scholarly journals Spanish Society vision of Drug challenge tests

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Audicana ◽  
N Ortega ◽  
T Lobera ◽  
N Blanca ◽  
B De la Parte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Exposure Test ◽  
Immunological Mechanisms ◽  
Specialized Care ◽  
Drug Challenge ◽  
The Individual

The controlled drug exposure test (DPT) is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of drug allergy. Drug-induced adverse reactions (ADRs) are a growing reason for consultation in both primary and specialized care. Allergology consultations in Spain are the ones that usually study these ADRs and rule out immunological mechanisms involved in up to 90% of the cases consulted. An adequate approach to these cases has an obvious impact on the costs and efficacy of the treatments required by other specialists, so that if we did not use DPTs, patients would require more expensive, more toxic and less effective treatments in most of the cases. In recent years, a large number of new drugs have been developed and this document is intended to be a practical guide in the management of PDT with the vision of the Spanish Allergology Society. Diagnostic work begins with a detailed history of the patient. Skin tests are only useful for some medications, and in most cases the diagnosis can only be confirmed by DPT. Although there is usually cross-reactivity, DPTs can confirm the diagnosis and also help to find a tolerable alternative drug. The individual management of patients in a programmed way, taking into account both the type of drug to be studied and the patient's comorbidities, usually allows a solution to be found for the majority of patients.

Early Biomarkers for Severe Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 3829-3839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Ariza ◽  
Maria J. Torres ◽  
Carmen Moreno-Aguilar ◽  
Rubén Fernández-Santamaría ◽  
Tahia D. Fernández
Keyword(s):  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Early Biomarkers ◽  
Immunological Mechanisms ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions ◽  
Delayed Reactions

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are typically classified into immediate and delayed reactions based on the time interval between drug exposure and onset of symptoms. Clinical manifestations range from mild to severe and life-threatening reactions. The most severe clinical entities are anaphylaxis and anaphylactic shock for immediate reactions, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions such as Steven Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis for delayed reactions. The diagnosis is complex and challenging, as drug provocation tests and even skin tests can be very risky procedures, which makes them not recommended. Therefore, it is necessary to search for useful early biomarkers to manage the diagnosis of these reactions. These biomarkers could be useful to determine the clinical entity, but not to identify the culprit drug. Some of the currently available biomarkers are few genetic associations of drug allergy with polymorphisms of human leukocyte antigen (HLA), the detection of inflammatory and lipid mediators in serum, or the detection of cytokines, chemokines, and cytotoxic markers in skin biopsies. In this literature review, it has been summarize the immunological mechanisms involved in severe reactions, both immediate and delayed, and different early biomarkers: those currently used for the diagnosis of these reactions as well as possible early biomarkers that could be useful with further studies to standardize their clinical use.

scholarly journals Quinolone Allergy

Pharmacy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edoabasi U. McGee ◽  
Essie Samuel ◽  
Bernadett Boronea ◽  
Nakoasha Dillard ◽  
Madison N. Milby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Provocation Test ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
In Vitro Tests ◽  
Allergic Reactions ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Delayed Reaction

Quinolones are the second most common antibiotic class associated with drug-induced allergic reactions, but data on quinolone allergy are scarce. This review article discusses the available evidence on quinolone allergy, including prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, cross-reactivity, and management of allergic reactions. Although the incidence of quinolone allergy is still lower than beta-lactams, it has been increasingly reported in recent decades, most likely from its expanded use and the introduction of moxifloxacin. Thorough patient history remains essential in the evaluation of quinolone allergy. Many diagnostic tools have been investigated, but skin tests can yield false-positive results and in vitro tests have not been validated. The drug provocation test is considered the test of choice to confirm a quinolone allergy but is not without risk. Evidence regarding cross-reactivity among the quinolones is limited and conflicting. Quinolone allergy can be manifested either as an immediate or delayed reaction, but is not uniform across the class, with moxifloxacin posing the highest risk of anaphylaxis. Quinolone should be discontinued when an allergic reaction occurs and avoided in future scenarios, but desensitization may be warranted if no alternatives are available.

scholarly journals The Immunological Mechanisms and Immune-Based Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhui Liu ◽  
Xiangchang Zeng ◽  
Yating Liu ◽  
Jinfeng Liu ◽  
Chaopeng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Liver Injury ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Drug Induced Liver Injury ◽  
Cellular Events ◽  
Immunological Mechanisms ◽  
Close Relationship ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has become one of the major challenges of drug safety all over the word. So far, about 1,100 commonly used drugs including the medications used regularly, herbal and/or dietary supplements, have been reported to induce liver injury. Moreover, DILI is the main cause of the interruption of new drugs development and drugs withdrawn from the pharmaceutical market. Acute DILI may evolve into chronic DILI or even worse, commonly lead to life-threatening acute liver failure in Western countries. It is generally considered to have a close relationship to genetic factors, environmental risk factors, and host immunity, through the drug itself or its metabolites, leading to a series of cellular events, such as haptenization and immune response activation. Despite many researches on DILI, the specific biomarkers about it are not applicable to clinical diagnosis, which still relies on the exclusion of other causes of liver disease in clinical practice as before. Additionally, circumstantial evidence has suggested that DILI is mediated by the immune system. Here, we review the underlying mechanisms of the immune response to DILI and provide guidance for the future development of biomarkers for the early detection, prediction, and diagnosis of DILI.

Drug-Induced Agranulocytosis: A Mini Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-59
Author(s):  
Pavithra D ◽  
Praveen D ◽  
Vijey Aanandhi M
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Genetic Manipulation ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Serious Adverse Event ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
The Individual

Agranulocytosis is also known to be granulopenia, causing neutropenia in circulating blood streams .The destruction of white blood cells takes place which leads to increase in the infection rate in an individual where immune system of the individual is suppressed. The symptoms includes fever, sore throat, mouth ulcers. These are commonly seen as adverse effects of a particular drug and are prescribed for the common diagnostic test for regular monitoring of complete blood count in an admitted patient. Drug-induced agranulocytosis remains a serious adverse event due to occurrence of severe sepsis with deep infection leading to pneumonia, septicaemia, and septic shock in two/third of the patient. Antibiotics seem to be the major causative weapon for this disorder. Certain drugs mainly anti-thyroid drugs, ticlopidine hydrochloride, spironolactone, clozapine, antileptic drugs (clozapine), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, dipyrone are the potential causes. Bone marrow insufficiency followed by destruction or limited proliferative bone marrow destruction takes place. Chemotherapy is rarely seen as a causative agent for this disorder. Genetic manipulation may also include as one of the reason. Agranulocytosis can be recovered within two weeks but the mortality and morbidity rate during the acute phase seems to be high, appropriate adjuvant treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics are prerequisites for the management of complicated neutropenia. Drugs that are treated for this are expected to change as a resistant drug to the patient. The pathogenesis of agranulocytosis is not yet known. A comprehensive literature search has been carried out in PubMed, Google Scholar and articles pertaining to drug-induced agranulocytosis were selected for review.

scholarly journals Immune-Mediated Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Immunogenetics and Experimental Models

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 4557
Author(s):  
Alessio Gerussi ◽  
Ambra Natalini ◽  
Fabrizio Antonangeli ◽  
Clara Mancuso ◽  
Elisa Agostinetto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Injury ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
Clinical Event ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Drug Induced Liver Injury ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Liver Injuries ◽  
Immunological Mechanisms ◽  
Molecular Aspects ◽  
Therapeutic Tools

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a challenging clinical event in medicine, particularly because of its ability to present with a variety of phenotypes including that of autoimmune hepatitis or other immune mediated liver injuries. Limited diagnostic and therapeutic tools are available, mostly because its pathogenesis has remained poorly understood for decades. The recent scientific and technological advancements in genomics and immunology are paving the way for a better understanding of the molecular aspects of DILI. This review provides an updated overview of the genetic predisposition and immunological mechanisms behind the pathogenesis of DILI and presents the state-of-the-art experimental models to study DILI at the pre-clinical level.

scholarly journals Antipsychotics in routine treatment are minor contributors to QT prolongation compared to genetics and age

2021 ◽  
pp. 026988112110034
Author(s):  
Leif Hommers ◽  
Maike Scherf-Clavel ◽  
Roberta Stempel ◽  
Julian Roth ◽  
Matthias Falter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qt Interval ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Cardiac Repolarization ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Serum Concentrations ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Main Determinants ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Polygenic Variation

Background: Drug-induced prolongation of cardiac repolarization limits the treatment with many psychotropic drugs. Recently, the contribution of polygenic variation to the individual duration of the QT interval was identified. Aims: To explore the interaction between antipsychotic drugs and the individual polygenic influence on the QT interval. Methods: Retrospective analysis of clinical and genotype data of 804 psychiatric inpatients diagnosed with a psychotic disorder. The individual polygenic influence on the QT interval was calculated according to the method of Arking et al. Results: Linear regression modelling showed a significant association of the individual polygenic QT interval score (ßstd = 0.176, p < 0.001) and age (ßstd = 0.139, p < 0.001) with the QTc interval corrected according to Fridericia’s formula. Sex showed a nominal trend towards significance (ßstd = 0.064, p = 0.064). No association was observed for the number of QT prolonging drugs according to AZCERT taken. Subsample analysis ( n = 588) showed a significant association of potassium serum concentrations with the QTc interval (ßstd = −0.104, p = 0.010). Haloperidol serum concentrations were associated with the QTc interval only in single medication analysis ( n = 26, ßstd = 0.101, p = 0.004), but not in multivariate regression analysis. No association was observed for aripiprazole, clozapine, quetiapine and perazine, while olanzapine and the sum of risperidone and its metabolite showed a negative association. Conclusions: Individual genetic factors and age are main determinants of the QT interval. Antipsychotic drug serum concentrations within the therapeutic range contribute to QTc prolongation on an individual level.

The platelet P2Y12 receptor for adenosine diphosphate: congenital and drug-induced defects

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (7) ◽  
pp. 2102-2112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Cattaneo
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Function ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Adenosine Diphosphate ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
P2y12 Inhibitors ◽  
Major Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Platelet Receptor ◽  
Net Clinical Benefit

Abstract P2Y12, the Gi-coupled platelet receptor for adenosine diphosphate (ADP), plays a central role in platelet function. Patients with congenital P2Y12 defects display a mild to moderate bleeding diathesis, characterized by mucocutaneous bleedings and excessive post-surgical and post-traumatic blood loss. Defects of P2Y12 should be suspected when ADP, even at high concentrations (≥ 10μM), is unable to induce full, irreversible platelet aggregation. Tests that evaluate the degree of inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by ADP should be used to confirm the diagnosis. Drugs that inhibit P2Y12 are potent antithrombotic drugs, attesting the central role played by P2Y12 in platelet thrombus formation. Clopidogrel, the most widely used drug that inhibits P2Y12, is effective both in monotherapy and in combination with acetylsalicylic acid. The most important drawback of clopidogrel is its inability to inhibit adequately P2Y12-dependent platelet function in approximately one-third of patients who are therefore not protected from major cardiovascular events. New drugs, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor, which effectively inhibit P2Y12 in the majority of patients, proved to be more efficacious than clopdidogrel in preventing major cardiovascular events. Although they increase the incidence of major bleedings, the net clinical benefit is in favor of the new P2Y12 inhibitors.

scholarly journals Sex Differences in Drug-Induced Arrhythmogenesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Peirlinck ◽  
Francisco Sahli Costabal ◽  
Ellen Kuhl
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Specific Response ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Tissue Conductivity ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Drug Safety Evaluation ◽  
Qt Intervals ◽  
Drug Concentrations

The electrical activity in the heart varies significantly between men and women and results in a sex-specific response to drugs. Recent evidence suggests that women are more than twice as likely as men to develop drug-induced arrhythmia with potentially fatal consequences. Yet, the sex-specific differences in drug-induced arrhythmogenesis remain poorly understood. Here we integrate multiscale modeling and machine learning to gain mechanistic insight into the sex-specific origin of drug-induced cardiac arrhythmia at differing drug concentrations. To quantify critical drug concentrations in male and female hearts, we identify the most important ion channels that trigger male and female arrhythmogenesis, and create and train a sex-specific multi-fidelity arrhythmogenic risk classifier. Our study reveals that sex differences in ion channel activity, tissue conductivity, and heart dimensions trigger longer QT-intervals in women than in men. We quantify the critical drug concentration for dofetilide, a high risk drug, to be seven times lower for women than for men. Our results emphasize the importance of including sex as an independent biological variable in risk assessment during drug development. Acknowledging and understanding sex differences in drug safety evaluation is critical when developing novel therapeutic treatments on a personalized basis. The general trends of this study have significant implications on the development of safe and efficacious new drugs and the prescription of existing drugs in combination with other drugs.

scholarly journals Allergy to cephalosporin antibiotics in children

2003 ◽  
Vol 131 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 127-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Atanaskovic-Markovic ◽  
Branimir Nestorovic
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Reaction ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Allergic Reactions ◽  
First Line ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Cephalosporin Antibiotics ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Common Infections

A particular problem is the safety of administering cephalosporins to penicillin-allergic children, because cephalosporin allergenic determinants have not been properly identified. Cephalosporin antibiotics are widely used to treat common infections and are often the first-line prophylaxis before many types of surgery. So the arm of this study is to determine the frequency of allergic reactions of anaphylactic type to cephalosporins and their cross-reactivity with penicillins. At University Children?s Hospital in Belgrade a group of 1,170 children with suspected anaphylactic allergic reaction to penicillins and/or cephalosporins were tested for the last eight years. Skin tests were performed with standard concentration of penicillins and cephalosporins. In children where skin tests were negative single-blind placebo-controlled challenges were performed. In case of positive skin tests further examinations were interrupted and the children were considered allergic to that drug. The frequency of anaphylactic allergic reactions to cephalosporins is 0.2 % to 17 %, and depends on cephalosporins generation. The cross-reactivity between cephalosporins and penicillins is 0.1 % to 14.5 %, and among cephalosporins is 0 % to 11.7 %.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document