scholarly journals THE POSITION OF NOTARIAL DEED IN THE SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTE

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Yulies Tiena Masriani

Today the Indonesian economic system recognizes and applies the principles of Sharia into the National Legal System. Those principles are based on the value of justice, mutuality, equality, benefit and universalism (rahmatan lil ‘alamin), particular in agreement (Akad). An Akad is laid down into an notary deed, the the parties are deemed to have agreed its contents and consequences. If one of the parties does not perform his obligation, there can emerge a dispute in the implementation of Sharia economic transactions. Therefore, the position of a notary deed is very important as an evidence in the dispute settlement. Saat ini sistem ekonomi Indonesia mengakui dan menerapkan prinsip-prinsipnya Syariah ke dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Prinsip Syariah berlandaskan pada nilai nilai keadilan, kebersamaan, pemerataan, kemanfaatan dan keuniversalan (rahmatan lil ‘alamin) khususnya Akad. Akad dituangkan dalam suatu akta notariil, maka para pihak dianggap telah menyetujui semua isi Akad dan konsekuensinya. Para pihak harus melaksanakan hak dan kewajibannya sesuai dengan isi akta tersebut. Apabila salah satu pihak tidak melaksanakan Akad tersebut, maka menimbulkan terjadinya sengketa dalam pelaksanaan transaksi ekonomi syariah. Oleh sebab itu, kedudukan akta notariil sangat penting sebagai alat bukti dalam penyelesain sengketa tersebut.


1972 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Roberts

In almost all the former British African territories the colonial power tried to make use of the traditional dispute settlement agencies which it found on arrival. The history of these efforts is familiar, following a generally similar course in most territories. The arrangements made in the early years were haphazard; a good deal of formalization took place around 1930; more profound changes were initiated in the early 1960's and have continued since. But the familiar legislative history yields little information about what has been happening on the ground. We know very little of the way in which the traditional agencies drawn into the official system actually reacted towards this process of incorporation. Leaving aside what the statute may have said, have they remained the agencies to which Africans actually resorted for the settlement of their disputes? Has the type of business coming before them changed? Similarly we know little about those agencies, typically at the lower levels, which did not undergo incorporation. Have they continued to function, or have they simply died away?



2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Agus Saiful Abib

<p>Indonesia adalah negara hukum (<em>rechtsstaat</em>), oleh karena itu hukum nasional harus berdaulat dan menjadi panglima dalam menyelesaiaikan seluruh permasalahan bangsa. Akan tetapi penyelesaian perselisihan antara negara dengan warga negara asing mengenai penanaman modal dalam hegemoni hukum arbitrase internasinal, dimana pemerintah menyerahkan mekanismenya kepada <em>International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputte</em> (ICSID). Fokus permasalahan makalah ini adalah Bagaimanakah keuntungan dan kerugian pemerintah Indonesia dalam penyelesian perselisihan antara negara dengan warganegara asing mengenai penanaman modal melalui ICSID? Bagaimanakah konsep penyelesian perselisihan antara negara dengan warga negara asing mengenai penanaman modal dalam sistem hukum nasional berbasis Pancasila. Metode yang digunakan dalam makalah ini adalah Analisa kualitatif dengan menggunakan paradigma postpositivisme (Guba &amp; Lincoln) yang disinergikan dengan pendekatan sosiolegal. Penulisan makalah ini mengungkapkan Hukum nasional merupakan hukum yang dibangun oleh bangsa Indonesia sendiri berdasarkan nilai ketuhanan, nilai kemanusiaan dan nilai kemasyarakatan yang merupakan nilai agung Pancasila sebagai pandangan hidup bangsa Indonesia guna mewujudkan tujuan negara. Indonesia mengalami kerugian sangat besar ketika penyelesaian perselisihan antara negara dengan warganegara asing mengenai penanaman modal diserahkan kepada ICSID, Oleh karena itu, perselisihan penanaman modal sebaiknya diselesaikan oleh badan arbitrase ASEAN.</p><p>Indonesia is a state of law (rechtsstaat), therefore the national law must be sovereign and be the commander in solving all the problems of the nation. However, the settlement of disputes between the state and foreign citizens concerning investment in the hegemony of the international arbitration law, in which the government submits its mechanism to the International Center for Settlements of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The focus of this paper issue is how are the gains and losses of the Indonesian government in settling disputes between the state and foreign citizens on investment through ICSID? What is the concept of dispute settlement between state and foreign citizen regarding investment in national legal system based on Pancasila? The method used in this paper is qualitative analysis using postpositivism paradigm (Guba &amp; Lincoln) synergized with sociolegal approach. The writing of this paper reveals the national law is a law that was built by the Indonesian people themselves based on the value of divinity, humanitarian values and community values which is the great value of Pancasila as a view of life of the Indonesian nation in order to realize the purpose of the state. Indonesia suffers enormous losses when the settlement of disputes between the state and foreign citizens concerning investment is left to ICSID. Therefore, investment disputes should be resolved by the ASEAN arbitration body.</p><pre> </pre>



2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Agus Saiful Abib

<p>Indonesia adalah negara hukum (<em>rechtsstaat</em>), oleh karena itu hukum nasional harus berdaulat dan menjadi panglima dalam menyelesaiaikan seluruh permasalahan bangsa. Akan tetapi penyelesaian perselisihan antara negara dengan warga negara asing mengenai penanaman modal dalam hegemoni hukum arbitrase internasinal, dimana pemerintah menyerahkan mekanismenya kepada <em>International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputte</em> (ICSID). Fokus permasalahan makalah ini adalah Bagaimanakah keuntungan dan kerugian pemerintah Indonesia dalam penyelesian perselisihan antara negara dengan warganegara asing mengenai penanaman modal melalui ICSID? Bagaimanakah konsep penyelesian perselisihan antara negara dengan warga negara asing mengenai penanaman modal dalam sistem hukum nasional berbasis Pancasila?</p><p>Metode yang digunakan dalam makalah ini adalah Analisa kualitatif dengan menggunakan paradigma postpositivisme (Guba &amp; Lincoln) yang disinergikan dengan pendekatan sosiolegal. Penulisan makalah ini mengungkapkan Hukum nasional merupakan hukum yang dibangun oleh bangsa Indonesia sendiri berdasarkan nilai ketuhanan, nilai kemanusiaan dan nilai kemasyarakatan yang merupakan nilai agung Pancasila sebagai pandangan hidup bangsa Indonesia guna mewujudkan tujuan negara. Indonesia mengalami kerugian sangat besar ketika penyelesaian perselisihan antara negara dengan warganegara asing mengenai penanaman modal diserahkan kepada ICSID, Oleh karena itu, perselisihan penanaman modal sebaiknya diselesaikan oleh badan arbitrase ASEAN.</p><p>Indonesia is a state of law (rechtsstaat), therefore the national law must be sovereign and be the commander in solving all the problems of the nation. However, the settlement of disputes between the state and foreign citizens concerning investment in the hegemony of the international arbitration law, in which the government submits its mechanism to the International Center for Settlements of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The focus of this paper issue is how are the gains and losses of the Indonesian government in settling disputes between the state and foreign citizens on investment through ICSID? What is the concept of dispute settlement between state and foreign citizen regarding investment in national legal system based on Pancasila?</p><p>               The method used in this paper is qualitative analysis using postpositivism paradigm (Guba &amp; Lincoln) synergized with sociolegal approach. The writing of this paper reveals the national law is a law that was built by the Indonesian people themselves based on the value of divinity, humanitarian values and community values which is the great value of Pancasila as a view of life of the Indonesian nation in order to realize the purpose of the state. Indonesia suffers enormous losses when the settlement of disputes between the state and foreign citizens concerning investment is left to ICSID. Therefore, investment disputes should be resolved by the ASEAN arbitration body.</p><pre> </pre>



2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 50-52
Author(s):  
A.O. Rybalkin ◽  
◽  
M.V. Zielienina ◽  


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-74
Author(s):  
Syaugi Syaugi

    As a constitution, the Indonesian Constitution of 1945 regulates how the national economic system should be arranged and developed. In the perspective of constitution, the implementation of sharia economy does not mean the state directs a particular economic ideology. Philosophically, the ideals of Indonesian economic law is to initiate and prepare the legal concept of economic life. Shariah economy has a strong foundation both formally shariah and formallyconstitution. Formally shariah means the existence of shariah economy has a strong foundation in Indonesian legal system. Formally constitution means, in the context of the state, Shariah economy has a constitutional basis. The existence of laws relating to shariah economy shows that the Indonesian economic system givesa place to the shariah economy.



2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-56
Author(s):  
Françoise Auvray

AbstractThis contribution deals with the wrongful behaviour of public authorities, in this case in particular the Belgian State, and delves into a challenge that the multi-levelled legal order poses for the national tort system. It inquires how the violation of an international treaty relates to liability in the national legal system. More specifically, the author examines if it is necessary, when dealing with state liability, to limit the concept of fault to the infringements of international treaties with direct effect, excluding the violation of those without such effect.



Veritas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-255
Author(s):  
Rachmat Trijono

Criticism of the ius constitutum of Indonesia which is still not organized according to the appropriate grading and grundnorm has resulted in a reconstruction of the arrangement of the ius constitutum. The purpose of this paper is to reconstruct the arrangement of the constitutum ius which is spread in various scientific papers by the author. The method used is a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. The conclusion was that efforts had been made to rearrange the ius constitutum, however, if it was not carried out in a focused and thorough manner, there would not be a single national legal system that was unique and suited to the Indonesian situation. The necessity of realizing a national legal system is not just a dream.



2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (173) ◽  
pp. 85-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yereli Burçin ◽  
Erdem Seçilmiş ◽  
Alparslan Başaran

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the shadow economy and public debt in Turkey. We elaborate on the questions regarding the negative effects of shadow economy on the sustainability of public debt observing the estimates about the size of shadow economy in Turkey. In the light of some scholars? estimates, we re-evaluate the macroeconomic situation of Turkey. At the core of the study, we discuss how the government borrowing policies would differ if the shadow economy was included into the legal system. In order to examine the effects of shadow economy on sustainability, we use various sustainability indicators. There is a significant difference observed between the calculations which take into account the volume of shadow economy as a share of economic system and those that exclude shadow economy as an exogenous variable. .



2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-90
Author(s):  
Ramadhani Puji Astutik ◽  
Anita Trisiana

The formation of Indonesia's national legal system cannot be separated from the politics of law, because it is used as a guide in the process of making and enforcing the law to achieve a dream and national goal. The formation of the legal system in Indonesia has not gone well, Indonesia should have its own law. By having its own law, Indonesia will have national identity and will be seen as advanced by other countries. The formation of the national legal system in Indonesia is heavily influenced by external elements. It should maintain all the material sources of law that already exist in Indonesia. The objective of this study is to describe the formation of the national legal system in the State of Indonesia. This study uses a normative approach by using secondary data from library materials. The results of this study indicate that the formation of a national legal system is a process of developing a legal system and along with its element. With the development of the national legal system, it must be able to replace the Dutch colonial legal products with its own legal products. The development of the national legal system is a way to make changes in Indonesian legal products that must be in accordance with the values that are in people's lives. In the process of legal development, it is impossible to be separated from a legal politics.  



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document