LEGAL RISKS OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE PANDEMIC PERIOD

2020 ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
N. A. Razveykina ◽  
◽  
E. O. Paulova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Social Institutions ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Theoretical Concept ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Risks ◽  
Coronavirus Infection ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences

One of the global challenges of 2020 was the spread of the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19), which turned out to be the most severe stressful factor for all spheres of public relations. The pandemic contributed to an increase in the number of risks, some of which caused evident harm to many social institutions and systems, and some risks were an incentive for their forced rapid development. The paper studies the risks in the field of criminal justice to recognize typical legal risks and identify new ones caused by the pandemic period. The study identified the existing legal risks in the sphere of criminal proceedings, found out the factors causing additional legal risks during a pandemic, and the legal consequences of such risks. In the study, the authors adhere to the general theoretical concept of risk as a legal phenomenon capable of generating favorable and unfavorable legal consequences. The authors agree with the recognition of the risky nature of the criminal procedure and the right to risk as a resource necessary for the implementation of criminal procedural functions. In the aggregate, it is possible to refer risks in criminal procedure to the procedural risks and to distinguish typical ones among them: the risk of making procedural decisions, risk of performing the defender’s function, professional risk in the investigator’s activity, and the corruption risk. The authors propose to classify specific risks of the pandemic period depending on the resulting consequences, into negative and positive ones. The paper lists some of the most obvious risks of criminal proceedings that have arisen in the context of the spread of the new coronavirus infection.

PROBLEM ASPECTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL NORMS OF PROTECTION OF THE VICTIMS FROM CRIME

2020 ◽  
pp. 72-76
Author(s):  
Яна Валерьевна Самиулина
Keyword(s):  
Preventive Measure ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Rights ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Effective Mechanism ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Selection Of

В настоящей статье предпринята попытка исследовать отдельные проблемные аспекты института потерпевшего в российском уголовном процессе. В этих целях подвергнуты анализу правовые нормы, регламентирующие его процессуальный статус. Раскрываются отдельные пробелы уголовно-процессуального законодательства в сфере защиты законных прав и интересов потерпевшего. Автор акцентирует внимание на том, что совершенствование уголовно-процессуального законодательства в части расширения правомочий потерпевшего по отстаиванию своих нарушенных преступлением прав следует продолжить. На основании проведенного исследования действующего законодательства в части регламентации прав потерпевшего от преступления предлагается расширить перечень получаемых им копий постановлений, указанных в п. 13 ч. 2 ст. 42 УПК РФ. Автор предлагает включить в перечень указанной законодательной нормы право получения потерпевшим копии постановления об избрании конкретного вида меры пресечения, избранного в отношении подозреваемого (обвиняемого). Для создания действенного механизма защиты интересов потерпевших от преступления юридических лиц предлагаем ч. 9 ст. 42 УПК РФ изложить в следующей редакции: «в случае признания потерпевшим юридического лица его процессуальное право в уголовном процессе осуществляет представляющий его профессиональный адвокат». This article attempts to investigate certain problematic aspects of the institution of the victim in the Russian criminal process. For this purpose, analyzed the individual norms governing his procedural status. Separate gaps of the criminal procedure legislation in the sphere of protection of the legal rights and interests of the victim are disclosed. The author emphasizes that the improvement of the criminal procedure legislation in terms of the extension of the victim’s authority to defend his rights violated by the crime should be continued. On the basis of the study of the current legislation regarding the regulation of the rights of the victim of a crime, it is proposed to expand the list of decisions received by him, referred to in paragraph 13, part 2 of article 42 Code of Criminal Procedure. The author proposes to include in the list of the indicated legislative norm the right to receive the victim a copy of the decision on the selection of a specific type of preventive measure, selected in relation to the suspect (accused). To create an effective mechanism for protecting the interests of legal entities victims of a crime, we offer part 9 of art. 42 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation shall be reworded as follows: «if a legal entity is recognized as a victim, his procedural right in criminal proceedings is exercised by the professional lawyer representing him».

scholarly journals On the Implementation of the Captains of the Vessels of Powers of Bodies of Inquiry

2020 ◽  
pp. 80-82
Author(s):  
Andrey Mikhailovich Dolgov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Communication Links ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Current Stage

The paper deals with the implementation of such a principle of criminal procedure as the adversarial nature of the parties, in relation to the modern con-ditions of digitalization of legal proceedings. The relevance of this topic is explained by the fact that the current stage of development of public relations, characterized by the significant digitalization of communication links, in turn, is reflected in changes in legislation in General, and criminal proceedings in particular. At the same time, competition is one of the fundamental principles of this branch of law, the application of which should also be reflected in changes in legislation. In the course of the work, the criminal procedure norms regulating these issues, statistical data on the work of courts of General ju-risdiction, opinions and positions of leading proce-dural scientists in Russia and foreign countries (the Republic of Kazakhstan, Germany) were examined. As a result of the conducted research, the conclu-sion is made about the impact of the development of digitalization of criminal proceedings on the prac-tical application of the principle of adversarial par-ties.

scholarly journals Right of the detainee to have contact with a lawyer or solicitor and to direct consultation with them as an element of the Right of Defence

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 71-83
Author(s):  
Justyna Żylińska
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The Real ◽  
Legal Advice ◽  
Real Contact ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences

The subject of this study is an analysis of the detainee’s right to have contact with a lawyer or solicitor and to direct consultation with them as an element of the right of defence. The right of defence is also applicable with respect to detainees. An important element in the process of its fulfi lment is the real contact of the detainee with a lawyer or solicitor. In particular, it allows the detainee to obtain legal advice, not only with respect to the current procedural situation but also with respect to further legal consequences and ultimately effect the rights of defence to which the detainee is eligible in the manner consistent with his/her actual procedural interests. The author’s intention is to examine the scope and rules of application of the rights of the detainee as set out in Art. 245 of the Criminal Procedure Code and the analysis of its effect on the detainee’s effective exercising of the right of defence.

REVIEW ON THE MONOGRAPH OF OLEKSANDR TORBAS �DISCRETION IN THE CRIMINAL PROCESS OF UKRAINE: THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION AND PRACTICE OF IMPLEMENTATION�

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 147-150
Author(s):  
Iryna Hloviuk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Theoretical Justification ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Current Period ◽  
Legitimate Interests

Current period of development of the legal system of Ukraine is characterized by variability of legislation that regulates, in particular, organization of judicial system and implementation of criminal proceedings. Unfortunately, criminal procedure legislation is no exception, given how many changes and additions have been made to the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine since its entry into force in 2020. Undoubtedly, like any other codified legal act, CPC of Ukraine in modern conditions cannot be unchanged, given the dynamics of public relations, the provisions of international law, decisions of ECtHR and number of attempts to solve identified problems of its application. Difficulties of criminal procedural law enforcement are manifested in such an area as the use of discretion of authorities in criminal proceedings, although without it application of legislation is ineffective. At the same time, lawful discretion in criminal proceedings should not turn into its opposite � arbitrariness, which will already violate rights and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities. In criminal proceedings, given the imperative method of legal regulation and possibility of various coercive measures, including those related to the restriction of constitutional human rights, this issue is of particular importance, given, inter alia, that prosecution�s discretion applies within non-adversarial procedure, and the CPC of Ukraine does not always provide for the possibility of appealing such decisions in court. The peer-reviewed monograph consists of four chapters, which contain 10 sections. Structuring of the monograph is logical; the author analyse problems of discretion from questions of concept, signs and limits of discretion, and then moves to the characteristic of realization of discretion by judge, prosecutor, investigator, detective. In general, without a doubt, the monograph of Torbas O. O. �Discretion in the criminal process of Ukraine: theoretical justification and practice of implementation� is relevant, complete and fundamental scientific work, has scientific and practical value. Monograph of Torbas O.O. significantly enriches criminal procedure doctrine regarding the subjects of criminal proceedings, criminal procedure decisions and other areas.

scholarly journals Duty of Proving of a Civil Suit in Criminal Proceedings

2019 ◽  
pp. 137-144
Author(s):  
Serhii Krushynskyi
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Active Part ◽  
Unanimous Opinion ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Successful Performance ◽  
Property Damage ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Civil Suit ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of some problematic questions related to the duty of proving of civil suit in criminal proceedings in Ukraine. In the criminal procedure doctrine there is no unanimous opinion of which subjects are required to engage into proving activities aimed at detection of civil suit circumstances in criminal proceedings. Concepts «duty of proving» and «burden of proving» are delineated by author. The position that the burden of proving is determined by the interests of participants in criminal proceedings was supported. The content of the burden of proving of civil suit in criminal proceedings covers the need to representation of evidence to justify (or refute) the amount of property damage, the depth of the suffering, and the amount of property compensation for non-pecuniary damage. The material and procedural interest of the civil plaintiff and the civil defendant in the outcome of the criminal proceedings encourages them to take an active part in the criminal procedural proving, in particular by representation of evidence available to them. The publicity (officiality) of criminal proceedings causes differences in the procedure for proving the grounds and size of a civil suit in criminal proceedings compared to civil proceedings. It is concluded that the duty of proving of civil suit circumstances lies on the prosecution party (investigator, prosecutor). The civil plaintiff, the civil defendant, their representatives are complete subjects of proving, but their activity in proving is a right, but not a duty. For the successful performance of their procedural functions, the defense of their legitimate interests, these persons are empowered to represent evidence, to participate in their research. So, they are given the opportunity to contribute to the correct resolution of criminal proceedings, in particular in the civil suit part. The subjects involved in the criminal proceedings who have a duty of proving should provide a possibility of realization of the right to represent evidence by other participants in the process.

scholarly journals HARMONIZATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AS A MEANS OF ENSURING THEIR UNIFORM APPLICATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-514
Author(s):  
D.V. Tat'yanin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Red Tape ◽  
Judicial Proceedings ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Different Content

The law of criminal procedure contains a number of rules with different content, which raises a number of questions in their interpretation and application. Decisions made using rules with different content lead to their appeal, often to annulment, which does not ensure the achievement of the appointment of criminal proceedings, but leads to unjustified red tape in criminal proceedings and the delay in making final decisions on them. The need to harmonize criminal procedure rules is related to ensuring high-quality and effective criminal proceedings, ensuring the protection of the rights of participants in criminal proceedings, the quality of the evidence process, both in pre-trial and judicial proceedings. The article addresses the problems of unification of criminal procedure rules containing such concepts as an investigator and urgent investigative actions. It is proposed to eliminate the contradictions in them in order to ensure their uniform application. The introduction of a single concept of investigator and refusal to use the profession of "forensic investigator" in this concept is justified, it is proposed to expand the number of participants who have the right to carry out urgent investigative actions, as well as to assign to them investigative actions carried out at the stage of initiating a criminal case.

scholarly journals To the question of the implementation of the right to protection of minors, victims of crime

2020 ◽  
Vol - (1) ◽  
pp. 41-44
Author(s):  
A.I. Glushkov ◽  
◽  
E.E. Smekina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Victims Of Crime ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the analysis of issues of legal regulation and the realization in modern conditions of the rights to protection of adolescents who have suffered as a result of the crimes committed against them. Legal literature, legislative acts, as well as judicial and investigative practice on this issue have been analysed. On the basis of the study, problems of ensuring the right to protection of juvenile victims in criminal proceedings were identified, as well as proposals for improving the norms of criminal procedure legislation regulating this sphere of activity and their application were justified.

scholarly journals Institute of consent with accusation in criminal proceedings of Russia and foreign countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (S3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey F. Shumilin ◽  
Petr A. Kolmakov ◽  
Aleksander A. Nasonov ◽  
Ekaterina A. Novikova ◽  
Oksana S. Shumilina
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Legal Study ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Alternative Measures ◽  
Legal Consequences

The current study attempts to present the effects of a comparative legal study regarding the legal consequences of consent with accusation in Russia and foreign countries' criminal processes. It has been established that the institution of consent with accusation in the Russian criminal process does not have a significant effect on its reduction, and also does not determine the development and application of alternative measures of punishment for committing crimes. According to the current Criminal Procedure Code of Russia, consent with accusation concerning committing crimes of small and medium gravity entails the same consequences: release from criminal liability and reduction of the amount of punishment. Following the principle of fairness, the authors substantiated the most appropriate alternative penalties provided by the criminal procedure legislation of Germany and France.

scholarly journals Protection of Human Rights in the Criminal Procedure Legislation of the Republic Of Uzbekistan and Improved Reforms Taking Into Account Foreign Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 1102-1115
Author(s):  
Botirjon Khayitbayevich Ruzmetov
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Theory Of Evidence ◽  
The Right

In this article author had searched the questions devoted the protection of human rights in the criminal procedure legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan and comparing with the legislation and worldwide experience of the foreign states.The article reveals the ongoing liberalization of the criminal law policy in the Republic of Uzbekistan, which is aimed at expanding human and fair norms, strengthening the protection of the rights, legitimate interests of a person andsociety. Against this background, the significance of investigative actions and the theory of evidence in the country's criminal procedural legislation is being revised. The development of science and technology leads to the improvement of methods of committing crimes using computer technology, taking into account which the timely disclosure and effective investigation of socially dangerous acts requires extensive use of mathematical tools and computer technologies.In this regard, changes are taking place in the investigative practice aimed at increasing knowledge in the field of computer technologies among law enforcement officials and increasing the responsibility of the personal of the investigative and judicial authorities in the implementation of their activities.The author emphasizes that despite significant restrictions on the rights and legitimate interests of a person in the conduct of investigative actions, all of them are necessary for obtaining sufficient evidence to expose the guilt of the offender, in the manner prescribed by law.Compliance by investigators, prosecutors and judges of all criminal procedural requirements established by the legislation of the country is a key requirement for the recognition of evidence as lawful and sufficient for a fair sentence.It should be noted that the article highlights that, since 1994, the Criminal Procedure Code of Uzbekistan enshrines the right to defense by involving a lawyer in the case from the moment a person is detained on suspicion of committing a crime, as well as the principle of equality of arms in criminal proceedings. An addition to the liberalization of legislation is the fact that now the courts are freed from such unusual functions as the execution of court decisions.In addition, the article expands on the author's proposals for improving the legislation of Uzbekistan, as well as expanding the power of lawyers, especially in the conduct of investigative actions, aimed at expanding the process of liberalization of criminal law in the country and improving the situation with the protection of human rights in the investigation of criminal cases.

scholarly journals Forms of Interaction between an Investigator and Bodies of Inquiry at the Initial Stage of Pre-Trial Proceedings

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 70-79
Author(s):  
Yu. G. Torbin ◽  
A. A. Usachev ◽  
L. P. Plesneva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Initial Stage ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Right ◽  
To Receive

Despite the prolonged use of certain forms of interaction between the investigator and investigative agencies at the initial stage of pre-trial proceedings, the criminal procedure legislation still lacks some aspects of their implementation. This makes it necessary to study the current situation and substantiate the theoretical and practical provisions concerning interaction between an investigator and investigative agencies in the context of verification of the report of the crime in the light of the planned digitalization of domestic criminal proceedings. The author suggests that the forms of interaction, the application of which is expedient at the initial stage of pre-trial proceedings, include two procedural forms (giving written instructions to an investigative agency about carrying out operational search activities, obtaining explanations, obtaining assistance in carrying out investigative and other procedural actions) and two organizational forms (joint planning and formation of an investigative and task force). In order to increase the efficiency of criminal procedure at the initial stage of pre-trial proceedings, to ensure clarity of the language of criminal procedure law and its compliance with law enforcement, the auther proposes to amend Part 1 of Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by supplementing it with the right of authorized officials and bodies to give to investigative agencies mandatory written instructions for obtaining explanations, and to receive assistance from the investigative agency in carrying out verification actions. At the same time, the paper demonstrates the author’s approch to excluding obtaining explanations from the general list of procedural actions specified in Part 1 of Article 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and conducted by authorized subjects of verification of the report of the crime. Also, the paper analyzes the importance of introduction of electronic document circulation into criminal proceedings from the point of view of efficiency of interaction between the investigator and investigative authorities at the initial stage of pre-trial investigation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document