scholarly journals The books with ex-libris in the rare book fund in the research library of Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after I. N. Ulyanov

Bibliosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 61-69
Author(s):  
K. V. Polyakova ◽  
M. V. Kurylyova
Keyword(s):  
National Culture ◽  
Russian Literature ◽  
Information Resource ◽  
Research Library ◽  
Rare Book ◽  
Historical Figures ◽  
State Pedagogical ◽  
History Of ◽  
Xix Century ◽  
Private Collections

An ex-libris (a bookplate) is a valuable historical and cultural information resource. It helps to determine the ownership of a book in a particular collection, allows the understanding the history of existence of a copy that had several owners, and clarification the degree of its uniqueness. The purpose of the article is to analyze the bookplates available on the book rarities of the first quarter of the XIX century from the collection of the research library of Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after I. N. Ulyanov. By means of the identification of book signs, the belonging of rare publications to private collections and the peculiarities of existence of each particular copy in the history of national culture are established. In particular, one of the books belonging to the lost Usolskaya library of count V. P. Orlov-Davydov, dispersed among the libraries of the country and reconstructed by specialists, was identified. Two other books were the part of private libraries of historical figures who were in fairly close relations with prominent figures of Russian literature (the poet M. Yu. Lermontov) and science (the inventor of radio A. S. Popov). The results of the research can expand the understanding of the uniqueness of rare copies of Russian and foreign publications from the Fund of the research library of the Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University, such as” Selected spiritual works of Fenelon, Archbishop of Cambrai” (1820–1821), “Nouveau dictionnaire géographique universel” (New dictionary of geographical names) by Jacques McCarthy (1824) and «Histoire de France» (History of France) by Louis-Philippe Segur.

scholarly journals "We should live the people's lives ..." K.P. Pobedonostsev About the main characteristics of Russian literature

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
A.V. Shmeleva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Literature ◽  
Artistic Expression ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
The People ◽  
History Of ◽  
Xix Century

This publication reveals the tradition of Russian literature, based on the principles of historicism and nationalities. The connection of speech and outlook of the writer as an example of creativity one of the outstanding figures of the second half of the XIX century – K.P Pobedonostsev. Research subject is the basic thesis of Pobedonostsev which is addressed to the writers - "We should live the people's lives ...." Accumulation of the ideals of the people, which are elaborated throughout the history of Russia. It allows to preserve the culture of artistic expression and national historic appearance.

Essays on the history of Russian journalism in the first third of the XIX century

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Literature ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
History Of ◽  
Multi Level ◽  
Xix Century ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Conceptual Foundations ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Printed Sources

In collective scientific work the causes and dynamics of complex and contradictory processes of formation of Russian journalism in the first third of the XIX century are analyzed and the relationship of Russian journalism and literature of this period is studied on the basis of the analysis of publicistic texts of writers in periodicals and rare printed sources. The team of authors also sought to theoretically comprehend and practically study journalism as a special field of literature, to develop new conceptual foundations for analyzing the complex and multi-level interaction of journalism and other types and genres of Russian literature.

scholarly journals Afanasy Fet’s essays “From the Village” and Pavel Medvedev’s article “Dreams and Reality”: to the history of polemics

Litera ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 8-17
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Viktorovna Tselikova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Literature ◽  
Art And Science ◽  
Science And Art ◽  
History Of ◽  
Democratic School ◽  
The Right ◽  
Xix Century ◽  
The Village

This article meticulously analyzes the views of the representative of aesthetic school and school of democratic poetry of the Russian literature of the XIX century upon the designation of art and science. The essays “From the Village” by A. A. Fet, which depict the poet’s outlook upon the role and tasks of poetry, science, and art as a whole, serve as the materials for this research. Opinion of the opponents from democratic school is demonstrated on the example of the article “Dreams and Reality” by the author of the satirical magazine “Iskra” Pavel Medvedev. The article examines polemical dialogue between the two schools, analyzes and compares the arguments provided by its representatives. The article describes various mechanisms that allow using aesthetic beliefs as the foundation for creating a parodistically distorted personality and as a method for exposing the true views. The cycle by P. A. Medvedev “Dreams and Reality”, which combines the attributes of satirical parody and satire itself, was created as an instrument that is able to discredit publicizing of A. A. Fet in his essays “From the Village”, and thus unveil not only his aesthetic, but also sociopolitical position, ideology of the right-winger and advocate of serfdom. The parodist was trying to achieve such effect solely through interpretation and commenting of the statements of A. A. Fet himself.

scholarly journals IN THE WAKE OF PUGACHEV’S REBELLION: EXPERIENCE IN ORAL HISTORY

2016 ◽  
pp. 49-57
Author(s):  
N. V. Shevtsov
Keyword(s):  
Oral History ◽  
Russian Literature ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Historical Science ◽  
The Urals ◽  
History Of ◽  
Ancient Times ◽  
Xix Century ◽  
Vast Area

Grand uprising led by Pugachev seized a vast area from the middle reaches of the Volga, the Urals and the Kazakh steppes. Thousands of people from different classes and nationalities joined rebellious Ural Cossacks in 1773. From the beginning, the uprising was of antimonarchic, not noble character, although its leader, and posed as a resurrected Emperor Peter III. During two years since 1773 the rebels were holding at bay the entire Russian Empire, becoming a real threat to the power of Catherine II. Pugachev's Rebellion is a subject of numerous works of Russian historians, writers, articles, research journalists and ethnographers. But perhaps the most famous "History of Pugachev" is written by a classic of Russian literature Alexander Pushkin. His work became one of the first (if not the first) serious historical studies on Pugachev's Rebellion. The historical science of XIX century, especially its first half, doesn't know many writings on the uprising. The fact that historians did not dare to write about Pugachev and the events that took place in 1773-1775 years, as Catherine II prohibited even mention the uprising. The decree of the senate ordered even rename the place, where the described events took place, for example, the Yaik river and Yaitsk town in order "to bring all that has happened to eternal oblivion." The famous historian S.M. Solovyov did not have advance to write about Pugachev. Death interrupted his work when his 29 volume ws in process, which he planned to complete with the execution of the leader of the uprising. Russian historian V.O. Klyuchevskii did not write many pages devoted to Pugachev as well. The author of this article visited the places, where the events took place, and repeated the journey of A.S. Pushkin, who visited the region in 60years after Pugachev's Rebellion. By talking with the locals, visiting ancient towns and villages, I sought to find out what has now preserved since ancient times, whether it is possible today to see evidence of the uprising or the famous trip of A.S. Pushkin.

scholarly journals Rauner - one and a half centuries in the service of forestry in Russia

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
В.А. Липин
Keyword(s):  
State Planning ◽  
State Planning Commission ◽  
Deputy Chairman ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Government ◽  
Xix Century ◽  
First Time ◽  
Revolutionary Period ◽  
Private Collections

В статье впервые в обобщенном виде приводятся ранее неопубликованные сведения о судьбе и деятельности представителей династии выходцев из Австрии Раунеров на русской службе и в послереволюционный период. На основе архивных материалов, редких и малодоступных публикаций, а также материалов из частных собраний отражены малоизвестные страницы истории лесного хозяйства России. Непосредственно к лесному делу России имели отношение целый ряд представителей клана Раунеров. Юлий Карлович Раунер, который учился в Лисинском учебном лесничестве. С 1855 г. Ю.К. Раунер главный лесничий Екатеринбургского горного округа. Наибольшей известности в лесоводстве достиг Станислав Юльевич Раунер, лесовод, мелиоратор, теоретик и практик горно-облесительных работ, проводимых в целях борьбы с эрозией почв и селевыми потоками. После окончания Алексеевского Екатеринбургского Реального училища с 1879 по 1882 год С.Ю Раунер являлся студентом Лесного института в Петербурге. Влияние леса на режим поверхностных и подземных вод составляло предмет особенно тщательного изучения С.Ю. Раунера. С середины 80-х годов XIX в. до 1917 года С.Ю. Раунером было написано большинство научных трудов, составлено множество инструкций и программ, непосредственно по географическому, биологическому и другим исследованиям. После Революции с 1917 г. С.Ю. Раунер работал в Москве в ВСНХ в должности Заместителя председателя Госплана. В 1920 году был выбран профессором лесного института в Петрограде. For the first time, the article summarizes previously unpublished information about the fate and activities of representatives of the dynasty of come from Austria, Rauner in Russian work for the government and in the post-revolutionary period. On the basis of archival materials, rare and inaccessible publications, as well as materials from private collections, little-known pages of the history of forestry in Russia are described. A number of representatives of Rauner clan were directly involved in forestry in Russia. Julius Karlovich Rauner, who studied at the Lisinsky training forestry. Since 1855, Yu.K. Rauner is the chief forester in the Yekaterinburg mountain district. Stanislav Yulievich Rauner, a forest grower, land reclamator, theoretician and practitioner of mining and afforestation works carried out to combat soil erosion and mudflows, became the most famous in forestry. After graduating from the Alekseevsky Yekaterinburg Real School from 1879 to 1882, S.U. Rauner was a student at the Forest Institute in St. Petersburg. The influence of the forest on the regime of surface and groundwaters was the subject of a particularly thorough study by S.Yu. Rauner. Since the mid 80s of the XIX century. until 1917 S.Yu. The majority of scientific works were the rauner, many instructions and programs were compiled, directly on geographical, biological and other studies. After the Revolution since 1917, S.Yu. Rauner worked in Moscow at the Supreme Economic Council as a Deputy Chairman of the State Planning Commission. In 1920 he was chosen as a professor at the Forestry Institute in Petrograd.

scholarly journals V. M. Ploshchansky — researcher of the history of Galician Rus and Kholm Rus (a review of unpublished materials from the manuscript collection of the researcher in Vilnius)

2021 ◽  
pp. 386-406
Author(s):  
Yuriy A. Labyntsev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Library ◽  
Russian Empire ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Handwritten Documents ◽  
Long Time ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Russian Empire ◽  
Xix Century ◽  
Political Persecution ◽  
Private Collections

The article provides a general overview of the extensive manuscript heritage of one of the most prominent figures of Eastern Galicia who migrated to the Russian Empire in the XIX century — Venedikt Mikhailovich Ploshchansky (1834–1902). After being forced to leave Lviv with his family in fear of political persecution, in the spring of 1888 he became a member of the Vilna Commission for the Analysis and Publication of Ancient Acts. Here, in Vilna, he spent the last 14 years of his life, actively working, among other things, on the basis of the sources that he had collected on the territory of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. All these numerous materials, as well as the personal archive of the researcher, were apportioned after his death by a number of indigenous repositories. The main part of them immediately end up in the Vilna Public Library, although in scattered form. For a very long time, starting from the 1970s, we have been searching and analyzing the handwritten documents collected and compiled by V. M. Ploshchansky, including extensive handwritten notes and additions left by the researcher on the pages of books from his library, which appeared in various public and private collections.

scholarly journals Porcelain interior plastic of the 1950s in museums and private collections in China

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-67
Author(s):  
Yu Wang ◽  
◽  
Zhengding Liao ◽  
Keyword(s):  
National Culture ◽  
Fine Arts ◽  
Folk Art ◽  
Art Museum ◽  
Republic Of China ◽  
Porcelain Production ◽  
History Of ◽  
The 1950S ◽  
Private Collections

In the two decades since the establishment of the people’s Republic of China, the challenges facing porcelain production have changed significantly. Porcelain production is one of the most important and oldest traditions in China. In the 1950s, porcelain craftsmen became involved in the creation of new forms of interior plastics. Many of the pieces they created are now part of museum collections and represent the history of the development of Chinese interior porcelain. Using the example of three museums and three reference monuments, the article examines the key trends in the development of porcelain art and stylistic changes that occurred during this period. The following museums have been selected as examples to showcase the specifics of Chinese porcelain art from this period: the China Ceramic and Porcelain Museum located in Jingdezhen City, which is the country’s first major art museum specializing in ceramics; the Chinese Fine Arts Museum in Beijing, which specializes in collecting, researching and displaying works of Chinese artists of modern and contemporary eras; and the Guangdong Folk Art Museum, which specializes in collecting, researching and displaying Chinese folk art. All of these museums are engaged in collecting porcelain, including interior porcelain plastics from the mid-20th century. In the collections of the aforementioned museums, three works were selected for analysis. These are three paired compositions created in the second half of the 1950s: the sculpture “An Old Man and a Child with a Peach” by Zeng Longsheng, “Good Aunt from the Commune” by Zhou Guozhen and “Fifteen coins. The rat case” by Lin Hongxi. These porcelain compositions reveal close relations with Chinese national culture and not only reflect various scenes, but are also aimed at expanding the role of porcelain in decorating residential interiors.

scholarly journals PUBLICATION OF RUSSIAN LITERATURE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AGRARIAN ECONOMY AND FISHERIES IN ANCIENT SOCIETIES OF “BARBARIAN” EUROPE: MID-XIX CENTURY. – 1950 S.

2022 ◽  
pp. 146-157
Author(s):  
V. A. Erlikh
Keyword(s):  
19Th Century ◽  
Russian Literature ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Agricultural Economy ◽  
Agrarian Economy ◽  
History Of ◽  
The 1950S ◽  
Xix Century ◽  
Language Literature

   The authors presented an article on the publication of printed matter covering the history of agricultural economy and trades in Central, Northern, Northwestern, and Southwestern Europe in antiquity. The report is based on editions of Russian-language literature published in Russia in the mid-19th century - the 1950s.

scholarly journals Mit fordítsunk?

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1–2) ◽  
Author(s):  
József Goretity
Keyword(s):  
National Culture ◽  
Russian Literature ◽  
Literary Work ◽  
Foreign Literature ◽  
History Of ◽  
Well Differentiated

The study focuses on the reception of Russian literature, more precisely contemporary Russian literature. The author of the article examines the question whether and how much a translated literary work can become an integral part of the recipient culture and what are those fundamental aspects based upon which a national culture, as a recipient, “chooses” certain works of a foreign literature to be translated. After outlining the history of Hungarian reception of translated Russian literature the paper introduces in detail the last 35 years of Hungarian reception of Russian literature, including the well-differentiated periods and the aspects of reception. The paper aims to answer the question fundamental in Russian-Hungarian translation as well: ‘What to translate?’

scholarly journals V.P. Adrianova-Peretts’s Memorial Library As an Artifact of History of Russian Philological Science Rising

2019 ◽  
pp. 100-116
Author(s):  
Андрей Бородихин ◽  
Andrey Borodihin ◽  
Алексей Юдин ◽  
Aleksey Yudin
Keyword(s):  
Literature Search ◽  
Russian Literature ◽  
Rare Book ◽  
National Cultures ◽  
Saint Petersburg ◽  
Russian Academy Of Sciences ◽  
History And Literature ◽  
History Of ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

The article characterizes V.P. Adrianova-Peretts’s memorial library that is currently divided into two parts stored in Rare Book and Manuscript Department of the SPSTL SD RAS (Novosibirsk) and the Library of the Institute of the Russian Literature (Pushkin House of the Russian Academy of Sciences) (Saint Petersburg). The collection is based on books purchased by V.N. Peretts (i.e., academician, V.P. Adrianova-Peretts’s husband). The library summarizes research interests because it includes books related to philology, history and literature search methodology, as well as ethnographic and folk books dedicated to various national cultures. The memorial library contains several rarities. Authors analysed the library composition and sources of several books. Several inscriptions and autographs observed on the library books were submitted and analysed. Records of famous scientists (historians, ethnographers, philologists etc.) were detected among them. Unique D.S. Likhachyov’s inscriptions designed as ornaments of ancient Russian manuscripts were particularly noted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document