scholarly journals THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INDONESIAN CRIMINAL CODE DERIVED FROM THE YUDICIAL PARDON VALUE IN ISLAMIC LAW

ADDIN ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 295
Author(s):  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Jawade Hafidz
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Legal Development

This paper aims to make efforts to develop the Criminal Code derived from the yudicial pardon value in Islamic law as a law that lives and thrives in society. The Criminal Code as the basis of criminal law enforcement is a legacy of the Dutch era which do not know peace to end up the case. It is not in accordance to Pancasila as the basis for legal development in Indonesia. Research method used socio legal and qualitative data analysis. The result of the research claims that Islamic law is a legal source in the development of the justice Criminal Code, forgiveness is possible in the <em>jarimah</em><em>-hudud</em> and <em>qisas-diyat</em> in solving the criminal case. Implementation in the development of the Criminal Code needs to be added to the reason for the abolition of criminal prosecution if between the perpetrator and the victim is already forgiven, further, in the case of a crime with a slight loss the judge may decide to be forgiven even if the defendant is found guilty.

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

scholarly journals The Criminal Enforcement Of The Fraud Mode Of Multiple Money (Case study Decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora)

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 237
Author(s):  
Sumaryono Sumaryono ◽  
Sri Kusriyah Kusriyah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public

Fraudulent criminal acts that have been regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) with various modes, one of which is fraud by shamans with a multiplied money mode has made law enforcers increasingly have to rack their brains to be able to prove it. This study aims to examine and analyze law enforcement by the judge in decision No.61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN.Blora with consideration of the criminal elements. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. The specifications of the study were conducted using descriptive analytical methods. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data. The data consists of primary data and secondary data using field research methods, interviews, and literature studies. Based on the research it was concluded that the case ruling number 61 / Pid.B / 2019 / PN Bla with a fraud case with shamanism practices in the mode of duplicating the judge's money considering that the Defendants have been indicted by the Public Prosecutor with alternative indictments, so the Panel of Judges paid attention to the facts The aforementioned law decides on the first alternative indictment as regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code Jo Article 55 paragraph (1) of the 1st Criminal Code by considering the elements of that article.Keywords: Criminal Law Enforcement; Fraud; Multiple Money.

THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF APPLYING THE PRINCIPLE OF NON BIS IN IDEM IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS RIGHT UKRAINE

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petro Olishchuk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
European Court

The article analyzes the principle of non bis in idem in the context of the criminal legislation of Ukraine, as well as the identification of cases of violations of this principle by law enforcement bodies during the qualification of criminal offences and during the issue of judicial decisions. It is noted that criminal law is a branch of law that is connected with the establishment of a ban on committing a certain act under the threat of the application by the state of measures of coercion of a criminal nature. The establishment of such a ban and the determination of measures of criminal-legal coercion, as a consequence, for its violation, is potentially related to the restriction of human rights. Obviously, the restriction of these rights cannot be arbitrary and chaotic, but must be subject to certain rules, ideas, which reflect the general development of society. These include the principles of criminal law, in particular the principle of criminal law, enshrined in art. Article 61 of the Constitution of Ukraine states: “No one can be brought to legal responsibility twice for the same type of offence”. According to Article 2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, “no one may be brought to criminal responsibility for the same criminal offence more than once”. The article highlights the characteristic features of the investigated principle. It is stated that its role is extremely important for the internal construction of the field of law, as well as the correct normalisation and law enforcement. There are cases of violations of this principle by law enforcement bodies during the qualification of criminal offences and during the issue of judicial decisions, on examples of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and Ukrainian judicial proceedings. The European Court of Human Rights’s case-law on the application of Article 4 of the Convention is inconsistent and, in some cases, even contradictory. The principle of non bis in idem in the resolution of the question of the inadmissibility of double incrimination ensures the observance of the rights of the person during the implementation of criminal prosecution, as well as ensures the completeness of criminal legal qualification, the individualization of criminal responsibility and punishment.

scholarly journals Criminalization on Husband Wife Relationship towards Nushuz in the Perspective of Islamic Law and Criminal Code

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Oom Mukarromah ◽  
Asep Ubaidillah
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Physical Violence ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Subject

The purpose of this study was to determine the criminalization law of nusyuz behavior both in Islamic law and the Criminal Code, and to know the relevance of Islamic law with the Criminal Code and Law No. 23 of 2004 in criminalization law of nusyuz behavior. The study used juridical normative approach in order to find the principle or the doctrine of positive law relevant to the issues studied, such as the opinions and ideas of jurists on the criminalization of the nusyuz behavior. This study used literature research method, which is a research conducted with data resources obtained from books or other writings relevant to the subject matter. The sources drawn from various works that discuss the problems of the family, the rights and protection of women, domestic violence and some literature on criminal law from the perspective of Islamic law and positive law. From the study, it can be concluded that: First, under the Islamic law, any form of physical violence against the wife is categorized in the form of jarimah (a criminal act) which is regulated in Islamic criminal law (fiqh jinayah). Second, in a substance, criminal law of physical violence against wife in the Domestic Violence Act is part of jarimah, a criminal act besides the soul. According to the Islamic criminal law, criminal act is classified into jarimah takzir.

scholarly journals Criminal Law Reform Toward Deprivation of Property Resulting from Corruption Criminal Acts

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-103
Author(s):  
Yogi Yasa WEDHA ◽  
Edy NURCAHYO
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Behavior ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
International Criminal Law ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Legal Development ◽  
Legal Structure ◽  
Criminological Perspective

Criminal law reform is part of criminal law policy and is closely related to law enforcement policies, criminal policies and social policies. One of the forms of national legal development reform is the Reform of the Criminal Justice System (SPP) which is an integral part of a sub-system, namely legal substance, legal structure, and legal culture. Corruption as an organized crime in Indonesia is categorized as extra ordinary crimes that have an impact on the creation of injustice in society. One of the injustices referred to is related to the non-return of state losses stolen by corruptors. Whereas efforts to recover state losses are closely related to legal instruments in force in a country.  In Indonesia, the Criminal Code and the Law on the Eradication of Corruption places the confiscation of proceeds of corruption only as an additional punishment and does not have a clear formula for the mechanism of deprivation of properties, resulting in unclarity/obscurity of norms. This condition should not occur, therefore it is necessary to reform the criminal law immediately by studying the criminal perpetrators of a criminological perspective, which is related to the factors that cause people to commit criminal acts of curruption.    This article is a study of the author concerning the importance of making legal arrangements regarding the deprivation of properties from the proceeds of corruption to mitigate the state losses. This article is compiled by applying normative legal research using statutory approaches, historical approaches, conceptual approaches and comparative approaches. It is concluded that there must be immediate reform of criminal law in Indonesia, especially regarding the deprivation of properties from the criminal act of corruption based on the development of criminal behavior (criminology) and the development of international criminal law concerning corruption.

scholarly journals PENINDAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELANGGAN DAN PEKERJA SEKS KOMERSIAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Selvidiyanti Harefa ◽  
Suriani Suriani ◽  
Ismail Ismail
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Sex Workers ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Moral Problem ◽  
Commercial Sex ◽  
Commercial Sex Workers ◽  
Structural Problem ◽  
Governing Law

Prostitution is a fundamental structural problem that occurs in society because it is still understood as a moral problem. Provisions related to prostitution are regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP), namely Article 296 and Article 506. It can be seen that criminal law only categorizes prostitution as a criminal act against its intermediaries (Pimp or Pimp). Whereas in cracking down on Customers and Commercial Sex Workers not in the Criminal Code specifically regulate it, a legal vacuum occurs. In this paper using a normative research method with the problem approach is the statutory approach. The problem raised in this paper is how the categories of perpetrators in commercial sex activities and how legal action in dealing with customers and commercial sex workers. Based on this, it can be concluded that the regulations governing law enforcement against customers and commercial sex workers are regulated based on the respective regional regulations in each region.

scholarly journals Law Enforcement towards Online Mass Media Abuse According to the Press Law

Ius Poenale ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-112
Author(s):  
Andiniya Komalla Parawita
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Mass Media ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
The Press ◽  
Article 5

The resolution process of law enforcement related to press offences differs in Indonesia. The disparity in resolving legal issues arising from press violations in Indonesia is due, in part, to differing interpretations of press regulations. Some actions were taken under Law No. 40 of 1999 Concerning the Press (Press Law). Some issues were resolved through the Criminal Code or the Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). This study is interested in looking into law enforcement against the abuse of mass media through online media in terms of press law and the Criminal Code and the barriers to its enforcement. The method used in this research is a normative juridical and empirical juridical approach. Subsequently, data analysis uses qualitative analysis methods. The paper concludes by arguing that enforcing press law against abuse of mass media through online media is accomplished by enforcing Article 5 paragraph (1) of the Press Law. However, Article 5 paragraph (1) of the Press Law does not regulate or formulate the delusions of defamation and insults as regulated in Article 310 of the Criminal Code. The absence of norms and conditions for when and in what cases the press can and cannot be brought to court for violating criminal law and sentenced to criminal sanctions is a barrier in law enforcement on the misuse of mass media through online media associated with press laws.

scholarly journals Feature of illegality in blanket dispositions of criminal offenses composition regarding disclosure of information with limited access

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yara Olena ◽  
◽  
Prokopchuk Timea ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Information Disclosure ◽  
Central Place ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Limited Access ◽  
Disclosure Of Information

The level of functioning of the legal system in any state directly depends on the improvement of the mechanism of legal regulation as well as the mechanism of law enforcement activities. The accuracy of the transition of normative provisions within the framework of specific subjective rights and legal obligations, in the context of criminal law, the definition of grounds for criminal prosecution of an individual is one of the guarantees of consolidation of the rule of law. The central place among the means that facilitate to this is occupied by legal technique. The peculiarities of constructing the dispositions of articles 111, 114, 132, 145, 159, 163, 168, 182, 209-1, 232, 232-1, 328, 330, 361-2, 381, 387, 422 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine from the technical and legal point of view have been analyzed in the article. It is determined that in a number of situations that are the subject of criminal law protection, regulatory legislation provides for cases of lawful dissemination of information with limited access, using different legal terms to mark illegal and lawful conduct. The authors concluded that the indication of «illegality» of disclosure of information in the text of the criminal law has been used incorrectly, as other factors (local regulations, law enforcement acts, the will of the owner of information, etc.) can become regulators of legality of an individual’s behavior. It is proposed to exclude from dispositions of Articles 145, 182, 232, 232-1, 361-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine the relevant feature, as well as to unify the terminology of the criminal law in terms of designation of the action. Keywords: information with limited access, secret information, disclosure of information, blanket disposition, mixed illegality

scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI HUKUM DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP KEJAHATAN MAYANTARA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1202
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Ketut Dewi Yani Putri
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Cyber Space

Tujuan penulisan ini untuk memenuhi dan melengkapi persyaratan untuk memperoleh gelar Magiter Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana. Tujuan khusus dari penulisan ini yaitu untuk mengetahui pembuktian serta yurisdiksi kejahatan mayantara dalam persidangan dan konstruksi hukum dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan merupakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Teknik yang digunakan melalui studi kepustakaan yang diperoleh langsung dari bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur hukum yang terkait. Hambatan proses pembuktian dan yurisdiksi cyber crime yakni belum diaturnya alat bukti elektronik secara sah dalam KUHAP, masih diperdebatkannya kesaksian de auditu, serta sulit menemukan saksi yang berkompeten dalam menyaksikan kegiatan cyber crime. Mengenai yurisdiksi dalam kegiatan cyber crime juga perlu diatur kembali mengingat sangatlah sukar untuk memastikan dimana kejadiannya, kapan dilakukannya dan bagaimana perbuatan pelakunya, mengingat kejahatan ini merupakan global crime yang tidak jelas yurisdiksinya di samping berkaitan dengan cyber space yang pelakunya tidak kasat mata. Adapun Kebijakan Terhadap Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime) yakni melalui  modernisasi hukum pidana adapun beberapa alternative seperti Menghilangkan beberapa pasal- pasal pada Undang- Undang Cyber Crime yang tidak dipakai lagi (usang), Mengamandemen KUHP, Mengamandemen KUHAP, Mengamandemen Undang-Undang Teknologi Informasi, Dalam Pembuktian cyber crime aparat penegak hukum terutama hakim harus berani melakukan “rechtsvinding”. The purpose of this writing is to fulfill and supplement the requirements for the Magiter degree of legal sciences at the Faculty of Law of Udayana University. The specific purpose of this writing is to know the evidence and the jurisdiction of crime between the law in the trial and the construction of laws in Indonesia's laws and regulations. The method used is a normative legal research method through a statutory approach and a concept approach. Techniques used through literature studies obtained directly from the primary legal material in the form of legislation and related legal literature. The barriers to the proving process of cyber crime and jurisdiction are not in the legitimate electronic proof tool in the criminal CODE, still in the testimony of De Auditu, and difficult to find witnesses who are competent in witnessing cyber crime activities. Regarding the jurisdiction in cyber crime activities also need to be rearranged considering that it is difficult to ensure where the event, when it does and how the perpetration, considering this crime is a global crime that is unclear its jurisdiction in addition to the cyber space that the perpetration of invisible eyes. The policy on Cyber Crime is through the modernization of criminal law as some alternative such as eliminating some of the articles on Cyber Crime laws that are not used anymore (obsolete), amend KUHP, amend KUHAP, amend the Information Technology law, in proving Cyber Crime law enforcement officials, especially the judges must dare to do "rechtsvinding".

scholarly journals Qânûn Jinâyat Aceh dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Indonesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-162
Author(s):  
Kamarusdiana Kamarusdiana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Legal Development ◽  
Aceh Province

The Jinâyat Qânûn of Aceh in the Perspective of Indonesian Legal State. Act Number 18 Year 2001 on Specific Autonomy for Aceh as the province of Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam and Act Number 11 Year 2006 on Aceh Government further confirm that the existence of Islamic law in Aceh has become national law, in terms of legal materials, law enforcement officers, as well as increasing public awareness of Islamic law in Aceh. Jinayat Qanun in Aceh province is a renewal of criminal law in Indonesia because a good law must reflect the living law in the society. Therefore, the applied law in Aceh today can be used as a model of the national legal development in Indonesia.DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v16i2.4445

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document