The Land Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Revaluation of Papua Special Autonomy

The purpose of Special Autonomy for Papua is to resolve the source of the problem in Papua, especially concerning the rights of indigenous peoples. Normatively, the background of local autonomy for Papua is affirmed in Act No. 21 of 2001 on Papua Special Autonomy. The results shows that the recognition and protection of the land rights of indigenous peoples have been set clearly in the national legal system, such as Agrarian Law, Forest Law, as well as in Mineral and Coal Mining Law. However, recognition and protection of indigenous peoples’ rights to land in various legal products is still ambivalent. The essence of protection of indigenous peoples’ rights to land is also clearly regulated in Act No. 21 of 2001 and Perdasus No. 23 of 2008 has put customary law community on ownership of communal land is not the object of development, especially in the field of investment. The customary right and indigenous land which is the property and become an authority on indigenous peoples must be recognized by the government and regional and national communities about its presence. Therefore, the government should strive to protect the customary right through regulation of the Ministry of Agrarian and Land Agency and other laws related to the issue of customary rights, customary lands, indigenous peoples and their authority.

Download Full-text

HAK KOMUNAL ATAS TANAH SEBAGAI HAK ATAS TANAH DESA PAKRAMAN DI BALI

VYAVAHARA DUTA ◽

10.25078/vd.v13i2.682 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 13 (2) ◽

pp. 9

Author(s):

Made Oka Cahyadi Wiguna

Keyword(s):

Social Interaction ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Land Rights ◽

Customary Law ◽

Law System ◽

Village Leader ◽

Communal Land ◽

The Subject ◽

The Government

The government has indeed provided legal protection and certainty to indigenous peoples regarding their ulayat lands, through a Ministerial Regulation. However, it needs to be studied more deeply about the concept of communal rights to land and Pakraman village as the subject of communal rights holders on land. Communal rights to land are conceptualized as models of land rights that have just been raised in the national land law system. The consequence is that indigenous and tribal peoples as communal rights holders are authorized to use and benefit from their communal land. Pakraman village qualifies as a subject of communal rights to land because Pakraman village in Bali is classified into the community of the community, has a system of customary government referred to as the traditional prajuru led by a customary village leader. Then Pakraman village has a legal area called the Palemahan Pakraman village. As an instrument that regulates the life and social interaction of the community, awig-awig is the customary law of the community in a Pakraman village in Bali.

Download Full-text

KEDUDUKAN HAK ATAS TANAH MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM

DiH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ◽

10.30996/dih.v13i25.2223 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 13 (25) ◽

pp. 69-84

Author(s):

Jhon A Mebri

Keyword(s):

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Public Interest ◽

Human Life ◽

Land Rights ◽

Close Correlation ◽

Customary Law ◽

Economic Resource ◽

Customary Rights ◽

The Government ◽

Customary Land

Land has a very important meaning in human life, because most of human life depends on the land. There is a close correlation between man and the land and there is no human in this world who does not need the land. The land is not only understood as an economic resource, but for others it sees the land as sacred and one of the indigenous peoples of Papua must preserve. So with the government policy to allocate land for public interest often conflict with the interest of indigenous people of Papua. Related to the procurement of land is regulated in Law No. 2 of 2012 on Land Procurement for Development for Public Interest. The focus of this research is how to recognize and regulate land rights of indigenous and tribal peoples for the public interest in Papua and how are the legal effects on customary land rights for indigenous and tribal peoples in Papua? By using normative research methods it can be concluded that the recognition and regulation of indigenous peoples' rights to land as customary rights in accordance with the provisions of the Basic Agrarian Law, the Law on Special Autonomy and Law No. 6 of 2014 on Villages, is recognized Of its existence and use in accordance with applicable provisions in indigenous and tribal peoples. However, in practice it is often not in accordance with the provisions in force in Indonesia, so as not to provide justice and legal certainty.The legal consequences of customary law community land acquisition for public interest are the form of indemnity for indigenous and tribal peoples through the agreed mechanism and the transfer of land rights of customary law community to the government.

Download Full-text

Strategi Penyelesaian Pendaftaran Tanah Hak Komunal Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta

Tunas Agraria ◽

10.31292/jta.v2i1.17 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2 (1) ◽

pp. 45-69

Author(s):

Ardi Saputra Sinaga ◽

Julius Sembiring ◽

Sukayadi Sukayadi

Keyword(s):

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Research Method ◽

Legal Status ◽

Land Rights ◽

Customary Law ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Land Registration ◽

Communal Land ◽

Community Strategy ◽

Land Control

Abstract: Environment and Forestry Ministry established the reserve incense forest of the Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community as a customary forest. But in reality, it has not been guaranteed legal certainty regarding the existence and recognition of the rights of the Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. The objective of this research is to know the le-gal status of Indigenous Peoples forest in Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law at this time, strategy of the land registration of communal right settlement, and constraint and effort done in the land registration of communal right settlement of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. This research uses qualitative research method with empirical juridical research form. Based on the results of the study showed that the legal status of the Indigenous Forests of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Society is currently reserved as customary forest of Pan-dumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. Strategy for resolving communal rights land registration in the incense forest of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community through four stages. First, recognition of the existence of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community. Secondly, the establishment of customary forests of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community by Environment and Forestry Ministry. Third, the Settlement of Land Control in Forest Areas is carried out in accordance with Presidential Regulation Number 88 of 2017 by issuing customary forests of the Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Customary Law Community from forest areas. Fourth, registration of communal land rights of Pandumaan-Sipituhuta Custom-ary Law Community.Keywords: strategy, communal rights, customary forestsIntisari: Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan (KLHK) menetapkan pencadangan hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta sebagai hutan adat. Tetapi kenyataannya, keadaan tersebut hingga saat ini dinilai belum menjamin kepastian hukum akan keberadaan dan pengakuan hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menjelaskan bagaimana strategi penyelesaian pendaftaran tanah hak komunal hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa status hukum hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta saat ini dicadangkan sebagai hutan adat. Strategi penyelesaian pendaftaran tanah hak komunal hutan kemenyan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta melalui empat tahapan. Pertama, pengakuan keberadaan Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta. Kedua, penetapan hutan adat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta oleh KLHK. Ketiga, dilakukan Penyelesaian Penguasaan Tanah dalam Kawasan Hutan sesuai dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 88 Tahun 2017dengan cara mengeluarkan hutan adat Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta dari kawasan hutan. Keempat, pendaftaran tanah hak komunal Masyarakat Hukum Adat Pandumaan-Sipituhuta.Kata Kunci : strategi, hak komunal, hutan adat

Download Full-text

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI TANAH ULAYAT MASYARAKAT ADAT KESULTANAN DELI AKIBAT NASIONALISASI NV DELI MAATSCHAPPIJ [Legal Protection of the Communal Land Rights of the Deli Sultanate due to the Nationalization of NV Deli Maatschaapij]

Law Review ◽

10.19166/lr.v20i1.2401 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

pp. 46

Author(s):

Jeremy Aidianto Naibaho ◽

Bambang Daru Nugroho ◽

Yusuf Saepul Zamil

Keyword(s):

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Land Rights ◽

Library Research ◽

National Economic ◽

Communal Land ◽

The Government ◽

Plantation Company ◽

Customary Land ◽

The Impact

Abstract Nationalization of a Dutch-owned plantation company, NV Deli Maatschappij, was an attempt by the government to improve national economic situation. However, during the process, communal land which was concessioned to the plantation, was also nationalized and not given compensation by the government which resulted the indigenous people of Deli Sultanate losing their customary land. The former plantation land was converted to Cultivation Rights and handed over to the State Plantation Company This problem led to a prolonged conflict over ownership of the former estate. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of the nationalization process carried out by Indonesian government on the existence of indigenous peoples’ customary land rights and obtain settlement of customary land rights of indigenous peoples as the impact on nationalization. Furthermore, this research is normative legal research (library research) with a statutory approach (statue approach). Keywords: Nationalization, Communal Land, Compensation Abstrak Proses nasionalisasi Perusahaan Perkebunan milik Belanda, yaitu NV Deli Maatschappij adalah upaya pemerintah untuk memperbaiki perekonomian Negara. Namun dalam pelaksanaannya tanah ulayat yang dikonsesikan kepada perkebunan juga ikut ternasionalisasi dan tidak diberikan ganti kerugian oleh pemerintah yang berakibat Masyarakat Adat Kesultanan Deli kehilangan tanah ulayatnya. Tanah bekas perkebunan diubah menjadi Hak Guna Usaha dan diserahkan kepada Perusahaan Perkebunan Negara. Hal ini menimbulkan konflik berkepanjangan tentang kepemilikan tanah bekas perkebunan tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif (library research) dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statue approach). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai keabsahan proses nasionalisasi yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Indonesia terhadap eksistensi hak ulayat Masyarakat Adat dan memperoleh penyelesaian sengketa tanah ulayat Masyarakat Adat sebagai dampak atas nasionalisasi. Kata Kunci: Nasionalisasi, Tanah Ulayat, Ganti Rugi

Download Full-text

Konstitusionalitas Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat atas Hak Ulayat Rumpon di Provinsi Lampung

Jurnal Konstitusi ◽

10.31078/jk1431 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 14 (3) ◽

pp. 463

Author(s):

Ahmad Redi ◽

Yuwono Prianto ◽

Tundjung Herning Sitabuana ◽

Ade Adhari

Keyword(s):

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Research Method ◽

Legal Aspects ◽

Coastal Communities ◽

Customary Law ◽

Fishing Gear ◽

Constitutional Protection ◽

Customary Rights ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government

Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD NRI 1945 mengatur mengenai penghormatan dan pengakuan atas satuan-satuan masyarakat hukum adat beserta hak-hak tradisionalnya sepanjang keberadaannya masih ada. Salah satu hak masyarakat adat di masyarakat pesisir di Provinsi Lampung ialah hak rumpon sebagai hak ulayat laut. Rumpon laut secara bahasa merupakan jenis alat bantu penangkapan ikan yang dipasang di laut, baik laut dangkal maupun laut dalam. Saat ini eksistensi rumpon laut terancam keberadaannya karena untuk menjaga dan melestarikan sistem pengelolaan perikanan ini tidak didukung oleh tindakan nyata oleh Pemerintah dan masyarakat sekitar pesisir. Tulisan ini melakukan pengkajian atas hak masyarakat hukum atas hak ulayat rumpon di Provinsi Lampung dengan fokus penelitian pada eksistensi hak ulayat laut rumpon pada masyarakat Lampung dan perlindungan konstitusional atas hak ulayat rumpon laut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode socio-legal yang melakukan kajian terhadap aspek hukum dalam ranah das sollen dan das sein.Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the respect and recognition on customary law community units and their traditional rights as long as they still exist. One of the rights of indigenous peoples in coastal communities in Lampung Province is rumpon’s right as the ulayat right of the sea. Literaly, Rumpon laut is a type of fishing gear installed in the sea, both the shallow and the deep one. Currently the existence of rumpon laut is threatened because the maintenance is not supported by concrete actions by the Government and coastal communities. This paper conducts an assessment of the community’s right on customary rights of rumpon laut in Lampung Province. This paper focuses on the existence of the ulayat right of rumpon laut in Lampung and the constitutional protection of the ulayat right of rumpon laut. The research method used is a sociolegal method that studies the legal aspects in the realm of das sollen and das sein.

Download Full-text

EKSISTENSI MASYARAKAT ADAT TERGERUS OLEH KEBUTUHAN ZAMAN Studi Analisis Konflik Masyarakat Adat Sunda Wiwitan di Kuningan yang Terusir dari Tanah Adatnya Sendiri dengan Teori Identitas

Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik ◽

10.24198/jkrk.v1i1.20892 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 44

Author(s):

Rachel Farakhiyah ◽

Maulana Irfan

Keyword(s):

Conflict Resolution ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Customary Law ◽

District Court ◽

Court Ruling ◽

Land Disputes ◽

Customary Rights ◽

The Government ◽

Customary Land ◽

Privately Owned

Pengakuan pemerintah terhadap hukum adat masih setengah hati. Padahal, eksistensi hukum adat memiliki landasan konstitusional yang kuat dalam Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD 1945. Tubrukan antara proyeksi pembangunan dari pemerintah, kepentingan masyarakat umum, beserta hak ulayat dari masyarakat adat, telah menimbulkan gesekan yang sangat rentan akan timbulnya konflik. Seperti halnya yang memicu terjadinya konflik yang memanas di dalam masyarakat sunda wiwitan atas sengketa lahan. Yang mana perlakuan Jaka yang mengklaim tanah adat menjadi tanah milik pribadi sebagai bentuk pelanggaran hukum adat dan kemudian ditambah dengan putusan PN Kuningan yang memanangkan permintaan Jaka atas hak milih tanah adat seluas 224 m2. Putusan PN tersebut dinilai cacat hukum dan tidak memperhatikan asal usul sejarah. Maka hal tersebut menimbulkan berbagai aksi perlawanan dari pihak kubu masyarakat adat Sunda Wiwitan untuk berusaha memperoleh kembali haknya atas tanah adat mereka. Tujuan penulisan artikel ini yaitu untuk menjelaskan latarbelakang terjadinya konflik dan pemicu terjadinya konflik dengan menggunakan teori identitas yang nantinya dapat dirumuskan resolusi konflik yang efektif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini yaitu menggunakan studi litelatur yang diperoleh dari jurnal,buku, dan berbagai macam berita. Hingga saat ini konflik yang bergulir belum menemukan kejelasan karena belum terdapat resolusi konflik yang jelas dan masih sampai kepada tahap digagalkannya proses eksekusi tanah adat seluas 224 m2oleh Pengadilan Negri Kuningan. Government recognition of customary law is still half-hearted. In fact, the existence of customary law has a strong constitutional foundation in Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. Collisions between projected development from the government, the interests of the general public, along with customary rights from indigenous peoples, have created a very vulnerable friction in the emergence of conflict. As is the case that triggered a heated conflict in Sunda Wiwitan society over land disputes. Which is the treatment of Jaka who claimed customary land to be privately owned as a form of violation of customary law and then added with the Kuningan District Court decision to adopt Jaka's request for customary land rights of 225 m2. The Kuningan District Court ruling was deemed legally flawed and did not pay attention to the origin of history. So this caused various acts of resistance from the sides of the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous people to try to regain their rights to their customary lands. The purpose of writing this article is to explain the background of the occurrence of the conflict and the trigger for the occurrence of conflict by using identity theory which can later be formulated effective conflict resolution. The method used in writing this article is to use litelatur studies obtained from journals, books, and various kinds of news. Until now the rolling conflict has not yet found clarity because there is no clear conflict resolution and is still up to the stage where the process of execution of customary land of 225 m2 was thwarted by the Kuningan District Court.

Download Full-text

Bentuk-Bentuk Kekuasaan dalam Pemanfaatan Tanah Ulayat di Kabupaten Kampar

Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Nakhoda ◽

10.35967/jipn.v17i1.7057 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 17 (1) ◽

pp. 39

Author(s):

Wan Asrida ◽

Raja Muhammad Amin ◽

Auradian Marta

Keyword(s):

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Land Tenure ◽

Phenomenological Approach ◽

Customary Law ◽

Added Value ◽

Regional Government ◽

Land Conflicts ◽

Technical Data ◽

Communal Land ◽

The Government

This research attempts to analyze the forms of power in the utilization of communal land in Kampar Regency. The interests of indigenous peoples in terms of ulayat land tenure feel threatened by the existence of plantation corporations by bringing large investments which ultimately provide economic added value for the Government and Regional Government. This study uses qualitative research methods with a phenomenological approach. Data was obtained through interviews conducted with elements of the Kampar District Government, Lembaga Adat Kampar (LAK), the Archipelago Indigenous Peoples Alliance (AMAN) Kampar, and traditional leaders. Technical data analysis in this study was conducted interactively. The argument from this study shows that there are 2 (two) forms of power that influence the implementation of ulayat land use in Kampar Regency. The first is visible power, where the practice of power occurs in the formal sphere in the policy-making process of recognizing and protecting customary law communities in Kampar District. In addition, the practice of visible power is also evident from the interaction between actors in resolving communal land conflicts that occurred in Kampar District. While the second form of power in the utilization of communal land is hidden power. This hidden power practice is carried out by corporate actors who are suspected of taking over customary land by playing their power in licenses issued by the Government.

Download Full-text

Pemberian Hak Guna Usaha di Atas Tanah Hak Komunal Menurut Hukum Pertanahan di Indonesia

Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ◽

10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2204.161-166 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 161-166

Author(s):

Ni Ketut Krismanika ◽

I Putu Gede Seputra ◽

Luh Putu Suryani

Keyword(s):

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Land Rights ◽

Third Party ◽

Customary Law ◽

Analysis Approach ◽

Legal Research ◽

Communal Land ◽

The Future ◽

Legal Concepts

The granting of Communal Rights Certificates is done according to Article 18 of the MATR / KBPN regulation No. 10/2016, if it has been decided that by the Governor, the Regent / Mayor in that place there are indeed indigenous peoples, the Officer will report to the Ministry of National Land Agency (hereinafter abbreviated as BPN) so that it is not changed and the registration of Communal Rights for the land contained therein in that area. This study aims to determine the mechanism for granting communal land rights certificates for customary law associations and also to identify tenure rights with communal rights based on agrarian arrangements. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory approach and analysis approach and legal concepts. The results of this study indicate that the Decree of the Minister of Land said that if the results of the research there were indigenous peoples and their land, the inauguration of the indigenous peoples was decided by the ministry of MATR / BPN of the region to determine and register communal rights over their land in the region's BPN. The communal rights being applied for will be issued in the future the communal rights certificate of the customary law community. After the Communal Rights Certificate is issued from the BPN on behalf of the customary community, the use and use can be cooperated with a third party, in this case if there is a party who is applying for a Cultivation Right on the communal right, then the customary law community may negotiate with the applicant, in order to get the same benefits. The conclusion is that the mechanism for granting communal land rights certificates to customary law associations starts from the report of the customary head to the Regent / Mayor and the granting of Building Use Rights on Communal Rights land is allowed as long as Communal Rights as long as the customary community wants to relinquish these rights or exchange with other land.

Download Full-text

KEDUDUKAN HUKUM HAK ULAYAT MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN OTONOMI DAERAH (STUDI DI KECAMATAN HARIAN KABUPATEN SAMOSIR)

Jurnal Darma Agung ◽

10.46930/ojsuda.v29i1.940 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 29 (2) ◽

pp. 125

Author(s):

Mangapul Marbun

Keyword(s):

Indigenous Peoples ◽

The State ◽

Customary Law ◽

Regional Government ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Regional Autonomy ◽

Community Rights ◽

Customary Rights ◽

The Republic ◽

The Government

The position of the customary rights of the customary law community in the Toba Batak community, namely the rights owned by a clan (State land), controlled, managed, utilized, the land and its contents for the needs of the citizens / descendants of the partnership as collective property that can be passed down from generation to generation (geneological) based on customary law. The UUPA recognizes the position of the ulayat rights of the customary law community in a formal juridical manner with discussion if in reality it still exists and does not conflict with the interests of the national, nation and state. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 18-B paragraph (2), Article 28-I paragraph (3) The State recognizes and respects the customary public and their traditional rights as long as they are still alive. The cultural identity of traditional community rights is respected in accordance with the times and civilizations. The position of the customary rights of the Batak Toba community (land marga) in this study is still not as expected, in regulating and protecting laws from the past to the present, regulation and protection are still based on local customary laws. In Law No. 23/2014/9/2015 concerning Regional Government grants the authority of rights and responsibilities to provincial, regency / city governments to regulate and manage their own regions, one of the areas of defense based on the widest possible regional autonomy. The authority, rights and responsibilities of regional governments in regulating and protecting, managing their own ulayat rights (clan land) in certain areas are also in line with Presidential Decree No. 34 regarding policies in the defense sector, one of which is stipulation and is also in line with the government regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 38 Year 20007 concerning the Division of Government Affairs between the government and the Provincial Government of the Regency / City Government as a government affair which becomes the authority of the regional government towards the position of the ulayat rights of the customary law community in certain areas. In this study, in the Daily District of Samosir Regency. The authority, rights and obligations of Regional Government through stipulation in the form of Regional regulations have not been implemented, especially regarding local clan lands (ulayat rights of indigenous peoples). Therefore, this problem needs to be researched to get a true picture of the status of customary community rights in relation to regional autonomy in the Daily District of Samosir Regency. The results of this study, in the Samosir Kewenagan Regency Daily sub-district, the rights and obligations of regional government, it turns out that Tanah Marga (Hak Ulayat) is still regulated by local customary law, in fact the local government has the authority, rights and obligations to regulate and protect Ulayat Rights (Tanah Marga). certain by stipulation in the form of regional regulations, with the aim of providing legal certainty and benefits for the customary law community. Based on the research, it shows that the Land of Marga / Ulayat Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Harian District, generally in Samosir Regency, both horizontally and vertically until this research was conducted, there has been no settlement of certain customary rights of customary communities, in other words conflict resolution is still stagnant. The government needs to immediately establish the customary rights of customary communities in the form of a law. To ensure legal certainty / benefit and justice for all certain Customary law communities. Because ulayat rights are basically still found and still live according to the civilization of the Batak Toba people in the Daily District of Samosir Regency, which does not conflict with the development and interests of the Nation and the State.

Download Full-text

PENGAKUAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK ULAYAT MASYARAKAT HUKUM ADAT

to-ra ◽

10.33541/tora.v1i3.1140 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 1 (3) ◽

pp. 183

Author(s):

Hidayat Hidayat

Keyword(s):

Indigenous People ◽

Indigenous Peoples ◽

Indigenous Communities ◽

The State ◽

Customary Law ◽

National Scale ◽

Communal Land ◽

Customary Rights ◽

Agrarian Law

Recognition of the existence of customary rights by Article 3 of the Basic Agrarian Law is a natural thing, because along with the customary rights of indigenous communities have existed before the formation of the state of Republic Indonesia. However, many cases of communal land which arise in the regional and national scale, will never obtain settlement completely without any objective criteria necessary as a benchmark determinants of the existence of customary rights and their implementation. Criteria for deciding about the existence of customary rights is composed of three elements, namely the existence of a particular customary law community, the presence of certain customary rights into the environment and the purpose of taking the lives of indigenous people, and the existence of customary law regarding the maintenance of order, control and use lands which apply and be adhered to by the indigenous peoples. Metode of reserach is juridis normative. The results of reaserach shows that there is no regulatory of customary right, and the rule is still from the society. The rule of customary right can be gap to customary rights, in fact lowest.Kata Kunci : Pengakuan hukum, Hak ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat

Download Full-text