scholarly journals Pelaksanaan Pembina Keamanan dan Ketertiban Masyarakat di Kepolisian Sektor Tapung

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-86
Author(s):  
Masri
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Community Policing ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Cultural Factors ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
National Police

The problem examined in this research is how is the implementation of Regulation of the Head of the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2015 concerning Community Policing on the main duties and functions and authority of Bhayangkara Community Security and Order in the Tapung Sector Police. This research method is carried out directly in the field according to the type of sociological legal research. The results showed that the implementation of regulations on Community Policing against the Tupoksi and the authority of Bhabinkamtibmas in the Tapung Sector Police has not achieved maximum results. Factors that hinder the implementation of regulations concerning Community Policing of the Tupoksi and the authority of Bhabinkamtibmas in the Tapung Sector Police are: applicable law, law enforcement officials, supporting facilities or facilities, community and cultural factors. Efforts taken are in the form of preventive and repressive measures.

scholarly journals MERINTANGI PENGUBURAN JENAZAH COVID-19 DITINJAU BERDASARKAN PASAL 178 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA

LEGALITAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rezky Rinaldy Dan Syamsudin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Body ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
The World ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Impact

Indonesia and even the world now feel the impact of the Corona virus outbreak (covid-19), in connection with it hindering the burial of the bodies of victims who died. The phenomenon of corpse rejection of corona virus patients (covid-19) continues to occur in various regions. In fact, the body must be buried immediately no later than 4 hours after being declared dead. The main reason people are reluctant to accept the bodies of patients co-19 because of fear of contracting. While the medical ensure that the body will not transmit the virus. The body in the coffin has been wrapped and declared sterile. The type of research used in this study is the type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results of the study showed that obstructing officers who will carry out official burials could indeed be convicted. Law enforcement officials can use Article 178 of the Criminal Code. not a complaint offense. Law enforcement officials can immediately take action without anyone complaining. "If the incident fulfills the elements contained in Article 178 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrators can be charged. However, it must look at intentions and actions as a condition for imposing a crime on someone.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Sulawesi Barat

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-21
Author(s):  
Sukmawati Sukmawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Community Support ◽  
Cultural Factors ◽  
Second Law ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Political Will ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Firm Commitment

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menjelaskan hukum dan peraturan dalam mendukung penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi, upaya penegakan hukum dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum korupsi di Sulawesi Barat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian Hukum Empiris. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: pertama, instrumen yuridis normatif yang mengatur penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi sudah memadai, tetapi membutuhkan komitmen yang kuat oleh petugas penegak hukum dalam mengimplementasikan artikel yang relevan, LSM dan dukungan masyarakat untuk penegakan hukum bagi korupsi dan kurangnya pemahaman untuk semua elemen penegakan hukum. kedua, upaya penegakan hukum untuk korupsi di Sulawesi Barat terdiri dari Partisipasi Masyarakat, Profesionalisme Aparat Penegak Hukum, Kemauan Politik Pemerintah Daerah dan Dukungan DPRD Sulawesi Barat. Ketiga, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum korupsi di Sulawesi Barat adalah faktor hukum, faktor penegakan hukum, fasilitas atau fasilitas, faktor masyarakat, dan faktor budaya. This study aims to analyze and explain the laws and regulations in supporting law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption, law enforcement efforts and the factors that influence law enforcement of corruption in West Sulawesi. The research method used is Empirical Law research. The results of this study indicate that: first, a normative juridical instrument that regulates the law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption is adequate, but it requires a firm commitment by law enforcement officials in implementing relevant articles, NGO and community support for law enforcement of corruption and lack of understanding for all law enforcement elements. second, law enforcement efforts for corruption in West Sulawesi consist of Community Participation, Professionalism of Law Enforcement Officials, Political Will of Regional Government and West Sulawesi DPRD Support. Third, the factors that influence law enforcement of corruption in West Sulawesi are legal factors, law enforcement factors, facilities or facilities, community factors, and cultural factors.

scholarly journals Jaksa Selaku Eksekutor dalam Putusan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-158
Author(s):  
I Wayan Edi Kurniawan ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Internet Studies ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Criminal Offender ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Legal Force

Enforcement of the criminal justice system in Indonesia can also be carried out by implementing court decisions that have permanent legal force. The party that has the authority to implement the judge's decision is the prosecutor. In the contents of the criminal decision, the prosecutor's office has the authority to immediately carry out the execution in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. This study aims to determine the authority of the prosecutor in carrying out the execution, and to determine the execution mechanism for the crime of murder. This research uses normative methods, statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, tertiary legal materials, document studies, literature studies, internet studies and analysis of legal interpretations, and descriptive analysis. The only executing agency in the State of Indonesia is the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The meaning of executor is the party who has the authority to carry out court decisions based on the applicable law. The results showed that in carrying out court decisions, the prosecutor's office had duties and functions, one of which was as an executor as well as a general prosecutor. A decision that can be executed is only one that has permanent legal force and there are no more legal remedies. Prosecutors as law enforcement officers in carrying out their duties must be based on the applicable legal rules. Do not let the prosecutor violate rules that are not under their authority. Law enforcement officials who carry out executions must carry out the execution as quickly as possible and no criminal offender is executed late.

scholarly journals The Difference of Authority between Satpol PP and Polri in Creating General Involvement

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 13-27
Author(s):  
Tri Suhartanto ◽  
Indra Perwira
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Public Order ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Fire Brigade ◽  
Domestic Security ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Enforcement Authority ◽  
National Police

This study aims to analyze the differences in law enforcement authority between Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol Pamong Praja/ Satpol PP) and Indonesian National Police (Polri) in creating public order and peace of society and how the differences could cause an overlap in their implementation. The research method used is normative juridical legal research using a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results showed that differences in law enforcement authority between Satpol PP and Polri are in creating public order and peace of society.  Satpol PP has an authority to maintain public order, while the National Police is more concerned with maintaining domestic security; Meanwhile, in carrying out their duties, the Satpol PP often overlaps and clashes with other law enforcers, especially the National Police. It cannot be denied that it often happens that the National Police finally have to become a "fire brigade" when carrying out their duties. The Satpol PP has to clash with the community, which then arises an anarchic situation. When in situations that could lead to further disturbance in security and public order, the National Police finally intervened. What often happened was that the National Police collided with the community because of the anarchist situation that had developed too far.

scholarly journals KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN BUDAYA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boni Suparto Wuarlela
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Early Age ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Unitary State ◽  
The Future ◽  
Learning Programs ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government

One of the biggest problems faced by the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is the handling of the problem of corruption which seems to never end, both in terms of eradicating or implementing laws regarding corruption. In Indonesia, an independent institution specifically dealing with corruption issues has been established, namely the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) since 2002. However, the fact is that until 2020 it has not really been able to effectively address the problem of corruption in Indonesia with various arrests made by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). proves that the problem of corruption that occurs inthis country and the government in Indonesia needs serious attention from various parties who play an important role in dealing with the problem. This writing aims to determine the extent to which legal certainty applies in the process of eradicating corruption in Indonesia, the researchmethod used is the normative research method. Based on the results of the research conducted, it can be concluded that the laws governing and law enforcement officials inovercoming the problem of corruption in Indonesia have not been fully effective in providing legal certainty to corrupt actors and the application of existing laws has not been able to fully guarantee the disappearance or no more corruption. will happen in the future, and there is a need for prevention that can give birth to new corruptors in the future by further increasing anti-corruption learning programs and carrying out various socialization or prevention of acts of corruption from an early age which is felt to help overcome the problem of corruptors in this country.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Whistleblower dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 332-336
Author(s):  
Gusti Nyoman Adung Setiawan ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Legal Security ◽  
Statutory Regulation

A wistleblower is someone who is aware of a criminal act and notifies it to law enforcement officials. The role of whistleblowers is very important to help expose acts of narcotics abuse. The purpose of this study is to determine the legal protection arrangements for whistleblowers in narcotics abuse and to find out legal protection for whistleblowers in narcotics crime. The research method used in this research is normative legal research method normative legal research method which is carried out by examining a statutory regulation related to the problem being discussed and through a conceptual approach or conceptual approach which shows a concept, and uses a conceptual approach. doctrine, namely the views or thoughts of experts related to the science of law. A person who is a whistleblower or notifier in narcotics abuse always bears a reply from those who feel aggrieved or aggrieved as a result of a notification or report from a whistleblower, legal security for a person who is a pioneer or whistleblower in investigating criminal acts of narcotics abuse is important given to the authorities so that all people are willing to become reporters in order to support legal institutions to reveal and arrest narcotics abuse. Security for whistleblowers must be made strictly in law so that security for whistleblowers can be upheld.

scholarly journals Legal Problems of the Financial Services Authority and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia in Enforcing Banking Crimes

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 116
Author(s):  
Moh Achyar ◽  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Teguh Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Cultural Factors ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Object Of Study ◽  
National Police

<em>The Financial Services Authority in practice often face institutional problems that still rely on the position of outside investigators, but on the other hand it must maintain its independence. The purpose of this study is to examine and to analyze the Legal Problems of the Financial Services Authority and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia in Enforcing Banking Crime. The method used in this study was the constructive paradigm. The research approach used was empirical juridical, namely legal research. The object of study were provisions and enforcement or implementation of legal provisions in action on every legal event that occurs in the community (in concreto). The data analysis used qualitative analysis. The results of the study found that the problem of the Financial Services Authority and the National Police of the Republic of Indonesia in conducting criminal acts against banking crimes was due to legislative factors or legal substance, structure and legal culture. Provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in which Civil Servant Investigators or PPNS are not necessarily able to collect all the evidence specified. The Second factor is the Law Enforcement Officials. In quality, the law enforcement factor that impedes the role of the FSA in investigating banking crimes is the limited professionalism in the field of investigation, so that knowledge and technical skills of investigation need to be improved. FSA in investigating banking crimes must recruit Police Investigators and Prosecutors, FSA must make an agreement with Polri in conducting investigations into banking crimes so that they can immediately arrest suspects who are considered to have committed banking criminal acts. The third is the cultural factors of society. In terms of the cultural factors of the community, the intensity of the community in its involvement in enforcement and supporting the investigation will be hampered by the lack of clarity in the position of the investigative institution.</em>

scholarly journals KONSTRUKSI HUKUM DALAM PEMBUKTIAN TERHADAP KEJAHATAN MAYANTARA

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1202
Author(s):  
Ni Luh Ketut Dewi Yani Putri
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Cyber Crime ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Cyber Space

Tujuan penulisan ini untuk memenuhi dan melengkapi persyaratan untuk memperoleh gelar Magiter Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana. Tujuan khusus dari penulisan ini yaitu untuk mengetahui pembuktian serta yurisdiksi kejahatan mayantara dalam persidangan dan konstruksi hukum dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan merupakan metode penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Teknik yang digunakan melalui studi kepustakaan yang diperoleh langsung dari bahan hukum primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur hukum yang terkait. Hambatan proses pembuktian dan yurisdiksi cyber crime yakni belum diaturnya alat bukti elektronik secara sah dalam KUHAP, masih diperdebatkannya kesaksian de auditu, serta sulit menemukan saksi yang berkompeten dalam menyaksikan kegiatan cyber crime. Mengenai yurisdiksi dalam kegiatan cyber crime juga perlu diatur kembali mengingat sangatlah sukar untuk memastikan dimana kejadiannya, kapan dilakukannya dan bagaimana perbuatan pelakunya, mengingat kejahatan ini merupakan global crime yang tidak jelas yurisdiksinya di samping berkaitan dengan cyber space yang pelakunya tidak kasat mata. Adapun Kebijakan Terhadap Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime) yakni melalui  modernisasi hukum pidana adapun beberapa alternative seperti Menghilangkan beberapa pasal- pasal pada Undang- Undang Cyber Crime yang tidak dipakai lagi (usang), Mengamandemen KUHP, Mengamandemen KUHAP, Mengamandemen Undang-Undang Teknologi Informasi, Dalam Pembuktian cyber crime aparat penegak hukum terutama hakim harus berani melakukan “rechtsvinding”. The purpose of this writing is to fulfill and supplement the requirements for the Magiter degree of legal sciences at the Faculty of Law of Udayana University. The specific purpose of this writing is to know the evidence and the jurisdiction of crime between the law in the trial and the construction of laws in Indonesia's laws and regulations. The method used is a normative legal research method through a statutory approach and a concept approach. Techniques used through literature studies obtained directly from the primary legal material in the form of legislation and related legal literature. The barriers to the proving process of cyber crime and jurisdiction are not in the legitimate electronic proof tool in the criminal CODE, still in the testimony of De Auditu, and difficult to find witnesses who are competent in witnessing cyber crime activities. Regarding the jurisdiction in cyber crime activities also need to be rearranged considering that it is difficult to ensure where the event, when it does and how the perpetration, considering this crime is a global crime that is unclear its jurisdiction in addition to the cyber space that the perpetration of invisible eyes. The policy on Cyber Crime is through the modernization of criminal law as some alternative such as eliminating some of the articles on Cyber Crime laws that are not used anymore (obsolete), amend KUHP, amend KUHAP, amend the Information Technology law, in proving Cyber Crime law enforcement officials, especially the judges must dare to do "rechtsvinding".

scholarly journals THE LEGAL ACT ON COUNTERFEITING THE COVID-19 VACCINE IN INDONESIAN HEALTH LAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 273
Author(s):  
Sahuri Lasmadi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
International Criminal ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Global Warning ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Online Form

The International Criminal Police Organization has officially issued a global warning to law enforcement officials in 194 member countries to prepare to prevent and deal with various world criminal networks that will seek to utilize the Covid-19 vaccine, both physically. The online form is counterfeiting the Covid-19 vaccine. This study aims to analyze the criminal act of counterfeiting the Covid-19 vaccine from the Health Law in Indonesia. The research method used is the Normative Law research method, which examines library materials or secondary data. Normative legal research is also called doctrinal legal research.  The criminal act of counterfeiting the Covid-19 vaccine is generally regulated in Article 386 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code relating to acts of fraud and forgery. However, it is specifically regulated in the provisions regarding penalties for distributing fake vaccines in Indonesia as regulated in Articles 196, 197, 198, and 201 Act No. 36 of 2009 concerning health. The ingredients are everyone deliberately and producing and circulating counterfeit vaccine preparations. For the criminal act ofCovid-19 vaccine counterfeiting corporate, the corporation can be subject to additional penalties in the form of revocation of business licenses and revocation of legal entity status.

scholarly journals PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM TINDAK PELAKU PENYEBARAN HOAKS

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1301
Author(s):  
Glery Lazuardi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Analytical Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials

Tujuan penelitian ini yakni memberikan masukan kepada aparat penegak hukum agar menggunakan pendekatan Restorative Justice terhadap pelaku penyebaran informasi tidak benar atau hoaks. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif analitis. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan pendekatan Restorative Justice dapat diterapkan kepada pelaku penyebaran hoaks. Sebab, penerapan Restorative Justice sudah sesuai dengan falsafah bangsa Indonesia, yaitu Pancasila khususnya sila ke-4, yang mengedepankan musyawarah. Dengan demikian, harapannya upaya pemidanaan terhadap pelaku penyebaran hoaks dapat dikurangi dan dilakukan pendekatan melalui cara mediasi antara korban dengan pelaku penyebaran hoaks. The purpose of this study is to provide input to law enforcement officials using the Restorative Justice approach to the perpetrators of disseminating hoaxes. This study uses a normative legal research method with a descriptive analytical approach. The results of this study indicate that the Restorative Justice approach can be applied to the perpetrators of hoax distribution. Because, the application of Restorative Justice is in accordance with the philosophy of the Indonesian people, namely Pancasila especially the 4th precepts, which prioritizes deliberation. Thus, the hope of efforts to reduce the perpetrators of hoax distribution can be reduced and approach is carried out through mediation between the victim and the perpetrators of the spread of hoaxes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document