scholarly journals Keefektifan model pembelajaran CORE dengan strategi konflik kognitif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Wahyuni Ningsih ◽  
Sugiman Sugiman ◽  
Pika Merliza ◽  
Uke Ralmugiz
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Cognitive Conflict ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design ◽  
The Core ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Conflict Strategies

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji keefektifan model pembelajaran Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending (CORE) dengan strategi konflik kognitif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi experiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 3 Yogyakarta dan dipilih  secara acak kelas VIII-C dan Kelas VIII-F sebagai sampel penelitian. One sample t-test digunakan untuk menguji keefektifan model CORE dengan strategi konflik kognitif dan model konvensional, sedangkan untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan model pembelajaran digunakan uji Manova (Hotteling’s Trace). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) model pembelajaran CORE dengan strategi konflik kognitif efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy siswa; (2) model pembelajaran CORE dengan strategi konflik kognitif lebih efektif dibandingkan model konvensional ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan self-efficacy siswa.The effectiveness of the CORE learning model with cognitive conflict strategies in terms of learning achievement, critical thinking, and self-efficacyAbstractThe study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending (CORE) learning model with cognitive conflict strategies in terms of students’ achievement, critical thinking, and self-efficacy. The study was a quasi-experiment with a pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. The population of the study was all students of 8th-grade of SMP Negeri 3 Yogyakarta (Junior High School) and randomly selected class VIII-C and class VIII-F as the sample. One sample t-test was used to examine the effectiveness of the CORE learning model with cognitive conflict strategies and the conventional model. Whereas, to examine the difference between the effectiveness of the learning model, the Manova test (Hotteling’s Trace) was used. The result of the study showed that: (1) the CORE learning model with cognitive conflict strategies was effective in terms of students’ learning achievement, critical thinking skill, and self-efficacy; (2) The CORE learning model with cognitive conflict strategies was more effective than the conventional model in terms of students’ learning achievement, critical thinking skills, and self-efficacy.

scholarly journals Implementation Cooperative Learning Type STAD Assisted Edmodo in Improving Students' Critical Thinking Skills

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Muhamad Epi Rusdin ◽  
Widodo Widodo ◽  
Guntur Maruto
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Learning At Home

The STAD cooperative learning model can support active, independent and responsible learning for students. The application of this model is expected to improve students' critical thinking skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the improvement of students' critical thinking skills using Edmodo-assisted learning models. Edmodo was modified to become a teacher tool to expand learning at home. This research is an experimental study using a pretest-posttest control group design involving 39 students of class VIII MTs At-Taqwa Beru, Sikka, East Nusa Tenggara. Based on the results of the study it was found that the Edmodo-assisted STAD type cooperative learning model can improve students' critical thinking skills.

scholarly journals Komparasi Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivis Metakognitif Dan Konstruktivis Novick Terhadap Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Akademik

INFERENSI ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Baskoro Adi Prayitno ◽  
Bowo Sugiharto
Keyword(s):  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Grade Student ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Equivalent Control

The purpose of this study was to investigate, (1) the influence of constructivist metacognitive model compared to constructivist novick, and conventional model toward critical thinking, (2) the influence of academic achievement toward critical thinking, and (3) interaction of learning model and academic achievement toward critical thinking. The sample of this study consisted of 102 eleventh grade student from 3 state senior high schools in Surakarta. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental research Pretest-Posttest, Non-Equivalent Control Group Design. Anacova was used to analyze the data. Critical thinking test was administered to the experimental and the control group as pre and post-tests to measure the critical thinking. The result showed that, (1) constructivist metacognitive and constructivist novick are not significantly different but those are significantly different from the conventional model toward critical thinking, (2) Upper academic students have higher critical thinking than lower academic students, (3) There is not interaction of learning model and academic achievement toward critical thinking

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri dengan Teknik Scaffolding terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains dan Prestasi Belajar IPA

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 230
Author(s):  
Ni ketut Erna muliastrini
Keyword(s):  
Natural Science ◽  
Science Achievement ◽  
Science Learning ◽  
Science Literacy ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Better Than

This study aimed at investigating the effect of inquiry learning model with scaffolding techniques toward ability of science literacy and natural science learning achievement. The design used in this study was using basic pattern Single Factorial Independent Group Design with quasi-experiment type. The sample used was 58 students. The data collected were ability of science literacy and naural science learning achievement. The data were analyzed by using MANOVA used SPSS 17.00 for windows. Research results showed that: First, the ability of science literacy students who were taught by using inquiry learning model with scaffolding techniques was significantly better than students who were taught by using conventional model (F = 19,982; p < 0.05). Second, the natural science achievement of students who were taught by using inquiry learning model with scaffolding techniques was significantly better than students who were taught by using conventional model (F = 13,268; p < 0.05). Third, simultaneously, the ability of science literacy and natural science learning achievement between students who were taught by using inquiry model with scaffolding techniques was significantly better than students who were taught by using conventional model.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LEARNING MODELS AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TOWARD MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT BY CONTROLLING STUDENTS’ NUMERIC APTITUDE

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
NI Nyoman Kawiwati
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Learning Achievement

This research is to determine the effect of learning model and critical thinking skills toward mathematics learning achievement of class XI IPA students in senior high school in Gianyar by controlling students’ numeric aptitude. This research used treatment by level 2x2 design and analysis of covariance. The sample was 80 people using multistage random sampling. The results by controlling numeric aptitude are: students learning achievement taught using PAIKEM model is higher than those taught in conventional model. There is an interaction effect between learning model and critical thinking skills toward students’ mathematics achievement. Given high critical thinking skills, students taught using PAIKEM models displayed higher results compared to those in conventional learning who were best in a lower critical thinking skills. Finally, based on the results, it can be recommended to SMA Mathematics teachers to increase students’ Mathematics achievement by using PAIKEM model accurately and to see of students critical thinking skills.

scholarly journals Efektivitas guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi, dan self-efficacy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-132
Author(s):  
Imaludin Agus
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
T Test ◽  
Contextual Approach ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Guided Discovery ◽  
Critical Thinking Ability ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Thinking Ability

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan guided discovery meggunakan pendekatan kontekstual dan konvensional ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy matematika siswa SMP. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi-experiment dengan pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri di Kontukowun, kabupaten Muna dan kelas VIII-1 dan Kelas VIII-2 dipilih secara acak sebagai sampel. Untuk mengetahui keefektifan guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual dan konvensional menggunakan uji one sample t-test, sedangkan untuk perbedaan keefektifan metode pembelajaran menggunakan uji two group manova. Jika terdapat perbedaan maka dilanjutkan dengan uji perbandingan menggunakan independent sample t-test. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy; metode konvensional tidak efektif ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy; dan guided discovery menggunakan pendekatan kontekstual lebih efektif dibandingkan konvensional ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis, prestasi belajar, dan self-efficacy. The effectiveness of guided discovery using the contextual approach in terms of critical thinking ability, achievement, and self-efficacyAbstractThe aim of the study aims to describe the effectiveness of guided discovery using the contextual approach in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement and self-efficacy in the mathematics of junior high school students. The study was quasi-experiment with pretest-posttest nonequivalent group design method. The population in this research was all 8th-grade students from one public junior high school in Kontukowuna, Muna Regency, Indonesia and class VIII-1 and VIII-2 were randomly selected as a sample. One sample t-test was used to determine the effectiveness of the guided discovery using the contextual approach and the conventional method. Whereas, two groups of Manova was used to know the difference between the learning methods. Then, if the result showed there is a significant difference between the two classes, the independent sample t-test was administered. Result of the study indicates that the guided discovery using the contextual approach is effective in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement, and self-efficacy; the conventional method is not effective in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement, and self-efficacy; and the guided discovery using contextual approach is more effective than conventional in terms of critical thinking ability, learning achievement, and self-efficacy.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LEARNING MODELS AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TOWARD MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT BY CONTROLLING STUDENTS’ NUMERIC APTITUDE

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-86
Author(s):  
NI Nyoman Kawiwati
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Learning Achievement

This research is to determine the effect of learning model and critical thinking skills toward mathematics learning achievement of class XI IPA students in senior high school in Gianyar by controlling students’ numeric aptitude. This research used treatment by level 2x2 design and analysis of covariance. The sample was 80 people using multistage random sampling. The results by controlling numeric aptitude are: students learning achievement taught using PAIKEM model is higher than those taught in conventional model. There is an interaction effect between learning model and critical thinking skills toward students’ mathematics achievement. Given high critical thinking skills, students taught using PAIKEM models displayed higher results compared to those in conventional learning who were best in a lower critical thinking skills. Finally, based on the results, it can be recommended to SMA Mathematics teachers to increase students’ Mathematics achievement by using PAIKEM model accurately and to see of students critical thinking skills.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LEARNING MODELS AND CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS TOWARD MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT BY CONTROLLING STUDENTS’ NUMERIC APTITUDE

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Ni Nyoman Kawiwati
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Conventional Model ◽  
Learning Achievement

This research is to determine the effect of learning model and critical thinking skills toward mathematics learning achievement of class XI IPA students in senior high school in Gianyar by controlling students’ numeric aptitude. This research used treatment by level 2x2 design and analysis of covariance. The sample was 80 people using multistage random sampling. The results by controlling numeric aptitude are: students learning achievement taught using PAIKEM model is higher than those taught in conventional model. There is an interaction effect between learning model and critical thinking skills toward students’ mathematics achievement. Given high critical thinking skills, students taught using PAIKEM models displayed higher results compared to those in conventional learning who were best in a lower critical thinking skills. Finally, based on the results, it can be recommended to SMA Mathematics teachers to increase students’ Mathematics achievement by using PAIKEM model accurately and to see of students critical thinking skills

ADAPTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MAKE A MATCH DENGAN TALKING STICK UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR IPS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 15 DUMAI

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 248
Author(s):  
Nursian Nursian
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Action Observation ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Mastery Level ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Improve Student Learning ◽  
Planning Action

This study aims to improve their learning achievement after using the adaptation of the learning model to make a match and talking stick in a Social Sciences subject at SMP Negeri 15 Dumai. This research is collaborative classroom action research with stages of planning, action, observation, and reflection. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 15 Dumai with research subjects of class VIII students with a total of 26 students. The results showed that the adaptation of the learning model make a match and talking stick was able to increase the average student learning, indicated by the fact that in the first cycle the implementation of learning reached 78.08 and in Cycle II it was achieved. 87.31 increase student learning activeness, indicated by the fact that in Cycle I 60.23%, and in cycle II 94.32% and improve student learning achievement, indicated by the fact that in the pre-cycle the percentage of students who attained mastery level was 34, 62% (9 students) and students who did not reach the mastery level were 65.38% (17 students); in the first cycle the percentage of students who reached the mastery level was 73.08% (19 students) and students who did not reach the mastery level were 26.92% (7 students); in Cycle II the percentage of students who reached the mastery level was 88.46% (23 students) and students who did not reach the mastery level were 11.54% (3 students). Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the adaptation of the learning model make a match and talking stick is able to improve the learning achievement of social subjects in class VIII students at SMP Negeri 15 Dumai.

scholarly journals Pembandingan Model Pembelajaran Mind Mapping dan Arias (Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Fisika

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-216
Author(s):  
Yeni Rafika ◽  
Welly Anggraini ◽  
Rifda El Fiah
Keyword(s):  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sampling Techniques ◽  
Mind Mapping ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Group Design ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
The Mind ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Interest Assessment

Abstract: This study aims to compare the Mind Mapping and ARIAS learning models (Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction) to the understanding of physics concepts in class VIII students at SMP Negeri 1 Bukit Kemuning. This study is a Quasi Experiment Design with research villages using the Pretest-Posttest Design Control Group. The selection of samples using Purposive Sampling techniques. The research samples were experimental class I (VIII 4) which applied the Mind Mapping learning model and experimental class II (VIII 6) which applied the ARIAS learning model (Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction). Data collection instruments used were test instruments for understanding concepts (pretest and posttest) with essay questions. Based on the research results that have been calculated by the t-test with a significant level of α = 0.05 (5%) that tcount = 1.725 and ttable = 1.708 which indicates that tcount> ttable, to obtain conclusions Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected which means there is a comparison of models Mind Mapping and ARIAS on understanding the concepts of physics of students in SMP Negeri 1 Bukit KemuningAbstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping dan ARIAS(Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction) terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika pada peserta didik kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 1 Bukit Kemuning. Penelitian ini merupakan Quasi EksperimentDesign dengan desain penelitian menggunakan Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Pemilihan sampel menggunakan teknik Sampling Purposive. Sampel penelitian yakni kelas eksperimen I (VIII 4) yang diterapkan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping dan kelas eksperimen II (VIII 6) yang diterapkan  model pembelajaran ARIAS(Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction). Instrumen pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu instrumen tes untuk pemahaman konsep (pretest dan posttest) dengan bentuk soal essai. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dihitung dengan uji-t dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 (5%) bahwa thitung = 1,725 dan ttabel = 1,708 yang menunjukkan bahwa thitung> ttabel , sehingga diperoleh kesimpulan Ha diterima dan H0 ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbandingan model Mind Mapping dan ARIAS terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik di SMP Negeri 1 Bukit Kemuning

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document