Dermatologic Imaging for Immunosuppressed Patients

Background: Seasonality is a characteristic of some respiratory viruses. The aim of our study was to evaluate the seasonality and the potential effects of different meteorological factors on the detection rate of the non-SARS coronavirus detection by PCR. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 12,763 respiratory tract sample results (288 positive and 12,475 negative) for non-SARS, non-MERS coronaviruses (NL63, 229E, OC43, HKU1). The effect of seven single weather factors on the coronavirus detection rate was fitted in a logistic regression model with and without adjusting for other weather factors. Results: Coronavirus infections followed a seasonal pattern peaking from December to March and plunged from July to September. The seasonal effect was less pronounced in immunosuppressed patients compared to immunocompetent patients. Different automatic variable selection processes agreed on selecting the predictors temperature, relative humidity, cloud cover and precipitation as remaining predictors in the multivariable logistic regression model, including all weather factors, with low ambient temperature, low relative humidity, high cloud cover and high precipitation being linked to increased coronavirus detection rates. Conclusions: Coronavirus infections followed a seasonal pattern, which was more pronounced in immunocompetent patients compared to immunosuppressed patients. Several meteorological factors were associated with the coronavirus detection rate. However, when mutually adjusting for all weather factors, only temperature, relative humidity, precipitation and cloud cover contributed independently to predicting the coronavirus detection rate.

Download Full-text

22. Description of Hospitalized Patients with Influenza Vaccine Failure

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.067 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S35-S35

Author(s):

Joanna Kimball ◽

Yuwei Zhu ◽

Dayna Wyatt ◽

Helen Talbot

Keyword(s):

Logistic Regression ◽

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Older Patients ◽

Influenza A ◽

Influenza Season ◽

Hospitalized Patients ◽

Vaccine Failure ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Immunosuppressed Patients

Abstract Background Despite influenza vaccination, some patients develop illness and require hospitalization. Many factors contribute to vaccine failure, including mismatch of the vaccine and circulating strains, waning immunity, timing of influenza season, age and patient comorbidities such as immune function. This study compared vaccinated, hospitalized patients with and without influenza. Methods This study used 2015–2019 Tennessee data from the US Hospitalized Adult Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network database. Enrolled patients were ≥ 18 years vaccinated for the current influenza season and admitted with an acute respiratory illness. Patient or surrogate interviews and medical chart abstractions were performed, and influenza vaccinations were confirmed by vaccine providers. Influenza PCR testing was performed in a research lab. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA and R using Pearson’s chi-squared, Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and multivariate logistic regression. Results 1236 patients met study criteria, and 235 (19%) tested positive for influenza. Demographics, vaccines and comorbidities were similar between the two groups (Table 1) except for morbid obesity, which was more common in influenza negative patients (13% vs 8%, p = 0.04), and immunosuppression, which was more common in the influenza positive (63% vs 54%, p = 0.01). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated older patients (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.03–2.10) and immunosuppressed patients (OR 1.56, 1.15–2.12) were at increased risk for influenza (Table 2 and Figure 1). Immunosuppression also increased the risk for influenza A/H3N2 (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.25–2.75). A sensitivity analysis was performed on patients who self-reported influenza vaccination for the current season without vaccine verification and demonstrated increased risk of influenza in older adults (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.16–2.39). Table 1: Demographics of influenza positive versus influenza negative patients in influenza vaccinated, hospitalized patients. Table 2: Logistic regression analyses of vaccinated, hospitalized influenza positive patients; vaccinated, hospitalized patients with influenza A subtypes and self-reported vaccinated, hospitalized influenza positive patients. Figure 1: Predicted Probability of Hospitalization with Influenza, Influenza A/H1N1 and Influenza A/H3N2 in Vaccinated Patients by Age. Conclusion Our study demonstrated an increased risk of influenza vaccine failure in older patients and immunosuppressed patients. These groups are also at increased risk for influenza complications. To improve protection of these patients against future influenza illnesses, more effective vaccines are needed, and more research on ring vaccination should be pursued. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

Pathogenic Determinants of the Mycobacterium kansasii Complex: An Unsuspected Role for Distributive Conjugal Transfer

Microorganisms ◽

10.3390/microorganisms9020348 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. 348

Author(s):

Florian Tagini ◽

Trestan Pillonel ◽

Claire Bertelli ◽

Katia Jaton ◽

Gilbert Greub

Keyword(s):

Genomic Analysis ◽

Comparative Genomic ◽

Mycobacterium Kansasii ◽

Type Vii Secretion ◽

A Genome ◽

Genes Encoding ◽

Associated Proteins ◽

Immunosuppressed Patients ◽

Type Vii Secretion System ◽

Clinical Records

The Mycobacterium kansasii species comprises six subtypes that were recently classified into six closely related species; Mycobacterium kansasii (formerly M. kansasii subtype 1), Mycobacterium persicum (subtype 2), Mycobacterium pseudokansasii (subtype 3), Mycobacterium ostraviense (subtype 4), Mycobacterium innocens (subtype 5) and Mycobacterium attenuatum (subtype 6). Together with Mycobacterium gastri, they form the M. kansasii complex. M. kansasii is the most frequent and most pathogenic species of the complex. M. persicum is classically associated with diseases in immunosuppressed patients, and the other species are mostly colonizers, and are only very rarely reported in ill patients. Comparative genomics was used to assess the genetic determinants leading to the pathogenicity of members of the M. kansasii complex. The genomes of 51 isolates collected from patients with and without disease were sequenced and compared with 24 publicly available genomes. The pathogenicity of each isolate was determined based on the clinical records or public metadata. A comparative genomic analysis showed that all M. persicum, M. ostraviense, M innocens and M. gastri isolates lacked the ESX-1-associated EspACD locus that is thought to play a crucial role in the pathogenicity of M. tuberculosis and other non-tuberculous mycobacteria. Furthermore, M. kansasii was the only species exhibiting a 25-Kb-large genomic island encoding for 17 type-VII secretion system-associated proteins. Finally, a genome-wide association analysis revealed that two consecutive genes encoding a hemerythrin-like protein and a nitroreductase-like protein were significantly associated with pathogenicity. These two genes may be involved in the resistance to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, a required mechanism for the intracellular survival of bacteria. Three non-pathogenic M. kansasii lacked these genes likely due to two distinct distributive conjugal transfers (DCTs) between M. attenuatum and M. kansasii, and one DCT between M. persicum and M. kansasii. To our knowledge, this is the first study linking DCT to reduced pathogenicity.

Download Full-text

Cancer immunotherapy in special challenging populations: recommendations of the Advisory Committee of Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM)

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer ◽

10.1136/jitc-2020-001664 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. e001664

Author(s):

Maria Gonzalez-Cao ◽

Teresa Puertolas ◽

Mar Riveiro ◽

Eva Muñoz-Couselo ◽

Carolina Ortiz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Immunotherapy ◽

Multidisciplinary Approach ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Solid Organ Transplantation ◽

Latent Tuberculosis ◽

Solid Organ ◽

Chronic Infections ◽

Immunosuppressed Patients ◽

History Of ◽

Evidence Based Guidelines

Cancer immunotherapy based on the use of antibodies targeting the so-called checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death-1 receptor, its ligand, or CTLA-4, has shown durable clinical benefit and survival improvement in melanoma and other tumors. However, there are some special situations that could be a challenge for clinical management. Persons with chronic infections, such as HIV-1 or viral hepatitis, latent tuberculosis, or a history of solid organ transplantation, could be candidates for cancer immunotherapy, but their management requires a multidisciplinary approach. The Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM) panel in collaboration with experts in virology and immunology from different centers in Spain reviewed the literature and developed evidence-based guidelines for cancer immunotherapy management in patients with chronic infections and immunosuppression. These are the first clinical guidelines for cancer immunotherapy treatment in special challenging populations. Cancer immunotherapy in chronically infected or immunosuppressed patients is feasible but needs a multidisciplinary approach in order to decrease the risk of complications related to the coexistent comorbidities.

Download Full-text

BI07: The effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic on immunosuppressed patients undergoing skin surveillance

British Journal of Dermatology ◽

10.1111/bjd.20305 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 185 (S1) ◽

pp. 145-145

Keyword(s):

Immunosuppressed Patients

Download Full-text

Impact of immunosuppressive agents on clinical manifestations and outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection – A propensity score matched analysis in two large, prospectively evaluated cohorts

Clinical Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/cid/ciab385 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Johannes Camp ◽

Lina Glaubitz ◽

Tim Filla ◽

Achim J Kaasch ◽

Frieder Fuchs ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Staphylococcus Aureus ◽

Propensity Score ◽

Bloodstream Infection ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Immunosuppressive Agents ◽

Late Complications ◽

Competing Risk ◽

Immunosuppressed Patients ◽

Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) is a common, life-threatening infection. The impact of immunosuppressive agents on the outcome of patients with SAB is incompletely understood. Methods Data from two large prospective, international, multicenter cohort studies (INSTINCT and ISAC) between 2006 and 2015 were analyzed. Patients receiving immunosuppressive agents were identified and a 1:1 propensity score (PS) matched analysis was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics of patients. Overall survival and time to SAB-related late complications (SAB relapse, infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, or other deep-seated manifestations) were analyzed by Cox regression and competing risk analyses, respectively. This approach was then repeated for specific immunosuppressive agents (corticosteroids [CSMT] and immunosuppressive agents other than steroids [IMOTS]). Results Of 3,188 analyzed patients, 309 were receiving immunosuppressive treatment according to our definitions and were matched to 309 non-immunosuppressed patients. After PS matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced. In the Cox regression analysis, we observed no significant difference in survival between the two groups (death during follow-up: 105/309 (33.9 %) immunosuppressed patients vs. 94/309 (30.4 %) non-immunosuppressed, hazard ratio 1.20 (95% CI 0.84–1.71). Competing risk analysis showed a cause-specific hazard ratio (CSHR) of 1.81 (95% CI 0.85–3.87) for SAB-related late-complications in patients receiving immunosuppressive agents. CSHR was higher in patients taking IMOTS (3.69; 95% CI 1.41–9.68). Conclusions Immunosuppressive agents were not associated with an overall higher mortality. The risk for SAB-related late complications in patients receiving specific immunosuppressive agents such as IMOTs warrants further investigations.

Download Full-text

COVID-19—Importance for Patients on the Waiting List and after Kidney Transplantation—A Single Center Evaluation in 2020–2021

Pathogens ◽

10.3390/pathogens10040429 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (4) ◽

pp. 429

Author(s):

Simone C. Boedecker ◽

Pascal Klimpke ◽

Daniel Kraus ◽

Stefan Runkel ◽

Peter R. Galle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Kidney Transplantation ◽

Waiting List ◽

Smoking History ◽

Immunocompromised Patients ◽

Dialysis Patients ◽

Vaccination Programs ◽

Mild Disease ◽

Probability Of Survival ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Immunosuppressed Patients

(1) Background: Dialysis patients and recipients of a kidney allograft are at high risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2. It has been shown that the development of potent neutralizing humoral immunity against SARS CoV-2 leads to an increased probability of survival. However, the question of whether immunocompromised patients develop antibodies has not yet been sufficiently investigated; (2) Methods: SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were examined in hemodialysis patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation as well as patients after kidney transplantation. Patients were interviewed about symptoms and comorbidities, BMI, and smoking history; (3) Results: SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were found in 16 out of 259 patients (6%). The trend of infections here reflects the general course of infection in Germany with a peak in November/December of 2020. Remarkably, patients on the waiting list experienced only mild disease. In contrast, transplanted patients had to be hospitalized but recovered rapidly from COVID-19. Most interesting is that all immunosuppressed patients developed antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 after infection; (4) Conclusions: Even with extensive hygiene concepts, an above-average number of patients were infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the second wave of infections in Germany. Because SARS-CoV-2 infection triggered the formation of antibodies even in these immunocompromised patients, we expect vaccination to be effective in this group of patients. Thus, dialysis patients and patients after kidney transplantation should be given high priority in vaccination programs.

Download Full-text

Comparative Assessment of In-House Real-Time PCRs Targeting Enteric Disease-Associated Microsporidia in Human Stool Samples

Pathogens ◽

10.3390/pathogens10060656 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (6) ◽

pp. 656

Author(s):

Konstantin Tanida ◽

Andreas Hahn ◽

Kirsten Alexandra Eberhardt ◽

Egbert Tannich ◽

Olfert Landt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real Time ◽

Indigenous People ◽

Real Time Pcr ◽

Latent Class ◽

Enterocytozoon Bieneusi ◽

Enteric Disease ◽

Immunosuppressed Patients ◽

Study Population ◽

Stool Samples ◽

Pcr Assays

Microsporidiosis is an infection predominantly occurring in immunosuppressed patients and infrequently also in travelers. This study was performed to comparatively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of real-time PCR assays targeting microsporidia with etiological relevance in the stool of human patients in a latent class analysis-based test comparison without a reference standard with perfect accuracy. Thereby, two one-tube real-time PCR assays and two two-tube real-time PCR assays targeting Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalocytozoon spp. were included in the assessment with reference stool material (20), stool samples from Ghanaian HIV-positive patients (903), and from travelers, migrants and Colombian indigenous people (416). Sensitivity of the assays ranged from 60.4% to 97.4% and specificity from 99.1% to 100% with substantial agreement according to Cohen’s kappa of 79.6%. Microsporidia DNA was detected in the reference material and the stool of the HIV patients but not in the stool of the travelers, migrants, and the Colombian indigenous people. Accuracy-adjusted prevalence was 5.8% (n = 78) for the study population as a whole. In conclusion, reliable detection of enteric disease-associated microsporidia in stool samples by real-time PCR could be demonstrated, but sensitivity between the compared microsporidia-specific real-time PCR assays varied.

Download Full-text