scholarly journals Mortality risk from acute aortic dissection among hospital admissions during weekends and holiday season

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0255942
Author(s):  
I-Min Su ◽  
Huei-Kai Huang ◽  
Peter Pin-Sung Liu ◽  
Jin-Yi Hsu ◽  
Shu-Man Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Weekend Effect ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Holiday Season

Background Acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition associated with high mortality rate. Findings from previous studies addressing the “weekend effect” on the mortality rate from an acute aortic dissection mortality have been inconsistent. Furthermore, the effect of admission for acute aortic dissection during the holiday season has not been previously investigated. Objective Our aim was to evaluate the effect of admission for acute aortic dissection during holiday season or weekends on the risk of mortality. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of nationwide cohort data from the Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. We collected data on all adult patients hospitalized for acute aortic dissection between 2001 and 2017 in Taiwan and classified them into the following three groups based on day of admission: holiday season (at least 4 consecutive days; n = 280), weekend (n = 1 041), and weekday (n = 3 109). The following three outcomes were evaluated: in-hospital mortality, 7-day mortality, and 180-day mortality. Results A multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for possible cofounders on the measured outcomes. Compared to weekday admissions for acute aortic dissection, weekend admissions resulted in a 29% increase in the risk of in-hospital death (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.05–1.59; P = 0.0153), with a 25% increase in the 7-day (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.001–1.563; P = 0.0492) and 20% increase in the 180-day mortality risk (aOR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01–1.42; P = 0.0395). Of note, admission over the holiday season did not result in a higher mortality risk than for weekday admissions; this finding, however, might reflect insufficient statistical power on subgroup analysis. Conclusion Patients admitted for acute aortic dissection during the weekends are at higher risk of mortality compared to those admitted on weekdays. Our finding likely reflects inadequate staffing and team experience of weekend staff and can guide healthcare policy makers to improve patient outcomes.

scholarly journals Comparison of Cancer Patients to Non-Cancer Patients among COVID-19 Inpatients at a National Level

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1436
Author(s):  
Alain Bernard ◽  
Jonathan Cottenet ◽  
Philippe Bonniaud ◽  
Lionel Piroth ◽  
Patrick Arveux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
National Level ◽  
Administrative Database ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Hematological Cancer ◽  
Risk Of Death

(1) Background: Several smaller studies have shown that COVID-19 patients with cancer are at a significantly higher risk of death. Our objective was to compare patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with cancer to those without cancer using national data and to study the effect of cancer on the risk of hospital death and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. (2) Methods: All patients hospitalized in France for COVID-19 in March–April 2020 were included from the French national administrative database, which contains discharge summaries for all hospital admissions in France. Cancer patients were identified within this population. The effect of cancer was estimated with logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex and comorbidities. (3) Results: Among the 89,530 COVID-19 patients, we identified 6201 cancer patients (6.9%). These patients were older and were more likely to be men and to have complications (acute respiratory and kidney failure, venous thrombosis, atrial fibrillation) than those without cancer. In patients with hematological cancer, admission to ICU was significantly more frequent (24.8%) than patients without cancer (16.4%) (p < 0.01). Solid cancer patients without metastasis had a significantly higher mortality risk than patients without cancer (aOR = 1.4 [1.3–1.5]), and the difference was even more marked for metastatic solid cancer patients (aOR = 3.6 [3.2–4.0]). Compared to patients with colorectal cancer, patients with lung cancer, digestive cancer (excluding colorectal cancer) and hematological cancer had a higher mortality risk (aOR = 2.0 [1.6–2.6], 1.6 [1.3–2.1] and 1.4 [1.1–1.8], respectively). (4) Conclusions: This study shows that, in France, patients with COVID-19 and cancer have a two-fold risk of death when compared to COVID-19 patients without cancer. We suggest the need to reorganize facilities to prevent the contamination of patients being treated for cancer, similar to what is already being done in some countries.

Impact of GERAADA Score in Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayo Sugiyama ◽  
Hirotaka Watanuki ◽  
Masato Tochii ◽  
Yasuhiro Futamura ◽  
Yuka Kitagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type A ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Postoperative Results ◽  
Entire Study ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Actual Mortality ◽  
Aortic Dissection Type A

Abstract Background Despite continuous developments and advances in the perioperative management of patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), the associated postoperative morbidity and mortality remain high and strongly depend on the preoperative clinical status. The associated postoperative mortality is still hard to predict prior to the surgical procedure. The so-called German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score uses very basic and easily retrievable parameters and was specifically designed for predicting the 30-day mortality rate in patients undergoing surgery for AADA. This study evaluated impact of the GERAADA score in the authors’ institutional results. MethodsAmong 101 acute type A aortic dissection patients treated at our hospital during August 2015–March 2021, the GERAADA was calculated individually and retrospectively. Predicted and actual mortalities were assessed, and independent predicted factors were searched. The primary endpoint was defined as comparison of GERAADA scores and early mortality, and the secondary endpoints were defined as comparison of GERAADA scores and other postoperative results, and comparison of preoperative factors and postoperative results regardless to GERAADA scores.ResultsWhile the overall 30-day mortality for the entire study cohort calculated by the GERAADA score was 14.3 (8.1-77.6) %, the actual mortality rate was 6%. However, the GERAADA score was significantly high in some postoperative complications and showed significant correlation with some peri- and post-operative factors. In addition, factors not belonging to GERAADA score such as time from onset to arrival at the hospital, time from onset to arrival at the operation room, spouse presence, and hemodialysis were significantly associated with 30-day mortality.ConclusionsAlthough the actual mortality was lower than predicted, GERAADA score may impact on the postoperative course. In addition, it would be desirable to add parameters such as the time from onset to arrival, family background, and hemodialysis for further accuracy.

scholarly journals Master of the Masquerade: An Atypical Presentation of Acute Aortic Dissection

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Ramy Mando ◽  
Daniel Tim ◽  
Anthony DeCicco ◽  
Justin Trivax ◽  
Ivan Hanson
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
High Mortality ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Atypical Presentation ◽  
Aggressive Management ◽  
Life Threatening

Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is associated with unacceptably high mortality rate. As such, early diagnosis and aggressive management are essential in order to avoid life-threatening complications. Herein, we report an atypical presentation of AAD and clinical sequelae.

scholarly journals Bilateral testicular pain as an acute aortic dissection symptom

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Mercedes Guarín-Loaiza ◽  
Laura Cristina Nocua-Báez ◽  
Gladys Alfonso-Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type A ◽  
Type B ◽  
Anatomical Distribution ◽  
Testicular Pain ◽  
Great Vessels

Acute aortic dissection is a serious cardiovascular event and the most common acute disease of the great vessels. According to the anatomical distribution of the compromised aorta, the Stanford Group classifies it into type A and type B. Its prognosis depends on its early identification and treatment, as the mortality rate in type A increases rapidly with each hour of delay of diagnosis.Clinical manifestations of aortic dissection may be varied, which makes its early diagnosis difficult. Regarding its diagnosis, genital pain is one of the rarest symptoms. In this paper, the case of a patient who initially attended a health care institution due to acute bilateral testicular pain and was eventually diagnosed with acute aortic dissection is presented.

scholarly journals OR13-03 Understanding Why Older People with Low Trauma Fractures Die Prematurely

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thach Tran ◽  
Dana Bliuc ◽  
Sean O’Donoghue ◽  
Louise Hansen ◽  
Bo Abrahamsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Distal Fracture ◽  
Fracture Types ◽  
Comorbidity Status ◽  
Foot Fractures

Abstract There is increasing evidence that all proximal and not just hip fractures are associated with increased mortality risk. However, the cause of this increased mortality is unknown. We sought to determine the post-fracture trajectories of subsequent hospital admissions and mortality to develop an understanding of why patients with non-hip fractures die prematurely. This nationwide Danish population-based study included all individuals aged 50+ years who sustained an incident fragility fracture between 2001 and 2014. High-trauma fractures or individuals with fracture prior to 2001 were excluded. Fracture patients were matched 1:4 by sex, age and comorbidity status with non-fracture subjects alive at the time of fracture. Comorbidities included 33 unique medical conditions of the Charlson or Elixhauser comorbidity index. We modelled the contribution of specific fractures on the risk of subsequent admissions or death within the following 2 years. There were 212,498 women and 95,372 men with fracture followed by 30,677 and 19,519 deaths, respectively over 163,482 and 384,995 person-years of follow up. Mean age at fracture was 72± 11 for women and 75± 11 for men. Proximal fractures including hip, femur, pelvis, rib, clavicle and humerus had increased mortality compared with their matched non-fracture counterparts with HRs ranging from 1.5-4.0, while distal fractures such as ankle, forearm, hand or foot fractures had similar or lower mortality risk. Almost 75% of men and 60% of women had ≥1 comorbidity. For every additional comorbidity, risk of mortality increased for all fracture types. However, only for proximal fractures did the fracture itself independently increase mortality risk over and above co-morbidity status. The 2-yr post fracture admission and mortality patterns differed between proximal and distal fractures. Proximal, but not distal fracture subjects had greater risk of any major hospital admission (including cardiovascular disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, pneumonia and pulmonary disease) within 2 years compared with their non-fracture counterparts. Distal fractures in general had similar admission patterns as their non-fractured matched counterparts. Furthermore, 2 year mortality risk was increased for proximal fractures whether or not they were admitted to hospital post fracture. By contrast, mortality risk was similar or reduced for distal fractures compared with non-fracture controls. This study has not only confirmed the increased mortality following proximal fractures but has demonstrated differing clinical trajectories between proximal and distal fractures that contribute to this increased mortality. These findings provide important insights as to why proximal fracture subjects die prematurely that may lead to specific avenues for intervention.

scholarly journals Mortality of site-specific cancer in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liwei Ni ◽  
Yuming Long ◽  
Xuya Yuan ◽  
Jianhao Xu ◽  
Jialong Tao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Male Patients

Abstract Background: Numerous studies have reported contradicting results on the relationship between cancer mortality and schizophrenia. Our aim is to quantify the mortality rate of common site-specific cancers among patients with schizophrenia and to synthesize the available research evidence. Method: We performed a systemic search of the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. Studies reporting the mortality rate of different cancer in patients with schizophrenia were included. A random-effects model was applied to calculate the pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Results: Seven studies consisting of a total of 1,162,971 participants with schizophrenia were included in this meta-analysis. Data regarding mortality risk of breast, colon, lung and prostate cancer among schizophrenia patients were subjected to quantitative analysis. Pooled results showed significant increases in mortality risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.97, 95%CI 1.38–2.83), lung cancer (RR = 1.93, 95%CI 1.46–2.54) and colon cancer (RR = 1.69, 95%CI 1.60–1.80) in patients with schizophrenia compared with those in the general population or control group. The mortality risk of prostate cancer increased in male patients, although no significant difference was detected (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 0.79–3.15). Increased risks of mortality from lung and colon cancer were observed in female patients (RR = 2.49, 95%CI 2.40–2.59 and RR = 2.42, 95%CI 1.39–4.22, respectively) and elevated risks of mortality from lung and colon cancer in male patients (RR = 2.40, 95%CI 2.30–2.50 and RR = 1.90, 95%CI 1.71–2.11, respectively) were detected. Conclusions: Individuals with schizophrenia have a significantly high risk of mortality from breast, colon, and lung cancer and a high risk of mortality from prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Lower body ischaemic time is a risk factor for acute kidney injury after surgery for type A acute aortic dissection

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Amano ◽  
Yoshiyuki Takami ◽  
Hiroshi Ishikawa ◽  
Michiko Ishida ◽  
Masato Tochii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Type A ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Lower Body ◽  
Postoperative Aki

Abstract OBJECTIVES Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is known as a risk factor for death after surgery for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection under hypothermic circulatory arrest. It may also adversely affect long-term survival. We searched for modifiable risk factors for postoperative AKI, focusing on lower body ischaemic time. METHODS We reviewed 191 patients undergoing surgical repair for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. The distal anastomosis depended on excluding the primary tear location, resulting in ascending/hemiarch (n = 119), partial arch (n = 18) and total arch replacement (n = 54). We defined an increase in the serum creatinine level to ≧2 times the baseline level as AKI. The incidence of AKI was investigated with multivariate analysis of its risk factors. RESULTS Postoperative AKI was observed in 49 patients (26%), 31% of whom required renal replacement therapy. The overall hospital mortality rate was 8.5%. Postoperative AKI, preoperative shock and organ malperfusion were predictors of hospital death. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis identified age, body mass index, preoperative chronic kidney disease and lower body ischaemic time as risk factors for postoperative AKI. CONCLUSIONS Although surgical repair for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection showed favourable results, the incidence of postoperative AKI is still high, closely associated with hospital death. Lower body ischaemic time should be recognized specifically as a modifiable surgical risk factor for postoperative AKI.

scholarly journals Is seniority of emergency physician associated with the weekend mortality effect? An exploratory analysis of electronic health records in the UK

2019 ◽  
pp. emermed-2018-208114
Author(s):  
Larry Han ◽  
Jason Fine ◽  
Susan M Robinson ◽  
Adrian A Boyle ◽  
Michael Freeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Weekend Effect ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Junior Doctors ◽  
Hazards Model ◽  
Mortality Effect ◽  
The Uk

ObjectiveAdmission to hospital over a weekend is associated with increased mortality, but the underlying causes of the weekend effect are poorly understood. We explore to what extent differences in emergency department (ED) admission and discharge processes, severity of illness and the seniority of the treating physician explain the weekend effect.MethodsWe analysed linked ED attendances to hospital admissions to Cambridge University Hospital over a 7-year period from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013, with 30-day in-hospital death as the primary outcome and discharge as a competing risk. The primary exposure was day of the week of arrival. Subdistribution hazards models controlled for multiple confounders, including physician seniority, calendar year, mode of arrival, triage category, referral from general practice, sex, arrival time, prior attendances and admissions, diagnosis group and age.Results229 401 patients made 424 845 ED attendances, of which 158 396 (37.3%) were admitted to the hospital. The case-mix of admitted patients was more ill at weekends: 2530 (6.4%) admitted at a weekend required immediate resuscitation compared with 6450 (5.4%) admitted on a weekday (p<0.0001). Senior doctors admitted 24.8% of patients on weekdays and 24.0% at weekends, but junior doctors admitted 61.7% of patients on weekdays and 44.2% at weekends. 3947 (3.3%) patients admitted on a weekday and 1454 (3.7%) patients admitted at a weekend died within 30 days. In the adjusted subdistribution hazards model, the HR of in-hospital death was 1.11 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.18) for weekend arrivals. After controlling for confounders, the in-hospital mortality of patients admitted by junior doctors was greater at the weekend (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.15, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.24). In-hospital mortality for patients admitted by senior doctors was not statistically different at the weekend (aHR 1.08, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.19).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the weekend effect was driven by a higher proportion of admitted patients requiring immediate resuscitation at the weekend. Junior doctors admitted a lower proportion of relatively healthy patients at the weekend compared with the weekday, thus diluting the risk pool of weekday admissions and contributing to the weekend effect. Senior doctors’ admitting behaviour did not change at the weekend, and the corresponding weekend effect was reduced.

Results of Immediate Surgical Treatment of All Acute Type A Dissections

Circulation ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 102 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek P. Ehrlich ◽  
M. Arisan Ergin ◽  
Jock N. McCullough ◽  
Steven L. Lansman ◽  
Jan D. Galla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type A ◽  
Distal Anastomosis ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Descending Aorta ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Intimal Tear

Background —Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection is associated with a high mortality rate and incidence of postoperative complications. This study was designed to explore perioperative risk factors for death in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Methods and Results —One hundred twenty-four consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection between 1984 and 1998 were reviewed. All underwent operation with resection of the intimal tear and open distal anastomosis: 107 patients had surgery within 24 hours and 17 patients had surgery within 72 hours of symptom onset. Median age was 62 years (23 to 89); 89 were men. Forty-three patients had ascending aortic replacement only, 72 had hemiarch repair, in 2 the entire arch was replaced, and in 7 replacement included the proximal descending aorta. The aortic valve was replaced in 54 patients, resuspended in 52, and untouched in 18. Hospital mortality rate was 15.3% (19 of 124): of these, 3 patients died during surgery, 4 had fatal rupture of the distal aorta before discharge, and 2 died of malperfusion-related complications. Multivariate analysis revealed age >60, hemodynamic compromise, and absence of hypertension as preoperative indicators of hospital death ( P <0.05); the presence of new neurological symptoms was a significant preoperative risk factor in univariate analysis. Ominous intraoperative factors included contained hematoma and a comparatively low esophageal temperature but not cerebral ischemic time (mean 32 minutes). The site of the intimal tear did not influence outcome, but mortality rate was higher with more extensive resection: 43% with resection including the descending aorta died versus 14% with only ascending aorta or hemiarch replacement. Overall 5- and 10-year survival was 71% and 54%, respectively; among discharged patients (median follow-up 41 months) survival was 84% and 64% versus expected US survival of 92% and 79%. Conclusions —Immediate surgical treatment of all acute type A dissections with resection of the intimal tear and use of hypothermic circulatory arrest for distal anastomosis results in acceptable early mortality rates and excellent long-term survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document