scholarly journals THE SPECIFICS OF THE MODERN APPROACH TO URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN RUSSIA’S FAR EAST

2020 ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Yuliia A. Nishchimnykh
Keyword(s):  
Urban Development ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Modern Approach ◽  
Demographic Situation ◽  
Sustainable Economy ◽  
Spatial Environment ◽  
Far Eastern

The article considers the socio-demographic situation in the Far Eastern region. The strategy of accelerated development of the Far Eastern Federal District is reviewed in the context of the governmental programs. The need to reorganize the urbanized environments is highlighted. The role of the spatial environment in the Far-Eastern cities as a means of resolving social problems is emphasized. A forecast of resettlement processes in Russia’s Far East is made from the perspective of the region’s sustainable economy development.

СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НОВЫХ СУБЪЕКТОВ ДВФО ПРИ СРАВНЕНИИ С ДРУГИМИ СУБЪЕКТАМИ ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО ОКРУГА

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Ushakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Socioeconomic Indicators ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern

Аннотация. Республика Бурятия и Забайкальский край указом президента Российской Федерации 3 ноября 2018 года вошли в состав Дальневосточного федерального округа. Эти субъекты имеют свою социальноэкономическую специфику по отношению к другим субъектам по структуре экономики, уровню жизни населения, экономикогеографическому положению. Одна из главных целей работы была сравнить новые субъекты с другими субъектами Дальневосточного федерального округа по структуре экономики и социальноэкономическому положению и его динамики. Оба региона как было установлено имеют схожие структуры экономики с приграничными субъектами юга Дальнего Востока. Они имеют довольно низкие социальноэкономические показатели по отношению к подавляющему большинству субъектов Российской Федерации, так и в особенности среди субъектов Дальневосточного региона находясь наряду с Еврейской автономной областью в числе аутсайдеров. Это было подсчитано на примере одного из коэффициентов сравнения, который показывает степень социальноэкономического развития между субъектами федерального округа. Также на примере этого коэффициента выявлено, что рассматриваемые регионы также уступают значительной части других регионов по динамике социальноэкономических показателей. Оба региона имеют небольшую долю в социально экономических показателях округа, прежде всего за счет слабого развития регионов. Это вызывает и снижение этих показателей в расчете на 1 человека по округу. Был выявлен ряд экономических особенностей и географических факторов характерных для причинноследственной связи низкого социальноэкономического положения и развития Республики Бурятия и Забайкальского края по отношению к другим субъектам федерального округа. На примере структуре экономики регионов указано, что наибольшие социальноэкономические показатели имеют регионы с высокой долей промышленности за счет добычи полезных ископаемых. Обозначен ряд факторов, которые сказываются или должны сказываться положительно на развитии новых субъектов в будущем в составе нового федерального округа. Были подсчитаны изменения социальноэкономических показателей для Дальневосточного федерального округа в результате произошедшего изменения его границ. By a decree of the President of the Russian Federation on November 3, the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory became a part of the Far Eastern Federal District. These subjects have their own socioeconomic specifics relatively to other subjects by the structure of economy, the standard of living of the population, and the economic geographical position. One of the main goals of the work was to compare new subjects with other subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District in terms of the economic structure, a socioeconomic situation, and its dynamics. Both regions were found to have similar economic structures with the border regions of the south of the Far East. They have rather low socioeconomic indicators relatively to the overwhelming majority of the subjects of the Russian Federation, and especially among the subjects of the Far Eastern region, being together with the Jewish Autonomous Region among the outsiders. This was calculated by example of one of the comparison coefficients, which shows the degree of socioeconomic development between the subjects of the Federal district. Besides, by example of this coefficient, it was revealed that the regions under consideration conceded a significant part of other regions in the dynamics of socioeconomic indicators. Both regions have a small share in the socioeconomic indicators of the district, primarily because of weak development of the regions. This causes a decrease in these indicators per 1 person in the district. A number of economic features and geographical factors typical of a causal relationship of a low socioeconomic status and development of the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory relatively to other subjects of the Federal district were identified. By example of the structure of regional economy, it is indicated that, the regions with the highest share of industry have the highest socioeconomic indicators at the expense of mining. A number of factors are indicated that affect or should have a positive effect on the development of new subjects in future as part of a new federal district. The changes in socioeconomic indicators for the Far Eastern Federal District that occurred as a result of the change in its borders have been calculated.

scholarly journals The Population of the Far Eastern Federal District: Realities and Prospects

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-71
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Motrich ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Population Change ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Demographic Development ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Urban And Rural Areas ◽  
Far Eastern

The paper analyzes the current demographic development of the Russian Far East. It shows the nature of the population change in the region (taking into account the Republic of Buryatia and the TRANS-Baikal territory that were included in the FEFD in 2018) in urban and rural areas. The article presents the population dynamics for the administrative centers of the Far Eastern regions and reveals their role in changing the urban population in the corresponding regions of the Far East. The data of three variants of the population forecast in the Far Eastern region are presented and the assumption is made about the possibility of the achievement of corresponding indicators

Professional PR-community in the Russian Far East: identification and self-organization

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-118
Author(s):  
Yu. M. Markina ◽  
◽  
Ya. N. Pestova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Self Organization ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Independent Association ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
The Russian Far East

The article is devoted to the issues related to the study of the process of identification and professional self-organization of public relations specialists in the Far-Eastern region of Russia. This process is studied from the point of view of defining the group identity, group norms, and the activities of professional communities. The empirical basis of analysis was the results of an expert survey of public relations specialists in the Far-Eastern federal district. The authors identify the current professional PR communities of the Russian Far East, identify the motives of their members for more active participation in the communities life. There is an independent association of representatives of professional group due to the grassroots activity «spontaneous self-organization» and the presence of experience in consolidating PR specialists in a specific field (state) with an external actor. It is concluded that today there is a willingness of the self-organized PR community to participate in solving the socially significant issues for the region, the development of inter-sector partnership, as a result of formation of trusting attitude of population to the decisions taken in the region.

СОЦИАЛЬНО-ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ НОВЫХ СУБЪЕКТОВ ДВФО ПРИ СРАВНЕНИИ С ДРУГИМИ СУБЪЕКТАМИ ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОГО ОКРУГА

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Ushakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Socioeconomic Indicators ◽  
Low Socioeconomic ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Far Eastern

Аннотация. Республика Бурятия и Забайкальский край указом президента Российской Федерации 3 ноября 2018 года вошли в состав Дальневосточного федерального округа. Эти субъекты имеют свою социальноэкономическую специфику по отношению к другим субъектам по структуре экономики, уровню жизни населения, экономикогеографическому положению. Одна из главных целей работы была сравнить новые субъекты с другими субъектами Дальневосточного федерального округа по структуре экономики и социальноэкономическому положению и его динамики. Оба региона как было установлено имеют схожие структуры экономики с приграничными субъектами юга Дальнего Востока. Они имеют довольно низкие социальноэкономические показатели по отношению к подавляющему большинству субъектов Российской Федерации, так и в особенности среди субъектов Дальневосточного региона находясь наряду с Еврейской автономной областью в числе аутсайдеров. Это было подсчитано на примере одного из коэффициентов сравнения, который показывает степень социальноэкономического развития между субъектами федерального округа. Также на примере этого коэффициента выявлено, что рассматриваемые регионы также уступают значительной части других регионов по динамике социальноэкономических показателей. Оба региона имеют небольшую долю в социально экономических показателях округа, прежде всего за счет слабого развития регионов. Это вызывает и снижение этих показателей в расчете на 1 человека по округу. Был выявлен ряд экономических особенностей и географических факторов характерных для причинноследственной связи низкого социальноэкономического положения и развития Республики Бурятия и Забайкальского края по отношению к другим субъектам федерального округа. На примере структуре экономики регионов указано, что наибольшие социальноэкономические показатели имеют регионы с высокой долей промышленности за счет добычи полезных ископаемых. Обозначен ряд факторов, которые сказываются или должны сказываться положительно на развитии новых субъектов в будущем в составе нового федерального округа. Были подсчитаны изменения социальноэкономических показателей для Дальневосточного федерального округа в результате произошедшего изменения его границ. By a decree of the President of the Russian Federation on November 3, the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory became a part of the Far Eastern Federal District. These subjects have their own socioeconomic specifics relatively to other subjects by the structure of economy, the standard of living of the population, and the economic geographical position. One of the main goals of the work was to compare new subjects with other subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District in terms of the economic structure, a socioeconomic situation, and its dynamics. Both regions were found to have similar economic structures with the border regions of the south of the Far East. They have rather low socioeconomic indicators relatively to the overwhelming majority of the subjects of the Russian Federation, and especially among the subjects of the Far Eastern region, being together with the Jewish Autonomous Region among the outsiders. This was calculated by example of one of the comparison coefficients, which shows the degree of socioeconomic development between the subjects of the Federal district. Besides, by example of this coefficient, it was revealed that the regions under consideration conceded a significant part of other regions in the dynamics of socioeconomic indicators. Both regions have a small share in the socioeconomic indicators of the district, primarily because of weak development of the regions. This causes a decrease in these indicators per 1 person in the district. A number of economic features and geographical factors typical of a causal relationship of a low socioeconomic status and development of the Republic of Buryatia and the TransBaikal Territory relatively to other subjects of the Federal district were identified. By example of the structure of regional economy, it is indicated that, the regions with the highest share of industry have the highest socioeconomic indicators at the expense of mining. A number of factors are indicated that affect or should have a positive effect on the development of new subjects in future as part of a new federal district. The changes in socioeconomic indicators for the Far Eastern Federal District that occurred as a result of the change in its borders have been calculated.

scholarly journals Five decades long path.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-86
Author(s):  
Svetlana M. Dudarenok ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Far East ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Historical Science ◽  
The Far East ◽  
Academic Center ◽  
Event Series ◽  
History Of ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Far Eastern

This article, based on the current archive of the Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography of the Peoples of the Far East of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, as well as the annual scientific reports, recreates the 50-year history of IHAE, shows the role of its directors in the formation and development of the Institute: Academician of the USSR Academy of Sciences A.I. Krushanov, Academician of the RAS V.L. Larin and Corresponding Member of the RAS N.N. Kradin. Particular attention is paid to a difficult stage in the life of the country and historical science – the period of the 1990s. The liquidation of the CPSU, the fall of the Soviet system and the collapse of the USSR contributed to the crisis of historical science. During this period, the leaders of the IHAE FEB RAS faced quite difficult tasks: to provide funding for scientific research; retain the cadres of professional historians; to develop new methodological approaches and principles for the analysis of historical events and "blind spots" in the history of the Far East; determine the prospects for the future. All these tasks were successfully solved, and by 2000 the Institute regained the role of a scientific center uniting all historians of the Far Eastern region. Introduction. The reasons that led to the need to open an academic center of historical science in Vladivostok are stated: there was a process of intensive development of the region's natural resources; new industrial enterprises and universities were created; Far Eastern cities were renewed, the population grew; the ideological and military confrontation between the two “superpowers” grew, and relations between the USSR and China sharply deteriorated. In these conditions, the role of the humanitarian and ideological component of the social life of the region increased, which was to be formed by historical science. Methods. The content of the article is based on different methods of research, first of all the comparative-genetic method, a consistent presentation of the event series, related to the history of the formation and development of IHAE FEB RAS. Through the application of the narrative method, the history of the Institute's development under its three directors is more widely presented, the specifics of each of the directors and research areas of the staff are displayed. The use of the information method is particularly valuable for building an event series. The method of comparative-historical analysis is also used in the article's presentation. Results. This article was based primarily on the documents of the archive of the Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography of the Peoples of the Far East of the FEB RAS, the annual scientific reports of the Institute and bibliographic indexes of the works of staff of IHAE. This made it possible to present the history of the Institute in all its completeness and contradictions, to show its importance as an academic center of historical science in the Far Eastern region, to determine the main directions of historical research in the future.

scholarly journals Assessment and development of the export potential of the agro-industrial complex of the Far Eastern Federal District

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Tretyak ◽  
Irina Zhupley ◽  
Yulia Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Industrial Complex ◽  
Regional Features ◽  
The World ◽  
Far Eastern

The article discusses the issue of choice at the level of the far Eastern Federal district (FEFD) priority development areas export of products of agro-industrial complex (AIC). The purpose of the study: to assess the export potential of agricultural products of the Far Eastern Federal District in comparison with Russia and the world. The novelty of the study determined that with enough thoroughness in the scientific literature, issues of trade flows exports of agricultural products research of regional features of an assessment and formation of directions of development of export potential of agricultural products represented slightly. To analyze the export potential, the study used the Balassa index, which allows identifying industries that have an export advantage in the production of export-oriented a8groproducts. The authors analyzed the export potential of the region in comparison with the macro- (Russian Federation) and mega- (World) levels; studied the export volumes of the agro-industrial complex of the world, the Russian Federation and the Far Eastern Federal District by product groups in dynamics for 2017–2020. The study made it possible to determine the growth points of the agro-industrial complex of the region in terms of the formation of export potential – commodity groups on which to focus the main attention and investment support. The predominant role of raw material export directions (fish, grain, oilseeds) is shown at the present time. The main problems of realizing the export potential of agricultural products in the Far Eastern Federal District are identified and promising directions for the development of the agro-industrial complex are identified. It is proposed to take into account the results of the export potential assessment when forming the priority directions of the region's foreign economic activity. Attention is focused on the fact that when identifying industry points of growth in the export of agricultural products of the Far Eastern region, one should not ignore possible restrictions due to the diversification of exported product.

THE ROLE OF TRANSBAIKALIA IN THE FAR EASTERN MACROREGION

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. Sysoeva
Keyword(s):  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Local Economy ◽  
Resource Specialization ◽  
One Belt One Road ◽  
Current Economic Situation ◽  
China’S Foreign Policy ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
The Impact

The object of the study is the regions of Transbaikalia joined the Far Eastern Federal District, through which the main connecting infrastructure of the macroregion with the main territory of the country passes. The purpose of the paper is to show the position of Transbaikalia in the system of the emerging economic corridor China-Mongolia-Russia as a part of China's foreign policy initiative "One Belt - One Road" by analyzing the impact of foreign investment on its current economic situation. This corridor will facilitate the access of Chinese companies to the resources of Siberia and the Far East, enhancing the resource specialization of the area. At the same time, the geostrategic functions of the Trans-Baikal territory, given to it by the new Spatial Strategy of the Russian Federation, require strengthening its own economic potential through the development and diversification of the local economy and horizontal ties between the subjects of the macroregion.

Tax debt as a threat to the economic security of the Russian Far East

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-242
Author(s):  
V.A. Yakimova ◽  
A.A. Orekhova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Far East ◽  
Consumer Price Index ◽  
Far East ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Economic Security ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Correlation And Regression Analysis ◽  
Debt Collection ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
The Russian Far East

Subject. The article addresses the tax liabilities of taxpayers registered in the subjects of the Far Eastern Federal District, which should be paid to the consolidated budget of the Russian Federation, as well as the factors of the said debt growth. Objectives. Our aim is to assess the level of tax debt of regions of the Russian Far East and identify the correlation between the factors and the amount of tax debt. Methods. The study rests on methods of analysis, generalization, grouping, systematization, and the correlation and regression analysis. Results. We analyzed the level of tax debt for the entire Far Eastern Federal District and by region, identified factors affecting the growth of tax debt therein. The paper assesses the structure of tax debt by type of taxes and activity of debtors. The unveiled factors may help control changes in the size of tax debt in the Russian Far East and develop effective measures to improve the debt collection. Conclusions. The study shows that there is an increase in the tax debt in the regions of the Russian Far East, in the VAT in particular. The factor analysis revealed that the volume of sales of wholesale enterprises, investment in fixed capital, the consumer price index have the largest impact on the amount of tax debt.

State strategy for the accelerated development of the electric power industry in the Far East of the USSR (1964—1991): historical experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Aleksey Maklyukov
Keyword(s):  
Electric Power ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Far East ◽  
Electric Power Industry ◽  
Power Industry ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Regional Energy ◽  
The Far East ◽  
State Strategy ◽  
Far Eastern

The article examines the historical aspects of the formation and implementation of the state strategy for the accelerated growth of the electric power industry in the Far East of the USSR in 1964—1991. The problems of power supply of the Far Eastern region of the country are analyzed, programs for the development of the regional electric power industry are considered, the difficulties of their implementation are revealed, structural changes in the industry and the results of electrification of the region are characterized. The author notes that the problems of regional energy supply had not been solved until the end of the Soviet era. The Far Eastern electric power industry continued to be a costly and lagging industry, slowing down the socio-economic development of the region.

The Russian Far East: from a depressed region to the territory of the future

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ol'ga Nikolaychuk
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Russian Far East ◽  
Far East ◽  
Environmental Problems ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
The Far East ◽  
The Future ◽  
Bilateral Cooperation ◽  
Far Eastern ◽  
The Russian Far East

The monograph presents the search for solutions to the problems of the Far Eastern region. The proximity of China and the remoteness from the center of Russia make us look for effective measures to overcome the problems of settling the Far East in the context of sustainable economic development of modern Russia. The paper analyzes the problems of the Far East: in industry, agriculture, forestry, energy problems, environmental problems, and provides recommendations for their solution. Considerable attention is paid to migration problems. The experience of China is studied through the prism of bilateral cooperation with Russia. It is intended for students, masters, postgraduates, researchers dealing with issues of macroeconomic regulation and forecasting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document