scholarly journals Sanksi Hukum terhadap Pejabat Negara yang Melanggar Protokol Kesehatan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 308-314
Author(s):  
I Kadek Arya Andika ◽  
I Nyoman Sugiartha ◽  
I Nyoman Sutama

The corona virus or what is known as Covid-19 is an infectious disease caused by a new type of coronavirus that was discovered at the end of 2019 in the city of Wuhan, China, which has spread throughout the world, has killed hundreds of people and infected tens of thousands of others. Previously, Indonesia was one of the countries that had not been infected, and finally in February the corona virus entered Indonesia. The spread of the corona virus causes panic among Indonesian people. The purpose of this study is to uncover legal sanctions against state officials who violate health protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research method used is a normative legal research method where the reference is based on a conceptual approach to legislation. Sources of materials and laws used are primary and secondary. The data collection technique used is to collect references related to research. Furthermore, the data will be processed and analyzed using legal data processing methods systematically. The results of this study indicate that cases of spread and death rates caused by the corona virus are now increasing quite rapidly, a number of countries have even taken action by prohibiting every citizen from traveling abroad or receiving visits from foreign nationals (lockdown). In order to deal with the unrest experienced by the Indonesian people and efforts to prevent the transmission of the corona virus which is increasingly increasing the number of positive patients, the government issued several regulations or policies, namely Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2020, concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions. (PSBB) in the context of accelerating the handling of the 2019 coronavirus disease (covid-19).

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-58
Author(s):  
Anwar Hidayat ◽  
Budiman

Perkembangan pandemi Covid-19 saat ini sangat mengkhawatirkan dimana terjadinya suatupeningkatan kasus corona khusus di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahuidan menganalisis kebijakan yang diambil pemerintah dalam penanganan pandemi Covid-19serta langkah-langkah yang diambil pemerintah untuk menganggulangi dampak-dampak, terutama dampak dari segi ekonomi dan sosial akibat pandemi Covid-19. Metode penelitianhukum yang digunakan yakni metode penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun pendekatan yangdigunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatankonseptual. Penelitian ini berlandaskan pengaturan perundang-undangan yang mengaturmengenai penanganan dan penganggulangan pandemi Covid-19 serta analisis atas konseppenetapan peraturan perundang-undangan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dalamrangka penanganan Covid-19, berawal dari pemerintah tmengeluarkan kebijakan tentangPembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar yang merujuk pada Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan. Peraturan pelaksanaannya yaitu PeraturanPemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 tentang Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar, sertaKeputusan Presiden tentang Kedaruratan Kesehatan sampai dengan saat ini pemerintah telahmengeluarkan kebijakan PPKM yang dimana dilakukan secara berkala. Untukmenganggulangi dampak Covid-19 dari segi ekonomi dan sosial pemerintah mengambilbeberapa kebijakan-kebijakan, yang diantaranya adalah: Peraturan Menteri KeuanganRepublik Indonesia Nomor 23/Pmk.03/2020 tentang Insentif Pajak Untuk WajibPajakTerdampak Wabah Virus Corona; Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Kata Kunci : Kebijakan, Penanganan, Covid-19 The current development of the Covid-19 pandemic is very worrying where there is anincrease in special corona cases in Indonesia. This study aims to identify and analyze thepolicies taken by the government in handling the Covid-19 pandemic and the steps taken bythe government to mitigate the impacts, especially the economic and social impacts of theCovid-19 pandemic. The legal research method used is the normative legal research method. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Thisresearch is based on the legislation governing the handling and handling of the Covid-19pandemic as well as an analysis of the concept of establishing these laws and regulations. The results of this study are in the context of handling Covid-19, starting with thegovernment issuing a policy on Large-Scale Social Restrictions which refers to Law Number6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine. The implementing regulations are GovernmentRegulation Number 21 of 2020 concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions, as well as thePresidential Decree on Health Emergencies. Until now, the government has issued a PPKMpolicy which is carried out regularly. To address the economic and social impact of Covid- 19, the government has taken several policies, including: Regulation of the Minister ofFinance of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23/Pmk.03/2020 concerning Tax Incentives forTaxpayers Af ected by the Corona Virus Outbreak; Regulation of the Financial ServicesAuthority of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 /Pojk.03/2020 concerning NationalEconomic Stimulus as a Countercyclical Policy for the Impact of the Spread of Corona VirusDisease2019; and Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of2020 concerning Refocussing of Activities, Reallocation of Budgets, and Procurement ofGoods and Services in the Context of Accelerating Handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019(Covid-19). Keyword : Policy, Handling, Covid-19


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Inggit Akim

ABSTRACTSupervise the government as the provider of public services to carry out their duties and authorities under applicable regulations. Large-Scale Social Restrictions are restrictions on certain activities in an area suspected of being infected with Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which causes the quality of public services to be disrupted. The Ombudsman has the task of supervising the implementation of shared services organized by state or government officials and private or individual bodies assigned the task of providing services according to minimum service standards as a benchmark for service delivery and assessing the quality of services to the community. The research method used is normative juridical research with a conceptual approach (Statute Approach).The results of this study are large-scale social restriction policies through the Mayor of Tarakan Regulation Number 17 of 2020, restrictions on activities outside the house such as the implementation of learning at schools and/or other educational institutions, Work From Home (WFH), religious movements in houses of worship, activities in public places, social and cultural activities and Mandatory rapid tests for those using Sea and Air transportation modes, and providing social assistance to communities affected by COVID-19. Ombudsman's supervision of public services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Tarakan City, namely by conducting coordination and control and cooperation with state and private officials as well as community or individual organizations, opening an Online Complaint Post for COVID-19 Affected Persons. Also, conduct unannounced checks to improve public services in the City of Tarakan. Based on the supervision, the receipt of reports on suspicion of maladministration and the Ombudsman's investigation results are subject to examination. Suppose it is proven that it has committed maladministration in public services, the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia can take corrective action and provide recommendations/suggestions to state administrators to improve the quality of public services. Keywords: Surveillance; Ombudsman; Public Service; COVID-19 Pandemic


Author(s):  
Muhammad Yusrizal Adi Syaputra

The political party's position as a determinant of government head nomination in Indonesia made the political party a central and strong role in the determination of the Cabinet in the presidential government of Indonesia and allowed the political party to determine the Cabinet domination established by the President elected. This research aims to determine the model of the presidential institution strengthening in the multi-party era in Indonesia and to know the political and juridical construction of the presidential institution in determining the cabinet in Indonesia. The method used is a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. The results of this research are, firstly that the strengthening of the presidential institution in the multi-party era can occur when done with the restriction of political parties through the mechanism of the parliamentary threshold. Secondly, that the political construction of the cabinet determination by the President is based on the coalition of political party supporters of the government, and the juridical construction of the President may elect the Minister of the party proposal because it is based on article 6A paragraph (2) The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945. Kedudukan partai politik sebagai penentu pencalonan kepala pemerintahan di Indonesia menjadikan Partai Politik memiliki peran sentral dan kuat dalam penentuan kabinet di Pemerintahan Presidentiil Indonesia dan memungkinkan partai politik untuk menentukan dominasi kabinet yang dibentuk oleh Presiden terpilih. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui model penguatan lembaga kepresidenan pada era multi partai di Indonesia, dan untuk mengetahui konstruksi politis dan yuridis lembaga kepresidenan dalam menentukan kabinet di Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa pertama, penguatan lembaga kepresidenan di era multi partai dapat terjadi apabila dilakukan dengan pembatasan partai politik melalui mekanisme parlementary threshold. Kedua, bahwa konstruksi politis penentuan kabinet oleh presiden didasarkan atas koalisi partai politik pendukung pemerintahan, dan konstruksi yuridis presiden dapat memilih menteri dari usulan partai karena didasarkan pada Pasal 6A ayat (2) UUD 1945.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Retnowati WD Tuti ◽  
Ma'mun Murod ◽  
Tria Patrianti

Large-scale Social Limitation (hereinafter referred to as PSBB) is one form of concern. The government and local governments are Pendemic throughout Indonesia and the world, namely Pandemic Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19). Bogor Regency, which is one of the buffer cities of the Republic of Indonesia, is an area that is quite vulnerable in spreading the Corona virus. Why? because many DKI Jakarta employees / laborers live in Bogor Regency, whose mobility is very high. With the birth of Regent Regulation No. 16 of 2020 concerning Implementation of Large- Scale Social Restrictions in Handling COVID-19 in order to conserve the use of Covid 19. The purpose of this study is to analyze the Implementation of Large Scale Social Limitation Policies in the Government of Bogor Regency. This research method uses Qualitative Methods with Literature Study research methods. (Huberman, Miles, 1994). The technique of inviting data is by searching Scientific Journals, Online Mass Media, Legislation and Books. The technique to determine Online Media by Pusposive, while for data analysis using Nvivo 12 Plus. Test the validity of the data by testing the data source. The results of the study show that the implementation of the Large-Scale Social Limitation Policy in the Bogor District Government has not yet proceeded, starting from the clash of authority between the Central Government and the Regional Government so that it cannot make improvements, and many more are in accordance with the provisions of Covid-19 and its distribution. Social assistance to the community.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Beny Yunianto ◽  
Tomy Michael

AbstractThe aim of the research is to offer novelty regarding the constitualism of the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law regarding Covid-19 which has now become a Law. This study uses a normative research method, with a focus on solving issues (problems) based on legal principles, legal rules, as well as on recognized legal expert opinion or doctrine. Through this research, the researcher offers that the perppu which has now become a law must be declared invalid or revoked because it is unconstitutional. As is well known, the Government issued Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2020 concerning State Financial Policy and Financial System Stability for Handling Pandemic Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and / or in the Context of Facing Threats that Endanger the National Economy and / Or Financial System Stability, on March 31, 2020 (now Law Number 2 of 2020, on May 18, 2020). In Article 27 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (3) it is stated that there are parties who have "privileges", namely obtaining legal immunity from all actions they take on the basis of implementing the Covid Perppu. Of course this is a problem, because as a rule of law, Indonesia must provide justice in the form of equal treatment before the law or equality before the law to society without exception. This is stated in Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28D paragraph (1), and Article 28I paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Thus, the Perppu which has now become a law is contrary to the Constitution, so it must be canceled or declared invalid.Keywords: constitution; Covid-19; equality before the lawAbstrakTujuan penelitian, yaitu menawarkan kebaruan mengenai konstitualisme dari Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-undang mengenai Covid-19 yang sekarang telah menjadi Undang-Undang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif, dengan berfokus pada pemecahan isu (masalah) yang didasarkan pada asas hukum, aturan hukum, maupun pada doktrin atau pendapat ahli hukum yang diakui. Melalui penelitian ini, peneliti menawarkan bahwa, perppu yang sekarang telah menjadi undang-undang tersebut harus dinyatakan tidak berlaku atau dicabut karena inkonstitusional. Seperti diketahui, Pemerintah mengeluarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Kebijakan Keuangan Negara Dan Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Untuk Penanganan Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Dan/Atau Dalam Rangka Menghadapi Ancaman Yang Membahayakan Perekonomian Nasional Dan/Atau Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan, pada tanggal 31 Maret 2020 (sekarang menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2020, pada tanggal 18 Mei 2020). Dalam Pasal 27 ayat (1), ayat (2), dan ayat (3) disebutkan bahwa ada pihak-pihak yang mendapat “keistimewaan”, yaitu mendapat kekebalan hukum dari segala tindakan yang dilakukannya atas dasar pelaksanaan perppu covid tersebut. Tentu itu menjadi masalah, karena sebagai negara hukum, Indonesia harus memberikan keadilan berupa perlakuan yang sama didepan hukum atau equality before the law kepada masyarakat tanpa terkecuali. Hal tesebut tercantum dalam Pasal 27 ayat (1), Pasal 28D ayat (1), dan Pasal 28I ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sehingga, Perppu yang kini telah menjadi undang-undang tersebut bertentangan dengan Konstitusi, sehingga harus di batalkan atau dinyatakan tidak berlaku.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Ayu Paramitha

AbstractThe writing entitled Institutional Status of the Situbondo District Government Radio, Suara Rengganis will discuss and discuss the first is the institutional status and the Government Radio of the Situbondo Regency Suara Rengganis until now seen from the applicable laws and regulations and the second discussion discusses the provisions regarding the institutional status of Broadcasting Institutions. Local Public (LPPL) Region based on Government Regulation which talks about the Implementation of the Broadcasting of a Public Broadcasting Institution. So that in this paper the researcher will use the normative juridical research method with the Legislative, Case and Conceptual approach. The comparative approach. Considering that local public broadcasting institutions do not yet exist in Situbondo Regency, the local government urgently needs to establish a local public broadcasting institution station to accelerate and contribute information. This research is expected to be a comprehensive research related to the institutional status of Local Public Broadcasting Institutions The local government of Situbondo Regency and of course for researchers, this research can contribute ideas for academics and of course the administrative governance of LPPL better.Keywords: broadcasting; institutional status; regional autonomyAbstrakPenulisan yang berjudul Status Kelembagaan Radio Pemerintah Kabupaten Situbondo Suara Rengganis ini akan mengupas dan membahas tentang pertama adalah status kelembagaan dan Radio Pemerintah Kabupaten Situbondo Suara Rengganis hingga saat ini dilihat dari peraturan perundang undangan yang berlaku dan pembahsan yang kedua membahas mengenai ketentuan tentang status kelembagaan Lembaga Penyiaran Publik Lokal (LPPL) Daerah berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah yang berbicara mengenai Penyelenggaraan tentang  Penyiaran sebuah Lembaga Penyiaran Publik. Sehingga dalam penulisan ini peneliti akan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normative dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus dan konseptual. Mengingat lembaga penyiaran publik lokal belum ada di Kabupaten Situbondo, pemerintah daerah setempat sangat perlu untuk mendirikan satu stasiun lembaga penyiaran publik lokal guna mempercepat dan memberikan kontribusi informasi.Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi penelitian yang komprehensif terkait dengan status kelembagaa Lembaga Penyiaran Publik Lokal dan berguna bagi Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Situbondo dan tentunya bagi peneliti maka penelitian ini bisa memberikan sumbangsih pemikiran bagi akademik dan tentunya tata administratif tentang LPPL dengan lebih baik.


Author(s):  
Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba ◽  

Correctional Bureau (BAPAS) plays a very important and strategic role in child criminal case settlement. One form of the settlement is made through diversion, for child to avoid the bad impact of formal child criminal judicature. The research employed a juridical normative research method and statute approach and conceptual approach. The role of Bapas in child criminal case settlement through diversion is quite important and strategic as set forth in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning Child Criminal Judiciary System, Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015 concerning the Guidelines on the Implementation of Diversion and Dealing with Under 12 (Twelve) Years Old Child, Regulation of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2014 concerning the Guidelines on Diversion Implementation in Child Criminal Judiciary System. The constraints found in the diversion implementation are related to remedy for victim and non-optimal post-diversion supervision by the Correctional Advisor of Correctional Bureau (PK Bapas).


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-64
Author(s):  
Efrita Norman ◽  
Enah Pahlawati ◽  
Rio Kartika Supriyatna

In 2020, the world community was shocked by the spread of Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) in various countries, so far based on WHO data, 233 countries have cases of Covid-19, including Indonesia. As an anticipatory measure for the Indonesian government in cutting the chain of the spread of the corona virus, the Indonesian government issued government regulation Number 21 of 2020 concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB), the increasing number of the spread of the corona virus in Indonesia, the government issued a new policy on July 31, 2021 regarding PPKM where The movement of people is restricted to reduce the spread of the corona virus. This has an impact on people's economic conditions that are not easy, the unemployment rate is so complex. This research is a qualitative research using the literature study method where the author collects data, studies, and analyzes from the literature published by books, journals, and magazine articles so as to obtain accurate and in-depth data about family financial management. The results of this study are financial management. family is very important because we do not live alone but we are part of the family, society and the country as for the steps we take in managing family finances are as follows: (1) record expenses that must be spent monthly, (2) record all expenses that may or may not be monthly, (3) record all monthly passive income (4) record all monthly active income (5) add up monthly expenses plus expenses may or may not monthly (6) add up monthly passive income with active income per month.(7) calculate the difference in the sum n point 5 with point 6 (8) targeting our financial condition by multiplying monthly expenses by 12. one month. And the key to success in managing family finances is to increase self-capacity, want to learn more, and want to fight again and be able to refrain from being consumptive.In 2020, the world community was shocked by the spread of Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) in various countries, so far based on WHO data, 233 countries have cases of Covid-19, including Indonesia. As an anticipatory measure for the Indonesian government in cutting the chain of the spread of the corona virus, the Indonesian government issued government regulation Number 21 of 2020 concerning Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB), the increasing number of the spread of the corona virus in Indonesia, the government issued a new policy on July 31, 2021 regarding PPKM where The movement of people is restricted to reduce the spread of the corona virus. This has an impact on people's economic conditions that are not easy, the unemployment rate is so complex. This research is a qualitative research using the literature study method where the author collects data, studies, and analyzes from the literature published by books, journals, and magazine articles so as to obtain accurate and in-depth data about family financial management. The results of this study are financial management. family is very important because we do not live alone but we are part of the family, society and the country as for the steps we take in managing family finances are as follows: (1) record expenses that must be spent monthly, (2) record all expenses that may or may not be monthly, (3) record all monthly passive income (4) record all monthly active income (5) add up monthly expenses plus expenses may or may not monthly (6) add up monthly passive income with active income per month.(7) calculate the difference in the sum n point 5 with point 6 (8) targeting our financial condition by multiplying monthly expenses by 12. one month. And the key to success in managing family finances is to increase self-capacity, want to learn more, and want to fight again and be able to refrain from being consumptive.


Author(s):  
Ratnawati Ratnawati

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) is infectious disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndr ome Coronavirus2. Sars-Cov-2 is a new type of coronavirus that infects thousands of millions of people in the world in a short time. Anticipating the increase in the spread of infection due to COVID-19, the government urges all people to adopt a new lifestyle during the pandemic. Prevention efforts carried out by the government are the implementation of Health Protocols, Adaptation of New Habits, Large-Scale Social Restrictions, and Enforcement of Restrictions on Community Activities. This scientific work aims to determine the prevention efforts made by the government in reducing the spread of covid-19. This research method uses literature studies or studies of journals regarding the prevention of COVID-19. The results show that the efforts made by the DKI Jakarta Government in preventing the spread of covid-19 by implementing Health Protocols (washing hands with soap, wearing masks, social distancing, maintaining distance, self-isolation), New Adaptations/New Normal, Large-Scale Social Restrictions, and Enforcement Restrictions on Community Activities. The conclusion is the efforts to prevent the spread of covid-19 carried out by the DKI Jakarta Government as a change in the order of people's lives by applying various rules. This is done to reduce the spread of COVID-19 in the community. Then it is necessary to enforce strict and real punishments for violators in the form of fines large enough to create a deterrent effect for people who violate the policies and rules that have been applied.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fradhana Putra Disantara

This legal research uses a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. This research was carried out by inventorying primary and secondary materials, so as to obtain an appropriate analysis and critical review of published legal issues. The purpose of the study was to analyze the dynamics of Large Scale Social Restrictions Policies, especially regarding the Regulation of Minister of Health Number 9 of 2020and analyze various problematic PSBB policies during the pandemic. This study states that the PSBB is different from regional quarantine. On the other hand, the PSBB regulation in the Regulation of Minister of Health Number 9 of 2020  also raises doubts.Then,the Chief of Police's Declaration Mak/2/III/2020 provided strong legitimacy to strengthen the PSBB policy in terms of public compliance.The PSBB policy by the Central and Regional Governments has left various problems. Starting from material errors, contradiction of the article in the Governor's Regulation, and the Governor's Regulation which is not based on the Law above. The solution that can be done is to revise the Government Regulation No. 21 of 2020 and conduct executive review of the Governor's Regulation. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document