scholarly journals The test of emotional intelligence — a russian-speaking method

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Sergienko ◽  
E.A. Khlevnaya ◽  
I.I. Vetrova ◽  
A.A. Nikitina
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Culturally Specific ◽  
Process Information ◽  
Satisfactory Level ◽  
Russian Version ◽  
Sociocultural Differences ◽  
Standardization Process

The paper describes the work on the adaptation of the MSCEIT v.2.0 methodology and the development of other methods within the framework of the model of emotional intelligence as ability that diminish sociocultural differences and specificity of stimuli when used in samples other than American ones. The article refers to the procedure for development and standardization of a new reliable psychodiagnostic Russian-speaking method for measurement of the level of development of emotional intelligence of a person. The TEI-method is based on the model of emotional intelligence as an ability by J. Mayer, P. Salovey and D. Caruso and the psychoevolutionary theory of emotions by R. Plutchik. According to the ability model, EI is defined as the ability to process information contained in emotions. In the process of creating a new methodology for measuring emotional intelligence — the TEI-method — the shortcomings of the standardization process of the Russian version of MSCEIT v.2.0 were identified, most of which were culturally specific. These shortcomings were taken into account. 1007 people aged 20 to 72 years (487 men and 520 women, average age 35.9 years) took part in the psychometric testing of the TEI-method. The differences of the TEI and the MSCEIT v.2.0 are described. The TEI-method demonstrates a satisfactory level of basic psychometric indicators of validity and reliability.

Psychometric Testing of the Health Care Evidence-Based Practice Assessment Tool

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 485-498
Author(s):  
Martha R. Sleutel ◽  
Celestina Barbosa-Leiker ◽  
Marian Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Health Care Outcomes ◽  
Optimal Health

Background and Purpose: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is essential to optimal health care outcomes. Interventions to improve use of evidence depend on accurate assessments from reliable, valid, and user-friendly tools. This study reports psychometric analyses from a modified version of a widely used EBP questionnaire, the information literacy for nursing practice (ILNP). Methods: After content validity assessments by nurse researchers, a convenience sam ple of 2,439 nurses completed the revised 23-item questionnaire. We examined internal consistency and used factor analyses to assess the factor structure. Results: A modified 4-factor model demonstrated adequate fit to the data. Cronbach’s alpha was .80–.92 for the subscales. Conclusions: The shortened ILNP (renamed Healthcare EBP Assessment Tool or HEAT) demonstrated adequate content validity, construct validity, and reliability.

Development and Psychometric Testing of a Self-Rated Scale Based on National Nursing Core Competency Standards

2021 ◽  
pp. JNM-D-20-00049
Author(s):  
Al D. Biag ◽  
Vanessa L. Belen
Keyword(s):  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Core Competency ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Leadership And Management ◽  
Five Dimensions ◽  
Leadership Management ◽  
Client Care ◽  
Research Competencies ◽  
Item Scale

Background and PurposeThe objectives of this study were to develop a National Nursing Core Competency Standards (NNCCS)-based instrument and determine its construct validity and internal consistency reliability.MethodsA methodologic research design was used to validate the 59-item scale based on the responses of 600 nurses. The scale items were culled from the client care, leadership and management, and research competencies identified in the NNCCS.ResultsThe results of the analyses confirmed 53 items and gave rise to a five-factor solution. The five dimensions are leadership, management, research, ethico-legal, and strategic competencies.ConclusionsThe seminal psychometric testing provided an evidence of acceptable validity and reliability of the proposed instrument. Further testing was recommended to accrue the psychometric soundness of the instrument.

Physical Activity Health Literacy in Iranian Older Adults: Development and Psychometric Testing

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Moeini Babak ◽  
Barati Majid ◽  
Heidarimoghadam Rashid ◽  
Tapak Leili ◽  
Parsamajd Shahryar
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Health Literacy ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Two Phases

Inadequate health literacy decreases physical activity. This study aimed to develop and examine psychometrics of physical activity health literacy in Iranian older adults. This methodological work was conducted in two phases. Phase 1 consisted of extensive studies review and qualitative study to extract and design the items. The psychometrics were measured in Phase 2 included content, faceconstruct validities, reliability, and stability. The collected data were analyzed in SPSS (version 25.0) and AMOS (version 24.0). The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed four factors— information evaluation, reading skill, perception, and decision making—and used information that explained 70.08% of the variance. The model’s fitness was supported by confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency based on Cronbach’s alpha was .89 with composite reliability >0.85. Stability was confirmed through the test–retest method and intraclass correlation coefficient (.89–1). Psychometrics of physical activity health literacy in Iranian older adults supported validity and reliability of the tool.

Psychometric Testing of the Pap Smear Belief Questionnaire: Measuring Women’s Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Cervical Cancer Screening

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly Ackerson ◽  
Lisa Stines Doane
Keyword(s):  
Pap Smear ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Psychometric Scales ◽  
Measure Methods ◽  
Good Internal Consistency

Background and Purpose: Some women avoid routine Pap testing because of negative attitudes and beliefs. The ability to measure these factors is limited by lack of valid and reliable tools. Therefore, this article describes steps taken to test a measure. Methods: Validity and reliability testing of psychometric scales was conducted. Results: Sample consisted of 344 women. Using principal component analysis resulted in 4 components: Exam-Related Factors, Benefits, Vulnerability, and Risks and Barriers. Revised scale included 28 items explaining 46% variance, with good internal consistency (α = .84). Women who did not routinely screen exhibited significantly more negativity. Conclusions: The measure demonstrates validity and reliability across different groups of women and can be used to inform the design of individualized interventions to promote repeat screening.

scholarly journals Test method for assessing the emotional intelligence of adolescents (MSCEIT-YRV)

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 73-84
Author(s):  
E.A. Sergienko ◽  
E.A. Khlevnaya ◽  
T.S. Kiseleva
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Test Method ◽  
General Level ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Test Standardization ◽  
Gender And Age Differences ◽  
Understanding Emotions ◽  
Using Data

This paper contains a description of the task methodology for assessing the level of development of emotional intelligence in adolescents aged 10 to 18 years MSCEIT–YRV (Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test – Youth Research Version). The paper provides main data on the adaptation of the methodology to the Russian-speaking sample. Adaptation and psychometric testing of the methodology were carried out using data from 996 adolescents aged 10 to 18 years (430 boys and 566 girls, mean age 13,3 years). This methodology provides information on the general level of development of emotional intelligence, indicators of the Experiential and Strategic domains of emotional intelligence and scores for four abilities (identification of emotions, facilitation of thought, understanding emotions and emotion management). The main psychometric indicators of reliability and validity of MSCEIT-YRV meet the requirements of test standardization. The paper also describes gender and age differences in emotional intelligence, shows a comparison of normative samples for the English and Russian versions of the MSCEIT–YRV method.

Psychometric Testing of the Persian Version of the Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale–Revised

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. E162-E172
Author(s):  
Neda Mirbagher Ajorpaz ◽  
Mansoureh Zagheri Tafreshi ◽  
Jamileh Mohtashami ◽  
Farid Zayeri ◽  
Zahra Rahemi
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Competence Scale ◽  
Fit Index

The clinical competence of nursing students in operating room (OR) is an important issue in nursing education. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale–Revised (PPCS-R) instrument. This cross-sectional study was conducted across 12 universities in Iran. The psychometric properties and factor structure of the PPCS-R for OR students was examined. Based on the results of factor analysis, seven items were removed from the original version of the scale. The fitness indices of the Persian scale include comparative fit index (CFI) 5 .90, goodness-of-fit-index (GFI) 5 .86, adjusted goodness-of-fit index (AGFI) 5 .90, normed fit index (NFI) 5 .84, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) 5 .04. High validity and reliability indicated the scale’s value for measuring perceived perioperative competence of Iranian OR students.

Instruments That Measure Nurses’ Knowledge About Diabetes: An Integrative Review

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Francisco
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Integrative Review ◽  
Basic Knowledge ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Replication Studies ◽  
Prevalent Disease ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

Background and Purpose: Diabetes mellitus is an increasingly prevalent disease among hospitalized patients. Educators are challenged to build evidence-based programs for nurses based on sound nursing needs assessments using valid and reliable measures. The purpose of this integrative review is to examine instruments that measure nurses’ knowledge about diabetes. Methods: The Databases PubMed (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for articles published between 1983 and 2012 using the keywords: diabetes knowledge; diabetes mellitus; diabetes self-management, nurse, and nursing knowledge. Fifteen articles reflecting the psychometric properties of 7 published instruments were reviewed. Results: The most commonly used instruments are the Diabetes Basic Knowledge Test (DBKT) and Diabetes Self-Report Test (DSRT). Several replication studies using the DBKT and DSRT did not consistently report reliability and validity measures. Five additional investigator-developed tools also lack strong validity and reliability measures. Conclusions: The findings suggest the need for continued development and psychometric testing of instruments to measure nurses’ knowledge about diabetes.

scholarly journals Validity and reliability of the Korean version of self-care of heart failure index

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Shil Kim ◽  
Minjeong An ◽  
Hyojeong Seo ◽  
Seon Young Hwang ◽  
Jae Lan Shim
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Self Care ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Failure Index ◽  
Korean Version ◽  
Reliability Estimates ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Therapeutic Recommendations

Purpose: Self-care and associated decisions for therapeutic recommendations have been a focus of attention recently in Korea. The purpose of this study was to address the dimensionality and reliability of a Korean version of Self-care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI v.6.2), a measure of self-care of patients with heart failure within a clinical context.Methods: The study sample completed 120 surveys that consisted of demographic variables and the SCHFI v.6.2, which was created to measure self-care maintenance, self-care management, and self-care confidence in HF patients. Confirmatory factor analysis using Mplus verified a robust structural fit of the three dimensionality for each subscale.Results: Self-care maintenance, CFI = .92, TLI = .88, SRMR = .06, RMSEA = .07; self-care management, CFI = .93, TLI = .78, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .24; self-care confidence, CFI = .95, TLI = .92, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .13. Multidimensionality yielded the self-care maintenance scale having 4-factor structures, while each self-care management and confidence scale had a unidimensionality. Reliability estimates using methods compatible with each scale’s dimensionality were adequate to high, ranging from .71 to .96.Conclusions: Psychometric testing of the SCHFI demonstrates a sound model fit, with desirable reliability estimates given each scale dimensionality, using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and alternative options.

Psychometric Evaluation of the Turkish Version of the Zarit Burden Interview in Family Caregivers of Inpatients in Medical and Surgical Clinics

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadiye Özer ◽  
Afife Yurttaş ◽  
Rahşan Çevik Akyıl
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Psychometric Testing ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Turkish Version ◽  
Zarit Burden Interview ◽  
Convenience Sampling

The aim of this study was to adapt the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) to family caregivers of inpatients in medical and surgical clinics to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version. The study design was descriptive and methodological. A total of 223 family caregivers providing care to patients for at least 1 week in clinics were selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Turkish translation of the ZBI. The psychometric testing of the adapted instrument was carried out to establish internal consistency, interitem correlation, and construct validity. The content validity procedure resulted in a final scale comprising 18 items. Cronbach’s alpha was .82. Factor analysis yielded one factor. The Turkish version of the ZBI adapted to the clinics can be used as a one-factor tool.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document