EMDR and Nonpharmacological Techniques for Anxiety Prevention in Children Prior to Invasive Medical Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-175
Author(s):  
Isabella Lucia Chiara Mariani Wigley ◽  
Valentina De Tommasi ◽  
Sabrina Bonichini ◽  
Isabel Fernandez ◽  
Franca Benini
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Medical Procedure ◽  
Medical Procedures ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Anxiety Prevention ◽  
Invasive Medical Procedures ◽  
Depression Scales

Nonpharmacological Techniques (NPT) have been suggested as an efficient and safe means to reduce pain and anxiety in invasive medical procedures. Due to the anxious and potentially traumatic nature of these procedures, we decided to integrate an eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) session in the preprocedure NPT. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of one session of EMDR in addition to the routine NPT. Forty-nine pediatric patients (Male = 25; Female = 24) aged 8–18 years (M = 13.17; SD = 2.98) undergoing painful and invasive medical procedures were randomized to receive standard preprocedural care (N = 25) or a session of EMDR in addition to the standard nonpharmacological interventions (N = 24). Participants completed the anxiety and depression scales from the Italian Psychiatric Self-evaluation Scale for Children and Adolescents (SAFA) and rated anxiety on a 0–10 numeric rating scale. Participants in the NPT+EMDR condition expressed significantly less anxiety before the medical procedure than those in the NPT group (p = .038). The integration of EMDR with NPT was demonstrated to be an effective anxiety prevention technique for pediatric sedo-analgesia. These results are the first data on the efficacy of EMDR as a technique to prevent anxiety in pediatric sedo-analgesia. There are important long-term clinical implications because this therapy allows an intervention on situations at risk of future morbidity and the prevention of severe disorders.

scholarly journals A prospective cohort register-based study of chronic postsurgical pain and long-term use of pain medication after otorhinolaryngological surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Graf ◽  
Katharina Geißler ◽  
Winfried Meißner ◽  
Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Postsurgical Pain ◽  
Average Pain Intensity ◽  
Chronic Postsurgical Pain ◽  
Average Pain ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Perioperative Assessment ◽  
Numeric Rating

AbstractData on chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after otorhinolaryngological surgery are sparse. Adult in-patients treated in 2017 were included into the prospective PAIN OUT registry. Patients’ pain on the first postoperative day (D1), after six months (M6) and 12 months (M12) were evaluated. Determining factor for CPSP was an average pain intensity ≥ 3 (numeric rating scale 0–10) at M6. Risk factors associated with CPSP were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. 10% of 191 included patients (60% male, median age: 52 years; maximal pain at D1: 3.5 ± 2.7), had CPSP. Average pain at M6 was 0.1 ± 0.5 for patients without CPSP and 4.2 ± 1.2 with CPSP. Average pain with CPSP still was 3.7 ± 1.1 at M12. Higher ASA status (Odds ratio [OR] = 4.052; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.453–11.189; p = 0.007), and higher minimal pain at D1 (OR = 1.721; CI = 1.189–2.492; p = 0.004) were independent predictors of CPSP at M6. Minimal pain at D1 (OR = 1.443; CI = 1.008–2.064; p = 0.045) and maximal pain at M6 (OR = 1.665; CI = 1.340–2.069; p < 0.001) were independent predictors for CPSP at M12. CPSP is an important issue after otorhinolaryngological surgery. Better instrument for perioperative assessment should be defined to identify patients at risk for CPSP.

Decreasing the leakage of continuous femoral nerve catheter fixation using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue (Demabond®): A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theerawat Chalacheewa ◽  
Vanlapa Arnuntasupakul ◽  
Lisa Sangkum ◽  
Rungrawan Buachai ◽  
Jiravud Chanvitayapongs
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Nerve ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Catheter Removal ◽  
Cyanoacrylate Glue ◽  
Catheter Dislodgement ◽  
Peripheral Nerve Catheter

Abstract Background: Continuous peripheral nerve catheters (CPNCs) have been used for postoperative pain relief. A common problem encountered with CPNCs is pericatheter leakage, which can lead to dressing adhesive failure. Frequent dressing changes increase the risk of catheter dislodgement and infections. Adhesive glue is effective in securing the peripheral nerve catheter and decreasing leakage around the catheter insertion site. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of pericatheter leakage with fixation using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue (Dermabond®) as compared to sterile strips.Methods: Thirty patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with continuous femoral nerve catheter for postoperative analgesia were randomized into the catheter fixation with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue (Dermabond®) group or the sterile strip group. The primary outcome was the incidence of pericatheter leakage. Secondary outcomes included the frequent of catheter displacement, the difficulty of catheter removal, pain score and patient satisfaction.Results: The incidence of pericatheter leakage at 24 and 48 hours was 0% versus 93% and 0% versus 100% in the Dermabond® and sterile strip groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The incidence of displacement at 24 and 48 hours was 6.7% versus 93.3% and 6.7% versus 100% in the Dermabond® and sterile strip, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference in numeric rating scale, difficulty of catheter removal, or satisfaction scores between groups.Conclusion: Catheter fixation with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue (Dermabond®) decreased the incidence of pericatheter leakage, as well as catheter displacement, over 48 hours as compared to sterile strip fixation.

Electroanalgesia during a carboxytherapy procedure for cellulite: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 283-290
Author(s):  
Adria Yared Sadala ◽  
Érika Patrícia Rampazo da Silva ◽  
Richard Eloin Liebano
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Electrical Currents ◽  
Electrical Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Interferential Current ◽  
Clinical Trials Registry

The aim of the present study is to describe a study protocol to compare different types of analgesic electrical currents on pain intensity and sensory comfort during the application of carboxytherapy for the treatment of cellulite. Seventy five women with the presence of moderate and/or severe gluteal cellulite will be randomly allocated into three groups: carboxytherapy plus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, carboxytherapy plus interferential current or carboxytherapy plus Aussie current. Pain intensity, which is the primary outcome, will be measured by a numeric rating scale (0–10). The secondary outcome is sensory comfort, which will be measured using the visual analogue scale (0–10). Trial registration: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry: ReBEC (RBR-6z82zb) www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-6z82zb/

Effect of Pregabalin on Radiotherapy-Related Neuropathic Pain in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingru Jiang ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
Qingyu Shen ◽  
Xiaoming Rong ◽  
Xiaolong Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Mood States ◽  
Numeric Rating

Purpose Neuropathic pain is an unavoidable treatment-related adverse event among patients with head and neck cancer who are undergoing radiotherapy. We aimed to test the efficacy and safety of pregabalin versus placebo in the treatment of radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain. Patients and Methods This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in four centers in China. Eligible patients with a mean pain intensity score of 4 or more on an 11-point numeric rating scale were randomly assigned to receive either active treatment with a flexible dose of pregabalin or placebo for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was pain reduction measured on the numeric rating scale. Result There were 128 patients who received treatment as randomly assigned. Pain intensity reduction was 2.44 in the pregabalin arm and 1.58 in the placebo arm at week 16, yielding an adjusted mean difference of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.30 to 1.44; P = .003). In the pregabalin arm, 38 patients (59.4%) achieved at least 30% pain relief versus 21 (32.8%) in the placebo arm ( P = .006). Nineteen patients (29.7%) in the pregabalin group and five (7.8%) in the placebo group achieved 50% or greater pain relief ( P = .003). Total scores on the Profile of Mood States-Short Form, pain severity and functional interference of Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, as well as the physiology and psychology domain of the WHO Quality of Life-BREF all were reduced significantly at week 16 in patients who received pregabalin compared with those who received placebo. There was no significant difference ( P = .29) in the incidence of experiencing at least one adverse event in the pregabalin arm (n = 35; 54.7%) versus the placebo arm (n = 29; 45.3%). Conclusion Patients treated with pregabalin with radiotherapy-related neuropathic pain had greater pain alleviation, better mood states, and higher quality of life compared with patients in the placebo group, with a good tolerability.

Effectiveness of Simulated Horseback Riding for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
TaeYeong Kim ◽  
JaeHyuk Lee ◽  
SeJun Oh ◽  
Seungmin Kim ◽  
BumChul Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Oswestry Disability Index ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Baseline Values ◽  
Numeric Rating

Context: A simulated horseback riding (SHR) exercise is effective for improvement of pain and functional disability, but its comparative effectiveness with the other is unknown. Objective: The authors aimed to demonstrate the effect of a SHR exercise in people with chronic low back pain. Design: A randomized controlled trial. Settings: Community and university campus. Participants: A total of 48 participants with chronic low back pain were divided into 2 groups, and SHR exercises (n = 24) or stabilization (STB) exercises (n = 24) were performed. Interventions: The exercises were performed for 30 minutes, 2 days per week for 8 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Numeric rating scale, functional disabilities (Oswestry disability index and Roland–Morris disability), and fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) scores were measured at baseline and at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months. Results: A 2-way repeated analysis of variance identified that between-group comparisons showed significant differences in the FABQ related to work scale (F = 21.422; P = .01). There were no significant differences in the numeric rating scale (F = 1.696; P = .21), Oswestry disability index (F = 1.848; P = .20), Roland–Morris disability (F = 0.069; P = .80), and FABQ related to physical scale (F = 1.579; P = .24). In within-group comparisons, both groups presented significant differences in numeric rating scale (both SHR and STB after 4 wk), Oswestry disability index (both SHR and STB after 6 mo), and Roland–Morris disability (SHR after 6 mo and STB after 8 wk) compared with baseline values. In FABQ-related physical (SHR after 4 wk) and work scales (SHR after 6 mo), there were only significant differences in the SHR compared with baseline values. Conclusions: SHR exercise for 8 weeks had a greater effect than STB exercise for reducing work-related FABQ. The SHR exercise performed in a seated position could substantially decrease pain-related fear disability in young adults with chronic low back pain.

scholarly journals Examining the effects of enhanced provider–patient communication on postoperative tonsillectomy pain: protocol of a randomised controlled trial performed by nurses in daily clinical care

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. e015505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liesbeth M van Vliet ◽  
Sandra van Dulmen ◽  
Bram Thiel ◽  
Gerard W van Deelen ◽  
Stephanie Immerzeel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Audio Recordings ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Care Ward

IntroductionPlacebo effects (true biopsychological effects not attributable to the active ingredients of medical technical interventions) can be attributed to several mechanisms, such as expectancy manipulation and empathy manipulation elicited by a provider’s communication. So far, effects have primarily been shown in laboratory settings. The aim of this study is to determine the separate and combined effects of expectancy manipulation and empathy manipulation during preoperative and postoperative tonsillectomy analgesia care on clinical adult patients’ outcomes.Methods and analysisUsing a two-by-two randomised controlled trial, 128 adult tonsillectomy patients will be randomly assigned to one out of four conditions differing in the level of expectancy manipulation (standard vs enhanced) and empathy manipulation (standard vs enhanced). Day care ward nurses are trained to deliver the intervention, while patients are treated via the standard analgesia protocol and hospital routines. The primary outcome, perceived pain, is measured via hospital routine by a Numeric Rating Scale, and additional prehospitalisation, perihospitalisation and posthospitalisation questionnaires are completed (until day 3, ie, 2 days after the operation). The manipulation is checked using audio recordings of nurse–patient interactions.Ethics and disseminationAlthough communication is manipulated, the manipulations do not cross norms or values of acceptable behaviour. Standard medical care is provided. The ethical committee of the UMC Utrecht and the local OLVG hospital committee approved the study. Results will be published via (inter)national peer-reviewed journals and a lay publication.Trial registration numberNTR5994; Pre-results.

Pre-emptive ice cube cryotherapy for reducing pain from local anaesthetic injections for simple lacerations: a randomised controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
JaeWoo Song ◽  
HyukHoon Kim ◽  
EunJung Park ◽  
Jung Hwan Ahn ◽  
Eunhui Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injection Site ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ice Cube ◽  
Perceived Pain ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Numeric Rating

ObjectiveSubcutaneous local anaesthetic injection can be painful to patients in the ED. We evaluated the effect of cryotherapy by application of an ice cube to the injection site prior to injection in patients with simple lacerations.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, randomised, controlled trial in consented patients with simple lacerations needing primary repair at a single emergency centre from April to July 2016. We randomly assigned patients undergoing repair for simple lacerations to either the cryotherapy group or the control group (standard care; no cryotherapy or other pretreatment of the injection site). In cryotherapy group subjects, we applied an ice cube (size: 1.5×1.5×1.5 cm) placed inside a sterile glove on the wound at the anticipated subcutaneous lidocaine injection site for 2 min prior to injection. The primary outcome was a subjective numeric rating (0–10 scale) of the perceived pain from the subcutaneous local anaesthetic injections. Secondary outcomes were (a) perceived pain on a numeric scale for cryotherapy itself, that is, pain from contact of the ice cube/glove with the skin and (b) the rate of complications after primary laceration repair.ResultsFifty patients were enrolled, consented and randomised, with 25 in the cryotherapy group and 25 in the control group. The numeric rating scale for subcutaneous anaesthetic injections was median, IQR, 95% CI 2.0 (1 to 3.5), 1.81 to 3.47, respectively, in the cryotherapy group and 5.0 (3 to 7), 3.91 to 6.05 in the control group (Mann-Whitney U=147.50, p=0.001). No wound complications occurred in either group. The numeric rating scale for cryotherapy itself was median, IQR, 95% CI: 2.0 (1 to 3.5), 1.90 to 3.70.ConclusionPre-emptive topical injection site cryotherapy lasting 2 min before subcutaneous local anaesthetic injections can significantly reduce perceived pain from subcutaneous local anaesthetic injections in patients presenting for simple laceration repair.Trial registration numberKCT0001990.

scholarly journals Medial closure supracondylar femoral osteotomy: an effective solution for long-term treatment of arthritic valgus knee?

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Mattia Uboldi ◽  
Martino Travi ◽  
Daniele Tradati ◽  
Alessio Maione ◽  
Andrea Fabio Manunta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Society Score ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
International Knee Documentation Committee ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Valgus Knee ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Purpose The aim of this work was to retrospectively analyze the clinical, subjective, and radiological results of medial closing-wedge distal femur osteotomy (MCW-DFO) for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in valgus knee at medium- to long-term follow-up. Materials and methods A total of 57 patients (62 knees) treated with MCW-DFO between 1984 and 2018 were included in the study. Patient age at the time of the surgery ranged between 28 and 61 years (average: 48 years). All patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years were contacted to request for them to undergo clinical, subjective, and radiological evaluation. Preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle (i.e., preoperative valgus malalignment) was 8.6° ± 2°. Patients were evaluated using the following scales: the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Knee Society Score (KSS), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Numeric Rating Scale 11 (NRS-11). Results Mean follow-up was 11.6 ± 4.9 years, and a total of 17 patients (20 knees) were available for the last examination. At maximum follow-up, 4 patients underwent conversion to a total knee replacement (20%); their survival rate was 100% at 10 years and 66.7% at 15 years, as estimated using the Kaplan–Meier curve. The subjective Knee Society Score improved on average from 37.7 ± 10 to 63.9 ± 15.4. The objective Knee Society Score improved on average from 42.2 ± 11.7 to 75 ± 22.5. The pain detected through the VAS and NRS-11 scales improved from 56.7 ± 12.9 to 42 ± 17.1 and from 5.8 ± 1.1 to 4.4 ± 1.7, respectively. Thirteen patients (70%) required hardware removal at an average time of 19 ± 4 months due to a local nuisance. Conclusions MCW-DFO can improve symptoms in patients with osteoarthritis in a valgus knee at medium- to long-term follow-up, reducing the progression of osteoarthritis in properly selected patients.

scholarly journals A randomized controlled trial to compare effects of different volume and concentration of lidocaine for preventing propofol injection pain in adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 564
Author(s):  
Ashish Patyal ◽  
Anjana Verma ◽  
Madhavi Buddhi
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Injection Pain ◽  
Response Scale ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Experienced Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Pain on propofol injection is an unwanted effect which can lead to decreased patient satisfaction. Although many studies have shown that pre-treatment with lidocaine injection is effective in this pain, nevertheless, very few studies have been done  on different concentration and volume of lidocaine, effective of reducing pain significantly. Objective of the current study was to assess and compare the efficacy of intravenous lidocaine with  0.4% and 2% concentration in reducing the incidence and severity of propofol injection pain.Methods: A total of 126 American Society of Anesthesiologist grade I and II patients with age ≥18 years, scheduled for an elective surgery, were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized into two equal groups of 63 each. Group A (n = 63) received pretreatment with 0.4% lidocaine and group B (n = 63) received 2% lidocaine. Propofol injection pain was measured by using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Withdrawl Response Scale (WRS). Unpaired t test, ANOVA and Chi square test were used for statistical analysis.Results: A statistically significant decrease in the pain was recorded in group A (0.4% lidocaine) as compared to group B (2% lidocaine). Using NRS scale, 12% of patients in group A as compared to 33% patients of group B, experienced pain (p =0.02); while using WRS, 8% patients of group A as compared to 27% group B patients experienced pain (p= 0.04).Conclusions: The pain on injection of propofol is significantly decreased by the use of 0.4% lidocaine in comparison with 2% Lidocaine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document