HDTreoMel may be of benefit for children age < 14. This observation is supported by comparable results from a non-randomized trial EE99 R3 (Ladenstein et al. JCO, 2010). Clinical trial information: NCT00987636 .

Triple therapy in uncontrolled asthma: a network meta-analysis of Phase III studies

2021 ◽  
pp. 2004233
Author(s):  
Paola Rogliani ◽  
Beatrice Ludovica Ritondo ◽  
Luigino Calzetta
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Exacerbation ◽  
Triple Combination ◽  
Combination Therapies ◽  
Uncontrolled Asthma ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
The Impact

Conflicting evidence is currently available concerning the impact on asthma exacerbation of triple inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting β2-adrenoceptor agonist (LABA), and long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (LAMA) fixed-dose combination (FDC). Since meta-analyses allow settling controversies of apparently inconsistent results, we performed a network meta-analysis of Phase III randomised controlled trials including 9535 patients to assess the effect of ICS/LABA/LAMA combinations in uncontrolled asthma. Triple combination therapies with an ICS administered at high dose (HD) were more effective (p<0.05) than medium dose (MD) ICS/LABA/LAMA FDC and both MD and HD ICS/LABA FDCs against moderate to severe exacerbation (relative risk [RR] from 0.61 to 0.80) and increasing trough forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (mL from +33 to +114). Triple combination therapies including HD ICS were superior (p<0.05) than MD ICS/LABA/LAMA FDC in preventing severe exacerbation (RR from 0.46 to 0.65), but not with respect to moderate exacerbation (p>0.05). Triple combination therapies were equally effective on asthma control, with no safety concerns. This quantitative synthesis suggests that ICS/LABA/LAMA FDCs are effective and safe in uncontrolled asthma, and that the dose of ICS in the combination represents the discriminating factor to treat patients with a history of moderate or severe exacerbation.

scholarly journals Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Progressive Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated With 177Lu-Dotatate in the Phase III NETTER-1 Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (25) ◽  
pp. 2578-2584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Strosberg ◽  
Edward Wolin ◽  
Beth Chasen ◽  
Matthew Kulke ◽  
David Bushnell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Health Related Qol ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) progression is associated with deterioration in quality of life (QoL). We assessed the impact of 177Lu-Dotatate treatment on time to deterioration in health-related QoL. Methods The NETTER-1 trial is an international phase III study in patients with midgut NETs. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 177Lu-Dotatate versus high-dose octreotide. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaires QLQ C-30 and G.I.NET-21 were assessed during the trial to determine the impact of treatment on health-related QoL. Patients completed the questionnaires at baseline and every 12 weeks until tumor progression. QoL scores were converted to a 100-point scale according to European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer instructions, and individual changes from baseline scores were assessed. Time to QoL deterioration (TTD) was defined as the time from random assignment to the first QoL deterioration ≥ 10 points for each patient in the corresponding domain scale. All analyses were conducted on the intention-to-treat population. Patients with no deterioration were censored at the last QoL assessment date. Results TTD was significantly longer in the 177Lu-Dotatate arm (n = 117) versus the control arm (n = 114) for the following domains: global health status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.406), physical functioning (HR, 0.518), role functioning (HR, 0.580), fatigue (HR, 0.621), pain (HR, 0.566), diarrhea (HR, 0.473), disease-related worries (HR, 0.572), and body image (HR, 0.425). Differences in median TTD were clinically significant in several domains: 28.8 months versus 6.1 months for global health status, and 25.2 months versus 11.5 months for physical functioning. Conclusion This analysis from the NETTER-1 phase III study demonstrates that, in addition to improving progression-free survival, 177Lu-Dotatate provides a significant QoL benefit for patients with progressive midgut NETs compared with high-dose octreotide.

scholarly journals 55. A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER PHASE III TRIAL OF SURGERY PLUS STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY (SRS) COMPARED WITH SURGERY PLUS PERMANENTLY IMPLANTED COLLAGEN TILE BRACHYTHERAPY (CTBT) FOR RESECTABLE METASTATIC BRAIN TUMORS-PROTOCOL IN PROGRESS

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii11-ii11
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Weinberg ◽  
Mary Frances McAleer ◽  
Hussein Tawbi ◽  
Frederick Lang
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Word Association ◽  
Verbal Learning ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
Metastatic Brain Tumors ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BACKGROUND Resection (R) followed by single or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) lowers resection bed recurrence compared to R alone. Nevertheless for larger brain metastasis (&gt;2.5 cm) 12-month recurrence rates after R+SRS can exceed 20–30%. Aiming to improve outcomes, a permanently implanted collagen tile brachytherapy (CTBT) device (GammaTile, GT Medical Technologies, Tempe AZ) utilizing Cs-131 was developed, hypothesizing that immediate adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and/or RT dose intensification could improve outcomes. The device received FDA clearance for this indication, based on a single-arm pre-commercial study and in early commercial use due to the excellent safety and local control of R+CTBT. It is hypothesized that R+CTBT will increase the time to post-resection-recurrence, while prolonging survival and reducing the impact on functional and neurocognitive status compared to R+SRS. STUDY DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, comparison trial. Patients with resectable, previously untreated “index” brain metastases measuring &gt;2.5–5 cm and 0–3 other tumors will be preoperatively randomized 1:1 to undergo either R+ SRS or R+CTBT to the index lesion; unresected tumors in both groups will receive SRS. Planned sample size is 160 from ~5 sites; accrual to start in Q3-2020. Primary endpoint is surgical bed-recurrence free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain, Linear Analog Self-Assessment), neurocognition (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, Trail Making Tests, Mini-Mental Status Exam, Controlled Oral Word Association), functional decline (Karnofsky Performance Scale, Barthel-ADL), and adverse events. Follow-up will be at 1,3,6,9, and 12 months, then q 6 months through 5 years. CONCLUSIONS This will be the first randomized trial comparing R+SRS versus R+CTBT delivered by Cs-131 sources in permanently implanted resorbable collagen tile carriers. Primary and secondary outcome measures will be captured to elucidate the potential risks and benefits of these two differing approaches for patients with metastatic brain tumors.

scholarly journals TROG 18.01 phase III randomised clinical trial of the Novel Integration of New prostate radiation schedules with adJuvant Androgen deprivation: NINJA study protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e030731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarad Martin ◽  
Paul Keall ◽  
Shankar Siva ◽  
Peter Greer ◽  
David Christie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Initial Portion ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive alternative to surgery for the treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer (PC). The objectives of the Novel Integration ofNew prostate radiation schedules with adJuvant Androgen deprivation (NINJA) clinical trial are to compare two emerging SBRT regimens for efficacy with technical substudies focussing on MRI only planning and the use of knowledge-based planning (KBP) to assess radiotherapy plan quality.Methods and analysisEligible patients must have biopsy-proven unfavourable intermediate or favourable high-risk PC, have an Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 and provide written informed consent. All patients will receive 6 months in total of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients will be randomised to one of two SBRT regimens. The first will be 40 Gy in five fractions given on alternating days (SBRT monotherapy). The second will be 20 Gy in two fractions given 1 week apart followed 2 weeks later by 36 Gy in 12 fractions given five times per week (virtual high-dose rate boost (HDRB)). The primary efficacy outcome will be biochemical clinical control at 5 years. Secondary endpoints for the initial portion of NINJA look at the transition of centres towards MRI only planning and the impact of KBP on real-time (RT) plan assessment. The first 150 men will demonstrate accrual feasibility as well as addressing the KBP and MRI planning aims, prior to proceeding with total accrual to 472 patients as a phase III randomised controlled trial.Ethics and disseminationNINJA is a multicentre cooperative clinical trial comparing two SBRT regimens for men with PC. It builds on promising results from several single-armed studies, and explores radiation dose escalation in the Virtual HDRB arm. The initial component includes novel technical elements, and will form an important platform set for a definitive phase III study.Trial registration numberANZCTN 12615000223538.

scholarly journals The Impact of Rehabilitation-oriented Virtual Reality Device in Patients With Ischemic Stroke in the Early Subacute Recovery Phase: Study Protocol for a Phase III, Single-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117957351989947
Author(s):  
Nima Ahmed ◽  
Vitor A Queiroz Mauad ◽  
Olga Gomez-Rojas ◽  
Ammu Sushea ◽  
Gelanys Castro-Tejada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
The United States ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Be The Change

Background and rationale: Stroke is considered the most common cause of adult disability. Intensive rehabilitation protocols outperform nonintensive counterparts. The subacute stroke phase represents a potential window to recovery. Virtual reality (VR) has been shown to provide a more stimulating environment, allowing for increased patient compliance. However, the quality of current literature comparing VR with standard therapies is limited. Our aim is to measure the impact of VR versus standard therapy on the recovery of the upper limb motor function in patients with stroke in the early subacute recovery phase. Method: This is a randomized, controlled trial that will assign 262 patients to tailor-made standard rehabilitation (TMSR) or TMSR plus immersive VR device. The trial will be conducted in an urban rehabilitation clinic in the United States with expertise in the management of poststroke patients. Patients will be 18 to 70 years of age and in the early subacute period (30-90 days post ischemic stroke). The primary outcome will be the change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment—Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score, measured at baseline and 13 weeks after randomization. The secondary outcome will be the change in the UK Functional Independence Measure and Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM-FAM) score at the same time points. Discussion: If the use of VR in the rehabilitation of patients with stroke proves to have a significant impact on their motor recovery, it will constitute an extremely important step into decreasing the functional impairment associated with stroke and the related health care expense burden.

Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone as Primary Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Significantly Decreases Bone Resorption While Sparing Bone Formation as Compared to Thalidomide-Dexamethasone

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5117-5117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Tosi ◽  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
Giulia Perrone ◽  
Michela Ceccolini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Bone Resorption ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Bone Formation Markers

Abstract Bone disease occurs in approximately 80% of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) and is caused by the interaction of the neoplastic clone with bone marrow microenvironment, ultimately resulting in an altered balance between bone resorption and bone formation. It has been previously reported that therapies aimed at eradicating the myeloma clone could contribute to decrease bone resorption, even though bone formation remains impaired even in responding patients, due to the use of high-dose steroids. It has been recently demonstrated, both in vitro and in animal models, that Bortezomib improves bone formation by stimulating osteoblasts. In order to test whether this activity was retained also in vivo, we evaluated markers of bone resorption (serum crosslaps) and bone formation (serum osteocalcin-OC and bone alkaline phosphatase - BAP) in a series of patients who were enrolled in the “Bologna 2005” phase III clinical trial at our Center. By study design, after registration patients were randomized to receive three 21-days courses of induction therapy with either VTD (Bortezomib, 1.3 mg/sqm on d 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus Dexamethasone, 40 mg on each day of and after Bortezomib administration plus Thalidomide 200 mg/d from d 1 to 63.) or TD (Thalidomide as in VTD and Dexamethasone 40 mg/d on d 1–4 and 9–12 of every 21-d cycle), prior to stem cell collection and double autologous stem cell transplantation. As of January 2008, 27 patients (19 male and 8 female, median age = 57.5 yrs) entered the sub-study; of these, 15 and 12 patients were randomized in the VTD and TD arm, respectively. At diagnosis, both groups of patients showed a marked increase in serum crosslaps as compared to upper baseline limit (7321±1445pmol/L in the VTD arm and 11140±2576pmol/L in the TD arm) while both OC and BAP were reduced as compared to lower baseline limits. After completion of the induction therapy, serum crosslaps were significantly decreased in both treatment groups (2747±319pmol/L in VTD arm, p=0.007; 3686±1084pmol/L in the TD arm, p=0.0015). In the TD group a significant further reduction in bone formation markers was also observed (42% reduction in serum OC and 30% in BAP, p=0.03 and 0.04 as compared to pre-treatment values); on the contrary, in the VTD arm both OC and BAP were not significantly decreased as compared to baseline values (15% and 11% for OC and BAP, respectively). These data suggest that incorporation of Bortezomib into induction therapy counteracts the inhibitory effects of high-dose steroids on osteoblastogenesis, thus sparing bone formation.

Cytogenetic, Molecular and Clinical Features Associated with Rare CBFB-MYH11 Fusion Transcripts in Patients (Pts) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and inv(16)/t(16;16)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2514-2514
Author(s):  
Colin G Edwards ◽  
Kati Maharry ◽  
Krzysztof Mrózek ◽  
Sebastian Schwind ◽  
Peter Paschka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Fusion Transcript ◽  
Type A ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Type I ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Kit Mutation ◽  
Fusion Transcripts ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2514 Approximately 8% of de novo AML pts have inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22) [inv(16)] and this cytogenetic group is associated with high complete remission (CR) rates and a relatively favorable outcome after cytarabine/daunorubicin (ara-c/dnr)-based induction and high-dose ara-c (HiDAC) consolidation therapy. However, ∼40% of these pts still relapse. The molecular mechanisms that impact on the prognosis of inv(16) pts remain to be fully elucidated. We and others reported that presence of the mutated KIT (mutKIT) gene is associated with worse outcome, but other contributing factors may play a role. Molecularly, inv(16) results in disruption of the MYH11 gene at 16p13 and CBFB gene at 16q22, creating a CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene. Since the genomic breakpoints within CBFB and MYH11 are variable and the fusion transcripts depend on the exons fused, at least 11 different sized CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcript variants have been found. The frequency of each fusion varies, with ∼85% being type A and ∼5% each types D and E; types B, C, and F-K were reported in single cases (hereafter we refer to non-type A fusions as “rare”). To our knowledge, only one study (Schnittger et al. Leukemia 2007;21:725) has examined the biological and clinical significance of rare CBFB-MYH11 fusions in AML. Fusion type was not found to be prognostic, but the cohort included pts with therapy-related and secondary AML. Thus, further studies are warranted. Accordingly, we analyzed 149 de novo CBFB-MYH11 positive AML pts aged <60 years (y; median, 40 y; range 18–59) receiving ara-c/dnr-based induction and HiDAC consolidation therapy (Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocols 9621, 19808, 10503). Among 149 pts, 129 (87%) had type A fusion, 17 (11%) type E, 2 (1%) type D, and 1 (<1%) type I. Pts with rare fusions had lower white blood cell counts (P=.02; median, 18.9 v 27.5 ×109/L), less often skin infiltration (P=.04; 0% v 18%) and tended to have FAB subtype M4Eo less often than the type A fusion pts (P=.13; 67% v 85%). Eighteen rare and 100 type A fusion pts had at least 1.7 y follow-up and thus could be analyzed for outcome. No significant differences in CR rates (P=1.00; 94% v 92%), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; P=.16; 5 y rates, 30% v 47%) or overall survival (OS; P=.30; 5 y rates, 78% v 60%) were found between rare and type A fusion pts. However, a trend toward longer event-free survival (EFS) was observed for rare fusion pts compared with type A pts (P=.07; 5 y rates, 66% v 42%; Figure). In an analysis of secondary cytogenetic abnormalities (abns) we found trisomies 8, 13 and 21 were more frequent in rare fusion pts than in type A pts (P=.03; P=.07; P<.001, respectively). Of the rare fusion pts, 44% had at least one of +8, +13 or +21 compared to only 11% of the type A pts. No rare fusion transcript pt harbored +22, which was present in 24 (19%) pts with type A fusion (P=.05; Table]. Strikingly, no rare fusion pt had mutKIT compared with 29% of type A fusion pts (P=.01). Given that +22 has been associated with improved and mutKIT with worse outcome, we also assessed the impact of fusion transcript type by restricting our analysis first to pts with no +22, then to pts without mutKIT, and finally excluding both +22 and mutKIT. No significant differences in CR rates, CIR, OS or EFS were observed between the two groups. We conclude that the type of fusion transcript does not appear to affect significantly the prognosis of inv(16) pts, although a favorable trend for pts with the rare transcript exists. Type A and rare fusion pts differ with regard to distribution of accompanying genetic or cytogenetic alterations, such as KIT mutation or +22, which did not occur in any of the rare fusion pts. Further studies are required to elucidate if the rare fusion transcripts themselves created the necessary biologic conditions that exclude the concurrent presence of the genome aberrations.Table.Secondary abns in pts with rare v type A fusionsAbn type*Rare fusion (n=20†) No. pts (%)Type A fusion (n=129) No. pts (%)P‡None [sole inv(16)]8 (44)81 (63).20+220 (0)24 (19).05+85 (28)11 (9).03+215 (28)2 (2)<.001+132 (11)2 (2).07At least one +8 or +13 or +218 (44)14 (11).001del(7q)/add(7q)0 (0)7 (5).60Other2 (11)11 (9).66*Pts may have multiple secondary abns.†2 unknown.‡Fisher's exact test. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document