scholarly journals Exercise by the prosecutor of the functions of criminal prosecution and supervision of procedural activities of bodies of inquiry and bodies of preliminary investigation in the light of constitutional amendment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.S. Semidotskaya
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 42-48
Author(s):  
Aleksey B. Shapoval ◽  

The article is devoted to the analysis of a complex of problems associated with cases of psychological violence against suspects, accused for the purpose of obtaining confessions from them. The paper highlights the connection of this problem with the problems meet almost every application of bodies of inquiry, investigation courts, excessive stiffness of selected preventive measures, lack of rule of law by the prosecution during the preliminary investigation and participation in the restoration of violated rights of the defendants and low-level work of lawyers for the protection of violated rights of their clients. The author comes to the conclusion that the greatest problem in the field of protection of the rights and freedoms of both the suspect and the accused is the complexity of countering criminal prosecution, the procedural purpose of which is to obtain an accusatory result.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 61-64
Author(s):  
Ilya S. Dikarev ◽  

The author in the article deals with the powers to change the degree and qualification of the prosecution used by the Prosecutor at the final stage of pre-trial proceedings. The author concludes that the scope of powers depends on the form of preliminary investigation determining the procedural function of the Prosecutor. The opinion that the Prosecutor after transferring the criminal case with the indictment obtains the function of criminal prosecution is critically evaluated. The author shows that the Prosecutor assumes this function only if the indictment is approved. The author’s position is supported by the need to return the opportunity to adjust the charge in the criminal case received by him with the indictment to the Prosecutor.


Author(s):  
Yury Garmaev ◽  
Kim Dmitry

The authors analyze the history of the emergence and development of the corresponding criminological research and special criminalistic theory of overcoming the counteraction to criminal prosecution (preliminary investigation) to research its present condition, examine its potential for improving the effectiveness of fighting crime while strictly observing the rights and lawful interests of citizens. The authors use systemic, interdisciplinary and situational approaches, the methods of comparative jurisprudence and a number of sociology methods to update the current (to speak conventionally, accusatory) paradigm of the theory. The essence of this update (the new concept) is to ensure the adversarial nature of the judicial process, as well as in other types of court procedures, for the prosecution and the defense. The presented theory concept includes the idea that counteraction to prosecution could be not only unlawful and amoral, but also lawful and ethically admissible. The motives of persons involved in this counteraction could include their subjective confidence in their total or partial innocence, as well as the unlawful and (or) amoral, in that persons opinion, actions of some law enforcement employees. These clauses are developed through the authors own definition of counteraction and the classification of its acts. They have formulated six theses that form the basis of the updated paradigm of the theory. The authors conclude that the presented research approach, the concept reflected in the didactics of university law schools, could instill in students and practitioners a deep and stable personal motivation to study not only the corresponding academic disciplines, but the whole criminalistics and criminology as well as other theories and disciplines of the anti-criminal cycle. The suggested approach and the practical recommendations based on it could be used in the conceptually new syllabus (and subjects) already taught in the leading Russian universities, like «Counteracting Crime», «Criminalistic Support of Business Security», «Tactics of Protection against Unlawful Actions of Government Employees», «Tactics of Interaction between Business Structures and Controlling Bodies».


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 40-43
Author(s):  
Tatyana I. Khvenko ◽  

This article discusses the problems of a lawyer’s entry into a criminal case during the preliminary investigation, emphasizes the need for the officials of the preliminary investigation bodies to ensure the timely entry of a lawyer into a criminal case, substantiates the important role of a lawyer’s participation in the legality and legality of investigative and other procedural actions committed against the client, investigates the question of the need for the participation of a lawyer from the moment of the actual detention of a person subjected to criminal prosecution.


Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 12-20
Author(s):  
Nina Manova

Introduction: one of the most influential actors in the system of law enforcement agencies of any state, in any system of criminal proceedings, is the prosecutor; in this connection, the purpose of the work was to study his role in coordinating the activities of the bodies of inquiry and preliminary investigation in the implementation of criminal prosecution. Methods: the methodological framework for the work consists of the general scientific (dialectical, systemic, structural-functional, logical, etc.) and the specific scientific (formal-legal, comparative-legal, etc.) research methods. Results: the author’s position presented in the paper is based on the analysis of the legislative regulation, the knowledge accumulated in the theory of the criminal procedure and practical experience of the coordination and personal implementation of the criminal prosecution activities by the prosecutor in the pretrial stages of the criminal process. Conclusions: as a result of the study, the role of the prosecutor as the organizer and head of the criminal prosecution carried out by the inquirer and the investigator is justified; the mistakes made in reforming the procedural position of the prosecutor in pre-trial proceedings are revealed; the essential components in the real model of the prosecutor’s activity that were not taken into account by the legislator are identified: the nature of the prosecutor’s relationships with other participants in the process and his key role in the implementation of criminal prosecution (his responsibility for the legality of the pre-trial criminal prosecution, and the duty to maintain the public prosecution in court).


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Artemov ◽  
N. Golovanova ◽  
A. Gravina ◽  
O. Zaycev ◽  
V. Kashepov ◽  
...  

The scientific and practical guide is devoted to the formation of a comprehensive and systematic approach to improving the activities of the court and preliminary investigation bodies in cases of crimes committed in the field of business and other economic activities (including taking into account the experience of law enforcement practice in criminal prosecution of entrepreneurs in a number of foreign countries). The problem of establishing a balance between the duties of judicial and investigative bodies within their competence to take measures to ensure economic security and to respect the rights and legitimate interests of entrepreneurs involved in criminal proceedings is considered. The author defines the main directions and forms of modern criminal policy in this area; gives a General description of the criminal legal situation in terms of ensuring economic security; identifies additional guarantees of the rights and legitimate interests of entrepreneurs provided in the implementation of law enforcement activities. Particular importance is attached to the study of substantive and criminal procedural mechanisms used in criminal proceedings on economic crimes. For researchers, practicing lawyers, representatives of the business community, teachers, postgraduates, students of law schools and faculties, as well as for a wide range of readers interested in this issue.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3B) ◽  
pp. 645-651
Author(s):  
Artem Igorevich Neryakhin ◽  
Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Ivanov ◽  
Vasily Dzhonovich Potapov ◽  
Denis N. Stacyuk ◽  
Tatiana Ivanovna Bondar

The authors study the controversial issues of termination of a criminal case (criminal prosecution) on the condition of voluntary compensation for the damage caused by the crime by the suspect (accused) during the preliminary investigation. The thesis is proved that in Russian criminal proceedings the procedure for voluntary compensation for damage caused by a crime is quite clearly regulated, and if the suspect (accused) voluntarily compensated for the property damage caused, then their actions will be evaluated within the current legal framework, when the fact of compensation for damage creates grounds for exemption from criminal liability and termination of the criminal case (criminal prosecution) in accordance with Articles 75, 76, 761, 762 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Articles 25, 251, 28, 281 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-74
Author(s):  
Елена Папышева

This article discusses some powers of a prosecutor, his legal status in criminal procedure and administrative proceedings, the relationship between the functions of criminal prosecution and prosecutorial supervision. The author notes that at the stage of initiating a criminal case, prosecutor’s powers for criminal prosecution are exercised through supervisory activities, during which, on the facts of perpetration, he is entitled to make a reasoned decision to send the relevant materials to preliminary investigation bodies. The article analyzes prosecutor’s powers in initiating an administrative case, the legal nature of the prosecutor’s decision, which, according to the author, is not and cannot be evidence in the case (source of evidence), in contrast to the position of the courts and the prevailing judicial practice. Both processes (criminal and administrative proceedings) are based on identical principles and have similar institutions. Including for this reason, the problems of determining the status and powers of the prosecutor in exercising supervision have common roots.


Legal Concept ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
Yuri Franciforov ◽  
Natalia Solovyova ◽  
Vladimir Shinkaruk

Introduction: the paper reveals the peculiarities of the interaction of the court with the officials for the prosecution, who have authority at the stages of initiating a criminal case and preliminary investigation. The paper reveals the types of interaction, as well as the prerequisites for the interaction efficiency between the court and the parties to criminal proceedings on the part of the prosecution, which are based on such fundamental principles of the criminal process as legality, inviolability of the individual, respect for the honor and dignity of the individual and publicity. The interaction of parties to criminal proceedings on the part of the prosecution and the court is carried out through mutual relations conditioned by common tasks, which are based on the principle of publicity, caused by the interests of society and the state, in order to ensure the rights and legitimate interests of the individual, to some extent involved in the criminal proceedings. In this regard, the objectives of the study are: the recommendations for improving the interaction efficiency between individual participants of the prosecution and the court in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case, the enhancing of cooperation between the subjects of the investigation, the prosecutor and the court, aimed at protecting the rights of persons who have suffered from a crime, as well as the ensuring of the rights of an individual who has been subjected to unjustified criminal prosecution. Methods: the methodological framework for the scientific paper is the methods of scientific cognition, and such general scientific research methods as dialectical, logical, system, structural and functional, and the specific scientific methods, the comparative legal and formal legal methods. Results: in the paper, the authors determine that the interaction of the court, the prosecutor and the investigator contains the following components: purpose, stage and form; sets the criteria for the forms of interaction, in the form of procedural status, purpose, share of responsibility and the nature of legal relations. The paper examines such terms as “relationship” and “interaction”, due to the need to determine their relationship. The authors establish that the relationship of interaction and relationships of parties to criminal proceedings can be characterized as part and general. The highest form of relationship between parties to criminal proceedings is procedural interaction, which forms their stable relationships, gives them the property of stability and productivity. Conclusions: the authors determine that the interaction of the preliminary investigation bodies, the prosecutor and the court is based on the tasks of collecting evidence in the course of criminal proceedings, due to: the need to obtain permission to conduct certain investigative actions and the measures of procedural coercion; the prosecutor’s supervision of the procedural activities of the bodies of inquiry and preliminary investigation; the powers of the court in pre-trial proceedings. The authors come to the conclusion that the main tasks of interaction are: ensuring the legality of the activities of the participants in the interaction; preparing an indictment, a charging document or a determination, for a full, comprehensive and objective judicial review; implementing the protection of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a person and citizen, the interests of society and the state.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-105
Author(s):  
E. S. Kaminskiy ◽  

The author comes to the conclusion that the construction of a criminal justice system based on expediency is necessary in modern conditions of humanization of legislation, economy of repression and optimization of criminal proceedings. Expediency as a condition for making procedural decisions should also be applied at the stage of checking the report of a crime when deciding whether to initiate criminal proceedings. It is necessary to grant such powers to the Prosecutor, returning to him, among other things, other powers to direct the preliminary investigation. A reasonable balance between public and private interests, as determined by the Prosecutor in each particular case, should be the basis for determining the criteria for the appropriateness of criminal prosecution. The Prosecutor's assessment activity in this situation should be based on his inner conviction and conscience and consist in determining the degree to which the interests of society and participants in the criminal law conflict correspond to possible criminal prosecution and its consequences, on the one hand, and the use of alternative measures to respond to the crime committed, on the other. To do this, the Prosecutor must be provided with flexible procedural tools. Refusal to initiate criminal proceedings and use alternative measures is necessary in cases where the burden of investigating the crime is not comparable with the result obtained, the person has ceased to be a public danger and has made amends for the damage caused. The grounds for refusing to initiate criminal proceedings and applying alternative measures may be reconciliation of participants in a criminal law conflict, active remorse, making amends for the harm caused by the crime, or changing the situation. Refusal to initiate criminal proceedings and the use of alternative measures should not significantly affect the legal interests of participants in the criminal conflict.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document