Impact of targeted bundles to reduce the nebulization time gap from prescription to administration among red triaged patients in emergency department: An quality improvement initiative

Author(s):  
Seema Sachdeva seema sachdeva ◽  
Akshay Kumar Akshay Kumar ◽  
Parveen Aggarwal Parveen Aggarwal

Abstract BackgroundSevere exacerbation of asthma are potentially life-threatening and therefore require prompt care and frequent management. Important elements of early treatment includes recognition of early signs and symptoms of breathing difficulty and timely prescription and administration of therapeutic agents. A subsequent delay in receiving nebulization during an acute exacerbation of asthma can leads to cardiac arrest and even death. AimTo reduce the gap in administration of nebulization from its prescription time among red triaged patients by 50% from its baseline. Setting and designThis interventional study was conducted among red triaged patients in emergency department of tertiary care hospital, India . Material and MethodsBaseline information was collected during first 4 weeks to find gap in administration of nebulization from its prescription time. Fish bone analysis and process map were laid down to analyse the situation. The intervention using targeted bundles was done via 3 PDSA (PDSA1: indenting the nebulizers, PDSA 2: training of doctors and nurses, PDSA 3; introducing equipment checklist) to reduce the gap . A run chart using time series analysis model was used to compare the pre and post intervention nebulization gap. ResultsTotal 74 patients (30 in pre- intervention, 44 in post intervention) admitted in red triaged area were observed for nebulization gap from prescription to administration. Median time for nebulization gap before intervention was 46.5 minutes which reduced to 15 minutes in post intervention phase. ConclusionThis bundles of targeted interventions was successful to reduce the nebulization gap. Key words: nebulization gap, prescription time, administration time

Author(s):  
Feroza Parveen ◽  
Asif Khaliq ◽  
Nadeem Ullah Khan ◽  
Zainab Mazhar ◽  
Aisha Akram ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of disease-based standard order sets in reducing time of order entry, order processing and medication dispensation in emergency department of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: The pilot study was conducted as part of a retrospective clinical audit using pre- and post-intervention design comprising data from July to September 2013 of the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. Data collected related to the reduction in medicine order entry, processing and dispensing time of eight common emergency conditions with standard order set.  Subsequently, standard medication orders for the selected medical conditions were developed together with physicians of emergency and other specialties. Post-intervention data was collected and the two data sets were compared using SPSS version 23.0. Results: Mean medication order entry and processing time from the physician end improved from 67.7±22.7 seconds to 20.5±7.1 seconds.  Mean order processing and medication processing and dispensing time at pharmacist end reduced from 70.0±22.4 to 20.6±8.8 seconds. The difference between pre- and post-intervention values was significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: Implementation of disease-based standard order set significantly improved efficiency. Key Words: Standard, Order sets, Emergency department, Disease, Time management. Continuous...


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Chaudhary ◽  
A Singh ◽  
R Pathak ◽  
SK Ahluwalia ◽  
RKD Goel ◽  
...  

Background: Despite the introduction of seat belt and helmet legislation their use in India is still not satisfactory. The present study was therefore conducted to assess the prevalence of and factors associated with safety belt and helmet non-use among Emergency Department (ED) patients seeking care at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Methods: The present cross sectional study with systematic sampling was carried out among stable, non-urgent ED patients aged more than 18 years using pretested questionnaire during July to December 2011. Safety belt use was defined via two methods: a single-item and a multiple-item measure of safety belt use. Results: Outcome for multivariate logistic regression analysis was safety belt use less than ‘always’. Of 350 patients approached, 280 (80%) participated. The prevalence of safety belt/helmet use ‘always’ was 31% and 16% respectively using two different survey measures. Male gender, maximum alcohol consumption of greater than 5 drinks in a single episode, riding with others that drink and drive, ever receiving a traffic citation for not wearing a safety belt or helmet, the belief that safety belt use is “uncomfortable”, and that “I just forget to use my seatbelt” were risks for safety belt non-use according to the Single Measure of Safety Belt/ Helmet Use, while “it’s my usual habit” was protective. Conclusion: Findings of the study warrants urgent need to take measures or targeted interventions in order to increase safety belt and helmet use among this high risk population. Nepal Journal of Medical Sciences | Volume 02 | Number 01 | Jan-Jun 2013 | Page 57-61 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njms.v2i1.7653


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S362-S363
Author(s):  
Gaurav Agnihotri ◽  
Alan E Gross ◽  
Minji Seok ◽  
Cheng Yu Yen ◽  
Farah Khan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Although it is recommended that an OPAT program should be managed by a formal OPAT team that supports the treating physician, many OPAT programs face challenges in obtaining necessary program staff (i.e nurses or pharmacists) due to limited data examining the impact of a dedicated OPAT team on patient outcomes. Our objective was to compare OPAT-related readmission rates among patients receiving OPAT before and after the implementation of a strengthened OPAT program. Methods This retrospective quasi-experiment compared adult patients discharged on intravenous (IV) antibiotics from the University of Illinois Hospital before and after implementation of programmatic changes to strengthen the OPAT program. Data from our previous study were used as the pre-intervention group (1/1/2012 to 8/1/2013), where only individual infectious disease (ID) physicians coordinated OPAT. Post-intervention (10/1/2017 to 1/1/2019), a dedicated OPAT nurse provided full time support to the treating ID physicians through care coordination, utilization of protocols for lab monitoring and management, and enhanced documentation. Factors associated with readmission for OPAT-related problems at a significance level of p&lt; 0.1 in univariate analysis were eligible for testing in a forward stepwise multinomial logistic regression to identify independent predictors of readmission. Results Demographics, antimicrobial indications, and OPAT administration location of the 428 patients pre- and post-intervention are listed in Table 1. After implementation of the strengthened OPAT program, the readmission rate due to OPAT-related complications decreased from 17.8% (13/73) to 6.5% (23/355) (p=0.001). OPAT-related readmission reasons included: infection recurrence/progression (56%), adverse drug reaction (28%), or line-associated issues (17%). Independent predictors of hospital readmission due to OPAT-related problems are listed in Table 2. Table 1. OPAT Patient Demographics and Factors Pre- and Post-intervention Table 2. Factors independently associated with hospital readmission in OPAT patients Conclusion An OPAT program with dedicated staff at a large academic tertiary care hospital was independently associated with decreased risk for readmission, which provides critical evidence to substantiate additional resources being dedicated to OPAT by health systems in the future. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s203-s204
Author(s):  
Rozina Roshanali

Background: My tertiary-care hospital is a 750-bed hospital with only 17 airborne infection isolation room (AIIR) and negative-pressure rooms to isolate patients who have been diagnosed or are suspected with prevalent diseases like tuberculosis, measles, and chickenpox. On the other hand, only 14 single-patient isolation rooms are available to isolate patients with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) such as CRE (carbapenum-resistant Enterobacter) or colistin-resistant MDROs. Due to the limited number of isolation rooms, the average number of hours to isolate infected patients was ~20 hours, which ultimately directly placed healthcare workers (HCWs) at risk of exposure to infected patients. Methods: Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement methodology was utilized to decrease the average number of hours to isolate infected patients and to reduce the exposure of HCWs to communicable diseases. A detailed analysis were performed to identify root causes and their effects at multiple levels. A multidisciplinary team implemented several strategies: coordination with information and technology team to place isolation alerts in the charting system; screening flyers and questions at emergency department triage; close coordination with admission and bed management office; daily morning and evening rounds by infection preventionists in the emergency department; daily morning meeting with microbiology and bed management office to intervene immediately to isolate patients in a timely way; infection preventionist on-call system (24 hours per day, 7 days per week) to provide recommendations for patient placement and cohorting of infected patients wherever possible. Results: In 1 year, a significant reduction was achieved in the number of hours to isolate infected patients, from 20 hours to 4 hours. As a result, HCW exposures to communicable diseases also decreased from 6.7 to 1.5; HCW exposures to TB decreased from 6.0 to 1.9; exposures measles decreased from 4.75 to 1.5; and exposures chickenpox decreased from 7.3 to 1.0. Significant reductions in cost incurred by the organization for the employees who were exposed to these diseases for postexposure prophylaxis also decreased, from ~Rs. 290,000 (~US$3,000) to ~Rs. 59,520 (~US$600). Conclusions: This multidisciplinary approach achieved infection prevention improvements and enhanced patient and HCW safety in a limited-resource setting.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
ghufran adnan ◽  
Osman Faheem ◽  
Maria Khan ◽  
Pirbhat Shams ◽  
Jamshed Ali

Introduction: COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed the healthcare system of Pakistan. There has been observation regarding changes in pattern of patient presentation to emergency department (ED) for all diseases particularly cardiovascular. The aim of the study is to investigate these changes in cardiology consultations and compare pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 era. Hypothesis: There is a significant difference in cardiology consultations during COVID era as compared to non-COVID era. Method: We collected data retrospectively of consecutive patients who visited emergency department (ED) during March-April 2019 (non-COVID era) and March-April 2020 (COVID era). Comparison has been made to quantify the differences in clinical characteristics, locality, admission, type, number, and reason of Cardiology consults generated. Results: We calculated the difference of 1351 patients between COVID and non-COVID era in terms of cardiology consults generated from Emergency department, using Chi-square test. Out of which 880 (59%) are male with mean age of 61(SD=15). Analysis shows pronounced augmentation in number of comorbidities [Hypertension(6%), Chronic kidney disease (6%), Diabetes (5%)] but there was 36% drop in total cardiology consultations and 43% reduction rate in patient’s ED visit from other cities during COVID era. There was 60% decrease in acute coronary syndrome presentation in COVID era, but fortuitously drastic increase (30%) in type II myocardial injury has been noted. Conclusion: There is a remarkable decline observed in patients presenting with cardiac manifestations during COVID era. Lack in timely care could have a pernicious impact on outcomes, global health care organizations should issue directions to adopt telemedicine services in underprivileged areas to provide timely care to cardiac patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 63-65
Author(s):  
Anuradha Pai ◽  
Shiksha Yadav

BACKGROUND- A 70 year old unknown male patient was found unconscious on road and was brought to tertiary care hospital. On investigations and clinical correlation, patient was diagnosed as a case of left hemiparesis secondary to acute middle cerebral artery infarct. Patient regained consciousness on next day and was in state of complete dependence for bed mobility and daily living activities. He was managed conservatively and was referred to occupational therapy department for further management. METHOD- Patient was evaluated by using uniform terminology. Modied Barthel index, Modied Rankin Scale, Basic MOCA scale and Stroke Specic QOL scales were administered. Patient was given intervention for 5 weeks. Enabling activities with self-care functional activities were practised. Accident prevention, activity promotion, Compensatory strategies and environmental modications were done. Scales were administered post intervention and comparative data was obtained. RESULT- Change of pre-intervention and post- intervention score indicates improvements in performing activities of daily living, reduced disability, improved cognition and quality of living. There were signicant improvement in activities like eating, drinking milk, in bed mobility dressing and coming to sit. Minimum to moderate improvement was seen in activities like toileting, walking, stair climbing and use of wheelchair. Despite his age and lack of family support, signicant functional improvements were documented in this elderly stroke patient, and he was discharged to old age home. CONCLUSION- Supplementing enabling activities with task oriented functional training is feasible and effective in improving independence for activity of daily living in elderly stroke


2021 ◽  
pp. 53-55
Author(s):  
Harsimran Singh Das

Introduction:qCSI (Quick COVID severity index) is a clinical tool established recently post pandemic to predict respiratory failure within 24 hours of admission in COVID-19 patients; respiratory failure being explain as increased oxygen requirement greater than 6L/min by low ow device, high ow device, noninvasive or invasive ventilation to maintain spO2 of greater than or equal to 94%, or death. Aim:To verify and validate the application of the qCSI in Emergency Department in Indian demographic for evidence-based guidance to aid physician decision making in safely dispositioning adult patients with COVID-19 with oxygen requirement less than or equal to 6L/min via low ow devices including nasal cannula and oxygen mask Materials and methods:This is an observational, retrospective study from Emergency Department in a private tertiary care hospital of admitted adult patients with COVID-19 disease. Clinical parameters in qCSI and disposition of 210 patients admitted through Emergency Department included in this study selected randomly was sought on admission and clinical status with level of care 24 hours following admission was recorded and compared with prediction based on qCSI from a period of 1 May 2020 to 31 October 2020. Result:We found that19(9.0%) patients Initial qCSI Score was Low, 80(38.1%) patients Initial qCSI Score was Low-intermediate, 84(40.0%) patients Initial qCSI Score was High-intermediate and 27(12.9%)patients Initial qCSI Score was High.qCSI Score after 24 hours 16(11.4%) patients were Low, 43(30.7%) patients were Low-intermediate, 63(45.0%) patients was High-intermediate and 18(12.9%) patients was High.Out of 210(100.0%) patients, 70 (33.3%) patients were critically ill. Conclusion:In conclusion these data show that the quick COVID-19 Severity Index provides easily accessed risk stratication relevant to Emergency Department provider.


2021 ◽  

Background: Treatment provided in an emergency department is aimed at alleviating pain immediately with minimized adverse effects as well as warding off further migraine attacks. The primary aim of this article is to compare the effectiveness of oral paracetamol versus zolmitriptan in treating acute migraine attacks. Methods: This prospective, randomized, and controlled study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital visited by 95,000 patients annually. The study recruited 200 participants who were randomized into two groups. One group received 1000 mg paracetamol while the other group received 2.5 mg zolmitriptan orally. Baseline pain scores were recorded using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 15, 30 and at 60 min following administration of the study drugs. Patients requiring further treatment were provided fentanyl at a dosage of 1 µg/kg as a rescue therapy. Results: A significant decrease was evident in VAS and NRS scores following the administration of the study drugs in both groups (P < 0.001). The change in VAS pain scores after 15, 30 and 60 min was calculated as 17.0 ± 13.9, 41.2 ± 16.3 and 61.2 ± 17.5 mm, respectively, in the paracetamol group and 14.2 ± 11.7, 39.2 ± 17.9 and 59.2± 19.3 mm, respectively, in the zolmitriptan group, which did not indicate significant differences (P = 0.103, P = 0.425, P = 0.483, respectively). Likewise, NRS pain scores showed a downward trend in line with VAS pain scores and did not yield a significant difference (P = 0.422). No significant difference concerning rescue therapy was noted between the two groups (P = 0.596). Conclusion: Oral paracetamol and zolmitriptan prove to be similarly effective and have low incidence of acute side effects in treating acute migraine cases without aura.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S440-S440
Author(s):  
Jorge A Ramos-Castaneda ◽  
Matthew L Faron ◽  
Joshua Hyke ◽  
Blake W Buchan ◽  
Rahul Nanchal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background New evidence shows the relevance of sink drains in the horizontal transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. We recently demonstrated that a peroxide-based disinfectant (product B) was better than bleach at disinfecting sink drains; however, we did not determine the duration of this effect. In this study, we evaluate the duration of bacterial reduction in sink drains treated with product B and compared it to an enhanced hydrogen peroxide agent (product A). Methods Testing was performed in a 26-bed medical intensive care unit at a 566-bed tertiary care hospital in Milwaukee, WI. Two disinfectants were compared: product A (hydrogen peroxide, octanoic acid, and peroxyacetic acid; Virasept, Ecolab) and product B (hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectant; Peroxide Multi Surface Cleaner and Disinfectant, Ecolab). Sinks were randomly assigned to product A, product B, and control (no disinfection). On day 0, baseline cultures were obtained and disinfectant agents were applied. On post-intervention days 1, 3, 5, and, 7, samples from each drain were collected using E-swabs (Copan, Italy). Quantitation of Gram-negative burden was determined by serial dilution in saline plated to MacConkey agar and dilutions that contained 20–200 colonies were used for bacterial colony-forming units (CFU). Multivariate multiple linear regression and analysis of variance were used to compare mean Ln(1+CFU) between groups using R v3.5.0. Environmental sampling, cultures, and statistical analyses were performed blinded to the disinfected used. Results All three groups had similar CFU counts at baseline (P > 0.05). On day 1, a statistically significant reduction in bacterial CFUs was observed in the group treated with product A compared with sinks treated with product B (P = 0.04) or the control group (P < 0.01). The same differences were observed on day 3 post-intervention. There were no significant reductions on days 5 and 7. Conclusion Product A was the most effective product at disinfecting sink drains but its effect disappeared at 5 days post-disinfection. These results suggest that treating sink drains every 5 days with a hydrogen peroxide mixture would be ideal for healthcare facilities dealing with sink drain contamination. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 2744-2748
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ibrahim ◽  
Zeeshan Khan ◽  
Muhammad Saeed ◽  
Israr Ahmad ◽  
Salik Kashif ◽  
...  

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the commonest mode of presentation at our sarcoma unit and the duration from onset of symptoms till presentation. Study Design: Retrospectively study. Setting: Sarcoma Unit of Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Period: June 2016 to December 2019. Material & Methods: Two hundred and eighty two patients were included in this study of which 172 patients were male and 110 were female. Sample size was calculated through non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Results: Average age of patients presenting to us was 30.2years (±18.5) ranging from 3years to 83years. Highest numbers of patients fell into the age group category of 11-20years i.e. 94 (33.33%). The average duration of symptoms among our patients was 19.6 months (±26.09) ranging from 0.1months (3 days) to 168 months (14years). Highest number of patients fell into the 7months-12months category i.e. 86 patients (30.5%). The commonest mode of presentation among our patients was painful lump i.e. 128(45.3%) while patients presenting with painless lump were 57(20.2%) and those presenting with only pain were 28(9.9%). Conclusion: The study concluded that there is a need of greater awareness amount general population and health care professionals regarding red flag signs and symptoms in order to avoid the delays in diagnosis which may leads to poor prognosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document