scholarly journals Association between prediagnosis depression and mortality among postmenopausal women with colorectal cancer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0244728
Author(s):  
Xiaoyun Liang ◽  
Michael Hendryx ◽  
Lihong Qi ◽  
Dorothy Lane ◽  
Juhua Luo

Background There are no epidemiologic data on the relation of depression before colorectal cancer diagnosis to colorectal cancer mortality among women with colorectal cancer, especially those who are postmenopausal. Our aim was to fill this research gap. Methods We analyzed data from a large prospective cohort in the US, the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI). The study included 2,396 women with incident colorectal cancer, assessed for depressive symptoms and antidepressant use before cancer diagnosis at baseline (screening visit in the WHI study) during 1993–1998. Participants were followed up from cancer diagnosis till 2018. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) between depression (depressive symptoms or antidepressant use) at baseline, and all-cause mortality and colorectal cancer-specific mortality. Results Among women with colorectal cancer, there was no association between baseline depression and all-cause mortality or colorectal cancer-specific mortality after adjusting for age or multiple covariates. Conclusion Among women with colorectal cancer, there was no statistically significant association between depression before colorectal cancer diagnosis and all-cause mortality or colorectal cancer-specific mortality. Further studies are warranted to assess depressive symptoms and antidepressant use, measured at multiple points from baseline to diagnosis, and their interactions with specific types of colorectal cancer treatment on the risk of death from colorectal cancer.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 885-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baiyu Yang ◽  
Eric J. Jacobs ◽  
Susan M. Gapstur ◽  
Victoria Stevens ◽  
Peter T. Campbell

Purpose Active smoking is associated with higher colorectal cancer risk, but its association with survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis is unclear. We investigated associations of smoking, before and after diagnosis, with all-cause and colorectal cancer–specific mortality among colorectal cancer survivors. Patients and Methods From a cohort of adults who were initially free of colorectal cancer, we identified 2,548 persons diagnosed with invasive, nonmetastatic colorectal cancer between baseline (1992 or 1993) and 2009. Vital status and cause of death were determined through 2010. Smoking was self-reported on the baseline questionnaire and updated in 1997 and every 2 years thereafter. Postdiagnosis smoking information was available for 2,256 persons (88.5%). Results Among the 2,548 colorectal cancer survivors, 1,074 died during follow-up, including 453 as a result of colorectal cancer. In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models, prediagnosis current smoking was associated with higher all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR], 2.12; 95% CI, 1.65 to 2.74) and colorectal cancer–specific mortality (RR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.07), whereas former smoking was associated with higher all-cause mortality (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.36) but not with colorectal cancer–specific mortality (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.10). Postdiagnosis current smoking was associated with higher all-cause (RR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.58 to 3.13) and colorectal cancer–specific mortality (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.21), whereas former smoking was associated with all-cause mortality (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.42). Conclusion This study adds to the existing evidence that cigarette smoking is associated with higher all-cause and colorectal cancer–specific mortality among persons with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2599-2599
Author(s):  
Susan Spillane ◽  
Kathleen Bennett ◽  
Linda Sharp ◽  
Thomas Ian Barron

2599 Background: Preclinical studies have suggested a role for metformin in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Associations between metformin versus sulfonylurea exposure and mortality (all-cause and colorectal cancer specific) are assessed in this population-based study of patients with a diagnosis of stage I-IV CRC. Methods: National Cancer Registry Ireland records were linked to prescription claims data and used to identify a cohort of patients with incident TNM stage I-IV CRC diagnosed 2001-2006. From this cohort, 2 patient groups were identified and compared for outcomes - those who received a prescription for metformin +/- a sulfonylurea (MET) or a prescription for sulfonylurea alone (SUL) in the 90 days pre CRC diagnosis. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, stage, grade, site, comorbidities, year of diagnosis, and insulin, aspirin or statin exposure. Analyses were repeated stratifying by stage and site. Results: 5,617 patients with stage I-IV CRC were identified, of whom 369 received a prescription for metformin or a sulfonylurea in the 90 days pre diagnosis (median follow-up 1.6 years; MET: n=257; SUL: n=112). In adjusted analyses metformin exposure was associated with a 28% lower risk of all-cause mortality relative to sulfonylurea exposure (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.98) and a non-significant 24% reduction in CRC-specific mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.52-1.13). In analyses stratified by site, in colon cancer, metformin exposure was associated with a significant one-third reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.95) and a non-significant reduction in site-specific mortality (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.40-1.02). No mortality benefit was observed for rectal cancer. The association between metformin exposure and reduced mortality was strongest for stage I/II disease (all-cause mortality: HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.98; CRC-specific mortality: HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.21-1.11). Conclusions: Pre-diagnosis metformin exposure in CRC patients was associated with a significant reduction in mortality relative to sulfonylurea exposure. This benefit was greatest in patients with colon cancer and early stage disease.


2018 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie Kyrø ◽  
Kirsten Frederiksen ◽  
Marianne Holm ◽  
Natalja P. Nørskov ◽  
Knud E. B. Knudsen ◽  
...  

AbstractThe association between lifestyle and survival after colorectal cancer has received limited attention. The female sex hormone, oestrogen, has been associated with lower colorectal cancer risk and mortality after colorectal cancer. Phyto-oestrogens are plant compounds with structure similar to oestrogen, and the main sources in Western populations are plant lignans. We investigated the association between the main lignan metabolite, enterolactone and survival after colorectal cancer among participants in the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort. Prediagnosis plasma samples and lifestyle data, and clinical data from time of diagnosis from 416 women and 537 men diagnosed with colorectal cancer were used. Enterolactone was measured in plasma using a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) method. Participants were followed from date of diagnosis until death or end of follow-up. During this time, 210 women and 325 men died (170 women and 215 men died due to colorectal cancer). The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % CI. Enterolactone concentrations were associated with lower colorectal cancer-specific mortality among women (HRper doubling: 0·88, 95 % CI 0·80, 0·97, P=0·0123). For men, on the contrary, enterolactone concentrations were associated with higher colorectal cancer-specific mortality (HRper doubling: 1·10, 95 % CI 1·01, 1·21, P=0·0379). The use of antibiotics affects enterolactone production, and the associations between higher enterolactone and lower colorectal cancer-specific mortality were more pronounced among women who did not use antibiotics (analysis on a subset). Our results suggest that enterolactone is associated with lower risk of mortality among women, but the opposite association was found among men.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (22) ◽  
pp. 2335-2343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baiyu Yang ◽  
Marjorie L. McCullough ◽  
Susan M. Gapstur ◽  
Eric J. Jacobs ◽  
Roberd M. Bostick ◽  
...  

Purpose Higher calcium, vitamin D, and dairy product intakes are associated with lower colorectal cancer incidence, but their impacts on colorectal cancer survival are unclear. We evaluated associations of calcium, vitamin D, and dairy product intakes before and after colorectal cancer diagnosis with all-cause and colorectal cancer-specific mortality among colorectal cancer patients. Patients and Methods This analysis included 2,284 participants in a prospective cohort who were diagnosed with invasive, nonmetastatic colorectal cancer after baseline (1992 or 1993) and up to 2009. Mortality follow-up was through 2010. Prediagnosis risk factor information was collected on the baseline questionnaire. Postdiagnosis information was collected via questionnaires in 1999 and 2003 and was available for 1,111 patients. Results A total of 949 participants with colorectal cancer died during follow-up, including 408 from colorectal cancer. In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models, postdiagnosis total calcium intake was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR] for those in the highest relative to the lowest quartiles, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53-0.98; Ptrend = .02) and associated with marginally statistically significant reduced colorectal cancer-specific mortality (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33 to 1.05; Ptrend = .01). An inverse association with all-cause mortality was also observed for postdiagnosis milk intake (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.94; Ptrend = .02), but not vitamin D intake. Prediagnosis calcium, vitamin D, and dairy product intakes were not associated with any mortality outcomes. Conclusion Higher postdiagnosis intakes of total calcium and milk may be associated with lower risk of death among patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Djibril M. Ba ◽  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Joshua Muscat ◽  
Laila Al-Shaar ◽  
Vernon Chinchilli ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Whether mushroom consumption, which is rich in several bioactive compounds, including the crucial antioxidants ergothioneine and glutathione, is inversely associated with low all-cause and cause-specific mortality remains uncertain. This study aimed to prospectively investigate the association between mushroom consumption and all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk. Methods Longitudinal analyses of participants from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) extant data (1988–1994). Mushroom intake was assessed by a single 24-h dietary recall using the US Department of Agriculture food codes for recipe foods. All-cause and cause-specific mortality were assessed in all participants linked to the National Death Index mortality data (1988–2015). We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to calculate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Results Among 15,546 participants included in the current analysis, the mean (SE) age was  44.3 (0.5) years. During a mean (SD) follow-up duration of 19.5 (7.4) years , a total of 5826 deaths were documented. Participants who reported consuming mushrooms had lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with those without mushroom intake (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73–0.98) after adjusting for demographic, major lifestyle factors, overall diet quality, and other dietary factors including total energy. When cause-specific mortality was examined, we did not observe any statistically significant associations with mushroom consumption. Consuming 1-serving of mushrooms per day instead of 1-serving of processed or red meats was associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50–0.84). We also observed a dose-response relationship between higher mushroom consumption and lower risk of all-cause mortality (P-trend = 0.03). Conclusion Mushroom consumption was associated with a lower risk of total mortality in this nationally representative sample of US adults.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Úna McMenamin ◽  
Blánaid Hicks ◽  
Carmel Hughes ◽  
Peter Murchie ◽  
Julia Hippisley-Cox ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is widely used and has proven benefits for women with menopausal symptoms. An increasing number of women with cancer experience menopausal symptoms but the safety of HRT use in women with cancer is unclear. There are particular concerns that HRT could accelerate cancer progression in women with cancer, and also that HRT could increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in such women. Therefore, our primary aim is to determine whether HRT use alters the risk of cancer-specific mortality in women with a range of common cancers. Our secondary objectives are to investigate whether HRT alters the risk of second cancers, cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism and all-cause mortality. Methods The study will utilise independent population-based data from Wales using the SAIL databank and Scotland based upon the national Prescribing Information System. The study will include women newly diagnosed with common cancers from 2000 to 2016, identified from cancer registries. Women with breast cancers will be excluded. HRT will be ascertained using electronic prescribing in Wales or dispensing records in Scotland. The primary outcome will be time to cancer-specific mortality from national mortality records. Time-dependent cox regression models will be used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for cancer specific death in HRT users compared with non-users after cancer diagnosis after adjusting for relevant confounders, stratified by cancer site. Analysis will be repeated investigating the impact of HRT use immediately before cancer diagnosis. Secondary analyses will be conducted on the risk of second cancers, cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism and all-cause mortality. Analyses will be conducted within each cohort and pooled across cohorts. Discussion Our study will provide evidence to inform guidance given to women diagnosed with cancer on the safety of HRT use and/or guide modifications to clinical practice.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed N. Dehal ◽  
Christina C. Newton ◽  
Eric J. Jacobs ◽  
Alpa V. Patel ◽  
Susan M. Gapstur ◽  
...  

Purpose To examine the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and survival among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to evaluate whether this association varies by sex, insulin treatment, and durations of T2DM and insulin use. Patients and Methods This study was conducted among 2,278 men and women diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon or rectal cancer between 1992 and 2007 in the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort, a prospective study of cancer incidence. In 1992 to 1993, participants completed a detailed, self-administrated questionnaire. Vital status and cause of death were ascertained through the end of 2008. Multivariable-adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Among the 2,278 men and women with nonmetastatic CRC, there were 842 deaths by the end of follow-up (including 377 deaths from CRC and 152 deaths from cardiovascular disease [CVD]). Among men and women combined, compared with patients without T2DM, patients with CRC and T2DM were at higher risk of all-cause mortality (RR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.83), CRC-specific mortality (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.70), and CVD-specific mortality (RR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.44 to 3.24), with no apparent differences by sex or durations of T2DM or insulin use. Insulin use, compared with no T2DM, was associated with increased risk of death from all causes (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.31) and CVD (RR, 3.87; 95% CI, 2.12 to 7.08) but not from CRC (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.28 to 1.19). Conclusion Patients with CRC and T2DM have a higher risk of mortality than patients with CRC who do not have T2DM, especially a higher risk of death from CVD.


2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-217176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Hao Li ◽  
Xiang Gao ◽  
Vincent CH Chung ◽  
Wen-Fang Zhong ◽  
Qi Fu ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo evaluate the associations of regular glucosamine use with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a large prospective cohort.MethodsThis population-based prospective cohort study included 495 077 women and men (mean (SD) age, 56.6 (8.1) years) from the UK Biobank study. Participants were recruited from 2006 to 2010 and were followed up through 2018. We evaluated all-cause mortality and mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, respiratory and digestive disease. HRs and 95% CIs for all-cause and cause-specific mortality were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for potential confounding variables.ResultsAt baseline, 19.1% of the participants reported regular use of glucosamine supplements. During a median follow-up of 8.9 years (IQR 8.3–9.7 years), 19 882 all-cause deaths were recorded, including 3802 CVD deaths, 8090 cancer deaths, 3380 respiratory disease deaths and 1061 digestive disease deaths. In multivariable adjusted analyses, the HRs associated with glucosamine use were 0.85 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.89) for all-cause mortality, 0.82 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.90) for CVD mortality, 0.94 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.99) for cancer mortality, 0.73 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81) for respiratory mortality and 0.74 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.90) for digestive mortality. The inverse associations of glucosamine use with all-cause mortality seemed to be somewhat stronger among current than non-current smokers (p for interaction=0.00080).ConclusionsRegular glucosamine supplementation was associated with lower mortality due to all causes, cancer, CVD, respiratory and digestive diseases.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1598-1598
Author(s):  
Yakir Rottenberg ◽  
Aviad Zick ◽  
Tamar Peretz

1598 Background: In recent years, the 5 year survival following cancer diagnosis is about two thirds. Among patients with various chronic diseases, improved survival is known to be associated with higher income and education. The aim of the current study is to assess the influence of income and education on survival following cancer diagnosis in Israel. Methods: Retrospective cohort study, using baseline measurement from the 1995 census conducted by the Central Bureau of Statistics in Israel. Cancer data were obtained from the Israel Cancer Registry. Cox proportional hazards ratios were calculated for mortality among cancer patients and adjusted for age, sex, religious, income and education years. The first model excluded cancers associated with early detection (breast, prostate, colorectal and cervix), and a second model excluded also lung cancer in order to control for smoking which is common in lower socioeconomic status. Results: A total of 3,712 cases of cancer and 1,252 deaths were reported during the study period. Higher income (HR=0.985 per 1000NIS, approximately 330$ in 1995's value, p=0.016) and education (HR=0.957 per year of education, p<0.001) were associated with decreased risk of death after cancer diagnosis. Jews had better prognosis than non-Jews following cancer diagnosis (HR=0.62, p<0.001), while males (HR=1.54, p<0.001) and age (HR=1.036 per year, p<0.001) had been associated with worse prognosis. The association between higher income and education was not changed in a model which excluded lung cancer. Conclusions: Higher income and education are associated with improved survival after cancer diagnosis. In the light of current study, further studies are needed to depict the variation in cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and treatment disparities related to socioeconomic variables.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18034-e18034
Author(s):  
Kristen Cagino ◽  
Ryan Kahn ◽  
Susie Chan ◽  
Charlene Thomas ◽  
Paul J. Christos ◽  
...  

e18034 Background: Brain metastasis secondary to gyn malignancy is rare and associated with poor prognosis, with limited available data and no definitive management guidelines. We aimed to identify factors and treatments associated with improved overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients were identified retrospectively with brain metastases from gyn malignancies between 2004-2019. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the cohort of patients using N (%) and median [IQR] for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Univariate cox proportional hazards regression was performed to evaluate the effect of different prognostic factors on OS. Results: 32 patients presented with brain metastasis from gyn primaries (ovarian/primary peritoneal n = 14, cervical n = 7, uterine n = 11). Median age of initial cancer diagnosis was 62 (54-59). At initial diagnosis 83% of patients were Stage III/IV and underwent surgical management (56%), chemotherapy (100%), or pelvic radiation (31%). The median time from cancer diagnosis to brain metastasis was 18mos. 66% presented with multiple; 34% with isolated brain metastases. The most common presenting symptoms were extremity weakness/numbness (78%), seizures (34%), and headaches (28%). Surgical resection was most often combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and/or whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (Table 1). Median survival from date of brain metastases was longer in patients treated by SRS alone compared to WBRT alone (95 vs 11 mos). Treatment with SRS + Surgery compared to SRS or WBRT alone revealed a trend toward improved OS (p = .06; p = .07). Increased time from initial cancer diagnosis to brain metastasis was associated with improved OS, with one-month increase in time associated with a 7% reduction in risk of death (p = 0.01). Initial cancer treatment, Stage, histology, and number of brain lesions did not affect OS. Conclusions: Patients with brain metastasis secondary to gyn malignancies with the longest OS had the greatest lag time between initial cancer diagnosis and brain metastasis diagnosis. Treatment with multimodal therapy with radiation and surgical resection was associated with the longest OS. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document