The effect of foot reflexology on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in digestive or lung cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Murat-Ringot ◽  
Pierre Jean Souquet ◽  
Fabien Subtil ◽  
Florent Boutitie ◽  
Marie Preau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Digestive Cancer ◽  
Complementary Medicines ◽  
Antiemetic Drugs ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Delayed Nausea

BACKGROUND Cancer is a chronic disease with an incident worldwide had been 24.5 million and 9.6 million deaths in 2017. Lung and colorectal cancer are the most common cancer for both sexes and according to national and international recommendations platinum-based chemotherapy is the reference adjuvant treatment. This chemotherapy can be moderately to highly emetogenic. Despite antiemetic therapy, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting may persist. Moreover, cancer patient are increasingly interested in alternative and complementary medicines and express the desire that non-pharmacological treatments be used in hospitals. Among alternative and complementary medicines, foot reflexology decreases significantly the severity of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients. OBJECTIVE The primary objective of the present study was to assess the benefits of foot reflexology as a complement to conventional treatments on severity of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in digestive or lung cancer patients. The secondary objectives assessed were the frequency and severity of delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, quality of life, anxiety, and self-esteem. METHODS The present study was conducted between April 2018 and April 2020 in French University Hospital. This is an open-label randomized controlled trial. Participants are randomized into two groups: 40 to interventional group (conventional care with foot reflexology) and 40 to control group (conventional care without foot reflexology). Foot reflexology sessions (30 minutes) are performed on an outpatient or inpatient. Eligible participants are patients with a lung or digestive cancer with indication for platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS The severity of acute nausea and vomiting was assessed with a visual analogue scale during the second cycle of chemotherapy. A significant increase of at least 2 points was observed for control group (20.6%, P = 0.01). Across all cycle, the foot reflexology group showed a trend towards less frequent delayed nausea (P=0.28), a significantly less frequent consumption of antiemetic drugs (P=0.04), and no significant difference for vomiting (P=0.99); there was a trend towards a perception of stronger severity for delayed nausea in the control group (P=0.39). According to quality of life and anxiety, there was no significant difference between the interventional group and the control group (P=0.32 and P=0.53 respectively). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the present study results indicated that foot reflexology decreased significantly the severity of acute nausea and consumption of antiemetic drugs in lung and digestive cancer patients. No side effects from foot reflexology have been noted. In order to better respond to a desire of patients for non-pharmacological treatments and CAMs to be used in hospitals to improve their care, the results of this study showed that foot reflexology seems to be a promising complement to conventional antiemetic drugs. To assess the performance of this intervention in routine practice, a larger study with several health care centers would be relevant with a cluster RCT. CLINICALTRIAL The present study registered with clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03508180 (28/06/2018) INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/17232

scholarly journals Effect of ginger tea on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among cancer patients in selected hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Odisha

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1165-1171
Author(s):  
Sasmita Das ◽  
Mary Preety Banra ◽  
Neethu Maria Joseph
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Research Design ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Food Component ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Analysis ◽  
And Control

A quasi-experimental research study (posttest only research design) was conducted to evaluate the effect of ginger tea on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among cancer patients in selected hospitals of Bhubaneswar and to find out the association of level of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with selected socio-demographic variables. For this study, a quantitative experimental approach and post-test only research design was adopted. 100 patients were selected by convenience sampling technique and categorized into experimental (n=50) and control group (n=50) for this study. Self- structured socio-demographic proforma and self- structured record analysis proforma was used to collect socio-demographic data and modified nausea and vomiting scale was used to measure the level of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among cancer patients. The data was analyzed by using SPSS version 20.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Science). The post-testt level of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among experimental and control groups was compared by unpaired‘t’ test and the result showed (p=<0.0001) significant difference between both groups. The chi-square analysis shows a statistically significance association between chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and the emetogenic potential of the drug in both groups and in control group age was also significance associated. The ANOVA test revealed the statistically significance of the posttest level of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting within groups of the emetogenic potential of a drug. The present study concluded that the food component, like ginger tea, is an effective home remedy for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among cancer patients. Further study can be conducted with a large population, different dose and compositions of ginger and with different adjuvant therapy to manage nausea and vomiting among cancer patients.

scholarly journals The addition of omeprazole to ondansetron for treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Perjuangan Dapot Hamonangan Simbolon ◽  
Selvi Nafianti ◽  
Pertin Sianturi ◽  
Bidasari Lubis ◽  
Aznan Lelo
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients

Background Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are some of the most disturbing side effects in pediatric cancer patients. The standard recommendation is the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist, such as ondansetron, to treat these symptoms. Despite this treatment, more than 50% of patients still experience nausea and vomiting.Objective To evaluate the effect of the addition of omeprazole to ondansetron in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Methods A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at Haji Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, North Sumatera, from March to May 2016. Subjects were children aged 1 to 18 years, diagnosed with cancer, and who received intravenous chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either a single dose of ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg) plus placebo or ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg) plus omeprazole (0.5 mg/kg). The severity of nausea and vomiting were measured using the Rhodes index of nausea, vomiting, and retching during the 24 hours after initiation of emetogenic chemotherapy. The primary outcome of efficacy was the proportion of patients who achieved complete response (lack of nausea/vomiting). Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square and Fischer’s exact tests.Results Seventy eligible pediatric patients were randomized into two groups: 32 subjects in the ondansetron + placebo group and 38 others in the ondansetron + omeprazole group. The therapy failed in 50% (16/32) of the ondansetron + placebo group and 18.4% (7/38) of the ondansetron + omeprazole group. There was a significant difference in the clinical response between groups (P=0.01).Conclusion The addition of omeprazole to ondansetron for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is more effective than administration of ondansetron alone.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of yoga on anxiety, depression and stress level of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Kamli Prakash ◽  
Sunil Saini
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stress Level ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anxiety Depression ◽  
Experimental Group

Background: Breast cancer has ranked number one cancer among Indian females. Women undergoing chemotherapy experience many side effects including alteration in their body image. The present study assessed effectiveness of yoga on anxiety, depression and stress level of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Methods: Quantitative Research approach and Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial with Time series design was adopted in the present study. The consecutive sampling technique was done to recruit 100 breast cancer patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Recruited patients were randomized to control (N=52) and experiment (N=48) groups by concealed randomization. Written informed consent was taken from each participant. Baseline data was collected during cycle one by using Anxiety depression and stress scale. The patients in the experimental group were taught Diaphragmatic breathing, systematic relaxation and alternate nostril breathing and Joints and Gland neck and shoulder exercises, and were instructed to practice them twice daily at home. They were supervised in practicing these when they received second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth cycles of chemotherapy. Participants in control group received routine care. Data was again collected after 21 days during second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth cycles of chemotherapy.Results: Analysis revealed that at the baseline breast cancer patients in control and experimental group were homogenous in terms of their Sociodemographic and anxiety depression and stress scores. After the yoga intervention the experimental group showed statistically significant difference in anxiety scores from control group during second, third and sixth cycles (p 0.01, p 0.02, p 0.02), in depression score during the second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth cycles (p 0.02, p 0.02, p 0.02, p 0.001, p 0.000), and in stress scores during third cycle (p 0.01) of chemotherapy.Conclusions: On the basis of findings of the study it was concluded that yoga was effective in reducing the anxiety, depression and stress of breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Therefore, it is recommended as complementary therapy for patients receiving treatment for cancer. 

scholarly journals Is Infusion of Subhypnotic Propofol as Effective as Dexamethasone in Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Related to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Randomized Controlled Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mine Celik ◽  
Aysenur Dostbil ◽  
Mehmet Aksoy ◽  
Ilker Ince ◽  
Ali Ahiskalioglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group D

Background. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of common complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of subhypnotic (1 mg/kg/h) infusion of propofol with dexamethasone on PONV in patients undergoing LC.Methods. A total of 120 patients were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups; patients of group dexamethasone (group D) were administrated 8 mg dexamethasone before induction of anesthesia, patients of group propofol (group P) were infused to subhypnotic (1 mg/kg/h) propofol during operation and patients of group control (group C) were applied infusion of 10% intralipid. The incidence of PONV and needs for rescue analgesic and antiemetic were recorded in the first 24 h postoperatively.Results. In the 0–24 h, the incidence of PONV was significantly lower in the group D and group P compared with the group C (37.5%, 40%, and 72.5%, resp.). There was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV and use of antiemetics and analgesic between group D and group P.Conclusion. We concluded that infusion of propofol 1 mg/kg/h is as effective as dexamethasone for the prevention of PONV during the first 24 hours after anesthesia in patients undergoing LC.

Prevention of cisplatin nephrotoxicity (CN) in head and neck cancer patients receiving concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) by adding oral rehydration solution (ORS) to short hydration regimen: A randomized open-label controlled trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18560-e18560
Author(s):  
Aungsumal Maisrikrod ◽  
Siwat Sakdejayont ◽  
Jakkapan Rongmuang ◽  
Chirawadee Sathitruangsak ◽  
Patrapim Sunpaweravong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Total Fluid Intake ◽  
Significant Difference

e18560 Background: CN remains a frequent occurrence despite receiving standard fluid hydration, particularly for head and neck cancer patients undergoing CCRT. We aimed to investigate whether adding ORS to short hydration regimen can reduce CN. Methods: We conducted a randomized open-label controlled trial in patients with head and neck cancer receiving CCRT with 3-weekly cisplatin (≥ 60 mg/m²). Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive short hydration regimen (2000 mL of normal saline on day 1) alone or in combination with 2000 mL of ORS on days -1, 2 and 3 of each cycle. All patients were instructed to drink at least 2000 mL of fluid. The primary end point was the incidence of ≥ gr 1 creatinine (Cr) elevation on day 8. The planned sample size was 160 (80 patients each arm). Results: Thirty-five patients in ORS group and 34 patients in control group (43% of planned sample size) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups, except more patients in ORS group underwent surgery (35.3% vs. 22.9%), and had less feeding tube prophylaxis (76.5% vs. 88.6%), although there were not statistically significant. The mean dose of cisplatin on day 1 was significantly higher in ORS group (91.2 mg/m2 vs. 85.1 mg/m2, p=0.01). There was no difference of volume of total fluid intake and toxicities between the two groups. Less percentage of patients in ORS group developed ≥ gr 1 Cr elevation as shown in the Table, although there were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Although our interim analysis showed no significant difference of CN between the groups, there was a trend that addition of ORS might prevent acute and chronic kidney injury secondary to cisplatin. The completed enrollment is warranted to confirm this early findings. Clinical trial information: TCTR20200207005 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Effects of Aromatherapy with Lavender and Peppermint Essential Oils on the Sleep Quality of Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahar Hamzeh ◽  
Roya Safari-Faramani ◽  
Alireza Khatony
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Essential Oils ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
And Control

One of the problems of cancer patients is sleep disorder. Given the absence of studies on comparing the effect of inhalation aromatherapy with lavender and peppermint on the sleep quality of the cancer patients, this study was performed to compare the effect of inhalation aromatherapy with lavender and peppermint essential oils on the sleep quality of cancer patients. For this purpose, 120 patients were randomly allocated to three groups of lavender, peppermint, and control. The intervention groups received three drops of the essential oil for 7 days. In the control group, aromatic distilled water was used instead. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI) was used. Before the intervention, no significant difference was observed between the mean PSQI scores of three groups, while the difference was statistically significant after the intervention. The mean PSQI scores were lower in lavender and peppermint groups than in the control group. Aromatherapy can improve the sleep quality of cancer patients. To confirm the findings, more studies should be done.

scholarly journals OLANZAPINE COMBINED WITH STANDARD ANTIEMETIC REGIMENS FOR PREVENTION OF CHEMOTHERAPY THERAPY-INDUCED NAUSEA AND VOMITING: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE FROM SOUTH INDIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel James ◽  
Drisya Pm ◽  
Wesely M Jose
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Antipsychotic Agent ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Delayed Nausea

  Objectives: Olanzapine, an antipsychotic agent, exhibits significant antiemetic properties due to its inhibitory activity on neurotransmitters at multiple receptors involved in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). CINV can have an immensely negative impact on patient’s quality of life (QOL) and daily activities. Our objectives were to determine the effectiveness of adding olanzapine to standard antiemetic regimens for the prevention of CINV in cancer patients and to compare the QOL of such patients with those receiving standard antiemetic regimens.Methods: A prospective, observational, cohort study was done on patients receiving either highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). The patients who received only the standard antiemetic regimens were considered as the control group and those who received 10 mg of olanzapine once daily on days 1-5 of chemotherapy in addition to the standard antiemetic regimens were considered to be the study group. The patients were assessed for grades of nausea and vomiting using National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events and for QOL using European Organization in Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL questionnaire.Results: Patients were evaluated for a total of 168 cycles of chemotherapy. Compared to the control group, the study group patients showed significant improvement in response to acute nausea (p=0.02) but not in acute vomiting (p=0.09). However, response to delayed nausea and vomiting improved significantly (p=0.004 and p=0.05, respectively). The QOL of study group patients showed significant improvement in functional scales and symptom scales (p<0.02). Global health status also increased significantly (p=0.02) in the study group patients.Conclusion: Olanzapine containing pre-medication regimens can reduce acute and delayed nausea and delayed vomiting and improve the QOL of cancer patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapeutic agents as compared to the standard pre-medication regimens.

scholarly journals The Safety of Early Administration of Oral Fluid Following General Anesthesia in Children Undergoing Tonsil Operation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng-Hang Wu ◽  
Chang-qing Liu ◽  
Xiao-qi Zeng ◽  
An-na Jia ◽  
Xiao-rong Yin
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Oral Fluid ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Early Administration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tonsil Surgery ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Background: The feasibility and safety of giving a small amount of water to children in the recovery period after tonsillectomy under general anesthesia to reduce the thirst and its associated restlessness reaction remain unknown. Methods: This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee, and which adhered to CONSORT guidelines. Pediatric patients undergoing tonsil surgery who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of our study were randomized into the experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, patients were given a small amount of water instantly after recovering from the general anesthesia, which included the recovery of cough and deglutition reflex, and attaining grade V of muscle strength. The control group was given a small amount of water 4 to 6 hours after the operation. The incidence of nausea and vomiting and the degree of thirst relief were measured and compared between the two groups. Results：300 patients were randomized into each group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting 20 minutes after drinking water between the two groups (P>0.05). The thirst score of children over 5 years old in the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The early administration of a small amount of oral fluid in children undergoing tonsil surgery and recovering from the general anesthesia is not only safe but also effective in reducing postoperative thirst. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR1800020058, 12-12-2018.

scholarly journals The addition of omeprazole to ondansetron for treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric cancer patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Perjuangan Dapot Hamonangan Simbolon ◽  
Selvi Nafianti ◽  
Pertin Sianturi ◽  
Bidasari Lubis ◽  
Aznan Lelo
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pediatric Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients

Background Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting are some of the most disturbing side effects in pediatric cancer patients. The standard recommendation is the use of 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist, such as ondansetron, to treat these symptoms. Despite this treatment, more than 50% of patients still experience nausea and vomiting.Objective To evaluate the effect of the addition of omeprazole to ondansetron in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Methods A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at Haji Adam Malik Hospital, Medan, North Sumatera, from March to May 2016. Subjects were children aged 1 to 18 years, diagnosed with cancer, and who received intravenous chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive either a single dose of ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg) plus placebo or ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg) plus omeprazole (0.5 mg/kg). The severity of nausea and vomiting were measured using the Rhodes index of nausea, vomiting, and retching during the 24 hours after initiation of emetogenic chemotherapy. The primary outcome of efficacy was the proportion of patients who achieved complete response (lack of nausea/vomiting). Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square and Fischer’s exact tests.Results Seventy eligible pediatric patients were randomized into two groups: 32 subjects in the ondansetron + placebo group and 38 others in the ondansetron + omeprazole group. The therapy failed in 50% (16/32) of the ondansetron + placebo group and 18.4% (7/38) of the ondansetron + omeprazole group. There was a significant difference in the clinical response between groups (P=0.01).Conclusion The addition of omeprazole to ondansetron for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is more effective than administration of ondansetron alone.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Ginger in Ameliorating Acute and Delayed Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting Among Patients With Lung Cancer Receiving Cisplatin-Based Regimens: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangfeng Li ◽  
Ying Qin ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Xiao-yu Zhou ◽  
Ya-nan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Adherence ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Antiemetic Therapy ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Delayed Nausea

Nausea and vomiting are among the most common and distressing side effects of chemotherapy. Additional antiemetic drugs are urgently needed to effectively manage and ameliorate chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The efficacy of ginger as an antiemetic modality for ameliorating CINV has not been established in previous studies. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of ginger, as an adjuvant drug to standard antiemetic therapy, in ameliorating acute and delayed CINV in patients with lung cancer receiving cisplatin-based regimens. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, 140 patients with lung cancer receiving cisplatin-based regimens were enrolled and allocated to receive either ginger root powder or a placebo. Ginger root powder was administered orally (0.5 g, 2 capsules per day, 0.25 g per capsule, every 12 hours) for 5 days beginning on the first day of chemotherapy. The incidence and severity of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting were assessed using the MASCC (Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer) Antiemesis Tool (MAT). Adverse effects and patient adherence were also assessed in this study. No significant difference was observed between the ginger and control groups in the reduction of the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting ( P > .05). No significant difference in adverse events was observed between the 2 groups ( P > .05). No study-treatment-related adverse events were observed in this study. As an adjuvant drug to standard antiemetic therapy, ginger had no additional efficacy in ameliorating CINV in patients with lung cancer receiving cisplatin-based regimens.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document