scholarly journals Assessment and development of the export potential of the agro-industrial complex of the Far Eastern Federal District

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Tretyak ◽  
Irina Zhupley ◽  
Yulia Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Regional Features ◽  
The World ◽  
Far Eastern

The article discusses the issue of choice at the level of the far Eastern Federal district (FEFD) priority development areas export of products of agro-industrial complex (AIC). The purpose of the study: to assess the export potential of agricultural products of the Far Eastern Federal District in comparison with Russia and the world. The novelty of the study determined that with enough thoroughness in the scientific literature, issues of trade flows exports of agricultural products research of regional features of an assessment and formation of directions of development of export potential of agricultural products represented slightly. To analyze the export potential, the study used the Balassa index, which allows identifying industries that have an export advantage in the production of export-oriented a8groproducts. The authors analyzed the export potential of the region in comparison with the macro- (Russian Federation) and mega- (World) levels; studied the export volumes of the agro-industrial complex of the world, the Russian Federation and the Far Eastern Federal District by product groups in dynamics for 2017–2020. The study made it possible to determine the growth points of the agro-industrial complex of the region in terms of the formation of export potential – commodity groups on which to focus the main attention and investment support. The predominant role of raw material export directions (fish, grain, oilseeds) is shown at the present time. The main problems of realizing the export potential of agricultural products in the Far Eastern Federal District are identified and promising directions for the development of the agro-industrial complex are identified. It is proposed to take into account the results of the export potential assessment when forming the priority directions of the region's foreign economic activity. Attention is focused on the fact that when identifying industry points of growth in the export of agricultural products of the Far Eastern region, one should not ignore possible restrictions due to the diversification of exported product.

scholarly journals Scientific support of the rice growing industry of the agroindustrial complex of the Russian Federation in solving the problems of food security

2020 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 05006
Author(s):  
Vugar Bagirov ◽  
Sergey Treshkin ◽  
Andrey Korobka ◽  
Fedor Dereka ◽  
Sergey Garkusha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Scientific Support ◽  
The World ◽  
Federal Districts ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Agroindustrial Complex ◽  
Far Eastern

According to FAOSTAT, in 2018-2019 rice was planted in 118 countries on an area of 167 million hectares, the annual grain production in the world is about 782 million tons. Rice is the most popular cereal in the diet of the Russian consumer. Rice growing is a small but rather important branch of the agro-industrial complex of the Russian Federation. The main rice producers in the world are China (over 214 million tons), India (over 172 million tons), Indonesia (83 million tons), Bangladesh (56 million tons), Vietnam (44 million tons), Thailand (32 million tons) and Myanmar (25 million tons). In the Russian Federation, rice is grown in three federal districts, in nine subjects: in the Southern Federal District - the Republic of Adygea, Kalmykia, Krasnodar, Astrakhan and Rostov Regions; North Caucasian Federal District - Republics of Dagestan and Chechen; Far Eastern Federal District - Primorsky Territory and the Jewish Autonomous Region. Scientific support of the rice-growing industry in the Russian Federation is carried out by the Federal Scientific Rice Centre.

scholarly journals ROLE OF THE CENTRAL BLACK EARTH REGION IN THE AGRARIAN ECONOMY OF RUSSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
Yuriy Kitaev
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Growth Index ◽  
Negative Trend ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Average Growth ◽  
The Russian Federation

With the aim of developing the national economy in the Russian Federation, economic regionalization has been widely used, which contributes to increasing the economic efficiency of regulating the productive forces in the country. The aim of the study is to assess the place and role of the Central Black Earth region in the economy of the agro-industrial complex of Russia. The research methodology is based on economic-statistical and correlation-regression analyzes. The scientific novelty of the research consists in identifying the patterns of development of the Central Black Earth region as an agrarian region. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that taking into account the revealed patterns when developing strategies for the development of individual sectors of the agro-industrial complex will allow us to overcome the identified negative trend of reducing the production of certain types of agricultural products. The Central Black Earth region occupies a special place among 12 economic regions of Russia. It occupies no more than 1.0% of the total land area of the country, but ensures the production of 16.3% of agricultural products manufactured in the Russian Federation. The share of agricultural production in the gross regional product of the Central Black Earth region in 2019 remained 27.9%, which makes it possible to consider the Black Earth region as a region with a predominance of agaric production. An analysis of the indices of agricultural production in Russia and in the Central Black Earth region showed that the average growth index of agricultural production in 2011-2018 in the Central Black Earth region amounted to 116.1%, however, the dynamics of changes in these indices reflects a negative trend of deceleration, which can be described by a linear equation of the form y = -3.4867x + 131.8. Among the subjects of the Central Black Earth region, the maximum growth in the volume of agricultural production for 2005-2019. observed in the Belgorod region - 8.3 times, and the minimum in the Lipetsk region - 6.8 times

СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НОВЫХ СУБЪЕКТОВ ДВФО ПРИ СРАВНЕНИИ С ДРУГИМИ СУБЪЕКТАМИ ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО ОКРУГА

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Ushakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Socioeconomic Indicators ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern

Аннотация. Республика Бурятия и Забайкальский край указом президента Российской Федерации 3 ноября 2018 года вошли в состав Дальневосточного федерального округа. Эти субъекты имеют свою социальноэкономическую специфику по отношению к другим субъектам по структуре экономики, уровню жизни населения, экономикогеографическому положению. Одна из главных целей работы была сравнить новые субъекты с другими субъектами Дальневосточного федерального округа по структуре экономики и социальноэкономическому положению и его динамики. Оба региона как было установлено имеют схожие структуры экономики с приграничными субъектами юга Дальнего Востока. Они имеют довольно низкие социальноэкономические показатели по отношению к подавляющему большинству субъектов Российской Федерации, так и в особенности среди субъектов Дальневосточного региона находясь наряду с Еврейской автономной областью в числе аутсайдеров. Это было подсчитано на примере одного из коэффициентов сравнения, который показывает степень социальноэкономического развития между субъектами федерального округа. Также на примере этого коэффициента выявлено, что рассматриваемые регионы также уступают значительной части других регионов по динамике социальноэкономических показателей. Оба региона имеют небольшую долю в социально экономических показателях округа, прежде всего за счет слабого развития регионов. Это вызывает и снижение этих показателей в расчете на 1 человека по округу. Был выявлен ряд экономических особенностей и географических факторов характерных для причинноследственной связи низкого социальноэкономического положения и развития Республики Бурятия и Забайкальского края по отношению к другим субъектам федерального округа. На примере структуре экономики регионов указано, что наибольшие социальноэкономические показатели имеют регионы с высокой долей промышленности за счет добычи полезных ископаемых. Обозначен ряд факторов, которые сказываются или должны сказываться положительно на развитии новых субъектов в будущем в составе нового федерального округа. Были подсчитаны изменения социальноэкономических показателей для Дальневосточного федерального округа в результате произошедшего изменения его границ. By a decree of the President of the Russian Federation on November 3, the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory became a part of the Far Eastern Federal District. These subjects have their own socioeconomic specifics relatively to other subjects by the structure of economy, the standard of living of the population, and the economic geographical position. One of the main goals of the work was to compare new subjects with other subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District in terms of the economic structure, a socioeconomic situation, and its dynamics. Both regions were found to have similar economic structures with the border regions of the south of the Far East. They have rather low socioeconomic indicators relatively to the overwhelming majority of the subjects of the Russian Federation, and especially among the subjects of the Far Eastern region, being together with the Jewish Autonomous Region among the outsiders. This was calculated by example of one of the comparison coefficients, which shows the degree of socioeconomic development between the subjects of the Federal district. Besides, by example of this coefficient, it was revealed that the regions under consideration conceded a significant part of other regions in the dynamics of socioeconomic indicators. Both regions have a small share in the socioeconomic indicators of the district, primarily because of weak development of the regions. This causes a decrease in these indicators per 1 person in the district. A number of economic features and geographical factors typical of a causal relationship of a low socioeconomic status and development of the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory relatively to other subjects of the Federal district were identified. By example of the structure of regional economy, it is indicated that, the regions with the highest share of industry have the highest socioeconomic indicators at the expense of mining. A number of factors are indicated that affect or should have a positive effect on the development of new subjects in future as part of a new federal district. The changes in socioeconomic indicators for the Far Eastern Federal District that occurred as a result of the change in its borders have been calculated.

scholarly journals THE SPECIFICS OF THE MODERN APPROACH TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA’S FAR EAST

2020 ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Yuliia A. Nishchimnykh
Keyword(s):  
Urban Development ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Modern Approach ◽  
Demographic Situation ◽  
Sustainable Economy ◽  
Spatial Environment ◽  
Far Eastern

The article considers the socio-demographic situation in the Far Eastern region. The strategy of accelerated development of the Far Eastern Federal District is reviewed in the context of the governmental programs. The need to reorganize the urbanized environments is highlighted. The role of the spatial environment in the Far-Eastern cities as a means of resolving social problems is emphasized. A forecast of resettlement processes in Russia’s Far East is made from the perspective of the region’s sustainable economy development.

ADVANTAGES IN GLOBAL ECONOMY OF RUSSIAN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION OF GRAIN CROPS

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Arable Land ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Main Trend ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
The South ◽  
The World ◽  
The Russian Federation

The Russian Federation is a leading player in the global community, taking the main paths to its formation. The main trend of global economy is globalization, and domestic economies are integrating into the modern system. The Russian Federation is one of the largest countries in the world, located in a variety of climatic zones, and a particularly favorable climate for the development of agricultural sector is in the south. In Russia, 10 % of the world's arable land is located, so more than 80% of the arable land of the Russian Federation is in the Central Volga region, the North Caucasus, the Urals and Western Siberia. Also in the south of Russia melon farming is widespread. The northern regions of the Russian Federation are also subject to successful development with the help of effective agricultural organizations, according to domestic experience, as well as the previous experience of countries such as Finland, Sweden, and Canada, their agriculture mainly operates in similar conditions as the northern and central RF. In October 2014, the Government of the Russian Federation approved a roadmap for import substitution in the agricultural sector for 2016-2017. According to it, the State Program for Agricultural Development for 2013-2020 and the newest prerogative vectors for the development of agro-industrial complex were established and the required resource provision in the amount of 568.3 billion rubles was allocated for 2015-2020, which will help to reduce imports by 1.4 trillion. rub. The ability to enter the world market can be considered as one of the motives for domestic producers of agricultural products and foodstuffs to increase production volumes and measures of state self-sufficiency in agricultural products.

СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НОВЫХ СУБЪЕКТОВ ДВФО ПРИ СРАВНЕНИИ С ДРУГИМИ СУБЪЕКТАМИ ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО ОКРУГА

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Ushakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Socioeconomic Indicators ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern

Аннотация. Республика Бурятия и Забайкальский край указом президента Российской Федерации 3 ноября 2018 года вошли в состав Дальневосточного федерального округа. Эти субъекты имеют свою социальноэкономическую специфику по отношению к другим субъектам по структуре экономики, уровню жизни населения, экономикогеографическому положению. Одна из главных целей работы была сравнить новые субъекты с другими субъектами Дальневосточного федерального округа по структуре экономики и социальноэкономическому положению и его динамики. Оба региона как было установлено имеют схожие структуры экономики с приграничными субъектами юга Дальнего Востока. Они имеют довольно низкие социальноэкономические показатели по отношению к подавляющему большинству субъектов Российской Федерации, так и в особенности среди субъектов Дальневосточного региона находясь наряду с Еврейской автономной областью в числе аутсайдеров. Это было подсчитано на примере одного из коэффициентов сравнения, который показывает степень социальноэкономического развития между субъектами федерального округа. Также на примере этого коэффициента выявлено, что рассматриваемые регионы также уступают значительной части других регионов по динамике социальноэкономических показателей. Оба региона имеют небольшую долю в социально экономических показателях округа, прежде всего за счет слабого развития регионов. Это вызывает и снижение этих показателей в расчете на 1 человека по округу. Был выявлен ряд экономических особенностей и географических факторов характерных для причинноследственной связи низкого социальноэкономического положения и развития Республики Бурятия и Забайкальского края по отношению к другим субъектам федерального округа. На примере структуре экономики регионов указано, что наибольшие социальноэкономические показатели имеют регионы с высокой долей промышленности за счет добычи полезных ископаемых. Обозначен ряд факторов, которые сказываются или должны сказываться положительно на развитии новых субъектов в будущем в составе нового федерального округа. Были подсчитаны изменения социальноэкономических показателей для Дальневосточного федерального округа в результате произошедшего изменения его границ. By a decree of the President of the Russian Federation on November 3, the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory became a part of the Far Eastern Federal District. These subjects have their own socioeconomic specifics relatively to other subjects by the structure of economy, the standard of living of the population, and the economic geographical position. One of the main goals of the work was to compare new subjects with other subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District in terms of the economic structure, a socioeconomic situation, and its dynamics. Both regions were found to have similar economic structures with the border regions of the south of the Far East. They have rather low socioeconomic indicators relatively to the overwhelming majority of the subjects of the Russian Federation, and especially among the subjects of the Far Eastern region, being together with the Jewish Autonomous Region among the outsiders. This was calculated by example of one of the comparison coefficients, which shows the degree of socioeconomic development between the subjects of the Federal district. Besides, by example of this coefficient, it was revealed that the regions under consideration conceded a significant part of other regions in the dynamics of socioeconomic indicators. Both regions have a small share in the socioeconomic indicators of the district, primarily because of weak development of the regions. This causes a decrease in these indicators per 1 person in the district. A number of economic features and geographical factors typical of a causal relationship of a low socioeconomic status and development of the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory relatively to other subjects of the Federal district were identified. By example of the structure of regional economy, it is indicated that, the regions with the highest share of industry have the highest socioeconomic indicators at the expense of mining. A number of factors are indicated that affect or should have a positive effect on the development of new subjects in future as part of a new federal district. The changes in socioeconomic indicators for the Far Eastern Federal District that occurred as a result of the change in its borders have been calculated.

Resource Constituent of Russian Regional Economy

2007 ◽  
pp. 116-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kimelman ◽  
S. Andyushin
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Regional Economy ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Economic Potential ◽  
Resource Model ◽  
The Social ◽  
Regional Economic Policy ◽  
Far Eastern

The article basing upon estimation of the social and economic potential of Russian Federation subjects shows that the resource model of economic development is suitable for nearly half of them. The advantages of this model are described using the example of the Far Eastern Federal District subjects that could be the proof of the necessity of "resource correction" of regional economic policy in Russia.

scholarly journals Contribution of Cyanotoxins to the Ecotoxicological Role of Lichens

Toxins ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 321
Author(s):  
Dobri Ivanov ◽  
Galina Yaneva ◽  
Irina Potoroko ◽  
Diana G. Ivanova
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Modern Times ◽  
Effective Application ◽  
The World ◽  
The Common

The fascinating world of lichens draws the attention of the researchers because of the numerous properties of lichens used traditionally and, in modern times, as a raw material for medicines and in the perfumery industry, for food and spices, for fodder, as dyes, and for other various purposes all over the world. However, lichens being widespread symbiotic entities between fungi and photosynthetic partners may acquire toxic features due to either the fungi, algae, or cyano-procaryotes producing toxins. By this way, several common lichens acquire toxic features. In this survey, recent data about the ecology, phytogenetics, and biology of some lichens with respect to the associated toxin-producing cyanoprokaryotes in different habitats around the world are discussed. Special attention is paid to the common toxins, called microcystin and nodularin, produced mainly by the Nostoc species. The effective application of a series of modern research methods to approach the issue of lichen toxicity as contributed by the cyanophotobiont partner is emphasized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document