Skin necrosis and calcifications after extravasation of vancomycin: a localised form of calciphylaxis?

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 390-393
Author(s):  
Nora Zenati ◽  
Charles Khouri ◽  
Carole Schwebel ◽  
Sophie Blaise
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Skin Necrosis ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Glycopeptide Antibiotic ◽  
Cutaneous Necrosis ◽  
Triggering Factor ◽  
Vancomycin Dosage

Vancomycin is a tricyclic glycopeptide antibiotic produced from Streptococcus orientalis. There is much variation in the literature with regard to the recommended dose, dilution rate and type of infusion. Given the vesicant properties of vancomycin at supratherapeutic doses (>10mg/ml), tissue damage including blistering and necrosis have been reported. We report a rare case of bilateral cutaneous necrosis induced by accidental extravasation of vancomycin when being intravenously administered. The skin surrounding the injection site was marked by the appearance of subcutaneous calcifications. The development of iatrogenic skin calcinosis has not yet been described for the extravasation of vancomycin. The mechanism underlying the calcinosis observed in our case remains unclear, but we hypothesised a form of localised calciphylaxis induced by a local triggering factor. The ulcers progressed to re-epithelialisation following necrosis debridement and local conservative treatments. Given the increased prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, which has prompted clinicians to gradually increase vancomycin dosage, clinicians should be aware of the high risk of skin toxicity in cases of vancomycin high-dose extravasation.

LOW-DOSE-RATE OR HIGH-DOSE-RATE BRACHYTHERAPY IN COMBINATION WITH EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY FOR INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-83
Author(s):  
Vladimir Solodkiy ◽  
Andrey Pavlov ◽  
Aleksey Tsybulskiy ◽  
Anton Ivashin
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Low Dose Rate ◽  
Risk Of Progression

Introduction. One of the main problems of modem on-courology is treatment for prostate cancer of intermediate and high risk of progression. Modern radiotherapy in this category of patients has an advantage over surgical methods of treatment. One way to improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy is to escalate the dose in the prostate gland. For this purpose a combination of brachytherapy and remote radiotherapy is used. This combination allows increasing the dose of radiation, thereby providing better local control, reducing complications from neighboring organs. Purpose of the study. To conduct a comparative analysis of efficacy and safety of radical treatment of patients with prostate cancer at medium and high risk of progression using a combination of high and low dose rate brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy. Materials and methods. 107 patients with prostate cancer of the group of medium and high risk of progression combined treatment (brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy) was conducted. 53 patients underwent combined treatment (HDR-brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy). 54 patients underwent combined treatment (LDR-brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy). The observation period was 5 years. Conclusion. In a comparative analysis in groups of combined radiotherapy with the use of high-dose and low-dose-rate brachytherapy, the same effectiveness of immediate and long-term results of treatment was demonstrated. A significant reduction in early and late toxic reactions in patients with high-power brachytherapy has been demonstrated.

scholarly journals Immune Monitoring during Therapy Reveals Activitory and Regulatory Immune Responses in High-Risk Neuroblastoma

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2096
Author(s):  
Celina L. Szanto ◽  
Annelisa M. Cornel ◽  
Sara M. Tamminga ◽  
Eveline M. Delemarre ◽  
Coco C. H. de Koning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Immune Monitoring ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Effector Cells ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Immune Cell Subsets

Despite intensive treatment, including consolidation immunotherapy (IT), prognosis of high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL) is poor. Immune status of patients over the course of treatment, and thus immunological features potentially explaining therapy efficacy, are largely unknown. In this study, the dynamics of immune cell subsets and their function were explored in 25 HR-NBL patients at diagnosis, during induction chemotherapy, before high-dose chemotherapy, and during IT. The dynamics of immune cells varied largely between patients. IL-2- and GM-CSF-containing IT cycles resulted in significant expansion of effector cells (NK-cells in IL-2 cycles, neutrophils and monocytes in GM-CSF cycles). Nonetheless, the cytotoxic phenotype of NK-cells was majorly disturbed at the start of IT, and both IL-2 and GM-CSF IT cycles induced preferential expansion of suppressive regulatory T-cells. Interestingly, proliferative capacity of purified patient T-cells was impaired at diagnosis as well as during therapy. This study indicates the presence of both immune-enhancing as well as regulatory responses in HR-NBL patients during (immuno)therapy. Especially the double-edged effects observed in IL-2-containing IT cycles are interesting, as this potentially explains the absence of clinical benefit of IL-2 addition to IT cycles. This suggests that there is a need to combine anti-GD2 with more specific immune-enhancing strategies to improve IT outcome in HR-NBL.

scholarly journals MUKnine OPTIMUM protocol: a screening study to identify high-risk patients with multiple myeloma suitable for novel treatment approaches combined with a phase II study evaluating optimised combination of biological therapy in newly diagnosed high-risk multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukaemia

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e046225
Author(s):  
Sarah Brown ◽  
Debbie Sherratt ◽  
Samantha Hinsley ◽  
Louise Flanagan ◽  
Sadie Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Cell Leukaemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Genetic Changes ◽  
Novel Treatment

IntroductionMultiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell tumour with over 5800 new cases each year in the UK. The introduction of biological therapies has improved outcomes for the majority of patients with MM, but in approximately 20% of patients the tumour is characterised by genetic changes which confer a significantly poorer prognosis, generally termed high-risk (HR) MM. It is important to diagnose these genetic changes early and identify more effective first-line treatment options for these patients.Methods and analysisThe Myeloma UK nine OPTIMUM trial (MUKnine) evaluates novel treatment strategies for patients with HRMM. Patients with suspected or newly diagnosed MM, fit for intensive therapy, are offered participation in a tumour genetic screening protocol (MUKnine a), with primary endpoint proportion of patients with molecular screening performed within 8 weeks. Patients identified as molecularly HR are invited into the phase II, single-arm, multicentre trial (MUKnine b) investigating an intensive treatment schedule comprising bortezomib, lenalidomide, daratumumab, low-dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, with single high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by combination consolidation and maintenance therapy. MUKnine b primary endpoints are minimal residual disease (MRD) at day 100 post-ASCT and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include response, safety and quality of life. The trial uses a Bayesian decision rule to determine if this treatment strategy is sufficiently active for further study. Patients identified as not having HR disease receive standard treatment and are followed up in a cohort study. Exploratory studies include longitudinal whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for imaging MRD testing.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval London South East Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 17/LO/0022, 17/LO/0023). Results of studies will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberISRCTN16847817, May 2017; Pre-results.

scholarly journals Very rare case of Graves’ disease with resistance to methimazole: a case report and literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 030006052199619
Author(s):  
Yusaku Mori ◽  
Munenori Hiromura ◽  
Michishige Terasaki ◽  
Hideki Kushima ◽  
Makoto Ohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Hormone ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Lithium Carbonate ◽  
Graves Disease ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hormone Concentration ◽  
Thyroid Hormone Concentration ◽  
Serum Thyroid Hormone ◽  
Inorganic Iodine

Background Methimazole (MMI) is used to treat hyperthyroidism in Graves’ disease. It is rare to encounter patients in whom hyperthyroidism cannot be controlled using high doses of MMI. Case presentation: A 21-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of MMI-resistant Graves’ disease. Although her MMI dose had been increased to 120 mg/day, her serum thyroid hormone concentration was too high to be measured. Additional therapy with lithium carbonate, and then with dexamethasone and inorganic iodine, was initiated. After 14 days, the patient’s serum thyroid hormone concentration normalized, while she was taking 150 mg/day MMI, 800 mg/day lithium carbonate, 6 mg/day dexamethasone and 306 mg/day inorganic iodine, and total thyroidectomy was then performed. The patient was discharged 8 days after the thyroidectomy and experienced no major complications. Conclusions We have presented a rare case of Graves’ disease that was resistant to high-dose MMI. Combination therapy of MMI with lithium carbonate, dexamethasone and inorganic iodine may represent a therapeutic option for the preoperative preparation of patients with MMI-resistant Graves’ disease.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Post-Operative Treatment with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in High-Risk Resected Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OCSCC): A Multi-Institutional Collaboration

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 2409-2419
Author(s):  
Arslan Babar ◽  
Neil M. Woody ◽  
Ahmed I. Ghanem ◽  
Jillian Tsai ◽  
Neal E. Dunlap ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Pathologic Features

Adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), with high-dose cisplatin remains standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with high-risk pathologic features. We evaluated outcomes associated with different cisplatin dosing and schedules, concurrent with radiation (RT), and the effect of cumulative dosing of cisplatin. An IRB-approved collaborative database of patients (pts) with primary OCSCC (Stage I–IVB AJCC 7th edition) treated with primary surgical resection between January 2005 and January 2015, with or without adjuvant therapy, was established from six academic institutions. Patients were categorized by cisplatin dose and schedule, and resultant groups compared for demographic data, pathologic features, and outcomes by statistical analysis to determine disease free survival (DFS) and freedom from metastatic disease (DM). From a total sample size of 1282 pts, 196 pts were identified with high-risk features who were treated with adjuvant CRT. Administration schedule of cisplatin was not significantly associated with DFS. On multivariate (MVA), DFS was significantly better in patients without perineural invasion (PNI) and in those receiving ≥200 mg/m2 cisplatin dose (p < 0.001 and 0.007). Median DFS, by cisplatin dose, was 10.5 (<200 mg/m2) vs. 20.8 months (≥200 mg/m2). Our analysis demonstrated cumulative cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m2 was associated with improved DFS in high-risk resected OCSCC pts.

Duration of High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b Regimen for Resected High-Risk Melanoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (25) ◽  
pp. e82-e83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjiv S. Agarwala ◽  
Robert J. Gray ◽  
Michael K.K. Wong
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Interferon Alfa ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Risk Melanoma ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
High Dose Interferon
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document