scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-192
Author(s):  
M. Yasin Al Arif
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Strong Influence ◽  
Social Analysis ◽  
Social Phenomenon ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Social Approach ◽  
The Law

This study aims to find the problem of law enforcement in Indonesia through social analysis and using the progressive legal as a new paradigm in law enforcement in Indonesia. So the assumption used is to make the law a social phenomenon. The formulation of the problem in this research are what the problem in law enforcement against respect for human dignity is, and how the progressive law provide a new paradigm in law enforcement so as not to deviate from the values ​​that live in society. This study uses the socio-legal research method using social approach methods and normative juridical approaches. This article concludes, first, the problem of law enforcement is caused by the strong influence of the positivistic legal paradigm to make values ​​in society hit and ignored; errors in interpreting the law which is interpreted in a letter from the written articles; and the lack of strictness of a provision contained in legislation that opens the gap for the possibility of deviation by the implementers. Second, progressive law can be an alternative as well as a solution in law enforcement that reflects the values ​​of justice in society. With progressive law, actors in law enforcement must have a progressive perspective so that they are not confined to legal formalism in order to uphold the values ​​of justice in society, including through “the law makes happiness”, “punishing it reconciles”, “seeing the context behind the text”; and “using conscience in law enforcement”. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan problematika penegakan hukum di Indonesia melalui analisa sosial dan menggunakan hukum progresif sebagai paradigma baru dalam penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Asumsi yang digunakan adalah menjadikan hukum sebagai gejala sosial. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah apa yang menjadi problem dalam penegakan hukum terhadap penghormatan martabat manusia, dan bagaimana hukum progresif memberikan paradigma baru dalam penegakan hukum agar tidak menyimpang dari nilai-nilai yang hidup dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode sosio-legal dengan pendekatan sosial dan yuridis normatif. Artikel ini menunjukkan, pertama, problematika penegakan hukum disebabkan kuatnya pengaruh paradigma legal positivistik sehingga nilai-nilai di masyarakat menjadi ditabrak dan diabaikan; kekeliruan dalam menafsirkan hukum yang dimaknai secara tekstual dari pasal-pasal yang tertulis; dan kurang tegasnya suatu ketentuan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga membuka celah kemungkinan penyimpangan oleh para pelaksananya. Kedua, hukum progresif bisa menjadi alternatif sekaligus solusi dalam penegakan hukum yang mencerminkan nilai-nilai keadilan dalam masyarakat. Dengan hukum progresif, penegak hukum harus mempunyai cara pandang progresif agar tidak terkungkung pada formalisme hukum demi menegakkan nilai-nilai keadilan dalam masyarakat, antara lain melalui “hukum membuat bahagia”, “menghukum itu mendamaikan”, “melihat konteks di balik teks”; dan “menggunakan hati nurani dalam penegakan hukum”.

The Law Enforcement Weakness of Songs and Musics Copyright Crimes

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-154
Author(s):  
Edi Tuahta Putra Saragih ◽  
Muhammad Citra Ramadhan ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Cultural Factor ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Law ◽  
Real Picture

This research aimed to: (a) obtain the forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); (b) understand the role of the police, in this case the Police Precinct, in the law enforcement; (c) identify the factors that influenced the law enforcement. The research method used the normative-empirical legal research, with the initial stages of specifying norms in order to get the proper picture, and then specifying empirical events in order to get the real picture. The research results showed several matters: 1) The forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics) found included: the distribution of the works or the copies, the performances of the works, and the announcements of the works; 2) Police Precinct did notultimately carry out their role as a law enforcer for the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); and 3) The factors that influenced the law enforcement on the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics), namely: legislation factor, in the matter of complaint offenses; law enforcement factor, in terms of the capacity of members; less supportive factor of facilities and infrastructure; legal awareness factor, in the problem of the lack of legal counseling; and cultural factor, related to the differences in norms in the copyright law between those in society and those in regulations. 

scholarly journals Implementasi Pemungutan Retribusi Daerah Bidang Persampahan Dan Kebersihan Berdasarkan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 15 Tahun 2011 Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-98
Author(s):  
Muhsin Muhsinhukum
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Research Method ◽  
User Fees ◽  
Clear Picture ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Sanitation Services ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
The Law

Efforts to implement the implementation of the Regional Regulation regarding the retribution for waste and sanitation services in Indragiri Hilir Regency certainly require support from many parties, both from the local government and the community who are classified as obligatory levies. The problems in this study are (1) How is the Implementation of Collection of Regional Retribution in the Sector of Waste and Cleanliness Based on Regional Regulation Number 15 of 2011 Indragiri Hilir Regency, (2) What are the Inhibiting Factors in the Implementation of Collecting Regional Levies in the Sector of Waste and Cleanliness Based on Regional Regulation Number 15 of 2011 Indragiri Hilir Regency. (3) What are the Efforts in Implementing Regional Retribution Collectors in the Sector of Waste and Cleanliness Based on Regional Regulation Number 15 of 2011 Indragiri Hilir Regency This research method uses empirical/sociological legal research, the nature of this research is descriptive, that is, it provides a clear picture. It can be concluded that (1) Implementation of Collection of Regional Levies in the Sector of Waste and Cleanliness Based on Regional Regulation No. 15 of 2011 Indragiri Hilir Regency begins with collecting data and mandatory registration of user fees clearly and correctly and collecting using SKRD which is carried out once a month turns into two times in one month. month. (2) Inhibiting factors in this implementation can be seen from the lack of supervision, factors from the law itself, law enforcement factors, facilities and facilities and community factors. (3) Efforts are made by increasing the supervision carried out by DLHK together with Bapenda, issuing regulations further implementing regulations as a basis for implementing additional regulations, involving Satpol PP who act as regional regulations enforcers and the formation of PPNS as part of investigators who are authorized to take action on cases of regional regulations violations committed by retribution obligations that do not implement regulations.      

scholarly journals Kewenangan Pemerintah Provinsi Bali dalam Pengawasan terhadap Pramuwisata yang Tidak Berlisensi

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-168
Author(s):  
Putu Ananda Sari ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
I Nyoman Sutama
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Control Function ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Provincial Government ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Tour Guides ◽  
The Law ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Government

Control of unlicensed tour guides is the authority of the Bali provincial government through Civil service police Unit (Satpol PP) as a form of oversight of all regional regulations, especially regional guide regulations. SatPol PP is granted the authority to supervise by the government and cooperate with court police and tourism institutions in the law enforcement system. This study discusses the authority of the Bali Provincial Government in supervising unlicensed tour guides and sanctions against unlicensed tour guides. The method used to achieve these goals is the empirical legal research method, which is to conduct field research through interviews and taking notice of the existing phenomena in society related to the problems being studied. The results of the data analysis show that the government is provided the authority by statutory regulations through Law Number 10 of 009 concerning Tourism and Regional Regulation of the Province of Bali Number 5 of 2016 concerning Tour Guides. Supervision is carried out through preventive and repressive measures and is in the law enforcement system. Sanctions are applied to tour guides who are not licensed by imposing sanctions in the form of fines through court proceedings and tour guides who commit violations will be subject to tourism violations in the form of fines. The implementation is carried out through the secrets of the tour guides when carrying out their duties in each tourism area in Bali. Guiding secrets are executed through the control function in each working area.

scholarly journals PERJANJIAN EKSTRADISI DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA

Yustitia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-200
Author(s):  
Nabella Rona Sahati ◽  
Kodrat Alam
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
International Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Diplomatic Relations ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The World ◽  
National Jurisdiction ◽  
Analytical Research ◽  
The Law

Extradition Agreeament (treaty) provides facilities for countries that have an agreement, where the agreement is to act against, arrest and prosecute criminals in a country who have fled to another country outside national jurisdiction. The presence of the perpetrator in another country is to avoid attempts to arrest him in connection with the crime he has committed in the country of origin. So by running out of the country, this means that there are other countries whose interests are harmed because they cannot arrest the perpetrator, in which the perpetrator has committed a violation of the law based on the location where the crime was committed (locus delicti). One of them is that the criminal case of corruption is considered a threat of extraordinary crime that harms all people in the world, in upholding the law of corruption in which the perpetrator has fled abroad so that he feels safe and free from a crime he has committed. So extradition is very necessary for the perpetrators of corruption who have fled to other countries. From the background that has been explained, the following problems can be made inventory, namely 1) what is the position of the extradition agreement in international law related to criminal acts of corruption and 2) how is the implementation of extradition agreements against perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical research method, namely legal research that refers to legal norms contained in statutory regulations with descriptive analytical research specifications with the aim of obtaining an overview of the application of extradition agreements to perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia based on Law Number 1 of 1979 of Extradition. The results in this research have shown that indeed there have been regulations regarding extradition treaties but it has been long enough and it is necessary to have regulatory reforms according to existing needs, furthermore it is necessary to improve diplomatic relations because law enforcement of criminal acts of corruption which involves cooperation between two countries is not only achieved through extradition treaties, but also good diplomatic relations.

scholarly journals Penegakan Hukum Larangan Berburu Satuan Liar di Wilayah TNK Labuan BAJO Manggarai Barat

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-232
Author(s):  
Fransiskus Leric Kleden ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
National Park ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Local Extinction ◽  
Wild Animals ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Illegal Hunting ◽  
Deer Population ◽  
The Law

The diversity of fauna in Indonesia is Yaranus komodoensis in the Komodo National Park (TNK) Labuan Bajo, East Nusa Tenggara. Currently, Kornodo is suspected of experiencing local extinction, thought to be caused by a reduced deer population due to illegal hunting, law enforcement on the prohibition of hunting wildlife in the area is still ineffective considering that hunting of wild animals is still happening. Efforts are made to increase the effectiveness of law enforcement on wildlife hunting by socializing the community and increasing the number of forest police officers in each region. . The research method used is empirical legal research, meaning that a study examines the problem based on the facts that occur in the field. From the research, there was hunting of deer wildlife in Komodo National Park. The purpose of this research is to determine the enforcement of the law on the prohibition of hunting wildlife in the Kornodo National Park and to find out the effectiveness of enforcing the law on the prohibition of hunting wildlife in the Komodo National Park.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pekerja Penyandang Disabilitas pada PT. Sumber Alfaria Trijaya

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-121
Author(s):  
I Wayan Tika Tambunan ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Retail Company

At present, there are cases of persons with disabilities being employed in a retail company in the Bali area. The Manpower Act provides provisions for companies to employ people with disabilities. Therefore, companies are required to provide accessibility. This research was conducted with the aim of describing the implementation of legal protection for workers with disabilities at PT. Sumber Alfaria Trijaya based on Law Number 13 2003 and the factors that become obstacles in the application of legal protection for workers with disabilities at PT. Source Alfaria Trijaya. The research method used is an empirical legal research method with a factual approach and a statutory approach. Based on the results of data analysis, the implementation of legal protection provided by PT. Sumber Alfaria Trijaya towards workers with disabilities has not been fulfilled, namely in terms of providing qualified accessibility. Several factors inhibiting the implementation of legal protection efforts for workers with disabilities, namely the law enforcement factor itself and the community factor. So the government is expected to further optimize the supervision of companies that have not implemented the mandate of the law and provide socialization and guidance to companies and workers on the importance of rights and obligations.

scholarly journals Konsepsi Hukum Progresif dalam Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Efraim Mbomba Reda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Role Models ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Positivism ◽  
Sociology Of Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Method

Progressive law puts forward the sociology of law rather than legal certainty which is the focus of legal positivism. In Indonesia, this law was coined by Satjipto Rahardjo. This study aims to determine the formulation of progressive law in future criminal law, and to determine the actualization of the concept of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative legal research method with statute and conceptual approaches. The technique of collecting legal materials in this study is a descriptive method that aims to obtain the meaning of reality related to the problems to be discussed and solved in this study. The results show that in the current Criminal Code Bill, progressive law has been regulated, to be precise in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2). Progressive law is also regulated in Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Then, the actualization of progressive law in regulating corruption in Indonesia is a judge with the powers that take into account the sociological context of society in making decisions. Judges, prosecutors and lawyers can certainly discuss together in eradicating corruption. Efforts are also being made to reconstruct and redefine the power of law enforcement. This arrangement can also encourage the KPK to be more progressive in eradicating corruption, as well as building law enforcers who have morality so that they can become role models and increase public participation, for example by forming NGOs in preventing or fighting corruption in various agencies.

scholarly journals Mekanisme Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Proses Penyadapan dilihat dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM)

JURNAL BELO ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-85
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ingelyne Nussy
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Privacy Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Investigation Process ◽  
Do So

ABSTRACT Recognition and protection of a guarantee of human dignity to earn a respectable place in the eyes of the law and government. Related to the interests of law enforcement, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) for the purpose of wiretapping evidence in court, while will protecting the privacyrights of suspects. Legal protections for the accused to be seen as matter of law adopted. Therefore, the protection of the privacy rights of a person to be seen in the investigation process. For the Commission to conduct wiretaps should see privacy rights as stipulated in the law and the government should establish a special set of rules that intercepts, thus providing the possibility for law enforcement has the authority to do so does not conflict with human rights.

scholarly journals Law Enforcement of Criminal Forests and Land Fire in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, Province of Riau

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Rizana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Rare Phenomenon ◽  
The Law ◽  
Article 50

Law Enforcement of Criminal Forests and Land Fire in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, Province of Riau Forest and land fires are not a rare phenomenon in Indonesia, especially in Riau Province. This study aims to explain the law enforcement of forest and land fire crimes in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, Province of Riau. The method used in this research is sociological legal research. Based on Article 50 Paragraph (3) Letter d of Law Number 41 of 1999 it is stated that everyone is prohibited from burning forests. In line with that, based on Article 69 Paragraph (1) Letter h of Law Number 32 Year 2009 it is stated that everyone is prohibited from clearing land by burning. However, in 2019 there will still be forest and land fires in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, Province of Riau covering an area of approximately 827 Ha. The implementation of Law No. 41/1999 and Law No. 32/2009 concerning forest and land fires in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir has not run as expected. Burning forests and land is a crime. Law enforcement against forest and land fires in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir based on Article 78 Paragraph (3) of Law Number 41 Year 1999 states that anyone who intentionally burns a forest can be threatened with a maximum of 15 years imprisonment and a maximum fine IDR 5,000,000,000. Pursuant to Article 108 of Law Number 32 Year 2009 it is also emphasized that everyone who burns a land shall be sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of 3 (three) years and a maximum of 10 (ten) years, and a fine of at least Rp. 3,000,000,000.- (three billion rupiah) and a maximum of Rp 10,000,000,000 (ten billion rupiah).

scholarly journals Kedudukan Sita Umum Terhadap Sita Lainnya Dalam Proses Kepailitan (The Position Of General Seizure Towards Others In The Process Of Bankrupcy)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-234
Author(s):  
Luthvi Febryka Nola
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Bankruptcy Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
The Impact

Article 31 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law stipulate that all seizures that have been determined on the debtor's assets are null and void since the bankruptcy verdict is pronounced and since then the only validity is general seizure. However, in its practice various seizures are still stipulated on bankrupt assets ranging from civil, criminal and tax seizures. This paper discusses the forms of seizure in the bankruptcy process, the position of general seizure of other seizures in bankruptcy and the impact of the position of general seizure on debt payments to creditors. The research method used is normative legal research using secondary data collected through library studies and document studies. The various data were then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. This writing found that there are rules in other laws such as Article 39 paragraph (2) KUHAP and Article 6 paragraph (1) Law No. 19 of 2000 that have ruled out the position of general seizure. The experts in each field of science also have different views regarding the position of general seizure. This condition has resulted in the emergence of friction between law enforcement, inconsistency of judges’ decisions, length of bankruptcy proceedings, injustice, unclear data on bankruptcy assets and reduced bankruptcy assets. Therefore, the understanding of law enforcement regarding legal principles, especially the principle of lex specialis derogate legi generalis, needs to be improved. The use of prejudgment seizure in the bankruptcy process must be socialized to maximize control over bankrupt assets. To avoid prolonged process of bankruptcy, the bankruptcy law should limit the time period for the settlement of assets to the curator.AbstrakPasal 31 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU Kepailitan mengatur bahwa segala sita yang telah ditetapkan atas harta kekayaan debitor menjadi hapus semenjak putusan pailit diucapkan dan semenjak itu satu-satunya yang berlaku adalah sita umum. Akan tetapi pada praktiknya berbagai sita tetap ditetapkan atas harta pailit mulai dari sita perdata, pidana dan pajak.  Tulisan ini membahas tentang bentuk-bentuk sita dalam proses kepailitan, kedudukan sita umum terhadap sita lainnya dalam kepailitan dan dampak dari kedudukan sita umum terhadap pembayaran utang kepada para kreditor. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui kegiatan studi perpustakaan maupun studi dokumen. Berbagai data tersebut kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Penulisan ini menemukan bahwa adanya aturan dalam UU lain seperti Pasal 39 ayat (2) KUHAP dan Pasal 6 ayat (1) UU No. 19 Tahun 2000 telah mengesampingkan kedudukan sita umum. Ahli masing-masing bidang ilmu juga memiliki pandangan yang berbeda terkait kedudukan sita umum.  Kondisi ini berdampak pada munculnya pergesekan antara penegak hukum, inkonsistensi putusan hakim, lamanya proses kepailitan, terjadi ketidakadilan, ketidakjelasan data harta pailit, berkurang bahkan hilangnya harta pailit. Oleh sebab itu, pemahaman penegak hukum tentang asas hukum terutama asas lex specialis derogate legi generalis perlu ditingkatkan. Penggunaan lembaga sita jaminan dalam proses kepailitan harus disosialisasikan untuk memaksimalkan penguasaan terhadap harta pailit. Supaya proses kepailitan tidak berlarut-larut, UU kepailitan harusnya membatasi jangka waktu penyelesaian aset kepada kurator.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document