A phase II evaluation of pembrolizumab in recurrent microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) endometrial cancer patients with Lynch-like versus MLH-1 methylated characteristics (NCT02899793).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5523-5523
Author(s):  
Dana M Roque ◽  
Stefania Bellone ◽  
Eric R. Siegel ◽  
Natalia Buza ◽  
Elena Bonazzoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Antigen Processing ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden ◽  
Grade 3

5523 Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI-H) is a biomarker for response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, these neoplasms are heterogenous including Lynch (germline), Lynch-like (somatic) and sporadic ( MLH1-methylated) tumors. Whether mechanisms underlying MSI alter responses to ICIs is unclear. We report data from a phase II pilot study (NCT02899793) of pembrolizumab in recurrent MSI-H endometrial cancer (EC) patients and potential mechanisms of primary/secondary ICI resistance. Methods: Patients with measurable, MSI-H EC confirmed by immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction were evaluated by next-generation sequencing and received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 2 years. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Results: Twenty-five patients (24 evaluable) were treated. Six (25%) patients harbored Lynch/Lynch-like tumors while 18 (75%) had sporadic EC. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was higher in Lynch-like (median 2939, IQR:867-5108) versus sporadic tumors (median 604, IQR:411-798) ( P= 0.0076). Median follow-up was 25.8 months with an ORR of 58% (95% CI, 36.6-77.9%). ORR was 100% in Lynch/Lynch-like patients but only 44% in sporadic patients ( P= 0.024). The 3-year progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) proportions were 100% versus 30% ( P= 0.017) and 100% versus 43% ( P= 0.043), respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (6.8%) occurred in 12 patients. Defective antigen processing/presentation and deranged induction in interferon responses served as mechanisms of resistance in sporadic MSI-H EC. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated prognostic significance of Lynch-like versus sporadic MSI-H EC on ORR, PFS and OS when treated with pembrolizumab. Clinical studies evaluating separate subtypes of MSI-H EC treated with ICIs are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02899793.

scholarly journals Antigen presentation and tumor immunogenicity in cancer immunotherapy response prediction

eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shixiang Wang ◽  
Zaoke He ◽  
Xuan Wang ◽  
Huimin Li ◽  
Xue-Song Liu
Keyword(s):  
Antigen Presentation ◽  
Antigen Processing ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Response Prediction ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden ◽  
Tumor Immunogenicity ◽  
Improved Performance ◽  
Pan Cancer

Immunotherapy, represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), is transforming the treatment of cancer. However, only a small percentage of patients show response to ICI, and there is an unmet need for biomarkers that will identify patients who are more likely to respond to immunotherapy. The fundamental basis for ICI response is the immunogenicity of a tumor, which is primarily determined by tumor antigenicity and antigen presentation efficiency. Here, we propose a method to measure tumor immunogenicity score (TIGS), which combines tumor mutational burden (TMB) and an expression signature of the antigen processing and presenting machinery (APM). In both correlation with pan-cancer ICI objective response rates (ORR) and ICI clinical response prediction for individual patients, TIGS consistently showed improved performance compared to TMB and other known prediction biomarkers for ICI response. This study suggests that TIGS is an effective tumor-inherent biomarker for ICI-response prediction.

Phase II Study of Sorafenib in Patients With Sunitinib-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (27) ◽  
pp. 4469-4474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Di Lorenzo ◽  
Giacomo Cartenì ◽  
Riccardo Autorino ◽  
Gianni Bruni ◽  
Marianna Tudini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose No previous prospective trials have been reported with sorafenib in patients with sunitinib-refractory metastatic renal cell cancer (MRCC). We conducted a multicenter study to determine the activity and tolerability of sorafenib as second-line therapy after sunitinib progression in MRCC. Patients and Methods Between January 2006 and September 2008, 52 patients were enrolled onto this single-arm phase II study. All patients received sorafenib 400 mg orally twice a day until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (complete or partial response) evaluated every 8 weeks by use of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; secondary end points were toxicity, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Results All patients were included in response and safety analyses. Partial responses were observed in 9.6% of patients (five of 52 patients; 95% CI, 5% to 17%) after two cycles. Grade 1 to 2 fatigue, diarrhea, nausea/vomiting, rash, and neutropenia were the most common side effects, noted in 16 (30.8%), 19 (36.5%), 20 (38.5%), 19 (36.5%), and 20 patients (38.5%), respectively. The most common grade 3 toxicity was diarrhea, noted in six patients (11.5%). Median TTP was 16 weeks (range, 8 to 40 weeks), and median OS was 32 weeks (range, 16 to 64 weeks). Conclusion Although well tolerated, sorafenib shows limited efficacy in sunitinib-refractory MRCC. Further randomized trials comparing sorafenib with other drugs that target different biologic pathways are needed to define the best second-line treatment option in these patients.

scholarly journals Abiraterone in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: principal results of the phase II Cancer of the Ovary Abiraterone (CORAL) trial (CRUK – A16037)

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592097535
Author(s):  
Susana Banerjee ◽  
Holly Tovey ◽  
Rebecca Bowen ◽  
Elizabeth Folkerd ◽  
Lucy Kilburn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Background: Recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains difficult to treat, with an urgent need for more therapy options. Androgens bind to the androgen receptor (AR), commonly expressed in EOC. CYP17 inhibitor abiraterone irreversibly inhibits androgen biosynthesis. The Cancer of the Ovary Abiraterone (CORAL) trial was designed to evaluate the clinical activity of abiraterone in EOC. Patients & Methods: CORAL was a multi-centre, open-label, non-randomised, 2-stage phase II clinical trial. Eligible patients had progression within 12 months of last systemic therapy and no prior hormonal anti-cancer agents. Patients received abiraterone 1000 mg daily plus 5 mg prednisone until progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to combined Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours/Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup (RECIST/GCIG) criteria at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 12 weeks. Results: A total of 42 patients were recruited; median age 65 (range 34–85) years; 37 (88.1%) had high-grade serous tumours; 20 (48%) had at least three prior lines of therapy; 29/40 (72.5%) were AR+. In stage 1, 1/26 response was observed (in an AR+, low-grade serous EOC); response lasted 47 weeks. Overall, 12 week ORR was 1/42 (2%), CBR was 11/42 (26%) (8/29 (28%) in AR+ patients). Disease control was ⩾6 months for 4/29 (14%). One patient (AR+, low-grade serous) had a RECIST response at 82 weeks. Four (10%) had grade ⩾3 hypokalaemia; 11 (26%) had dose delays. Conclusions: CORAL represents the first trial of an AR targeted agent in ovarian cancer. While responses were rare, a subset of patients achieved sustained clinical benefit. Targeting AR in EOC including low-grade serous cancer warrants further investigation. Trial registration: CORAL is registered on the ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN63407050; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN63407050

bTMB-High Basket trial: A multicenter phase II trial of nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers with high blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS179-TPS179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki Nakamura ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Hideaki Bando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Mutational Burden ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden ◽  
Basket Trial ◽  
Disease Specific

TPS179 Background: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is an emerging biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been reported to effectively identify patients likely to respond to ICIs by effectively and non-invasively evaluating the TMB in the tumor in NSCLC and gastric cancer. Methods: We are conducting an investigator-initiated multicenter phase II basket trial to investigate efficacy and safety of nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers with high bTMB identified by ctDNA analysis as part of the Nationwide Cancer Genome Screening Project (SCRUM-Japan GI-SCREEN). Eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed unresectable or recurrent GI malignancies; ECOG PS of 0 or 1; refractory or intolerant to the standard therapies; and high bTMB identified by a 73-gene sequencing ctDNA panel (Guardant360) regardless of microsatellite instability status. Patients will be enrolled into one of four disease-specific cohorts (colorectal, gastric, esophageal, and other GI cancer cohort), and receive intravenous nivolumab monotherapy of 360 mg every 3 weeks. The bTMB score is calculated by adjustment of mutation count by tumor fraction, and tentative bTMB level cut-offs were determined according to objective response rate (ORR) reported for ICI treatment for each tumor subtype in previous trials. The trial will utilize a two-stage design with a Bayesian hierarchical model, and tentative bTMB level cut-off will be re-assessed in the first stage. Primary endpoint in each stage is the disease control rate at 6 week and the ORR assessed by investigators per RECIST v1.1, respectively. Target sample size is determined as 70 in total so that the statistical power in each disease-specific cohort calculated based on a Bayesian posterior distribution attains 70 to 80% with one-sided alpha level in each cohort of approximately 10%. For biomarker analysis, tumor tissue and ctDNA will be serially collected and analyzed by whole-exome, transcriptome, and T cell receptor sequencing. This trial was initiated since September 2018. Clinical trial information: UMIN000033182.

A phase II trial of regorafenib for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) following prior chemotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 498-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gurudatta Naik ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Lisle Nabell ◽  
Mollie R. De Shazo ◽  
Lakshminarayanan Nandagopal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

498 Background: Salvage therapy options for aUC following platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have modest activity. Regorafenib is a multitargeted TKI that targets VEGF and Tie2 receptors among others, which is approved for multiple malignancies. Both VEGF and Tie2 inhibitors have preliminarily exhibited activity in aUC. Hence, a rationale was made to evaluate regorafenib in aUC progressing following chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a single arm, non-randomized Phase II study (NCT02459119) of regorafenib for aUC following chemotherapy. All patients (pts) started at 120 mg po qd for one cycle (28 days) before escalating to 160 mg po qd in the absence of intolerable regorafenib related toxicities. Pts who had progressed after 1-3 prior chemotherapy regimens and exhibited measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 were selected. The primary objectives was progression free survival at 6 months (PFS-6) and the secondary objectives were objective response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. PFS6 of ≥20% was considered of interest and the target accrual was 32 evaluable pts. The treatment was continued until progression or intolerable adverse events. Results: We enrolled 17 pts across 3 institutions (UAB, Wayne State and Cleveland Clinic) between May 2015 and May 2019. Of these, 14 patients were male (82%) and the median age was 67 years. Pts received a median of 2 prior therapies including chemotherapy. 9 pts had received a prior ICI. 13 pts (76.5%) experienced treatment related adverse events (AE), and 7 pts (41.2%) had grade 3 toxicities including–anemia, thrombocytopenia, myalgia, hypophosphatemia, abdominal pain and fatigue. Treatment was discontinued for patients who suffered grade 3 myalgia and abdominal pain. There were no treatment related deaths. 3 patients attained PFS6 (18%) who also displayed minor regressions and 1 of them had received a prior ICI. Conclusions: Although the trial was halted for slow accrual, regorafenib appeared to demonstrate activity in heavily pretreated pts with aUC who had received chemotherapy or ICI. Further evaluation may be warranted in less heavily pretreated pts and in combination with rational agents with non-overlapping toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT02459119.

scholarly journals Adrenal gland as a sanctuary site for immunotherapy in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e001903
Author(s):  
Romain Cohen ◽  
Vincent Jonchère ◽  
Christelle De La Fouchardière ◽  
Toky Ratovomanana ◽  
Quentin Letourneur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adrenal Gland ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Antigen Presentation ◽  
Adrenal Glands ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Presentation Pathway ◽  
Significant Impairment

Metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRC) harboring microsatellite instability (MSI) are sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs remain unclear. Dissociated responses in patients with ICI-treated cancer suggest that certain organs may serve as sanctuary sites due to the tumor microenvironment. This case series describes five patients with ICI-treated MSI mCRC with disease progression limited to the adrenal glands. At ICI initiation, three patients were free of metastasis in the adrenal glands. Four patients experienced objective response per RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) while treated with ICI. ICI treatment was discontinued due to progressive disease limited to the adrenal glands (n=3) or toxicity (n=2). The time between ICI initiation and progression in the adrenal glands ranged from 11 to 39 months. Adrenalectomy (n=3) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (n=2) were performed. At the last follow-up, all patients were alive and progression free. Molecular analyses were performed in one patient. A significant impairment of the antigen presentation pathway was observed in the ICI-resistant lesion of the adrenal gland, which could be explained by the presence of glucocorticoids in the adrenal gland microenvironment. We also detected an overexpression of TSC22D3, a glucocorticoid-target gene that functions as a mediator of anti-inflammation and immunosuppression. This case series suggests that the adrenal glands may be the sanctuary sites for ICI-treated MSI mCRC through the glucocorticoid-induced impairment of the antigen presentation machinery.

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1948-1953 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zalcberg ◽  
M Millward ◽  
J Bishop ◽  
M McKeage ◽  
A Zimet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Docetaxel (Taxotere, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) and cisplatin are two of the most active single agents used in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A recently reported phase I study of the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin recommended a dose of 75 mg/m2 of both drugs every 3 weeks for subsequent phase II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years with a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2 and life expectancy > or = 12 weeks, with metastatic and/or locally advanced NSCLC proven histologically or cytologically. Patients were not permitted to have received prior chemotherapy, extensive radiotherapy, or any radiotherapy to the target lesion and must have had measurable disease. Concurrent treatment with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) or prophylactic antibiotics was not permitted. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2) in 250 mL 5% dextrose was given intravenously (i.v.) over 1 hour immediately before cisplatin (75 mg/m2) in 500 mL normal saline given i.v. over 1 hour in 3-week cycles. Premedication included ondansetron, dexamethasone, promethazine, and standard hyperhydration with magnesium supplementation. RESULTS A total of 47 patients, two thirds of whom had metastatic disease, were entered onto this phase II study. The majority of patients were male (72%) and of good (WHO 0 to 1) performance status (85%). All 47 patients were assessable for toxicity and 36 were for response. Three patients were ineligible and eight (17%) discontinued treatment because of significant toxicity. In assessable patients, the overall objective response rate was 38.9% (95% confidence limits [CL], 23.1% to 56.5%), 36.1% had stable disease, and 25% progressive disease. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 29.8%. Median survival was 9.6 months and estimated 1-year survival was 33%. Significant (grade 3/4) toxicities included nausea (26%), hypotension (15%), diarrhea (13%), and dyspnea mainly related to chest infection (13%). One patient experienced National Cancer Institute (NCI) grade 3 neurosensory toxicity after eight cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was common and occurred in 87% of patients, but thrombocytopenia > or = grade 3 was rare (one patient). Significant (grade 3/4) abnormalities of magnesium levels were common (24%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 13% of patients and neutropenic infection in 11%, contributing to two treatment-related deaths. No neutropenic enterocolitis or severe fluid retention was reported. CONCLUSION Compared with other active regimens used in this setting, the combination of docetaxel and cisplatin in advanced NSCLC is an active regimen with a similar toxicity profile to other combination regimens.

795 A multicenter phase II trial (SWOG S1609, cohort 51) of ipilimumab and nivolumab in metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma: a substudy of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A843-A843
Author(s):  
Michael Wagner ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Sandip Patel ◽  
Christopher Ryan ◽  
Ashish Sangal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Light Exposure ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundAngiosarcoma is a rare cancer of endothelial cells that can be aggressive and carries a high mortality. A subset of angiosarcomas are characterized by high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and UV light exposure DNA mutational signature. Isolated case reports have suggested clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in angiosarcoma; no prospective studies of immune checkpoint inhibition in angiosarcoma have been reported. We report efficacy analysis results for patients with advanced or unresectable angiosarcoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab as a cohort of an ongoing phase II study for rare cancers (NCT02834013).MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab (1mg/kg IV q6weeks) plus nivolumab (240mg IV q2weeks) for patients with metastatic or unresectable angiosarcoma. Primary endpoint is objective response rate as assessed by RECIST v1.1, including measurable cutaneous disease that can be followed by photography. Secondary endpoints include PFS, OS, stable disease at six months, and toxicity. A two-stage design is used with six patients in the first stage and an additional ten patients in the second stage.ResultsAt data cutoff, 16 patients with angiosarcoma were enrolled. Median age was 68 years (25-81 years). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (0-5). 9 patients had cutaneous primary tumors of any cutaneous site, 7 had non-cutaneous primary tumors. ORR for all patients was 25% (4/16, table 1, figure 1). Subgroup analysis revealed that 60% (3/5) of patients with primary cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face had a confirmed objective response. 6-month PFS was 38%. 75% of patients experienced an adverse event (AE), and 25% experienced a grade 3-4 AE. 68.8% experienced an immune related AE (irAE), and 2 (12.5%) developed grade 3 or 4 irAEs. Grade 3-4 irAEs were ALT and AST increase and diarrhea. There were no grade 5 toxicities.ConclusionsThe combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab was well tolerated and had an ORR of 25% in angiosarcoma regardless of primary site, with 3 of 5 patients with cutaneous tumors of the scalp or face responding. Ipilimumab and nivolumab warrant further investigation in angiosarcoma.AcknowledgementsFunding: National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute grant awards CA180888, CA180819, CA180868; and in part by Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyTrial RegistrationNCT02834013Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the NCI CIRB.

scholarly journals Cabozantinib As Salvage Therapy for Patients With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor–Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Phase II International Thyroid Oncology Group Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (29) ◽  
pp. 3315-3321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria E. Cabanillas ◽  
Jonas A. de Souza ◽  
Susan Geyer ◽  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Michael E. Menefee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor

Purpose Sorafenib and lenvatinib are oral multikinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and approved for radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). However, there are no approved second- or third-line therapies. MET is implicated in resistance to VEGFR inhibitors. Cabozantinib is an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET in addition to VEGFR and is approved for medullary thyroid cancer. In a phase I study of cabozantinib, five of eight patients with DTC previously treated with a VEGFR-targeted therapy had an objective response to cabozantinib. Patients and Methods Patients with RAI-refractory disease with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) measurable disease and evidence of progression on prior VEGFR-targeted therapy were enrolled in this single-arm phase II study. The cabozantinib starting dose was 60 mg/day orally but could be escalated to 80 mg if the patient did not experience a response. Patients underwent tumor assessment according to RECIST v1.1 every 8 weeks. In this study, if at least five of 25 response-evaluable patients had an objective response, cabozantinib would be considered a promising agent in this patient population. Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The median age was 64 years, and 64% of patients were men. Twenty-one patients had received only one prior VEGFR-targeted therapy (sorafenib, pazopanib, or cediranib), and four patients had received two such therapies. The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue, weight loss, diarrhea, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, and hypertension. One drug-related death was noted. Of the 25 patients, 10 (40%) had a partial response, 13 (52%) had stable disease, and two (8%) had nonevaluable disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 12.7 months and 34.7 months, respectively. Conclusion Cabozantinib demonstrated clinically significant, durable objective response activity in patients with RAI-refractory DTC who experienced disease progression while taking prior VEGFR-targeted therapy.

Phase II study of binimetinib with imatinib in patients with unresectable KIT-mutant melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9594-TPS9594
Author(s):  
Katy K. Tsai ◽  
Iwei Yeh ◽  
Adil Daud ◽  
Ari Oglesby
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Type I ◽  
True Response ◽  
Phase Ii Studies

TPS9594 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed treatment for patients (pts) with advanced melanoma, as have BRAF/MEK inhibitors for pts with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. However, pts with acral or mucosal melanomas are in particular need of more options given a lower objective response rate (ORR) to ICI, and lower incidence of BRAF V600 driver mutation. Such BRAF mutations are found in only 5-10% of acral/mucosal melanomas, while KIT mutations/amplifications are found in 10-20%. Even when present, a KIT alteration does not guarantee response to KIT inhibition, with only about one-third responding as previously shown in 3 phase II studies. A significant number of KIT-mutant melanomas have been shown to demonstrate NF1 or SPRED1 loss, with recent preclinical work showing that such alterations are associated with the loss of negative suppression of RAS, resulting in RAS activation and MEK dependence. We hypothesize that NF1 or SPRED1 loss cooperates with KIT mutations to drive melanomagenesis and resistance to KIT inhibition, and propose to target this vulnerability with a combination approach to targeted therapy. This phase II study will be the first to evaluate the efficacy and safety of binimetinib plus imatinib in pts with KIT-mutant melanoma. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated phase II study of binimetinib in combination with imatinib in pts with BRAF V600 WT, KIT-mutant unresectable melanoma who have progressed on or who are ineligible for ICI (NCT04598009). Pts will be ≥18 yo with performance status ECOG 0-2, and have unresectable Stage IIIB/C/D or Stage IV melanoma that is BRAF V600 WT and KIT-mutant by CLIA-certified testing platform. Pts will have progressed on prior ICI or other standard-of-care (SOC) therapies, or be ineligible for or unable to tolerate SOC therapies. Pts with brain metastasis will be eligible if clinically stable and determination made that no CNS-specific treatment is required prior to study start. Pts previously treated with a MEK inhibitor will be excluded. A Simon 2-stage Minimax design will be used; the null hypothesis that the true response rate is 0.1 will be tested against a one-sided alternative. 15 pts will be accrued in the first stage. If there are £1 responses, the study will be stopped. Otherwise, 10 additional pts will be accrued for a total of 25. The null hypothesis that the true response rate is 0.1 will be rejected if ≥6 responses are observed. This yields a type I error rate of 0.05 and power of 0.8017 when the true response rate is 0.3.Primary endpoint: ORR (RECIST). Secondary endpoints: duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, or SD ≥16 weeks), safety profile (CTCAE). Exploratory objectives to include investigations of association between clinical response and baseline NF1 and SPRED1 status, and of pathologic correlates of acquired resistance. Study began enrolling pts in December 2020 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04598009.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document