scholarly journals Analisis Isi Pemberitaan Politik tvOne, MetroTV, dan RCTI menjelang Pemilihan Presiden 2019 di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-78
Author(s):  
Muchlis Muchlis
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Message Content ◽  
Evening News ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Political News ◽  
Good Morning ◽  
Television Media ◽  
News Programs

This study aims to describe the tendency of the content of political news messages by television media tvOne, MetroTV, and RCTI ahead of the 2019 presidential election in Indonesia. This study uses a content analysis approach. The results of this study indicate that the tendency of the message content of political news broadcast by television media; (1) tvOne through the news how are you in Indonesia in the morning, the news at noon, and the news in the evening; (2) Metro TV through Indonesian good morning news, afternoon metro; (3) RCTI, through news programs about morning news, afternoon news, and evening news, during March 2019. From the three television media, it was found that news programs were dominated by political reports that discussed presidential candidate pairs. and vice-presidential candidate number 01 (Joko Widodo-Ma'ruf Amin) compared to presidential and vice-presidential candidates serial number 02 (Prabowo Subianto-Sandiaga Uno).

scholarly journals Don’t Republicans Tweet Too? Using Twitter to Assess the Consequences of Political Endorsements by Celebrities

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 144-160
Author(s):  
Jan Zilinsky ◽  
Cristian Vaccari ◽  
Jonathan Nagler ◽  
Joshua A. Tucker
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Hillary Clinton ◽  
Donald Trump ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Political Preferences ◽  
The Social ◽  
Decision To Stay ◽  
Presidential Election Campaign

Michael Jordan supposedly justified his decision to stay out of politics by noting that Republicans buy sneakers too. In the social media era, the name of the game for celebrities is engagement with fans. So why then do celebrities risk talking about politics on social media, which is likely to antagonize a portion of their fan base? With this question in mind, we analyze approximately 220,000 tweets from 83 celebrities who chose to endorse a presidential candidate in the 2016 U.S. presidential election campaign to assess whether there is a cost—defined in terms of engagement on Twitter—for celebrities who discuss presidential candidates. We also examine whether celebrities behave similarly to other campaign surrogates in being more likely to take on the “attack dog” role by going negative more often than going positive. More specifically, we document how often celebrities of distinct political preferences tweet about Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, and Hillary Clinton, and we show that followers of opinionated celebrities do not withhold engagement when entertainers become politically mobilized and do indeed often go negative. Interestingly, in some cases political content from celebrities actually turns out to be more popular than typical lifestyle tweets.

OTHER, UPPITY OBAMA

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryann Erigha ◽  
Camille Z. Charles
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Democratic Party ◽  
American Identity ◽  
Presidential Candidates

AbstractUntil 2008, only White candidates represented either of the two major parties as presidential nominees. Hence, little is known about how race appeals are framed by or against non-White presidential candidates. Barack Obama's election as the Democratic Party nominee allows us to investigate this issue. In this article, we conduct a content analysis of over 160 advertisements from the 2008 U.S. presidential election to examine how race appeals were framed (or countered) by each campaign. We find that the Republican campaign employed implicit racial appeals that played upon stereotypes of non-Whites as “un-American” and “other” and Blacks as “dangerous,” “criminal,” “incompetent,” and “uppity.” In contrast, the Democratic campaign de-emphasized race, portrayed “other” as positive, reinforced American identity, and spoke out against negative advertisements.

scholarly journals “Happy warriors” Revisited: Hedonic and agonic display repertoires of presidential candidates on the evening news

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik P. Bucy ◽  
Maria Elizabeth Grabe
Keyword(s):  
Political Behavior ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Internal State ◽  
Major Party ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Political News ◽  
Facial Displays ◽  
Election Coverage ◽  
General Elections ◽  
The Relationship

Absent from most analyses of political news are detailed assessments of the candidates' nonverbal behavior, which has been shown experimentally to have considerable persuasive influence. Unlike attractiveness and other relatively stable aspects of appearance, facial displays are highly variable and reveal important moment-to-moment information about the emitter's internal state. In this paper we argue that facial displays are influential elements within political news and examine the character of televised candidate displays over four presidential election cycles. The analysis considers coverage of major party nominees shown during the general elections of 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2004 on the major broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC). To motivate our hypotheses, we draw on the biopolitics literature that has identified three classes of displays relevant to the study of nonverbal political behavior: happiness/reassurance, anger/threat, and fear/evasion. The analysis focuses on the relationship between the display types shown in election coverage, the context in which the displays are shown, and candidate standings in the polls.

scholarly journals Strategi Kampanye Joko Widodo dan Ma'ruf Amin dalam Debat Calon Presiden pada Tahun 2019

PERSPEKTIF ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 385-393
Author(s):  
Ribkha Annisa Octovina ◽  
Leo Agustino ◽  
Dede Sri Kartini
Keyword(s):  
Presidential Election ◽  
The Political ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Political Campaign ◽  
Political Debate ◽  
Campaign Strategies ◽  
Campaign Strategy ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
The Media ◽  
Selection Of

This article aims to describe the political campaign strategy of Joko Widodo and Ma'ruf Amin in the presidential candidate debate in the 2019 presidential election. The problem is focused on the campaign strategy carried out by the PDI-P party to support the political debate agenda against the presidential candidates Joko Widodo and Ma'ruf Amin. In order to approach this problem, Nursal's theoretical reference is used to use the theory of political campaign strategy. The selection of this theory in this study is because it is more suitable to describe the findings of political campaign strategies for the candidate pairs Joko Widodo and Ma'ruf Amin in the 2019 presidential candidate debate that can attract sympathy or gain support as described in the preliminary study. The data were collected through interviews and analyzed qualitatively. This study concludes that in the implementation of the presidential candidate debate in the 2019 presidential election, the political campaign strategy applied by PDI Perjungan to support Joko Widodo and Ma'ruf Amin, one of which is the marketing of political products through the mass media. First, strengthen the material. Second, observing the target and determining the target for the political debate. Third, approach the media throughout the media, including media that are affiliated and unaffiliated.

scholarly journals TINDAK TUTUR KOMISIF DAN EKSPRESIF DALAM DEBAT CAPRES-CAWAPRES PADA PILPRES 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Febriani Khatimah Herfani ◽  
Ngusman Abdul Manaf
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Speech Acts ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Presidential Debates ◽  
Expressive Speech ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Data Source ◽  
Presidential Debate

This study aims to: (1) formulate the types of commissive speech acts used by presidential and vice presidential candidates in the presidential and vice presidential debates at the 2019 presidential election, (3) formulate the types of expressive speech acts used by presidential and vice presidential candidates in the presidential and vice presidential debates at the 2019 presidential election, (2) formulating the speech strategy used by presidential and vice presidential candidates in the presidential and vice presidential debates at the 2019 presidential election. This type of research is a qualitative research with descriptive methods. The data source in this study is the speech of the 2019 presidential and vice presidential candidates downloaded via Youtube. Based on the results of data analysis, three findings were concluded. First, the types of commissive speech acts used by presidential and vice-presidential candidates in the presidential and vice presidential debates at the presidential election, namely (1) promising, (2) vowing, (3) offering, (4) swearing, and (5) intending. Second, the types of expressive speech acts that exist in the vice presidential debate in the 2019 presidential election are, (1) congratulate, (2) say thank you, (3) apologize, (4) praise, (5) criticize, (6) insinuate , and (7) complaining. Third, the speech strategy used in the vice presidential candidate debate in the 2019 presidential election, (1) speaking without further ado, (2) speaking with positive politeness politeness, (3) speaking with negative politeness pleasantries, and (4) speak vaguely.

scholarly journals Charismatic and Affective Rhetoric in a Presidential Campaign

2014 ◽  
pp. 120-137
Author(s):  
Sheilesha R. Willis ◽  
Gloria L. Sweida ◽  
Stephanie Glassburn ◽  
Cynthia L. Sherman ◽  
Michelle C. Bligh
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Voting Behavior ◽  
Presidential Elections ◽  
Presidential Campaign ◽  
2008 Presidential Election ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Emotional Language ◽  
Democratic Parties

Although prior research demonstrates that charisma and rhetoric are two determinants of voting behavior, few studies have examined the effects of charismatic rhetoric and affect as they pertain to the outcomes of presidential elections. Using DICTION software for content analysis, 432 pre-convention speeches from the 2008 presidential election were analyzed to explore the effects that charismatic rhetoric and affect have on presidential candidates’ success. Results indicate that there were more similarities than differences in the charismatic and affect-laden rhetoric of successful and unsuccessful presidential candidates in both the Republican and Democratic parties. Overall, the results demonstrate that both successful and unsuccessful presidential candidates used charismatic rhetoric and emotional language to motivate their followers in the 2008 presidential election.

scholarly journals Transitivity Analysis of Jokowi and Prabowo Campaign Speech in Indonesian Presidential Election 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 143
Author(s):  
Khairani Ade Guswita ◽  
Suhardi Suhardi
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Systemic Functional Linguistics ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Functional Linguistics ◽  
Dominant Process ◽  
Material Process ◽  
Process Participant

This study of the transitivity system aims to identify and describe the type of transitivity, namely the process, participant, and circumstance which appeared in Jokowi and Prabowo campaign speech in 2019. The method used was qualitative method and researcher as key instrument in this study. The method used in collecting data was Metode Simak which proposed by Sudaryanto (2018). Data collected were analyzed by using the theory of Halliday (1985), namely Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) which focused on transitivity system. The results of the study based on data analysis show that there are 24 data or about 32% material process as dominant process that found in Jokowi campaign speech, the most dominant participant is actor that found about 15.1% or 23 data , and time as the most dominant of circumstance that found about 21.4% or 9 data. Whereas in Prabowo's campaign speech found that the most dominant process that used is material process about 37.5% or 30 data with the most dominant participant, namely actor and goal that have the same amount of data about 28 data or 18.2%, the circumstance type which is the most dominant used namely place about 11 data or 26.8%. The most dominant transitivity process used by the two presidential candidates shows that the two presidential candidates try to convey things related to the activities or actions that will be done by each presidential candidate if they are elected to become president of Indonesia in 2019-2024 period.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN PESAN POLITIK DALAM KONFERENSI PERS JOKOWI DAN PRABOWO PASCA PENDAFTARAN CAPRES 2019

SUAR BETANG ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Kusno
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
Political Speeches

Presidential and vice presidential candidates, Joko Widodo-Ma’ruf Amin and Prabowo-Sandi have been officialy registered as president and vice president candidates for Indonesia Presidential Election 2019. Both of president candidates gave a political speeches after registering at the KPU. Those speeches become a representation of their perception regarding presidential election 2019. That is why it is so important to reveal their political speech. This research used Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis. They both realize if the registration for presidential election just for the importance of Indonesian. Prabowo just give a different emphasis about KPU which have to guard the presidential election of 2019 that free from cheating. That point based on consideration if Prabowo as the president candidate who ever lose in presidential election of 2014 and has an argument if the defeat caused by cheating. Unfortunately, the commitment of pair of presidential and vice presidential candidate is still far from hope. The fact is everyday the community get a treated of bad political. Political that abuse each other and emmity. There is a parts who played the issues SARA to catch a sympathy the electors to get a dominance. 

scholarly journals ANALISIS SENTIMEN CALON PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN PERIODE 2019-2024 PASCA DEBAT PILPRES DI TWITTER

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Rizka Ardiansyah
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Public Opinion ◽  
Presidential Election ◽  
Social Networking Sites ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Presidential Candidate ◽  
Presidential Candidates ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Sentiment ◽  
Negative Sentiment

Social networking sites, such as Twitter and Facebook are one of the important spaces for political engagement. Twitter or Facebook have become common elements in political campaigns and elections, especially for Indonesia’s presidential election 2019. for the period 2019 - 2024 there are two presidential and vice presidential candidates namely Ir. H. Joko Widodo - Prof. Dr. K.H. Ma'ruf Amin and Lieutenant General (Ret.) H. Prabowo Subianto - H. Sandiaga Uno. B.B.A., M.B.A. the two candidates who ran for the election triggered a lot of related public opinion where the most suitable candidate to become the president of the next period. Public opinion is generally one of the determining factors for presidential candidates who will later win the election. Presidential candidate debate is the efforts of the election commission to facilitate the presidential candidates to introduce their work programs to the public while building public opinion that they are the right people to become leaders of the next period. Although of course, this is not the only major factor that shapes public opinion. The purpose of this study is to summarize the opinions of the people voiced through social media related to the election of candidates for the Indonesian President and Vice President for the period 2019-2024 post debate on the presidential election. While the benefit is to help the community so that they can understand in a broader context such as what the public opinion about presidential candidates, especially on social media Twitter. The results of this study were presidential candidate Joko Widodo - Makruf Amin obtained a 25% positive sentiment, 4.5% negative sentiment and 70.5% neutral sentiment. while the Prabowo Subianto - Sandiaga Uno pair received a 5.1% positive sentiment, 2.5% negative sentiment and 92.4% neutral sentiment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document