Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Round Table Terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMAN 101 Jakarta

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Belva Yessica Grace Morainauli

This study aims to determine whether the Round Table cooperative learning model influences the mathematical communication skills of students of SMAN 101 Jakarta. This research was conducted in the even semester of the 2018/2019 academic year on the subject of Lines and Series. The research method used was quasi-experimental. The target population of this study were all students of SMAN 101 Jakarta and the affordable population in this study were students of XI MIPA. The sampling technique uses cluster random sampling technique. The research instrument used was a test of mathematical communication skills as many as four description questions. the instrument has gone through content validation tests, construct validation and empirical validation. After the instrument is valid, reliability is tested where the correlation coefficient obtained is 0.5602. After testing the normality, homogeneity and similarity of averages and cluster random sampling. XI MIPA 2 was chosen as the control class and XI MIPA 4 as the experimental class. Based on the calculation of the research data of the two classes, each of them is normally distributed and has the same or homogeneous variance. Therefore, hypothesis testing is done by using t-test statistics with a significant level α = 0.05. Based on the results of the test, the value of tcount = 2.43499 and t table = 1.6682 is obtained, so that it gets tcount> ttable. So reject H0. This shows that there is the influence of Round Table cooperative learning model on mathematical communication skills of students of SMAN 101 Jakarta.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Febri Intan Ratmadani ◽  
Ahmad Ahmad

This study aimed to detemine whether Student Facilitator And Explaining cooperative learning model affected students mathematical communication skills. The research design used was Posttest Only Control Design. The population in this study was entire seventh grade students in SMP Negeri 2 Somagede. Sampling was determined using Cluster Random Sampling technique. Two classes of sample were obtained. Class VII B, consistend of 23 students, selected as the experimental class which employed cooperative tipe Student Facilitator And Explaining learning model and class VII D, consisted of 23 students, was as the control class which used direct learning. Research results indicated that mathematical communication skills of students who attended Student Facilitator And Explaining learning was better than that of students who attended direct learning. So it can be interpreted that Student Facilitator And Explaining learning cooperative model affected students mathematical communication skills


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 164
Author(s):  
Fibri Rakhmawati ◽  
Wisnu Syahputra

<p class="Afiliasi" align="left"><strong>Abstrak:</strong></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran dan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaraan kooperatif tipe <em>Think Pair Share </em>(TPS) dan <em>Group Investigation </em>(GI).<strong> </strong>Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif, dengan jenis penelitian <em>quasi eksperimen</em>. Populasinya adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI MIA MAN 1 Medan tahun ajaran 2018-2019 yang berjumlah 372 siswa. Sampel yang digunakan oleh peneliti adalah kelas XI MIA 6 dan XI MIA 7 yang masing-masing berjumlah 45 siswa untuk dijadikan kelas eksperimen yang ditentukan dengan cara <em>Cluster Random Sampling.</em> Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan instrumen kemampuan penalaran dan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa. Analisis data dilakukan dengan analisis varian (ANAVA) dan kemudian dilanjutkan dengan Uji <em>Tuckey</em>. Hasil temuan ini menunjukkan: (1) Terdapat perbedaan kemampuan penalaran dan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS dan GI Materi Pokok Integral Kelas XI MIA MAN 1 Medan; (2) Terdapat perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS dan GI Materi Pokok Integral Kelas XI MIA MAN 1 Medan; (3) Tidak terdapat perbedaan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS dan GI Materi Pokok Integral Kelas XI MIA MAN 1 Medan; (4) Tidak terdapat interaksi yang signifikan antara model pembelajaran yang digunakan terhadap kemampuan penalaran dan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa. Simpulan penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa kemampuan penalaran dan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa lebih baik diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS daripada dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe GI.</p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpFirst" align="left"> </p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpLast" align="left"><strong>Kata Kunci</strong>:</p><p>Kemampuan penalaran matematis , komunikasi matematis, <em>Think Pair Share</em> (TPS), <em>Group Investigation</em> (GI)</p><p> </p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpFirst" align="left"><strong><em>Abstract:</em></strong></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle"><em>This study aims to determine the differences in reasoning abilities and mathematical communication skills of students who are taught with the Think Pair Share (TPS) and Group Investigation (GI)</em><em>. </em><em>This research is a quantitative research, with the type of quasi-experimental research. The population was all students of class XI MIA MAN 1 Medan for the 2018-2019 academic year, totaling 372 students. The sample used by the researcher was class XI MIA 6 and XI MIA 7, each of which totaled 45 students to be used as an experimental class which was determined by means of cluster random sampling.</em><em> </em><em>The data was collected using instruments of students' reasoning abilities and mathematical communication skills. Data analysis was performed with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and then continued with the Tuckey Test. The results of these findings indicate: (1) There are differences in reasoning abilities and mathematical communication skills of students taught by cooperative learning models TPS and GI type Integral Subject Class XI MIA MAN 1 Medan; (2) There are differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities taught by the cooperative learning model type TPS and GI Integral Subject Class XI MIA MAN 1 Medan; (3) There is no difference in the mathematical communication skills of students who are taught with the cooperative learning model type TPS and GI Integral Subject Class XI MIA MAN 1 Medan; (4) There is no significant interaction between the learning model used on students' reasoning abilities and mathematical communication skills. The conclusion of this study explains that students' mathematical reasoning and communication skills are better taught with the TPS-type cooperative learning model than with the GI-type cooperative learning model.</em></p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpMiddle" align="left"> </p><p class="AfiliasiCxSpLast" align="left"><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>:</em></p><p><em>Mathematical reasoning skills, mathematical communication, Think Pair Share (TPS), Group Investigation (GI)</em></p><p> </p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Nurul Huda Arianti ◽  
Syubhan Annur ◽  
Mastuang Mastuang

Student learning outcomes is still less than optimal or unsatisfactory, it can be known through the data replication midterm class XI IPA at SMAN 9 Banjarmasin. This happens because the learning methods and models used by teachers based on observations during the learning tend to be monotonous and less engaging students, so that students are less enthusiastic and less active in the following study. This study aims to determine whether there are differences in learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Pair Check with the type of Think Pair Square in class XI SMA Negeri 9 Banjarmasin. This type of research used in this research is quantitative quasi-experimental research design. This study population is all students in grade XI IPA at SMAN 9 Banjarmasin. Samples were taken using cluster random sampling. Data collection techniques are techniques achievement test and documentation. The results showed that there are differences in learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Pair Check with the type of Think Pair Square in class XI SMA Negeri 9 Banjarmasin.


Author(s):  
Lingga Nico Pradana

<p>The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models to student achievement. Learning models compared between NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. Method of research used quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x1. Population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation and test.Hypothesis testing was performed using one-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testwere concluded that NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement. </p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Aan Qonaah ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti ◽  
Abdul Fatah

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh pembelajaran generatif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi  matematis siswa berdasarkan kemampuan awal. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuasi eksperimen. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMAN 6 Pandeglang,  kelas XI yang berjumlah 9 kelas. Dengan teknik purposive sampling diperoleh kelas XI IPA 4 sebagai kelas kontrol dan kelas XI IPA 5 sebagai kelas eksperimen. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalahThe nonequivalentpretest-postest control group design. Selama penelitian berlangsung kelompok eksperimen diberi perlakuan model pembelajaran generatif sedangkan kelas kontrol menggunakan model pembelajaran ekspositori. Analisis data dilakukan terhadap rataan gain ternormalisasi antara dua kelompok sampel. Hasil penelitian ini adalah (1) Peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa  yang  diberi  perlakuan model pembelajaran generatif  lebih tinggi  daripada siswa  yang mendapat model pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) Terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan kemampuan awal matematis (KAM) terhadap peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa; (3) Terdapat peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis pada siswa dengan KAM tinggi; (4) Tidak terdapat peningkatan kemampuan komunikasi matematis pada siswa dengan KAM sedang dan rendah. Kata kunci: kemampuan komunikasi matematis, pembelajaran generatif, kemampuan awal matematika   Abstract This study aims to look at the effect of generative learning to improve students' mathematical communication skills based on early mathematic abilities. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were students of SMAN 6 Pandeglang, class XI which numbered 9 classes. The purposive sampling technique was obtained in class XI IPA 4 as the control class and class XI IPA 5 as the experimental class. The research design used was The Nonequivalent Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. During the research, the experimental group was treated with generative learning models while the control class used the expository learning model. Data analysis was performed on normalized gain average between two sample groups. The results of this study are (1) Increased mathematical communication skills of students who are treated with a generative learning model higher than students who get an expository learning model; (2) There is an interaction between the learning model and early mathematic abilities (EMA) on improving students' mathematical communication skills; (3) There is an increase in mathematical communication skills in students with high EMA; (4) There is no increase in mathematical communication skills in students with moderate and low EMA. Keywords:mathematical communication ability, generative learning, early mahthematics ability


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42
Author(s):  
Fahkur Setiaji ◽  
Suherman Suherman

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the discovery learning model integrated learning start with a question of mathematical communication skills. This research is a quantitative research with a type of quasi experiment. The sampling technique in this study is the random sampling technique. Data collected through interview observation and test. The data analysis technique used is the uncorrelated t test. Based on the results of research and data processing, it was found that there was an influence of discovery learning integrated learning model start with a question and discovery learning learning model on mathematical communication skills. Furthermore, mathematical communication of students by using the discovery learning model integrated learning start with a question is better than mathematical communication of students using discovery learning learning models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andi Mulawakkan Firdaus

This research is a quasi-experimental study which aims to describe the effect of cooperative learning type Think Pair Share (TPS) on students' mathematical communication skills, and to find out the percentage of students' activeness in participating in learning and knowing students' positive responses to learning. The output that will be generated in this study is that students can be more active in the learning process, more active in solving mathematical problems, and can be more confident in expressing their answers in public so that after applying cooperative learning models the Think Pair Share (TPS) mathematical communication skills of students will be better. The research subjects were divided into 2 groups, namely the experimental group taught using the cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS) type, and the control group taught using Conventional learning models. Each group is taught with the same frequency of meetings with the same material. The results of the study show that the application of the cooperative learning model Think Pair Share (TPS) influences students' mathematical communication skills


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Uci Sulistiarini ◽  
Hairida Hairida ◽  
Fitriani Fitriani

ABSTRACTThis study aimed to find out students’ communication skills after using cooperative learning model type pair checks and by lecturing and discussion method, to know the difference of students’ learning results after using cooperative learning model type pair checks and by lecturing and discussion method, and also to know the effectiveness of usng cooperative learning model type pair checks. It is a quasi experimental. Research used simple random sampling technique in taking the sample. The analysis of students learning results reported that the mean of students in experimental class 86,94 % is higher than the mean of students in control class 64,30 %. The analysis of students communication skills results reported that the percentage of students communication skills in experimental class 84% is higher than the percentage of students’ communication skills in control class 65%. The result of statistic test with α = 5 % the value is 0,00 which is lower than α (0,00<0,005). It means that there are some differences between esperimental class and control class. Effect size showed ES = 1,22 categorized as high, which means that cooperative learning model type pair checks affect significantly to students’ learning results as 38,69%.Keywords: Learning results, communication skills, Solubility and Solubility Product, Type of Pair Checks


Author(s):  
Komang Talita Putri Sri Dewati ◽  
Basori Basori ◽  
Agus Efendi

<p>The purpose of this research is to study the effects of Jigsaw IV and Reverse Jigsaw cooperative learning model from participation and achievement (cognitive abilities). The method used in this research was the experiment 2x2 factorial design. The population was students (X Class) of SMK N 3 Surakarta. This research used a cluster random sampling technique. The techniques of collecting data of this research were the interview, observation, questionnaire, and testing. The techniques of data analysis were used as a two-way analysis of variance. Based on this research, it could be concluded as follows: (1) there is a different influence between application of Jigsaw IV and Reverse Jigsaw cooperative learning model based on students' cognitive ability (Sig. = 0,045 &lt; 0,05), (2) there is a different influence between the high and low category of students' participation toward cognitive ability (Sig. = 0,000 &lt; 0,05), (3) there is an interaction between the influence of cooperative learning type Jigsaw IV and Reverse Jigsaw application and students' participation toward students' cognitive ability (Sig. = 0,027 &lt; 0,05). The result of this research could be put into consideration for the teacher to application Jigsaw IV and Reverse Jigsaw cooperative learning model in the learning activity.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document