scholarly journals HISTORICAL STAGES OF CREATION AND LEGAL DESIGN OF AUTHORITIES OF THE STATE CONCERN “UKROBORONPROM”

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (20) ◽  
pp. 64-68
Author(s):  
A.S. Yarusevуch

The article looks at historical aspects of the approval of the sovereign Concern “Ukroboronprom”. It is signaled that the analysis of the normative legal acts have been analyzed, as well as the regulation of the power of the sovereign state registry office. The process of approval of the Sovereign Concern Ukroboronprom has been established in the process of constitutional reform of 2010. It is marked the upcoming stage of approval of the Concern: 1) an established stage; 2) this is the form of the warehouse of the participants; 3) the stage of legislative establishment is more important. I look at the period from 2010 the system of central authorities of the Wikipedia authorities until the adoption of Decree of the President of Ukraine dated 12.28.2010 No. 1245/2010 “On entering the effective efficiency of the military-industrial complex of Ukraine, we will establish a that is the creation of the sovereign Concern “Ukroboronprom”. By adopting the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, Decree No. 1221 of December 29, 10, “On the Establishment of the Sovereign Concern“ Ukroboronprom ”, marked the beginning of this form in the warehouse of the Concern by the participating companies. Period, adopting the Law of Ukraine on June 16, 2011, No. 3531-VI and the Statute of the DC “Ukroboronprom”, which, by way of law, has completed the form for the Concern as a state-owned subdivision of state-owned state-owned property complex in the system of governance of the sovereign authority and the legal field of the state. Golovnameta, the yak was rehearsed by the state at the Ukroboronprom cultural center, put in the united center for the entire defense-industrial complex of Ukraine. The process of approval of the sovereign Concern “Ukroboronprom” was established, without being transferred to documents of the defense plan and reform of the defense-industrial complex, the latest strategic strategies, and concepts. It is marked that, thanks to such reforms, the powers of the defense of the Galois industry, the z-code of the centralized administration of the state authorities was introduced. Keywords: Ukroboronprom, concern, defense-industrial complex, state control, national security and defense, state defense level.

2020 ◽  
pp. 128-131
Author(s):  
И.В. Баранова ◽  
М.А. Власенко

В статье рассмотрен гособоронзаказ как драйвер развития предприятий оборонно-промышленного комплекса, требования обеспечения финансовой устойчивости предприятий при исполнении ими гособоронзаказа. Диверсификация оборонно-промышленного комплекса РФ и конверсия производства предприятий, входящих в данный комплекс, ориентированные на производство продукции двойного назначения, а также повышение объемов продаж в среднесрочной перспективе рассматриваются как факторы повышения их финансовой устойчивости. The article considers the defense procurement and acquisition as a driver for the development of enterprises of the military-industrial complex; the requirements for ensuring the financial stability of enterprises when they perform a state contract under the state defense order. The diversification of the Russian military-industrial complex and the conversion of production of enterprises included in this complex, focused on the production of dual-use products, increasing sales in the medium term, are considered as factors for increasing the financial stability of enterprises in the military-industrial complex.


Author(s):  
Е. Гункин ◽  
E. Gunkin

In the article, on the example of one of the enterprises of the military-industrial complex — JSC CKBA, the planning system operating at the enterprise is considered, the problems of its functioning are revealed on the example of the execution of the state defense order 2017. The influence of the rhythm of production on the cost and profitability of production is established. Practical recommendations for improving the quality of planning and improving the efficiency of production activities of the enterprise are proposed. Testing of the proposals confirmed the successful performance of JSC CKBA of tasks the state defense order 2018. The results of verification of actual costs under the executed state contracts of the military representation of the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation accredited at the enterprise were used as analytical material.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 2363-2380
Author(s):  
S.B. Zainullin ◽  
O.A. Zainullina

Subject. The military-industrial complex is one of the core industries in any economy. It ensures both the economic and global security of the State. However, the economic security of MIC enterprises strongly depends on the State and other stakeholders. Objectives. We examine key factors of corporate culture in terms of theoretical and practical aspects. The article identifies the best implementation of corporate culture that has a positive effect on the corporate security in the MIC of the USA, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Japan ans China. Methods. The study employs dialectical method of research, combines the historical and logic unity, structural analysis, traditional techniques of economic analysis and synthesis. Results. We performed the comparative analysis of corporate culture models and examined how they are used by the MIC corporations with respect to international distinctions. Conclusions and Relevance. The State is the main stakeholder of the MIC corporations, since it acts as the core customer represented by the military department. It regulates and controls operations. The State is often a major shareholder of such corporations. Employees are also important stakeholders. Hence, trying to satisfy stakeholders' needs by developing the corporate culture, corporations mitigate their key risks and enhance their corporate security.


2021 ◽  
Vol 255 ◽  
pp. 01032
Author(s):  
Denys Lisovenko ◽  
Nadiia Burdeina ◽  
Oleksandr Fedchenko ◽  
Stanislav Nikul ◽  
Viacheslav Holovan

The study is devoted to the problem of financial regulation of the defense industry and the provision of troops, as the escalation of the military conflict in eastern Ukraine has revealed shortcomings in this area. A comparative analysis of NATO and Ukraine’s defense spending was conducted and differences in the cost structure were identified. The tendency of Ukraine’s defense spending to gradually approach the structure of NATO defense spending is pointed out, but the insufficient level of this approach is also taken into account. The analysis allowed to identify problematic issues and inconsistencies in the financial regulation of the defense industry. The state of export of defense equipment and technologies as a possible source of financing of defense enterprises is analyzed. The existence of two opposite trends in the financial regulation of military logistics has been identified: both an increase in funding in absolute terms and a reduction in the share of the total amount for the implementation of the unified logistics system of the State Armed Forces Development Program. The developed mathematical model of supply of military units is suitable for use in information systems of logistical support of troops.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 33-40
Author(s):  
V. V. Sinichenko ◽  

The article examines the issue of the effectiveness of the work of the Special meeting for combining measures to provide the active army with items of combat and material supplies, headed by the Minister of War. It is noted that the Special Meeting, which appeared on May 13, 1915, received extraordinary powers to carry out the economic mobilization of the entire national economy of the Russian Empire. These powers were legally formalized on August 17, 1915. From that moment in 1915, a Special meeting for the discussion and unification of measures for the defense of the state, for the provision of fuel for communication lines, state and public institutions and enterprises working for the purposes of state defense, for the food business and transportation of fuel and food and military cargo. This body, created in wartime conditions, was entrusted with extraordinary powers to manage state, public institutions and enterprises. The chairman of this meeting was the Minister of War, appointed directly by the emperor. It was he who could form commissions and subcommissions that dealt with both the procurement of weapons, equipment and equipment abroad, and directly with the implementation of a general domestic economic policy in the state for the development of certain branches of industrial and agricultural production. However, as the materials show, the transfer of management functions to the state apparatus and the entire mobilized economy of the country into the hands of the military department led to distortions in the development of the country’s national economy. Primary attention was paid to industrial enterprises working for the purposes of state defense, while the organization of food supply and transport support in the Russian Empire, despite the initiatives of the Ministry of Railways, the Ministry of Trade and Industry, the All-Russian Zemstvo Union, which had a representative in a Special Meeting, did not found due support and attention from the Chairperson of the Special Meeting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 79-83
Author(s):  
E. A. POLYATKOVA ◽  

The enterprises of the military-industrial complex, whose main income comes from the state defense order, under the conditions of the current pricing for products supplied to state customers, do not form a sufficient amount of net profit, which could be used for investment in research and development. This fact also causes difficulties in attracting bank loans and other borrowed funds to finance such projects. This article describes the practical experience of a holding company in the ammunition industry in managing the process of investing in innovative developments and problematic issues concerning funding sources for these projects.


10.12737/687 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-18
Author(s):  
Булавина ◽  
O. Bulavina ◽  
Иваница ◽  
I. Ivanitsa

The development of civilian products at the enterprises is the most important factor in ensuring the stability and performance. Only the balance between fixed and conversion production can ensure their sustainability in a competitive distribution of the state defense order and reduction in the volume of its funding due to the possible negative trends in the Russian economy. Proposed a system of indicators that have the greatest impact on the value of the share of civilian production at the enterprises of the defense-industrial complex. Proposed the approach to determining the minimum share of civilian products, allowing the company to operate effectively in the event of an unexpected reduction of the size or the lack of govement orders.


2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. Dunlop

A book published by the author in 1993 contained a lengthy chapter on the August 1991 coup attempt in the Soviet Union. This article builds on and updates that chapter, making use of a trove of newly available documents and memoirs. The article discusses many aspects of the coup attempt, but it particularly seeks to explain why the coup failed and what the implications were for the Soviet Union. The events of December 1991 that culminated in the dissolution of the Soviet Union were the direct result of changes set in motion by the failed coup. The major state and party institutions that might ordinarily have tried to hold the country together—the Communist Party apparatus, the secret police, the military-industrial complex, the Ministry of Defense, and the state administrative organs—all were compromised by their participation in the coup. As a result, when events pushed the Soviet Union toward collapse there was no way of staving off that outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document