scholarly journals Pembandingan Model Pembelajaran Mind Mapping dan Arias (Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction) Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Fisika

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 210-216
Author(s):  
Yeni Rafika ◽  
Welly Anggraini ◽  
Rifda El Fiah

Abstract: This study aims to compare the Mind Mapping and ARIAS learning models (Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction) to the understanding of physics concepts in class VIII students at SMP Negeri 1 Bukit Kemuning. This study is a Quasi Experiment Design with research villages using the Pretest-Posttest Design Control Group. The selection of samples using Purposive Sampling techniques. The research samples were experimental class I (VIII 4) which applied the Mind Mapping learning model and experimental class II (VIII 6) which applied the ARIAS learning model (Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction). Data collection instruments used were test instruments for understanding concepts (pretest and posttest) with essay questions. Based on the research results that have been calculated by the t-test with a significant level of α = 0.05 (5%) that tcount = 1.725 and ttable = 1.708 which indicates that tcount> ttable, to obtain conclusions Ha is accepted and H0 is rejected which means there is a comparison of models Mind Mapping and ARIAS on understanding the concepts of physics of students in SMP Negeri 1 Bukit KemuningAbstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping dan ARIAS(Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction) terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika pada peserta didik kelas VIII di SMP Negeri 1 Bukit Kemuning. Penelitian ini merupakan Quasi EksperimentDesign dengan desain penelitian menggunakan Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Pemilihan sampel menggunakan teknik Sampling Purposive. Sampel penelitian yakni kelas eksperimen I (VIII 4) yang diterapkan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping dan kelas eksperimen II (VIII 6) yang diterapkan  model pembelajaran ARIAS(Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction). Instrumen pengumpulan data yang digunakan yaitu instrumen tes untuk pemahaman konsep (pretest dan posttest) dengan bentuk soal essai. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dihitung dengan uji-t dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 (5%) bahwa thitung = 1,725 dan ttabel = 1,708 yang menunjukkan bahwa thitung> ttabel , sehingga diperoleh kesimpulan Ha diterima dan H0 ditolak yang artinya terdapat perbandingan model Mind Mapping dan ARIAS terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika peserta didik di SMP Negeri 1 Bukit Kemuning

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Muhamad Epi Rusdin ◽  
Widodo Widodo ◽  
Guntur Maruto

The STAD cooperative learning model can support active, independent and responsible learning for students. The application of this model is expected to improve students' critical thinking skills. The purpose of this study was to determine the improvement of students' critical thinking skills using Edmodo-assisted learning models. Edmodo was modified to become a teacher tool to expand learning at home. This research is an experimental study using a pretest-posttest control group design involving 39 students of class VIII MTs At-Taqwa Beru, Sikka, East Nusa Tenggara. Based on the results of the study it was found that the Edmodo-assisted STAD type cooperative learning model can improve students' critical thinking skills.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 87
Author(s):  
Akbar Riyadi ◽  
Gunawan Gunawan ◽  
Jannatin Ardhuha

This research is a quasy experiment which aimed to finding out the effect of contextual learning model implementation assisted by media flash on the understanding concept of physics in SMPN 1 Labuapi. The population is all class VIII which filled by 117 students, while the sample of this research is class VIII B with 23 students as experiment group and grade VIII C with 23 students as control group. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling. The research design used is nonequivalent control group design. The hypothesis is tested by t-test separated varians. Based on by calculation hypothesis testing obtained that there is a difference of understanding concept of physics between experiment group which is given treatment with contextual learning model assisted by media flash and control group which is given treatment as convensional learning. The mean of the posttest for experiment group is greater than control group, so it can be obtained that contextual learning model assisted by media flash given positive result for understanding concept of physics in grade VIII SMPN 1 Labuapi. N-gain test given that for all of sub materi of light showed that the increasing of understanding concept of physics of class experiment is higher than control class, so it can be obtained that the increasing of understanding concept of physics of experiment group is higher than control group.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 218
Author(s):  
Mugi Rahayu ◽  
I Komang Sudarma ◽  
I Ketut Dibia

The implementation of this research is based on the problems found at the time of observation, namely the difficulty of students learning, especially in science learning that has an impact on student learning outcomes and learning that is still teacher-centered that causes students to be passive. Based on these problems, this study aims to improve the learning outcomes of science students in grade V elementary school. This type of research is a quasi-experimental design with Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The research design used is the post-test only control group design. The population in this study amounted to 147 students consisting of four classes. The determination of the sample is done by random sampling in the form of a draw. The number of samples was 72 students, namely the experimental class totaling 36 students and the control class totaling 36 students. The students' natural science post-test data collection is done by using multiple-choice objective test methods. Then, the t-test formula was analyzed. From the results of the analysis, it was shown that t-count = 3,920 was obtained and compared with t-table at the 5% significance level and dk = 36 + 36-2 = 70 so that the price of t-table = 1.99444 was obtained. Based on these results, there are significant differences in science learning outcomes between the classes given the treatment of the TSTS learning model aided by the mind mapping method and the classes given the treatment of conventional learning models. The results of the calculations obtained the experimental class has a higher mean than the control class, which is 79.06>68.75. Based on this, the TSTS learning model is assisted by an effective mind mapping method to the science learning outcomes of fifth-grade students of elementary school.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
Rismawati Rismawati ◽  
Murhami Murhami

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan hasil belajar siswa dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran tutor sebaya lebih tinggi dari pada pembelajaran konvensional  pada materi statistika pada siswa kelas VIII di salah satu SMP Negeri di Susoh, Aceh, Indonesia. Jenis penelitian ini adalah true eksperimen design dengan Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Proses pembelajaran pada kelompok eksperimen dengan menerapkan model pembelajaran tutor sebaya dan kelompok kontrol dengan menerapkan pembelajaran konvensional. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII di salah satu SMP Negeri di Susoh yang berjumlah 62 orang siswa, sedangkan jumlah sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah 41 orang yaitu kelas eksperiment 20 siswa dan kelas control 21 siswa. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian eksperiment dengan design pretest-posttest. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes yang dilakukan pada kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol, sedang teknik analisis data digunakan adalah menggunakan uji non parametris Mann-Whitney U-Test. Dari hasil uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai < , (-4,88 < 1,645), maka ditolak dan  diterima. Sehingga dapat diambil kesimpulan bahwa “Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran tutor sebaya lebih tinggi dari pada pembelajaran konvesional pada materi statistika kelas VIII di salah satu SMP Negeri di Susoh”. Kata Kunci :Hasil Belajar, Statistika, Model Pembelajaran Tutor Sebaya This research is intended to see the students learning improvement by implementing peer tutorial at the VIII grade student at one of Junior High School in Susoh, Aceh, Indonesia. This research was a true experimental design with Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The learning process in the experimental group was by applying the peer tutoring learning model and the control group was by applying conventional learning. The population in this study was all students of class VIII with the total number 62 students, while the number of samples in this study was 41 students, 20 students in experimental class and 21 student in control class. Tests were used to collect the data, to analyze the data, the researchers used the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-Test. The finding of the hypothesis showed that Z count < Z table (-4 , 88 <1,645), was rejected and  was accepted. Therefore it can be concluded that the implementation of peer tutoring learning models is higher than conventional learning at class VIII Junior High Schools, Susoh. Keywords : Learning Outcomes , Statistics, Peer Tutor Learning Model


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Arilda Setiya Ningrum ◽  
Nur Lestari ◽  
Kusmiyati Kusmiyati

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar IPA Biologi pada siswa kelas VII menggunakan model pembelajaran tipe Team Asissted Indovidualization (TAI) dengan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping di SMPN 19 Mataram tahun ajaran 2017/2018. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian komparatif. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah pretest-postest non-control group design. Populasinya adalah seluruh kelas VII SMP Negeri 19 Mataram. Penentuan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik simple random sampling dan diperoleh kelas VII C sebagai kelas eksperimen I dan kelas VII D sebagai kelas eksperimen II. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengukur hasil belajar adalah tes objektif dan tes subjektif untuk hasil belajar kognitif, lembar observasi siswa untuk hasil belajar afektif dan psikomotorik. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan uji-t polled varians dengan taraf signifikansi 5%. Data yang diuji dengan uji-t adalah data gain score. Hasil uji-t untuk data hasil belajar kognitif didapatkan bahwa thitung > ttabel yakni 2,16 > 1,99. Hasil analisis data menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar siswa menggunakan model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) dengan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping di SMP Negeri 19 Mataram tahun ajaran 2017/2018. This research aimed to determine the difference of science biology learning outcomes in VII grade students through the application of Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model with Mind Mapping learning model at SMPN 19 Mataram academic year 2017/2018. The type of research was a comparative research. Pretest-posttest non-control group design was used as the design of this research. The population is the entire class VII SMP Negeri 19 Mataram. Samples were determined by simple random sampling technique that has chosen VII C as experiment class I and VII D as experiment class II. Objective and subjective tests were used to measure student achievement for cognitive student achievement, student observation sheets for effective and psychomotor student achievement. The data obtained were analyzed by t-test polled variance with a significance level of 5 %. The data tested by the t-test is the gain score data. Result of t-test for cognitive learning has found tcount  >  ttable that 2,16 > 1,99. The data analysis showed a difference in student learning result using TAI learning model with Mind Mapping learning model at SMP Negeri 19 Mataram academic year 2017/2018.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irwandani Irwandani

This study aims to find and describe how much influence of generative learning models in class VIII students MTs Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung. The research method used quasi experiment with  Pretest-Posttest Control Group design. The research sample is divided into two classes, namely experimental and control class. The learning in experimental class uses a generative learning model while the control class uses the conventional learning model. Based on the result of the research, it can be concluded that the understanding of learners concept using generative learning model is higher compared with the understanding of learners concept using conventional learning model. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan men­deskripsikan seberapa besar pengaruh model pembelajaran generatif pada peserta didik kelas VIII MTs Al-Hikmah Bandar Lampung. Metode penelitian menggunakan kuasi eksperimen dengan desain Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Sampel penelitian terbagi dalam dua kelas, yaitu kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Kelas eksperimen menggunakan pembelajaran dengan model pembelajaran generatif sementara kelas kontrol menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa pemahaman konsep peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran generatif lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan pemahaman konsep peserta didik yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 274
Author(s):  
Hani Wardah Latipah ◽  
Adman Adman

The Problem in this research is about the low of student learning outcomes of learners on the basic competence to identifying facilities and office environment in class X of Office Administration Program in SMK Negeri 3 Bandung. It was shown from the daily test score that are still under Minimum Mastery Criteria.The objective of this research is to measure students learning outcomes, using Mind Mapping model and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model so that it can be known which learning model improves learners' learning outcomes. It can be seen by the improvement of learning outcomes after the treatment which is analyzed based on N-Gain.The method used in this research is quasi experimental method and used the Nonequivalent Control Group Design.. The research subject were grade X of Office Administration program namely X Office Administration 1 as the experimental class and X Office Administration 4 as the control class.The results shows that the learners' learning outcomes are equivalent. The evidence is from the N-Gain results in the experimental class of 0.646 and the control class of 0.582 in the medium category. Based on normalized N-Gain and hypothesis test using different test (t-Test) proven that tcount < ttable is 1.236251286 <1.666293697. Hence, it can be concluded that there is no significant difference between using Mind Mapping learning model with the model of learning Numbered Head Together (NHT).Permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini adalah rendahnnya hasil belajar peserta didik pada kompetensi dasar mengidentifikasikan fasilitas dan lingkungan kantor di kelas X program keahlian Administrasi Perkantoran SMKN 3 Bandung yang terlihat dari nilai ulangan harian yang masih dibawah KKM.Tujuan dilaksanakannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengukur hasil belajar peserta didik, dengan menggunakan model Mind Mapping dan model Numbered Head Together (NHT) sehingga dapat diketahui manakah model pembelajaran yang meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik. Hal ini dilihat dari peningkatan hasil pembelajaran setelah dilakukan treatment yang dianalisis berdasarkan N-Gain.Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen semu (quasi experiment) dengan desain Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Subjek penelitian ini yaitu kelas XAP1 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan XAP4 sebagai kelas kontrol.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hasil belajar peserta didik setara. Hal ini terbukti dari hasil N-Gain pada kelas eksperimen sebesar 0.646 dan pada kelas kontrol sebesar 0.582 yang berada pada kategori sedang. Berdasarkan N-Gain ternormalisasi dan uji hipotesis menggunakan uji beda (t-Test) yang terbukti bahwa thitung < ttabel yaitu 1.236251286 < 1.666293697. Sehingga, dapat disimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Mind Mapping dengan model pembelajaran Numbered Head Together (NHT). 


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 229
Author(s):  
NI NYOMAN LEMES SUCIASIH . ◽  
Luh Putu Putrini Mahadewi, S.Pd., M.S. . ◽  
Dr. Putu Aditya Antara, S.Pd., M.Pd. .

Permasalahan pada penelitian ini adalah perkembangan kognitif khususnya kemampuan sains permulaan anak belum berkembang secara optimal, dengan kegiatan pembelajaran yang cenderung menggunakan media gambar atau lembar kerja yang seadanya saja Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian menggunakan post-test only control group design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh anak kelompok A gugus VIII Kecamatan Buleleng yang berjumlah 121 anak. Teknik penentuan sampel dalam penelitian ini menggunakan teknik simple random sampling. Sampel penelitian ini adalah anak-anak kelompok A TK Shinta Kumara yang berjumlah 15 anak, sebagai kelompok eksperimen yang diberikan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Double Loop Problem Solving (DLPS). Anak-anak kelompok A TK Dewi Kumara yang berjumlah 15 anak sebagai kelompok kontrol yang diberikan pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Data hasil kemampuan sains permulaana anak dikumpulkan dengan teknik observasi dan dokumentasi, yang dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis uji-t. Berdasarkan hasil analisis diperoleh thitung adalah 8,135 dan ttabel dengan taraf signifikan 5% dengan (db) 28 adalah 2,048 dengan demikian thitung 8,135 > ttabel 2,048. Berdasarkan kriteria pengujian, maka H1 diterima yaitu terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan kemampuan sains permulaan antara anak yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model pembelajaran Double Loop Problem Solving (DLPS) dengan anak yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Adapun nilai rata-rata anak kelompok yang diberikan model pembelajaran DLPS yaitu 31,13 lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan kelompok anak yang menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional yaitu 22,67.Kata Kunci : Kata Kunci: Double Loop Problem Solving, Sains Permulaan The problem in this research is the cognitive development, especially the ability of the early childhood science has not developed optimally, with learning activities that tend to use a picture media or a one-of-a-kind worksheet. This type of research is quasi experiment with research techniques using post-test only control group design. The population of this study is all children Kelompok A di Gugus VIII Kecamatan Buleleng amounting to 121 children. The sampling techniques in this study used cluster sampling techniques. These research samples are children kelompok A TK Shinta Kumara which amounted to 15 children, as an experimental group given learning by using the Double Loop Problem Solving (DLPS) learning model. And the children of the Kelompok A TK Dewi Kumara which amounted to 15 children as a control group given learning by using conventional learning models. Data on the results of the child's beginning science is collected with observation and documentation techniques, which are analyzed using one way anava analysis techniques. Based on the results of analysis obtained thitung is 4.572 and this with a significant level of 5% with (db) 28 is 2.048 thus thitung 4.572 > this 2.048 ttabel. Based on the test criteria, the H1 is accepted that there is a significant difference of initial science ability between children who are taught using the Double Loop Problem Solving (DLPS) learning model with children using models Conventional learning. The average value of the child group is given a DLPS learning model that is 31.13 higher than that of the child group who use conventional learning model is 22.67.keyword : Keywords: Double Loop Problem Solving, Early Science


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rabithah Hasibuan ◽  
Bornok Sinaga

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran Discovery Learning di kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain pretest-posttest Control Group Design. Variabel penelitian ini terdiri dari variabel bebas yaitu penggunaan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan Dicovery Learning, sedangkan variabel terikat yaitu kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan yang terdiri dari 8 kelas, sedangkan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII-G (kelas eksperimen I) sebanyak 31 orang dan kelas VIII-H (kelas eksperimen II) sebanyak 31 orang. Instrumen penelitian dalam pengumpulan data adalah tes dan lembar observasi. Sebelum pengujian hipotesis terlebih dahulu diuji normalitas data dengan menggunakan uji Liliefors dan homogenitas data menggunakan uji F. Dari pengujian yang dilakukan diperoleh bahwa hasil pretest kedua sampel berdistribusi normal dan homogen, dengan demikian penulis bisa memberikan perlakuan kepada kedua sampel. Dari hasil analisis data pretest-posttes dengan menggunakan uji-t pada taraf α = 0,05 diperoleh thitung > ttabel yaitu 1,955 > 1,677sehingga H0 ditolak dan Ha diterima. Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran Discovery Learning di kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan. Kata kunci : Kemampuan pemecahan masalah, , model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning dan Discovery Learning.AbstractThis study aims to determine the problem solving ability of mathematics students using Problem Based Learning model of learning is better than the model of learning Discovery Learning in class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan. This research is a quasi-experimental research with pretest-posttest Control Group Design design. The variables of this study consisted of independent variables, namely the use of Problem Based Learning and Dicovery Learning, while the dependent variable is the students' math problem solving abilities. The population in this study is all students of class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan consisting of 8 classes, while the sample in this study were students of class VIII-G (experiment class I) as many as 31 people and class VIII-H (Experiment class II) as many as 31 people. Research instruments in data collection are test and observation sheet. Before testing the hypothesis first tested the normality of data by using Liliefors test and homogeneity of data using F test. From the test it was obtained that the pretest results of both samples distributed normal and homogeneous, thus the authors can provide treatment to both samples. From result of analysis of pretest-posttes data by using t-test at α = 0,05 obtained t count> ttable that is 1,955> 1,677 so that H0 refused and Ha accepted. Then it can be concluded that the problem solving ability of mathematics students using Problem Based Learning model is better than Discovery Learning model in class VIII SMP Negeri 1 Percut Sei Tuan. Keywords: Problem solving abilities, Problem Based Learning and Discovery Learning   model


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-261
Author(s):  
Nanda Febriyanti ◽  
Widya Wati

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Pictorial Riddle learning model on Physics students learning outcomes of class VIII SMPN1 Seputih Agung on the vibration and waves material. The research method used was a quasi exsperiment design with nonequivalent control group design. The survey result revealed that the normality test of the experimental class Lcount = 0,1557 and class control Lcount = 0,1211 Ltable = 0,172. Terms of normality test Lcount < Ltable then normality distributed data. To test the homogeneity of Fcount < Ftable = 1,0064 < 1,69 then the data homogeneous. Test Hypotheses obtained tcount > ttable = 4,83 > 2,01 means that there are significant Pictorial Riddle learning model to the outcomes of students subject matter Physics vibration and waves in class VIII SMPN1 Seputih Agung.   Abstrak:Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui model Pictorial Riddle terhadap hasil belajar kognitif fisika siswa kelas VIII SMPN1 Seputih Agung pada materi getaran dan gelombang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi exsperiment design dengan desain nonequivalent control group design. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa uji normalitas pada kelas eksperimen Lhitung = 0,1557 dan kelas kontrol Lhitung =0,1211 sedangkan Ltabel = 0,172. Syarat uji normalitas Lhitung < Ltabel maka data tersebut terdistribusi normal. Untuk uji homogenitas Fhitung < Ftabel = 1,0064 < 1,69  maka data homogen. Uji hipotesis didapatkan thitung > ttabel = 4,83 > 2,01 artinya, terdapat pengaruh signifikan pembelajaran Pictorial Riddle terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik kelas VIII SMPN1 Seputih Agung pada pokok bahasan getaran dan gelombang


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document