scholarly journals MEMBONGKAR ISI PESAN DAN MEDIA DENGAN CONTENT ANALYSIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (33) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Gusti Yasser Arafat

Content analysis in a quantitative research tradition is a method of communication science research and also for some of another social sciences branch. The quantitative content analysis is in the scope of positivistic paradigm that put its researcher as a neutral scientist who do not take a side and forbidden prohibited to product opinion. The researcher is only need to collect and then categorizing meaning of a content such as text, image, sign, and symbol. Content analysis is also able to test a hipotetic using deductive methode by series of statistic test. In communication sciences, this research methode model would powerful to answer how the media effect which impact to public and analyzing the people all at once. The difference between social construct in society and the recontructed reality by the media would being explained using this great methode. Content analysis is capable to measure the accuracy level of message producer and where it’s inclined.

Author(s):  
Gary Goertz ◽  
James Mahoney

Some in the social sciences argue that the same logic applies to both qualitative and quantitative research methods. This book demonstrates that these two paradigms constitute different cultures, each internally coherent yet marked by contrasting norms, practices, and toolkits. The book identifies and discusses major differences between these two traditions that touch nearly every aspect of social science research, including design, goals, causal effects and models, concepts and measurement, data analysis, and case selection. Although focused on the differences between qualitative and quantitative research, the book also seeks to promote toleration, exchange, and learning by enabling scholars to think beyond their own culture and see an alternative scientific worldview. The book is written in an easily accessible style and features a host of real-world examples to illustrate methodological points.


Author(s):  
Zixiu Liu

This pilot study uses quantitative content analysis following the framework of generic frames, diagnostic and prognostic frames (Godefroidt et al. 2016) to compare the news framing of the Ukraine crisis in Russia and the UK from 30 November 2013 to 26 February 2014. The Moscow Times and The Guardian were chosen as examples of quality print media with online editions that are comparable in terms of quality, circulation rate, political stance, and more importantly – global targeting. The study argues that firstly, the media in both countries were more likely to report through conflict lens, followed by responsibility frame. Secondly, the difference between the Eastern and Western media was tracked. While the Russian media relatively preferred economic consequence frame reflecting the country’s geopolitical interests, the British media tended to use human-interest frame highlighting unfairness and non-proportionality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Wettstein ◽  
Frank Esser ◽  
Anne Schulz ◽  
Dominique S. Wirz ◽  
Werner Wirth

In the wake of the recent successes of populist political actors and discussions about its causes in Europe, the contribution of the media has become an issue of public debate. We identify three roles—as gatekeepers, interpreters, and initiators—the media can assume in their coverage of populist actors, populist ideology, and populist communication. A comparative content analysis of nine thousand stories from fifty-nine news outlets in ten European countries shows that both media factors (e.g., tabloid orientation) and political factors (e.g., response of mainstream parties) influence the extent and nature of populism in the media. Although newspapers in most countries do not overrepresent populist actors and tend to evaluate them negatively, we still find abundant populist content in the news. Several media outlets like to present themselves as mouthpieces of the people while, at the same time, cover politicians and parties with antiinstitutional undertones.


1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-499 ◽  

Starting from the fact, well-established by now, that conventional social sciences, developed in a specific social/cultural/political/economic context, cannot be relied upon to explain, analyse and understand the social dynamics in different contexts - let alone to predict the outcome of this dynamics - this paper outlines the agenda for research in social sciences in Third World countries. It identifies the areas of research and goes on to emphasize the need for evolving an alternative theory of development which, instead of insisting on industrialization and modernization at all costs, takes into account the historical and social factors in each society and sets itself goals that are both desirable and viable, and comes to grips with the needs and aspirations of the people.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-480
Author(s):  
Xiaoqun Zhang

This study assessed the media visibility, a composite measure of attention and prominence, of China’s President Xi Jinping’s first 3-year governance in The New York Times. The assessment was based on the content analysis of 317 news articles focusing on Chinese President. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify three major frames, 12 mid-level frames, and 18 sub-frames. Quantitative content analysis was used to measure the attention, prominence, and the combination of these two parameters of these frames. The findings showed that The New York Times employed multiple frames to report Chinese President, and the two frames with the highest media visibility are (Domestic) Campaigns and Strategies and China-United States (relations), rather than Human Rights.


2002 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall S. Sumpter ◽  
Melissa A. Braddock

This quantitative content analysis examines source use for an eleven-week period in a “news disaster” story. The frequency of similar stories, which explain to readers, viewers, and listeners how the media do their work, has grown in the past forty years, and media observers are unsure what the change means. In this study, source affiliations and themes are evaluated in a census of stories about errors made by the media in reporting election night returns for the 2000 presidential race. News workers and other media-affiliated sources initially dominated the stories. They commonly explained how the reporting errors occurred or related factual information about the coverage. These sources and themes effectively blocked other affiliated and unaffiliated sources from evaluating the media's performance until later.


2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Dragojevic ◽  
Dana Mastro ◽  
Howard Giles ◽  
Alexander Sink

AbstractAccent is a potent cue to social categorization and stereotyping. An important agent of accent-based stereotype socialization is the media. The present study is the first quantitative content analysis to comprehensively examine accent portrayals on American primetime television. We focused our analysis on portrayals of Standard American (SA), Nonstandard American (NSA), Foreign-Anglo (FA), and Foreign-Other (FO) accents. Results provide clear evidence that American media's portrayals of different accents are biased, reflecting pervasive societal stereotypes. Whereas SA and FA speakers are over-represented on television, NSA and FO speakers are effectively silenced, by virtue of their sheer absence and gross under-representation. Moreover, when NSA and FO speakers do rarely appear on television, they tend to be portrayed less favorably on status-related traits and physical appearance than SA and FA speakers. These findings provide insight into the potential influence of media consumption on consumers’ social perceptions of different linguistic groups. (Accents, media, language attitudes, stereotypes, content analysis)*


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia D. Tregubova ◽  
Marharyta Fabrykant ◽  
Alla Marchenko

The objective of this paper is to outline and compare frameworks for studying post-Soviet transformations developed by social scientists from various disciplines in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. The objective is realized by means of quantitative content analysis of scholarly articles’ abstracts in ninety-four journals in eight (inter)disciplinary fields that covers the period of 2001-2015. This paper seeks to answer the question whether differences in the studies of the post-Soviet transformations are defined by country discourse or by the field of study. The research results suggest that there is a two-level mechanism, by which the societal context affects academia, in this case, social sciences and humanities. While general directions of scholarly attention are determined by societal differences, representations of post-Soviet transformations are framed through specific disciplinary lenses that combine both international and post-Soviet features.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 96-108
Author(s):  
N. L. Abramyan ◽  
M. V. Alekyan ◽  
M. R. Tadevosyan

In the context of the globalization of academic communication and exchange in the field of social sciences and humanities, the question of the accuracy of the terms used is crucial. In particular, the difference in understanding of concepts tends to get worse in the theory of journalism. There are many examples of this, but this article studies the specific problem of confusion in terms and definitions. Namely, are the concepts “information flows”, “journalism”, “mass media”, “QMS” equal in volume, or are they multi-volume and different in meaning? Based on the chosen research methods – the use of a combination of analysis, comparison, induction, generalization – we came to the conclusion that the media concepts presented above cannot be considered as equivalents, synonymous or interchangeable terms. The scope and content of the considered concepts do not coincide. It will be beneficial to classify them as “interdependent”, since only in such a ratio is it possible to effectively study them.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-65
Author(s):  
Achmad Bayu Chandrabuwono ◽  
Atika Rusli ◽  
Andika Sanjaya

The Regional Head Candidates use advertisements on TVRI South Kalimantan to influence the public and get votes during the 2018 Regional Election campaign. The research uses a descriptive quantitative research type. Descriptive method aims to describe systematically the facts or characteristics of certain populations factually and accurately. This type of research uses quantitative content analysis. The findings state that effective advertising must contain creative and attached messages. According to our research, we conclude that political advertising in South Kalimantan is less effective. Prospective Regional Heads cannot rely on this type of advertising as the main campaign tool. They have to improvise with other media.Keywords: Political Communication, Political Advertisiement, Television. ABSTRAKPara Calon Kepala Daerah menggunakan iklan untuk mempengaruhi masyarakat dan memperoleh suara selama kampanye.Penelitian menggunakan jenis penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif. Metode deskriptif bertujuan melukiskan secara sistematis fakta atau karak-teristik populasi tertentu secara faktual dan cermat. Tipe penelitian menggunakan analisis isi kuantitatif.Hasil temuan menyatakan iklan yang efektif harus mengandung pesan-pesan kreatif dan melekat. Menurut riset kami, kami menyimpulkan bahwa iklan politik di Kalimantan Selatan kurang efektif., Para Calon Kepala Daerah tidak dapat bergantung pada jenis iklan ini sebagai alat kampanye utama. Mereka harus berimprovisasi dengan media lain..Kata kunci: Komunikasi politik, iklan politik, televisi


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document