scholarly journals Dimensi Pengawasan pada Tindak Lanjut Laporan Pengaduan Masyarakat kepada Komisi Kejaksaan dalam Tinjauan Hukum Progresif

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-230
Author(s):  
R Muhamad Ibnu Mazjah
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Authority ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Operational Level ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
Legal Arguments ◽  
The Republic

Presidential Decree No. 18 of 2011 on the Prosecutors Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (PCRI) does not contain textual procedural law provisions regarding follow-up reports on public complaints. This raises a question of whether the PCRI has the authority to carry out direct examinations and investigations as part of its authority to follow up public complaints. Based on the provisions of Articles 4 a and 4 b of the Presidential Decree No. 18 of 2011, it is acknowledged that after PCRI received public complaints, PCRI has two options in exercising its authority, namely carrying out a direct follow-up or forwarding these public complaints to the Attorney General and have it followed-up by internal supervisors. However, the absence of written or textual provisions in the Presidential Decree No. 18 of 2011 regarding this matter has resulted in the interpretation that PCRI is not authorized to conduct direct examinations, inspections, and investigations. This encourages the author to interpret that the authority of the PCRI in carrying out the follow-up on public complaints is based on a progressive legal perspective. This writing uses a normative research method, which aims to obtain legal arguments about the dimensions of supervision as a follow-up to public complaint reports. This paper is expected to introduce a reasoned discussion of PCRI in carrying out the supervisory duties. At the end part of this paper, there are recommendations regarding the need for regulatory authority as reinforcement for PCRI in carrying out supervisory duties and its authority to impose sanctions in the event of non-compliance. At the operational level, it is necessary to have a common perception shared between PCRI and Prosecutors of the Republic of Indonesia to create synergy in carrying out supervisory duties. AbstrakPerpres Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 tentang Komisi Kejaksaan RI (KKRI) tidak memuat secara tekstual ketentuan hukum acara tentang tindak lanjut laporan pengaduan masyarakat (lapdumas). Hal ini menimbulkan pertanyaan, apakah KKRI memiliki kewenangan melakukan pemeriksaan dan pengusutan secara langsung sebagai bagian dari kewenangan menindaklanjuti lapdumas. Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 4 a dan 4 b Perpres No. 18 Tahun 2011 dapat diketahui bahwa setelah KKRI menerima lapdumas, KKRI memiliki dua opsi kewenangan yakni menindaklanjuti secara langsung atau meneruskan lapdumas tersebut kepada Jaksa Agung untuk ditindaklanjuti pengawas internal. Namun, tidak adanya ketentuan tertulis di dalam Perpres No. 18 Tahun 2011, menimbulkan tafsir KKRI tidak berwenang melakukan pemeriksaan, pengusutan, penyelidikan secara langsung. Hal ini mendorong penulis untuk menafsirkan kewenangan KKRI dalam menindaklanjuti lapdumas berdasarkan perspektif hukum progresif. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif, yang bertujuan untuk mendapatkan argumentasi hukum tentang dimensi pengawasan sebagai tindak lanjut laporan pengaduan masyarakat. Tulisan ini diharapkan dapat berdaya guna dalam pengembanan tugas pengawasan oleh KKRI. Di bagian akhir, tertuang rekomendasi mengenai perlunya pengaturan kewenangan sebagai penguatan bagi KKRI dalam menjalankan tugas pengawasan serta kewenangan penjatuhan sanksi apabila terjadi ketidakpatuhan. Pada tataran operasional, diperlukan penyamaan persepsi antara KKRI dengan Kejaksaan RI agar tercipta sinergitas dalam menjalankan tugas pengawasan.

scholarly journals FUNGSI LEMBAGA OMBUDSMAN DALAM PENGAWASAN PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK PADA BIDANG PENDIDIKAN DI KOTA SURABAYA

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atik Nur Faizun
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Community Empowerment ◽  
Field Education ◽  
Talk Shows ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Republic ◽  
And Function ◽  
The City

This study aims to determine the function of the Ombudsman Institution Supervision of Public Services In The Field Education in Surabaya and to determine the follow-up of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia in an effort to improve public services in education in the city of Surabaya. Data qualitative research is then presented descriptively, that is to parse, explain and illustrate in accordance with the problems linked to this research. The research was conducted in the Office of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia East Java province to interview Chief Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia Representatives of East Java, and Assistant Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia Representatives of East Java. The results showed that the existence of the Ombudsman in Indonesia has been regulated through the provisions of Law No. 37 of 2008 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, which was previously the existence of the Ombudsman has been in Presidential Decree No. 44 of 2000, but seems still very vague. Many things are not regulated in detail and firm, it is different with Law Number 37 Year 2008, in the Act No. 37 of 2008 what became the object of scrutiny Ombudsman highly emphasized and detailed mentioned. While the regulations governing oversight bodies that exist, it appears the position and function of the Ombudsman as an institution is not the same supervision by institutions other oversight, both external and internal. The function of the Ombudsman In Control of Public Services In The Field Of Education In Surabaya forms that do (1) prevention of maladministration in the field of education in the form of community empowerment through a form of socialization, talk shows, interactive dialogue, gatherings, lectures and others as well as activities Investigation. (2) the handling of complaints in the field of education through the investigation, clarification, mediation, and monitoring. And Procedures for Examination and Completion Report Ombudsman Republic of Indonesia in an effort to improve public services in education in the city of Surabaya in accordance with Law No. 37 of 2008 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. Keywords : Public Services, Oversight, Ombudsman.

scholarly journals THE ROLE OF PROSECUTOR OFFICE IN THE ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS IN INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
Sri Endah Wahyuningsih ◽  
Agus Sunaryo
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Police Agency ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
The Public ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic

In fact, there are still many cases of corruption that have not been revealed; this resulted in the public to be pessimistic with the seriousness of the Prosecutor Office in uncovering variouscases of corruption that are happening today. The purpose of this study is to know the role ofthe Prosecutor Office in the eradication of criminal acts, to obtain an overview of the mechanismof corruption handling by prosecutors in Indonesia and to analyze the obstacles and solutionsin eradicating crime in the Attorney General. The research method was sociological juridical,and data collection were gained by using observation and interview. The existence and role ofthe Public Prosecution Service in eradicating corruption crime begins when the case has notbeen transferred to the Court until the execution of the decision of the Court. However, in thecriminal act of corruption the Prosecutor’s Office has the authority as a public prosecutor aswell as an investigator. The authority of the prosecutor as a special criminal investigator shall beregulated by Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney of the Republic of Indonesia inArticle 30 paragraph (1) letter d. In addition, in its role against the eradication of corruption, theProsecutor’s Office has always conducted a coordination relationship with the Police Agency andthe Corruption Eradication Commission. The mechanism for handling corruption in the AttorneyGeneral Office, through several procedures already set out in the law includes Investigation,Investigation and Prosecution.

scholarly journals The Urgency of Public Prosecution Service of The Republic of Indonesia In The Settlement of Replacement Money In Criminal Acts of Corruption Based on Law Number 3 of 1971

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (07) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lusiana Lamture, Supardi.S ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Public Prosecution ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
Public Prosecution Service ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Data Collection Technique

In ensnaring the corruptors, not from the upstream, but from the downstream, namely by tracing where the flow of corruption funds ends up. It must be understood that a corruptor who then drains the proceeds of corruption means that he has committed two crimes at once. Therefore, the follow the money method is more effective than the follow The Suspect method, namely the handling of criminal acts that prioritize the perpetrators of crimes. With the follow the money approach, activities to hide or disguise the proceeds of corruption can be prevented and eradicated. However, this must still be regulated so that its implementation can be carried out in a concrete manner so that there is no legal vacuum in the implementation of its execution by the Indonesian Prosecutor's Office. The data collection technique in this research is using the library research method. While the analysis technique carried out on the legal materials that have been collected by the author will be done deductively. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of replacement money in criminal acts of corruption is contained in Law Number 3 of 1971 and has been revoked and amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 jo. so that in this case, there is an important role by the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, finally the Attorney General's Office issued Perja Number PER-020/A/JA/07/2014 and then upgraded to Perja Number 19 of 2020 and followed up with a Circular Letter of the Deputy Attorney General for Civil and Administrative Countries with Number SE-001/G/Gs/03/2021 dated March 26, 2021.

scholarly journals Pengaturan Bukti Petunjuk pada Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha dalam Kerangka Hukum Pembuktian di Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 575
Author(s):  
Sterry Fendy Andih
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
District Court ◽  
Economic Evidence ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Research Show

Regulations related to evidence in the procedural law of business competition still cause debate because regulations related to evidence of instructions that apply in the business competition procedural law are different from the regulation of evidence in the procedural law that generally applies in Indonesia, especially if there are objections to the KPPU's decision submitted to the district court. The formulation of the problem examined is related to the procedures for resolving business competition cases by the business competition supervisory commission and the use of evidence evidence in business competition law within the criminal procedural framework in Indonesia. This type of research method used is a normative legal research method with a proof of law approach. The results of the research show that the procedure for handling cases by KPPU based on Perkom 1/2019 is sourced from KPPU's reports and initiatives. The stages or process of procedure for handling cases by KPPU consists of the initial stages (receipt of reports or KPPU initiatives), investigations, commission assembly sessions (preliminary hearing and follow-up hearings), and decisions (deliberations of commission assemblies and reading of decisions and implementing decisions) . The use of evidence of guidance in business competition law contracted in Perkom 1/2019 can still lead to this debate because the procedural law used in general courts (if there is an objection to the KPPU's decision) is criminal or civil procedural law, which if understood there are still differences fundamental evidence related to these instructions. The evidence evidence can be obtained through economic evidence and communication evidence whereas in criminal procedural law the limit is limited to evidence evidence evidence obtained from evidence witnesses, letters and statements of the defendant. Pengaturan terkait alat bukti petunjuk dalam hukum acara persaingan usaha masih menimbulkan perdebatan dikarenakan pengaturan terkait alat bukti petunjuk yang berlaku dalam hukum acara persaingan usaha berbeda halnya dengan pengaturan alat bukti petunjuk dalam hukum acara yang secara umum berlaku di Indonesia, khususnya apabila terjadi keberatan atas putusan KPPU yang diajukan kepada pengadilan negeri. Adapun rumusan permasalahan yang dikaji adalah terkait tata cara penyelesain perkara persaingan usaha oleh komisi pengawas persaingan usaha dan penggunaan bukti petunjuk pada hukum persaingan usaha dalam kerangka hukum acara pidana di indonesia. Jenis metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan hukum pembuktian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tata cara penanganan perkara oleh KPPU berdasarkan Perkom 1/2019 adalah bersumber dari laporan dan insiatif KPPU.  Adapun tahapan atau proses tata cara penanganan perkara oleh KPPU terdiri dari tahapan awal (penerimaan laporan atau insiatif KPPU), penyelidikan, sidang majelis komisi (sidang pemeriksaan pendahuluan dan sidang pemeriksaan lanjutan), dan putusan (musyawarah majelis komisi dan pembacaan putusan serta pelaksanaan putusan). Penggunaan bukti petunjuk pada hukum persaingan usaha yang dikontruksikan dalam Perkom 1/2019 masih dapat menimbulkan perdebatan hal ini dikarenakan hukum acara yang dipergunakan pada peradilan umum (apabila terjadi keberatan atas putusan KPPU) adalah hukum acara pidana atau perdata, yang mana apabila dipahami masih terdapat perbedaan mendasar terkait alat bukti petunjuk tersebut. Alat bukti petunjuk dapat diperoleh melalui bukti ekonomi dan bukti komunikasi sedangkan dalam hukum acara pidana dibatasi secara limitatif alat bukti petunjuk diperoleh dari alat bukti keterangan saksi, surat dan keterangan terdakwa.

scholarly journals PERKEMBANGAN KEWENANGAN PEMBATALAN PERATURAN DAERAH DAN PERATURAN KEPALA DAERAH

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
Eka NAM Sihombing
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Regulatory Authority ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Legal Norm ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Local Regulation ◽  
The Republic

ABSTRAKPutusan Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 menyatakan Pasal 251 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah terkait dengan kewenangan pembatalan peraturan daerah kabupaten/kota tidak lagi bisa dibatalkan Menteri Dalam Negeri atau gubernur. Melengkapi putusan tersebut, Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Putusan Nomor 56/PUU-XIV/2016 menyatakan pemerintah pusat juga tidak lagi memiliki kewenangan untuk melakukan pembatalan peraturan daerah provinsi. Putusan tersebut tidak serta merta menyelesaikan persoalan terkait dengan kewenangan pembatalan peraturan daerah, hal ini dikarenakan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi hanya berlaku bagi peraturan daerah provinsi dan peraturan daerah kabupaten/kota. Rumusan masalah yang akan diurai dalam tulisan ini adalah bagaimana kewenangan pembatalan peraturan daerah dan peraturan kepala daerah oleh Menteri dan gubernur pasca Putusan Nomor 137/PUU-XIII/2015 dan Nomor 56/PUUXIV/2016. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam negara dengan bentuk kesatuan memang sudah sepatutnya pemerintah yang tingkatannya lebih tinggi diberikan kewenangan untuk melakukan pengawasan terhadap regulasi yang lahir di daerah. Implementasi dari pengawasan tersebut dapat dilakukan dengan melakukan pembinaan kepada daerah melalui penguatan executive preview atau pengujian terhadap suatu norma hukum sebelum sah mengikat secara umum, hal ini sejalan dengan ruh ketentuan Pasal 24A UUD NRI 1945.Kata kunci: pembatalan, peraturan daerah, peraturan kepala daerah. ABSTRACTConstitutional Court Decision Number137/PUUXIII/2015 stated in Article 251 of Law Number 23 of 2014 on Local Government related to the issue if regulatory authority annulment of local and leaders regulations can no longer be withdrawn by the Minister of Home Affairs or Governor. Completing the decision, the Constitutional Court through Decision Number 56/PUU-XIV/2016 stated that the Central Government also no longer has the authority to annul the Provincial Regulation. The Constitutional Court Decision does not necessarily solve the problems related to the authority annulment of the local regulations. This is because the Constitutional Court Decision only applies to the Provincial Regulation and District/City Regulation. The formulation of the problems elaborated through this analysis is how the Authority Annulment of Regional Regulation by the Minister and the Governor after the issuance of Court Decision Number 137/PUUXIII/2015 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 56/PUU-XIV/2016. This analysis makes use of the legal juridical normative research method. The results show that in a state of unity it is appropriate that higher levels of government are given the authority to supervise the regulations set in the regions. The supervision can be implemented by conducting such a guidance to the region through the strengthening of executive preview or legal norm review before it is legally binding in general. This is in line with the spirit of Article 24A of the 1945 Constituition of the Republic of Indonesia.Keywords: annulment, local regulation, regional head regulation.

scholarly journals Gugatan Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Eksekusi Barang Sitaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Tedhy Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Republic

The criminal act of corruption is a financial and humanitarian crime that harms the state and reduces the people's right to better access to welfare. The settlement of corruption cases often involves many parties, including good third parties related to the evidence seized by the Prosecutor. Judgments in judicial practice still cause new problems. The Panel of Judges imposed a crime in the form of appropriation of property in the control of a well-intentioned third party. The purpose of this paper is to examine the legal status of a third party who has good faith in the execution of confiscated goods in the case of corruption and the role of the prosecutor in a third-party lawsuit related to the execution of confiscated goods in the case of corruption. The research method used is normative legal research with statutes approach and case approach. The study indicates that the legal measures that can be done by a good third party against the confiscated objects in the case of corruption must be in accordance with Article 19 of the Anti-Corruption Eradication Act. The role of the public prosecutor in a civil case is not a public prosecutor or executor but in a lawsuit as a State Attorney Attorney under Article 30 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 Year 2004 regarding the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia. Tindak pidana korupsi adalah kejahatan keuangan dan kemanusiaan yang merugikan negara dan mengurangi hak rakyat untuk mendapat akses kesejahteraan yang lebih baik. Penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana korupsi seringkali melibatkan banyak pihak, termasuk pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik terkait dengan barang bukti yang disita oleh Penuntut Umum. Putusan-putusan dalam praktek peradilan masih menimbulkan masalah baru. Majelis Hakim menjatuhkan pidana berupa perampasan harta dalam penguasaan pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengkaji kedudukan hukum pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik dalam eksekusi barang sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi dan peranan jaksa dalam gugatan pihak ketiga terkait eksekusi barang sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa Upaya Hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik terhadap benda sitaan dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi harus sesuai dengan Pasal 19 Undang-undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Peran jaksa dalam perkara perdata bukan sebagai penuntut umum atau eksekutor akan tetapi dalam perkara gugatan sebagai Jaksa Pengacara Negara berdasarkan Pasal 30 Ayat (2) Undang-undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.

scholarly journals Putusan Sela Perkara Perdata Bila Penggugat Asal Meninggal Dunia

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 588-593
Author(s):  
I Kadek Agus Widiastika Adiputra ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Legal Literature ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Arguments ◽  
The Republic

The decision of the Panel of Judges on Civil Case No. 414/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps, which continued the trial and set an interim decision even though one of the plaintiffs had died, contradicted the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 431K/Sip/1973, dated May 9, 1974. This study aimed to examine the setting of interlocutory decisions on the civil procedural law and examine the judge's considerations in determining the continuation of the trial process in the case of decision Number: 414/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps when the original plaintiff died. This research was designed by using normative legal research and legislation approaches. The data used were primary and secondary legal data collected through documentation techniques by processing and analyzing legal literature that had been collected using legal arguments. The results of the study indicated that the provision of interlocutory decisions was regulated in Article 185 HIR/196 RBg. Interlocutory decisions could be divided into 4 groups, namely preparatory, interlocutor, incidental, and provisional. The judges' considerations in civil cases Number: 414/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps The Intervenient asked the Panel of Judges to be given the position of a Plaintiff-Intervenor based on the legal basis of disputes over property rights, over the land and buildings on it with the Intervenient's position as a buyer in good faith.

scholarly journals PARADOKS PEMAKZULAN PRESIDEN/WAKIL PRESIDEN DALAM PRINSIP NEGARA HUKUM

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
M. Saoki Oktava ◽  
Riska Ari Amalia
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Political Process ◽  
Vice President ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
Constitutional State ◽  
Presidential Decree ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Basic Strength

The promulgation of the implementation of the Constitutional Court's decision is in the spotlight of other State Institutions that have repealed articles that have been canceled by the Constitutional Court in the new Law. Likewise with the authority of the Constitutional Court. In the process of presidential impeachment by the MPR there are indications that the Constitutional Court's Decision stating that the president and / or vice-president were proven guilty by the Constitutional Court can also be set aside, given the political process in the MPR which refers to the minimum decision-making conditions. The president is attended by at least ¾ of the total number of MPR members and is approved by at least 2/3 of the total members present. The research method used is a normative research method with the statue approach approach. Sources and Types of Legal Materials namely primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials related to this study. From the results of the study, the paradox of the presidential impeachment in the principle of the rule of law, the process of presidential impeachment according to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia NRI is carried out by political and legal mechanisms. The Basic Strength of the Constitutional Court Decision in the Context of Presidential Decree In State Principles is Article 1 paragraph 3 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia NRI "the state of Indonesia is a constitutional State" adjudicates at the first and last level that causes the Constitutional Court's decision to be final and binding for the MPR in impeaching the President and or Deputy PresidentKeywords: paradox, presidential election, principles rule of lawABSTRAKPromlematika implementasi putusan MK menjadi sorotan terhadap Lembaga Negara lain yangmemuculkan kembali pasal-pasal yang telah dibatalkan oleh MK dalam Undang-undang yang baru. Demikian juga terhadap wewenang MK Dalam proses pemakzulan presiden oleh MPR ada indikasi Putusan MK yang menyatakan presiden dan atau wakil presiden terbukti bersalah oleh MK dapat juga dikesampingkan, mengingat proses politik di MPR yang mengacu pada  syarat pengambilan keputusan minimal syarat dukungan Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden minimal dihadiri oleh sekurang-kurangnya ¾ dari jumlah anggota MPR dan disetujui oleh sekurang-kurangnya 2/3 dari jumlah anggota yang hadir. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundanng-undangan (statue Approach). Sumber dan Jenis Bahan Hukum yaitu Bahan hukum primer, Bahan Hukum Skunder dan Bahan Hukum Tersier yang berkaitan dengan penelitian ini. Dari hasil penelitian, terhadap paradoks  pemakzulan presiden dalam prinsip Negara hukum, proses pemakzulan presiden menurut UUD NRI Tahun 1945 dilakukan dengan mekanisme polik dan hukum. Dasar Kekuatan Putusan MK dalam Konteks  Pemakzulan Presiden Dalam Prinsip Negara adalah Pasal 1 ayat 3 UUD NRI Tahun 1945 “negara Indonesia adalah Negara hukum” mengadili pada tingkat pertama dan terakhir yang menimbulkan  putusan MK bersifat final dan mengikat bagi MPR dalam melakukan Pemakzulan Presiden dan atau Wakil Pesiden.Kata kunci: paradoks pemakzulan presiden, pinsip negara hukum

scholarly journals The Role Model of Guiding Team of Regional Government and Development in the Prosecutor District of Padang Panjang in the Prevention Attempt of Corruption

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 563
Author(s):  
Mevina Nora ◽  
Ismansyah Ismansyah ◽  
Yuslim Yuslim
Keyword(s):  
Role Model ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Regional Government ◽  
Government Institutions ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
The City

The implementation of a clean government of corruption, collusion and nepotism, President of The Republic of Indonesia Joko Widodo made a program to run the government in 9 (Nine) Priority programs known as Nawa Cita. As a follow-up to the 9 (nine) Priority Programs of Nawa Cita, dated 6 May 2015 President of The Republic of Indonesia Joko Widodo issued Presidential Instruction (Inpres) Number 7 concerning Action on the Prevention and Eradication of Corruption. Quickly, The Prosecutor of The Republic of Indonesia respond to what the President said. The Prosecutor of The Republic of Indonesia as the government institutions authorized by the Law to eradicate and prevent corruption has formed a Government and Development Guards Team at the Central and Regional levels. The establishment of this Team based on the Decision Letter of Attorney General of The Republic of Indonesia Number: KEP-152 / A / JA / 10/2015 dated 1 October 2015 concerning Establishment of the Government and Development Guards Team of The Prosecutor of The Republic of Indonesia or known as TP4. It will support the goverment and development at the central and regional levels through by guarding in the planning and implementation proces of development, including in to prevent mistakes and state losses that result in Corruption Crimes. Head Attorney District of Padang Panjang has formed a Regional Government and Development Guards Team known as TP4D based on the Command Letter Number : SK-17 / N.3.16 / Dek.3 / 10/2015 dated 21 October 2015, concerning the Appointment of Officers Regional Government and Development Guards Team (TP4D) The Prosecutor District of Padang Panjang. In its existence, TP4D The Prosecutor District of Padang Panjang has contributed a lot to the development process in the city of Padang Panjang in preventing corruption in development efforts.

scholarly journals Kedudukan Hukum Deponeering dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-29
Author(s):  
Desi Ratnasari ◽  
Sahuri Lasmadi ◽  
Elly Sudarti
Keyword(s):  
Public Interest ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

This article aims to identify and analyze the legal implications and analyze the regulation of public interest as a condition for implementing deponeering by the Attorney General for the sake of the public interest in the perspective of the development of criminal procedural law. This research is a legal research, obtained from statutory studies (statute approach), concept (conceptual approach), cases. The result of this research is that there is discrimination against equality before the law contained in Article 27 Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and can trigger misinterpretation by the Attorney General. Then in its implementation there is no clear regulation regarding the application of the opportunity principle related to the authority of the attorney general in the implementation of case waiver (deponeering) for the public interest in the Criminal Procedure Code.  Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis implikasi hukum serta menganalisis terhadap regulasi kepentingan umum sebagai syarat pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) oleh Jaksa Agung demi kepentingan umum dalam prespektif perkembangan hukum acara pidana.  Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum, yang diperoleh dari studi perundang-undangan (statute approach), konsep (conceptual approach), kasus. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah adanya diskriminatif terhadap equality before the law yang terdapat dalam Pasal 27 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dan dapat memicu salah tafsir oleh Jaksa Agung. Lalu di dalam pelaksanaannya belum terdapat regulasi yang jelas mengenai penerapan asas oportunitas yang berhubungan dengan kewenangan jaksa agung dalam pelaksanaan pengesampingan perkara (deponeering) demi kepentingan umum di dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum acara Pidana (KUHAP). 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document